|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
Search
Archives
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, September 09, 2008
When a Book Cover Needs to Be Rushed
Posted by Jane
At F+W, we route color proofs of book covers for approval, and sometimes they can get "stuck" in someone's inbox. Our production coordinator extraordinaire (Mark G.) included a note on a recent cover to avoid any delays …  F+W Life | Fun
9/9/2008 3:20:27 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
10 Years in Publishing: What I've Learned (#2)
Posted by Jane
 Today's photo features me as a F+W intern (summer 1997) at a photoshoot
for North Light's first decorative painting book by Donna Dewberry.
Editor Kathy Kipp acted as photographer, and there I am in the background—acting as the
light-switcher-on-and-offer (and shot list keeper). And now for the second installment of what I've learned: Crappy writing is the norm in prescriptive (or informative) nonfiction.
Put another way—a nicer way: great ideas rule. Whether you're looking to: - lose weight
- make money
- find love
- (or … even write better!)
You're
probably not seeking great literature. Rather, you're looking for
clear, authoritative, and compelling information that improves your
life, enriches your life, or makes life easier. You want a solid benefit, so the
book succeeds if it delivers on its promise, not if it is beautifully
written. People inside the industry—editors, salespeople,
marketing managers—all of them are looking for a great selling handle
backed up by great content. Why? The great selling handle gets the book sold into stores, in large quantities. Great content makes sure the book sells through the register, into readers' hands.
A
successful book needs both of these things, at minimum. But it does NOT need great
writing. Most people who specialize in great information or
helpful advice, and have the authority to dispense it (whether we're
talking about parenting, money, sex, etc)—these people do not typically have any writing skill (or even the desire to write). But most readers will not notice, or care. That's
why most nonfiction books are sold on the basis of a proposal (which is
like a business plan for a book idea), not on an actual manuscript. F+W Life | Getting Published
9/9/2008 2:50:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
How to Fail at Publishing in a Whole New Way
Posted by Jane
 Today at Maud Newton, John Warner (creative director of TOW Books), summarizes the new strategy of the TOW Books line: Now, after two years of, let’s call it, non-success, I understand that
the problem is at least as much about publicity and distribution as it
is about quality. (At least I hope that’s the problem.) So I’m here to
announce that if TOW Books is going to fail at publishing, we are going
to fail in our own spectacularly new way.
How badly are we struggling? Well, we’ve released four books. Their Amazon rankings at the time of this typing are:
170,374
388,165
706,198
1,033,377
The most distressing part is that last number belongs to a book I wrote, So You Want to Be President?
— a book that should have been especially relevant and timely given
that it’s a guide to running for office when totally unqualified. I
hope it’s in Governor Palin’s briefing materials.
Read the full post here. Building Readership | General | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Marketing & Self-Promotion
9/9/2008 2:31:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, September 08, 2008
10 Years in Publishing: What I've Learned (#1)
Posted by Jane
 To celebrate my 10 years with F+W Media, this week I'm blogging on five things I've learned after ten years in the business. Above I've posted a lovely photo of moi (taken by HR) on my first day of trade publishing life: August 3, 1998. If you like that photo, just wait. I'll post some more treasures from those glory years. What I've learned #1: Many authors claim they want good editors—and bemoan the fact that editors don't edit any more—but few authors graciously accept thorough editing and attention from their editors (when it does occur).
You often hear these days that editors no longer edit—that they're too busy doing other things, like meeting with sales and marketing, creating innovative products to compete with digital media, or simply managing the day-to-day tasks of producing dozens of titles per year. What I've found, though, is that an editor's life can be made miserable if she offers up a thorough development or content edit, because the author's ego (or attitude) gets in the way. This already sounds like terrible, horrible cliche—the writer vs. editor, us vs. them mentality that, frankly, is quite tired and tiresome for me. Let's try to take this a step further then, shall we? Perhaps even into positive territory! 1. First, remind yourself that the editor is trying to make the best book possible, and the suggestions/edits are meant to improve the book and help it succeed. Now, some editors have poor bedside manner (they only make negative comments; they never sprinkle in positive comments or helpful encouragement). I myself am guilty of this. But you must look past it. This editor wouldn't have agreed to work with you if she didn't believe in your idea, in your work, or in you. The admiration is there—the editing process is getting down to brass tacks, it is a laser-like focus on How can we take this to the next level? The edits aren't there to tell you what you did wrong. The edits are there to provide an outsider's perspective as well as an expert's perspective on your work. This should be invaluable feedback for improving your work and your own skills. If you're scanning the editor's comments looking only for variations of "What a genius you are!" you've completely misunderstood the editor's role. She's not there to bolster your self-worth. She's there to push you and challenge you. 2. You will inevitably disagree with some of the editor's suggestions. This is natural, this is expected, and this is nothing to get upset about.The editor is not always right, of course. But there's no reason to get angry if you disagree with her suggestions; anger or frustration over edits is wasted energy. Why? See Point 3 below. Also: Occasionally I work as a freelance copyeditor, and I'm always befuddled when I'm (frequently) told by the assigning editor, "Don't go too heavy or the author will freak out." Why do authors consider it a bad thing when their work is tightened, clarified, or otherwise improved? As a writer myself, I actually do know why. Because we become far too attached to our own words; we see them as extensions of our mind, heart, or soul. To see any of it cut—it's like having an internal organ dug out with a spoon. Guess what? It's time to stop treating our words as hallowed ground. If you find yourself disagreeing with everything the editor says, then evaluate whether you both have the same vision for the work. Has there been a critical misunderstanding as far as what the work is supposed to achieve? Obviously there can be different perspectives even when you're both headed for the same goal, but everyone's in trouble if you can't find common ground on the fundamental issues of unique selling point (of the book), target audience, and how to approach that audience. 3. Have a conversation with the editor (via phone or e-mail) in instances where you have a differing viewpoint.Again, the key is to have a productive conversation—and not flare up or lash out when your work is being revised, questioned, or cut apart. The editor will greatly respect you if you take the following approach in each conversation: a) Clearly identify the edit/suggestion that you have differing opinions on. b) Summarize why you think the editor wants you to make the change. If a reason was not given by the editor, ask why the change or revision was suggested. c) Once you fully understand why the change was suggested, explain either why you think the original version should remain, or suggest an alternative solution.
The key here is that when you explain (c), it should tie into what's best for the reader, the market, or the book. Any editor worth her salt will hear you out, and she'll be persuaded to your way of thinking if your argument is sound. Most writers are not very good at self-editing—it is an incredibly rare skill. It's why most writers belong to critique groups, so they can get hopefully impartial feedback that will help them improve their work. It's also part of your skill set to learn how to work effectively with editors. It may not come naturally at first, but if you're lucky enough to have a dedicated editor—an editor who edits—it's a gift. Learn how to take advantage of it, not get upset over it. Craft & Technique | F+W Life | General | Getting Published
9/8/2008 3:07:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, September 03, 2008
The Differences Between Imprints at Book Publishers
Posted by Jane
There's a great post (that will become a series) at Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind that explains the differences between imprints at book publishers. Must-read material for aspiring book authors (and hey, for agents and people inside the industry too!). A snippet: Something else that might help would be to take Thomas Dunne's name
off of any minotaur titles they acquire, because I'm sorry, which
imprint is it? Or is it St. Martin's? Way too much confusion, please
pick one (which would be Minotaur, of course.) As for Thomas Dunne Books,
um, well....I think of small titles that make money on the library
market? To be fair, Dunne's been around publishing for something like
40 years and the "something for everybody" attitude worked in a world
of single-digit television channels. Now, not so much. Will the name
survive when Dunne retires? Somehow I doubt it.
Click here to visit the full post. Getting Published | Industry News & Trends
9/3/2008 2:23:08 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Some Things About Writing Never Change (e.g, Huge Army of Disappointed Scribblers)
Posted by Jane
This week I received a great message from an attendee of the Sacramento State Workshop, where I was a workshop presenter a few weeks ago. ( You can find my recap of the workshop here.) Teresa Fleming says: … please don't apologize for the times you have to be discouraging. It's for the best, you know. Of course, you should also know this is coming from someone who: (1) has no memoir plans, and (2) spent a couple of decades in the banking business. (Really, Ms. Smith, I am doing you a favor declining your million-dollar request for a loan to open a fuzzy-cheese-head-car-airfreshener-thingy business.) To close, here are a few quotes for fun. I do a bit of volunteer smoothreading (sort of like proofreading but more relaxed) for Distributed Proofreaders / Project Gutenberg. The day before your presentation, I finished a smoothy on a short book titled If You Don't Write Fiction by Charles Phelps Cushing (1920). Here are a couple of my favorites—some things don't change much, huh?
A huge army of disappointed scribblers have followed that haphazard plan of battle. They would know better than to try to market crates of eggs to a shoe store, but they see nothing equally absurd in shipping a popular science article to the Atlantic Monthly or an "uplift" essay to the Smart Set. They paper their walls with rejection slips, fill up a trunk with returned manuscripts and pose before their sympathetic friends as martyrs. … Which is to say that novelists and magazine fiction writers are accused of becoming more concerned about how their stories will film than about how the manuscripts will grade as pieces of literature. To get a yarn into print is still worth while because this enhances its value in the eyes of the producers of motion pictures. But the author's real goal is "no longer good writing, so much as remunerative picture possibilities."
Many thanks to Teresa for sharing a little bit of the 1920's writing advice! ( You can download the entire text from Google.) Stay tuned for a few excerpts from Writer's Digest titles from that era. (Yes, Writer's Digest did exist in the Roaring Twenties, and much of the advice we give has remained the same!) Fun | General | Getting Published
9/3/2008 1:38:37 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Writer Mama Back-to-School Daily Giveaway
Posted by Jane
Conferences/Events | Fun | General
9/2/2008 9:20:41 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Friday, August 29, 2008
Student's for McCain
Posted by Jane
Here's a big OOPS that WDB editor Lauren Mosko uncovered this morning from John McCain's online store. She says, "Wonder how long before someone alerts them and they take it down ...?"  Fun
8/29/2008 9:36:29 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Thursday, August 28, 2008
 Wednesday, August 27, 2008
News From Glimmer Train
Posted by Jane
Glimmer Train just announced the winners of their June Fiction Open competition. All winners will be published in an upcoming issue of Glimmer Train Stories. First place ($2,000)Shimon Tanaka (San Francisco, CA) “The Suit” Second place ($1,000)Christine Sneed (Evanston, IL) "Twelve + Twelve" Third place ($600)Horatio Potter (Wilsall, MT) “Summer Help” A PDF of the top 25 winners can be found here. This quarterly competition is open to all writers and all themes (word count range is 2,000–20,000). Submissions may be sent for the September Fiction Open using the Glimmer Train online submissions system at www.glimmertrain.org. Also: Very Short Fiction contest (deadline soon approaching! August 31)Glimmer Train hosts this contest twice a year, and first place is a very generous $1,200 plus publication in the journal. It's open to all writers, but stories cannot exceed 3,000 words. According to the site, it is rare for a piece of 500 words or less to be selected. Click here for complete guidelines.If you didn't know, Writer's Digest partnered with Glimmer Train to publish two compilation volumes of the best stuff from their Writers Ask newsletter. Be sure to check them out.  General | Getting Published
8/27/2008 3:16:44 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Take Our Quick Survey on Writing and Critique Groups
Posted by Jane
As you might've read late last week, Writer's Digest wants to know your thoughts on participating in writing groups and critique groups. Have you ever been part of an active critique group? Did your writing improve? Would you buy a book on the subject? Take this short 10-question survey, and let us know what you think! https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Y6cvGHFtAdXoJbVL1rSNzg_3d_3d
So far, the comments we've received through various blog postings have been excellent. After reviewing the comments, it appears a useful book would include the following features, benefits, or information: The Basics - The difference between writers' groups and critique groups
- Open groups vs. closed groups; other types of groups; ideal group size
- How to start a group; how to run a group; multiple techniques/strategies for hosting
- How to develop ground rules for a group
- Compatibility between group members (skill level, genre, etc)
- How to be a productive member
- How to avoid "bad" groups and find "good" groups; questions to ask a group before joining
- Typical bad experiences and how to avoid them
- Handling conflict and other communication skills
- Questionnaires for forming groups and finding the "right" members
- How to shake up a group that's gone stagnant
Critiquing - When listening/encouragement are more important than a critique
- How to go beyond "I like it" or "I don't like it"
- How to adapt feedback to the level of writer you're critiquing
- Multiple techniques for critiquing; guidelines for different types of critiques
- How to receive or listen to critiques; questions to ask your critiquers
- How to incorporate feedback into your work; judging your own work
- Critique checklists
Other - Joining online groups vs. local/regional groups
- Case studies or profiles of successful groups
- Exercises/prompts for different types or levels of group; adapting prompts for group use
- How do you find a group that's the right fit for you? Or how does one find a group, period?
- Provide a directory or "match" service?
Craft & Technique | General
8/26/2008 3:32:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, August 25, 2008
When Cakes Go Horribly Wrong
Posted by Jane
A little bit of fun at the office today: Someone on the team discovered Cake Wrecks, a site featuring terrible and horrible (and sometimes morally objectionable) cake decorations. Categories of "wrecks" include: Beyond Bizarre, Close-Your-Eyes, Creative Grammar, Creepy, Just Funny, Mithspellings, and Oh-So-Ugly. A few of my favorites:  Looks like the e-mail message didn't translate so well.  Hard to imagine placing the order for (or decorating) this cake.  I guess there's never a bad reason to have cake? Fun
8/25/2008 4:40:55 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Friday, August 22, 2008
Woman Arrested for Not Returning Library Books
Posted by Jane
In case you thought librarians were softies, check out this news story from Milwaukee television. (Thanks to Melissa for the link!)  Fun
8/22/2008 3:07:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
Writing and Critique Groups: How Many Are There?
Posted by Jane
Every week at F+W, we have a pub board meeting where sales, marketing, and editorial teams discuss new projects for publication. It's the editor's job to convince the sales team that we have a viable book idea (with the right author) that will sell. This morning, we pitched a book on writing and critique groups. While anecdotal evidence tells us that most writers do participate in some form of critiquing (whether as part of a formal group or not), we don't have hard evidence. So the sales people tabled the project until we could return with information that substantiated our claims. They also disputed whether writers would spend their money on a book about writing groups and critiquing, even if they are an active writing group member. So we're putting together a survey that will soon go out to Writer's Digest newsletter subscribers, to see what data we can collect. I'd love to hear from readers of this blog as well, if you know of any information/data that would be useful to us. (And if you have a blog, perhaps you can post on this topic and gather feedback too!) Ultimately, I'd love to create a groundswell of discussion that will convince our sales team that this idea deserves realization as a physical book. F+W Life | General
8/22/2008 10:22:54 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, August 19, 2008
BEA Pitch Slam Success Story
Posted by Jane
 Just received this news from agent Janet Reid (thanks for pointing out, Chuck!) Then there was that BEA Writers Digest Pitch Slam conference. I bitched and moaned and whined so much about going that Chuck forced me, yes FORCED me, to find a great writer, sign her, and sell her book for six figures. I blame Chuck entirely for that failure of expectations.
Chuck comments, "She's being sarcastic, of course, but she DID sign a client there and sell her book for six figures." Conferences/Events | Getting Published
8/19/2008 5:37:35 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, August 18, 2008
Is Your Memoir Kind of Like Those Horrible Singers on American Idol?
Posted by Jane
A freelancer and colleague, Jana Reiss, e-mailed me a few comments about my last blog post that I wanted to share. (Jana is a former reviewer at Publishers Weekly.) At PW I would get a lot of self-published memoirs for review, and authors never quite understood why I wasn't assigning their work. I couldn't exactly say, "Your writing sucks," even if that happened to be true, but I would tell them the same kinds of things you are saying here -- that unless you already have a celebrity platform or some kind of wonderful eat-pray-love kind of experience, no one outside your immediate circle is usually going to care what you have to say.
I laughed when I saw your description of writers who rely on their friends and family to tell them that their writing is terrific and sure to be featured on Oprah. I was on a panel once with an editor who asked all the first-time writers in the audience if they had ever seen the early episodes of American Idol. Most had. He said something like, "Those people who can't sing are always telling Simon Cowell, 'But my friends and my parents say I'm a really great singer!' And those people are horrible singers. You need a professional opinion." It was a great analogy and, judging from the uncomfortable looks of many people in the audience, he got his point across.
Another technique I have tried when speaking to writers is to ask them about the memoirs they have read recently. What did they like about them? Then I point out that the memoirs they have mentioned are without exception either a) written by celebrities or b) already bestsellers. It's a sobering thing when they realize that if THEY don't read memoir when it's not already water-cooler talk, why should anyone plunk down $24.95 for their story?
Many thanks to Jana for sharing her advice! More people need to hear it. Craft & Technique | Getting Published
8/18/2008 12:15:37 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Sunday, August 17, 2008
On the Road: SSU Writers' Workshop (And: Memoir/Storytelling Tips)
Posted by Jane
 Today was the final day of the Sacramento State University Writers' Conference; I arrived on Friday and have been meeting with writers and speaking since early on Saturday morning. This afternoon I was off-duty and walked to a nearby Borders (pictured above)—the first time I've walked into a bookstore flanked with palm trees. But down to business. Saturday (early morning): Manuscript CritiquesBefore the conference, I was sent 20-page manuscript samples from five writers. Four of the five were memoir or life story manuscripts. Let me state right out that memoir is difficult to do well, yet lots of people are attempting it. If you're not a celebrity, then your story has to survive on the art and craft of the writing, or your sharp and unique perspective—no easy feat for a new or inexperienced writer. Of the manuscripts I read, they tended to be: - Very raw and personal. This makes it difficult to revise with the requisite distance. Some of the manuscripts I read used excerpts from journals/diaries, which is usually not a good idea if we're talking about producing publishable work.
- Lacking a story arc. The reader needs to have a reason to keep reading, to feel like they are in the hands of an experienced storyteller. Even the life or the experience seems chaotic and without shape, there needs to be a shape and order on the page.
- Cathartic. Writing is an excellent way to find or make meaning out of painful and confusing experiences. But such writing isn't necessarily publishable. Personal essay and memoir has to go beyond a cathartic experience (that benefits the writer alone) and give the reader a compelling reason to keep reading.
Saturday (mid-morning): Speed PitchingI participated in a two-hour pitch session, where writers had three minutes to pitch their projects to editors/agents, one-on-one. Again, I encountered many writers trying to tell their life stories or family stories. RED FLAG: Memoir & Life StoryI can't begin to tell you how often I hear the following at writer's conferences (and from writers all over the map): - "My friends and family love my stories. They said I should write them down."
- "I wrote this just for my family, but they said it should be a published book."
- "My [family member] had an amazing life. Her stories deserve to be written and published so they're not lost forever."
What I'm about to say may appear cold, unfeeling, or downright mean, but: OK: Your life stories or family stories are unique and deserve to be shared. But do they deserve book publication? Or, more importantly, do you have the talent to tell these stories through the written word so that they do deserve book publication?
Everyone forgets that writing is a craft that takes years of dedication and practice to become skilled at. If you haven't been practicing the craft for years, there is little chance that your initial efforts to write your life story or memoir will be publishable, and even then, only with an incredible amount of hard work and revision. The same is true for fiction writers, of course. Very few novelists ever publish their first manuscript. Or second. Or third. Or fourth. It takes time before you get good—in any genre. The truth is: You could have the most sensational, unusual story ever, or the most boring story ever, but whether it's successful on the page all depends on your skill as a storyteller and as a writer—and not everyone has this skill. Period. Friends and family give bad advice. Don't forget that. They may love your stories, but they also love you (presumably!). That's why they're telling you to write and publish. When I meet discouraged memoirists and personal essayists, I think (unashamedly): Good! It's good that you're getting tired of it, that you're getting frustrated. It means you don't have what it takes, and you need to move onto something else. Book writing and publishing is not a money maker, it is not going to bring you fame and celebrity, and it will not bring in a flood of readers. It will likely disappoint. If you must have something for posterity, self-publish. Or save your money and save your stories in a Word document that you back up on multiple hard drives. OK. Off soapbox. Keynote: Dinah Lenney
Now that I've said my piece about aspiring memoirists (apologies to all memoirists!), let me talk about Dinah, who gave the keynote and has a published memoir. Her talk focused primarily on memoir, and it was the best talk I've ever heard on the genre. Generous, honest, funny. Her main point was that memoir is a performance that's driven by your voice or your presence. It's not necessarily the content, but your "cover" of the content. That is: Memoirists "cover" the past, take on the past, riff on the past, filter it and interpret it for an audience. She also had a great quote from Stendhal, "The heart can make anything seem important." It reminded me of a series on storytelling by Ira Glass. Here's the first in the series. (I may have already referenced this before, but it's worth referencing again.)
My Sessions For those who would like the PowerPoint presentations from my sessions (as PDFs), here they are!
Many thanks to the board members of the Sac State workshop, particularly Amy Ruddell, Verna Dreisbach, and Bill Pieper.
If you'd like to read some blog posts about the conference, visit this site. Conferences/Events | Craft & Technique | Getting Published
8/17/2008 6:12:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Saturday, August 16, 2008
100 Foods to Eat
Posted by Jane
I found this food challenge through a Cincinnati blog called Wine Me, Dine Me. The rules are: 1. Copy this 100-item list on your blog or site. 2. Bold the foods you've eaten. 3. Strike through foods you will not eat. 4. Post a comment on Very Good Taste (where the challenge originates). I feel I'm at a disadvantage since I stick to a vegetarian diet (well, usually), but I've knocked through nearly 50% of the list at this point in life. ———— 1. Venison 2. Nettle tea 3. Huevos rancheros4. Steak tartare 5. Crocodile 6. Black pudding 7. Cheese fondue8. Carp 9. Borscht 10. Baba ghanoush11. Calamari12. Pho 13. Peanut butter and jelly sandwich14. Aloo gobi15. Hot dog from a street cart16. Epoisses 17. Black truffle18. Fruit wine made from something other than grapes19. Steamed pork buns 20. Pistachio ice cream21. Heirloom tomatoes22. Fresh wild berries23. Foie gras 24. Rice and beans25. Brawn or head cheese 26. Raw Scotch Bonnet pepper 27. Dulce de leche28. Oysters 29. Baklava30. Bagna cauda 31. Wasabi peas32. Clam chowder in a sourdough bowl 33. Salted lassi 34. Sauerkraut35. Root beer float36. Cognac with a fat cigar 37. Clotted cream tea38. Vodka jelly 39. Gumbo 40. Oxtail 41. Curried goat 42. Whole insects 43. Phaal 44. Goat’s milk45. Malt whisky from a bottle worth £60/$120 or more 46. Fugu 47. Chicken tikka masala48. Eel 49. Krispy Kreme original glazed doughnut50. Sea urchin 51. Prickly pear 52. Umeboshi 53. Abalone 54. Paneer55. McDonald’s Big Mac Meal56. Spaetzle57. Dirty gin martini 58. Beer above 8% ABV59. Poutine 60. Carob chips61. S’mores62. Sweetbreads 63. Kaolin 64. Currywurst 65. Durian 66. Frogs’ legs67. Beignets, churros, elephant ears or funnel cake68. Haggis 69. Fried plantain70. Chitterlings or andouillette 71. Gazpacho72. Caviar and blini 73. Louche absinthe 74. Gjetost, or brunost 75. Roadkill 76. Baijiu 77. Hostess Fruit Pie78. Snail79. Lapsang souchong 80. Bellini 81. Tom yum 82. Eggs Benedict 83. Pocky84. Tasting menu at a three-Michelin-star restaurant85. Kobe beef 86. Hare 87. Goulash88. Flowers89. Horse 90. Criollo chocolate 91. Spam92. Soft shell crab93. Rose harissa 94. Catfish95. Mole poblano96. Bagel and lox97. Lobster Thermidor 98. Polenta99. Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee100. Snake Fun
8/16/2008 8:26:59 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
 Thursday, August 14, 2008
Do You Treat Writing Like a LOVER on the Side?
Posted by Jane
 Speaking as an editor/publisher, some books will always hold a special place in my heart, long after they've been published and ceased being bestsellers. Well here's a book that still deserves to be a bestseller, year after year (even more so than Anne Lamott's tome!): Page After Page by Heather Sellers. (We also published a follow-up, Chapter After Chapter, which some people say is even better!) Fortunately, readers are still discovering this gem every day; here's one example: The more I read of it, the more I love it and want to give Heather
Sellers a really big hug. Over lunch I read her take on people who are
always saying "I'm so busy! I'm so stressed! I have so much to do!" I
work with people like this. They drive me crazy. I worked out a while
back and everyone is busy.
It's ridiculous to tell people that you're busy. We know you are,
because we are too. A Heather says - we all get 24 hours in a day, how
are you going to use yours? She also wrote a whole bunch about treating
writing like a lover instead of a mistress (or whatever the word is for
women who have another dude on the side) and giving it attention and
love and dreaming about it. Anyway, I love this book. I am reading it
in small doses, digesting and completing exercises.
Click here to visit the writer's blog. Craft & Technique | General
8/14/2008 6:21:30 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) Trackback
|
|
|
|