# Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Should I Use The Chicago Manual of Style for my Book?
Q: In my writing I strictly follow the rules in The Chicago Manual of Style. For example, in a sentence joined with an "and," I place a comma after the last word before the "and" when the first part of the sentence is a complete sentence. I have received a rejection with the first page sent back and the editor's deletion marks are in contradiction to the rule in the Chicago Manual. Should I follow the Chicago Manual in my fiction writing or not?--Carolyn Boyles


A: According to Formatting & Submitting Your Manuscript (and editors I've spoken to at conferences), most book publishers use The Chicago Manual of Style—or some variation of it—as a formatting guide for their books. So when writing your novel or nonfiction work, it's best to follow those guidelines. But if you haven't been using The Chicago Manual of Style or an editor comes back with changes that contradict it, don't panic.

The key to writing any manuscript is to be consistent—in other words, no matter what style you are using (Chicago, AP-style, your sixth-grade English teacher's rulebook), stick with it. Publishers and editors tend to be forgiving when reading a manuscript that doesn't embrace their style, but are less forgiving when the formatting is all over the place (e.g., using a comma in a parallel sentence structure sometimes and not using it other times; italicizing book titles in the first few chapters but underlining it others.) This lack of consistency looks unprofessional and lazy—two traits that could potentially cost you a deal. To a writer it may seem like nitpicking, but to an editor it shows discipline and an author who values the craft.

Most magazine and newspaper publishers, on the other hand, use The Associated Press Stylebook and Libel Manual as a guide for their publications. Although many, like Writer's Digest, take a few liberties with it to fit their own particular house styles. So don't read too much into style edits.

It's probably wise for all writers to have both the Chicago Manual and the AP Stylebook on their bookshelves—along with maybe a good luck charm.

Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.

Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life.


Dealing with Editors | Formatting | Grammar
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:52:42 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [3] 
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:44:38 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
The questioner here speaks of a sentence joined with an "and" when the first part of the sentence is a complete sentence, but she does not describe the second part of the sentence. The Chicago Manual prescribes the comma before the "and" in a compound sentence but not before the "and" in a sentence with a compound predicate. (see sections 5.30 to 5.33, in the 14th edition).

Could it be that the editor removed the comma from a sentence with a compound predicate? In any event, I like your suggestion to be consistent in punctuation and style.

Janet Hays
Janet Hays
Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:08:01 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Commas make me despair.

No wonder.

So when I have a question on punctuation and/or grammar and consult my shelf of manuals, I could find different answers depending on which book I choose? Some books only have a couple examples of commas and others have pages and pages. It never occured to me that the rules would be different.

On my computer it asks if I want to use Chicago or AP style. But neither program seems to help with commas. Semicolons, yes. Commas no, nada.

Who would think such a small punctuation mark would cause such havoc?
Mary E. Ulrich
Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:51:06 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
My first thought was what Janet refers to--knowing the difference between a compound sentence and a compound predicate. I come upon the incorrect use of the comma with the compound predicate over and over. People are so confused about this issue.
Anne Fox
Comments are closed.
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links