|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| September, 2008 (3) |
| August, 2008 (4) |
| July, 2008 (4) |
| June, 2008 (3) |
| May, 2008 (4) |
| April, 2008 (5) |
| March, 2008 (4) |
| February, 2008 (4) |
| January, 2008 (5) |
| December, 2007 (3) |
| November, 2007 (5) |
| October, 2007 (5) |
| September, 2007 (4) |
| August, 2007 (4) |
| July, 2007 (3) |
| June, 2007 (4) |
| May, 2007 (4) |
| April, 2007 (4) |
| March, 2007 (3) |
| February, 2007 (1) |
|
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, March 11, 2008
When to Use a Prologue
Q: When should a prologue be used? Is there a difference between prologues for fiction and nonfiction? —Sonya RyanA: A prologue is used when material that you want to include in the opening is out of time sequence with the rest of the story. For example, let’s say you’re writing a book about a woman getting married. While your story focuses on the year leading up to the big day, there’s a funny anecdote from her childhood about her idea of the perfect wedding that foreshadows the actual event. Because this section is seen from her perspective as a child, it’s out of sequence with the rest of the book—which is shown from an adult’s perspective—and might work better as a prologue. You can use a prologue in fiction and nonfiction, but it’s used only to explain key information that doesn’t follow the time flow of the rest of your book. So if your “prologue” doesn’t fit this criterion, either cut it or change it to Chapter 1. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Formatting
3/11/2008 11:04:36 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Where Do Writers Find Experts?
Q: I've read many articles in your magazine and others that advise freelance magazine writers to use quotes from experts on their given subject, but none of the articles tell writers how to go about doing that. Where do writers find experts? How do you approach them? How do you obtain permission to use quotes? This can be intimidating for a new writer. —Theresa Fort A: Next to cold, hard facts, experts play the most pivotal role in providing journalists with information. They hold knowledgeable opinions that can verify and validate information in the article to readers. And, while at times it may feel like experts are as hidden as Waldo, they really are easier to find than one might think. Experts are everywhere—universities, doctor’s offices, Taco Bell. But, sometimes you have to do a little digging. Don’t be afraid to hop onto Google or Yahoo and search your topic, clicking on the top 15 to 20 links that come up and keeping an eye out for anyone who could fit your needs. Another valuable tool is Profnet.com, which is a free service that connects journalists with sources. How it works: You propose your question and Profnet sends it to more than 14,000 experts, attempting to find people who know your subject. These folks are typically happy to help because it gives them more exposure. Now, when approaching an expert, it’s important to be upfront with her. In any phone or e-mail conversation, immediately state your name, your association (“I’m a Boise-based freelance writer”), your topic and deadline (if you have one). Also, let the expert know that you may use quotes from the interview in your article. If you send an e-mail, let the person know that you want to accommodate her and are willing to conduct the interview however she prefers—e-mail, phone, fax, in person (if local). Don’t be intimidated by the interviewing process. It’s much easier than it sounds. And, at worst, the expert says no and you move on—or place a curse on him. Not that I’ve ever done that … Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Interviewing | Research
3/4/2008 2:44:46 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 26, 2008
What is a Logline?
Q: I've recently decided to turn my book into a screenplay and I've read several articles that say you must have a "logline" if you want to sell your script. What's a logline?—Jennifer Bickel A: Hollywood executives are so busy that they have very little time to spend on anything, including listening to your pitch. So when you have the ear of anyone who has the power to get your script produced, it's important to keep your spiel short, simple and specific. How short? You should be able to sum up your 100-page screenplay in one sentence—you read that right: one sentence. In the industry, this is called a logline. A logline is a one-sentence summary of your script that consists of three major elements: the character, the character's goal and the antagonistic force. Here are examples of a few strong loglines (can you name the flick?): After a twister transports a lonely Kansas farm girl to a magical land, she sets out on a dangerous journey to find a wizard with the power to send her home.
I'm sure by now you've guessed that this logline belongs to The Wizard of Oz. It contains all the key elements: The character: a lonely Kansas farm girl The character's goal: find a wizard with the power to send her home The antagonistic force: sets out on a dangerous journey Here's another example: A 17th Century tale of adventure on the Caribbean Sea where the roguish yet charming Captain Jack Sparrow joins forces with a young blacksmith in a gallant attempt to rescue the Governor of England's daughter and reclaim his ship.
This one belongs to the mega-hit Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. While it's a little harder to dissect, you can still see the all the logline essentials: The character: Captain Jack Sparrow The character's goal: rescue the Governor of England's daughter and reclaim his ship The antagonistic force: adventure on the Caribbean Sea Creating a logline is also a good way to tell if your script has substance. If you spend hours and are still unable to come up with a clear sentence breaking down your movie, you have a hole that needs to be filled. Because if all the variables are there, the logline should practically write itself. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Formatting | Scriptwriting
2/26/2008 2:19:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Dealing with Late (or Missing) Payments
Q: If a writer has jumped through all the hoops (finished the assignment, submitted a proper invoice, etc.) and is not being paid, what steps should he take before resorting to having a lawyer write a letter or taking their case to small claims court, etc. —AnonymousA: Always contact the editor first (second and third) and try to work through the issue. Editors typically aren't out to stiff you. Many of them have been on the freelance side of things, too, so they know how important it is to get you your money. Sometimes it's as simple as the editor nudging the accounting department. Also, don't forget to carefully read your contract. Accounting departments differ with each publisher—some pay 30 days from the day the invoice is submitted, some pay 60 days from the publication date of your piece. Be sure that the proper time period (plus an additional two weeks) has passed before raising the red flag. And remain calm, cool and collected when you send your "checking in" e-mail. If e-mails or phone calls go unreturned, or the editor can't offer a resolution or an acceptable explanation as to why it's taking so long, then it's time to contact a lawyer—and the Better Business Bureau. Keep in mind, once you do that you've burned that bridge with that editor/publisher once and for all, and you may not want to do that. But if they weren't paying you to begin with, what did you really lose?
Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Dealing with Editors
2/19/2008 11:15:45 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Is Wikipedia an Accurate Source? (And Can Editors Alter Sourced Material?)
Q: I'm a magazine feature writer and one of my editors changed a statistic in my story that I had attributed to Wikipedia. She maintains Wikipedia is an inaccurate source. However, if I attribute my facts properly, does she have a right to alter my statistic?— Lynn M.A: If editors feel uncomfortable with an article's contents, they most certainly can (and should) make changes and alterations. They're supposed to vet and fact-check the information. It's part of the job. It's important to remember that attribution isn't meant as a safety net for reporting false facts. The point of attributing information to a source is two-fold: 1) to give credit where credit is due and 2) to give validity to the information, showing it's coming from reputable person (or organization). If your source isn't reputable, your article isn't. This brings me to Wikipedia. As journalists, we love the site because it offers an excellent starting point to our research (underline, bold, highlight and draw squiggles around the words "starting point"). With a few clicks, you can find leads on nearly anything, along with links to better articles on each subject. But you can't trust Wikipedia. It can be updated and edited by anyone; that's right, anyone—you, me, that neighbor down the street who everyone describes as "sketchy." There's no real due diligence involved to guarantee accuracy and, as a journalist, you can't accept inaccuracy. Again, that doesn't mean that the site isn't useful. Hell, I probably check it several times a day (one can never know enough about the Back to the Future trilogy). Just use it as a starting point to find more reliable sources. Your editors (and audience) will thank you for it. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Dealing with Editors | Ethics | Research
2/12/2008 1:06:38 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Will Newspapers Review Self-Published Books?
Q: The book critic at my local newspaper mentioned in an article that she doesn’t review self-published books. Is this common procedure? Are there any major dailies that do?—Joyann Dwire
A: Some newspapers won’t review self-published books simply because they’re concerned about legal issues. Self-published books aren’t subjected to the rigorous editing process employed by publishing companies, particularly the legal and plagiarism issues that most concern newspapers. Publishing companies do all the legwork and guarantee the book is original, fact-checked and libel-free—after all, their reputation is at stake. And while you may have quadruple-checked your facts, newspapers can’t rest their reputation on your shoulders. Of course, there may be some snobbery at play at some publications, as the odds of a newspaper being sued over a libelous book review are slimmer than Paris Hilton. But some newspapers insist it’s a legal issue and, like it or not, they have that right. Not all major papers completely turn their backs on self-published books, though. John Marshall, book critic for The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, says that while his paper is hesitant about it, the editors will review them from time to time. “It’s true that self-published books don’t have the editorial screening that commercial presses have,” he says. “But we’re willing to make exceptions. Often the ones we do mention have either sold well or won awards.” The Cincinnati Enquirer’s book page content editor, Jim Knippenberg, takes a similar view. “We don’t have a blanket policy,” he says. “It’s on a case-by-case basis. If it’s a recognizable name, like a notable local person, we might review them. In that case, often we’ll do a piece focusing more on the author than the book.” Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Marketing | Publishing | Reviews
2/5/2008 2:11:14 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 29, 2008
What's the Average Cost to Have a Lawyer Look Over Your Book Contract?
Q: I'm in the middle of the submission process to agents. Obviously I'm hoping at least one will want to represent me, but I'm also deathly afraid of making the wrong commitment with the wrong agent (in other words, signing a bad contract). Having a lawyer look over a contract is good advice, but I also fear that kind of expense. Do you know what the average cost would be to have a lawyer look over a contract and what kind of lawyer would you go to? —Anonymous A: According to WD's legal expert, Amy Cook, if you do decide to hire a lawyer for an agent or publishing contract, be sure that person has experience with publishing law, or, at the very least, intellectual property law. A lawyer who practices in other fields may offer some basic feedback on your contract, but he won't know the ins and outs and is unlikely to understand details that are important to your financial future. Think of it this way: You wouldn't seek the advice of a poet on how to improve and sell your screenplay, right? "Publishing contracts are very industry specific, so find someone who knows how to properly handle them," Cook says. "You can find a lawyer who fits this bill through your local bar association. Another really great choice for writers are organizations." Several writers' organizations that offer lawyers who specialize in publishing law are Chicago's Lawyers for the Creative Arts ( www.law-arts.org), California Lawyers for the Arts ( www.calawyersforthearts.org) and New York's Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts ( www.vlany.org), among others. Any one of these groups can provide help or, at the very least, act as a starting point for you. As far as costs are concerned, hiring a lawyer to review a contract can be pricey, ranging from $300-1000 depending on the lawyer's hourly rate and the contract's complexity. It can be even pricier if you want them to actually negotiate to contract for you, falling somewhere between $500-3000. But if you contact any of the above organizations you may qualify for reduced cost (or even free) legal help. Ultimately the decision to get a lawyer's advice is up to you. It's always a good idea to have an expert review any binding legal document, but, like all other forms of security, it comes with a price. You just have to decide if it's worth it for your book. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Legal Questions
1/29/2008 3:11:12 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Lay vs. Lie (vs. Laid)
Q: Lay, lie, laid—when do you use each? —Annemarie ValianA: Don’t forget about “lain,” my friend! All these verbs have two things in common: They begin with the letter “L” and confuse the bejeezus out of many people. Let’s give this a shot. Lay and lie are both present-tense verbs, but they don’t mean quite the same thing. Lay means to put or set something down, so if the subject is acting on an object, it’s “lay.” For example, I lay down the book. You, the subject, set down the book, the object. Lie, on the other hand, is defined as, “to be, to stay or to assume rest in a horizontal position,” so the subject is the one doing the lying— I lie down to sleep or When I pick up a copy of my favorite magazine, Writer’s Digest, I lie down to take in all its great information. In both these cases, you, the subject, are setting yourself down. Are you with me so far? In the past tense, “lay” becomes “laid” ( I laid down the law and told her it was inappropriate for her to pick her nose) and “lie” becomes “lay” ( She lay down for a nap that afternoon and picked her nose anyway). Yes, “lay” is also the past tense of “lie.” And the confusion doesn’t end there. To throw you for another loop, “laid” is also the past participle form of “lay.” So, when helping verbs are involved, “lay” becomes “laid” and “lie” becomes “lain.” Grandma had laid the chicken in the oven earlier this morning. The chicken had lain there all day until it was cooked all the way through and ready for us to eat. Remember: Lay and laid both mean to set something down, while lie, lay and lain all mean the subject is setting itself down. And now, I lay this question to rest.
Infinitive Definition Present Past Past Participle Present Participle
to lay to put or place lay(s) laid laid laying something down to lie to rest or recline lie(s) lay lain lying Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine. Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
1/22/2008 11:05:44 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 15, 2008
What is a Blog?
Q: While I've read several sites referred to as "blogs," I'm not really sure what a blog is. What is a blog? —Christopher B.A: From writers at award-winning newspapers, to magazine editors to your neighbor's teenage son, almost everyone seems to have a blog these days. But ask three people what a blog is, and they'll all give a different answer because blogs have taken on many different shapes and sizes. According to MerriamWebster.com, a blog (short for "Web log") is "a website that contains an online personal journal with reflections, comments and often hyperlinks provided by the writer." In other words, blogs are easy-to-update sites where the writer is in complete control and posts all of the content. Blogs are updated frequently, from once a week to several times a day. Entries are typically short (ranging from 50 to 1,000 words) and posted in reverse chronological order. Topics range from politics to sports to dog lovers, but the most successful blogs have very specific, focused niches. For example, Whitney Matheson's Pop Candy blog on the USA Today website focuses on links to pop culture stories she finds on the Web. Cincinnati Enquirer sports reporter John Fay blogs daily on Cincinnati Reds baseball news. And besides this Questions & Quandaries blog, I also have a blog dedicated to the trials and tribulations of being a new father. Blogging is a very cheap and efficient way to offer your writing up to the masses—even if your masses consist solely of your mother, grandmother and your grandmother's bunko friend. As a writer, it's not only a good way to practice your craft but also a way promote yourself and your work without having to know technical code like HTML, JAVA or any other acronym-sounding computer language. (Note: For excellent advice on creating a successful blog, check out Maria Schneider's 20 Tips for Good Blogging.) Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Blogging | Business | Marketing
1/15/2008 3:21:21 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Landing Interviews Before Receiving an Assignment
Q: When I cold-call someone to interview them, I feel like a fraud because I think they must be wondering what my real reason for calling is. I have a suspicion this is clear in my voice. Basically, I just seize up and try to rush them off the phone, which isn't doing my writing any good. How does a writer in this position—not having a clear assignment or impressive credentials—best approach this? —Liz A.A: I've been in the same position several times and have found that cold calling for an interview isn't too different from picking up a stranger at a bar: To find success you must be prepared, open with your best line and hope your voice doesn't crack. Obviously it's much easier to land an interview when you have a contracted article—after all, offering exposure in "XYZ magazine" is a good selling point. But a query letter tenders no guarantee of publication, so you have little leverage. "Because there's no guarantee, definitely keep the conversation short," advises Guide to Literary Agents editor Chuck Sambuchino, who's interviewed hundreds of sources. "Even tell the professional that you want to keep things nice and short to save their time." In order to keep it brief, have your key questions ready to go. Be sure to get the must-haves—full name, official title, etc., and then go for the biggest questions. It's also important to carefully word your questions. With limited time, you don't want to waste any of it on a question that doesn't help your cause. Prepare each question to lead your interviewee toward your desired response. "Guide them into saying what you want them to say by being specific, for example, 'I'm just calling because I want to talk to a professional who can tell me if the infant mortality rate is increasing or decreasing in the country, and point to the reasons why, especially the reasons people may not think about immediately.'" Sambuchino says. "Notice I'm not pushing the source toward a "yes" or "no" answer, but merely showing them how I want the question answered. Ideally, the next 60 seconds of them speaking should be filled with key information and solid quotes." Also, be honest with the potential interviewee. Explain that you're putting together a proposal for "XYZ Magazine" and need to talk to an expert before you submit it. Mention that if you land the assignment, you'd like to call back and have a more in-depth interview. This way they'll give you some time now in the hopes that it helps you get the assignment, which will, in turn, help their chances of getting their name into print. Keep in mind that even if you do everything right, you may still get rejected—and that's OK. Just like with the stranger at the bar, one rejection shouldn't deter you. There's almost always multiple sources for any topic; you just have to find them. If you're prepared and professional, you have the best chance to succeed. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Interviewing
1/8/2008 8:33:45 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 01, 2008
Happy New Year!
I hope everyone one had a happy and safe New Year's Eve. Q&Q returns with a new post next Tuesday, so stay tuned. And thanks for making WD a part of your 2008 story. Brian A. Klems and the WD Staff 
1/1/2008 8:41:40 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Numbering Pages of a Prologue
Q: I’ve written a novel and am now working on the technical aspects. What’s the proper way to number pages of a prologue? If the prologue is five pages long, would that make the first page of Chapter 1 Page 6? —Gretchen CourtrightA: Most front-matter elements, such as a prologue or preface, don’t get numbered as part of the manuscript. They’re best introduced with a slug: a very short description in the upper-left corner to help organize the book. For a prologue, include the name of the section and the name of your book—e.g., Prologue: My Life as a Tango Dancer. Using a specialized slug for these sections erases the need for page numbers, so you can leave the upper-right corner blank. When you hit your first chapter, start numbering with Page 1. If you feel uncomfortable leaving off page numbers in the prologue or you really enjoy toying with Roman numerals, feel free to include all the Is, Vs and Xs you want in your front-matter elements. It’s really your call. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Formatting
12/18/2007 2:29:23 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Should I Get a Lawyer Before Signing with an Agent?
Q: Once an agent wants to take me on as a client and sends me a contract, do I need to have the contract looked at by a contract lawyer before I sign?—Allen Reiling
A: Yes, it would probably be wise to have a lawyer who knows a thing or two about publishing look over the contract. Most contracts vary from agent to agent, and it’s important to know exactly what agreements you make by signing.
If you don’t read the fine print or understand the legal language, months down the road you could find out that you not only gave up the right to profits from international sales but also the naming rights to your firstborn child. Contracts can be tough to follow sometimes, but without an understanding, you could essentially sign away anything.
Another thing you may consider before signing a contract is asking for a reference list of the agent’s other clients. Call and ask the clients about their experiences with the agent. If the agent refuses to give you such names, maybe that’s because he knows his clients will say things like, “He’s a bad manager” or “She mishandled my contract” or “I found him sleeping under his desk during working hours.” And that should be taken into serious consideration. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life.
Business | Legal Questions | Publishing
12/11/2007 1:41:24 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Contest Guidelines and Formatting
Q: When submitting a story via email for a contest, how should it be formatted? Text format? Single or double spaced? You get the idea.— D. HolcombA: Competition submission guidelines—much like all writing guidelines—are determined by whoever is in charge of that particular competition. Because sponsors of the events vary, the submission process and formatting vary as well. It's most important to follow their guidelines. For example, if Contest A asks you to single space, you single space. If Contest B asks you to double space, you double space. If Contest C asks you to quadruple space and add emoticons to the end of every paragraph, you do it. The law of the land is determined by the competition sponsor. It's true that some competitions won't specify all the particulars, and you may be left scratching your head. When in doubt, you can follow these general guides when submitting for writing competitions: • Double space (except for poetry and scriptwriting) • Use a standard font, like Courier, Times New Roman or Arial • Be sure your name and contact info is at the top of the submission • Cut and paste in body of e-mail. (Don't send as an attachment unless specifically requested) • Avoid using smart quotes (the curly quote marks). You can turn off the function in Word. • Keep in mind that bold, italics and other formatting often don't come through when pasted into e-mails, so avoid them if possible. Again, most competitions have their own guidelines and it's key that you follow their requests. But when in doubt, these specs should help answer your basic questions. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Contests | Formatting
12/4/2007 2:34:06 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Staples or Paper Clips?
Q. When I’m submitting a manuscript to a publisher, should I paper clip or staple the pages? Are the rules the same when submitting to a contest?—D. FusonA. In general, publishers want manuscripts paper-clipped, not stapled. It’s more difficult to read through 300 pages harnessed together by staples than it is to take off a paperclip and browse through a manuscript. But be sure to check the publisher’s guidelines, because some may have different preferences. And it’s most important to follow the rules of the potential buyer. If they want it stapled, then staple it. If they want it in a Manila folder with a picture of Zac Efron taped to the front, steal your daughter’s Seventeen magazine and give them what they want. Similarly, different contests have different rules, so consult the contest guidelines before submitting your work. But when in doubt, go with the paper clips. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Business | Contests | Formatting
11/27/2007 10:20:16 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 20, 2007
How Much Can an Editor Edit My Work?
Q: A publication I write for regularly just changed editors. The new editors are just ripping my work apart, even rewriting the leads and some sections, or sending stories back to me asking for rewrites. Is this OK? Are there limits to how much editors can change my work and still call it mine? Do I have any recourse if I hate their changes? —ShannonA: As a writer, I know how difficult it can be to accept major changes to your work. But as an editor, I know the importance of reworking a piece so that it fits the style and tone of the magazine. That’s what editors get paid to do. In working with so many freelancers who have different strengths and writing styles, editors must tighten each piece to fit the overall message of the publication. If your piece doesn’t quite fit, it’s subject to little or massive changes. An editor can edit, rewrite and ask you to rewrite sections—or even the entire piece—if it’s not up to the publication’s editorial standards, or if your work doesn’t meet the requirements set forth in the original assignment. After all the changes are completed, the editor should give you a copy of his edited version, also known as a galley. You should be given the chance to look it over and point out any problems you have with the revisions. Most editors try to work through your requests, but ultimately the editor has the final say as to which version runs in her magazine. If you still feel your article is in shambles and you’re uncomfortable running your byline with it, you do have one option: Politely withdraw it from consideration and return any money the publication paid you for your work. This should be a last-case resort, as pulling a piece last-minute will not only hurt the magazine’s production schedule, but also will burn all bridges with that editor. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Ethics | Publishing
11/20/2007 1:33:06 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007
When Do I Spell Out Numbers?
Q: Sometimes I see numbers spelled out (nine) and at other times I see them in numeric form (9). Which is correct?—Kevin Tracy A: Most writers—including me—took on this artistic profession for three reasons: We’re creative, we love to read and, most important, we want to avoid numbers at all costs. Yet somehow, even in writing, numbers have found a way to sneak back into our lives. There are several rules of thought on how to handle writing numbers, but the most common is pretty simple. Spell out numbers under 10 (zero through nine), and use the numeric symbols for numbers 10 and up. I bought eight candy bars from the vending machine. I average eating 29 candy bars per month. There are some exceptions to the rule. For example, spell out all numbers that begin a sentence. Forty-seven-thousand contestants were turned down for “American Idol.” Eleven were selected. Of course, there’s an exception to the exception: Don’t spell out calendar years, even at the front end of a sentence. 1997 was the year I met my wife. And, if you don’t feel like writing those long, awkward-looking numbers, just recast the sentence. American Idol turned down 47,000 contestants. I met my wife in the magical year of 1997. Also, there are other instances where the under-10/over-10 rule doesn’t apply. Always use figures for ages of people (“He’s 9 years old”), dates (February 14), monetary amounts ($8), percentages (14 percent) and ratios (2-to-1). Again, this is a style issue and other sources may suggest different ways of handling numbers. So please, no hate mail. And let’s agree not to talk about numbers for the rest of the day—they make my head hurt. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Formatting | Grammar
11/13/2007 1:15:30 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 06, 2007
One Space or Two Between Words?
Q: My writing course instructor insists that I should go back through my novel manuscript and use only one space after periods. I was taught that you always type two spaces between sentences. Is she wrong or am I just a dinosaur?—Anonymous A: The two-space rule was instituted during the days of typewriters. Typewriters had only one font, so all the letters were monospaced, or took up the same amount of space. That means that the skinny “l” and wider “w” occupied the same amount of space on paper. To make reading easier, the two-space rule was born to give the eyes a break between sentences. With the dawn of computers, word processing programs not only began offering an absurd number of fonts, but each font was programmed to space characters proportionally (“l” takes up about a third of the space “w” does). In turn, most computer fonts will automatically give you enough room between sentences with one space. So, as a rule of thumb, use just one space when typing up your manuscript on a computer. There are a couple of exceptions—the fonts Courier and Monaco are still monospaced—but it’s better to stick with one space and switch fonts to Times New Roman or Arial rather than use two spaces. Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Formatting
11/6/2007 12:45:17 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Friday, November 02, 2007
An Interview With Novel Journey
Hey Everyone, The good folks at Novel Journey were nice enough to interview me and share it with their readers. If you get a chance, stop on by: http://www.noveljourney.blogspot.comBrian
11/2/2007 12:09:55 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Hone vs. Home
Q: My niece is always misusing the word “hone” when she should be using “home.” I know the difference, but have a tough time explaining it to her. Can you explain this rule for us? —Carol M.A: No problem at all, Carol. This is a mistake people make all the time. Often people misuse the word “hone” by placing it in sentences where it doesn’t belong, but it’s a simple confusion that can be cleared up by understanding its definition. The verb “hone” means “to sharpen or make more acute,” as in honing a talent. Alfred honed his negotiation skills to buy a new car at a very reasonable price. I hone my abs by doing 100 sit-ups a day. Generally, people drop it into sentences where they should use “home.” In verb form, “home” (as in “to home in on”) means “to move or be aimed toward a destination or target with great accuracy.” The leftfielder homed in on the fly ball. “Forget about the abs!” I said as I homed in on a mouth-watering candy bar. As a simple rule of thumb, if you write the sentence and need the phrase “in on” after the verb, it’s most likely “home.” If not, you probably need to use “hone.” Brian A. Klems is the online managing editor of Writer’s Digest magazine.
Have a question for me? Feel free to post it in the comments section below or e-mail me at WritersDig@fwpubs.com with “Q&Q” in the subject line. Come back each Tuesday as I try to give you more insight into the writing life. Grammar
10/30/2007 9:00:25 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|