|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (8) |
| October, 2009 (18) |
| September, 2009 (22) |
| August, 2009 (15) |
| July, 2009 (22) |
| June, 2009 (19) |
| May, 2009 (18) |
| April, 2009 (25) |
| March, 2009 (19) |
| February, 2009 (21) |
| January, 2009 (18) |
| December, 2008 (3) |
| November, 2008 (12) |
| October, 2008 (13) |
| September, 2008 (24) |
| August, 2008 (27) |
| July, 2008 (26) |
| June, 2008 (34) |
| May, 2008 (36) |
| April, 2008 (2) |
|
Search
Archives
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Saturday, May 17, 2008
Day 2: Pennwriters (Tips, Insights)
Posted by Jane
A recap of Saturday's events. Successful Nonfiction Pitches (Irene Goodman)In the morning I attended a session by agent Irene Goodman (25 years in the business), who spoke on developing a strong nonfiction book pitch. She posed the following question to the audience: How much will the publisher support your book, or what will they do to promote it? A few people in the audience responded (somewhat dismally): Zero. Nothing. They do nothing. (An aside: Even though many writers know the correct answer to Irene's question, I meet very few writers who actually incorporate their platform into their pitches—almost as if all writers believe they are the exception to the rule. Irene told me later that writers have a hard time personalizing this advice about platform. They hear it, but don't apply it.) In any case, much of Irene's talk focused on developing a platform attractive to an editor or agent. She touched on various elements author platform, such as: - having a current Web site, with interactive elements (podcasts, videocasts, blogs)
- building a mailing list (which is only meaningful if at 2,000+ names)
- sending out regular e-newsletters
- participating in online communities
- being a joiner (putting yourself out there)
- publishing articles for magazines, newspapers, etc.
- speaking at organizations and events
- getting attention from local and national media
An interesting point I haven't heard before: Irene said "real deal" authors (people who are experts in their area or passionate about their book topic) may not have a platform because they're busy doing their "real" jobs (being a teacher, being a doctor, etc). But even those people need to find ways to reach out and market themselves and build a platform. (She gave an example of a committed teacher who already speaks frequently to local PTA groups as part of his job. To build platform, his next step would be to find a national PTA group where he could speak.) Other highlights from Irene's talk: - She highly recommended an e-book by MJ Rose and Douglas Clegg, Buzz Your Book.
- Never put in your book proposal something like "This would be great on talk shows (radio, TV, etc)." Of course your topic would be great on talk shows. But so what? Who cares? What are you (the author) doing to make it happen? As an example of a proactive writer/author, Irene described a flower arranger who might send flowers to producers, with a note saying, "I can show your audience how to do this." Even if your attempts aren't successful, at the very least it should help you build contacts, or a network.
- And: You probably have more contacts than you think. Don't be afraid to ask for things—but be genuine, be real.
Today's PitchesThe best pitches I heard today were from writers who focused on their market (audience) and how the audience would benefit from the book. The less successful pitches focused on the actual content of the book. I think the right ratio for a nonfiction book pitch is: - 30 seconds on who the market or audience is and what problem they need to solve
- 15 seconds on the book concept/hook that addresses that problem
- 30 seconds on who you are (the author) and your platform (how you reach readers today)
Lunch Speaker: D.L. WilsonNovelist D.L. Wilson talked about "practice novels": write that first manuscript, just to practice your craft and get it out of the way, then lock it in the closet. It's not a waste of your time; it's an excellent use of your time, because you're practicing and getting better. He also said that editors have such enormous workloads these days that authors should not expect meaningful involvement ... unlike the early days of Robert Ludlum, whose editorial process with his legendary editor spanned 1-2 years for his first novel ( The Scarlatti Inheritance), which then became a bestseller partially due to that revision process. Do editors today have time for such an involved process? Most do not. Publishing Trends (Irene Goodman)In the afternoon, Irene gave a whirlwind tour of what's hot and what's not in today's book publishing industry. Keep in mind the date of this list (May 17, 2008); it will go out-of-date fast. FICTION - Novels with "craft" themes (knitting, quilting, etc)
- Female protagonists in thrillers, "damsel in control", kick-ass heroines, Buffy-derivatives
- In romance, old-school is now in style
- Historical fiction, particularly Tudors and Elizabethans, sexy royal soap operas
- Urban fantasies, THE hottest thing is young adult urban fantasy with female protagonists
- Erotica is in (both good and bad erotica)
- OUT: cozy mysteries without any hook, paranormal romance, biblically based quest for a legendary object, macho guys, chick lit, American historical fiction, male private-eyes, English village mystery
NONFICTION (Note: Irene stressed this genre is less trend driven. It is platform driven, since all you need to do is prove there is an audience that you can sell to.) - Participatory journalism
- Memoirs, only if extremely well-written, if you have something very special or unusual to say. Pet memoirs.
- Fun, upbeat animal books, even narrated by the animal, not too cutesy, it has to be "real"
- Crafts
- OUT: Elizabeth-Gilbert also-rans, green books, cutesy memoirs, parenting
Agents | Conferences/Events | General | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends
Saturday, May 17, 2008 3:41:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Friday, May 16, 2008
Day 1: Pennwriters (Tips, Insights)
Posted by Jane
A recap of my first day at Pennwriters. Tip: Pitching Your NovelThe first bit advice comes from Jonathan Maberry, which was actually shared with me by Bill Peschel, who picked me up from the airport. (Thanks, Bill!) Maberry said: Don't get bogged down in the plot details when you're pitching your novel. Sell the story, don't tell it. I couldn't have said it better myself. Additional tip: I always recommend that writers ready to pitch look in Donald Maass's Writing the Breakout Novel Workbook, and flip to the last page for a great worksheet on constructing your novel pitch. It will help you avoid a too-detailed pitch. Deep Thoughts from Joyce Carol OatesThis was the first time I'd heard Oates speak. About halfway through her keynote, I thought, "Man, she's really focusing on the dark emotions behind writing. Why?" By the end, I remembered: It's Joyce Carol Oates. Her talk was titled "Woundedness, Rejection, and Inspiration," and she seemed to pull many anecdotes from her recent book about the ending days of famous writers. She said she's fascinated by how rejection affects writers, wounds writers. She discussed the equation of emotional vulnerability + imagination + non-complacency + asking questions + questing. She also spoke of writers who are wounded during childhood and become isolated, which then leads to "compulsive speech." She gave Anais Nin as an example. She raised issues for me that strike at the core of what or who we think writers are as people (or what perhaps drives great writing or writers), such as: - Are writers more vulnerable than others? Does vulnerable mean weaker? And is this because they are more sensitive or empathetic to people/environment? (Or are these two separate issues entirely?)
- Does the best work spring from dark emotions, dark experiences, or dark childhoods? (It's like the New Yorker cartoon where the creative writing student calls up her parents and blames them for not giving her a more wounded childhood so she has good material.)
- Is solitary confinement necessary for great art? Must writers step off the traditional cultural path in order to create great art?
- Are happy writers better writers? Does happiness interfere with great art?
One thing Oates mentioned that was not dark: She says she's had many brilliant, talented students (at Princeton University), but some just fade off and don't really do anything. And then there are others who are dedicated, loyal, and intelligent of course but not flashy. One of those was Jodi Picoult, who she described as very methodical, modest, hardworking. And a final interesting bit: One person asked what Oates liked least about writing or the writing life. Her response: Writing a first draft, or those first six weeks. After nearly 50 books written and published, she still thinks to herself, "I just can't do it." She becomes nervous, every time. Nonfiction Critique SessionTonight I reviewed four nonfiction writing samples in a group setting, along with author Shirley Brosius. What struck me was the fierce passion of each author for their idea (or story) and their desire to have that shared with or validated and heard by others. When discussing intensely personal stories (usually memoir), it can be difficult, sitting on the opposite side of the table, to say, "Well, I know this story is meaningful, but why will anyone be interested? How will it sell?" I begin to sound like a real cold-hearted creep! Over a year's time, I hear dozens of personal stories that focus on grief, loss, tragedy, or sickness. (One agent I know calls them "autopathologies.") The writer is clearly attempting to make sense of an experience that has transformed his/her life, and turn it into something that can help others. The challenge is that few of today's readers visit a bookstore wondering what new book about grief and loss should be on their nightstand (hence, the success of series like Chicken Soup for the Soul or Cup of Comfort.) However, these same readers might be wondering: How can I solve this tragic problem I have? How can I become happier? (Self-help to the rescue!) For writers with a challenging personal story to tell, I usually advise: - Write it with heart-aching beauty so that no one can put it down.
- Find a freakish marketing angle. (I had a hard life because I had 2 heads!!)
Neither are easily accomplished. Conferences/Events | General | Getting Published
Friday, May 16, 2008 11:19:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
The No. 1 Requirement for a Good Experience
Posted by Jane
Last year, I started using a Web application for my to-do list, Gootodo. It's a brilliantly simple little tool that has streamlined my work life. Simple but useful tools are difficult to find. The creator of this tool, Mark Hurst, has an e-newsletter I subscribe to called Good Experience. His latest newsletter (and blog post) discusses the No. 1 requirement for a good experience, which goes against the grain of most business thinking: empathy. Empathy - the driving force behind good listening - is the number one requirement for anyone who wants to create a good experience. Not a long list of methods, not a scholarly knowledge of one's niche field - but empathy. Anyone can learn a method; but people who can listen, can pay attention, can see the experience from someone else's perspective, are rare and valuable.
Writing a book, for example, requires the author to constantly read and re-read the text from the perspective of the readers: will this make sense to them? Not to me, the author, but to someone who's coming at this fresh?
Throughout the years, my own company has been fairly good at this. We conduct surveys, focus groups, and make it easy for customers to contact us. Our editors are not protected from the random calls coming into reception from people who want to know how to get published. I believe we do listen. While F+W may not always succeed in delivering a good experience, at the very least we know what that good experience looks like, even if our own internal systems prevent us or limit us from delivering it! (One example is WritersMarket.com, which is an excellent tool, but still needs improvement—and that's a task we've been undertaking intensively for more than two years now.) But back to writers specifically: If you're writing a book, are you really focusing on the reader, or are you more concerned with publication or "spreading your message"? Of course there's nothing wrong with being motivated to spread a message, but what I find unique is when a writer wants to help or benefit others, and asks that question first and foremost. Then the writer has his focus on the right place: the marketplace. In fact, if more writers honestly asked themselves this question, would they still conclude that writing, publishing, and promoting a book is the best course of action? Building Readership | General | Getting Published
Friday, May 16, 2008 10:33:34 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
On the Road: Pennwriters Conference
Posted by Jane
 This morning I depart for a weekend at the Pennwriters annual conference (their 21st year), in Lancaster, Penn. Here's a glimpse of the activities. Friday night - 6p. Joyce Carol Oates delivers keynote speech at dinner.
- 8:30-11p. I read and critique nonfiction in groups with writers.
Saturday - 10:30-11:30a. I take pitches.
- Lunch: Speaker D.L. Wilson.
- 1:15-2:10p. I take pitches.
- Evening. Masquerade party.
Sunday - 9:15a-10:15a. I give a workshop on Nonfiction Queries and Submissions.
- 10:30-11:30a. I take pitches.
- Closing ceremonies at noon.
Other guests from inside the publishing industry include: - agent Irene Goodman
- agent Ginger Clark
- agent Jessica Regel
- agent Elaine P. English
- Avon editor Tessa Woodward
- HarperCollins editor Melanie Donovan
- Tor Books editor Paul Stevens
- Berkley editor Ginjer Buchanan
- agent Kim Lionetti
This is my third year speaking at Pennwriters—they always deliver an excellent program. If you're attending, I hope you'll find me and say hello. Conferences/Events
Friday, May 16, 2008 7:43:59 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Thursday, May 15, 2008
Trouble in Vending Machine Paradise
Posted by Jane
An update on the new vending machines at F+W, as told by this quaint photo essay.  The new vending machine needs a new part.  Teresa is a longtime veteran of F+W who works in the mail room, and has been instrumental in the new vending machine strategy.  Eh, who needs decaf anyway?  Coming soon to a conference room near you: New Vending Machine Training F+W Life
Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:28:28 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
(P.S.) E-books at Tipping Point
Posted by Jane
Today over at Publishers Weekly, they're reporting that “give the customers what they want” was the theme at Digital Book 2008. … publishers and technology developers sounded the same note over and
over again, pointing out that the Internet has given them unprecedented
access to consumer feedback, and that the way to grow the e-book market
is to listen to what readers are saying. “Power is shifting to the
consumer,” said Matt Shatz, v-p of digital at Random House.
Not exactly groundbreaking news, but you can read the full news item here. Digitization & New Technology
Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:41:35 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
E-publishing Trends, Part 2: The Advantages of E-books
Posted by Jane
My earlier post this week on e-publishing trends has sparked some excellent comments from people who are closer to that technology and business than I am (since I admittedly come from a company that does not currently offer e-book product, except random PDF downloads or CD/DVD compilations). Here's a little of what Susan Edwards from Ellora's Cave had to say: Ebooks also give advantages to readers and authors, especially new,
unknown writers. First, because the cost of production is so much
lower, we can sell books for less. That means readers are more willing
to take a chance on an unknown author. Second, there is no bookstore
shelf life to an ebook. A new author often has a very small window of
time in a bookstore to snag an audience before her books are removed
and shipped back to the publisher. If the book doesn't sell well in
that time, that author's going to have a difficult time getting the
next book published. Not so with an ebook, which can take as much time
as necessary to find its audience. Low overhead also means the
publisher can afford to take more chances on an unknown author or even
genre, and it changes the royalty equation. At Ellora's Cave, ebook
royalty percentages generally run about three times higher than print
royalties.
And, of course, there's that instant gratification. If you can't
sleep in the middle of the night, you can download that one you heard
about today instantly.
Self-publishing guru Dan Poynter also chimes in with all the reasons why he switched to e-books from print books long ago. I recall reading (and forgive me, I've forgotten where) about a soon-to-be world where we might visit bricks-and-mortar bookstores as usual, not necessarily to buy physical books, but as a browsing ground to find out what book we want to read next, then pull out our wireless reading device and download it while we're in the store, without buying a physical copy. This vision assumes a few things: - Visiting bookstores is a social or leisure activity, that will remain enjoyable in and of itself, even if we're not necessarily making a physical purchase. Obviously you can see the evidence of this with the cafe culture that has been integrated right into major bookstores.
- It's easier or more desirable to browse physical books or bookshelves, rather than try to do so on a computer. (This is easily disputed, although I don't know many people who go to Amazon just to kill time browsing? I always go with a very specific purchase in mind.)
- These physical bookstores will still need to turn a profit if they're not selling physical product; let's assume that when you download a book in a store, there's a way to track that sale back to that specific store, so they benefit.
As long as physical bookstores exist and stock product for people to browse or buy, they'll continue to have an impact on which authors are most in the public eye (for better or worse). This is kind of a tangent, but an important one, because I sense that many people in the e-publishing (and self-publishing) business hope that new technologies will take some of this power away. Very hard to say; if bookstores aren't the ones who are the major influencers in what the public sees and buys, someone else will play that role, whether Oprah figures, mass or niche social networks, etc.
Digitization & New Technology
Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:29:19 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Informal Contest: Can You Guess the Age of This Writer?
Posted by Jane
 The writer pictured above has been working for three days straight on a revision of his novel, before submitting it to agents and editors. I imagine this to be the central image in a public service announcement that warns against a writing career. Now for something very unfair: Please guess (in the comments of this post) the age of this writer. Hurry and comment soon, because if my featured writer discovers what I've done, I will likely have to remove all evidence tout de suite. Commence! Fun
Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:57:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
A New Dawn, A New Day at F+W Publications
Posted by Jane
For years I have waited for this day. The day that F+W Publications finally decided it would catch up with the times. The day that all F+W Publications' employees could have that satisfying feeling at the end of the day. The day that F+W Publications took a risk, because without risking one's self, how can we find our true self?  Today, we're getting new vending machines. (Photo shows our lobby sign making the announcement.) Now, before you joke, let me describe some of things we have observed or accidentally purchased in the old vending machines: - Orange Jell-O square with side packet of mayonnaise
- Peeled, boiled eggs floating in a small watery puddle
- Feathery green Sno Balls
We've been told these new vending machines will offer real coffee and even ice cream. And possibly Pepsi in cans. F+W Life
Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:31:36 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
|
|