|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| September, 2008 (3) |
| August, 2008 (4) |
| July, 2008 (4) |
| June, 2008 (3) |
| May, 2008 (4) |
| April, 2008 (5) |
| March, 2008 (4) |
| February, 2008 (4) |
| January, 2008 (5) |
| December, 2007 (3) |
| November, 2007 (5) |
| October, 2007 (5) |
| September, 2007 (4) |
| August, 2007 (4) |
| July, 2007 (3) |
| June, 2007 (4) |
| May, 2007 (4) |
| April, 2007 (4) |
| March, 2007 (3) |
| February, 2007 (1) |
|
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, August 05, 2008
Contractions With Proper Nouns (Brian's a baseball Fan)
Q: I recently got into a grammar debate with my wife and would like you to settle things for us once and for all: Can you use contractions with a proper noun ("Jodie's in charge" instead of "Jodie is in charge")?—Benjamin W.A: There are two main reasons to use apostrophes: 1. to form a possessive ( Brian's baseball team wears green) and 2. to replace missing letters ( Brian has a baseball jersey that's [that is] green). But does that replacement rule apply to names, places and things ( Brian's a baseball fan)? Whether it's a pronoun, plain noun or proper noun, it is acceptable to tack the apostrophe-s onto the end of nouns to replace "is." There are no rules against it. In fact, if you search in stylebooks, online grammar sources and the like, there really isn't any information floating around on this specific use of the apostrophe-s ('s). So I am hereby declaring this the Klems Rule (after all, I've always wanted a grammatical rule named after me). To make sure something wasn't slipping past me, I contacted my fellow grammarian Bill Walsh, copy chief at The Washington Post and author of The Elephants of Style (McGraw-Hill) and asked him about this rule. "If Brian's a baseball fan, then Brian's a baseball fan," Walsh says. "Aside from questions of formality, the only stumbling block might be if your proper noun ends in s—Washington's a great town, but Paris ... Paris just 'is.'" Ultimately this is a style issue and you have the choice whether or not to apply it to your writing. If you're writing something formal, like a white paper or thesis, you probably shouldn't use it—then again, you probably shouldn't use any contractions. But if you're writing an article, short story or book, there's no reason you can't. And if someone challenges you, refer him to the Klems Rule. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
8/5/2008 4:04:22 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Begging The Question: How To Use It Correctly
Q: I've been told that I often misuse the phrase "begs the question" in my writing. Can you explain to me how to use this phrase correctly and give me an example? Thanks. —AnonymousA: "Begging the question" is a phrase that's commonly misused. In fact, even I misused it once in an editor's note for my e-newsletter (special thanks to loyal reader Rachel Heslin for catching my misstep, though she's now off my Christmas card list—kidding ... I don't even have a Christmas card list). But the important thing is to get it correct in the future, so let's dive in and define this phrase. The common misconception is that "begging the question" means to raise or ask a question: This week's writing prompt begs the question, "What are babies really talking about? That is wrong with a capital "W" and, if space permits, an exclamation point. "Begging the question" is a type of logical fallacy that deals with unproven premises and conclusions, which the sentence above doesn't contain. Merriam-Webster defines "begging the question" as "to pass over or ignore a question by assuming it to be established or settled." In other words, it means that you're stating as fact what you are trying to prove. For example: Brian Klems is funny because he writes humorously. The conclusion is that Brian is funny. The premise assumes that he writes humorously. There's no evidence in the statement that supports the claim that he's funny. Therefore, the sentence should read: Brian Klems is funny because he writes humorously, but that argument begs the question of whether he writes humorously or not.The term "begging the question" is just circular reasoning, so be sure to use the phrase only when that circular reasoning is being applied. If it's not, use "asks the question" or "raises the question." But seriously, though, I am funny. I promise. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
7/29/2008 3:45:33 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Allude vs. Elude
Q: What’s the difference between “allude” and “elude”? Are they interchangeable? —AnonymousA: “Allude” and “elude” are frequently misused in place of each other, even though they’re about as different as broccoli and ice cream. “Allude” means to refer to something in a casual or indirect way. Michelle alluded to my tardiness by glancing at her watch when I arrived. My wife alludes to her birthday a week in advance by leaving a Things-I-Want list on the refrigerator.“Elude,” on the other hand, means to avoid or escape from by quickness or cunning. Justin eludes the police by hiding in a bush. I eluded the school bully—and a wedgie—by ducking behind the principal’s car. Make sure to use these words correctly in your writing. Otherwise, picky agents and editors may try to elude you. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
7/22/2008 1:50:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Quotes Within Quotes
Q: When should I use single quotes instead of double quotes?—John BatsonA: Double quotation marks signify the exact words of someone else speaking in your writing. Single quotation marks come into play when the person you’re quoting quotes someone or something else. Look at this example: “I’m irritated with Dad right now,” said my sister. “Last week he said to me, ‘Jennie, if you don’t wash your own clothes, I’m going to start throwing them in the backyard.’ Last night I found my favorite shirt hanging from the bird-feeder.”
The writer is quoting his sister, Jennie. She gets the double quote marks credited to her speech. But while Jennie is talking, she quotes her dad. His words (which she’s reciting) get the single marks. As sentences become more complicated with multiple quotes, the rule is to alternate between double and single marks. “I talked to Mom last night and she said, ‘I agree with your father. And when he says, “I’m going to throw your clothes in the backyard,” he means it.’ This is laundry war!”
So use single quotes only inside double quotes. And you can quote me on that—as long as you use the correct set of marks. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
7/8/2008 2:19:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, May 06, 2008
The A's and An's of Grammar
Q: I know “a” goes before words beginning with a consonant and “an” before words that start with a vowel. But it seems like lately it’s become fashionable in print to use “an” with any word beginning with the letter “h.” Try to say “an half an hour”: You’ll wind up with a sprained tongue! What’s the correct rule?—Tad C. RhodenA: It’s all about the sound of the first letter of the word following “a” or “an.” While “a” generally is used in front of consonants (a dog, a cat, a purple people-eater), every now and again, it creeps its way in front of words that begin with a “u” or “eu.” The true rule here is when the word following the article begins with a consonant sound, use “a.” For example: People gain knowledge and discipline at a university. I’m planning a European vacation in August. The “u” in “university” and “eu” in “European” make a “y” sound—a consonant sound—therefore, “a” is used. On the flip side, “an” goes before words starting with a vowel sound (an elephant, an anteater, an obnoxious purple people-eater). Some consonants fall into this category, such as the letter “h.” When the “h” is silent—like in “hour” and “honor”—use “an”: Would you like me to bring an hors d’oeuvre? When you hear the “h,” stick with “a”: I’ll meet you in an hour and a half. I hope that didn’t sprain your tongue too much. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
5/6/2008 3:05:15 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, April 08, 2008
i.e. vs. e.g.
Q: What's the difference between "i.e." and "e.g."? I thought they were interchangeable, but I was told that this isn't the case. Can you please explain?—Claire CollordA: I used to have the most difficult time remembering this rule. After all, both of these terms are derived from Latin and I didn't take Latin in school—I opted for the Spanish class that was taught by an exceptionally attractive maestra (which may have explained the C-). But with a little help from a college friend, I was able to burn the i.e./e.g. grammatical law into my brain once and for all. The rough translation is as follows: i.e. means "that is." (id est) e.g. means "for example." (exempli gratia) The difference here is that i.e. is exclusive while e.g. is a sample. They are not interchangeable because they change the meaning of the sentence. And if you substitute in the definitions, it'll help you determine which letter-combination you need. Let's take these examples: I like summer sports (e.g., baseball, softball, ultimate Frisbee). The sports mentioned (baseball, softball, ultimate Frisbee) represent a few of the summer sports that I like, but aren't the only ones I enjoy (I also like fishing, sand volleyball and golf). I'm just offering some examples. If you read this sentence as "I like summer sports ( for example, baseball, softball, ultimate Frisbee)" you see what I mean. So the correct choice is e.g. On the other hand, Sophie likes winter sports, i.e., skiing and hockey. This sentence indicates that Sophie likes the specific winter sports skiing and hockey, but not necessarily any other winter sports. You can read this sentence: Sophie likes winter sports, that is, skiing and hockey. So the choice here is i.e. To burn these definitions into your memory and help remind you which letter-abbreviation pairs with which definition, you can follow this mnemonic device a college friend once taught me: i.e. is "in essence" while e.g. is "eggs sample." "Eggs sample" may make me laugh each time I think about it, but I never forget the rule. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
4/8/2008 3:20:42 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Lay vs. Lie (vs. Laid)
Q: Lay, lie, laid—when do you use each? —Annemarie ValianA: Don’t forget about “lain,” my friend! All these verbs have two things in common: They begin with the letter “L” and confuse the bejeezus out of many people. Let’s give this a shot. Lay and lie are both present-tense verbs, but they don’t mean quite the same thing. Lay means to put or set something down, so if the subject is acting on an object, it’s “lay.” For example, I lay down the book. You, the subject, set down the book, the object. Lie, on the other hand, is defined as, “to be, to stay or to assume rest in a horizontal position,” so the subject is the one doing the lying— I lie down to sleep or When I pick up a copy of my favorite magazine, Writer’s Digest, I lie down to take in all its great information. In both these cases, you, the subject, are setting yourself down. Are you with me so far? In the past tense, “lay” becomes “laid” ( I laid down the law and told her it was inappropriate for her to pick her nose) and “lie” becomes “lay” ( She lay down for a nap that afternoon and picked her nose anyway). Yes, “lay” is also the past tense of “lie.” And the confusion doesn’t end there. To throw you for another loop, “laid” is also the past participle form of “lay.” So, when helping verbs are involved, “lay” becomes “laid” and “lie” becomes “lain.” Grandma had laid the chicken in the oven earlier this morning. The chicken had lain there all day until it was cooked all the way through and ready for us to eat. Remember: Lay and laid both mean to set something down, while lie, lay and lain all mean the subject is setting itself down. And now, I lay this question to rest.
Infinitive Definition Present Past Past Participle Present Participle
to lay to put or place lay(s) laid laid laying something down to lie to rest or recline lie(s) lay lain lying Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
1/22/2008 11:05:44 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007
When Do I Spell Out Numbers?
Q: Sometimes I see numbers spelled out (nine) and at other times I see them in numeric form (9). Which is correct?—Kevin Tracy A: Most writers—including me—took on this artistic profession for three reasons: We’re creative, we love to read and, most important, we want to avoid numbers at all costs. Yet somehow, even in writing, numbers have found a way to sneak back into our lives. There are several rules of thought on how to handle writing numbers, but the most common is pretty simple. Spell out numbers under 10 (zero through nine), and use the numeric symbols for numbers 10 and up. I bought eight candy bars from the vending machine. I average eating 29 candy bars per month. There are some exceptions to the rule. For example, spell out all numbers that begin a sentence. Forty-seven-thousand contestants were turned down for “American Idol.” Eleven were selected. Of course, there’s an exception to the exception: Don’t spell out calendar years, even at the front end of a sentence. 1997 was the year I met my wife. And, if you don’t feel like writing those long, awkward-looking numbers, just recast the sentence. American Idol turned down 47,000 contestants. I met my wife in the magical year of 1997. Also, there are other instances where the under-10/over-10 rule doesn’t apply. Always use figures for ages of people (“He’s 9 years old”), dates (February 14), monetary amounts ($8), percentages (14 percent) and ratios (2-to-1). Again, this is a style issue and other sources may suggest different ways of handling numbers. So please, no hate mail. And let’s agree not to talk about numbers for the rest of the day—they make my head hurt. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Formatting | Grammar
11/13/2007 1:15:30 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Hone vs. Home
Q: My niece is always misusing the word “hone” when she should be using “home.” I know the difference, but have a tough time explaining it to her. Can you explain this rule for us? —Carol M.A: No problem at all, Carol. This is a mistake people make all the time. Often people misuse the word “hone” by placing it in sentences where it doesn’t belong, but it’s a simple confusion that can be cleared up by understanding its definition. The verb “hone” means “to sharpen or make more acute,” as in honing a talent. Alfred honed his negotiation skills to buy a new car at a very reasonable price. I hone my abs by doing 100 sit-ups a day. Generally, people drop it into sentences where they should use “home.” In verb form, “home” (as in “to home in on”) means “to move or be aimed toward a destination or target with great accuracy.” The leftfielder homed in on the fly ball. “Forget about the abs!” I said as I homed in on a mouth-watering candy bar. As a simple rule of thumb, if you write the sentence and need the phrase “in on” after the verb, it’s most likely “home.” If not, you probably need to use “hone.” Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
10/30/2007 9:00:25 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Ensure vs. Insure
Q: Are “ensure” and “insure” interchangeable?—Anonymous
A: Some stylebooks say yes, and some say no. Are you any less confused? These two words are often used in place of each other, but WD’s style separates them. WD—and many other publications—uses “insure” only when referring to financial insurance policies. After signing a contract with a professional baseball team, Jack decided to insure his pitching arm for $1 million. When the meaning is “to make certain,” WD sticks with “ensure.” It’s my job to ensure that you don’t misuse terms like these. There are some newspapers and magazines, such as The New York Times and The New Yorker, that still use “insure” in both instances, but it’s fairly archaic to do so. Most publications differentiate the two. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
10/9/2007 11:15:46 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Can I Use Contractions in my Writing?
Q: I know that grammatically we shouldn’t use contractions at all unless it’s‑in speech, but I see that many nonfiction bestselling authors use them. What are the current guidelines for their use?—HenryA: Contractions aren’t wrong—they’re just less formal than the expanded forms. Using them depends on your audience. They’re far more acceptable today than they were when your grandpa was just a dad, and there’s nothing wrong with contractions in the right context. And sometimes there can be a good deal wrong without them. As you can probably see, Writer’s Digest uses them quite frequently. Our style is to employ conjunctions when they flow naturally and make the sentence smoother. If you’re writing a college term paper or a professional study, however, you should probably avoid them. As for novels, short stories and other forms of writing where your own style is required, it’s up to you whether you can, cannot or can’t use them. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
9/4/2007 2:05:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, July 23, 2007
Affect vs. Effect
Q: Could you share some insight on the proper usage of the words “affect” and Effect”?—Charlene ClarkA: The misuse of the words “affect” and “effect” is such an epidemic that some folks are considering assembling regional support groups to deal with the problem. But while the words are often used incorrectly, they aren’t as tough to keep straight as you may think. “Affect” is generally used as a verb: A affects B. The eye-patch affected my vision. In this sentence, the eye-patch (A) influenced my vision (B). “Effect,” on the other hand, is almost exclusively used as a noun: A had an effect on B. Acting like a pirate has had a negative effect on my social life.So the basic rule of thumb is that “affect” is almost always a verb and “effect” is usually a noun. There are deviations from this, but when in doubt, stick to the rule. If you need help remembering, think of this mnemonic device: The action is affect, the end result is effect.
Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Friday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
7/23/2007 3:26:28 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, April 13, 2007
Because, Because, Because
Q: My grammar school teachers always told me that it was wrong to start a sentence with the word “because,” but I commonly see it in books today. What’s the rule?—Roger Allen A: Grammar teachers across the U.S., please don’t hate me, as I’m about to expose the awful truth you’ve been trying to hide for years: It’s not poor grammar to start a sentence with “because.” That’s right, there’s no rule or law in grammar books that denies you the right to start a sentence with this conjunction. A sentence such as, Because I needed money, I sold my body to science, is not only grammatically correct, it’s also more effective than if it were the other way around ( I sold my body to science because I needed the money). So why do teachers parade this nonexistent rule to our youth? They want to prevent the future scholars from writing in fragments, and kids have a tendency to write incomplete sentences like Because I can or Because he’s smelly. Instead of telling kids that they can’t start a sentence with “because,” it’d be more proper to make them complete their sentences. But I know how difficult it is to get kids to complete anything. Take care of yourself and your writing, Brian A. Klems Brian A. Klems is the associate editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Friday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
4/13/2007 1:10:19 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Everyday Versus Every Day
Q: Sometimes I see “everyday” as one word and sometimes I see it as two (“every day”). Are both correct? Is there a difference? —Karen S.A: The English language is tricky sometimes, and this instance is a perfect example—yes both “everyday” and “every day” are correct, but they can’t be used interchangeably. While they ultimately mean the same thing, they have different functions. “Everyday” is an adjective that describes an object. My work clothes are separate from my everyday clothes. Around our office, fax-machine meltdowns are an everyday event. “Every day” is an adverbial phrase (where “every” is actually acting as an adjective describing “day”). I start every day by giving my wife a kiss. Kevin Alexander watches “The View” every day. If you’re still in doubt, use this little trick to keep it straight: Try to substitute “each and every day” in the place of the “everyday/every day” in question. If it works, go with two words. If not, it’s one word. Take care of yourself and your writing, Brian A. KlemsHave a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Grammar
3/6/2007 9:41:49 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
|