|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (1) |
| October, 2009 (2) |
| September, 2009 (3) |
| August, 2009 (3) |
| July, 2009 (3) |
| June, 2009 (4) |
| May, 2009 (3) |
| April, 2009 (3) |
| March, 2009 (3) |
| February, 2009 (4) |
| January, 2009 (4) |
| December, 2008 (1) |
| November, 2008 (4) |
| October, 2008 (2) |
| September, 2008 (3) |
| August, 2008 (4) |
| July, 2008 (4) |
| June, 2008 (3) |
| May, 2008 (4) |
| April, 2008 (5) |
| March, 2008 (4) |
| February, 2008 (4) |
| January, 2008 (5) |
| December, 2007 (3) |
| November, 2007 (5) |
| October, 2007 (4) |
| September, 2007 (4) |
| August, 2007 (4) |
| July, 2007 (3) |
| June, 2007 (4) |
| May, 2007 (4) |
| April, 2007 (3) |
| March, 2007 (3) |
| February, 2007 (1) |
|
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, August 18, 2009
UPDATED: Can You Write the Sequel to Someone Else's Book? NOTE TO READERS: AFTER WRITING THIS Q&Q I READ A COPYRIGHT LAW THAT DIDN'T JIVE WITH MY ANSWER, SO I CONTACTED AN ATTORNEY TO SET THINGS STRAIGHT. GLAD I DID, BECAUSE I WAS OFF. AFTER SOME DIGGING WE FOUND THAT THE GREAT GATSBY WILL ENTER THE PUBLIC DOMAIN IN 2020, NOT 2010 AS I ORIGINALLY STATED. I'VE UPDATED THE ANSWER BELOW.
Q: Do I need permission to write a sequel to a famous book (in my case, The Great Gatsby) or can I just write and sell it? —Becky B.
Q: For all books that fall under copyright protection, yes, you need to be granted permission by the copyright holder. The holder is typically the author, the author's family or the publisher of the book. Without attaining the rights, you can't sell/publish a sequel. Period.
(Wow, did I just pull out the single-word sentence for emphasis? I certainly did, so I must be serious!)
That's the bad news. The good news for all who want to write sequels to their favorite books is that thousands of old books have had their copyrights expire. It's why Gregory Maguire had no problem peeling away at The Wizard of Oz (public domain since 1956) to produce Wicked and Son of a Witch. And John Gardner didn't need permission from anyone to write his Beowulf interpretation, Grendel (public domain since, well, before any of us were born).
To know when a copyright expires, you need to understand the rules established by the U.S. Copyright Office (which are very confusing, so I’ll try to sum up). Last I checked, work created before January 1, 1978, has a copyright life of 95 years from publication or 120 years from the work’s creation—whichever comes first. If it were published in 1978 or after, and the author is named and registers with the copyright office (whether it’s his real name or a pseudonym), the copyright term for the work is the author’s life plus 70 years.
Now, onto your real conundrum: Is The Great Gatsby part of the public domain? Gatsby was penned by F. Scott Fitzgerald and published in 1925. Because it was published before that magical year of 1978, the copyright won’t expire until 95 years after it was published. And, if my math is correct (which it usually isn’t, so I double-checked with my friendly solar-powered calculator), The Great Gatsby will become part of the public domain in 2020. So you’ll have to hold off a few more years to sell your sequel.
Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwmedia.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line.
Looking for more?
Copyrights | Legal Questions | Publishing
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:01:24 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, August 11, 2009
What is a Kill Fee?
Q: I got a contract for a magazine story that I’m writing, and it makes reference to a "kill fee." What is a kill fee and why would a publisher and/or writer use one?—FrankA: A kill fee what you get if your editor decides not to buy your story after all. For example, say you were contracted to write “Don’t Squash ‘em,” a story about spiders for the National Bug Lovers Magazine. The editor agreed to pay you $1,000 for the piece. You send in the completed work, and the editor reads it over but feels your depiction of the little critters is too far off base for the message of the magazine. He also determines that a revise or edit won’t fix the problems with the piece. You, on the other hand, have done a lot of the work and feel you deserve to get your check. This is where the kill fee comes into play. Most contracts will state a percentage the editor will pay you if the story doesn’t run ( Writer’s Digest pays 25% of the original agreed-upon amount). Once your story is officially killed, all rights to your piece revert back to you and you can try to sell it somewhere else. Maybe Insect Today will love your story. There are any number of reasons why an article will get killed—it doesn’t fit the editorial focus of the magazine, something changes in the world and it negates the timeliness of the article, etc. Don’t take it personally. But go back and look at the original agreement and any comments the editor has supplied, and see what you can learn from the experience. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Legal Questions | Publishing
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:47:10 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 28, 2009
How Do You Regain Copyrights to Pieces You've Sold? Q: About 20 years ago, I sold a short story to a magazine. One line in my contract stated the payment was for “full rights” and another said, “On acceptance of this payment, the author transfers the copyright interest to … .” Does this mean I can’t sell the story ever again, even as a reprint? What if the magazine is no longer published?—P.A.‑Humphrey
A: Selling full rights to your work is like selling your car—once the contract is signed, you have no rights to the piece and can’t sell it again. Works created 20 years ago are protected for the life of the author plus 70 years, so the new owner has that copyright protection.
According to our legal expert Amy Cook, even if a magazine is defunct, someone, somewhere, still owns the copyright to your piece. If you want to sell that article again, you’ll need to get the rights back.
“Even if the company went out of business, copyrights are assets that can be bought and sold; they don’t just disappear,” Cook says. “However, if you can find out who currently controls the copyright, that person may be perfectly willing to transfer the rights back to you.”
Cook also notes that there’s a
little-known loophole in the Copyright Act that says authors may terminate their copyright grants after 35 years (though it doesn’t apply to works-for-hire or copyrights transferred in wills). But this loophole still requires you to contact the existing copyright holder and inform her that you’re exercising the clause. It’s important to put it in writing. And if you’re doing this, I suggest consulting a lawyer first.
Your other option is to change the story to make it a new work. There’s no real formula when it comes to creating a new piece out of old material. It’s important to know that you can use the same idea, but the work can’t be “substantially similar” to the original piece. How similar is “substantially similar”? That’s up to the judge—if it ever comes to that.
Brian A. Klems is the online community editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life.
Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:28:30 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, June 02, 2009
Where Can Authors Find Contract Forms? Q: My co-author and I have been asked to provide a collaboration agreement to our agent.‑ Where can‑we find a template for creating this document?—Michele
A: Templates for author contracts can be found in Tad Crawford’s Business and Legal Forms for Authors and Self-Publishers (Allworth Press). It’s a great resource for finding all the legal forms an author could need, including a co-authoring contract. The book comes with a CD for your computer that has all the forms on it. Plus, by reading over the other contracts available, you’ll have a better sense of all the rights/topics you and your writing partner need to discuss.
Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life.
Business | Legal Questions | Publishing | Self-Publishing
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 6:34:43 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Is It OK to Write a Fictional Story About a Historical Character?
Q: Is it OK to write a fictional story about a historical character like Paul Revere or John Hancock? —CharlesA: The answer to that question is the same as the answer to this one: Is Brian A. Klems breathtakingly handsome? In case you hesitated, the correct answer is yes. Capital Y-E-S. (Also, when you hesitated, I died a little inside). OK, so maybe the handsome thing is debatable, but legal use of historical characters isn't. According to WD's legal guru (and close friend) Amy Cook, writing about historical people is perfectly fine and won't put you in any legal danger. "You can write about historical people because the two main legal areas you need to worry about when writing about real people—defamation of character and invasion of privacy—only apply to living people," Cook says. "The deceased's heirs cannot sue under those causes of action either." Now you may occasionally come across the term "right of publicity," which famous people do continue to have after death (and is a property right owned by their heirs). However, says Cook, this usually is a concern when people use famous dead people's images or voices—that kind of thing—for commercial use, and courts have found that books are not commercial uses for right-of-publicity claims. So there you have it, right from the lips of our legal expert. I also contacted our handsome expert, WD Editor Jessica Strawser, to help solve question number two, but she has yet to respond. I'm starting to think I should be concerned. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Legal Questions
Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:24:23 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 10, 2009
How Do I Copyright My Manuscript?
Q: I recently finished a novel and want to know what I can do to have it copyrighted. Is there a special process? –Sylvia R.A: Whenever you put something in a tangible format—written on paper, typed on computer, chiseled on stone tablets—it's copyrighted and protected under U.S. copyright law. No tricks. No magic. It's as simple as that. Of course, if someone steals your work and presents it as his own, the burden of proof falls on you to show that you created it first (and own the copyright). This, as you can image, can be tricky. To give yourself better protection you can also officially register your work with the United States Copyright Office. The downside is it'll cost you roughly $35-45 per manuscript. The upside is that if anyone steals your work, you'll not only have proof of copyright ownership, but also be able to sue for more money and damages. Now I'm not suggesting you officially register every story you've ever written, as that can get costly—that decision is up to you. But it's certainly worth considering for any manuscript of great length and value to you. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, February 10, 2009 6:12:47 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Tax Time: Is Your Writing Career a Business?
Q: I made some money last year through my writing. As tax time rolls around, I'm wondering: How much money do I have to earn before I have to declare myself as a business? –Alice H.A: There is no set dollar amount that mandates you to declare your writing income as a business. In fact, you can consider it a hobby if you like. But all income earned from your writing (no matter how you classify it—business, hobby, grown from magical tree) is taxable and must be reported to the IRS. The decision to declare your writing career/income as a business is really up to you. There are advantages to this, like tax deductions for your writing space, office equipment, phone charges, website charges, etc., and it's a good way to track your earnings and expenses year after year. Plus, it's emotionally gratifying to elevate yourself from enthusiast to professional writer. And you can print business cards to prove it (which, by the way, is also tax deductible). Of course, if you make little or no money from writing, it's generally better to classify it as a hobby. You get fewer deductions, but then you don't have to waste too much time or energy filling out a Schedule C or the 1040 long form (both of which are required for business income). If tax time rolls and you're still unsure where you fall on the line, consider this: If you're actively profiting (or trying to profit) from your writing, you're a business. If you're not concerned with profits and are in it for the love of writing, you're writing as a hobby. Either way, it's probably wise to consult an accountant. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Legal Questions | Taxes
Tuesday, January 27, 2009 6:23:49 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 02, 2008
Can You Copyright an Idea?
Q: I have a fantastic idea for a book and I want to protect my idea from someone else copying it. What steps should a person take in order to protect an idea until it comes into print? –Brian
A: I hate to break the bad news, but you can't copyright an idea. Nobody can. Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act specifically states: "In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated or embodied in such work." So if copyright law doesn't protect an idea, what exactly does it protect? Copyrights cover "original works of authorship" that the author fixes in a tangible form (written on paper, typed on computer, scribbled by crayon on a napkin, etc.). In other words, it protects the specifics of your book after it's written. No one can steal, reprint or profit from your work without your consent. Though, no matter how hard you try, you can't safeguard the idea behind your story. Think about it like this: No one directly copied William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet word-for-word and slapped their name on it, but they have used his idea—a love story about two young people from rival families— over and over again. West Side Story fits the bill (two lovers from rival gangs). Even Disney's High School Musical has the same plot (rival high school cliques). Now before all you overachievers point out that Shakespeare's work has out-lived its copyright protection and is now part of the public domain, remember this: both West Side Story and High School Musical are copyrighted, so no one can steal significant details from them. But, much like your idea, they can't stop others from using the basic concept. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:02:44 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Are E-Mails Copyrighted?
Q: I’m working on a book that includes several passages from e-mail messages I’ve received—stories, poems, quotes, etc. What obligations do I have when it comes to using the e-mails? Also, is it OK to get anecdotes (relevant experiences for nonfiction article topics) from people online through chat rooms and bulletin boards?—AnonymousA: According to our legal expert, Amy Cook, original stories, poems and quotes are all copyrighted materials, whether they exist on a piece of paper or a computer screen. If you don’t get permission from the people who hold the rights, then you’re stealing their material. “E-mails are stored—fleetingly or permanently—on computers, so they meet the copyright law’s requirement to be ‘fixed in any tangible medium of expression,’ ” Cook says.‑“If you don’t know who the authors are and don’t think you can find out, don’t use them.” Using text from a chat room is risky—it’s hard to determine whether comments made by someone using a screen name are truthful. You don’t know if the person on the other end of the chat is a 43-year-old woman with a background in your topic or an 11-year-old boy repeating something he heard on “Dr. Phil.” Cook suggests trying to have people contact you privately to be interviewed. “When using a chat room or bulletin board, honesty is the best policy—say something like, ‘I’m gathering research for a book/article on X. Would anyone care to comment on this issue for inclusion in my piece?’ ” she says. “This way, responders understand that their comments may be made public, and you won’t invade their expectation of privacy.” Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Legal Questions
Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:09:52 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Can You Use a Someone Else's Character in Your Book?
Q: Can I use a minor yet intriguing character from a famous work as the protagonist of my novel? I know it’s been done with novels like Wide Sargasso Sea, using Mrs. Rochester from Jane Eyre, but would a secondary character from a novel published before 1950 (yet still in print) also be allowed?—AnonymousA: Characters are protected by copyright as long as they’re original and well-defined—the traits that probably make them desirable to use in your own work. “If a character has a distinctive name and well-defined personality—whether it’s Harry Potter or his sidekicks Hermione Granger or Ron Weasley—they belong to the copyright holder, and you can’t use them without permission,” says our legal expert Amy Cook. “Character names can even become well-known enough to warrant trademark protection.” Now, just because you can’t use someone else’s work doesn’t mean you can’t be inspired by it. And if the character has a rather common name and isn’t particularly fleshed out, she’s up for grabs (e.g., a perky young college student named Jennifer who used to baby-sit the main character and doesn’t play much of a role in the book). One other avenue that authors are taking is “fan fiction.” Fan fiction writers take characters and settings from other works and build their own stories around them and, generally, share them online for free. Technically, it’s still copyright infringement. But some authors don’t mind this and, in fact, are flattered—especially if it’s not for profit. Some other creators, however, like horror author Anne Rice, simply won’t stand for their characters and fantasy worlds to be used by others. It’s going to depend on the litigiousness of the creator. FUN NOTE: Bestselling authors Steve Berry, James Rollins and Brad Thor have been known to write each other's characters into their stories (then again, they are all friends). They talk about it here in this video. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:15:25 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 01, 2008
What's Considered Fair Use and What Isn't?
Q: Is it necessary to ask permission to reprint an article if the reprint is used in a strictly academic setting?—AnonymousA: Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107 of the U.S. code states that “the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies … for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” But not all material is protected for your free use. There are provisions, and our legal expert Amy Cook says the writer must weigh some factors before considering the work fair game. “If an article on a hot issue was published, and you distribute it to a large class without permission—ostensibly to examine the writing style—those students wouldn’t go buy the magazine,” Cook says, and the magazine would lose sales. “You can’t destroy the market value for the original.” Courts also take into account whether the original work is more factual (which more readily falls into a fair use) or if it’s more creative (less likely to be a fair use). The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work can come into question, too; so taking an entire article is risky. “The bottom line is that writers or users should take only the smallest amount they need to comment on it,” she says. “The mere fact that it’s an academic use doesn’t automatically protect you. If in doubt, simply get permission.” Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:33:10 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, June 24, 2008
What Are First Serial Rights (or FNASR)?
Q: When working out a contract with a magazine, what are first serial rights?—Anonymous A: When you sell first serial rights to a newspaper, magazine or periodical for a piece of work you’ve written, that media outlet has the right to be the first place to publish the article/story/ poem. After the piece runs, you’re free to resell it to another medium or to package a collection of your work into a book. Rights can be sold geographic-ally, as well. It’s not uncommon to see article submissions with “offering first North American serial rights (FNASR)” written in the top, right corner of the first page. This limits the buyer’s rights and gives you the opportunity to sell the article in other locations outside the U.S. and Canada—such as England, Russia or Madagascar. Reprints of your work that previously appeared in another publication are considered second serial rights. These rights are nonexclusive, meaning the author can sell the piece to many publications at the same time. In the online world, you can sell the electronic rights to your piece. These rights aren’t as clear. While they cover most of the same rules as first serial rights, the ever-evolving technology can cause some discrepancies between yourself and the publisher—like whether it can archive your work, place it in a database and let young punks download it to their PCs. This process is the least defined, and you may want to specify each right you license to the buyer. Other rights to consider are simultaneous rights (giving you the ability to sell work to publications that don’t have overlapping circulations) and all rights (which means you sell all the rights to your work to the buyer, and you never get another dime for the piece, no matter how many times they publish it). And remember, it never hurts to have someone familiar with freelancer contracts glance over your contract before you sign. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Copyrights | Dealing with Editors | Legal Questions
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:20:28 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Can You Copyright a Pseudonym?
Q: Do I need to get a copyright for a pseudonym, or will a copyright for the book under my chosen pen name be sufficient?—Al de Araujo A: The name H.G. Wells isn’t copyrighted. Neither is Michael Crichton. Why? Under U.S. law you can’t copyright a name, real or fictitious. Copyrights protect authorship, such as short stories, poems or novels. You can register a manuscript under a pen name at the copyright office ( www.copyright.gov ). You’ll have to provide some information, including your real address. But if you really want to keep your true identity under wraps, set up a post office box and have information from the office sent there. It’s important to get your pen name on record so the Copyright Office can acknowledge the proper life span of the copyright. Work created by authors not identified by the Copyright Office have a copyright life of only 95 years from publication or 120 years from the work’s creation—whichever comes first. If a writer identifies herself to the copyright office and registers her pen name, the copyright term for the work is the author’s life plus 70 years. Which means if I get hit by a bus tomorrow my work is still protected until 2078. It’s also important to check with the office first and do online searches to avoid using names of real people or names that have already been taken by other authors. While you can’t copyright a name, you can get sued for identity theft. Also, publishers can get pretty angry if you try to pass yourself off as someone famous like J.K. Rowling or Dean Koontz. Stick with something unique. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:59:25 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Can I Use Song Lyrics in my Manuscript?
Q: What are the legal ramifications of reproducing song lyrics in a manuscript? If permission from each copyright holder is necessary, what’s the best way to secure these permissions? Also, can I use a song title as the title of my book?—June YoungbloodA: Song lyrics are copyrighted, which means you need permission to use them. According to our legal expert Amy Cook, there isn’t any specific law about how much you can take under fair use, but it’s common for the music industry to say you need permission for even one line of a song. “The music industry is pretty vigilant about song lyrics,” Cook says. “This is especially true if you’re using the lyrics in a novel to progress the story or add atmosphere. If you’re a music critic reviewing a CD, you have more leeway under fair use.” One way you can check to see if the song is still under copyright protection is to visit www.copyright.gov. This online site lists all copyright records dating back to 1978. For anything before that, you’ll need to contact the U.S. Copyright Office and may have to pay to have the records checked for you. Another way to find the owner of the copyrights is to contact the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) or Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI). These two major music performance rights organizations don’t grant permission, but they can help you find the publisher of the song you’re looking to use. Once you find the rights owner, you must ask for his permission. He could offer you the rights for free, completely deny you the rights or ask you to rename your dog after him. The price is completely up to the music publisher. “As a practical matter, you don’t need to worry about getting permissions until your work is going to be published,” Cook says. “And your publisher may help you in securing permissions. Most publishers provide their authors with their permission guidelines and forms.” As for song titles, however, titles of any kind (book, song) aren’t copyrightable. But they occasionally can be subject to trademark or unfair competition laws. “If you used a really famous song title or part of a song as a title —say, ‘Yellow Submarine’— that’s so closely tied to a specific group (or artists), then you’d probably get a letter from their lawyers,” Cook says. Copyrights | Legal Questions
Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:01:33 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Why Do Authors Use Pseudonyms?
Q: Why do authors use pseudonyms?—AnonymousA: Authors write under pseudonyms, or pen names, for a variety of reasons. Established authors will do it to cross genres and keep from aggravating their fan bases. Wouldn’t you be a bit ticked off if you bought Stephen King’s next book expecting blood, guts and hair-raising intensity, only to find out it’s a weepy romance novel? King may choose to publish under a different name so he doesn’t disappoint his die-hard horror fans. Another reason for using a pen name is to switch publishers. When an author is under contract, her publisher may own the rights to any upcoming work under her name. Often authors will take up a new name so they can shop around their work while avoiding legal problems (be sure to read your contract closely, though, because some prohibit this). But one of the most common reasons authors write under aliases is because their earlier works bombed. If a writer didn’t make money for the publisher the first time, he’s not likely to get a second chance—publishers would prefer to give someone new a shot. Under a pen name, a writer can be reborn. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Legal Questions | Publishing
Tuesday, April 29, 2008 5:51:11 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, April 22, 2008
What is a Literary Executor?
Q: I was recently approached by one of my relatives (my father's cousin), who asked if I would be her literary executor. I don't really know what this means and thought you might be able to shed some light on the subject. Do you know what this might entail?—AnonymousA: Often people choose executors of their will to carry out their wishes and oversee the handling/distribution of their estate. A "literary executor," as defined by Merriam-Webster.com, is a person entrusted with the management of the papers and unpublished works of a deceased author. In other words, a literary executor specifically handles all your literary property, including overseeing your copyrights, contracts with publishers, outstanding royalties, etc. While you can designate anyone to be your literary executor—your child, your neighbor, your old English sheepdog whom you affectionately call "Tots"—it's best to assign it to someone who knows a thing or two about publishing and copyrights. After all, this person will be in charge of all your published and unpublished writings. You want to be certain that your work is handled with care, so the money generated goes to your heirs and favorite charities instead of being "donated" to the bottom line of the publishing houses (unless, of course, you want the publishers to have all your money). So where do you find someone with the wherewithal to handle your posthumous publishing affairs? If you have an agent, start with him. If he's 20 years your senior, a heavy smoker and likely to pass on long before you, his agency should be able to handle it. Just ask them how to go about setting it up. If you don't have an agent, turn to a friend who has publishing experience. The more knowledgeable the person is with rights, the better off your literary estate will be. And if both of those options are dead ends, select the family member you trust the most to contact/contract the proper professionals (e.g. lawyers, agents, editors, etc.) as needed. For a more in-depth breakdown on the subject, you can read Copylaw.com's " Final Drafts: Selecting a Literary Executor" by Lloyd Jassin and Ronald Finkelstein. It's filled with great tips and advice to make sure that the value of your writings stay intact after you type that last word and head to the big writer's lounge in the sky. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Legal Questions | Publishing
Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:07:02 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Are You Using Trademarked Words in Your Writing?
Q: An editor once pointed out that I was using brand names instead of the generic equivalent. How am I to know which words have been trademarked and which aren't?—AnonymousA: When your character cuts his hand, does he cover it with an adhesive bandage or a Band-Aid? Does his mother use a hand-held vacuum cleaner or a DustBuster? And be sure to blow your protagonist’s nose with a tissue, not a Kleenex. Many generic-sounding words and phrases are actually trademarked brand names. Some are so common that it can be difficult to tell the difference without looking them up. And the list continually grows, as terms like Netflix and Google are used more generically (e.g. I google my name at least once a week). Trademarked words aren’t off-limits for writers, but be sure to use them correctly—double-check the spelling, use proper capitalization and refrain from writing out specific product names when you’re using it as a generalized term. And if you want to know which words are legally restricted, you can visit the International Trademark Association (inta.org). They offer an updated (though not complete) list of most trademarked words and phrases. Several words on INTA’s list that aren’t obvious trademarks include: Trademark Generic term Bubble Wrap (cellular cushioning packaging material) Cheez Whiz (processed cheese spread) Cineplex (multi-auditorium movie theaters) Crock-Pot (electric cooking appliance) Febreze (fabric deodorizer) Frisbee (toy flying saucer) Hula-Hoop (plastic toy hoops) Jacuzzi (therapeutic whirlpool baths) Jell-O (gelatin, pudding) La-Z-Boy (chairs and ottomans) Silly Putty (modeling clay) Q-Tips (cotton swabs) Xerox (photocopiers, printers, copiers, scanners) Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Legal Questions
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:37:12 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 29, 2008
What's the Average Cost to Have a Lawyer Look Over Your Book Contract?
Q: I'm in the middle of the submission process to agents. Obviously I'm hoping at least one will want to represent me, but I'm also deathly afraid of making the wrong commitment with the wrong agent (in other words, signing a bad contract). Having a lawyer look over a contract is good advice, but I also fear that kind of expense. Do you know what the average cost would be to have a lawyer look over a contract and what kind of lawyer would you go to? —Anonymous A: According to WD's legal expert, Amy Cook, if you do decide to hire a lawyer for an agent or publishing contract, be sure that person has experience with publishing law, or, at the very least, intellectual property law. A lawyer who practices in other fields may offer some basic feedback on your contract, but he won't know the ins and outs and is unlikely to understand details that are important to your financial future. Think of it this way: You wouldn't seek the advice of a poet on how to improve and sell your screenplay, right? "Publishing contracts are very industry specific, so find someone who knows how to properly handle them," Cook says. "You can find a lawyer who fits this bill through your local bar association. Another really great choice for writers are organizations." Several writers' organizations that offer lawyers who specialize in publishing law are Chicago's Lawyers for the Creative Arts ( www.law-arts.org), California Lawyers for the Arts ( www.calawyersforthearts.org) and New York's Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts ( www.vlany.org), among others. Any one of these groups can provide help or, at the very least, act as a starting point for you. As far as costs are concerned, hiring a lawyer to review a contract can be pricey, ranging from $300-1000 depending on the lawyer's hourly rate and the contract's complexity. It can be even pricier if you want them to actually negotiate to contract for you, falling somewhere between $500-3000. But if you contact any of the above organizations you may qualify for reduced cost (or even free) legal help. Ultimately the decision to get a lawyer's advice is up to you. It's always a good idea to have an expert review any binding legal document, but, like all other forms of security, it comes with a price. You just have to decide if it's worth it for your book. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Legal Questions
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:11:12 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Should I Get a Lawyer Before Signing with an Agent?
Q: Once an agent wants to take me on as a client and sends me a contract, do I need to have the contract looked at by a contract lawyer before I sign?—Allen Reiling
A: Yes, it would probably be wise to have a lawyer who knows a thing or two about publishing look over the contract. Most contracts vary from agent to agent, and it’s important to know exactly what agreements you make by signing.
If you don’t read the fine print or understand the legal language, months down the road you could find out that you not only gave up the right to profits from international sales but also the naming rights to your firstborn child. Contracts can be tough to follow sometimes, but without an understanding, you could essentially sign away anything.
Another thing you may consider before signing a contract is asking for a reference list of the agent’s other clients. Call and ask the clients about their experiences with the agent. If the agent refuses to give you such names, maybe that’s because he knows his clients will say things like, “He’s a bad manager” or “She mishandled my contract” or “I found him sleeping under his desk during working hours.” And that should be taken into serious consideration. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life.
Business | Legal Questions | Publishing
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:41:24 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, June 29, 2007
Will I Get Sued if I Use Real Names in my Memoir?
Q: I am writing a memoir and need to know if I can use real names in the book. I am going to write about some terrible experiences and some don’t show people in a favorable light. Can I use their names? Also, how can I be sure to protect myself from any possible litigation? --Anonymous A: Writing about real people in your life is tricky, especially if you cast them in a negative light. Once you put it into print there’s always a possibility of a lawsuit. Augusten Burroughs, rightly or wrongly, was sued by the family of his psychiatrist for Running With Scissors (the family accused him of making up events to make his book more marketable). According to legal expert (and friend of “WD”) Howard G. Zaharoff, there are two rights you must respect: disclosure and defamation. “The right to avoid disclosure of truthful but embarrassing private facts is the first right,” says Zaharoff. “For example, I am reading John Sandford's latest Prey novel, in which a well-known politician is accused of having sex with an underage woman. She offers proof that she had sex with him by describing two semicolon shaped freckles on his testicles. Unless they are relevant to an important and truthful account you need to tell, I would avoid that kind of disclosure.” OK, I’ll give you a moment to get that mental picture out of your head. But you get the point. Don’t share negative or embarrassing information unless it’s absolutely necessary to your story. It can only hurt you. Back to Zaharoff: “Second, U.S. law prohibits defamation, that is, oral or written falsehoods that hold the subject up to scorn or ridicule. Every negative statement you make about a living person must be true and, ideally, supported by evidence.” Of course, if you say something so awful about a person you will always risk a lawsuit, particularly where your only support is your word. And, Zaharoff notes, that's a costly experience even if you ultimately win, and there is no guarantee you will. So the real question is, How do you tell your story without risking any form of litigation? Disguise the names and biographical data and make sure that no one can identify the subjects from your description. Use a pseudonym if need be. And ALWAYS (it’s in all caps for a reason) talk with a knowledgeable lawyer first. A little cash now can save you a lot of cash in the future. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Friday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Legal Questions
Friday, June 29, 2007 6:57:59 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
|