|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (8) |
| October, 2009 (18) |
| September, 2009 (22) |
| August, 2009 (15) |
| July, 2009 (22) |
| June, 2009 (19) |
| May, 2009 (18) |
| April, 2009 (25) |
| March, 2009 (19) |
| February, 2009 (21) |
| January, 2009 (18) |
| December, 2008 (3) |
| November, 2008 (12) |
| October, 2008 (13) |
| September, 2008 (24) |
| August, 2008 (27) |
| July, 2008 (26) |
| June, 2008 (34) |
| May, 2008 (36) |
| April, 2008 (2) |
|
Search
Archives
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, July 01, 2008
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#7)
Posted by Jane
At conferences, you can spot them from miles away. They’re the
ones who have been beaten down by years of rejection, the ones who
believe the publishing industry is working against them … the ones who have lost all hope and faith and are now looking for someone to blame (or at least someone to complain to). Who am I talking about? The bitter writers. SABOTAGE #7: BECOME BITTERI've often had bitter writers respond to my rejection letters with strident explanations of why the
rejection is wrong, or accusing me of bad
judgment. (Unfortunately, the more I try to engage such people in a rational discussion of the reasons behind a rejection, the less they are convinced, and the angrier they get … which is probably one reason why few editors/agents like to write detailed rejection letters.) Part of what I see here is an inability to separate the personal aspect from the business aspect. I treat rejection as a part of my business day; writers take it as a personal affront, and being unable to bridge the gap produces animosity toward each other at the end of the day. You can avoid this bitterness trap by understanding the industry, understanding why it works the way it does, and having the right expectations (or, no expectations). I'll end with another quote as to the larger implications: "A great secret of success is to go through life as a man who never gets used up" (Albert Schweitzer). And also from Schweitzer: "Success is not the key to happiness. Happiness is the key to success." Related blog postsHow to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#6)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#5)
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#4)
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#3)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#2)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#1) General | Getting Published
Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:06:40 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Someone Is Trying to Tell You Something!
Posted by Jane
New Titles From F+W | Sneak Peek
Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:51:06 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, June 30, 2008
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#6)
Posted by Jane
On this one, I'm cutting to the chase:
SABOTAGE #6: ASSUMING A WORK DEEPLY FELT BY YOU WILL BE DEEPLY FELT BY ALL
This is a strange one. I always feel a little mean mentioning it, and I also feel like it's painfully obvious. Yet again and again, without fail, at every writing conference, I meet a writer who assumes I will be interested in their work simply because it's about a transformational or life-changing or soulful experience. Writers who are so wholly consumed—who have become different people because of the ideas or story they are conveying—tend to automatically assume it will interest editors or agents just because it’s something they know or deeply experienced or worked hard on.
Unfortunately, it’s not enough to have written a great work, experienced a life-changing event, or be an expert in the field. You may feel you have an important message to share, but you have to be
able to connect that message to an identifiable MARKET. You must be
able to establish a readership and a market for your work if you want
to interest a commercial or for-profit publishing house; nothing else will matter to them, apart from amazing, fall-off-your-chair writing. In big-picture terms, I'll quote the great philosopher Schopenhauer: "Most men are so thoroughly subjective that nothing really interests them but themselves. They always think of their own case as soon as any remark is made, and their whole attention engrossed and absorbed by the merest chance reference to anything which affects them personally, be it ever so remote."
General | Getting Published
Monday, June 30, 2008 4:49:09 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Sneak Peek at Alien Invasion Survival Handbook
Posted by Jane
Next spring (2009), HOW Books will release a handbook on how to defend yourself from aliens. I just saw the sales materials cross my desk and wanted to share some images with you. Immediately below is the cover image.  Here are a few defensive moves you should know about, in case aliens should invade before the book releases. The first is the eye gouge, the second is the choking maneuver.   I recommend you print out a copy of this post and keep it in your wallet, should disaster strike. Fun | Sneak Peek
Monday, June 30, 2008 2:59:46 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
How to Stay Viable as Publisher: Just Produce Quality Content
Posted by Jane
It is now mid-year, and that means everyone is starting to discuss mid-year performance (and individual performance). Right now I'm in the process of summarizing the 2009 outlook for my imprints at F+W, my new publishing initiatives, and anything else that proves my area will be more profitable next year rather than less profitable. Just in time, there is a fabulous article today in the Washington Post by respected publishing veteran Jonathan Karp. He directs an imprint called Twelve (which publishes 12 books each year). He discusses the pressure on publishing houses to be profitable, and summarizes the ugly options, of which I am all too familiar:
1. Add more titles to augment sales. (I hate this option the most. More titles, more work, usually fewer sales … plus you inevitably publish titles of lesser quality.)
2. Sell more copies of existing authors and titles. (As Karp points out, most executives don't accept this as a viable option when the industry is flat, at best.)
3. Ask popular authors to "increase output."
4. Diversify your "product line."
5. Cut costs, pray to the gods of movie tie-in paperback editions or
hope that one of your authors gets his or her own talk show.
The final paragraphs of Karp's article offer hope that we can all soon get off this infuriating treadmill of more-more-more product. Emerging technologies will eventually give publishers only one way of standing out in the market: quality product. (Imagine that!) He says: … publishers will be forced to invest in works of quality to maintain
their niche. These books will be the one product that only they can
deliver better than anyone else. Those same corporate executives who
dictate annual returns may begin to proclaim the virtues of research
and development, the great engine of growth for business. For
publishers, R&D means giving authors the resources to write the
best books -- works that will last, because the lasting books will,
ultimately, be where the money is.
Read the entire article at the Washington Post, "Turning the Page on the Disposable Book."
Digitization & New Technology | F+W Life | General | Industry News & Trends
Monday, June 30, 2008 11:39:38 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Notes From the Slush Pile
Posted by Jane
Candy Gourlay over at Notes From the Slush Pile has been kind enough to notice my series on how to avoid sabotaging your writing career (which continues this week, so stay tuned). Be sure to visit Candy's blog if you're interested in the children's/YA genre, lots of up-to-date industry info. Industry News & Trends
Monday, June 30, 2008 9:36:23 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Friday, June 27, 2008
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#5)
Posted by Jane
At a recent writers conference, I heard a literary agent say that one of her top criteria when deciding whether or not to represent an author was: Could she spend eight hours in an airport with that person and like them afterward?Here in my office, we all try to avoid working with or becoming the dreaded PITA (Pain In The Ass). Word to the wise: If you ever see a PITA surcharge on an invoice you receive, you are one of those people. The next sabotage is pretty clear, yes? #5 SABOTAGE: BE HIGH MAINTENANCE
No editor or agent wants to take on a project or an author that will drive them crazy, suck up all their time and energy, or make extensive demands. What characterizes high-maintenance authors?- Demands answers immediately; e-mails or calls repeatedly; everything is urgent
- Insists on having everything their way
- Unwillingness to negotiate or compromise; general inflexibility
- Tremendous self-importance (ego, ego, ego)
- Demands everyone else conform to their schedule and preferences
Editors and agents fall in LOVE with people who are:- Confident in themselves, but not egotistical
- Flexible and know how to compromise or handle change
- Strive for excellence; seek every opportunity to improve their work
- Have a positive attitude and don't play the victim
A few additional words about the author-editor dynamic, and a thank-you to Executive Editor Kelly Nickell for these points: - It’s likely that you and your editor will have some good and bad times.
- It’s easy to be kind during the good times, but it’s just as important—if not more so—to be kind during the bad times.
- Remember that your editor is your voice—your supporter and champion—within the publishing house. If you throw a tantrum or resort to name-calling, etc., your editor is likely to come to think of you as a “problem author.”
It falls on your editor to create and maintain in-house interest in your project. She’s the one responsible for making sure that your book doesn’t get overlooked by sales and marketing. Cultivating a strong partnership with your editor (as well as your agent) is vital to the future success of your book. The overarching lesson: Be a pleasure to work with, rather than someone that people take pains to avoid. Related posts How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#4) How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#3)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#2)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#1) General | Getting Published
Friday, June 27, 2008 2:02:58 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
New Release: Writing Life Stories, 2nd edition
Posted by Jane
 Almost exactly 10 years ago, Story Press (a former imprint of F+W Publications) released a fabulous instruction book by Bill Roorbach, Writing Life Stories. I'm thrilled to announce that we've just released a second edition of this valuable text, still under the Story Press imprint, in what we're calling the 10-year anniversary edition. In this new edition, Bill (with the help of Kristen Keckler) has taken care to fully update and revise the text. In his preface, he writes: So much has changed in the ten years since the first edition of Writing Life Stories was published. For writers, perhaps the biggest development has been the wholesale advent of the Internet, with its constant evolution, its endless opportunities for interaction, for instant research, for locating and speaking directly to readers via e-mail, blogs, and Web sites. Everyone's typing now. …
Memoir as a popular genre has moved past most of its early controversies, and enjoys new standing in the world of letters and in the university. But there's also brand-new hullabaloo, such as the James Frey scandal … or the Deborah Rodriguez dustup … And is this the end of the world? Of course it's not. That roar you hear comes from the explosive power of narrative as applied to real life. What is the role of memoir and the essay in the quest for truth? Or even Truth? You'll answer these questions over and over, always in your own way, with every paragraph you write. …
Old friends of Writing Life Stories will find plenty here to re-charge their batteries, lots of new ideas and fresh instruction. First-time readers will join those returning to find new exercises in every chapter, clearer explanations of difficult issues like the use of metaphor, more up-to-date information on publishing, examples from newer writers, and more recent titles to complement the dozens of examples in the original edition, and a much more sophisticated look at the Internet.
Phillip Lopate and Lee Gutkind were kind enough to praise the first edition, and this second edition is even better. Be sure to check it out if you're actively writing or teaching creative nonfiction; we've posted an excerpt from Chapter 2 on our site, "Challenging the Limits of Memory." Craft & Technique | Excerpts | New Titles From Writer's Digest
Friday, June 27, 2008 1:39:39 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Thursday, June 26, 2008
How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#4)
Posted by Jane
This shouldn't be news to you, but the Internet affects your ability to get published—whether for the first time or the second time. When editors/agents receive a query, proposal, or manuscript, they almost always Google the author, and check out the strength of the author's Web presence, reviews,
and publication history (if any), and involvement with a particular community. Professionals can form an impression (and perhaps even reach a
conclusion) before reading a word of the author’s actual manuscript, meaning:
#4 SABOTAGE: TREATING ONLINE AND MULTIMEDIA ACTIVITIES AS OPTIONAL
Often, the most efficient and effective way to reach a readership is online, through Web sites, blogs, interviews, discussion groups, etc. If you haven't noticed, today’s pop culture thrives on multimedia entertainment, the interactivity of social networks and messaging, and the instant shiny gratification of iPhones and search engines. Progressive publishers and authors must look beyond the power of words alone to stimulate readers. As a smart acquisitions editor and editorial director, I have to search for projects that can go beyond the printed book. The F+W sales and marketing division is no longer satisfied with a great print product; I have to envision how the content can be shaped and promoted online, in digital formats, and through multimedia channels. My company will eventually cease being a book publisher and become a media/content company. Will you, as an author, be prepared? How will you and your content be defined or delivered in an online or digital environment? Larger life lesson: It's not just about the culture any more (or "young" people), but the very way we consume and create knowledge. Our very brains are changing. (Read this article in Atlantic magazine, Is Google Making Us Stupid?) Related postsHow to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#3)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#2)How to Avoid Sabotaging Your Writing Career (#1) Digitization & New Technology | General | Getting Published
Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:57:26 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Forgotten Fashion Has Arrived!
Posted by Jane
 Advance copies of Forgotten Fashion by Kate Hahn ( TOW Books) have arrived at our offices! As the subtitle indicates, this book is an illustrated faux history of outrageous trends and their untimely demise. It's quite simply brilliant, and the staff was feasting on our fresh copies this morning. (That's a "Frigidaire Formal" on the book cover.) (From L to R: Associate Editor Melissa Hill, Managing Editor Alice Pope [who was editor on the book], Managing Editor Amy Schell)
One of the more memorable fashions: "Emotionally Distressed Jeans: The Brainchild of Business and Psychology." Here's a brief snippet.
Displayed between two sheets of Plexiglas in an ultramodern Tokyo penthouse apartment is one of the world’s rarest pairs of blue jeans, preserved with the care usually reserved for an antique kimono. Like many late-1990s indigos, the pair is artificially distressed: faded, torn, and whiskered. Yet it was not created by a high-end denim designer, but a depressed, freshman girl at an American university. It was a product of the Emotionally Distressed Jeans project, an exclusive line available only on the black market to an elite group of extremely wealthy consumers.
The jeans were the brainchild of a secret partnership between two groups of graduate students—psychology and business—at the University of Pennsylvania. They believed that negative emotions, instead of being quashed with the decade’s drug of choice, Prozac, should be expressed and channeled into lucrative endeavors. Unbeknownst to UPenn administrators, they tested this out by giving a fresh pair of stiff indigo jeans to every student who visited the school’s mental health counseling center. The recipients were instructed to take out all their frustration and anxiety on the denim—rather than themselves or their friends—for a week. Seven days later, the “emotionally distressed” jeans were returned to the center, along with a logbook listing the methods used to create the damages.
F+W Life | Fun | New Titles From F+W
Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:28:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
|
|