<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>There Are No Rules - WD Magazine</title>
    <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/</link>
    <description>Jane Friedman's WD Blog</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>F+W Media, Inc.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:30:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>Jane.Friedman@fwpubs.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>Jane.Friedman@fwpubs.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/145052885_61c12c3608.jpg" border="0" height="307" width="412" />
        <br />
        <br />
One of the biggest criticisms or complaints about Writer's Digest (usually the magazine)
is that it's for wannabes, and that after a few years, the advice/information either
becomes repetitive or irrelevant, especially for someone who works at the professional
level.<br /><br />
I've been daydreaming about how to develop a new periodical that would offer information
and insights for advanced, established, or <u>professional</u> writers/authors, and
remain relevant even after achieving publication. (Just to be sure, such a periodical
would not serve to replace the current magazine.)<br /><br />
But I need your help to get it right—or to ensure there's a need for it in the first
place!<br /><ul><li>
What you would need or want in such a publication? 
</li><li>
What regular columns? 
</li><li>
What features?</li><li>
Whose viewpoints?</li><li>
What topics?</li></ul>
Leave your recommendations in the comments. (If it appears your comment doesn't stick
the first time you submit it, try inputting the code again—your comment will still
be in the field, waiting for verification.)<br /><br />
Or, <a href="mailto:jane.friedman@fwmedia.com?subject=Ideas%20for%20advanced%20magazine%20for%20writers">click
here to e-mail me</a>.<br /><br /><br /><font size="1"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mscolly/145052885/">Photo credit:
Marvin (PA)</a></font><br /><br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71" /></body>
      <title>Looking for Your Feedback: What Do Established Writers Need?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2009/11/01/LookingForYourFeedbackWhatDoEstablishedWritersNeed.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:30:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/145052885_61c12c3608.jpg" border="0" height="307" width="412"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of the biggest criticisms or complaints about Writer's Digest (usually the magazine)
is that it's for wannabes, and that after a few years, the advice/information either
becomes repetitive or irrelevant, especially for someone who works at the professional
level.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've been daydreaming about how to develop a new periodical that would offer information
and insights for advanced, established, or &lt;u&gt;professional&lt;/u&gt; writers/authors, and
remain relevant even after achieving publication. (Just to be sure, such a periodical
would not serve to replace the current magazine.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But I need your help to get it right—or to ensure there's a need for it in the first
place!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What you would need or want in such a publication? 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What regular columns? 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What features?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Whose viewpoints?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What topics?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Leave your recommendations in the comments. (If it appears your comment doesn't stick
the first time you submit it, try inputting the code again—your comment will still
be in the field, waiting for verification.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Or, &lt;a href="mailto:jane.friedman@fwmedia.com?subject=Ideas%20for%20advanced%20magazine%20for%20writers"&gt;click
here to e-mail me&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mscolly/145052885/"&gt;Photo credit:
Marvin (PA)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,7c841b97-3233-45d9-8f17-dd02e0681e71.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <p>
          </p>
          <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/67462572_f722d8de6a.jpg" border="0" height="410" width="307" />
          <br />
          <br />
I received my first piece of reader mail in response to my article "Straight Expectations"
in WD's March/April 2009 issue, which gives the official Writer's Digest stance on
whether or not writers should self-publish. (The conclusion, of course, is that it
depends on your goals and expectations from publishing.)<br /><br />
As part of our self-publishing feature package, we told readers they could find <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/directory-of-self-publishing-companies/">information
on 60 self-publishing services at our site</a>.<br /><br />
Leonard R. Cook from Goleta, California, sent me a snail-mail letter, saying:<br /><blockquote><font color="#0000ff">ABC, and I suspect CBS and NBC, have a rather annoying
ploy of, instead of telling it like it is, referring one to their website. Actually,
the BBC also has one and I believe they began theirs because of the network news ploy.
They thought they were missing out on something. So they don't tell the news story.
They advertise the story and then presumably detail it on their website. I've never
looked to find out.<br /><br />
In your article, you refer to 60 self-publishers on your website, where more information
is just a click away. Why? Since you publish a magazine, why is "more information
just a click away." Why isn't information "right here"? Does the information get contaminated
if it's printed in your magazine? Do you get some kind of royalty if a reader puts
down his magazine, goes over to his table, turns on his computer, searches for your
website, and then scans the information? Or do two pages cost that much to print?<br /><br />
I don't know about you, but when I watch the TV newscasts, I don't surf the web at
the same time. It could appear to be a case of laziness on my part, or on the other
hand, what does it appear to be on your part? I've broached this question to several
media persons with the same response, nothing!<br /></font></blockquote>This letter raises <u>many</u> issues I could address, but first
I'll start with a direct answer to Leonard's question of why we didn't print this
information in the magazine. There are two key reasons:<br /><ul><li>
We do have limited space in our print publication, and it is in fact expensive to
add pages. Print is precious, and we felt we had better things to offer in print.</li><li>
We decided that information of this type is better delivered online, so you can click
right through to any of these service's Web sites, or save the information on your
computer for later access. This information is also likely to go out-of-date quickly,
so having it online means we can revise it.</li></ul>
But there are also more wide-ranging reasons for magazines to direct people to their
sites, and Leonard mentions one (the so-called royalty):<br /><ul><li>
Magazine readers who go online indicates a very engaged and involved readership, which
is attractive to both print and online advertisers.</li><li>
Generating traffic on our website has many benefits (whether the traffic comes from
print readers or online searchers); it helps us generate advertising revenue, and
also brings us more readers in the long term (people who find our content online and
decide they want the print product too)</li><li>
For regular readers of this blog, it goes without saying that print is endangered.
Relying on print is a doomed business model, but it's not enough to simply mimic what
you have in print in an online setting. They are two different mediums or vehicles.
Each should be a distinct experience and not try to replicate the other.</li></ul>
That said, I am sympathetic to Leonard's complaint that lots of good content is being
pushed online rather than presented in print. As a subscriber to about a dozen magazines,
I do have a little inner cringe every time I start reading a print magazine and see
plentiful references to great online exclusive interviews, videos, etc. I'm annoyed,
but not so much because it exists—more because I don't have that much time. There's
no way I'm going to cover everything. I have noticed, though, if I'm really interested
in exploring a topic or piece further, I love it if a publication provides a way for
me to go online and get more.<br /><br />
On a final note, there are definitely some generational differences at work here.
For example, I don't own a TV today, but when I did, I would regularly be working
on the laptop while watching news, entertainment, anything. I wonder what percentage
of people today can still watch television while NOT Twittering, or surfing Facebook,
or browsing sites.<br /><br />
I hope one day Leonard reads this response to his letter. He didn't include an e-mail
address, only his phone number. I'm definitely not going to call, and blogging about
his letter is a better use of time (a community opportunity that benefits many)—rather
than responding to him alone. I have a feeling many of his questions would be answered
if he experienced the manner of my response.<br /><br /><font size="1"><i><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwz/67462572/">Photo credit:
DWZ</a></i></font><br /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64" />
      </body>
      <title>Are You Annoyed When Told to Visit a Website (While Reading Print)?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2009/02/25/AreYouAnnoyedWhenToldToVisitAWebsiteWhileReadingPrint.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:19:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/67462572_f722d8de6a.jpg" border="0" height="410" width="307"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I received my first piece of reader mail in response to my article "Straight Expectations"
in WD's March/April 2009 issue, which gives the official Writer's Digest stance on
whether or not writers should self-publish. (The conclusion, of course, is that it
depends on your goals and expectations from publishing.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As part of our self-publishing feature package, we told readers they could find &lt;a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/directory-of-self-publishing-companies/"&gt;information
on 60 self-publishing services at our site&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Leonard R. Cook from Goleta, California, sent me a snail-mail letter, saying:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;ABC, and I suspect CBS and NBC, have a rather annoying
ploy of, instead of telling it like it is, referring one to their website. Actually,
the BBC also has one and I believe they began theirs because of the network news ploy.
They thought they were missing out on something. So they don't tell the news story.
They advertise the story and then presumably detail it on their website. I've never
looked to find out.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In your article, you refer to 60 self-publishers on your website, where more information
is just a click away. Why? Since you publish a magazine, why is "more information
just a click away." Why isn't information "right here"? Does the information get contaminated
if it's printed in your magazine? Do you get some kind of royalty if a reader puts
down his magazine, goes over to his table, turns on his computer, searches for your
website, and then scans the information? Or do two pages cost that much to print?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't know about you, but when I watch the TV newscasts, I don't surf the web at
the same time. It could appear to be a case of laziness on my part, or on the other
hand, what does it appear to be on your part? I've broached this question to several
media persons with the same response, nothing!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;This letter raises &lt;u&gt;many&lt;/u&gt; issues I could address, but first
I'll start with a direct answer to Leonard's question of why we didn't print this
information in the magazine. There are two key reasons:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
We do have limited space in our print publication, and it is in fact expensive to
add pages. Print is precious, and we felt we had better things to offer in print.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
We decided that information of this type is better delivered online, so you can click
right through to any of these service's Web sites, or save the information on your
computer for later access. This information is also likely to go out-of-date quickly,
so having it online means we can revise it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
But there are also more wide-ranging reasons for magazines to direct people to their
sites, and Leonard mentions one (the so-called royalty):&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Magazine readers who go online indicates a very engaged and involved readership, which
is attractive to both print and online advertisers.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Generating traffic on our website has many benefits (whether the traffic comes from
print readers or online searchers); it helps us generate advertising revenue, and
also brings us more readers in the long term (people who find our content online and
decide they want the print product too)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
For regular readers of this blog, it goes without saying that print is endangered.
Relying on print is a doomed business model, but it's not enough to simply mimic what
you have in print in an online setting. They are two different mediums or vehicles.
Each should be a distinct experience and not try to replicate the other.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
That said, I am sympathetic to Leonard's complaint that lots of good content is being
pushed online rather than presented in print. As a subscriber to about a dozen magazines,
I do have a little inner cringe every time I start reading a print magazine and see
plentiful references to great online exclusive interviews, videos, etc. I'm annoyed,
but not so much because it exists—more because I don't have that much time. There's
no way I'm going to cover everything. I have noticed, though, if I'm really interested
in exploring a topic or piece further, I love it if a publication provides a way for
me to go online and get more.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On a final note, there are definitely some generational differences at work here.
For example, I don't own a TV today, but when I did, I would regularly be working
on the laptop while watching news, entertainment, anything. I wonder what percentage
of people today can still watch television while NOT Twittering, or surfing Facebook,
or browsing sites.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I hope one day Leonard reads this response to his letter. He didn't include an e-mail
address, only his phone number. I'm definitely not going to call, and blogging about
his letter is a better use of time (a community opportunity that benefits many)—rather
than responding to him alone. I have a feeling many of his questions would be answered
if he experienced the manner of my response.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="1"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwz/67462572/"&gt;Photo credit:
DWZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,0dbdb172-7ed6-430f-8fcb-97592e493d64.aspx</comments>
      <category>Digitization &amp; New Technology</category>
      <category>Self-Publishing</category>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p>
              </p>
              <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/Picture%202.png" border="0" />
              <br />
              <br />
The March/April issue of Writer’s Digest magazine hits newsstands in the week ahead;
its feature package focuses on self-publishing. While the issue touches on all forms
of self-publishing—print as well as digital/electronic—we could do an entire issue
devoted to the evolving models for online or digital self-publishing.<br /><br />
We also closed the issue before the partnership announcement between <a href="www.lexcycle.com">Stanza</a> and <a href="www.smashwords.com">Smashwords</a>.
You’re probably thinking, Why do I care about the partnership of two companies I’ve
never heard of? 
<br /><br />
True, it wasn’t until I had an iPhone that I became really aware of these two companies
and understood what was happening.<br /><br />
Here are the basics:<br /><ul><li>
The <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone </a>is a mobile device that’s used
by nearly 20 million people.</li><li><a href="http://www.lexcycle.com">Stanza</a> is a popular e-book reader you can use
on your iPhone (you download it for free directly from your phone).</li><li><a href="www.smashwords.com">Smashwords</a> is a self-publishing company that publishes
e-books only. You can use their service without any upfront cost, plus you can make
your book available for as little or as much as you want (even for free).</li><li>
Smashwords + Stanza means your self-published work can be available to millions of
people, or at least the 1 million people who have downloaded the Stanza application
onto their iPhones, as of January 2009.</li></ul>
Big-picture, what does this mean for writers? We’re starting to see the eradication
of distribution barriers to self-published works. If authors can effectively spread
the word about their work, then it can be quickly, easily, and inexpensively downloaded
on a very popular device.<br /><br />
I find it intoxicating. All of this is quite new, but also instantly transformative.
Smashwords debuted in early 2008; Stanza became available on the iPhone in July 2008.
(<a href="http://www.lexcycle.com/news">You can see the impact Stanza has had on the
reading and publishing community by reviewing the headlines on their news page.</a>)<br /><br />
So I took some time to talk on the phone with Smashwords founder, Mark Coker, as well
as Lexcycle’s COO, Neelan Choksi. Here’s some of what they had to say.<br /><br /><br /><font size="4"><u>Interview with Mark Coker at Smashwords</u></font><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/swlogo.png" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><b>I’m just now realizing the power of the iPhone and Stanza. I admit, I didn’t really
comprehend the e-book universe until recently.</b><br /><br />
Stanza has become a really powerful reading platform. If you talk to core e-book reading
enthusiasts, they'll tell you that the iPhone is nothing new, but I think what we're
starting to see is we're expanding beyond those early adopters to the mainstream.
Especially with Oprah talking about the Kindle, that opens people's eyes.<br /><br />
Reading on paper is a prejudice we're up against. But when people try it, they have
a wow moment, kind of this religious experience. My first experience with the Kindle
was on Waikiki beach … and I brought it on my vacation, and I booted it up, and I
went to the bookstore, and I downloaded samples of different books. It was easy and
within 10 minutes I had purchased my first book. You can bring the bookstore anywhere,
you can bring your library anywhere, and you can have your book your way.<br /><br />
E-books still only account for about 1% of all book sales, probably less. There's
a lot of upside—it's going to happen, it's going to continue to grow in a big way,
regardless of what happens with the traditional print industry.<br /><br />
What we're seeing with e-books is what we saw with blogging several years ago—the
same prejudices in the media, but we saw what happened in the blogosphere. There are
a lot of talented people in the world, and until some of these technologies came along,
they just did not have a voice or a chance to show their talent.<br /><br /><b>A lot of writers or authors ask me: Will they be able to earn the same kind of
living if e-books start to replace traditional print book sales?</b><br /><br />
Writing is going to become more profitable for more authors. Even if e-books continue
to become widely successful, print books aren't going to go away. The authors that
are currently successful in print will continue to be successful in print. If you
look at the current book industry supply chain, from author to reader, it’s author-agent-editor-publisher-packager-distributor-warehouser-bookstore.
There are a lot of costs associated with that supply chain. It's a big cost to ship
dead trees. There are a lot of costs that can be cut when you go digital. The costs
of producing a digital book, or the costs of producing one more copy, are zero. If
the book is going to be professionally edited and vetted by an editor, there are still
those costs. But when you eliminate all these other costs, like returns, you can dramatically
lower the cost of the book to the customer and at the same time dramatically increase
the profitability to the publisher or the author.<br /><br />
Another thing that gets me excited about Smashwords is the lower cost of books. Most
of the books are $3, many are free. Print books averaging $14.95 are unaffordable
to the vast majority of people on this earth. It's really cool to think that if we
can lower the cost of books, then we can lower the barrier to unleash a new era of
literacy and culture and information sharing.<br /><br />
We'll always have commercial books and we need them, and we need a way for authors
to profit from their works.<br /><br />
Longer term, like a year or two, my hope is that Smashwords will start attracting
some established authors who choose to go the independent route for their next book
or choose to keep the digital rights and publish it on their own.<br /><br /><b>For authors who choose to self-publish, are e-books a better option?</b><br /><br />
Print is a very important format. Authors should provide to the consumer whatever
the consumer wants to have. Authors should continue to publish in print and also publish
in a digital format. 
<br /><br />
The biggest threat facing all authors is obscurity. This is another exciting thing
about digital books, making them accessible in an entirely different way. I think
is print wonderful—but they're different things.<br /><br />
Books have always been sold via word of mouth. The Internet is an ideal word of mouth
tool. We've added simple things to make it easy for people to share their books on
social networks. If the book is truly great, it can find an audience.<br /><br />
In the next five years, I think it's fair to say we're going to see fewer bookstores
out there. As bookstores disappear, it reduces exposure opportunities for authors
who are lucky enough to be part of that system. And it also hurts publishers. It's
happening already today—we're going to see fewer bookstores, few publishers, and publishers
publishing few books, at least under the traditional system. So I think we're going
to see publishers making more interesting use of digital, more use of POD, and more
authors aspiring to be independent from the beginning.<br /><br />
Our focus as a digital publishing platform is to provide all authors the tools they
need to publish, promote, and sell their books and we hope that it’s an enabling force
to unleash a torrent of new talented content out there. I can't stress it enough,
though: Authors need to be realistic. This is not a get-rich quick thing. It's always
been difficult to sell a book, and as an indie author, it's even more difficult. Authors
who invest their time and energy into this will be rewarded for it.<br /><br /><br /><font size="4"><u>Interview with Neelan Choksi, COO of Lexcycle (creator of Stanza)</u></font><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/Picture%201.png" border="0" height="190" width="241" /><br /><br /><b><br />
I see a lot about reader response and awareness of e-books, but I wonder if writers
or authors also understand what’s happening, and are using the iPhone and Stanza?</b><br /><br />
The writers are pretty cognizant of what's going on, or at least they're learning
about it. There's enough mainstreaming of what's happened. As soon as you get Oprah
talking about the Kindle and by extension e-books, you've just mainstreamed the whole
thing. I do believe that writers are very aware of it, and it may be going from genre
to genre at different paces. For example, sci-fi and romance, as is often the case,
are leading the charge. We first read about Stanza and romance on someone's blog;
they had gotten an early edition from an author using Stanza on their iPhone. That’s
one example; there's a lot of examples, where individuals are starting to figure it
out.<br /><br />
We get pretty regular e-mails or calls or conversations with authors. With Random
House, there's a promotion happening and a bunch of others are doing the same promotion.
They went to about a half dozen of their authors and said: We can make your backlist
titles available on Stanza for free, plus an excerpt of your upcoming book for free,
and it will be a way of getting new readers learning about you as an author. Cory
Doctorow made that model unbelievably famous.<br /><br />
And example of another conversation I had with an author—with everything that's happening
in the big houses from a publishing perspective—there's all of this upheaval. Part
of what's happening is that the blockbuster authors will always get the attention
of the publishers, but there's a level that now just aren't. More than 300,000 copies
of this author’s book will sell, and his comment was that he didn't believe his next
book was going to get the attention from his publisher. He was thinking about creating
his own publishing house. I mentioned Smashwords to him, here's a really interesting
model. How many books would you have had to sell with your original publisher to make
the same money as you would with Smashwords?<br /><br />
Some big author is going to go this indie route, either as a threat, or as something
they truly believe in. Someone's going to do it simply because the numbers make sense.<br /><br />
None of this would have happened if digital publishing hadn't reached this inflection
point. The numbers still aren't that big ($44 million sold in the United States),
and aren't particularly compelling when compared to the traditional industry. But
I think a million isn't a number that anyone expected us to have at this point.<br /><br /><b>Can you give any insight into what genres or categories are selling the best through
Stanza onto the iPhone?</b><br /><br />
I fully expect the breakdown to look just like the rest of America’s book sales. Right
now, there's a lot of interest in politics and government and Obama.<br /><br />
Remember this company is about a year old. The desktop version of Stanza for Mac was
basically supposed to take content and covert and upload it to a Kindle, primarily
for people's personal documents. The iPhone Stanza app released in July 2008 with
just free books—a strategic decision because we felt there would be push back. … We
thought the best thing was to put no barriers in the way of adoption.<br /><br /><b>What’s been the biggest surprise for you?</b><br /><br />
We had no anticipation we would hit 1 million downloads in 5.5 months. The adoption
has probably been one of the biggest surprises of all.<br /><br />
The industry itself right now is in a situation that all ships rise with the tide.
Maybe really the surprise was how much marketing Amazon was going to do, how much
marketing Sony was going to do, and all of the new devices that are coming out. …
It just feels like there's so much momentum behind it.<br /><br />
Also, one of our most commented on features is the simple fact that when you reopen
Stanza on iPhone, it takes you right back to the last page you were on and the last
book you were in. You don't have a problem with reading five pages worth of material
while standing the grocery store line. You get immediately back to where you were,
and you know as soon as you shut it down or take a call, you know when you open up
Stanza, you'll go back to that same spot. It's a bookmark essentially.<br /><br />
We've done a survey on our site and the primary places that people read using stanza
are (1) bed (2) commuting (3) waiting areas.<br /><br />
That was a big surprise for a lot of people, iPhone use in bed.<br /><br />
—————<br /><br />
I'd love your comments about your experience either reading e-books or writing/selling/promoting
e-books. What's most exciting about it, and if you're a writer, what causes you the
most worry?<br /></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80" />
      </body>
      <title>Do Writers' Futures Lie in Indie E-Publishing Platforms?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2009/01/28/DoWritersFuturesLieInIndieEPublishingPlatforms.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/Picture%202.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The March/April issue of Writer’s Digest magazine hits newsstands in the week ahead;
its feature package focuses on self-publishing. While the issue touches on all forms
of self-publishing—print as well as digital/electronic—we could do an entire issue
devoted to the evolving models for online or digital self-publishing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We also closed the issue before the partnership announcement between &lt;a href="www.lexcycle.com"&gt;Stanza&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="www.smashwords.com"&gt;Smashwords&lt;/a&gt;.
You’re probably thinking, Why do I care about the partnership of two companies I’ve
never heard of? 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
True, it wasn’t until I had an iPhone that I became really aware of these two companies
and understood what was happening.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here are the basics:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/"&gt;iPhone &lt;/a&gt;is a mobile device that’s used
by nearly 20 million people.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.lexcycle.com"&gt;Stanza&lt;/a&gt; is a popular e-book reader you can use
on your iPhone (you download it for free directly from your phone).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="www.smashwords.com"&gt;Smashwords&lt;/a&gt; is a self-publishing company that publishes
e-books only. You can use their service without any upfront cost, plus you can make
your book available for as little or as much as you want (even for free).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Smashwords + Stanza means your self-published work can be available to millions of
people, or at least the 1 million people who have downloaded the Stanza application
onto their iPhones, as of January 2009.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Big-picture, what does this mean for writers? We’re starting to see the eradication
of distribution barriers to self-published works. If authors can effectively spread
the word about their work, then it can be quickly, easily, and inexpensively downloaded
on a very popular device.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I find it intoxicating. All of this is quite new, but also instantly transformative.
Smashwords debuted in early 2008; Stanza became available on the iPhone in July 2008.
(&lt;a href="http://www.lexcycle.com/news"&gt;You can see the impact Stanza has had on the
reading and publishing community by reviewing the headlines on their news page.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So I took some time to talk on the phone with Smashwords founder, Mark Coker, as well
as Lexcycle’s COO, Neelan Choksi. Here’s some of what they had to say.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;u&gt;Interview with Mark Coker at Smashwords&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/swlogo.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;I’m just now realizing the power of the iPhone and Stanza. I admit, I didn’t really
comprehend the e-book universe until recently.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Stanza has become a really powerful reading platform. If you talk to core e-book reading
enthusiasts, they'll tell you that the iPhone is nothing new, but I think what we're
starting to see is we're expanding beyond those early adopters to the mainstream.
Especially with Oprah talking about the Kindle, that opens people's eyes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Reading on paper is a prejudice we're up against. But when people try it, they have
a wow moment, kind of this religious experience. My first experience with the Kindle
was on Waikiki beach … and I brought it on my vacation, and I booted it up, and I
went to the bookstore, and I downloaded samples of different books. It was easy and
within 10 minutes I had purchased my first book. You can bring the bookstore anywhere,
you can bring your library anywhere, and you can have your book your way.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
E-books still only account for about 1% of all book sales, probably less. There's
a lot of upside—it's going to happen, it's going to continue to grow in a big way,
regardless of what happens with the traditional print industry.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What we're seeing with e-books is what we saw with blogging several years ago—the
same prejudices in the media, but we saw what happened in the blogosphere. There are
a lot of talented people in the world, and until some of these technologies came along,
they just did not have a voice or a chance to show their talent.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;A lot of writers or authors ask me: Will they be able to earn the same kind of
living if e-books start to replace traditional print book sales?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Writing is going to become more profitable for more authors. Even if e-books continue
to become widely successful, print books aren't going to go away. The authors that
are currently successful in print will continue to be successful in print. If you
look at the current book industry supply chain, from author to reader, it’s author-agent-editor-publisher-packager-distributor-warehouser-bookstore.
There are a lot of costs associated with that supply chain. It's a big cost to ship
dead trees. There are a lot of costs that can be cut when you go digital. The costs
of producing a digital book, or the costs of producing one more copy, are zero. If
the book is going to be professionally edited and vetted by an editor, there are still
those costs. But when you eliminate all these other costs, like returns, you can dramatically
lower the cost of the book to the customer and at the same time dramatically increase
the profitability to the publisher or the author.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Another thing that gets me excited about Smashwords is the lower cost of books. Most
of the books are $3, many are free. Print books averaging $14.95 are unaffordable
to the vast majority of people on this earth. It's really cool to think that if we
can lower the cost of books, then we can lower the barrier to unleash a new era of
literacy and culture and information sharing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We'll always have commercial books and we need them, and we need a way for authors
to profit from their works.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Longer term, like a year or two, my hope is that Smashwords will start attracting
some established authors who choose to go the independent route for their next book
or choose to keep the digital rights and publish it on their own.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;For authors who choose to self-publish, are e-books a better option?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Print is a very important format. Authors should provide to the consumer whatever
the consumer wants to have. Authors should continue to publish in print and also publish
in a digital format. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The biggest threat facing all authors is obscurity. This is another exciting thing
about digital books, making them accessible in an entirely different way. I think
is print wonderful—but they're different things.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Books have always been sold via word of mouth. The Internet is an ideal word of mouth
tool. We've added simple things to make it easy for people to share their books on
social networks. If the book is truly great, it can find an audience.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the next five years, I think it's fair to say we're going to see fewer bookstores
out there. As bookstores disappear, it reduces exposure opportunities for authors
who are lucky enough to be part of that system. And it also hurts publishers. It's
happening already today—we're going to see fewer bookstores, few publishers, and publishers
publishing few books, at least under the traditional system. So I think we're going
to see publishers making more interesting use of digital, more use of POD, and more
authors aspiring to be independent from the beginning.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Our focus as a digital publishing platform is to provide all authors the tools they
need to publish, promote, and sell their books and we hope that it’s an enabling force
to unleash a torrent of new talented content out there. I can't stress it enough,
though: Authors need to be realistic. This is not a get-rich quick thing. It's always
been difficult to sell a book, and as an indie author, it's even more difficult. Authors
who invest their time and energy into this will be rewarded for it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;u&gt;Interview with Neelan Choksi, COO of Lexcycle (creator of Stanza)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/Picture%201.png" border="0" height="190" width="241"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I see a lot about reader response and awareness of e-books, but I wonder if writers
or authors also understand what’s happening, and are using the iPhone and Stanza?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The writers are pretty cognizant of what's going on, or at least they're learning
about it. There's enough mainstreaming of what's happened. As soon as you get Oprah
talking about the Kindle and by extension e-books, you've just mainstreamed the whole
thing. I do believe that writers are very aware of it, and it may be going from genre
to genre at different paces. For example, sci-fi and romance, as is often the case,
are leading the charge. We first read about Stanza and romance on someone's blog;
they had gotten an early edition from an author using Stanza on their iPhone. That’s
one example; there's a lot of examples, where individuals are starting to figure it
out.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We get pretty regular e-mails or calls or conversations with authors. With Random
House, there's a promotion happening and a bunch of others are doing the same promotion.
They went to about a half dozen of their authors and said: We can make your backlist
titles available on Stanza for free, plus an excerpt of your upcoming book for free,
and it will be a way of getting new readers learning about you as an author. Cory
Doctorow made that model unbelievably famous.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And example of another conversation I had with an author—with everything that's happening
in the big houses from a publishing perspective—there's all of this upheaval. Part
of what's happening is that the blockbuster authors will always get the attention
of the publishers, but there's a level that now just aren't. More than 300,000 copies
of this author’s book will sell, and his comment was that he didn't believe his next
book was going to get the attention from his publisher. He was thinking about creating
his own publishing house. I mentioned Smashwords to him, here's a really interesting
model. How many books would you have had to sell with your original publisher to make
the same money as you would with Smashwords?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Some big author is going to go this indie route, either as a threat, or as something
they truly believe in. Someone's going to do it simply because the numbers make sense.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
None of this would have happened if digital publishing hadn't reached this inflection
point. The numbers still aren't that big ($44 million sold in the United States),
and aren't particularly compelling when compared to the traditional industry. But
I think a million isn't a number that anyone expected us to have at this point.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Can you give any insight into what genres or categories are selling the best through
Stanza onto the iPhone?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I fully expect the breakdown to look just like the rest of America’s book sales. Right
now, there's a lot of interest in politics and government and Obama.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Remember this company is about a year old. The desktop version of Stanza for Mac was
basically supposed to take content and covert and upload it to a Kindle, primarily
for people's personal documents. The iPhone Stanza app released in July 2008 with
just free books—a strategic decision because we felt there would be push back. … We
thought the best thing was to put no barriers in the way of adoption.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;What’s been the biggest surprise for you?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We had no anticipation we would hit 1 million downloads in 5.5 months. The adoption
has probably been one of the biggest surprises of all.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The industry itself right now is in a situation that all ships rise with the tide.
Maybe really the surprise was how much marketing Amazon was going to do, how much
marketing Sony was going to do, and all of the new devices that are coming out. …
It just feels like there's so much momentum behind it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, one of our most commented on features is the simple fact that when you reopen
Stanza on iPhone, it takes you right back to the last page you were on and the last
book you were in. You don't have a problem with reading five pages worth of material
while standing the grocery store line. You get immediately back to where you were,
and you know as soon as you shut it down or take a call, you know when you open up
Stanza, you'll go back to that same spot. It's a bookmark essentially.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We've done a survey on our site and the primary places that people read using stanza
are (1) bed (2) commuting (3) waiting areas.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That was a big surprise for a lot of people, iPhone use in bed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
—————&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'd love your comments about your experience either reading e-books or writing/selling/promoting
e-books. What's most exciting about it, and if you're a writer, what causes you the
most worry?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,0fbe9817-a6f5-4dee-b535-f76d44814e80.aspx</comments>
      <category>Digitization &amp; New Technology</category>
      <category>Getting Published</category>
      <category>Industry News &amp; Trends</category>
      <category>Self-Publishing</category>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <p>
          </p>
          <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/image001.png" border="0" />
          <br />
          <br />
The March/April 2009 issue of Writer's Digest magazine (which will soon be available
to subscribers and on-sale at newsstands) focuses on self-publishing, and includes
mention of some innovative publishing models that are starting to heat up. One of
them is <a href="http://www.webook.com/">WeBook</a>, which is a little difficult to
explain (they call it "the home of community-sourced books), but here's a perfect
example of the power of this model:<br /><br />
WeBook, in honor of the presidential inauguration, is publishing a collection of Obama
inauguration stories, "told by real people in their own words." You can submit your
story anytime between January 20, 2009 – Midnight EST January 21, 2009, at <a href="http://www.webook.com/">WeBook.com</a>,
and WeBook wil publish the book within two weeks using digital printing by CreateSpace
(an Amazon company), and sell it for $9.99. All profits from the project are donated
to <a href="www.826National.org">826 National</a>, and WeBook is asking contributors
to the collection to donate their royalties as well.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.webook.com/project.aspx?url=Jan-20-2009-True-Stories-Real-People-One-Day&amp;utm_source=webook&amp;utm_medium=banner&amp;utm_content=logged_out_hp">Clikc
here for the full detail.</a><br /><br />
You have to sign-up with WeBook to submit your story for consideration, and if your
story is selected, you'll have to sign a publishing agreement stipulating how you
will be paid and what rights are being purchased. (I was not able to find a copy of
such an agreement, but be sure to read any publishing contract carefully before signing.)<br /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77" />
      </body>
      <title>Will You Be at the Presidential Inauguration? Write &amp; Publish About It</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2009/01/12/WillYouBeAtThePresidentialInaugurationWritePublishAboutIt.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/image001.png" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The March/April 2009 issue of Writer's Digest magazine (which will soon be available
to subscribers and on-sale at newsstands) focuses on self-publishing, and includes
mention of some innovative publishing models that are starting to heat up. One of
them is &lt;a href="http://www.webook.com/"&gt;WeBook&lt;/a&gt;, which is a little difficult to
explain (they call it "the home of community-sourced books), but here's a perfect
example of the power of this model:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WeBook, in honor of the presidential inauguration, is publishing a collection of Obama
inauguration stories, "told by real people in their own words." You can submit your
story anytime between January 20, 2009 – Midnight EST January 21, 2009, at &lt;a href="http://www.webook.com/"&gt;WeBook.com&lt;/a&gt;,
and WeBook wil publish the book within two weeks using digital printing by CreateSpace
(an Amazon company), and sell it for $9.99. All profits from the project are donated
to &lt;a href="www.826National.org"&gt;826 National&lt;/a&gt;, and WeBook is asking contributors
to the collection to donate their royalties as well.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.webook.com/project.aspx?url=Jan-20-2009-True-Stories-Real-People-One-Day&amp;amp;utm_source=webook&amp;amp;utm_medium=banner&amp;amp;utm_content=logged_out_hp"&gt;Clikc
here for the full detail.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You have to sign-up with WeBook to submit your story for consideration, and if your
story is selected, you'll have to sign a publishing agreement stipulating how you
will be paid and what rights are being purchased. (I was not able to find a copy of
such an agreement, but be sure to read any publishing contract carefully before signing.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,8fa2ebb8-febb-4e1b-a2bc-300422cfec77.aspx</comments>
      <category>Digitization &amp; New Technology</category>
      <category>Getting Published</category>
      <category>Industry News &amp; Trends</category>
      <category>Self-Publishing</category>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/Jessica-Strawser-2.jpg" alt="Jessica-Strawser-2.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="300" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="200" />When
I first joined the Writer's Digest community in 2001, I had the great pleasure of
having Jessica Strawser as a colleague on <i>Writer's Digest</i> magazine. Our paths
diverged after a couple years, but now we're working together once again on this publication
that brings out our most heartfelt enthusiasm and creativity.<br /><br />
During her first turn at Writer's Digest, Jessica contributed and edited monthly magazine
columns about writing successes, critiques, and careers, and also served as executive
editor of multiple special issues (such as the ever-popular <i>Writer's Yearbook</i>).
Since her leave from the magazine, she's had experience in marketing and public relations,
online writing and editing, and book publishing, most recently as managing editor
for North Light Books.<br /><br />
Fans of <i>Writer's Digest</i> magazine, as well as future fans, have much to look
forward to. Jessica has a passion and expertise for the writing community that's accompanied
by a fresh perspective and a curiosity essential for our continuing mission to be
the most informative and trusted source for writers.<br /><br />
Please join me in welcoming Jessica: a fellow writer and a fellow editor (and, it
must be said, fellow book lover).<p></p><br /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f" />
      </body>
      <title>Announcing the New Editor of Writer's Digest Magazine</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2008/11/04/AnnouncingTheNewEditorOfWritersDigestMagazine.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/Jessica-Strawser-2.jpg" alt="Jessica-Strawser-2.jpg" align="left" border="0" height="300" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="200"&gt;When
I first joined the Writer's Digest community in 2001, I had the great pleasure of
having Jessica Strawser as a colleague on &lt;i&gt;Writer's Digest&lt;/i&gt; magazine. Our paths
diverged after a couple years, but now we're working together once again on this publication
that brings out our most heartfelt enthusiasm and creativity.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
During her first turn at Writer's Digest, Jessica contributed and edited monthly magazine
columns about writing successes, critiques, and careers, and also served as executive
editor of multiple special issues (such as the ever-popular &lt;i&gt;Writer's Yearbook&lt;/i&gt;).
Since her leave from the magazine, she's had experience in marketing and public relations,
online writing and editing, and book publishing, most recently as managing editor
for North Light Books.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Fans of &lt;i&gt;Writer's Digest&lt;/i&gt; magazine, as well as future fans, have much to look
forward to. Jessica has a passion and expertise for the writing community that's accompanied
by a fresh perspective and a curiosity essential for our continuing mission to be
the most informative and trusted source for writers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Please join me in welcoming Jessica: a fellow writer and a fellow editor (and, it
must be said, fellow book lover).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,d7801e2b-398b-4b4b-bafe-f2c34038415f.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>Everyone has offered such wonderful comments on <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Which+Writers+Digest+Magazine+Would+You+Buy.aspx">the
magazine covers</a> that I wanted to share/review some of them:<br /><br />
Mary Ulrich comments:<br /><blockquote><font color="#0000ff">I would think you have two audiences, the subscribers
and the people who will buy WD off the shelves.  The first sample has more of
the "Entertainment tonight" appeal and might hook the McGafferty fans to an impulse
purchase. As a subscriber I like number 2 or 3 because I am most interested in the
"craft" articles and like a creative drawing. …<br /><br />
In the Dec. issue of WD, in the small print on the bottom of page 2, it says that
WD is "a bimonthly publication".  Last issue I was confused to receive the December
issue at the beginning of October. So WD is published bimonthly, 6 X a year, or quarterly?</font><br /><br /></blockquote>First, to answer Mary's question: WD magazine is published 6x/year. I'm
not sure why, up until this point, we haven't clarified this by labeling the cover
with "November/December", "January/February" and so on. Something for me to research!<br /><br />
But to get to the real point: Mary hits on a perplexing issue that Writer's Digest
magazine faces: the difference between what would be appealing to many of our subscribers
(usually more advanced writers) and people who buy the magazine off newsstand—the
type of person we usually label as the "aspiring writer" or the "dreamer," though
all great writers are dreamers (even still aspiring) to some extent.<br /><br />
WD's circulation department has sales information that supports using an author photo
on the cover because photos perform better than illustrations on the newsstand. Of
course, what subscribers would prefer is a gray area, but based on the small sampling
of comments here, it does appear that people who have read the magazine for a while
tend to favor the illustrated cover.<br /><br />
However, it's hard to overlook the truth behind these comments:<br /><blockquote><font color="#0000ff">A writer on the cover makes me connect as opposed
to some abstract art. (PatriciaW)<br /><br />
The picture on the front cover of real people who struggled to write and enjoyed every
bit of their struggle, touches my heart most and gives me the motivation I need as
an aspiring writer. Their success to be featured on the cover speaks more words than
any art could reflect. Art and cartoon could work for specific topics inside the magazine,
but real people appeal more to the majority of would be writers. (Amina)<br /><br />
The first one absolutely caught me. I didn't know who Megan McCafferty was, but it
didn't matter to me, as the "Write Your Novel in 2009" was much the clearest on that
page, and that was what grabbed me. (Deb)</font><br /></blockquote>I generally tend to believe that writers who buy off newsstand are initially
pulled in by the photo (they connect with the human face -- this is probably subconscious
-- even if they don't recognize the face), but don't buy the issue unless the cover
lines really deliver on a benefit or dream the writer has -- in this case, to write
a novel.<br /><br />
As for subscribers, I can only hope they continue to renew because of great content,
and generally overlook covers meant to appeal to newsstand buyers?<br /><br />
It's a big challenge for us to tackle in 2009 and beyond.<br /><p></p></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33" />
      </body>
      <title>Writer's Digest Subscribers vs. Newsstand Buyers</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2008/10/23/WritersDigestSubscribersVsNewsstandBuyers.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;Everyone has offered such wonderful comments on &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Which+Writers+Digest+Magazine+Would+You+Buy.aspx"&gt;the
magazine covers&lt;/a&gt; that I wanted to share/review some of them:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mary Ulrich comments:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;I would think you have two audiences, the subscribers
and the people who will buy WD off the shelves.&amp;nbsp; The first sample has more of
the "Entertainment tonight" appeal and might hook the McGafferty fans to an impulse
purchase. As a subscriber I like number 2 or 3 because I am most interested in the
"craft" articles and like a creative drawing. …&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the Dec. issue of WD, in the small print on the bottom of page 2, it says that
WD is "a bimonthly publication".&amp;nbsp; Last issue I was confused to receive the December
issue at the beginning of October. So WD is published bimonthly, 6 X a year, or quarterly?&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;First, to answer Mary's question: WD magazine is published 6x/year. I'm
not sure why, up until this point, we haven't clarified this by labeling the cover
with "November/December", "January/February" and so on. Something for me to research!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But to get to the real point: Mary hits on a perplexing issue that Writer's Digest
magazine faces: the difference between what would be appealing to many of our subscribers
(usually more advanced writers) and people who buy the magazine off newsstand—the
type of person we usually label as the "aspiring writer" or the "dreamer," though
all great writers are dreamers (even still aspiring) to some extent.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WD's circulation department has sales information that supports using an author photo
on the cover because photos perform better than illustrations on the newsstand. Of
course, what subscribers would prefer is a gray area, but based on the small sampling
of comments here, it does appear that people who have read the magazine for a while
tend to favor the illustrated cover.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However, it's hard to overlook the truth behind these comments:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;A writer on the cover makes me connect as opposed
to some abstract art. (PatriciaW)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The picture on the front cover of real people who struggled to write and enjoyed every
bit of their struggle, touches my heart most and gives me the motivation I need as
an aspiring writer. Their success to be featured on the cover speaks more words than
any art could reflect. Art and cartoon could work for specific topics inside the magazine,
but real people appeal more to the majority of would be writers. (Amina)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The first one absolutely caught me. I didn't know who Megan McCafferty was, but it
didn't matter to me, as the "Write Your Novel in 2009" was much the clearest on that
page, and that was what grabbed me. (Deb)&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;I generally tend to believe that writers who buy off newsstand are initially
pulled in by the photo (they connect with the human face -- this is probably subconscious
-- even if they don't recognize the face), but don't buy the issue unless the cover
lines really deliver on a benefit or dream the writer has -- in this case, to write
a novel.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As for subscribers, I can only hope they continue to renew because of great content,
and generally overlook covers meant to appeal to newsstand buyers?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's a big challenge for us to tackle in 2009 and beyond.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,bb142b40-acfc-4bc4-ad83-5fa2b8678e33.aspx</comments>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>We're putting the finishing touches on the January/February 2009 issue of Writer's
Digest, and have four very different options for the cover. 
<br /><br />
Which one do you like best?<br />
And which featured story looks most exciting to you?<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-1.jpg" alt="WD-1.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558" /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-2.jpg" alt="WD-2.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558" /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-3.jpg" alt="WD-3.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558" /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-4.jpg" alt="WD-4.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558" /><br /><p></p></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de" />
      </body>
      <title>Which Writer's Digest Magazine Would You Buy?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2008/10/21/WhichWritersDigestMagazineWouldYouBuy.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;We're putting the finishing touches on the January/February 2009 issue of Writer's
Digest, and have four very different options for the cover. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Which one do you like best?&lt;br&gt;
And which featured story looks most exciting to you?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-1.jpg" alt="WD-1.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-2.jpg" alt="WD-2.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-3.jpg" alt="WD-3.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-4.jpg" alt="WD-4.jpg" border="1" height="774" width="558"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,f7991882-660f-4fcf-ac91-4cf9d20682de.aspx</comments>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-mag.jpg" alt="WD-mag.jpg" border="0" height="63" width="400" />
          <br />
          <br />
Everyone has been so helpful in giving feedback on magazine content, so here's a sneak
peek at our issue themes for the coming year. This is a very broad-stroke outline,
but gives you a sense of our focus each issue. 
<br /><br />
If there's a particular technique, topic, or area that you've always hoped we'd cover, <a href="mailto:jane.friedman@fwpubs.com">let
me know!</a><br /><br /><br /><b>April 2009</b><br />
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SELF PUBLISHING<br /><ul><li>
The new perception of self-publishing; emerging tools and models</li><li>
Resource chart on POD companies (what they offer, fees, rights, etc.) and reader feedback
on self-publishing experiences. 
</li></ul>
WORKBOOK: Revision and Self-Editing<br /><ul><li>
How to turn a first draft into a salable manuscript</li><li>
When and how to work with freelancers to get a book into shape</li></ul><br /><b>June 2009</b><br />
GET KNOWN BEFORE THE BOOK DEAL (MARKETING &amp; PROMOTION ISSUE)<br /><ul><li>
How to market and promote yourself before and after you make the sale</li><li>
The most effective way to use social networking tools to sell yourself &amp; your
book</li><li>
Hands-on guide to online viral marketing tools (blog tours, book trailers, reading
groups, podcasts) 
</li></ul>
WORKBOOK: Writing Memoirs and Life Stories (when you’re not a name)<br /><br /><br /><b>August 2009 </b><br />
PUBLISHING 101: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU WRITE A WORD<br /><ul><li>
Visual guide to how your book moves from proposal to print to on the shelf—all the
steps, all the things you need to know ahead of time</li><li>
What to expect from your publisher (editorial, marketing, publicity)</li><li>
How the industry has changed and new steps you need to take to ensure successful publication</li></ul>
WORKBOOK: The Art &amp; Craft of Storytelling; Hooking Your Reader From Page One<br /><br /><br /><b>October 2009</b><br />
AGENTS AND EDITORS SPEAK OUT (THE GATEKEEPER ISSUE)<br /><ul><li>
The new roles of gatekeepers and how to be an equal partner in publication</li><li>
The anatomy of a book deal and a book contract: what you must know and ask about even
if you do have an agent</li></ul>
WORKBOOK: Novel-writing related<br /><br /><br /><b>December 2009</b><br />
THE FUTURE OF PUBLISHING<br /><ul><li>
The changing economic model of media and the emerging role of writers as content providers—five
essential rules to follow to stay in the game</li><li>
How to negotiate the smartest deal for digital rights and e-rights (and when to keep
all such rights for yourself)</li></ul>
WORKBOOK: Writing Groups &amp; Critique Group Guide; A Fresh Start in the New Year<br /><p></p></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88" />
      </body>
      <title>Writer's Digest Magazine: 2009 Editorial Calendar</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2008/10/02/WritersDigestMagazine2009EditorialCalendar.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/content/binary/WD-mag.jpg" alt="WD-mag.jpg" border="0" height="63" width="400"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Everyone has been so helpful in giving feedback on magazine content, so here's a sneak
peek at our issue themes for the coming year. This is a very broad-stroke outline,
but gives you a sense of our focus each issue. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If there's a particular technique, topic, or area that you've always hoped we'd cover, &lt;a href="mailto:jane.friedman@fwpubs.com"&gt;let
me know!&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;April 2009&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SELF PUBLISHING&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The new perception of self-publishing; emerging tools and models&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Resource chart on POD companies (what they offer, fees, rights, etc.) and reader feedback
on self-publishing experiences. 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
WORKBOOK: Revision and Self-Editing&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
How to turn a first draft into a salable manuscript&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
When and how to work with freelancers to get a book into shape&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;June 2009&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
GET KNOWN BEFORE THE BOOK DEAL (MARKETING &amp;amp; PROMOTION ISSUE)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
How to market and promote yourself before and after you make the sale&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The most effective way to use social networking tools to sell yourself &amp;amp; your
book&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Hands-on guide to online viral marketing tools (blog tours, book trailers, reading
groups, podcasts) 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
WORKBOOK: Writing Memoirs and Life Stories (when you’re not a name)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;August 2009 &lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
PUBLISHING 101: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU WRITE A WORD&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Visual guide to how your book moves from proposal to print to on the shelf—all the
steps, all the things you need to know ahead of time&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What to expect from your publisher (editorial, marketing, publicity)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
How the industry has changed and new steps you need to take to ensure successful publication&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
WORKBOOK: The Art &amp;amp; Craft of Storytelling; Hooking Your Reader From Page One&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;October 2009&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
AGENTS AND EDITORS SPEAK OUT (THE GATEKEEPER ISSUE)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The new roles of gatekeepers and how to be an equal partner in publication&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The anatomy of a book deal and a book contract: what you must know and ask about even
if you do have an agent&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
WORKBOOK: Novel-writing related&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;December 2009&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
THE FUTURE OF PUBLISHING&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The changing economic model of media and the emerging role of writers as content providers—five
essential rules to follow to stay in the game&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
How to negotiate the smartest deal for digital rights and e-rights (and when to keep
all such rights for yourself)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
WORKBOOK: Writing Groups &amp;amp; Critique Group Guide; A Fresh Start in the New Year&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,40dd5060-2ecf-4c0f-86ee-f45b66ed7a88.aspx</comments>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/Trackback.aspx?guid=cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>I thought you might be interested in reading some of the personal responses I
received when I asked what you'd like to see in the magazine in 2009.<br /><blockquote><br /><ul><li>
I'd like to see more focus on writing and editing fiction (less on other types of
writing), and I'd love to see regular articles on innovative book promotion—not just
the basics or the same things we've all read, but how to really promote your book—most
especially novels, because they're not as obvious about how to promote them as non-fiction
is. 
</li></ul><ul><li>
As someone who is writing a non-fiction social history/reference guide, I would like
to see more information about breaking into non-fiction for and by writers of non-fiction
when one isn't a celebrity or "name."</li></ul><ul><li>
What about including more stories from authors about their initial path to publication.
Aspiring writers want to know how other writers got started. I think WD does a pretty
good job of profiling bestselling authors, but I think aspiring writers want to hear
more about numbers of rejections—in other words the struggle involved and how it ultimately
paid off. 
<br /></li></ul><ul><li>
More news/features on alternative and self-publishing. Thanks to the Internet, the
publishing industry is transforming right before our eyes. Today's writers have so
many other options other than the traditional publishing routes, and I'd love to read
more about these options. Everyone is always worrying about query writing and how
to get an agent, when the Internet gives true self-publishers the marketing and distribution
tools once reserved only for the big publishers.</li></ul><ul><li>
I definitely vote for more on self-publishing. I don't see it as a "game" as much
as an effective strategy to getting a formal book deal, if one desires it. That's
what worked for me. I also see self-publishing as a strategy to experiment with new
ideas to gauge the market response. Again, very effective and efficient for me to<br />
test out new ideas with my audience on a smaller scale and monitor impact,<br />
modify, what have you, before courting taking the idea that next step.</li></ul><ul><li>
I hope the new technological tools you're planning to discuss will<br />
include podcasting.<br /></li></ul></blockquote>Thanks to everyone who took time to comment both here on the blog and
those of you who e-mailed me personally. Your input is invaluable in helping shape
our direction!<br /><p></p></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2" />
      </body>
      <title>Your Feedback on Topics for Writer's Digest magazine</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/PermaLink,guid,cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2008/10/01/YourFeedbackOnTopicsForWritersDigestMagazine.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;I thought you might be interested in reading some of the personal responses I
received when I asked what you'd like to see in the magazine in 2009.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
I'd like to see more focus on writing and editing fiction (less on other types of
writing), and I'd love to see regular articles on innovative book promotion—not just
the basics or the same things we've all read, but how to really promote your book—most
especially novels, because they're not as obvious about how to promote them as non-fiction
is. 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
As someone who is writing a non-fiction social history/reference guide, I would like
to see more information about breaking into non-fiction for and by writers of non-fiction
when one isn't a celebrity or "name."&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What about including more stories from authors about their initial path to publication.
Aspiring writers want to know how other writers got started. I think WD does a pretty
good job of profiling bestselling authors, but I think aspiring writers want to hear
more about numbers of rejections—in other words the struggle involved and how it ultimately
paid off. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
More news/features on alternative and self-publishing. Thanks to the Internet, the
publishing industry is transforming right before our eyes. Today's writers have so
many other options other than the traditional publishing routes, and I'd love to read
more about these options. Everyone is always worrying about query writing and how
to get an agent, when the Internet gives true self-publishers the marketing and distribution
tools once reserved only for the big publishers.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
I definitely vote for more on self-publishing. I don't see it as a "game" as much
as an effective strategy to getting a formal book deal, if one desires it. That's
what worked for me. I also see self-publishing as a strategy to experiment with new
ideas to gauge the market response. Again, very effective and efficient for me to&lt;br&gt;
test out new ideas with my audience on a smaller scale and monitor impact,&lt;br&gt;
modify, what have you, before courting taking the idea that next step.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
I hope the new technological tools you're planning to discuss will&lt;br&gt;
include podcasting.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Thanks to everyone who took time to comment both here on the blog and
those of you who e-mailed me personally. Your input is invaluable in helping shape
our direction!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/aggbug.ashx?id=cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/CommentView,guid,cdcae17e-52ff-41ba-94c5-ca387594eba2.aspx</comments>
      <category>WD Magazine</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>