<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Writer's Digest Questions and Quandaries - Reviews</title>
    <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/</link>
    <description>Questions and Quandaries Blog</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>F+W Media, Inc.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:11:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>brian.klems@fwpubs.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>brian.klems@fwpubs.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/Trackback.aspx?guid=f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/PermaLink,guid,f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/CommentView,guid,f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <b>Q: The book critic at my local newspaper mentioned in an article that she
doesn’t review self-published books. Is this common procedure? Are there any major
dailies that do?—Joyann Dwire 
<br /></b>
          <br />
A: Some newspapers won’t review self-published books simply because they’re concerned
about legal issues. Self-published books aren’t subjected to the rigorous editing
process employed by publishing companies, particularly the legal and plagiarism issues
that most concern newspapers. Publishing companies do all the legwork and guarantee
the book is original, fact-checked and libel-free—after all, their reputation is at
stake. And while you may have quadruple-checked your facts, newspapers can’t rest
their reputation on your shoulders.<br /><br />
Of course, there may be some snobbery at play at some publications, as the odds of
a newspaper being sued over a libelous book review are slimmer than Paris Hilton.
But some newspapers insist it’s a legal issue and, like it or not, they have that
right. 
<br /><br />
Not all major papers completely turn their backs on self-published books, though.
John Marshall, book critic for <i>The</i><i>Seattle Post-Intelligencer</i>, says
that while his paper is hesitant about it, the editors will review them from time
to time. “It’s true that self-published books don’t have the editorial screening that
commercial presses have,” he says. “But we’re willing to make exceptions. Often the
ones we do mention have either sold well or won awards.” 
<br /><br /><i>The Cincinnati Enquirer</i>’s book page content editor, Jim Knippenberg, takes
a similar view. “We don’t have a blanket policy,” he says. “It’s on a case-by-case
basis. If it’s a recognizable name, like a notable local person, we might review them.
In that case, often we’ll do a piece focusing more on the author than the book.”<br /><br /><i>Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of </i>Writer’s Digest<i> magazine.</i><br /><br />
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail
me at <a href="mailto:WritersDig@fwpubs.com">WritersDig@fwpubs.com</a> with “Q&amp;Q”
in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into
the writing life.<br /><br /><p></p></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/aggbug.ashx?id=f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264" />
      </body>
      <title>Will Newspapers Review Self-Published Books?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/PermaLink,guid,f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/Will+Newspapers+Review+SelfPublished+Books.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:11:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Q: The book critic at my local newspaper mentioned in an article that she
doesn’t review self-published books. Is this common procedure? Are there any major
dailies that do?—Joyann Dwire 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A: Some newspapers won’t review self-published books simply because they’re concerned
about legal issues. Self-published books aren’t subjected to the rigorous editing
process employed by publishing companies, particularly the legal and plagiarism issues
that most concern newspapers. Publishing companies do all the legwork and guarantee
the book is original, fact-checked and libel-free—after all, their reputation is at
stake. And while you may have quadruple-checked your facts, newspapers can’t rest
their reputation on your shoulders.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course, there may be some snobbery at play at some publications, as the odds of
a newspaper being sued over a libelous book review are slimmer than Paris Hilton.
But some newspapers insist it’s a legal issue and, like it or not, they have that
right. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not all major papers completely turn their backs on self-published books, though.
John Marshall, book critic for &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;Seattle Post-Intelligencer&lt;/i&gt;, says
that while his paper is hesitant about it, the editors will review them from time
to time. “It’s true that self-published books don’t have the editorial screening that
commercial presses have,” he says. “But we’re willing to make exceptions. Often the
ones we do mention have either sold well or won awards.” 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The Cincinnati Enquirer&lt;/i&gt;’s book page content editor, Jim Knippenberg, takes
a similar view. “We don’t have a blanket policy,” he says. “It’s on a case-by-case
basis. If it’s a recognizable name, like a notable local person, we might review them.
In that case, often we’ll do a piece focusing more on the author than the book.”&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of &lt;/i&gt;Writer’s Digest&lt;i&gt; magazine.&lt;/i&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail
me at &lt;a href="mailto:WritersDig@fwpubs.com"&gt;WritersDig@fwpubs.com&lt;/a&gt; with “Q&amp;amp;Q”
in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into
the writing life.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/aggbug.ashx?id=f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/CommentView,guid,f5d1e8e2-c170-4511-9792-739f8c4dc264.aspx</comments>
      <category>Marketing</category>
      <category>Publishing</category>
      <category>Reviews</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>