|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (7) |
| October, 2009 (13) |
| September, 2009 (12) |
| August, 2009 (11) |
| July, 2009 (20) |
| June, 2009 (16) |
| May, 2009 (13) |
| April, 2009 (42) |
| March, 2009 (19) |
| February, 2009 (13) |
| January, 2009 (17) |
| December, 2008 (15) |
| November, 2008 (31) |
| October, 2008 (18) |
| September, 2008 (13) |
| August, 2008 (22) |
| July, 2008 (23) |
| June, 2008 (18) |
| May, 2008 (25) |
| April, 2008 (47) |
| March, 2008 (15) |
| February, 2008 (14) |
| January, 2008 (14) |
| December, 2007 (15) |
| November, 2007 (24) |
| October, 2007 (41) |
| September, 2007 (33) |
| August, 2007 (36) |
| July, 2007 (48) |
| June, 2007 (9) |
|
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Friday, June 29, 2007
Friday SPAM Poetry Prompt #629
Posted by Nancy
Welcome to the first in a regular series of Friday postings--the SPAM poetry prompt of the week. I started saving weird subject lines from SPAM and PHISH e-mails when F&W established a program wherein we review a daily list of blocked e-mails to see if any need to be un-blocked. Since I oversee four different company mailboxes, that's a lot of SPAM. Of course, some of the wording really is colorful, so I started saving choice subject lines in a Word document with the thought that I would someday make up poetry prompts from them.
That day has arrived. Each Friday I will post one of these prompts. Here are some general guidelines:
1) Prompts are simply to get you going. Don't feel you have to stick to the wording, directions, or spirit of the prompt if your writing begins to take you in a different direction.
2) If you don't like my "take" on the prompt, make up your own!
3) Do not post your poems in comments if you hope to submit them for publication or as entries in a poetry contest. My view (see Published is Published below), shared by many poetry editors and contest coordinators/judges, is that poems posted in "comments" are considered published. Whether you agree or disagree, consider whether this is really the venue where you want to share you work.
4) I promise to subject myself to--er, try to create something from these prompts as well.
If this all turns out to be one miserable exercise in lame-isity, I will stop. Polite comments will suffice; threats and petitions will not be necessary.
So, here goes with prompt #1:
Don't want no short sausage man.
Yeah, we know what they're really talking about. But let's regard this statement literally, i.e., don't want no short man selling sausage. Why not? Who is he? What does he look like? Where is he selling the sausage? In a butcher shop? At a festival concession stand? On a street corner? Why don't you "want" him? What don't you want him to do?
After you've thought about it (or not--thinking too much can be the bane of creativity), try using this line as the start of a nursery rhyme, nonsense verse, or blues poem. Or simply follow your free-writing and see where it takes you.
--Nancy
Poetry Prompts
Friday, June 29, 2007 4:52:03 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Poet's Idol?
Posted by Robert
It's definitely an interesting idea that Jeannine Hall Gailey raises. I've actually pondered this myself before as a way to bring contemporary poetry to the masses.
Jeannine says her dream panel of judges would include Bob Hicock, Denise Duhamel, and either Louise Gluck or Margaret Atwood (heck, why not both?).
Two of these poets would definitely be on my dream panel too. And then I'd throw in someone random like Paris Hilton or Hulk Hogan. Just to boost ratings, of course.
Who would be on your panel?
Source: Jeannine Blogs General
Friday, June 29, 2007 2:53:01 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
I'm Coming Out of the Closet...
Posted by robert
...on how I first got published. Let me know if you've heard this one before.
Around the age of 16, I noticed an ad in the paper for a FREE poetry contest that offered $500 to the winner. About a year into writing abstract and angst-filled song lyrics that I called poetry, I decided that I could probably win this contest--not that I was sure of myself or anything.
So I entered the contest. Unfortunately, I did not win the $500 prize. Fortunately, I was the lucky winner of an Honorable Mention certificate, and the company decided to accept the poem for publication in an anthology they were putting together. It only cost like $60. So, of course, I jumped in and bought the anthology and even a coffee cup (pictured below).
However, things started going south once I received the anthology and realized that the poetry in it was not exceptionally good. And when I looked at my poem surrounded by these other poems, I realized my poem probably wasn't particularly gifted either.
Suddenly, I was getting offers to enter another FREE contest. So I sent them my absolute worst poem. It was also an award winner that merited publication. Of course, of course. I felt like such a sucker.
Over the years, this company would send me notifications of contests, gifts I could buy to commemorate my great achievements, offers to spend thousands of dollars attending their prize ceremonies, where I could also win big money.
They were unrelenting, and for over a decade it has been a dark secret hidden in my past. Something I've been ashamed to admit. But no more. I want others who've fallen into this trap to know they're not alone; I want others who could fall into this trap to know what I did not know as a junior in high school: stay away. There's nothing illegal going on, but ethics are thrown out the window, for sure.
If you've had a similar experience or have a "friend" who's gone through this, I definitely encourage you to share.
Best,
Robert

Yes, I bought the coffee cup. What was I thinking?!? ;)
Advice | Personal Updates | Poetry Publishing
Friday, June 29, 2007 2:28:24 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Thursday, June 28, 2007
Free Advertising for Poetry
Posted by Robert
The Luzerne County Transportation Authority in Pennsylvania is "going to display poems and artwork on placards inside buses," as part of a one-year free advertising space program between Lamar Advertising and Wilkes University.
Source: The Citizens' Voice Poetry News
Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:30:01 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Opportunity for Young Poets
Posted by Robert
Here's an opportunity for poets aged 13-27 to submit up to 3 spoken word pieces to perform at the Sundance Summit: A Mayors' Gathering on Climate Protection. There will be 3 winners who get a free trip to Utah to perform, along with $500.
Check out the details at
http://witsblog.org/2007/06/27/another-op/ Poetry News
Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:14:10 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Published is Published!
Posted by Nancy
A couple of weeks ago I participated in an editor's panel at the National Federation of State Poetry Societies Convention in Oklahoma City. My fellow panelists were Madelyn Eastlund (former NFSPS president and editor of Harp-Strings Poetry Journal) and Sandra Soli (a very experienced poetry editor and widely published poet). The three of us looked as if we were auditioning for a community theatre production of Evita, our arms waving wildly as our voices rose addressing one publishing point or another.
The discussion became most lively when the topic of "What is published?" came up. We each took a turn explaining that ANY poem that is offered for public consumption, whether on the printed page, on the Internet, or in an open reading, is basically "published." The exception is a private forum where the poet needs a password to participate in a discussion and to read what's posted. Poems posted in such forums are not considered published. However, if the forum can be read by anyone accessing the Internet, then the poem is considered published.
"Published is published!" Sandy exclaimed. And still the questions came.
"But what if I print a poem in my church bulletin?"
"What if my poem appears in my club's quarterly journal?"
"What if I read my poem on a radio program?"
"Published is published!" Sandy and Madelyn shouted over and over again.
I mention this because 1) it's a really important point all poets need to keep in mind; and, 2) it's a point I need to address as it relates to comments on this blog.
Please be aware that if you post a poem in the comments here, it is now published. It's not a legitimate publishing credit that you can use; however, where the poem is concerned, you've just blown its "unpublished" status. That means you can't submit it to journals that don't consider published material, and you can't submit it to contests for unpublished poetry only.
So, please don't post your poetry in the comments section unless you know what you're sacrificing by doing so. It doesn't matter whether you print a copyright notice or not--if the poem appears in the comments, it's published. Published is published!
(As an added note, let me say that when I've judged contests recently that were for unpublished poetry only, I did Google key lines from the poems I'd selected as winners to make sure they didn't already appear on the Web. In a couple of cases, I had to disqualify poems I'd deemed for serious prize consideration because they violated the "unpublished" criteria. What's more, taking down a post--or a blog entry, for that matter--accomplishes nothing. Once something is on the Internet, it's on there forever. Ever see the stuff that Google has cached that doesn't appear on the actual website when you do a search? It's not nice to fool Mother Nature, but it's just about IMPOSSIBLE to fool the Internet!)
--Nancy
UPDATE: Reb Livingston at Home-Schooled By a Cackling Jackel has a spirited discussion going on at her blog about this topic. Definitely take a look (and be sure to click through on her links to "My Stance" and related responses). I stand by the above opinion as basic need-to-know information, especially if you're new to publishing. But there are some important issues related to the published vs. unpublished topic that concerned poets should examine as well.
UPDATE 2: This post provides further discussion of the "is reading my poetry in public the same as publishing" question that came up during Q&A at the NFSPS panel. Advice | Poetry Publishing | Q&A
Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:24:13 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Already a Bit of Serendipity
Posted by Robert
The post office decided to help me out with this blog by delivering a package including Issue 53 (March 2007) of remark.--this issue actually guest-edited by C. Allen Rearick. This very well could be the last acceptance I can point to this year, and I'm not ashamed to admit that my poem "buried alive" is by far the shortest piece in the issue measuring in at only 4 lines. For me, it's not the size that matters, but what you do with that size.
I could just say, "Go me," and call it a blog, but I really want this to develop into a community. So I'm going to include one of my TOP SECRET poetry submission tips: When you submit batches of poems, whether 2 or 10, vary the length of your pieces.
Putting on my editor's cap, I have to make editorial decisions based off many criteria. Space is one criterion that comes up often. If an editor has 30 lines to fill and 2 poets with 20-line poems, then it's simple mathematics that only 1 poet will make it in the issue. That gives you a 50% chance of being accepted. If you happened to include a killer poem of 10 lines or less, then your chances increase.
Of course, the shorter poem still has to be very good and fit within the editorial scheme the editor has planned for that issue, but editors constantly are forced to make difficult decisions between poems and poets they love equally. If you have quality poems of different lengths, it makes perfect math sense to bundle different sized poems.
Let me know if you agree or disagree with this. Let's continue to build our community together.
Best,
Robert
Advice | Personal Updates
Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:43:06 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, June 26, 2007
BLOGGING--AT LAST!
Posted by Nancy
On New Year's Eve 2005, I included on my list of resolutions, "Start blogging!" I didn't quite achieve that goal in 2006, although I did post a couple of author blog entries at Amazon.com. I thought about starting a private blog, but that never materialized, either. Then we market editors learned that F&W Publications would be creating blogs related to our market books (I edit Poet's Market), so I decided to wait to see what transpired.
I'm glad I did wait, because the unexpected development is that I get to co-blog with Robert Brewer, who not only edits Writer's Market, Writer's Market Deluxe, and WritersMarket.com, but is a published poet himself. Between the two of us, we bring an interesting mix of backgrounds, perspectives, experience, and generational viewpoints to Poetic Asides.
Here, briefly, is my "bio": As I said, I edit Poet's Market for Writer's Digest Books (I'll be starting production on my ninth edition soon). I've been writing and publishing poetry for over 30 years, although less over the past 10 years or so (the reasons for which I'll be addressing in future posts). I've had two chapbooks published: Rites and Observances (Finishing Line Press) and How Time Got Away (Pudding House Publications). And I'm totally disgusted with myself for my lack of poetic output. I don't write enough. I'm hoping to do better--and to submit more poems to journals. For now, though, I'm blogging from a deep sense of inadequacy. Perhaps you can relate.
I'm a big fan of blogs, and one of the things I like best about them is the sense of immediacy and almost rawness. So I'm not going to plan content ahead of time too much or struggle to polish every post to the nth degree. I will strive to be interesting (I hope--accepting that "interesting" is a relative term).
So, on behalf of one half of the blogging team of Poetic Asides, I bid you welcome!
--Nancy
General
Tuesday, June 26, 2007 4:15:47 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Let us go then, you and I...
Posted by Robert
I've always loved the opening to T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock." What better way to open my first post for Poetic Asides, which I hope will be a springboard for poets to build a community and dialogue with each other. So why this blog?
As a poet myself who submits, who gets rejected, and who (sometimes) gets accepted, I plan to help share my experiences as a working poet. Hopefully, that leads to inspiration and comments that will allow us to share experiences and knowledge with each other.
As an editor who deals with other editors and publishing professionals, I plan to share news, insider views, and possibly interviews to help give a clear picture of the poetry "business" of things. I, of course, use the word "business" lightly, since poetry is almost never about the money, but more about the love of writing and sharing words and worldviews.
So thank you for reading this introductory post. Now, let us go, you and I to build a dialogue. This is your blog as much as it is mine and Nancy's.
Best,
Robert
General
Tuesday, June 26, 2007 3:57:47 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
|
|