|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| March, 2010 (10) |
| February, 2010 (20) |
| January, 2010 (15) |
| December, 2009 (16) |
| November, 2009 (13) |
| October, 2009 (18) |
| September, 2009 (22) |
| August, 2009 (15) |
| July, 2009 (22) |
| June, 2009 (19) |
| May, 2009 (18) |
| April, 2009 (25) |
| March, 2009 (19) |
| February, 2009 (21) |
| January, 2009 (18) |
| December, 2008 (3) |
| November, 2008 (12) |
| October, 2008 (13) |
| September, 2008 (24) |
| August, 2008 (27) |
| July, 2008 (26) |
| June, 2008 (34) |
| May, 2008 (36) |
| April, 2008 (2) |
|
Search
Archives
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Sunday, November 29, 2009
Best Tweets for Writers (week ending 11/27/09)
Posted by Jane
I watch Twitter, so you don't have to. Visit each Sunday
for the week's best Tweets. If I missed a great Tweet, leave it in the Comments. Always
welcome your suggestions on improving this weekly feature.
Best of Best
Don't Put All Your Eggs in One Basket By Writing Only One Book @EelKat [linking to Writer's Digest]
Writers Need Social Media… and Social Media Needs Writers @thecreativepenn
Stand Alone
I actually find writing process interesting…but not in a query letter. @EpsteinLiterary
Getting Published, Agents/Editors
Book pitch lines that DON'T work, from lit agent @bookendsjessica @inkyelbows
You know what you're writing about when you can summarize your story in 1-2 sentences (via @fictioncity) @inkyelbows
Archives: Should I send a revision to agents looking at my work? @Kid_Lit
A thoughtful post on “What Do Agents REALLY Offer Writers?” from @JodyHedlund. Very valid points @MichaelHyatt
Craft & Technique
Working through character & plot problems in your novel by @LKHamilton via @kimidreams @mystorywriter
Excellent, succinct, multi-part series about how to begin a novel, by @anitanolan @inkyelbows
How to reveal character through the dialogue you write @benwhiting
Biggest mistake made by 1st-time memoir writers: Being too general, not enough of yourself in the story. @inkyelbows
Publishing Biz, Trends, Future of Publishing
Why Writers Should Say No to Writer Mills and Yes to Free @BubbleCow
Earning out an advance vs. profit for publishers via @moonrat @thecreativepenn
The publishing economics of a bestseller @NathanBransford
Bold prediction: Joe Wikert thinks Amazon will exit Kindle business within 3 years @victoriastrauss
7 reasons e-book readers make lousy gifts this year. We're on brink of radical change in how read e-books (SFChron) @draccah
The Top 10 myths about e-books @NathanBransford
Twitter, Blogs & Social MediaThe importance of compelling copy for your website [the site should not be about you] @ElizabethSCraig
How to get a book deal, part 1: Print platform vs blog platform @ElizabethSCraig
How To Feature On The Most Influential Websites In The World - For Writers @thecreativepenn
Self-Publishing
Quick Note on Self-Publishing: Don't Pay! via @scalzi @thecreativepenn
Why Do Fiction Publishers Get So Uptight About Self-Publishing? @selfpubreview
Automatically Format Your Book Professionally In Word @tonyeldridge
Marketing and Promotion
9 tips for successful author readings, from Alan Rinzler @inkyelbows
Resources/Tools100 Free Lectures That Will Make You a Better Writer @namenick
The Writing Life33 Rules of Persistence: Tips to Reach Your Goals @ElizabethSCraig
New research proves, once and for all, happy writers are lousy writers via @GOOD @Joelwillans @mystorywriter
Linking to Writer's Digest7 Reasons Agents Stop Reading Your First Chapter - by @lkblackburne @inkyelbows
If you think your work has a problem, then it probably does - & it's NOT ready to send out to an agent @inkyelbows
Breaking into literary fiction category: lit. agent Alex Glass advises getting credentials first @inkyelbows
Looking for more?
- Join our online community, kind of like Facebook for writers
(2,000 members and growing)
Best of Twitter
Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:41:18 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Wednesday, November 25, 2009
The 3 Self-Publishing Paths You Should Understand
Posted by Jane

Since Monday's post, a few writers have been informing me that self-publishing ought to be free, or close to it. To underscore their point, they point to services like Lulu (no upfront cost for uploading and selling an e-book if it's completely ready to go), or Lightning Source, which the traditional publishing industry often uses for print-on-demand books.
Yes, those are wonderful services anyone can use, and I encourage writers to look into them. They're basically turnkey services/tools. They do not assist in what is normally more confusing for the average person: creating and designing print-ready or online-ready files, and in some cases, distribution/fulfillment and eCommerce.
Here are the 3 major paths to consider.
Do It All Yourself
Upfront cost: $0 if the book is digital only; around $100 set-up fee if you contract with a print-on-demand printer like Lightning Source for physical copies, plus production/unit cost when you order physical books
You keep: All money earned off the sale of each book if you sell direct off your own website, or in-person at events
Requirements: Know how to prepare book files (cover and interior)—preferably with industry-standard programs like InDesign and Illustrator, but Word works in a pinch. Ability to create PDFs. Ability to create and re-size images.
Risks: Incorrect file formatting, poor book design (unless you contract it out), no shipping/fulfillment support for physical product, non-standard elements/layout
Who this option works best for: Writers comfortable with computers and technology; writers with an entrepreneurial spirit
Do It Yourself + Retail/Distribution Partners
Upfront cost: Same as Do It Yourself
You keep: A pre-determined percentage of the book's retail price. When a customer makes a purchase, your retail/distribution partner takes its cut before passing on the rest to you. Popular partners: Lulu, Amazon DTP, Scribd, Smashwords
Requirements: Same as above; retail/distribution partners often ask for very specific file formatting, so be prepared to adapt/edit files as needed. For print-on-demand retail partners like Lulu, there is often a set-up fee.
Risks: Sometimes it takes a long time to get paid by these retail/distribution partners. For e-books, it can be difficult to format just perfectly so that it displays correctly no matter what reading device is being used.
Who this option works best for: People who don't want to mess with e-retailing/fulfillment on their own site, and/or see a benefit to their book being distributed across the biggest online retail stores.
Before I move onto the next option, clearly you can see it's possible to self-publish for next to nothing, if you feel you don't need any assistance whatsoever.
When people do need assistance, it's usually with:
- Cover design (front/back—and spine if not digital)
- Interior design and layout
- Image preparation (resolution and reproduction quality)
- Back cover copy & other marketing copy
- Copyediting, proofreading, indexing
- ISBN / barcodes (see note below)
- Library of Congress & copyright registration
- eCommerce setup (if selling off your own site)
- Fulfillment/shipping of orders (whether digital or print)
Starting to sound like a small business, isn't it?
But these are all things you can manage on your own if you have a bit of tech savvy, and decent software. While I don't consider it rocket science, some writers would rather pay someone else to figure it out. You can pay a private consultant to help you, or you can pay a service to help you. And so we come to the 3rd path.
Pay Someone Else to Do It (e.g., Author Solutions)
Note: This route makes the most sense when you are absolutely sure you need & want physical copies of your book. Otherwise, there's not much point.
Upfront cost: Widely varies, since each service offers many packages and tiers, but anywhere from several hundred dollars to thousands. You can also buy just the services you need a la carte.
You keep: A royalty on sales. This royalty will be better than a traditional publishing deal, but much less than what you'd earn with a straight-up retail partner or turnkey service like Lulu.
Requirements: You hand over the Word document, they take care of the rest.
Risks: The more service you want, the more you pay. At its simplest level, you're paying a service to do what a traditional publisher would do, but if you want the editing and development a traditional publisher would provide, you have to pay extra for it (or have it done yourself before you approach them). They also cannot sell physical copies of your book into bricks-and-mortar bookstores, no matter how much you are willing to pay. (But your book will be available to order from any bookstore as long as it's listed in Ingram.)
As with all services you pay for, know the value of what you're paying for, and make sure you're not paying for stuff you don't need—or that you could easily manage or contract out yourself.
Who this option works best for: Low-tech writers, as well as writers who don't mind paying someone else to manage/execute the project—while giving up a chunk of future earnings should the book sell well. (Giving up future earnings can be avoided if you hire an independent publishing consultant rather than a publishing service like Author Solutions.)
A few online tools to know about
Here are a couple sites offering lots of good information and resources:
- Self-Publishing Review.
- Publetariat & Indie Author. These sites are both by April Hamilton, who shows you the financial breakdown of using some of the turnkey services mentioned above, and also offers technical advice on the design and preparation of files.
Also, from Writer's Digest:
For those who have self-published, using any of the methods above, I
hope you'll share any tips or resources that have been helpful for you in the comments.
Photo credit: 'Lil
Self-Publishing
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 1:21:21 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, November 23, 2009
Harlequin's Self-Publishing Venture: Is It the Future of Publishing?
Posted by Jane

As I observed the writing community's reaction to Harlequin Horizons last week, I felt incredible sympathy for the people at Harlequin. It appears they've been blind-sided by vitriolic outrage from all sides—unpublished writers, published authors, writers organizations, industry professionals.
For those who aren't familiar with the story yet, Harlequin announced a partnership with AuthorSolutions to create a self-publishing arm (or vanity publishing arm, depending on who you ask) called Harlequin Horizons. You can get a good feel for the story, and the gnashing of teeth (particularly in the comments!), on these blogs:
Dear Author: Malle Vallik, Harlequin's Digital Director, Answers Questions on Harlequin Horizons
Jackie Kessler: Harlequin Horizons Versus RWA
Janet Reid (Agent): C'mon Harlequin, Don't Try to Blow Smoke
Rachelle Gardner (Agent): Self-Publishing Rant
Scalzi: Writers Organizations to Harlequin: If You're Not Going to Act Like a Real Publisher, We're Not Going to Treat You Like One
The situation is still unfolding, but the Romance Writers of America have stated they are removing Harlequin from their list of recognized publishers, and other writers organizations may follow suit.
Frankly, I was caught blind-sided too. When Thomas Nelson announced pretty much the exact same venture with Author Solutions several weeks ago (called West Bow), I was expecting an uproar.
But in comparison to what's happening now, with Harlequin, you could say the response to Thomas Nelson was benevolent resignation. I'm still waiting for someone to logically explain to me why the two situations are different from each other (while not, in the process, denigrating Christian writers or the Christian market).
Harlequin's move has been called sleazy, unethical, fraudulent, greedy, and predatory. When they responded to the public outcry, and to the RWA specifically, part of their statement read:
It is disappointing that the RWA has not recognized that publishing models have and will continue to change. As a leading publisher of women's fiction in a rapidly changing environment, Harlequin's intention is to provide authors access to all publishing opportunities, traditional or otherwise.
People aren't having it. I think it made everyone even more angry.
I've been thinking about this issue since Friday. I go to bed thinking about it, I wake up thinking about it. I drive around thinking about it.
And I finally realized today why.
This move touches the deepest roots of what people believe traditional publishing is—and what it has been.
Harlequin's move is not shallow.
It is either progressive (even if some say executed poorly), or a path to ruin. How you interpret it depends on what you believe publishing fundamentally is, and how you can envision it or permit it to change.
It should be no secret to anyone that publishing today is undergoing immense transformation. But many writers don't see or understand what that means for them or how that change will manifest itself in a way that affects them.
In my time in the industry, I've always seen Harlequin as a progressive and innovative company. I don't think that has changed. But this latest move fundamentally questions what it means to be a publisher. And it's a fascinating question.
No doubt Harlequin leadership has read and considered what publishing futurist Mike Shatzkin has commented on many times. Here's a snippet from a blog post he wrote in June 2009:
At a conference on “Giving It Away” in Toronto at which I spoke two weeks ago, Carolyn Pittis of HarperCollins was explicit that the publisher buying content and making money by selling it was “one model”, and she pointed out that there is a “fee for services” model as well. The inference I drew was “that’s not what we’re doing today, but every option is on the table for tomorrow.” Why not? Don’t we have to believe that one of the exit strategies for the investors in Author Solutions, the biggest rollup of self-publishing service companies, might be to sell to one of the Big Six who, despairing of the future of their publishing model, tries to buy their way into a new one? …
A friend of mine in the financial business wrote a book 20 years ago and wanted to get an agent to sell it. He knew the advance would be low, but he also knew the book would add credibility to his business. He wanted it sold. An agent told him that the agency only handled books on which they thought the advance would be $25,000 or more, yielding a commission of $3,750 at the normal 15%. This friend told the agent, take the first $3,750. The agent took the book, sold it for $6,000, and everybody was happy. This kind of arrangement, as well as others where the agent actually charges a fee for helping an author manage self-publishing options, are going to have to become more common in the future. Let’s not be too judgmental about the pioneering agents who change the paradigm.
(my emphasis)
Harlequin is clearly at an advanced stage of considering how it will evolve—or devolve, considering on your perspective. But most writers and writers organizations (and publishers) have NOT grappled with these questions yet. Publishing has often been slowest to change and adapt of all industries.
Some argue Harlequin should've been better prepared and planned more strategically to respond to the criticisms that would arise. But when you've already moved on, like Harlequin—and are seeking solutions—it's tough to backtrack to the mindset of those people who are stunned, angry, and indignant, and can't even conceive of adaptation.
Harlequin has been brave to take this step. Some would say brave and immensely stupid, but let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Let's assume these people whom we thought so well of just a month ago, and praised to the hills (see Carina Press), haven't become evil minions and thoughtless corporate grunts overnight.
That's the big picture that concerns me most. You can stop reading here, because it's the most important part of what I wanted to say.
For those who want to read on, I'll address the lower-level concerns that have sparked the majority of criticisms now levied against Harlequin Horizons.
"Horizons is NOT a self-publishing option. It's a VANITY publishing option."
This argument wants to differentiate between authors who pay a publishing service (e.g., Author Solutions) to produce a book, versus those who are truly DIY or independent and do not use any kind of middleman to produce the book.
I find this argument elitist, but it's still meaningful, for 3 key reasons:
1. If you contract with a publishing service like Author Solutions, aside from charging you an upfront fee (and we could argue all day whether the fees are exorbitant), they're also going to take a huge chunk of your royalties.
2. Despite what the marketing messages say, with a publishing service, you give up some control and uniqueness of product, depending on the service you're working with—or you have to pay extra fees to have the control/uniqueness you want.
3. You might sign a service contract you don't understand, or it could lock you into things that you regret later. (I tell writers to never sign contracts they don't fully understand, to make sure they are keeping all rights, and to have a straightforward way to terminate the contract.)
Writers who are truly independent in their self-publishing venture—at least when it concerns a physical product—often put out a better quality product. It's because they have a bigger investment on the line, and usually a stronger entrepreneurial spirit.
But let's face it. Not all writers/authors are entrepreneurs or do-it-yourselfers. The world of publishing is not something most people consider accessible. I've advised two former Procter & Gamble executives, who are masters of business. Why? When it came time for them to consider self-publishing, their first step was to find a consultant to sort through the mess and make sure they didn't make any mistakes—and remove the guesswork.
This is the boat most people are in. They need help. And publishing services are the first place that people stumble upon (have you done a Google search lately on "get published"?).
I can already hear you proclaiming, "If writers aren't dedicated and motivated enough to self-publish properly, then they shouldn't do it."
Or: "People should sweat and toil until finally their work is good enough to get accepted by a publisher." (That wait might last until the grave, considering how dramatically publishers are cutting their lists and acting more risk-averse than ever.)
I'd rather tell writers: Go ahead and do it, eyes wide open, and pay the fees, but don't complain that your book's not selling or it's not in stores (or insert common gripe here), because you didn't take the time to understand the value proposition of using a publishing service (which in some cases is arguably zero).
And, as Guy Gonzalez is fond of saying about all forms of self-publishing, it's a business decision. Let's take the moralizing out of it. There is a market demand for these services, which have made thousands of people very happy and satisfied. Which brings me to the next criticism of Horizons.
"The Horizon fees and/or royalty rates are exorbitant/predatory."
Horizons' deal is no better or worse than what you'd find with another publishing service. Undoubtedly the fees and rates are what the market can bear, optimized for volume, overhead, and profit.
Whenever you ask a middleman to do the work for you, you expect to pay more. Your savings comes from using your time, energy, and resource to do other things. Writers may be unable or unwilling to do the work required to "truly" self-publish, so it's their decision to make if it's worth the added expense to have someone else do the work.
We make these decisions everyday. Do I hire a financial advisor? Do I use a real estate agent? Do I hire a cleaning service? Do I buy the cut, washed veggies in a nice tray from Kroger, or do I go to the local market and spend half the money?
And the big daddy of criticisms: "Harlequin is underhandedly and greedily profiting off its slush pile by referring unsuspecting writers to its self-publishing arm."
A few points to make here:
1. For any other company with an ancillary service to offer, this move would be considered smart marketing. In the writing world, this is considered predatory, unethical, and possibly fraudulent. I'm pretty sure it's not fraud, but I am sympathetic to claims that this could mislead writers in all kinds of ways (which is why clarity is needed—see discussion below about what could be better).
However, I doubt writers will only submit and only be rejected by Harlequin in their lifetimes, and I doubt Harlequin's mention of the self-publishing option will be revelatory and ground-breaking information. It would take a very sheltered writer to submit only to Harlequin, get rejected, consider her traditional publishing journey at an end, and immediately run to Horizons to take advantage of a tremendous opportunity.
2. A wide swath of writing community has always been averse to any entity (including Writer's Digest) profiting off of writers' dreams. It's almost a cliche at this point. But it's a strange criticism—as if writers' own artistic endeavors were meant to extract NO money!—and often it is writers/authors who (rightly so) yell loudest when they think their work is not being properly valued or paid for.
3. Ninety-nine percent of writers don't get their work published traditionally. This doesn't mean writers should self-publish or stop their efforts to get published & paid, but publishing services know that most writers are frustrated, disappointed, and want to get published anyway, even if they have to pay, even if they're not getting edited, even if it's a dead-end. Harlequin is mentioning an option nearly all writers have been confronted with, or will be confronted with.
The big and most interesting question for me Is it possible, in the future, that a Horizons author could end up bringing in more revenue or more profit than a traditional Harlequin author? If so, I think it shows you just how much traditional publishing is broken. (I leave it to the reader to decide if this is the kind of change to pursue.)
OR: What if the revenue/profit from Horizons made it possible for Harlequin to better support its entire business, and they were able to do a better job with traditional authors? It appears to me Harlequin is setting up as many different tracks as possible for a potential author: traditional (for the very best, with most commercial promise), Carina Press (digital only, for almost-theres, or to test-market), and pay-to-play (Horizons). Why shouldn't Harlequin try to get some of the huge piles of money being spent on self-publishing to keep its traditional business going?
They are a business, and be as cynical as you like about their motives, but if it keeps editors and other talented people in jobs, I'm in favor of it.
What could be better (whether Horizons-related or not) The marketing copy and description of any publishing service should be crystal clear about what the service CAN and CANNOT accomplish. Publishing services have a lot of feel-good language about achieving dreams/goals, and aren't upfront about the reality of how well self-published books perform, or what the "distribution" or "marketing" packages really mean or can really be valued at. Usually these are packages to be strictly avoided, or independently contracted.
A writer who conducts even the smallest bit of due diligence (e.g., via Writer Beware) will understand the significant limitations of these services. They should not be considered a stepping stone to traditional publishing success. It's just as hard to get traditionally published as before.
Yet I disagree with those who argue Horizons would actually HURT a writer's chances of future traditional publication. If you have a great follow-up manuscript that has tremendous commercial appeal, you WILL get takers no matter the results of your self-pub effort—which frankly will be expected to fail. (That's why publishing services have to make their money upfront, not off book sales.)
But Horizons and other services are not HELPING you either, unless you use it to build an audience, test-market, or otherwise market/promote to some level of awareness/success. Many of these same goals can be achieved by using free digital services like Lulu, Smashwords, Amazon DTP, Scribd, and others. You don't need a physical or POD product to effectively self-publish, which is why I recommend writers use FREE methods before spending a dime.
--
This post might be the longest I've ever written—but appropriately so. This issue touches the heart of what publishing is—though I've probably just slathered myself with honey and stuck my hand in a dozen hornet's nests.
People like to say (and I've said too) that money should flow TO the writer, not AWAY from the writer.
But I can see a business model emerging where publishers work with authors in more diverse ways. What we've held to be sacred—that a writer should NEVER pay to publish—may change. Writers may pay agents, they may pay publishers. And it may turn out to be an accepted and ethical practice if done with transparency, honesty, and in the spirit of mutual benefit.
I'm not saying that Harlequin has got it right, at least not out of the gate. But it's an important step. I predict other publishers will follow, and the model will be improved and made more attractive. Just wait.
Photo credit: CJ and Dan
Digitization & New Technology | Getting Published | Industry News & Trends | Self-Publishing
Monday, November 23, 2009 4:32:34 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Sunday, November 22, 2009
Best Tweets for Writers (week ending 11/20/09)
Posted by Jane
I watch Twitter, so you don't have to. Visit each Sunday
for the week's best Tweets. If I missed a great Tweet, leave it in the Comments. Always
welcome your suggestions on improving this weekly feature.
Best of Best
4 mistakes commonly made by beginning writers (by Caro Clarke)
@inkyelbows
24 Agents Looking for New Writers @WritersDigest
50 Things a Writer Shouldn't Do @mystorywriter
AWESOME article: The Most Powerful Two Hours You’ll Ever Spend as a Storyteller @merylkevans
Stand Alone
Thanks for important reminder! (from @KimsCraftBlog): Story ideas can't be copyrighted. You have to write it first. @merylkevans
Writers are artists. authors are businesspeople. or they should be. @booksquare
If you don't tell me where your last book was published, I am going to assume it was self published AND you are trying to trick me. @bostonbookgirl
Self-publishing is a business decision, not an artistic or political statement. Can we move on now? @glecharles
SECRET #pubtip: If you talk to me on twitter and I know (recognize) you, I'll pay more attention to your query @WolfsonLiterary
Queries with "So + so suggested I contact you" but I have no idea who so + so is. Don't do that. @WolfsonLiterary
If your query is 3/4 about you and only 1/4 about your novel, you're doing it wrong. @agentgame
Decide what emotion you want reader to feel in scene/chapter & focus emotional arc to achieve that. @DocumentDriven
Saying it again- you have little control over how your finished book will appear (size, paper, etc.). It does not belong in a query. @KatelynnLacopo
Authors: Twitter is a great tool. But don't neglect "old-school" internet—not all readers are on Twitter. 1st stop is a website. @papertyger
If nobody is requesting partials from your query, rework your query. Perhaps your book isn't coming across as strong as you'd like. @WolfsonLiterary
If you can't write a good query, you either don't know how to sell your book, or you need to write better one. @RachelleGardner
With nonfiction queries, after I get the idea I scan for your credentials. If they aren't there, I decline. @bostonbookgirl
Regarding self-pub, would prefer to see that you are querying with a new manuscript, but still would like to see sales numbers on last one. @WolfsonLiterary
Leave out "this is my first novel" in a query (at least to me). I prefer to think you have written one or two practice novels first. @bostonbookgirl
Getting Published, Agents/Editors
Rachelle Gardner on some bad advice about agents floating around the Internet @NathanBransford
Stop worrying about "all those awful books being published." Advice from lit agent @RachelleGardner @inkyelbows
What do agents look for? Great writers and great professionals @motsjustes
My Least Favorite Plots @tordotcom
When is a manuscript finished? When to query? My take @Kid_Lit
The Synopsis: what is is, what it isn't & how to write it
by Caro Clarke
@inkyelbows
Craft & Technique
Are how-to-write books worth anything? @jamesscottbell
Stupid Writer Tricks: 10 Writing Tricks to Avoid by @davidledelman @missdaisyfrost
10 words you don't want an editor to think when they read your manuscript @ElizabethSCraig
8 Secrets to Creating Emotion in Your Novel @jtlongandco
Top 7 reasons readers stop reading @ElizabethSCraig
How to avoid boring readers with 1st person POV by @jamesscottbell @benwhiting
11 ways to create suspense in your story by Gail Carson Levine @inkyelbows
Character creation tip via @p2p_editor: Do your characters' flaws work on more than one level? @inkyelbows
How much descriptive detail is too much? Gail Carson Levine offers tips
@inkyelbows
Publishing Biz, Trends, Future of Publishing
Writers: Here's an explanation of sell-in, sell-through, and earn out @RachelleGardner
Twitter, Blogs & Social MediaWriters who tweet for book deals: Another good piece from @LydiaBreakfast @milehighfool
Blog posts now have a longer life span and travel further thanks to social networks. @rww
Knowing if your social media is worth it. New post from @lizallen @AndreaJarrell
Marketing and Promotion
How to Plan a Blog Tour @Le_Shack
Resources/ToolsAuthors keep asking me, "where do I find free stock photos." Here are the top 12 free stock photo sites @AuthorTech
The Writing LifeAre Writers Born or Made? @GalleyCat
Fascinating post by @gwenbell about how to create your personal manifesto @gretchenrubin
From Writer's DigestMitch Albom: The Keys to a Memoir (and a prompt) from @WritersDigest @mystorywriter
10 Ways for Writers to Use Twitter Effectively @robertleebrewer
Looking for more?
- Join our online community, kind of like Facebook for writers
(1,500 members and growing)
Best of Twitter
Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:44:04 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Glimmer Train Monthly News
Posted by Jane

Glimmer Train has just chosen the winning stories for their September Fiction Open competition. This competition is held quarterly and is open to all writers for stories with a word count range between 2000-20,000. No theme restrictions. The next Fiction Open competition will take place in December. Glimmer Train’s monthly submission calendar may be viewed here.
First place: Carrie Brown (pictured above) of Sweet Briar, VA, wins $2000 for “Bomb.” Her story will be published in the Fall 2010 issue of Glimmer Train Stories, out in August 2010.
Second place: Ken Barris of Cape Town, South Africa, wins $1000 for “Life Underwater.” His story will also be published in an upcoming issue of Glimmer Train Stories. Third place: Lydia Fitzpatrick of Brooklyn NY, wins $600 for “Ellijay.”
A PDF of the Top 25 winners can be found here. Glimmer Train has also selected the 50 winning entries for their Best Start competition. Each wins $50 and makes Glimmer Train’s Best Start list. Deadline soon approaching! November Short Story Award for New Writers: November 30
This competition is held quarterly and is open to writers whose fiction has not appeared in a print publication with a circulation over 5,000. No theme restrictions. Word count should not exceed 12,000. (All shorter lengths welcome.) Click here for complete guidelines. --
If
you didn't know, Writer's Digest partnered with Glimmer Train to
publish two compilation volumes of the best stuff from their Writers Ask newsletter.
Be sure to check them out.

General
Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:51:52 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Sunday, November 15, 2009
Best Tweets for Writers (week ending 11/13/09)
Posted by Jane
I watch Twitter, so you don't have to. Visit each Sunday
for the week's best Tweets. If I missed a great Tweet, leave it in the Comments. Always
welcome your suggestions on improving this weekly feature.
Best of Best
Great post from an agent about why books are rejected @BubbleCow
@RachelleGardner on when/how a book becomes profitable. Best thing I've read all week. @ChuckSambuchino
3 Common Mistakes an editor is seeing in manuscripts @ElizabethSCraig
Great post about what an agent looks for in a query letter @BubbleCow
Annie Dillard's take-no-prisoners approach to writing (via @ContraryMag @catchingdays) @DebraMarrs
Problem: Query letters have a lack of conflict @inkyelbows
Stand Alone
Poets: build audience online and via live performances. Digitize everything, and think beyond text. Print = archive/souvenir/premium. @glecharles
Nothing against the book, but too many poets see it as end game. Solo poetry books don't sell; think bigger. @glecharles
Poets should be all over digital publishing: eChapbooks, podcasts, video, Kinetic Typography. Save "the book" for when you're dead. @glecharles
If you want to know what you get done in a day, log not only your writing, but your procrastination tools, too. Amazing. @Vanessaftw
Don't query me right after finishing the 1st draft of your novel. Or, you know, don't tell me that in your query. @Ginger_Clark
Yes, it's true we [agents] Google you to see who you are. If you say you have a web presence, please provide specific URLs. @sjaejones
Don't TELL me your ms is thrilling, suspenseful, and the absolute best. SHOW me within the query. @MarleneStriner
Writers: Pretty much anything you do to get our attn in your query, besides a terrific blurb, is wasted effort. @rachellegardner
Wasn't one of the ten commandments, "Thy e-mail font size shall be 10 or 12?" No? Moses, seriously, get on it. @NathanBransford
Fiction = good. Novel = good. "Fiction novel" = redundant. @NathanBransford
Best of Twitter
Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:41:15 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Sunday, November 08, 2009
Best Tweets for Writers (week ending 11/6/09)
Posted by Jane
I watch Twitter, so you don't have to. Visit each Sunday
for the week's best Tweets. If I missed a great Tweet, leave it in the Comments. Always
welcome your suggestions on improving this weekly feature.
Best of Best
3 Questions To Better Understand Your Novel @FictionMatters
3 Storytelling Exercises That Can Get You Published
@BubbleCow
Writing the perfect scene by Randy Ingermanson.
Thought-provoking article.
@mystorywriter
Stand Alone
Dear Querier, an agent is not going to steal your idea. In fact the only way to market your book is to share it. @mattwagner
Fiction Writers, don't apologize for lack of credentials or degrees. The writing is all. @MarleneStringer
21% of fiction book purchases in 2008 were based on online awareness. --Bowker Online @FSBAssociates
Why do indie authors feel the need to vehemently defend their approach? Most readers don't care who the publisher is. Focus! @glecharles
Getting Published, Agents/Editors
How long should you wait to hear [from an agent] about your book? @BubbleCow
Craft & Technique
For fiction writers: First or Third? And How To Choose. @KimsCraftBlog
How to create a satisfying ending by @annastanisz @mystorywriter
Writers, should you outline or not? Yes. @jamesscottbell
Publishing Biz, Trends, Future of Publishing
What Can Publishers [and Authors] Learn from @CoryDoctorow by Richard Curtis
@jafurtado
Sci-fi collective, including Ursula K Le Guin, skips publishers, goes DTC via Kindle, Sony, own website via @thebookseller @glecharles
John Grisham interview [Today show video] on writing and the future of publishing @benwhiting
What literature needs is not better publbishers, or agents, but CURATORS @agnieszkasshoes
Marketing/Promotion
Valuable advice for authors on use of Twitter for book marketing @BookBuzzr
The Savvy Author's Guide to Podcasting (guest post by @EmApocalyptic) @mariaschneider
8 Tips on Creating An Army Of People To Market Your Book @tonyeldridge
Resources/ToolsFantastic info for writers interested in residencies/retreats/grants via @ @
The Writing LifeWSJ: prominent novelists describe their writing process @shelhorowitz
John Irving: "If I were 27 and trying to publish my 1st novel.. I might be tempted to shoot myself." (video) @WritersDigest
From Writer's Digest (or linking to Writer's Digest)
Download free story-building worksheets here--great for NaNoWriMo writers! @
5 Ways to Start Your Memoir on the Right Foot @WritersDigest
Successful Queries: Agent Joanna Stampfel-Volpe and "Sway" @WritersDigest
Looking for more?
Best of Twitter
Sunday, November 08, 2009 1:55:20 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Marketing in a Digital Age
Posted by Jane

More than a year ago, I left a comment on the Booksquare blog by Kassia Krozser, on a post titled "Why Publishers Should Blog." Kassia argued that publishers needed to be more vocal about supporting the titles they publish. I responded:
Definitely agree, but I have to wonder if the lack of enthusiastic
comments direct from publishers is primarily due to lack of time (and
energy, sadly). If an editor (or whomever) is juggling dozens of
projects in a given year, accomplishing just the basics can be
enormously demanding. (Lean staffs!) The “friendly” online marketing or
buzz building has often been left to the authors, rightly or wrongly.
Kassia didn't agree with me then, and now I don't agree with me either.
However: I'm not convinced it's the publishers who need to market and promote as much as the individual people who work at the publisher. That's because Publishers speaking as Publishers may not be very interesting to listen to, and it's hard to develop a relationship or carry on a conversation with the corporate entity "Publisher" unless we're talking about an imprint known for a specific type of work (like Tor), or a publisher focused on a genre (like Harlequin). What is the "voice" or approach of a publisher if they have dozens and dozens of potential target audiences?
Maybe Publishers (as corporations) don't need to "blog," but an imprint and its community of editors must be involved in efforts to spread word to a community of readers, through whatever channels or tools make sense for a particular topic, since editors are unique in their position of knowing the content so intimately (and hopefully the audience too!)—not to mention very influential in how the book performs.
All this to say two things:
First, I'm participating in a free webinar hosted by Digital Book World, Marketing in the Digital Age: Batteries Not Included.
This webinar may not be specifically geared to aspiring writers, but the story I told above is an important one when you're considering who to publish with and what to expect.
Authority and influence no longer lie with traditional media outlets and traditional marketing techniques. The old buttons we all used to press don't work any more. And frankly, many of the new buttons don't work either, depending on how well you use them.
So this webinar promises to be a fascinating discussion about what it means to market books (or content or media) in a digital age. I'll be joined by Guy Gonzalez (Digital Book World), Diana Villibert (Marie Claire), Patrick Boegel (Media Logic), and Dan Blank (Reed Business).
It's an incredible honor to be included, and it's amazing to think how far my company F+W has come in its approach to publishing.
Which leads me to my second point: I recall in 2007 longingly reviewing the first Tools of Change Conference schedule, and wanting to be savvier and more forward-looking in my publishing approach. I recall hearing Mike Shatzkin speak that same year at BEA, and feeling the urgency of his message.
I don't think I would've believed it if God himself had told me: that my company would be hosting Digital Book World in January 2010 (with Shatzkin as program chair), and covering consumer publishing issues in a way that helps me keep Writer's Digest growing and profitable when so many things in the print-based business are changing (often diminishing).
Two sessions I am most looking forward to:
Back-Loaded Book Deals: No (and Low) Advance Contracts, Profit-Sharing and Other Innovative Business Models (with Robert Miller of HarperStudio, Rogert Cooper of Perseus Vanguard, and agent Susan Ginsburg of Writer's House)
New Business Models: Changing the Commercial Rules of Publishing (with Richard Nash, Eoin Purcell, Chris Morrow, and Diane Naughton)
In short, I don't have to be sad about not being able to attend TOC any more.
Conferences/Events | Digitization & New Technology | F+W Life | Industry News & Trends | Marketing & Self-Promotion
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 7:24:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
 Monday, November 02, 2009
Every Writer Needs a Little Salesperson Inside
Posted by Jane

It's not a natural thing for most creative people to sell their work, but when it comes time to publish, you have to know something about how to sell.
You have to put in the effort, make the calls, not get beat down by rejection. (It's why I love this Alec Baldwin video, and my advice based on it.)
I'm definitely not a salesperson by nature. But it didn't take long to learn some basic skills, since my first editorial job depended on convincing salespeople my ideas were worthwhile.
Most writers need a little help in understanding how to pitch their work effectively, and I love being the one to help craft and rework that pitch.
This week I'm teaching an online course that offers an extreme makeover on query letters. You get to submit your 1-page query ahead of time, then you'll see me (in a live session) dissect all the queries into good, OK, and needs revamped.
It's a fun and illuminating process, and you learn the essential principles of selling the story (fiction) or selling an idea (nonfiction).
My goal is that every writer leave this session with a little salesperson inside who can kick into high gear when it's query-writing time.
Go register here if you have a query letter that needs professional attention. The session is this Thurday, November 5, at 1p EDT.
Also:
Conferences/Events | General | Getting Published
Monday, November 02, 2009 6:16:59 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
Writer's Digest Hits Top 10 Amazon List
Posted by Jane

Just got word that our recent release, And Here's the Kicker: Conversations With 21 Top Humor Writers on Their Craft by Mike Sacks, hit Amazon's Top 10 List of Best Entertainment Books in 2009.
Publishers Weekly gave it a starred review, and said, "Veteran journalist Sacks conducted dozens of interviews with the top humor writers of the last century, and the result is a whiz-bang collection of Q&As that will school readers just as often as it provokes laughter."
Read an excerpt: an interview with Stephen Merchant, co-creator of The Office.
(And go buy in our shop at Amazon-like pricing. Get an extra 10% off if you're a VIP.)
Craft & Technique | Fun | General | New Titles From Writer's Digest
Monday, November 02, 2009 5:55:04 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) Trackback
|
|
|
|