|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| December, 2008 (5) |
| November, 2008 (30) |
| October, 2008 (18) |
| September, 2008 (13) |
| August, 2008 (22) |
| July, 2008 (23) |
| June, 2008 (18) |
| May, 2008 (25) |
| April, 2008 (47) |
| March, 2008 (15) |
| February, 2008 (14) |
| January, 2008 (14) |
| December, 2007 (14) |
| November, 2007 (25) |
| October, 2007 (41) |
| September, 2007 (33) |
| August, 2007 (36) |
| July, 2007 (48) |
| June, 2007 (9) |
|
Search
Archives
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Friday, October 12, 2007
Editor meets Henry Rollins
Posted by Nancy
No, it wasn't me--it was Erika O'Connell, former assistant editor of Poet's Market and now editor of Artist's & Graphic Designer's Market. Erika has a terrific post up at her blog about meeting Rollins the other night. It expands into a memoir that covers the roots of lifelong friendship, youthful rebellion, a passion for punk (especially Henry Rollins), Lollapalooza, and artist Erik Rose! Give yourself a treat and take a look.
--Nancy
General | Poets
10/12/2007 11:42:45 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, October 11, 2007
The Futility Review applies for a Poet's Market listing!
Posted by Nancy
As I said in this post, I'm quite taken with The Futility Review. To my honor and delight, I found in my e-mail inbox a completed questionnaire from Jeffery Bahr, Managing Editor, for a Poet's Market listing in the Magazines/Journals section. I can't resist sharing this questionnaire with you (with Mr. Bahr's permission).
If The Futility Review were to appear in Poet's Market, here's exactly how it would look (minus the little icons, which I'm not sure how to transfer to our blog format):
THE FUTILITY REVIEW
Longmont CO 80501. E-mail: info@futilityreview.com. Website: www.futilityreview.com. Established 2007. Contact: Jeffery Bahr, managing director. Member: CLMP (pending).
• Highest difficulty rating on An Approximate Print Journal Ranking site (www.jefferybahr.com/Publications/PubRankings.asp).
Magazine Needs The Futility Review, published annually in print and online, is "dedicated to the non-publication of the finest poetry in America. All submissions are subjected to a multi-tier hierarchy of editors dedicated to treating all poets, and their works, with the same degree of empathy and discrimination." Wants "your best work only, and have a preference for guile over craft. We are particularly fond of paradelles." Does not want: "Poems must not include the words 'limn,' 'shard,' or 'numinous.'" Has "avoided publishing poems by almost every major poet." The Futility Review is digest-sized, printed on demand, saddle-stitched (catgut), with cover with "easily available artwork," includes ads. Receives about 3,000 poems/year, accepts 0%. Press run is "most often none"; distributed free to the homeless. Number of unique visitors: 250/week. Single copy: free; subscription: free.
How to Submit Submit 3-5 poems at a time. Lines/poem: no restrictions. Considers simultaneous submissions; no previously published poems. ("Previously published" includes poetry posted on a public website/blog/forum as well as poetry posted on a private, password-protected forum.) Accepts e-mail (as attachment) and disk submissions; no fax submissions. Cover letter is unnecessary. "The excellence of your work will be reflected in the quality of the rejection. We also accept submissions by singing telegram." Reads submissions year round. Poems are circulated to an editorial board. Sometimes comments on rejected poems. Guidelines available by e-mail or on website. Responds in 2 weeks. No payment. Acquires first North American serial rights. Rights revert to poets upon publication.
Advice "You’ve been rejected by the rest, now get rejected by the best. We strive to maintain a very high quality of rejection notices."
NOTE: Seriously, check out An Approximate Print Journal Ranking and other great information on Jeffery Bahr's site, including those incredible Best American Poetry (or BAP) statistical breakdowns.
--Nancy General | Poetry Publishing
10/11/2007 3:57:34 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Kyrielle: a French poetic form
Posted by Robert
The kyrielle is a French four-line stanza form that has a refrain in the fourth line. Often, there is a rhyme scheme in the poem consisting of the following possibilities:
The poem can be as long as you wish and as short as two stanzas (otherwise, the refrain is not really a refrain, is it?), and, as with many French forms, it is very nice for stretching your poetic muscles.
Also, tres importante! Your lines must contain 8 syllables. I've written an example below to show how this poem works (on a technical level).
"She's not a Pretty Singer"
Evening cell phone conversation-- he rakes his hair with long fingers that were once filled with devotion, though she's not a pretty singer.
He never was a man to say, "baby," or let his eyes linger, and she only likes boys who stay, but she's not a pretty singer.
So he offered his warm coat to another to start a fling her aging looks could never undo, and she's not a pretty singer.
Some say she moved to another state and made her name selling or buying something, though why bother when she's not a pretty singer?
*****
Here are some other resources on the kyrielle form:
*****
Check out other Poetic Forms.
Poetic Forms
10/11/2007 3:56:02 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Doris Lessing Takes the Nobel Prize in Literature
Posted by Robert
Poetry News
10/11/2007 7:33:04 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Robert Hass: National Book Award & the Nobel Literature Prize
Posted by Robert
No, Robert Hass has not won the Nobel Literature Prize. Not yet. However, the next winner of the Nobel will be announced tomorrow and speculation of who will win is mounting:
*****
So, why did I mention Robert Hass? Well, I had The New York Times review of his most recent poetry collection, Time and Materials: Poems, 1997-2005 (Ecco/HarperCollins), forwarded my way by Faulty Mindbomb contributor Caili Wilk. (Thanks!)
"The Limits of Influence," by Stephen Burt, gives a nice review.
I read the collection myself in May/June of this year. Many advance copies were available at the popular book buzz forum at BookExpo America in New York this year. There were few advance copies of poetry available at the event, but I was surely glad to have Hass.
Out of dozens of books that I'd collected at the expo, Time and Materials was the only one I read at Laguardia while waiting for my plane. And yes, I read it on the plane, too. And yes, again, I continued reading it at home. Yes, I'm giving the collection a thumbs up. (That's as close as you'll get to a review out of me, I think.)
*****
Oh yeah? Why did I bother to put "National Book Award" in the title of this post? Maybe because Publishers Lunch passed on the National Book Award finalists in poetry. They are:
- Linda Gregerson, Magnetic North (Houghton Mifflin Company)
- Robert Hass, Time and Materials (Ecco/HarperCollins)
- David Kirby, The House on Boulevard St. (Louisiana State University Press)
- Stanley Plumly, Old Heart (W.W. Norton & Company)
- Ellen Bryant Voigt, Messenger: New and Selected Poems 1976-2006 (W.W. Norton & Company)
As you'll notice, Hass is one of the finalists. Looks like a pretty strong field this year. I now have four new books to hunt down at the bookstore.
*****
Check out other Poetry News. Poetry News | Poetry Publishing | Poets
10/10/2007 2:31:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Sean O'Brien & Walt Whitman
Posted by Robert
There are a couple pieces on Sean O'Brien winning the U.K.'s Forward Poetry Prizes award for the Best Collection...for his third time.
*****
"'Leaves of Grass' Still Growing, Inspiring," by Diane Ackerman for NPR, is a great piece on Walt Whitman and why his words are still vital to poets today. Personally, he's one of the best. Seriously.
*****
Check out other Poetry News. Poetry News | Poets
10/9/2007 11:00:22 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 08, 2007
A little bit about a few poets...
Posted by Robert
Poetry News | Poets
10/8/2007 4:53:25 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Good laugh on a Monday morning...
Posted by Nancy
Take a look at The Futility Review. If you don't get a hoot out of this, you haven't been submitted submitting poetry often or long enough, or you haven't read many submission guidelines. (Along about March, when I'm getting twitchy from proofing too many listings or writing up new ones, all submission guidelines start looking like this to me.)
Thanks to C. Dale Young at Avoiding the Muse, where I first read about this.
--Nancy Commentary | General
10/8/2007 10:22:18 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
I don't usually do these, but...
Posted by Robert
...I had this great idea (at least, I thought so) for a poetry prompt this morning. One of the perks of working at F+W Publications is that I'm constantly surrounded by a wide range of enthusiast magazines and books (from writing to scuba diving and from coin collecting to decorative painting).
This morning I'm breezing through the production department and see two brand new titles: one for some kind of knitting and the other with the image of a handgun on the cover with the title of Glock.
Of course, my mind started spinning on some yarn about an old woman who knits a pretty carrying case for her glock. And maybe it's not her glock; maybe it's for her grandson Bruno who works for the mob. The possibilities are endless really with a knitting-glock juxtaposition.
And that's what my (long-winded) poetry prompt is: Juxtapose two or more seemingly unrelated things (images, ideas, people, etc.) to create an interesting poem.
The nice thing about juxtaposition is that it can increase tension and make an interesting idea unforgettable. Have fun going at it. If you wish to share, post your poem in the comments below.
*****
Check out other Poetry Prompts.
Personal Updates | Poetry Prompts
10/8/2007 9:15:44 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, October 05, 2007
Another Update...
Posted by Robert
...I've posted the most recent Faulty Mindbomb. This issue features Patricia Kennelly's "Believe Me" at http://faultymindbomb.blogspot.com.
*****
Remember: If you'd like to submit to the journal (basically, a one-man nonprofit operation run by yours truly), then send a few poems my way at theaphexshrug@hotmail.com. I don't accept everything, but I'm pretty nice and try to get back relatively fast.
*****
Happy weekend!
Personal Updates | Poetry Publishing
10/5/2007 11:00:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Speaking of Poet Laureates...
Posted by Robert
...oh, we weren't speaking of poet laureates? Well, that's okay, because here are two good pieces on them speaking.
*****
From Guardian Unlimited, here's a speech by UK Poet Laureate, Andrew Motion, on the relationship between poetry and power. His whole speech transcript is available. Highly recommended.
*****
"Americans still love poetry, says poet laureate Pinsky," by Lila Hanft for ClevelandJewishNews.com, profiles the former U.S. poet laureate. In the article, Robert Pinsky says, "As dancing is to movement, as cuisine is to nutrition, as lovemaking is to procreation, poetry is an art: an expressive form of speech. If art is important, poetry is important."
*****
Check out other Poetry News.
Poetry News | Poets
10/5/2007 12:14:52 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Poetry Submissions: October Style
Posted by Robert
So in the past week, I've made several poetry submissions to:
*****
I've also submitted a chapbook manuscript to the Wick Open Poetry Competition for Ohio poets.
*****
While part of me wants complete acceptance from all of the above, I'd really be happy with an acceptance from at least one.
*****
Actually, a nice rejection note from any of the above would go a long way toward making me feel good.
*****
Or even a coffee stain on one of the form rejection letters. (It doesn't take much.)
Personal Updates
10/5/2007 9:24:28 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, October 04, 2007
Done With Harry Potter? Read Poetry...
Posted by Robert
Brian Klems, who manages WritersDigest.com and has his own Questions & Quandaries blog, alerted me to the following cool pieces available on the site:
- "On the Edge: Poetry for the Younger Set," by Kara Gebhart Uhl, asks, "Will the creation of a Children's Poet Laureate and the staying power of novels-in-verse allow room for new writers in the burgeoning market?" The article includes advice from the United States first Children's Poet Laureate, Jack Prelutsky, as well as Janet Schulman (editor-at-large of Random House Children's Books), Julie Larios (author of Yellow Elephant), Steven Malk (agent at Writers House), and many more.
- "Children's Poetry Markets," compiled by Alice Pope, lists nine book publishers that accept novels-in-verse book ideas.
- And since I just mentioned her--if you're interested in "poetry for the younger set," then I suggest you check out Alice Pope's CWIM blog on a regular basis at http://cwim.blogspot.com.
*****
Check out other Poetry News. Poetry News | Poetry Publishing | Poets
10/4/2007 12:22:42 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Friday SPAM poetry prompt #1005 (one day early)
Posted by Nancy
SPAM prompt line: Would you like to see more cash in your purse?
Since I'm taking a break today and Friday (for what I hope will be a quiet, pleasant fall excursion among the Amish of Holmes Co., Ohio), I'm putting up this Friday's SPAM prompt a day early.
I thought it would be interesting to write a prose poem, or try to. I've attempted prose poems before and didn't feel confident about what I had on the page. But if you all are willing to give it a shot, I am as well.
I'm not going to say anything about the prompt line. Take it wherever you will. If you're new to writing prose poems or need a refresher, The Academy of American Poets provides a discussion of the form here; while Double Room: a journal of prose poetry and flash fiction provides many excellent examples online.
--Nancy
Find more poetry prompts here.
Poetry Prompts
10/4/2007 12:23:07 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, October 03, 2007
Winner of The Lenore Marshall Prize Announced!
Posted by Robert
(Thanks to Caili Wilk for forwarding the press release!)
Alice Notley's Grave of Light: New and Selected Poems 1970-2005 (Wesleyan University Press) was chosen by poets David Baker, Mark McMorris and Marie Ponsot to receive the 2007 Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize, which awards $25,000 to the most outstanding book of poetry published the previous year (as decided by the Academy of American Poets).
Ponsot remarked of Notley's winning title: "These poems give us thirty-five years of political, personal, death-defying engagement. The nature Notley most loves is human nature. That urban passion propels her speculative dramas of gender, class, and race; of Vietnam and Iraq; of schemes of power and the claims of art. Ardent and agile, she is willing to cry out, to drift, to stammer, so as to put every turn of language to her use. Her aim is to speak to everyone; her book shows her success."
David Wojahn's Interrogation Palace (University of Pittsburgh Press) was chosen as the finalist for the award.
I couldn't find a link on their site, but I'm sure there will be more information forthcoming from the Academy of American Poets at www.poets.org.
*****
Check out other Poetry News. Poetry News | Poets
10/3/2007 6:23:46 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Does Self-Publishing Wreck Poetry Careers?
Posted by Robert
Received this question via e-mail from poet Liesl Garner:
"Last year I performed a poetry show at our local Fringe Festival. I got wonderful reviews, and I am performing a Repeat Performance in October of this year. The Fringe Festival is every Spring, and I plan to participate each year. After my first show, I was asked if I had my poetry printed in a chapbook for sale. I didn't, but for the Repeat Performance I want to have that available for audience members. I'm actually thinking of doing a chapbook for each year's performance. Is it bad for my hopes and dreams of someday becoming a published poet to be doing my own publishing of chapbooks?
"Currently, I just don't have the time to be submitting with the numbers I would have to in order to get noticed by a publisher. However, on my local scene, I have a large fan base that wants to see my work in print.
"Thanks, Liesl Garner"
Before I get into my ramble, you should probably read Nancy's Published Is Published post about what self-publishing will do to those poems that are self-published in the eyes of editors. Then, come back here to read what I have to say.
(Tapping on desk as Liesl reads Nancy's post. Ba-ba-ba. Humming to self.)
Back?
Okay then.
So you now know that self-publishing any of your poems will have editors considering those specific poems already published, right? That doesn't mean your career is over, it just means these specific poems are now only available as reprints. This fact can hurt when submitting to poetry journals and magazines or even chapbook contests. But the publication of some of your poems does not affect what you do with other poems that are not self-published.
If you decide that for the current crop of poems you wish to self-publish that it is okay if they risk being only available in your self-published chapbook format, then you should go for it. More and more poets are doing this. However, if you wish to see any of these specific poems in some journal or future chapbook competition winning collection, you may not want to include in your self-publishing effort.
As far as actually self-publishing, I advise you to either go with a local printer that you can work with directly--or there are some online POD companies that allow you to print and publish only one book at a time, which dramatically lowers the investment you have to make in your self-publishing venture. I'm sure some very nice poets (hint, hint) could even give suggestions in the blog comments below. Even if not, that's why God created Google; just type "POD Publishers" into Google, and you will receive plenty of online resources of how and who to proceed with.
On another note, there's no shame in self-publishing. Through the ages, poets have been especially prone to self-publication. And that trend only seems to be expanding even more with online and POD technologies now available to poets.
Just remember: Self-publishing does equal publishing. So those specific poems that are self-published could pay the price with publishers in the short term. Of course, most poets would agree that you're not risking much financially by self-publishing over traditional publication. For many, the main goal is to just reach an engaged audience.
Best,
Robert
Advice | Commentary | Poetry Publishing | Q&A
10/3/2007 12:57:40 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
Poetry Internationale!?!
Posted by Robert
Thanks to Rus Bowden for finding the following threads discussing whether American poetry shouldn't be internationalized:
From the Virginia Quarterly Review: http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2007/09/20/muldoon-to-take-over-as-new-yorker-poetry-editor
From the Chronicle of Higher Education: http://chronicle.com/blogs/footnoted/index.php?id=636
From Books, Inq. blog: http://booksinq.blogspot.com/2007/09/at-least-its-not-outsourcing.html
*****
Now, my take? Earlier this year, I was published in an Australian lit journal. Within the past week, I was asked if I was originally British, because of my writing style and subjects. However, I've spent my entire life in Southwest Ohio orbiting between Cincinnati and Dayton.
If I consider myself anything (geographically speaking), it is a Southwest Ohio poet (not an American or International poet). I write about things important to me in this quadrant of this state (and, of course, other places that I happen to visit).
Actually, I think this is a loaded topic. Poets need to write what they know. Again and again, I can see a dramatic improvement in the quality of other poets (myself included) when they quit trying to make things up in their poetry and instead just get real (this holds true regardless of style or structure).
So my thought process leads me to think that poets shouldn't be concerned with whether poetry is internationalized or regionalized. That's something for anthology editors and anthropologists and politicians to fiddle over. Poets should focus on writing what is true and letting everyone else debate the meanings.
I'd love to hear if any of my readers have thoughts on this subject. Commentary | Poetry Publishing
10/3/2007 8:50:13 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Very Good Article on Charles Simic
Posted by Robert
Poetry News | Poets
10/2/2007 2:17:41 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 01, 2007
A PROMPT RESPONSE: #720 Are you still with short ramrod?
Posted by Nancy
I am so far behind! I originally posted this prompt way back in July. I've written to it a few times, but never felt I had anything to work with. However, now I'm determined during the month of October to finally catch up on these prompts, so I made myself get to work.
This untitled draft is the semi-polished version of what I'd come up with after lots of wheel-spinning:
He was sort of a runt, stocky
and ungraceful. He wasn't
dreamboat material with his broad,
turned-up nose, off-kilter smile (not
crooked, like Gable's, just skewed),
watery eyes that protruded a bit.
The wavy blond hair should have counted
for something, but it lacked highlights
and sat on his skull like a lop-sided cap.
Appearances get in the way
in seventh grade: He was friendly, with maybe even
kindness behind those dull eyes. He was
"one of the guys," even though he wasn't crude
and never baited the nuns to score points.
No one disliked him. He simply
didn't make hearts flutter.
I thought he'd scored the last laugh
when he married one of my high school classmates,
a bookish girl who developed style and luster
as she matured. She made a beautiful bride,
still as smart and funny as she'd been
freshman year. She and her scruffy groom
were laughing and affectionate, as if they enjoyed
each other as well as their romance. No one
would have modeled a cake topper after
the mismatched pair, but everyone at the reception
smiled watching them dance, the two of them
grinning, gazing (him up, her down)
into each other's eyes.
No, I wasn't happy about this version at all. It was too wordy, and too bogged down with details that weren't needed. Originally I'd said not to write an epic, and I wanted to at least try to follow my own directions.
I pared and rewrote lines, wrote new lines, and wound up frequently glowering at the computer screen. Finally I decided to focus on the original wording of the prompt: Are you still with short Ramrod? I started with the first meeting with the unlikely bride, instead of going back in time to establish the details of why "Ramrod" wasn't especially attractive. I was able to work in some of the imagery from my previous draft, although I'm still not satisifed with this poem at all. Maybe if I take a look at it six months from now, I can see how to fix it--or whether it's worth any more effort.
BELIEVE ME OR YOUR LYING EYES
I'd gone to school with her fiancé
in seventh grade. She must have read my mind
when she told me they were engaged.
She chuckled. Yeah, he's a smart-ass
little runt. Coming from her,
it sounded like an endearment.
She and I been friends off and on in high school.
Knowing her, I couldn't imagine them together.
Then I realized I didn't know her at all,
had no idea whether he was her "type."
His father and I were members
of the church choir, and we sang at the wedding.
The bride was lovely, outclassed
her groom in every way; but they seemed
happy, enjoying the party and each other
as if romance were gravy. The guests
smiled to see them dance together,
the mismatched couple grinning,
gazing (him up, her down)
into each other's eyes.
I didn't see her for a decade or more.
At our ten-year reunion she told me
they were divorced. He was a jerk,
she announced with a live-and-learn shrug.
I didn't know what to say. A jerk,
a runty, unappealing jerk--that
had been my impression of him all along.
I'm sorry was all I could say.
Then we let it go, and talked about school.
[Sigh.] Maybe the next prompt will go better.
--Nancy
Go here to see more prompts and responses.
Poetry Prompts
10/1/2007 5:08:01 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|
|