Thursday, March 29, 2007
How Hollywood Handles Book Options
Q: I'm curious to know how a novel gets optioned for a movie. What's the process and, as an author, what can one expect?—Marlon Sanders

A: The first step in this process, of course, is to write an amazing novel. That’s how Dan Brown (The Da Vinci Code) did it. That’s how Christopher Paolini (Eragon) did it. And that’s how you’re going to do it.

Let’s say that your book is brilliant and is quickly gobbled up by a publishing agent. After he sells it to a publisher, he’ll typically turn around and call another agent who specializes in selling movie and television rights. This agent (whom I’ll call a Hollywood agent to differentiate the two) will read your book and decide whether it has blockbuster potential or would be better served holding up the short leg of his dining room table.
 
“If I decide it’s something I would like to get behind, I call the agent back and say, ‘I like this book, I really see it as a feature film, a TV movie or a TV series,’” says 15-year industry veteran Steve Fisher, who’s currently an agent for APA Literary Agency in Los Angeles. “If they’re open to my vision, then I’ll take on the project and start marketing it.”

The next move is for the Hollywood agent to go after producers. Producers don’t buy your work, but they shop it to studios that do. The key here, according to Fisher, is finding a producer who is not only appropriate for your book but also well-liked enough at one particular studio to get the job done. For example, if Johnny Producer carries weight at NBC Universal, but doesn’t have nearly the connections at FOX, he’ll be asked to shop it only to NBC.  Hollywood agents may share the rights with several producers at one time, but each producer will only be allowed to solicit one specific studio.
 
“Once a studio gets behind it, someone from the studio’s business affairs department will call you and say one of two things,” Fisher says. “They’ll either make an offer or, more often than not, they’ll say, ‘What are you looking for?’”

Option prices are really all over the map—from $10,000 on the low end to seven figures and up. Occasionally bidding wars break out and help drive up the price, but not as often as you’d think. And sometimes the bidding starts so low that the “high” bid is about as impressive as the sales tax on a pair of jeans, so you (and your agent) have to decide whether it’s worth making the deal or telling Tinseltown to buzz off.

“There are a lot of misconceptions about the movie business,” Fisher says, whose duties also include managing authors’ expectations. “One of them is that virtually every book gets optioned. Another one is that studios—being businesses that spend an awful lot of money—are willing to throw around an awful lot of money in almost every case, and that’s not true. There’s something about the movie business that causes people to have outlandish preconceptions.”

The final step in the optioning process is to be patient. Things rarely happen as quickly as you’d like them to. It can be a long road to getting a book set up as a movie, and that’s just the original sale. Then it’s a much longer road to getting that movie made, with a lot of bumps (sometimes even boulders) along the way. There’s not really a good reason for that, it’s just how this business works.

“But if clients write a good product and manage their expectations and are patient,” says Fisher, “I think they may well have a positive outcome.”

Take care of yourself and your writing,
Brian A. Klems


Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line.




3/29/2007 2:35:05 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2] 
 Thursday, March 15, 2007
Looking To Get Paid

Q: I've been writing articles in one of the local papers here in our hometown, but I've never been paid for my work. The Editor/Publisher of the paper knows me personally. Do I have the right to ask for some compensation for my articles? (Thanks to avid reader Soly Paraiso for this question)


A: There are two separate issues here to consider 1) Can you ask for compensation on pieces that have already run for free and 2) Can you ask for payment on future pieces after writing for free for so long?

Luckily, my brilliant flag-football skills allow me to tackle them both with one post.

If you’ve been sending material to a local paper and haven’t asked for compensation (money, free subscription, box of Goldfish Crackers) and don’t have a contract, it’s difficult to ask for money post-publication. It’s possible the editor ran the pieces only because they were free, or maybe he was testing you out before buying down the road. In any case, I think it’s unwise to ask for money after the pieces have already been published.

Moving forward (and to answer the second part of the question), you should most definitely ask for compensation on all future writing assignments. It doesn’t matter whether the editor is your friend, neighbor or mother-in-law, she should be paying you for your services. Think of it this way: You wouldn’t expect a life insurance agent to give you insurance for free, would you? (If your answer is yes, I’d like to know the name of your agent).

Of course, writing for a local paper isn’t the most lucrative of all freelance gigs, so don’t have unrealistic expectations when negotiating. Remember, other writers—like yourself—will write for pennies (or less) early in their career to get clips, network and establish themselves in the writing community. But once you build a rapport and show you can do the job, it’s not unreasonable to ask for compensation. If the editor says no, you don’t really lose anything—considering you’ve made zero dollars so far. At best, you can earn a little something to help with a vacation fund or, better yet, a subscription to Writer’s Digest (Hey, I had to throw it in there!).

Take care of yourself and your writing,
Brian A. Klems


Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line.



3/15/2007 2:25:36 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [5] 
 Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Everyday Versus Every Day

Q: Sometimes I see “everyday” as one word and sometimes I see it as two (“every day”). Are both correct? Is there a difference? —Karen S.


A: The English language is tricky sometimes, and this instance is a perfect example—yes both “everyday” and “every day” are correct, but they can’t be used interchangeably. While they ultimately mean the same thing, they have different functions.

“Everyday” is an adjective that describes an object. My work clothes are separate from my everyday clothes. Around our office, fax-machine meltdowns are an everyday event.

“Every day” is an adverbial phrase (where “every” is actually acting as an adjective describing “day”). I start every day by giving my wife a kiss. Kevin Alexander watches “The View” every day.

If you’re still in doubt, use this little trick to keep it straight: Try to substitute “each and every day” in the place of the “everyday/every day” in question. If it works, go with two words. If not, it’s one word.

Take care of yourself and your writing,
Brian A. Klems


Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line.


Grammar
3/6/2007 9:41:49 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [7] 
 Tuesday, February 27, 2007
To Show or Not to Show Your Quotes

Hey Everyone,

Many of you are already familiar with my "Questions & Quandaries" column in the print version of Writer's Digest, but now I'm entering the blogosphere--that's right, they're crazy enough to have me blogging. Of course, I tried negotiating for a fancier office, a nicer parking spot and 3 free breakfasts a week, but they countered with, well, nothing, so I settled for having my mug at the top.

I'm hoping most of you are as excited about this as I am, as each week I'll try to give you insight into some of your grammatical, ethical and business-oriented questions. Ask me anything you want ( writersdigest@fwpubs.com ) and I'll do my best to answer as many as I can. So kick off your shoes, get comfortable and get ready to learn all the writing secrets you've always wanted to know. -- BAK

Q: Recently, a source for an article that I wrote asked if she could read it before I submitted it.  I said no.  She insisted it was her right to read any direct quotes I'd attributed to her before submitting the article. After the article was published, she was displeased that the editor had cut out some of what she considered “important information.” Did I do the right thing?—Meg Charendoff

A: Like any true ethical dilemma, there are no clear-cut rules on this subject. Some writers have no reservations about showing quotes to their interview subjects, while others think it’s one of journalism’s 10 mortal sins (somewhere between plagiarism and writing in passive voice). After all, once it’s been said, it’s fair game.

“Generally, newspaper reporters don’t allow interviewees to look over quotations and turn down requests when a source asks,” says Michael Bugeja, director of the Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication at Iowa State University. The reason behind this is that you’re catching open and honest responses the first time around; any revisions will only allow for sources to replace honest answers with lifeless rhetoric.

Freelancers working on investigative pieces, on the other hand, tend to take a slightly softer approach, says Bugeja. “Magazine writers usually have to provide a fact-check for their quotations, and so they send the transcript of the interview back for clarification.” If you decide to go this route, it’s important to preface the fact-check with this statement: Please correct any errors of omission or fact only. In fact, highlight it, underline it, send an e-card repeating it. If you don’t stress that you’re strictly looking for factual errors, you allow them to change everything. And, as any editor knows, if you give someone a chance to edit themselves, they will.

Some magazines have their own rules, so you may want to check with the one signing your paycheck. Writer’s Digest’s policy is clear: No revisiting quotes. If I’m working on a feature and unsure about a quote or particular fact, I’ll call with a follow-up question to clarify, possibly getting a new quote all together. If the interviewee wants to see his quotes, I politely say, “While I can’t share the interview transcript, I’d be happy to talk again, and allow you to add or clarify anything you want.”

The truth is, it’s completely up to you and rests solely on what you feel comfortable doing. If you want to show the quotes, show them. If you don’t, don’t. The key to remember, though, is this: You don’t have to show quotes to any of your interviewees. As long you’re willing to stand behind it, there’s no need to let them revisit their words. They said them. You heard them. Case closed.

And, if you want to avoid this all together, just record your interviews. If you have it on tape, there’s no dispute.

Take care of yourself and your writing,
Brian A. Klems



2/27/2007 11:27:44 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [14]