Free Updates
Receive an email when new
posts are added!
Subscribe via RSS
Navigation
WritersDigest.com
Writer's Digest Books
Writer's Digest Bookstore
Writer's Market
Writer's Digest Online Workshops
Writer's Digest Forum
WD Conference Scene
WD-TV
Categories
Agents
Building Readership
Conferences/Events
Craft & Technique
Digitization & New Technology
Excerpts
F+W Life
Fun
General
Getting Published
Industry News & Trends
Marketing & Self-Promotion
New Titles From F+W
New Titles From Writer's Digest
Self-Publishing
Sneak Peek
WD Magazine
November, 2008 (8)
October, 2008 (13)
September, 2008 (24)
August, 2008 (27)
July, 2008 (26)
June, 2008 (34)
May, 2008 (36)
April, 2008 (2)
Search
Archives
<
November 2008
>
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
Blogroll
Alice's CWIM Blog
(for Children's Writer's & Illustrator's Market)
Guide to Literary Agents Blog
Living With the M-Word
Poetic Asides
Questions & Quandaries
The Writer's Perspective
This Writer's Life
WD Script Notes
Writing Resources
Writer's Digest
magazine
Writer's forum
Writing Books
WritersMarket.com
Writers Online Workshops
Writer's Digest Book Club
Thursday, June 26, 2008
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#4)
Posted by Jane
This shouldn't be news to you, but the Internet affects your ability to get published—whether for the first time or the second time. When editors/agents receive a query, proposal, or manuscript, they almost always Google the author, and check out the strength of the author's Web presence, reviews, and publication history (if any), and involvement with a particular community. Professionals can form an impression (and perhaps even reach a conclusion) before reading a word of the author’s actual manuscript, meaning:
#4 SABOTAGE: TREATING ONLINE AND MULTIMEDIA ACTIVITIES AS OPTIONAL
Often, the most efficient and effective way to reach a readership is online, through Web sites, blogs, interviews, discussion groups, etc. If you haven't noticed, today’s pop culture thrives on multimedia entertainment, the interactivity of social networks and messaging, and the instant shiny gratification of iPhones and search engines. Progressive publishers and authors must look beyond the power of words alone to stimulate readers.
As a smart acquisitions editor and editorial director, I have to search for projects that can go beyond the printed book. The F+W sales and marketing division is no longer satisfied with a great print product; I have to envision how the content can be shaped and promoted online, in digital formats, and through multimedia channels. My company will eventually cease being a book publisher and become a media/content company. Will you, as an author, be prepared? How will you and your content be defined or delivered in an online or digital environment?
Larger life lesson: It's not just about the culture any more (or "young" people), but the very way we consume and create knowledge. Our very brains are changing. (Read this article in
Atlantic
magazine,
Is Google Making Us Stupid?
)
Related posts
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#3)
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#2)
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#1)
Digitization & New Technology
|
General
|
Getting Published
6/26/2008 3:57:26 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Comments [1]
Trackback
Tracked by:
"How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#5)" (There Are No Rules)
[Trackback]
"Content Providers Will Survive. Will Authors?" (There Are No Rules)
[Trackback]
6/27/2008 7:29:27 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Whoa, there Nelly!
I've been on the horse for a very long time and you're galloping a bit to far...ahead.
Don't like this kind of talk. Don't like my work being called "content."
I can't imagine any writer I know who would thrill at the sound of that word.
Easy does it, there. S-l-o-w. D-o-w-n. You know I'm forward-minded...but this is a bit too forward for me.
The Writer Mama
|
writermamaAT NOSPAMearthlink dot net
Name
E-mail
Home page
Remember Me
Comment (HTML not allowed)
Enter the code shown (prevents robots):