|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Thursday, September 11, 2008
10 Years in Publishing: What I've Learned (#4)
Posted by Jane
 Today's photo is from the 2003 Midwest Writers Workshop in Muncie, Ind.
There I met George Plimpton (pictured), who was the keynote speaker, and I wrote a
personal essay about the experience that was published here. What I've learned #4: It's all about target audience.
Lots
of writers/authors say their audience is everyone—and life forms yet
to be discovered. But you can succeed far more effectively and
quickly, at least in the beginning of your career, by identifying and marketing to a
target audience. Plus, if you have any knowledge of the Long Tail
phenomenon, then you know that the media world is becoming more
vertical (specialized information, niche audience) and less horizontal
(general information, broad audience). Bo Sacks frames it perfectly in his piece for Publishing Executive magazine, "5 Easy Steps to Publishing Nirvana."- Who is my target audience?
- Where is my targeted audience?
- What is the real value of my edit (information) to that audience?
- What is the most efficient method to reach the maximum targeted audience?
- How do I keep my information valuable and fresh for my targeted audience?
He
says, "These may seem like simple concepts on the surface, but they are
not. They constitute a complex, Zen-like formula. Success is measured
by the antique term called profit. And to achieve the Zen-like state of
profit, you must follow the Bo-formula to publishing nirvana (in the
box above). On the atomic level, it can all be distilled down to the
simple equation of RV = RP or, for the laymen, real value equals real
profit." One of the biggest problems I encounter—both
internally at F+W, as well as externally with authors—is a lack of
research into the audience or market for a book or product. The focus
is all too often on what the author wants to achieve or express—rather
than focusing on what benefit they bring to a readership. If an author can make
this fundamental paradigm shift in his/her approach, that author becomes instantly more attractive to
editors and agents. Building Readership | F+W Life | Getting Published
9/11/2008 2:45:49 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
A Book Proposal Is Like a Business Plan
Posted by Jane
One of my posts earlier this week (that argued most prescriptive nonfiction books have great info, not great writing) sparked a wonderful comment from Deborah that I wanted to bring to everyone's attention—because, as she says, this might be the most important point of all: This explains why I have so many personal rejection letters that
compliment my writing and my organization -- and some even end with, "I
hope to work with you in the future," but I still don't have a book
credit.
The real gem of this post is within the parentheses of the last
sentence -- a book proposal is like a business plan for a book idea.
I've recently asked a couple of published friends if I could see their
proposals, and I was left with my chin on my chest in awe over their
marketing plans. After reading them, I realized that my little
page-long marketing plans seemed really vague and incomplete compared
to their plans, which were three for four pages long and filled with
VERY detailed information (names of contact people, venues for
speaking, etc). When I read this post, it clicked that they had written
a business plan for their books.
Put another way: The No. 1 thing an agent or editor looks for in your book proposal: why your book will sell (turn a profit) and why you're the perfect person to market (sell) it. Many thanks to Deborah for her insight!
Getting Published | Industry News & Trends
9/11/2008 9:17:59 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, September 10, 2008
10 Years in Publishing: What I've Learned (#3)
Posted by Jane
 Today's photo was taken at EPICon 2003, where I participated on a publishing industry panel with author Piers Anthony. The three-member panel was titled "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Pros and Cons of E-Publishing." We noticed that Piers seemed to be the "good," I seemed to be the "bad," and the poor third panelist seemed to be the … ugly. What I've learned #3: I used to think (and the general public thinks) that editors read (or edit). People who meet me for the first time, upon learning I work as an editor say, "Wow, it must be great to read all day."
Instead of thinking of editors as people who read your work (and insert commas), think of them as the people who champion an author's work throughout the weeks and months leading to publication, throughout countless meetings and interactions with internal staff, and continue to champion that author when sales have flagged or the book has become a backlist title.
It falls on your editor to create and maintain in-house interest in a project. She’s the one responsible for ensuring a book doesn’t get overlooked by sales and marketing. This includes things like catalog copy and placement, publicity, and book packaging/treatment. Bottom line, your editor is the one who will push to make sure your book is just right, before-during-after publication. So, for fun, here's a snapshot of my week thus far. This is a typical week. A lot of these tasks are interspersed with one another (especially when it comes to e-mail), but for clarity, I'm not showing the multi-tasking. Also keep in mind that answering e-mail also involves manipulating various files in
some way to deliver information between departments. Monday9-10. Answer e-mails/questions from internal staff, authors, agents. 10-12. Send out contract addendums to cover e-book rights. Lunch. Discuss digital product plans with a colleague. 1-2. Meeting to discuss process for getting books on the Kindle. 2-3. Catch up on e-mail. 3-4. Maintain WritersDigest.com site (books homepage), as well as blog. 4-5. Start analyzing Fall 2008 Forecast for finance. 5-6. Finish responding to outstanding e-mails, read industry news. Tuesday9-10. Answer e-mails/questions from internal staff, authors, agents. 10-11. Editorial and design weekly team meeting. 11-12. Collect and funnel files for WRITING LIFE POETIC to Melissa (our dear assistant editor) for page make-up. Take care of queries, details associated with it. Lunch. Catch up on industry reading. 1-3. Send out contract addendums to cover e-book rights. Blog. 3-4. Cover meeting (to discuss design of book covers). 4-6. Catch up on e-mail. Wednesday9-10. Prepare for and have an impromptu meeting with my boss. 10-12. F+W Town Hall Meeting with the CEO. Lunch. Meet with a colleague over lunch. 1-2. Answer e-mails/questions from internal staff, authors, agents. 2-3. Discuss digital product plans and marketing with a colleague. 3-4. Title/design meeting (where we finalize the titles of upcoming books). 4-5. Catch up on industry reading, blog. 5-6. Continue Fall 2008 Forecast analysis. While I'm in a position (editorial director) that doesn't involve much personal editing responsibility, the editors on my team have similar schedules that allow limited time for manuscript review. Their time is occupied by digital product efforts, online community efforts, responding and communicating with our business partners (and keeping internal staff informed about authors/books), putting the books together in InDesign, and keeping the wheels in motion. F+W Life | Getting Published
9/10/2008 4:49:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, September 09, 2008
10 Years in Publishing: What I've Learned (#2)
Posted by Jane
 Today's photo features me as a F+W intern (summer 1997) at a photoshoot
for North Light's first decorative painting book by Donna Dewberry.
Editor Kathy Kipp acted as photographer, and there I am in the background—acting as the
light-switcher-on-and-offer (and shot list keeper). And now for the second installment of what I've learned: Crappy writing is the norm in prescriptive (or informative) nonfiction.
Put another way—a nicer way: great ideas rule. Whether you're looking to: - lose weight
- make money
- find love
- (or … even write better!)
You're
probably not seeking great literature. Rather, you're looking for
clear, authoritative, and compelling information that improves your
life, enriches your life, or makes life easier. You want a solid benefit, so the
book succeeds if it delivers on its promise, not if it is beautifully
written. People inside the industry—editors, salespeople,
marketing managers—all of them are looking for a great selling handle
backed up by great content. Why? The great selling handle gets the book sold into stores, in large quantities. Great content makes sure the book sells through the register, into readers' hands.
A
successful book needs both of these things, at minimum. But it does NOT need great
writing. Most people who specialize in great information or
helpful advice, and have the authority to dispense it (whether we're
talking about parenting, money, sex, etc)—these people do not typically have any writing skill (or even the desire to write). But most readers will not notice, or care. That's
why most nonfiction books are sold on the basis of a proposal (which is
like a business plan for a book idea), not on an actual manuscript. F+W Life | Getting Published
9/9/2008 2:50:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
How to Fail at Publishing in a Whole New Way
Posted by Jane
 Today at Maud Newton, John Warner (creative director of TOW Books), summarizes the new strategy of the TOW Books line: Now, after two years of, let’s call it, non-success, I understand that
the problem is at least as much about publicity and distribution as it
is about quality. (At least I hope that’s the problem.) So I’m here to
announce that if TOW Books is going to fail at publishing, we are going
to fail in our own spectacularly new way.
How badly are we struggling? Well, we’ve released four books. Their Amazon rankings at the time of this typing are:
170,374
388,165
706,198
1,033,377
The most distressing part is that last number belongs to a book I wrote, So You Want to Be President?
— a book that should have been especially relevant and timely given
that it’s a guide to running for office when totally unqualified. I
hope it’s in Governor Palin’s briefing materials.
Read the full post here. Building Readership | General | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Marketing & Self-Promotion
9/9/2008 2:31:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, September 08, 2008
10 Years in Publishing: What I've Learned (#1)
Posted by Jane
 To celebrate my 10 years with F+W Media, this week I'm blogging on five things I've learned after ten years in the business. Above I've posted a lovely photo of moi (taken by HR) on my first day of trade publishing life: August 3, 1998. If you like that photo, just wait. I'll post some more treasures from those glory years. What I've learned #1: Many authors claim they want good editors—and bemoan the fact that editors don't edit any more—but few authors graciously accept thorough editing and attention from their editors (when it does occur).
You often hear these days that editors no longer edit—that they're too busy doing other things, like meeting with sales and marketing, creating innovative products to compete with digital media, or simply managing the day-to-day tasks of producing dozens of titles per year. What I've found, though, is that an editor's life can be made miserable if she offers up a thorough development or content edit, because the author's ego (or attitude) gets in the way. This already sounds like terrible, horrible cliche—the writer vs. editor, us vs. them mentality that, frankly, is quite tired and tiresome for me. Let's try to take this a step further then, shall we? Perhaps even into positive territory! 1. First, remind yourself that the editor is trying to make the best book possible, and the suggestions/edits are meant to improve the book and help it succeed. Now, some editors have poor bedside manner (they only make negative comments; they never sprinkle in positive comments or helpful encouragement). I myself am guilty of this. But you must look past it. This editor wouldn't have agreed to work with you if she didn't believe in your idea, in your work, or in you. The admiration is there—the editing process is getting down to brass tacks, it is a laser-like focus on How can we take this to the next level? The edits aren't there to tell you what you did wrong. The edits are there to provide an outsider's perspective as well as an expert's perspective on your work. This should be invaluable feedback for improving your work and your own skills. If you're scanning the editor's comments looking only for variations of "What a genius you are!" you've completely misunderstood the editor's role. She's not there to bolster your self-worth. She's there to push you and challenge you. 2. You will inevitably disagree with some of the editor's suggestions. This is natural, this is expected, and this is nothing to get upset about.The editor is not always right, of course. But there's no reason to get angry if you disagree with her suggestions; anger or frustration over edits is wasted energy. Why? See Point 3 below. Also: Occasionally I work as a freelance copyeditor, and I'm always befuddled when I'm (frequently) told by the assigning editor, "Don't go too heavy or the author will freak out." Why do authors consider it a bad thing when their work is tightened, clarified, or otherwise improved? As a writer myself, I actually do know why. Because we become far too attached to our own words; we see them as extensions of our mind, heart, or soul. To see any of it cut—it's like having an internal organ dug out with a spoon. Guess what? It's time to stop treating our words as hallowed ground. If you find yourself disagreeing with everything the editor says, then evaluate whether you both have the same vision for the work. Has there been a critical misunderstanding as far as what the work is supposed to achieve? Obviously there can be different perspectives even when you're both headed for the same goal, but everyone's in trouble if you can't find common ground on the fundamental issues of unique selling point (of the book), target audience, and how to approach that audience. 3. Have a conversation with the editor (via phone or e-mail) in instances where you have a differing viewpoint.Again, the key is to have a productive conversation—and not flare up or lash out when your work is being revised, questioned, or cut apart. The editor will greatly respect you if you take the following approach in each conversation: a) Clearly identify the edit/suggestion that you have differing opinions on. b) Summarize why you think the editor wants you to make the change. If a reason was not given by the editor, ask why the change or revision was suggested. c) Once you fully understand why the change was suggested, explain either why you think the original version should remain, or suggest an alternative solution.
The key here is that when you explain (c), it should tie into what's best for the reader, the market, or the book. Any editor worth her salt will hear you out, and she'll be persuaded to your way of thinking if your argument is sound. Most writers are not very good at self-editing—it is an incredibly rare skill. It's why most writers belong to critique groups, so they can get hopefully impartial feedback that will help them improve their work. It's also part of your skill set to learn how to work effectively with editors. It may not come naturally at first, but if you're lucky enough to have a dedicated editor—an editor who edits—it's a gift. Learn how to take advantage of it, not get upset over it. Craft & Technique | F+W Life | General | Getting Published
9/8/2008 3:07:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, September 03, 2008
The Differences Between Imprints at Book Publishers
Posted by Jane
There's a great post (that will become a series) at Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind that explains the differences between imprints at book publishers. Must-read material for aspiring book authors (and hey, for agents and people inside the industry too!). A snippet: Something else that might help would be to take Thomas Dunne's name
off of any minotaur titles they acquire, because I'm sorry, which
imprint is it? Or is it St. Martin's? Way too much confusion, please
pick one (which would be Minotaur, of course.) As for Thomas Dunne Books,
um, well....I think of small titles that make money on the library
market? To be fair, Dunne's been around publishing for something like
40 years and the "something for everybody" attitude worked in a world
of single-digit television channels. Now, not so much. Will the name
survive when Dunne retires? Somehow I doubt it.
Click here to visit the full post. Getting Published | Industry News & Trends
9/3/2008 2:23:08 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Some Things About Writing Never Change (e.g, Huge Army of Disappointed Scribblers)
Posted by Jane
This week I received a great message from an attendee of the Sacramento State Workshop, where I was a workshop presenter a few weeks ago. ( You can find my recap of the workshop here.) Teresa Fleming says: … please don't apologize for the times you have to be discouraging. It's for the best, you know. Of course, you should also know this is coming from someone who: (1) has no memoir plans, and (2) spent a couple of decades in the banking business. (Really, Ms. Smith, I am doing you a favor declining your million-dollar request for a loan to open a fuzzy-cheese-head-car-airfreshener-thingy business.) To close, here are a few quotes for fun. I do a bit of volunteer smoothreading (sort of like proofreading but more relaxed) for Distributed Proofreaders / Project Gutenberg. The day before your presentation, I finished a smoothy on a short book titled If You Don't Write Fiction by Charles Phelps Cushing (1920). Here are a couple of my favorites—some things don't change much, huh?
A huge army of disappointed scribblers have followed that haphazard plan of battle. They would know better than to try to market crates of eggs to a shoe store, but they see nothing equally absurd in shipping a popular science article to the Atlantic Monthly or an "uplift" essay to the Smart Set. They paper their walls with rejection slips, fill up a trunk with returned manuscripts and pose before their sympathetic friends as martyrs. … Which is to say that novelists and magazine fiction writers are accused of becoming more concerned about how their stories will film than about how the manuscripts will grade as pieces of literature. To get a yarn into print is still worth while because this enhances its value in the eyes of the producers of motion pictures. But the author's real goal is "no longer good writing, so much as remunerative picture possibilities."
Many thanks to Teresa for sharing a little bit of the 1920's writing advice! ( You can download the entire text from Google.) Stay tuned for a few excerpts from Writer's Digest titles from that era. (Yes, Writer's Digest did exist in the Roaring Twenties, and much of the advice we give has remained the same!) Fun | General | Getting Published
9/3/2008 1:38:37 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, August 27, 2008
News From Glimmer Train
Posted by Jane
Glimmer Train just announced the winners of their June Fiction Open competition. All winners will be published in an upcoming issue of Glimmer Train Stories. First place ($2,000)Shimon Tanaka (San Francisco, CA) “The Suit” Second place ($1,000)Christine Sneed (Evanston, IL) "Twelve + Twelve" Third place ($600)Horatio Potter (Wilsall, MT) “Summer Help” A PDF of the top 25 winners can be found here. This quarterly competition is open to all writers and all themes (word count range is 2,000–20,000). Submissions may be sent for the September Fiction Open using the Glimmer Train online submissions system at www.glimmertrain.org. Also: Very Short Fiction contest (deadline soon approaching! August 31)Glimmer Train hosts this contest twice a year, and first place is a very generous $1,200 plus publication in the journal. It's open to all writers, but stories cannot exceed 3,000 words. According to the site, it is rare for a piece of 500 words or less to be selected. Click here for complete guidelines.If you didn't know, Writer's Digest partnered with Glimmer Train to publish two compilation volumes of the best stuff from their Writers Ask newsletter. Be sure to check them out.  General | Getting Published
8/27/2008 3:16:44 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, August 19, 2008
BEA Pitch Slam Success Story
Posted by Jane
 Just received this news from agent Janet Reid (thanks for pointing out, Chuck!) Then there was that BEA Writers Digest Pitch Slam conference. I bitched and moaned and whined so much about going that Chuck forced me, yes FORCED me, to find a great writer, sign her, and sell her book for six figures. I blame Chuck entirely for that failure of expectations.
Chuck comments, "She's being sarcastic, of course, but she DID sign a client there and sell her book for six figures." Conferences/Events | Getting Published
8/19/2008 5:37:35 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, August 18, 2008
Is Your Memoir Kind of Like Those Horrible Singers on American Idol?
Posted by Jane
A freelancer and colleague, Jana Reiss, e-mailed me a few comments about my last blog post that I wanted to share. (Jana is a former reviewer at Publishers Weekly.) At PW I would get a lot of self-published memoirs for review, and authors never quite understood why I wasn't assigning their work. I couldn't exactly say, "Your writing sucks," even if that happened to be true, but I would tell them the same kinds of things you are saying here -- that unless you already have a celebrity platform or some kind of wonderful eat-pray-love kind of experience, no one outside your immediate circle is usually going to care what you have to say.
I laughed when I saw your description of writers who rely on their friends and family to tell them that their writing is terrific and sure to be featured on Oprah. I was on a panel once with an editor who asked all the first-time writers in the audience if they had ever seen the early episodes of American Idol. Most had. He said something like, "Those people who can't sing are always telling Simon Cowell, 'But my friends and my parents say I'm a really great singer!' And those people are horrible singers. You need a professional opinion." It was a great analogy and, judging from the uncomfortable looks of many people in the audience, he got his point across.
Another technique I have tried when speaking to writers is to ask them about the memoirs they have read recently. What did they like about them? Then I point out that the memoirs they have mentioned are without exception either a) written by celebrities or b) already bestsellers. It's a sobering thing when they realize that if THEY don't read memoir when it's not already water-cooler talk, why should anyone plunk down $24.95 for their story?
Many thanks to Jana for sharing her advice! More people need to hear it. Craft & Technique | Getting Published
8/18/2008 12:15:37 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Sunday, August 17, 2008
On the Road: SSU Writers' Workshop (And: Memoir/Storytelling Tips)
Posted by Jane
 Today was the final day of the Sacramento State University Writers' Conference; I arrived on Friday and have been meeting with writers and speaking since early on Saturday morning. This afternoon I was off-duty and walked to a nearby Borders (pictured above)—the first time I've walked into a bookstore flanked with palm trees. But down to business. Saturday (early morning): Manuscript CritiquesBefore the conference, I was sent 20-page manuscript samples from five writers. Four of the five were memoir or life story manuscripts. Let me state right out that memoir is difficult to do well, yet lots of people are attempting it. If you're not a celebrity, then your story has to survive on the art and craft of the writing, or your sharp and unique perspective—no easy feat for a new or inexperienced writer. Of the manuscripts I read, they tended to be: - Very raw and personal. This makes it difficult to revise with the requisite distance. Some of the manuscripts I read used excerpts from journals/diaries, which is usually not a good idea if we're talking about producing publishable work.
- Lacking a story arc. The reader needs to have a reason to keep reading, to feel like they are in the hands of an experienced storyteller. Even the life or the experience seems chaotic and without shape, there needs to be a shape and order on the page.
- Cathartic. Writing is an excellent way to find or make meaning out of painful and confusing experiences. But such writing isn't necessarily publishable. Personal essay and memoir has to go beyond a cathartic experience (that benefits the writer alone) and give the reader a compelling reason to keep reading.
Saturday (mid-morning): Speed PitchingI participated in a two-hour pitch session, where writers had three minutes to pitch their projects to editors/agents, one-on-one. Again, I encountered many writers trying to tell their life stories or family stories. RED FLAG: Memoir & Life StoryI can't begin to tell you how often I hear the following at writer's conferences (and from writers all over the map): - "My friends and family love my stories. They said I should write them down."
- "I wrote this just for my family, but they said it should be a published book."
- "My [family member] had an amazing life. Her stories deserve to be written and published so they're not lost forever."
What I'm about to say may appear cold, unfeeling, or downright mean, but: OK: Your life stories or family stories are unique and deserve to be shared. But do they deserve book publication? Or, more importantly, do you have the talent to tell these stories through the written word so that they do deserve book publication?
Everyone forgets that writing is a craft that takes years of dedication and practice to become skilled at. If you haven't been practicing the craft for years, there is little chance that your initial efforts to write your life story or memoir will be publishable, and even then, only with an incredible amount of hard work and revision. The same is true for fiction writers, of course. Very few novelists ever publish their first manuscript. Or second. Or third. Or fourth. It takes time before you get good—in any genre. The truth is: You could have the most sensational, unusual story ever, or the most boring story ever, but whether it's successful on the page all depends on your skill as a storyteller and as a writer—and not everyone has this skill. Period. Friends and family give bad advice. Don't forget that. They may love your stories, but they also love you (presumably!). That's why they're telling you to write and publish. When I meet discouraged memoirists and personal essayists, I think (unashamedly): Good! It's good that you're getting tired of it, that you're getting frustrated. It means you don't have what it takes, and you need to move onto something else. Book writing and publishing is not a money maker, it is not going to bring you fame and celebrity, and it will not bring in a flood of readers. It will likely disappoint. If you must have something for posterity, self-publish. Or save your money and save your stories in a Word document that you back up on multiple hard drives. OK. Off soapbox. Keynote: Dinah Lenney
Now that I've said my piece about aspiring memoirists (apologies to all memoirists!), let me talk about Dinah, who gave the keynote and has a published memoir. Her talk focused primarily on memoir, and it was the best talk I've ever heard on the genre. Generous, honest, funny. Her main point was that memoir is a performance that's driven by your voice or your presence. It's not necessarily the content, but your "cover" of the content. That is: Memoirists "cover" the past, take on the past, riff on the past, filter it and interpret it for an audience. She also had a great quote from Stendhal, "The heart can make anything seem important." It reminded me of a series on storytelling by Ira Glass. Here's the first in the series. (I may have already referenced this before, but it's worth referencing again.)
My Sessions For those who would like the PowerPoint presentations from my sessions (as PDFs), here they are!
Many thanks to the board members of the Sac State workshop, particularly Amy Ruddell, Verna Dreisbach, and Bill Pieper.
If you'd like to read some blog posts about the conference, visit this site. Conferences/Events | Craft & Technique | Getting Published
8/17/2008 6:12:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, August 12, 2008
How to Determine If You're High-Maintenance
Posted by Jane
For a couple months, I've been pondering an article posted on WritersDigest.com, "Don't Be a Writing Diva" by Mary Demuth. It offers solid, time-tested advice (meet deadlines early, do your homework, heed your editors, etc). But let's be honest for a moment here. This article describes The Perfect Author, who does not actually exist—just as the Perfect Best Friend, Perfect Lover, or Perfect Employee do not exist. I'm not saying we shouldn't have high standards for ourselves or for others. But we're only human, and anyone in the business knows that you have good times (when it's easy to be perfect), and then you have bad times, when you show your ass. The crucial factor is: Do you have a strong relationship that will help you survive the rough times, and can you be respectful of the other as you move through those rough times? There will be times when you have to protect your interests (or your agent will need to protect your interests), and you may need to have difficult conversations. You DO want to be a proactive author, but not a nuisance or a burden. Here are a few questions to help determine if you're being high-maintenance. - Does the conversation/communication revolve around YOUR needs and YOUR demands, or is it a mutually beneficial discussion, where you come together to find a solution? Remember, so much depends upon flexibility and compromise.
- Are you placing blame, pointing the finger, or making excuses? Or are you attempting to find a way to move forward, to make the future bright?
- Are you trying to force someone to agree with you, or get them to admit they've done you wrong? (Hint: That's the road to nowhere. No one likes a guilt trip or admitting they were wrong.)
- Is your thought process something like: They're against me, they don't understand me, they're trying to cheat me? Or can you see other perspectives? Have you understood the approach of the publisher or editor or agent? And do you understand your own role in the game (or drama, as the case might be)?
Bottom line: Your conversations-requests-questions should be and feel like part of a partnership. People inside the business love nothing better than strong author partnerships—and happy authors. We want to make you happy if we can. We know that happy authors lead to better books and lead to better sales. And of course we all share that goal: Great books that sell. Sometimes it's helpful to be reminded we have that common goal, if different ways of achieving it. General | Getting Published
8/12/2008 5:30:23 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, August 11, 2008
Another Review of the WDB/BEA Conference
Posted by Jane
 It's a little bit after the fact, but there's a lengthy and well-informed recap of one writer's experience at our 2008 WDB/BEA Writers Conference, from writer Rachel Olivier. An excerpt: I looked through the biographies and found one agent who looked
promising to me, if not now, at least in the future. There were also a
couple of others I was interested in. I sidled into line behind other
writers who stood where my “dream” agent’s name appeared at the table
nervously reviewing what I might say. The session was going to start at
3 pm sharp. Coordinators had stopwatches and bells at the ready after
reiterating the instructions. But there was a glitch and a delay. The
agent I was going to pitch to had not come to the conference after all,
having taken sick on the plane before it took off. (Yes, she was on the
plane, on the runway, when she got violently ill and had to be taken
off the plane.) Therefore, we were going to be pitching to her
assistant, who was running around making sure the rest of the agents in
this, er, agency were settled.
Read the full version over at Mike's Writing Newsletter. (You have to scroll down for it.) Conferences/Events | Getting Published
8/11/2008 11:07:09 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, August 06, 2008
WritersDigest.tv
Posted by Jane
General | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends
8/6/2008 3:59:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, August 05, 2008
Recap: Willamette Writers (and My New Philosophy for Pitch Feedback)
Posted by Jane
 I am long overdue in sharing some tidbits from my trip to the Willamette Writers Conference last weekend in Portland (Ore.). Here's an overview. Lunch talk by author Christina Katz
WD author Christina Katz delivered Friday's excellent lunch talk; for me, her message was very much about how a writer's attitude and perspective can greatly affect success, and emphasized the many wonderful ways that writers have it better than ever (more ways to get information, more ways to network with other writers, more ways to see your book sold and promoted in the world, and so on). Read Christina's recap of the conference (which includes a photo of yours truly).My talk on The World of Sales
Unlike my previous presentations on this topic that only ran 45–60 minutes, this session was a full 90 minutes. I wondered if I would have enough to say to fill the time, but there were many excellent questions from the audience that helped add valuable discussion, and will certainly inspire some future presentations I give. A few topics that really interested writers: - Marketing and publicity efforts by you vs. your publisher. How do you prepare? How do you work with a publicist? Should you hire your own publicist? (The answer is yes.) What does hiring a publicist cost and what can you reasonably expect from a good publicist? FYI: Industry studies have shown that authors who hire publicists do in fact sell more books!
- How authors can positively affect sell-through numbers. While your publisher may do an excellent job selling your book INTO stores, those books can be returned at any time, for any reason, resulting in a negative number on your royalty statement! So what can authors do to ensure their books sell THROUGH stores into customer's hands? A lot depends on an author's ability to drive traffic to retail outlets to buy books (that is: marketing platform). Think about how you reach readers and how you can grow your direct contact with your readership.
- How authors can find book sales numbers. Unfortunately, you can't. There is a service, Nielsen Bookscan, that tracks book sales through most trade channels (bookstores), but this service is only available to publishers and other members of a fairly exclusive club. You can, however, check a book's copyright page to see what printing it's in. If it's been reprinted many times and it's not very old/dated, that's a sign of a good-selling book. You can also tell how successful a book is by how many copies a chain bookstore stocks at any given time. The more copies on the shelf, the better it sells.
- How often do authors earn out their advance? Actually, no one asked this question during the session, but I did get it afterwards, and it's a very popular topic. I see varying statistics in the industry (e.g., as few as 10% of authors earn out), but definitely the large majority of authors do NOT earn out their advance. That means whatever you're paid upfront is all you will ever receive—no royalties!
My New Philosophy for Pitch Feedback
Most of my conference time was spent taking appointments with writers who were interested in pitching a book for F+W Media. For the most part, the pitches were solid, though most people aren't as familiar with the F+W list as I would like (otherwise they would be spinning their concepts in a different way). After this three-weekend conference extravaganza of pitches and critiques, I've learned something valuable about giving feedback to authors on nonfiction book concepts. Here it is. - I know my F+W categories so intimately that as soon as I hear an idea (within 5 seconds), I know if it's viable, at least on the surface. I know if it's a marketable idea given our strengths or market position at F+W.
- HOWEVER: If I don't think an idea will work, I should NOT respond by saying: "No, that won't work for us" or "That won't sell" (which sparks: "But I know so many people who need this book" or "Everyone tells me this is a great idea" or "I know I could sell it.").
- Instead, my strategy is this: "Let's discuss what's selling in this category right now." Or: "Let's discuss the audiences that F+W can reach right now and how this book could target them." Or: "If that title were on our list at F+W, it would need to overcome these market challenges."
This accomplishes three very important things: - First, it gives people hope, as well as thoughtful consideration from me, that their idea could potentially work. No one, no matter how professional, wants to hear a "no" five seconds after an idea is uttered. It's kind of like: Let's give love a chance here.
- It focuses discussion on the market for the idea rather than the idea itself. This might seem like a small difference, but it's a crucial one. By doing this, no one is saying the idea isn't workable or valuable. We're talking about how the market works, and if there's a big enough market—or if F+W can even reach the intended market. It helps the author think about the project in terms of audience, instead of just their gem of an idea (which they're likely passionate about, and should be!).
- Finally, this helps educate the prospective author about F+W, about the category, and what typically works in the market. We all want to be successful, right? No author wants a book to be published that only sells a handful of copies. Plus, a discussion like this, with the right information or examples, usually spark ideas for how the author could spin the topic to make it appropriate for our list.
Finally, keynote speaker Marc Acito rode a bike through Saturday night's banquet! Video below. See his blog post here.
Conferences/Events | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Marketing & Self-Promotion
8/5/2008 5:15:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Saturday, July 26, 2008
Recap (Day 3): Midwest Writers Workshop
Posted by Jane
It's the third and final day of the Midwest Writers Workshop! It started with the traditional buttonhole breakfast, where each faculty member hosts a table with a specific topic. My Buttonhole Topic: Online Marketing and PromotionI spent a couple hours (over some excellent scrambled eggs and coffee, good job BSU catering!) talking about the basics of online author marketing and promotion. The key points that came up again and again: - Yes, an author Web site is mandatory if you're publishing a book. At what point does it become critical? When people start to search for you online (e.g., through Google), wanting more information about who you are and what you do. You don't want them to come up empty handed. In some categories/audiences, if you don't exist online, it's like you don't exist at all.
- A Web site doesn't have to cost you money or be flashy to be effective. How can you figure it out? Go to conferences or writers groups and ask others how they did it.
- No, you don't have to blog, but if you do, make sure you maintain it and feature something useful to your readership.
- The time you spend on online marketing/promotion efforts directly relates to who your audience is. For example, if you're a YA author, then you must spend a lot of time being visible online and promoting online. But if you're marketing to a readership that is not Web savvy, then spend less time online (but you're not off the hook—industry professionals and media professionals will still look for you online).
- Social networking is fun, but not mandatory. I recommend trying it, just to eliminate the fear or ignorance factor. You don't have to continue doing it if it seems unproductive or unfun. If you're trying to reach a younger audience, social networking probably is an essential element of your online marketing.
- Effective marketing (whether online or offline) is that perfect combination of (1) your strengths (2) your audience's needs and (3) the best fit for your content. This leads to authentic and worthwhile marketing efforts.
The Times They Are A-Changin'In the afternoon, I talked about how the publishing world is becoming format- and platform-agnostic, meaning it's all about content, and not the vehicle for the content. Furthermore, there can be more lucrative earning opportunities in other forms of media that are personalized and immediate, such as seminars and events. I quoted Seth Godin before, and I'll quote him again: "The book is becoming the souvenir." Evening Keynote by Jeff StoneA remarkable and delightful children's author. Highlights from his talk: - No. 1 Rule: Have fun. If you don't have fun writing it, no one will have fun reading it.
- Good idea: Write what you know. Better idea: Write what you want to know.
- If you're stuck in your story, do something you've always wanted to do (sail a boat, ride a horse, etc).
- You have to be able to talk about your work and pitch it (condense it).
Finally—I'm Left Speechless
Right before the keynote address, Alan Garinger (from the MWW committee) announced that, in addition to their annual writing awards (Manny Awards & the R. Karl Largent Prize), they were presenting the infrequent and prestigious Dorothy Hamilton Award, which I wasn't familiar with (and I've been attending for six years, so it really is infrequent). As Alan started describing the recipient (a person who had been attending for six years, was a publishing industry insider … well … ) … I am still speechless.  My enormous gratitude to everyone on the MWW committee—Jama, Alan, Ron,
Earl, Barb, Charlotte, Cathy, Holly (and I know others I'm missing here, forgive me!)—who are so loving and generous. It's an incredible blessing to be given an award for doing something that I love and cherish immensely. Thank you very, very much. You're all like family. Postscript (after recovering my faculties!)Now that I've recovered (a little), here's what I would've said about this very touching gesture. To the MWW committee, to MWW faculty, to MWW attendees (of the past six years): thank you, thank you, thank you. Perhaps you believe you are the lucky ones, but any generosity I've offered at MWW has come back to me a thousandfold. I go every year with an open heart, and I find myself unbelievably enriched upon my return home. Anyone who has attended this event knows what I'm talking about; it has the power to change lives, and I always experience people (writers, faculty, and committee members) who touch me indelibly. Again: Thank you. Conferences/Events | Getting Published | Marketing & Self-Promotion
7/26/2008 7:25:32 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Friday, July 25, 2008
Recap (Day 2): Midwest Writers Workshop
Posted by Jane
This morning I met with writers for manuscript critiques. The most common problem? Too much detail and explanation in the openingThat means too much telling and showing. (Do we really need to watch your character move slowly from one place to another, each movement, each gesture, each breath? That's not building momentum. That's usually called boring.) Carefully consider if each detail or action needs to be specifically conveyed. (Is it OK if it is only implied?) Here's a challenge I presented to three different writers: Can you take your first five pages, and condense into 1 page? 1 paragraph? What happens? What stays, what goes? Is it stronger? A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Midwest Writers WorkshopBill Fitzhugh delivered the lunch keynote. Highlights of his talk: - There are still dry counties in Mississippi.
- Remember to do the research.
- It's mostly hard work, but sometimes 10,000 butterflies come in through the window, then they leave. And you work to make that happen again.
In the afternoon, I once again delivered my session on crafting a saleable nonfiction book concept that will attract the attention of agents and editors. ( You can go here to download the PowerPoint presentation as PDF file.) If you attended the MWW session and still need the handouts (three pages total), then e-mail me at wdbooks@fwpubs.com, and I'll send them to you as PDF files. Conferences/Events | Craft & Technique | Getting Published
7/25/2008 6:09:32 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Thursday, July 24, 2008
Recap (Day 1): Midwest Writers Workshop
Posted by Jane
This morning I arrived in Muncie, Ind., in time for my lunch talk on "The World of Sales" (or how publishers sell books into stores/retailers and to distributors/wholesalers). The World of Sales talkWithin the first five minutes, I'd delivered the first hard truth about book publishing (or book sales): all books sold to bookstores are sold on a returnable basis—meaning the books can be returned to the publisher at any time, for any reason. So it's important to distinguish between "sell-in" (how many copies are initially sold into stores) and "sell-through" (how many copies actually sell through the register into readers' hands). Quick intermission (death-bed advice to writers)During the introduction of conference faculty, we were each asked to give one piece of advice to writers if it were the last thing we would ever be able to say on the matter. The themes? - perseverance (my answer)
- keep writing, get it done
- believe in yourself
- forget the market, write your own book
- get the words right
How to Get the Most Out of a Writer's Workshop Author Shirley Jump delivered the evening keynote. She has charming promotional cards that I didn't realize were promotional cards when I first saw them. One one side, it says, WRITER AT WORK Do Not Disturb Note: Will make exceptions for those bearing contracts, chocolates, or margaritas.
On the other side: Picture of Shirley and web site address. Brilliant! Highlights of her advice: - Always be professional. You'll be bumping into agents or editors; you don't where such a meeting will eventually lead. You are interviewing for the job of author.
- Be extroverted even if not by nature. Talk to everyone you can; you're among like people. Network. You need contacts.
- Don't sell yourself (pitch to editors/agents) unless you're asked to.
- Sleep when you get home. Attend everything, go to everything, both formal and informal. (And do the eat-there-stay-there option if available.)
- Take a day to follow-up after the conference; send thank-yous.
- Take time afterward to note what excites you most, then act on it.
Tomorrow: a full day of breakout sessions! ( Click here to view the MWW schedule.) Conferences/Events | Getting Published
7/24/2008 6:48:05 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Saturday, July 19, 2008
Recap: Harriette Austin Writers Conference
Posted by Jane
I always love journeying to the South for a writing event; aside from getting to hear the regular and charming "Yes, ma'am" near and far, I never have to sigh over yet another ubiquitous conference cheesecake. Here, I get to choose among blackberry cobbler, banana pudding, and apple pie! But down to business. Here at Harriette Austin, Saturday was a full day of workshops and one-on-one critiques; unfortunately I didn't have a window to attend other sessions. But I do have a few tips based on my manuscript critiques—I read the first 15 manuscript pages of eight different novels. The same red flags appeared again and again. Big Red Flags in First 15 Pages- No clear protagonist-problem. Of the manuscripts I read, only two had a very clear protagonist with an identifiable problem. For most first-time novelists, this is a requirement for a story beginning. Also, several manuscripts had more than three POV characters in first 15 pages, which can create a dizzying experience for the reader. It's a big risk.
- Slow start. About half of the manuscripts I read had very slow starts, where the story was mainly taking place in the characters' heads, or it suffered from too much backstory too soon. Resist the temptation to flashback or give a lot of detail about the past; move the story forward instead, and weave in the backstory (only as absolutely required) as you go. I recommend Hooked by Les Edgerton to help refine your first few chapters.
- In two manuscripts I read, the authors were trying to position their work as fiction, but it was clearly a true-to-life story. In both cases, the authors felt their stori
| |