# Sunday, November 01, 2009
Looking for Your Feedback: What Do Established Writers Need?
Posted by Jane



One of the biggest criticisms or complaints about Writer's Digest (usually the magazine) is that it's for wannabes, and that after a few years, the advice/information either becomes repetitive or irrelevant, especially for someone who works at the professional level.

I've been daydreaming about how to develop a new periodical that would offer information and insights for advanced, established, or professional writers/authors, and remain relevant even after achieving publication. (Just to be sure, such a periodical would not serve to replace the current magazine.)

But I need your help to get it right—or to ensure there's a need for it in the first place!
  • What you would need or want in such a publication?
  • What regular columns?
  • What features?
  • Whose viewpoints?
  • What topics?
Leave your recommendations in the comments. (If it appears your comment doesn't stick the first time you submit it, try inputting the code again—your comment will still be in the field, waiting for verification.)

Or, click here to e-mail me.


Photo credit: Marvin (PA)


General | WD Magazine
Sunday, November 01, 2009 6:30:47 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [11] Trackback
# Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Are You Annoyed When Told to Visit a Website (While Reading Print)?
Posted by Jane



I received my first piece of reader mail in response to my article "Straight Expectations" in WD's March/April 2009 issue, which gives the official Writer's Digest stance on whether or not writers should self-publish. (The conclusion, of course, is that it depends on your goals and expectations from publishing.)

As part of our self-publishing feature package, we told readers they could find information on 60 self-publishing services at our site.

Leonard R. Cook from Goleta, California, sent me a snail-mail letter, saying:
ABC, and I suspect CBS and NBC, have a rather annoying ploy of, instead of telling it like it is, referring one to their website. Actually, the BBC also has one and I believe they began theirs because of the network news ploy. They thought they were missing out on something. So they don't tell the news story. They advertise the story and then presumably detail it on their website. I've never looked to find out.

In your article, you refer to 60 self-publishers on your website, where more information is just a click away. Why? Since you publish a magazine, why is "more information just a click away." Why isn't information "right here"? Does the information get contaminated if it's printed in your magazine? Do you get some kind of royalty if a reader puts down his magazine, goes over to his table, turns on his computer, searches for your website, and then scans the information? Or do two pages cost that much to print?

I don't know about you, but when I watch the TV newscasts, I don't surf the web at the same time. It could appear to be a case of laziness on my part, or on the other hand, what does it appear to be on your part? I've broached this question to several media persons with the same response, nothing!
This letter raises many issues I could address, but first I'll start with a direct answer to Leonard's question of why we didn't print this information in the magazine. There are two key reasons:
  • We do have limited space in our print publication, and it is in fact expensive to add pages. Print is precious, and we felt we had better things to offer in print.
  • We decided that information of this type is better delivered online, so you can click right through to any of these service's Web sites, or save the information on your computer for later access. This information is also likely to go out-of-date quickly, so having it online means we can revise it.
But there are also more wide-ranging reasons for magazines to direct people to their sites, and Leonard mentions one (the so-called royalty):
  • Magazine readers who go online indicates a very engaged and involved readership, which is attractive to both print and online advertisers.
  • Generating traffic on our website has many benefits (whether the traffic comes from print readers or online searchers); it helps us generate advertising revenue, and also brings us more readers in the long term (people who find our content online and decide they want the print product too)
  • For regular readers of this blog, it goes without saying that print is endangered. Relying on print is a doomed business model, but it's not enough to simply mimic what you have in print in an online setting. They are two different mediums or vehicles. Each should be a distinct experience and not try to replicate the other.
That said, I am sympathetic to Leonard's complaint that lots of good content is being pushed online rather than presented in print. As a subscriber to about a dozen magazines, I do have a little inner cringe every time I start reading a print magazine and see plentiful references to great online exclusive interviews, videos, etc. I'm annoyed, but not so much because it exists—more because I don't have that much time. There's no way I'm going to cover everything. I have noticed, though, if I'm really interested in exploring a topic or piece further, I love it if a publication provides a way for me to go online and get more.

On a final note, there are definitely some generational differences at work here. For example, I don't own a TV today, but when I did, I would regularly be working on the laptop while watching news, entertainment, anything. I wonder what percentage of people today can still watch television while NOT Twittering, or surfing Facebook, or browsing sites.

I hope one day Leonard reads this response to his letter. He didn't include an e-mail address, only his phone number. I'm definitely not going to call, and blogging about his letter is a better use of time (a community opportunity that benefits many)—rather than responding to him alone. I have a feeling many of his questions would be answered if he experienced the manner of my response.

Photo credit: DWZ

Digitization & New Technology | Self-Publishing | WD Magazine
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:19:01 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [2] Trackback
# Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Do Writers' Futures Lie in Indie E-Publishing Platforms?
Posted by Jane



The March/April issue of Writer’s Digest magazine hits newsstands in the week ahead; its feature package focuses on self-publishing. While the issue touches on all forms of self-publishing—print as well as digital/electronic—we could do an entire issue devoted to the evolving models for online or digital self-publishing.

We also closed the issue before the partnership announcement between Stanza and Smashwords. You’re probably thinking, Why do I care about the partnership of two companies I’ve never heard of?

True, it wasn’t until I had an iPhone that I became really aware of these two companies and understood what was happening.

Here are the basics:
  • The iPhone is a mobile device that’s used by nearly 20 million people.
  • Stanza is a popular e-book reader you can use on your iPhone (you download it for free directly from your phone).
  • Smashwords is a self-publishing company that publishes e-books only. You can use their service without any upfront cost, plus you can make your book available for as little or as much as you want (even for free).
  • Smashwords + Stanza means your self-published work can be available to millions of people, or at least the 1 million people who have downloaded the Stanza application onto their iPhones, as of January 2009.
Big-picture, what does this mean for writers? We’re starting to see the eradication of distribution barriers to self-published works. If authors can effectively spread the word about their work, then it can be quickly, easily, and inexpensively downloaded on a very popular device.

I find it intoxicating. All of this is quite new, but also instantly transformative. Smashwords debuted in early 2008; Stanza became available on the iPhone in July 2008. (You can see the impact Stanza has had on the reading and publishing community by reviewing the headlines on their news page.)

So I took some time to talk on the phone with Smashwords founder, Mark Coker, as well as Lexcycle’s COO, Neelan Choksi. Here’s some of what they had to say.


Interview with Mark Coker at Smashwords




I’m just now realizing the power of the iPhone and Stanza. I admit, I didn’t really comprehend the e-book universe until recently.

Stanza has become a really powerful reading platform. If you talk to core e-book reading enthusiasts, they'll tell you that the iPhone is nothing new, but I think what we're starting to see is we're expanding beyond those early adopters to the mainstream. Especially with Oprah talking about the Kindle, that opens people's eyes.

Reading on paper is a prejudice we're up against. But when people try it, they have a wow moment, kind of this religious experience. My first experience with the Kindle was on Waikiki beach … and I brought it on my vacation, and I booted it up, and I went to the bookstore, and I downloaded samples of different books. It was easy and within 10 minutes I had purchased my first book. You can bring the bookstore anywhere, you can bring your library anywhere, and you can have your book your way.

E-books still only account for about 1% of all book sales, probably less. There's a lot of upside—it's going to happen, it's going to continue to grow in a big way, regardless of what happens with the traditional print industry.

What we're seeing with e-books is what we saw with blogging several years ago—the same prejudices in the media, but we saw what happened in the blogosphere. There are a lot of talented people in the world, and until some of these technologies came along, they just did not have a voice or a chance to show their talent.

A lot of writers or authors ask me: Will they be able to earn the same kind of living if e-books start to replace traditional print book sales?

Writing is going to become more profitable for more authors. Even if e-books continue to become widely successful, print books aren't going to go away. The authors that are currently successful in print will continue to be successful in print. If you look at the current book industry supply chain, from author to reader, it’s author-agent-editor-publisher-packager-distributor-warehouser-bookstore. There are a lot of costs associated with that supply chain. It's a big cost to ship dead trees. There are a lot of costs that can be cut when you go digital. The costs of producing a digital book, or the costs of producing one more copy, are zero. If the book is going to be professionally edited and vetted by an editor, there are still those costs. But when you eliminate all these other costs, like returns, you can dramatically lower the cost of the book to the customer and at the same time dramatically increase the profitability to the publisher or the author.

Another thing that gets me excited about Smashwords is the lower cost of books. Most of the books are $3, many are free. Print books averaging $14.95 are unaffordable to the vast majority of people on this earth. It's really cool to think that if we can lower the cost of books, then we can lower the barrier to unleash a new era of literacy and culture and information sharing.

We'll always have commercial books and we need them, and we need a way for authors to profit from their works.

Longer term, like a year or two, my hope is that Smashwords will start attracting some established authors who choose to go the independent route for their next book or choose to keep the digital rights and publish it on their own.

For authors who choose to self-publish, are e-books a better option?

Print is a very important format. Authors should provide to the consumer whatever the consumer wants to have. Authors should continue to publish in print and also publish in a digital format.

The biggest threat facing all authors is obscurity. This is another exciting thing about digital books, making them accessible in an entirely different way. I think is print wonderful—but they're different things.

Books have always been sold via word of mouth. The Internet is an ideal word of mouth tool. We've added simple things to make it easy for people to share their books on social networks. If the book is truly great, it can find an audience.

In the next five years, I think it's fair to say we're going to see fewer bookstores out there. As bookstores disappear, it reduces exposure opportunities for authors who are lucky enough to be part of that system. And it also hurts publishers. It's happening already today—we're going to see fewer bookstores, few publishers, and publishers publishing few books, at least under the traditional system. So I think we're going to see publishers making more interesting use of digital, more use of POD, and more authors aspiring to be independent from the beginning.

Our focus as a digital publishing platform is to provide all authors the tools they need to publish, promote, and sell their books and we hope that it’s an enabling force to unleash a torrent of new talented content out there. I can't stress it enough, though: Authors need to be realistic. This is not a get-rich quick thing. It's always been difficult to sell a book, and as an indie author, it's even more difficult. Authors who invest their time and energy into this will be rewarded for it.


Interview with Neelan Choksi, COO of Lexcycle (creator of Stanza)




I see a lot about reader response and awareness of e-books, but I wonder if writers or authors also understand what’s happening, and are using the iPhone and Stanza?


The writers are pretty cognizant of what's going on, or at least they're learning about it. There's enough mainstreaming of what's happened. As soon as you get Oprah talking about the Kindle and by extension e-books, you've just mainstreamed the whole thing. I do believe that writers are very aware of it, and it may be going from genre to genre at different paces. For example, sci-fi and romance, as is often the case, are leading the charge. We first read about Stanza and romance on someone's blog; they had gotten an early edition from an author using Stanza on their iPhone. That’s one example; there's a lot of examples, where individuals are starting to figure it out.

We get pretty regular e-mails or calls or conversations with authors. With Random House, there's a promotion happening and a bunch of others are doing the same promotion. They went to about a half dozen of their authors and said: We can make your backlist titles available on Stanza for free, plus an excerpt of your upcoming book for free, and it will be a way of getting new readers learning about you as an author. Cory Doctorow made that model unbelievably famous.

And example of another conversation I had with an author—with everything that's happening in the big houses from a publishing perspective—there's all of this upheaval. Part of what's happening is that the blockbuster authors will always get the attention of the publishers, but there's a level that now just aren't. More than 300,000 copies of this author’s book will sell, and his comment was that he didn't believe his next book was going to get the attention from his publisher. He was thinking about creating his own publishing house. I mentioned Smashwords to him, here's a really interesting model. How many books would you have had to sell with your original publisher to make the same money as you would with Smashwords?

Some big author is going to go this indie route, either as a threat, or as something they truly believe in. Someone's going to do it simply because the numbers make sense.

None of this would have happened if digital publishing hadn't reached this inflection point. The numbers still aren't that big ($44 million sold in the United States), and aren't particularly compelling when compared to the traditional industry. But I think a million isn't a number that anyone expected us to have at this point.

Can you give any insight into what genres or categories are selling the best through Stanza onto the iPhone?

I fully expect the breakdown to look just like the rest of America’s book sales. Right now, there's a lot of interest in politics and government and Obama.

Remember this company is about a year old. The desktop version of Stanza for Mac was basically supposed to take content and covert and upload it to a Kindle, primarily for people's personal documents. The iPhone Stanza app released in July 2008 with just free books—a strategic decision because we felt there would be push back. … We thought the best thing was to put no barriers in the way of adoption.

What’s been the biggest surprise for you?

We had no anticipation we would hit 1 million downloads in 5.5 months. The adoption has probably been one of the biggest surprises of all.

The industry itself right now is in a situation that all ships rise with the tide. Maybe really the surprise was how much marketing Amazon was going to do, how much marketing Sony was going to do, and all of the new devices that are coming out. … It just feels like there's so much momentum behind it.

Also, one of our most commented on features is the simple fact that when you reopen Stanza on iPhone, it takes you right back to the last page you were on and the last book you were in. You don't have a problem with reading five pages worth of material while standing the grocery store line. You get immediately back to where you were, and you know as soon as you shut it down or take a call, you know when you open up Stanza, you'll go back to that same spot. It's a bookmark essentially.

We've done a survey on our site and the primary places that people read using stanza are (1) bed (2) commuting (3) waiting areas.

That was a big surprise for a lot of people, iPhone use in bed.

—————

I'd love your comments about your experience either reading e-books or writing/selling/promoting e-books. What's most exciting about it, and if you're a writer, what causes you the most worry?

Digitization & New Technology | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Self-Publishing | WD Magazine
Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:36:51 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [2] Trackback
# Monday, January 12, 2009
Will You Be at the Presidential Inauguration? Write & Publish About It
Posted by Jane



The March/April 2009 issue of Writer's Digest magazine (which will soon be available to subscribers and on-sale at newsstands) focuses on self-publishing, and includes mention of some innovative publishing models that are starting to heat up. One of them is WeBook, which is a little difficult to explain (they call it "the home of community-sourced books), but here's a perfect example of the power of this model:

WeBook, in honor of the presidential inauguration, is publishing a collection of Obama inauguration stories, "told by real people in their own words." You can submit your story anytime between January 20, 2009 – Midnight EST January 21, 2009, at WeBook.com, and WeBook wil publish the book within two weeks using digital printing by CreateSpace (an Amazon company), and sell it for $9.99. All profits from the project are donated to 826 National, and WeBook is asking contributors to the collection to donate their royalties as well.

Clikc here for the full detail.

You have to sign-up with WeBook to submit your story for consideration, and if your story is selected, you'll have to sign a publishing agreement stipulating how you will be paid and what rights are being purchased. (I was not able to find a copy of such an agreement, but be sure to read any publishing contract carefully before signing.)

Digitization & New Technology | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Self-Publishing | WD Magazine
Monday, January 12, 2009 2:14:09 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
# Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Announcing the New Editor of Writer's Digest Magazine
Posted by Jane

Jessica-Strawser-2.jpgWhen I first joined the Writer's Digest community in 2001, I had the great pleasure of having Jessica Strawser as a colleague on Writer's Digest magazine. Our paths diverged after a couple years, but now we're working together once again on this publication that brings out our most heartfelt enthusiasm and creativity.

During her first turn at Writer's Digest, Jessica contributed and edited monthly magazine columns about writing successes, critiques, and careers, and also served as executive editor of multiple special issues (such as the ever-popular Writer's Yearbook). Since her leave from the magazine, she's had experience in marketing and public relations, online writing and editing, and book publishing, most recently as managing editor for North Light Books.

Fans of Writer's Digest magazine, as well as future fans, have much to look forward to. Jessica has a passion and expertise for the writing community that's accompanied by a fresh perspective and a curiosity essential for our continuing mission to be the most informative and trusted source for writers.

Please join me in welcoming Jessica: a fellow writer and a fellow editor (and, it must be said, fellow book lover).



General | WD Magazine
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 4:04:46 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [8] Trackback
# Thursday, October 23, 2008
Writer's Digest Subscribers vs. Newsstand Buyers
Posted by Jane

Everyone has offered such wonderful comments on the magazine covers that I wanted to share/review some of them:

Mary Ulrich comments:
I would think you have two audiences, the subscribers and the people who will buy WD off the shelves.  The first sample has more of the "Entertainment tonight" appeal and might hook the McGafferty fans to an impulse purchase. As a subscriber I like number 2 or 3 because I am most interested in the "craft" articles and like a creative drawing. …

In the Dec. issue of WD, in the small print on the bottom of page 2, it says that WD is "a bimonthly publication".  Last issue I was confused to receive the December issue at the beginning of October. So WD is published bimonthly, 6 X a year, or quarterly?


First, to answer Mary's question: WD magazine is published 6x/year. I'm not sure why, up until this point, we haven't clarified this by labeling the cover with "November/December", "January/February" and so on. Something for me to research!

But to get to the real point: Mary hits on a perplexing issue that Writer's Digest magazine faces: the difference between what would be appealing to many of our subscribers (usually more advanced writers) and people who buy the magazine off newsstand—the type of person we usually label as the "aspiring writer" or the "dreamer," though all great writers are dreamers (even still aspiring) to some extent.

WD's circulation department has sales information that supports using an author photo on the cover because photos perform better than illustrations on the newsstand. Of course, what subscribers would prefer is a gray area, but based on the small sampling of comments here, it does appear that people who have read the magazine for a while tend to favor the illustrated cover.

However, it's hard to overlook the truth behind these comments:
A writer on the cover makes me connect as opposed to some abstract art. (PatriciaW)

The picture on the front cover of real people who struggled to write and enjoyed every bit of their struggle, touches my heart most and gives me the motivation I need as an aspiring writer. Their success to be featured on the cover speaks more words than any art could reflect. Art and cartoon could work for specific topics inside the magazine, but real people appeal more to the majority of would be writers. (Amina)

The first one absolutely caught me. I didn't know who Megan McCafferty was, but it didn't matter to me, as the "Write Your Novel in 2009" was much the clearest on that page, and that was what grabbed me. (Deb)

I generally tend to believe that writers who buy off newsstand are initially pulled in by the photo (they connect with the human face -- this is probably subconscious -- even if they don't recognize the face), but don't buy the issue unless the cover lines really deliver on a benefit or dream the writer has -- in this case, to write a novel.

As for subscribers, I can only hope they continue to renew because of great content, and generally overlook covers meant to appeal to newsstand buyers?

It's a big challenge for us to tackle in 2009 and beyond.


WD Magazine
Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:01:27 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
# Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Which Writer's Digest Magazine Would You Buy?
Posted by Jane

We're putting the finishing touches on the January/February 2009 issue of Writer's Digest, and have four very different options for the cover.

Which one do you like best?
And which featured story looks most exciting to you?


WD-1.jpg

WD-2.jpg

WD-3.jpg

WD-4.jpg


WD Magazine
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:09:27 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [18] Trackback
# Thursday, October 02, 2008
Writer's Digest Magazine: 2009 Editorial Calendar
Posted by Jane

WD-mag.jpg

Everyone has been so helpful in giving feedback on magazine content, so here's a sneak peek at our issue themes for the coming year. This is a very broad-stroke outline, but gives you a sense of our focus each issue.

If there's a particular technique, topic, or area that you've always hoped we'd cover, let me know!


April 2009
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SELF PUBLISHING
  • The new perception of self-publishing; emerging tools and models
  • Resource chart on POD companies (what they offer, fees, rights, etc.) and reader feedback on self-publishing experiences.
WORKBOOK: Revision and Self-Editing
  • How to turn a first draft into a salable manuscript
  • When and how to work with freelancers to get a book into shape

June 2009
GET KNOWN BEFORE THE BOOK DEAL (MARKETING & PROMOTION ISSUE)
  • How to market and promote yourself before and after you make the sale
  • The most effective way to use social networking tools to sell yourself & your book
  • Hands-on guide to online viral marketing tools (blog tours, book trailers, reading groups, podcasts)
WORKBOOK: Writing Memoirs and Life Stories (when you’re not a name)


August 2009
PUBLISHING 101: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU WRITE A WORD
  • Visual guide to how your book moves from proposal to print to on the shelf—all the steps, all the things you need to know ahead of time
  • What to expect from your publisher (editorial, marketing, publicity)
  • How the industry has changed and new steps you need to take to ensure successful publication
WORKBOOK: The Art & Craft of Storytelling; Hooking Your Reader From Page One


October 2009
AGENTS AND EDITORS SPEAK OUT (THE GATEKEEPER ISSUE)
  • The new roles of gatekeepers and how to be an equal partner in publication
  • The anatomy of a book deal and a book contract: what you must know and ask about even if you do have an agent
WORKBOOK: Novel-writing related


December 2009
THE FUTURE OF PUBLISHING
  • The changing economic model of media and the emerging role of writers as content providers—five essential rules to follow to stay in the game
  • How to negotiate the smartest deal for digital rights and e-rights (and when to keep all such rights for yourself)
WORKBOOK: Writing Groups & Critique Group Guide; A Fresh Start in the New Year


WD Magazine
Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:09:39 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
# Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Your Feedback on Topics for Writer's Digest magazine
Posted by Jane

I thought you might be interested in reading some of the personal responses I received when I asked what you'd like to see in the magazine in 2009.

  • I'd like to see more focus on writing and editing fiction (less on other types of writing), and I'd love to see regular articles on innovative book promotion—not just the basics or the same things we've all read, but how to really promote your book—most especially novels, because they're not as obvious about how to promote them as non-fiction is.
  • As someone who is writing a non-fiction social history/reference guide, I would like to see more information about breaking into non-fiction for and by writers of non-fiction when one isn't a celebrity or "name."
  • What about including more stories from authors about their initial path to publication. Aspiring writers want to know how other writers got started. I think WD does a pretty good job of profiling bestselling authors, but I think aspiring writers want to hear more about numbers of rejections—in other words the struggle involved and how it ultimately paid off.
  • More news/features on alternative and self-publishing. Thanks to the Internet, the publishing industry is transforming right before our eyes. Today's writers have so many other options other than the traditional publishing routes, and I'd love to read more about these options. Everyone is always worrying about query writing and how to get an agent, when the Internet gives true self-publishers the marketing and distribution tools once reserved only for the big publishers.
  • I definitely vote for more on self-publishing. I don't see it as a "game" as much as an effective strategy to getting a formal book deal, if one desires it. That's what worked for me. I also see self-publishing as a strategy to experiment with new ideas to gauge the market response. Again, very effective and efficient for me to
    test out new ideas with my audience on a smaller scale and monitor impact,
    modify, what have you, before courting taking the idea that next step.
  • I hope the new technological tools you're planning to discuss will
    include podcasting.
Thanks to everyone who took time to comment both here on the blog and those of you who e-mailed me personally. Your input is invaluable in helping shape our direction!


WD Magazine
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:00:27 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback


Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links