# Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Monthly News from Glimmer Train
Posted by Jane

logo01.jpg Glimmer Train just announced the winners of their August Very Short Fiction Award competition. The first- and second-place winners will be published in an upcoming issue of Glimmer Train Stories.
 
First place ($1,200)
Michael Schiavone (Gloucester, MA)
“No One Comes Here By Accident"
 
Second place ($500)
Jackie Thomas-Kennedy (Charlottesville, VA)
“The Bridge Is Moving"
 
Third place ($300)
Debbie Weingarten (Tucson, AZ)
“Precarious Things"


A PDF of the Top 25 winners can be found here.
This twice yearly competition is open to all writers for stories on any theme with a word count range of 500-3,000. Submissions may be sent for the November Short Story Award for New Writers using the Glimmer Train online submissions system at www.glimmertrain.org.

Also: Family Matters contest (Deadline: October 31)
Glimmer Train hosts this contest four times a year, and first place is $1,200 plus publication in the journal. It’s open to all writers for stories about family, with a word count range of 500-12,000. Click here for complete guidelines.
 

If you didn't know, Writer's Digest partnered with Glimmer Train to publish two compilation volumes of the best stuff from their Writers Ask newsletter. Be sure to check them out.
 



General | Industry News & Trends
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:42:37 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
# Monday, October 27, 2008
101 Reasons to Stop Writing
Posted by Jane

I recently stumbled upon 101 Reasons to Stop Writing while surfing the writing blogosphere. I love it.






Fun
Bookmark and Share
Monday, October 27, 2008 12:32:52 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
Northwest Ohio Writers Conference
Posted by Jane

This past weekend, I spoke about the art of query letters at the Northwest Ohio Writers Conference. Download my query letter handout as a PDF: NovelQuery.pdf (80.05 KB)

Conferences/Events | Getting Published
Bookmark and Share
Monday, October 27, 2008 12:27:05 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
# Friday, October 24, 2008
Agents & Editors: What Has Changed About the Submissions Process?
Posted by Jane



At Writer’s Digest Books, we’re in the process of updating our popular title Formatting & Submitting Your Manuscript and are looking for insight from agents/editors on how the industry is changing. Here are a few things we’re interested in knowing.
  1. How have queries and submissions changed for you in recent years? Do you request different information? Do you accept email queries? If so, do you prefer electronic or paper queries? How important is format and formality in electronic communication?
  2. What are your pet peeves and turnoffs?
  3. What are your do's and don'ts for writers?
  4. Have you changed how you select authors? How many of your authors are found through queries, and how many through other means? Do you want to hear about an author's platform?
  5. What recent changes in your market do you want writers to know about?
Writers are also welcome to comment and offer tips.

Click here to e-mail me directly!

Agents | Getting Published | New Titles From F+W
Bookmark and Share
Friday, October 24, 2008 4:38:12 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2] Trackback
# Thursday, October 23, 2008
On Being Skipped (or: How Your Book Gets Sold Into Bookstores)
Posted by Jane

There's a blog offering the best explanation ever of how your book gets sold into bookstore chains, by the marketing manager at John Wiley & Sons. Here's a brief snippet:
But bookstores are businesses, not public conveniences. No store has the responsibility to carry every book published -- although, to be honest, that's a straw-man argument, since no one is asking for that. (They're just wishing that their books, the books they like, and the books by their friends be spared the chopping block.) I market books for a living, so I can tell you an unpleasant truth: the order for any book, from any account, starts at zero. The publisher's sales rep walks in the door with tipsheets and covers, past sales figures and promotional plans, to convince that bookseller's buyer to buy that book. In many categories -- SFF is still one of them -- the chain buyers say "yes" the overwhelming majority of the time. But not all the time. Sometimes, that buyer is not convinced, and the order stays at zero.


Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Marketing & Self-Promotion
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, October 23, 2008 4:15:21 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
Writer's Digest Subscribers vs. Newsstand Buyers
Posted by Jane

Everyone has offered such wonderful comments on the magazine covers that I wanted to share/review some of them:

Mary Ulrich comments:
I would think you have two audiences, the subscribers and the people who will buy WD off the shelves.  The first sample has more of the "Entertainment tonight" appeal and might hook the McGafferty fans to an impulse purchase. As a subscriber I like number 2 or 3 because I am most interested in the "craft" articles and like a creative drawing. …

In the Dec. issue of WD, in the small print on the bottom of page 2, it says that WD is "a bimonthly publication".  Last issue I was confused to receive the December issue at the beginning of October. So WD is published bimonthly, 6 X a year, or quarterly?


First, to answer Mary's question: WD magazine is published 6x/year. I'm not sure why, up until this point, we haven't clarified this by labeling the cover with "November/December", "January/February" and so on. Something for me to research!

But to get to the real point: Mary hits on a perplexing issue that Writer's Digest magazine faces: the difference between what would be appealing to many of our subscribers (usually more advanced writers) and people who buy the magazine off newsstand—the type of person we usually label as the "aspiring writer" or the "dreamer," though all great writers are dreamers (even still aspiring) to some extent.

WD's circulation department has sales information that supports using an author photo on the cover because photos perform better than illustrations on the newsstand. Of course, what subscribers would prefer is a gray area, but based on the small sampling of comments here, it does appear that people who have read the magazine for a while tend to favor the illustrated cover.

However, it's hard to overlook the truth behind these comments:
A writer on the cover makes me connect as opposed to some abstract art. (PatriciaW)

The picture on the front cover of real people who struggled to write and enjoyed every bit of their struggle, touches my heart most and gives me the motivation I need as an aspiring writer. Their success to be featured on the cover speaks more words than any art could reflect. Art and cartoon could work for specific topics inside the magazine, but real people appeal more to the majority of would be writers. (Amina)

The first one absolutely caught me. I didn't know who Megan McCafferty was, but it didn't matter to me, as the "Write Your Novel in 2009" was much the clearest on that page, and that was what grabbed me. (Deb)

I generally tend to believe that writers who buy off newsstand are initially pulled in by the photo (they connect with the human face -- this is probably subconscious -- even if they don't recognize the face), but don't buy the issue unless the cover lines really deliver on a benefit or dream the writer has -- in this case, to write a novel.

As for subscribers, I can only hope they continue to renew because of great content, and generally overlook covers meant to appeal to newsstand buyers?

It's a big challenge for us to tackle in 2009 and beyond.


WD Magazine
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:01:27 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0] Trackback
# Wednesday, October 22, 2008
How the Economy Affects the Dreams of Writers
Posted by Jane

Earlier this week, our team discussed the soon-to-be-relaunched (and incredibly improved) WritersMarket.com. Because we'll have so much more value to offer (e.g., all listings from the niche Market Books, like Poet's, Novel & Short Story, and Children's Writer's), we need to implement new subscription models and pricing.

As part of this meeting, our WritersMarket.com customer service rep extraordinaire, Nancy Parish, offered some fascinating statistics from the past few months:
  • In August, 4.8% of subscribers who canceled said they couldn’t afford the service.
  • In September, 2% of subscribers who canceled said they couldn't afford it.
  • In October, 29% of subscribers who canceled said they couldn't afford it!
Definitely points to the strange things happening in our econonmy these days, though the common wisdom about the Writer's Digest business has always been: When times are tough, people still hold onto their writing dreams, and even look to writing to hopefully provide extra income.

I'm wondering if this is really true: Does writing still stay front and center in our lives during good times and bad? Do we look to it as refuge AND rescue?



Industry News & Trends
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:54:11 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3] Trackback
# Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Which Writer's Digest Magazine Would You Buy?
Posted by Jane

We're putting the finishing touches on the January/February 2009 issue of Writer's Digest, and have four very different options for the cover.

Which one do you like best?
And which featured story looks most exciting to you?


WD-1.jpg

WD-2.jpg

WD-3.jpg

WD-4.jpg


WD Magazine
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:09:27 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [18] Trackback
# Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Help Us Name Our 2009 Writing Event
Posted by Jane

I've been working with the F+W events division to concept a new writing conference in 2009 that will focus on helping writers/authors get their work published, marketed, promoted—and ultimately sold—in an industry that's changing by the day. At this conference, we plan on offering educational sessions that will be helpful to both traditionally published authors as well as self-published authors, since the work required on the front-end AND the back-end is becoming much the same. (For example, F+W no longer has a traditional publicity or marketing department, and no publicists.)

The WD staff is split down the middle when it comes to the following options. Which one appeals to you, and why? Do you have an even better idea? Send me your feedback, or leave a comment.

Writer's Digest University: New Approaches to the Business of Authorship
People seem to like this one because it's short, snappy, and the main title (Writer's Digest University) can be used for many types of events, should we choose to launch more.

Writer's Digest Publishing University: New Approaches to the Business of Authorship
Others like adding the word "Publishing" in the key title since, without it, the conference could be construed as very craft-oriented, plus "publishing" is a big objective for most writers.

Other favored subtitles included:
  • New Approaches [or Paths?] to Successful Publishing
  • New Approaches [or Paths?] to Successful Authorship
There doesn't seem to be any agreement on whether "authorship" is a word that will catch the attention of writers/authors, and there's not a clear favorite between "paths" and "approaches."

As for myself, I think the word "business" seems a little frightening for someone who's new to the industry, but maybe this conference is really suited for the person who already understands that it takes a business mindset to be successful as an author, and is ready to get to work.

Thoughts?


Conferences/Events
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:34:24 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [7] Trackback
# Monday, October 06, 2008
The Learning Curve That Comes With New Media
Posted by Jane

This video is being spread among F+W staff today. Brilliant.




Digitization & New Technology | Fun
Bookmark and Share
Monday, October 06, 2008 10:28:18 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3] Trackback


Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links