Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Blogroll




# Sunday, September 27, 2009
Pitch Your TV Idea to Agents, Execs, and Producers... on Oct. 5!
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks—

 

Just wanted to let you know, I’m hosting and moderating Mediabistro’s “Pitch Slam next Monday, October 5… and for anyone working on an idea for the next “Royal Pains,” “30 Rock,” or “Kitchen Nightmares,” this is an incredible opportunity!

 

Here’s how it works: we bring in a panel of TV industry experts… you show up and pitch your idea to the panel… the panel gives you feedback on your pitching technique, your presentation, your idea, etc. 

 

You also get to watch everyone else’s pitch—and they get to watch yours—so it’s a terrific way to learn about pitching, and what people respond to, even when you’re not in the hot seat.

 

It’s been a while since the last “Pitch Slam,” and we’ve got an incredible panel lined up…  Jill Young, a creative executive at The Littlefield Company (former NBC president Warren Littlefield’s production company with ABC Studios); Alan Moore, an alternative/reality TV agent at APA; and BJ Ford, a TV literary manager/producer at Roar Entertainment, one of the hottest new management firms in Hollywood.

 

We’ll be doing pitches for all kind of TV: comedy, drama, reality, and everything in between.  So if you’re interested, here’s the scoop… hope to see you there!

 

 

PERFECTING THE TV PITCH + PITCH SLAM

Pitch Your TV idea to Producers and Agents

 

So you have an idea for the next Mad Men or The Big Bang Theory? Do you want to be the new Larry David or Damon Lindelof? Do you think you're ready to run your own hard-boiled procedural or sexy soap? Well, before you can create the next great TV show, there's something you gotta do first. Pitch it!


In this pitch slam -- limited to 20 attendees -- you'll have the chance to pitch your TV idea to a panel of television's top agents, execs, and producers. Whether you're developing TV's next big comedy, drama, or reality show, this is your opportunity to bounce it off some of Hollywood's smartest, most influential buyers and sellers.


Everyone who signs up will get one chance to pitch their idea to our panel of guests, followed by a round of feedback. While we can't promise you'll sell something, we do promise you'll get top-notch, no-nonsense constructive criticism guaranteed to make your idea -- and your pitching skills -- better, stronger, and more sellable.


Panelists will include:


-- Alan Moore, alternative/reality TV agent, APA


-- Jill Young, creative executive, The Littlefield Company/ABC Studios (Keen Eddie, Love, Inc., Like Family, Do Over)


-- BJ Ford, manager/producer (TV Lit), Roar Entertainment



Click HERE for more information…


WHEN: Monday, October 5, 7-9 pm


WHERE: Los Angeles, CA (details to come upon sign-up)

COST: $65 ($50 for avantguild members)

TO SIGN UP: Call 212-547-7890 or click HERE

 

http://www.mediabistro.com/courses/cache/crs5146.asp


Classes Seminars Workshops | Events Activities and Things To Do | Pitching | Writing TV
Sunday, September 27, 2009 12:07:53 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Wednesday, July 22, 2009
The Wind Up... and the Pitch
Posted by Chad

Hey, TV writers--

If you have an idea for the next Flight of the Conchords, Burn Notice, or Nurse Jackie (which, by the way, I just started watching this week-- really funny!) but aren't sure how to sell it, I'd love to see you next Tuesday, when I'm teaching my pitching seminar for mediabistro here in LA!  It's a great seminar and a fun night... here's the scoop...


THE ART OF THE TV PITCH
How To Sell Your Television Series Idea

You've seen the perfect TV show. It's got great characters, weekly cliffhangers, comedy, drama -- everything you could want in a hit series. There's just one problem: it's still in your head.

This seminar will help take your idea from seed to sale. After all, selling your show isn't merely the first step in bringing your vision to life; it's the most important step. What are networks looking for? How should a pitch be structured? When's the best time to pitch? Do you need a franchise? Does attaching talent help?

We will break pitching into three stages: honing your idea, crafting the pitch itself, and getting your foot in the door with producers and executives. We'll examine different kinds of shows and the necessary elements of each. We'll then discuss how to structure a pitch to make it accessible to producers, writers, and executives. Lastly, we'll explore the business of pitching; not only how to gauge the marketplace to make your idea irresistible, but how to navigate television's labyrinthine network/studio system and what you can expect once you get there.

In this seminar, you will learn:

  • The necessary elements every show -- and every pitch -- must have
  • The difference between different types of shows, and how to pitch them accordingly
  • How to structure a pitch, both verbally and as a written document
  • Who you want to pitch to at networks, studios, and production companies
  • When to attach actors, writers, or directors to your idea, and when not to
  • What to expect when you're in the room, making your pitch, and what happens when you leave

Click here for more information...

WHEN: Tuesday, July 28, 7-10 pm
WHERE:
Beverly Hills Bar Assoc., 300 S. Beverly Dr., 2nd Fl., Beverly Hills, CA 90212
COST: $65 ($50 for avantguild members)
TO SIGN UP
: Call 212-547-7890 or click HERE

Hope you can make it... and to get you in the mood, here's a great pitching sketch from The Whitest Kids You Know.



Classes Seminars Workshops | Events Activities and Things To Do | Pitching
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:55:59 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Friday, May 29, 2009
READER QUESTION: Will There Be A Pitchfest in New York?
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks--

Wanted to respond to Rosetta's Great American Pitchfest question from a couple days ago...

"When will an event like this [or at least similar to it] be available in the New York City region?... I learned about this coming event a little too late to plan to attend and would like to know about such future PitchFests."

Well, Rosetta, I talked to Signe Olynyk, the head of Pitchfest, who says that while they eventually hope to do a NYC Pitchfest, it's not on the radar quite yet.  The event started in Canada, where they did two Pitchfests just before the Banff TV Festival and another in Vancouver, in association with the Film and Television Expo of Western Canada, but these were much smaller than the LA incarnation.  While a New York version would be great, it would likely be much smaller-- both in professionals and attendance-- and they'd probably have to fly in many execs from California.

Having said, that GOOD NEWS!... Here are two well-respected New York events that DO have pitching opportunities, so check 'em out... they may be just what you're looking for!...

The New York Television Festival - September 21-26, 2009

Pitch Your Hit: Women-in-Film's Two-Day Workshop - June 9 & June 15, 2009

Good luck!  And here's last year's pilot winner of the New York TV Festival's People's Choice Award, Teachers...




Classes Seminars Workshops | Conferences and Festivals | Events Activities and Things To Do | Jobs Contests Opportunities | Pitching | Reader Questions
Friday, May 29, 2009 12:29:09 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Wednesday, May 27, 2009
A Quick Post re: Pitchfest
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

I've gotten some emails and questions about Pitchfest, so just wanted to respond real fast...

1)  Rosetta-- I'm not sure if/when Pitchfest itself is coming to New York... lemme sniff around a bit.  I'll also try to round up some info on some other pitch festivals, or similar events, and get it up here.  Bear with me... I'll try to get it up in the next few days.

2)  Just to clarify-- Pitchfest is free... AND costs money.  Basically, the first day of classes and panels is free... but the second day, when you actually get to pitch, costs money... and there are different levels of payment depending on what you want.

Hope that helps, and Rosetta-- I'll try and get your info up here shortly!

Chad


Classes Seminars Workshops | Events Activities and Things To Do | Pitching | Reader Questions
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:36:13 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Monday, May 25, 2009
Sell Your Movie or TV Show... and Say Hello... at Pitchfest!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Just wanted to invite you all to next month's annual Great American PitchFest, where I'll be speaking and doing pitch and project consultations.

For those of you who haven't been to PitchFest, it's a two-day festival where writers, producers, directors, and other filmmakers can take classes, network, and pitch their ideas to actual agents, execs, producers, and representatives from studios, networks, and production companies. 

Previous participants have sold scripts, gotten jobs, and signed with representation... and last year's festival sold out!

Most importantly... I'll be speaking there at 10:30 a.m. on Saturday, June 13... participating on "Making It Reel," a panel of reality producers including Tim Crescenti (I Survived a Japanese Game Show) and Donna Michelle Anderson (Big Brother, Queer Eye for the Straight Girl).

I'll also be doing pitch and project consultations that afternoon, and signing copies of Small Screen, Big Picture at the Writers Store booth.

Anyway, it should be a valuable, productive, and informative weekend, and I'd love to see you all there!

For more information, take a look at the attached schedule and check out the website at www.pitchfest.com, or...

Just fill out the attached sign-up form and send it in to the address or fax number on the sheet!

Here's all the information...

WHAT:   GREAT AMERICAN PITCHFEST

WHEN:   Saturday, June 13th; 9am-6pm (Free Classes Day & Tradeshow)
             Sunday, June 14th; 10am-6pm (PitchFest Day)

WHERE: Burbank Marriott Convention Center
             2500 N. Hollywood Way, Burbank, CA 91505

OTHER SPEAKERS/PANELISTS INCLUDE: great writers like Shane Black (Lethal Weapon), Pete Briggs (Hellboy), Joe Forte (Firewall), Simon Kinberg (Mr. & Mrs. Smith), Michael Hauge, Blake Snyder, and many more!

And you'll also have the opportunity to pitch to execs, agents, and representatives from Dimension Films (Bad Santa, Grindhouse, Soul Men), Disney's Gunn Films (Race to Witch Mountain, Freaky Friday, The Haunted Mansion), Principato Young (Reno 911), BenderSpink (The Ruins, The Ring), Morgan Creek (Young Guns, Major League, Georgia Rule, Ace Ventura) and management companies or agencies like Untitled (Zachary Quinto, Elizabeth Banks) and Abrams Artists.

Here's the sign-up form...

Pitchfest Registration Form (2009).pdf (263.59 KB)

And here's a schedule of the weekend's events...

PitchFestSchedule2009.pdf (57.65 KB)

Hope to see you all there!

Chad

Classes Seminars Workshops | Conferences and Festivals | Events Activities and Things To Do | Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing TV
Monday, May 25, 2009 7:04:46 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Pitch Your Idea to Producers & Agents... Next Tuesday!
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

Huge thanks to everyone who came to last night's pilot-writing seminar at mediabistro... it was a terrific turnout, and I really appreciate everyone coming and being so interested!

For those of you who couldn't make it... or those of you who have actual TV show ideas you'd like to pitch... or those of you who aren't sick of hearing me talk about television... I wanted to let you know about a very cool event coming up next week here in L.A.

As most of you know, my TV book, Small Screen, Big Picture: A Writer's Guide to the TV Business, came out from Random House/Crown a few weeks ago... so Barnes & Noble and I are hosting a pitch workshop and panel next Tuesday, March 31.

It should be a blast... I'm going to do a short (45-50 minutes) seminar about pitching, and then we'll have a panel of guests who will actually TAKE YOUR TV PITCHES, then offer feedback on your idea and pitching style!

And the best part... IT'S COMPLETELY FREE!  (And the first 25 people to buy copies of the book that night will be guaranteed the chance to pitch!)

Our guests will be Lindsay Howard, an outstanding scripted TV lit agent from APA, and producers from Joke Productions (Scream Queens, Beauty & the Geek)... so whether you're interested in writing comedy, drama, reality, or alternative... we've got you covered!

Here's all the info... hope to see you there!

WHEN:  Tuesday, March 31, 7:30 p.m.
WHERE:  Barnes & Noble, The Grove
              189 Grove Drive, Suite K-30
              Los Angeles, CA  90036
              323-525-0270


(On a totally unrelated note, I am writing this while sitting in my backyard, on a beautiful California afternoon, listening to Johnny Cash's "Hurt" cover on repeat... IS THERE ANY SONG MORE POWERFUL THAN THIS???!"  Simply awesome.)

IN RESPONSE TO TYLER'S COMMENT (see below): 
Hey, Tyler-- so glad you can come... and yeah-- I'll totally sign copies that aren't bought there!  As for RSVPing... it's just first-come/first-served.  (And again-- this song is awesome... now listening to the NIN version... but I think Cash's cover is better...)

IN RESPONSE TO JOAN'S COMMENT (see below): 
Joan-- thank you so much for the blurb on the blog... I can't tell you how much I appreciate it-- that's terrific!  And wonderful blog!  Everyone... please check out Joan's blog/website, The Publicity Hound, which offers free tricks and advice for generating publicity.  It's a great resource for writers... especially since we often need to generate our own buzz and heat, but-- frankly-- are rarely that good at doing it.  (I mean, come on-- we're writers... we're designed to sit in a room and talk to ourselves... which is why Joan's website is so handy!)


Classes Seminars Workshops | Events Activities and Things To Do | Fun Stuff | Jobs Contests Opportunities | Pitching | Reality TV | Writing TV
Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:41:51 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Tuesday, January 13, 2009
READER QUESTION: How Much Info About Future Episodes Should I Include with My Spec Pilot?
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Today’s reader question comes from Merik, who writes…

“I have been writing my second feature script and I am half way through. As I got to page 60, I realized that this script would make a great cable (HBO) pilot, and would make a great series. I have read some of your Script Notes, which have clarified that my script does meet the Pilot standard. With that being said, should I complete the first few episodes before giving it to my lawyer to reach out to HBO...?  I know where it would go, but… what is expected of me when trying to sell a pilot script that is complete?  How much do I need to have thought through, and how many episodes should I write before trying to reach out to HBO and sell the series...?”

Well, first of all, Merik—thanks so much for reading Script Notes, and I’m glad you’ve found it helpful!

As for how much of the future series to pitch or write, the general rule is: NOT MUCH... and JUST ENOUGH. 

Allow me to clarify...

Very often, when pitching a TV show, it’s hurtful to the pitch and the project’s sale-ability to have too many of the subsequent episodes set in stone.  Network execs—even at writer-friendly HBO—like to have input into where a series is headed and how it develops.  This isn’t because they’re controlling or myopic, it’s because they hopefully know or have a sense of what works best (and what doesn’t) for their network.

Also, series rarely play out the way you may plan or anticipate.  No matter how brilliant you think your future episodes and stories may be, I can almost guarantee that—when it’s all said and done—they won’t actually happen the way you envision them.  This is because new series are so tender, and there are so many unpredictable variables, that it’s always hard to execute your vision just as you see it.  The first several episodes of any TV series are often experiments, with writers, actors, and directors trying various things to see what works, and series often take on a life of their own.  

I’m not saying this to discourage you from thinking about where your series is headed.  You should ABSOLUTELY think about where your story is headed… because at some point, if the network likes your script, they ARE going to want to talk about where you see it going.  I’m simply saying you want to be strategic in what you present and how you present it, because networks don’t want to think you’re locked into something that may not ultimately come to fruition.  TV shows are fluid and evolving, and networks want (and need) to work with people who can adapt quickly.

So what do you do?...  

Some writers include short paragraphs (maybe five to ten) summarizing “sample” story ideas, the kinds of stories the should could tell.  If you’d like to include with those stories your vision for the future of the series… go for it!

Other writers let the pilot stand on its own and wait for the network to ask for future story ideas later (which, if they like the pilot script, they always do).

Basically, whenever and however you feel it's most appropriate, the idea is to let networks know where the series COULD go... the kinds of stories you see it telling... without saying "this is where my series WILL or MUST go."

So my advice…?

If you’re basically submitting this pilot cold and unsolicited, even through a lawyer, go ahead and include some extra story ideas.  It can’t hurt… and you’re only going to get one shot to impress your readers—so hit them with everything you’ve got.  (But again—keep the stories very short… and only send in a page or two total.)

The one thing I would absolutely NOT do is write extra scripts.  They will NEVER get read.  And—honestly?—they’ll probably make you come across as over-eager and naïve, not knowing how the TV development process works… and that will be a turnoff.  (After all, nothing is more set in stone than an actual script.)

(Also, a hint: many people say—especially with sitcoms or character-driven shows—that the first several episodes are simply the pilot revisited.  This doesn’t mean you should repeat the pilot exactly, it simply means that as the show struggles to get on its feet, you spend the first few episodes re-examining and reinforcing the core cast’s central relationships and conflicts.  This not only helps buttress the show’s main relationships, it helps audiences, producers, writers, and execs understand what kinds of stories this show tells, how it works narratively and tonally.)

Anyway, Merik, I hope this helps… and let me know what happens!

For the rest of you, if you have thoughts, comments, criticisms, or your own questions, please feel free to post them in the comments section below… or email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.


Pitching | Reader Questions | Writing TV
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:59:43 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Thursday, January 08, 2009
PITCH WORKSHOP: Wendy's feedback (Entry #9)
Posted by Chad

I wanted to take today to respond to Wendy’s sitcom idea, "Three-Two-One," which she submitted to the pitch workshop last month.  First of all—Wendy, thanks so much for submitting this!  And another huge thanks to everyone who posted a comment!  

For those of you just coming to the party, here’s Wendy’s synopsis for "Three-Two-One," her half-hour TV comedy

Think Sex in the City meets Weight Watchers; this sitcom cold opens each week with Emma, an extra curvy redhead, Mandy a philosophical dumb blonde, and Gwynne, a semi drag-queen, at a weight loss club; followed by an episode where the snarky humor shows the comedic side of their martini-hampered efforts to lose weight, manage their insecurities, and understand the men in their lives.

WHAT I LIKE ABOUT THIS:
You’re starting off in some deliciously relatable territory; everyone can relate to the struggles of trying to lose weight, so right off the bat you’re playing with story fodder that’s incredibly universal to millions of women (and men!).  And while there’s not much detail, I like that these three friends are leaning on each other in other areas of their life as well… like their romantic failures.  Both relationship insecurities and body image issues are rich places to mine for stories.

WHAT I’D WORK ON:
Well, Wendy, while you’re starting off with some good footholds, I think there are three places you need to focus on strengthening this…

1)  CHARACTERSTanya and Scott have already given some great notes on your pitch, and I totally agree with their thoughts.  Even though you have a short amount of time, you need to introduce us to the hearts and souls of the people in your show—or, as I always like to say, show us “how they see the world.”  Descriptions like “semi drag-queen,” “extra curvy redhead,” and even “philosophical dumb blonde” do little to help us understand who these people are, how they approach life and behave.

Think about people you know—maybe even the people these characters are based on—and how they “see the world,” and you’ll probably the answers you’re looking for.  For instance, do you have a best friend who is terrified of everything and views the world as an obstacle course of dangers?  Maybe your father sees the world as a battleground, where he must decimate every obstacle—including people—in his path.  Perhaps you have a fiance who treats life like a party, constantly looking for the next sensual experience… and the all the time in between is just boredom to be survived as easily as possible.  Do you have a sister who sees life as a mysterious labyrinth, full of weird and enticing tunnels and paths, each of which should be fully explored?

Think how much more your characters will come to life if you describe them this way…

This sitcom cold opens each week with Emma, a gorgeous redhead who attacks every opportunity in life like it’s her last… Mandy a neurotic blonde who views the world as a maze of monsters waiting to devour her… and Gwynne, a drag-queen who lives each day as if it’s a frat party without consequences… at a weight loss club.

I’m not saying those descriptions are right for your story… or even great descriptions in and of themselves… but—at the very least—you start to get a sense of who these people ARE… and how they interact and function as a unit.  Which brings me to point #2…


2)  RELATIONSHIPS.  Just as important as who these people are as individuals is how they related to one another… how they’re defined by their relationships within the group.  Like “Sex and the City,” “Friends,” or even “The Office,” your sitcom is essentially a family comedy… but your family’s not defined by blood.  So approach it that way…  Who’s the mother?  The father?  Is there an impetuous child?  An awkward teenager?  A drunken, wayward uncle?

I’m not suggesting you actually define each person according to a familial role; I’m just suggesting you start looking at your group as just that… a group, with different parts that relate to each other and work together, like a machine.  And if you understand how each character sees the world as an individual, you’ll be able to start seeing how they function as a family.

For instance, think how much easier it is to see your characters as a group if you describe them this way…

This sitcom cold opens each week with Emma, a bombshell who views the world as a fight for survival… and it’s her job to protect those close to her, including her friends; Mandy, a naïve waif who longs to prove herself an adult and claim her independence… from her parents, her fiance, and—most importantly—from her best friend Emma; and Gwynne, an irresponsible drag-queen who believes life is a non-stop party, a quest for hedonistic nirvana… and loves seducing her friends—especially Mandy—into joining her ill-advised adventures.

We start to see a triangle of influence… maybe with young, innocent Mandy at the center, and Emma perched liked an angel on one shoulder and Gwynne on the other.  While we haven’t given details, we can start to understand where conflicts and stories will come from within the group.

Again, I’m not saying this is the story you want to tell, but you start to see how your characters interact, conflict, and affect each other.


3)  HOW DO YOU SEE THE WORLD?  This is a big one, Wendy… maybe the biggest of all.  Not only do you need to know how each of your characters sees the world, but you need to know—and be able to articulate in your pitch—how YOU (or, rather, the storyteller and world of this show) see the world.  Chris Carter sees the world very differently in “The X-Files” than Anthony Zuiker and “CSI.” Bill Cosby and “The Cosby Show” see a different world than Ray Romano in “Everybody Loves Raymond” or Matthew Weiner in “Mad Men.”

And an important thing to note… how these shows and storytellers “see the world” isn’t the same as how you, the audience, perceive the show.  Chris Carter, for example, doesn’t see the world as dark and scary.  Rather, he sees the world as a place where we’re all under the illusion that we have free will, that we’re making choices about what to wear, who to vote for, how to cook dinner.  But the truth is (according to Chris)… NONE of us have free will, because everything we do is being controlled, watched, monitored.  Sometimes we’re being controlled by the government.  But even the government is being controlled… possibly by the aliens.

Likewise, Bill Cosby and Ray Romano see the world very differently… even though, on paper, their shows seem very similar (befuddled dads trying to navigate the worlds of marriage and parenthood).  But the truth is… Bill Cosby views his house as his castle, where he’s willing to give his wife and children long leashes to do as they please, but at the end of the day—what he says goes.  Ray Romano, on the other hand, sees marriage and family as a political minefield, where anyone can ambush, attack, or betray you… and your job is simply to survive with as little conflict as possible.

So the question your facing is: how does WENDY see the world?  Or… how does the storyteller “Three-Two-One” see the world?

To be totally honest, I’m not sure—right now—how your sitcom sees the world any differently than “Sex and the City.”  “Sex and the City” was about four best friends trying to navigate their personal and professional thirties… and in a world where nothing is certain and no one is loyal, the only thing they had to rely on was each other.  

Your show needs to see the world differently.  Does this show see the world as a candy shop, packed with millions of delicious experiences to be tried and savored with your friends?  Is the world a series of disappointments… and the only silver lining is your friends’ smiles?  Is the world a race which you can never win… but your friends keep you from giving up?

Each of these world-views will generate different kinds of stories, characters, and comedies… but it’s ultimately your world-view… and not physical character descriptions or even creative uses of a cold open (or any other device)… that will sell your series.  After all, no one tunes into “Gossip Girl” each week to hear Gossip Girl’s voice over… we tune in to spend time with Blair, Chuck, and Serena… and to spend an hour living in their decadent, soapy, melodramatic world.

Anyway, Wendy—thank you again so much for submitting to the pitch festival!  Keep reading… keep submitting… and I hope this helped!


Pitching | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing TV
Thursday, January 08, 2009 7:36:18 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Sunday, December 28, 2008
Breaking into Television: My Interview with Alex Epstein
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks--

Just wanted to point you to an interview I recently did with Alex Epstein, TV writer and author of Crafty TV Writing: Thinking Inside the Box and Crafty Screenwriting: Writing Movies That Get Made.  Alex writes the "Complications Ensue" blog, which-- if you're not already reading it-- is a terrific blog about TV and film writing.

Anyway, Alex has just posted the first of a four-part interview in which we discuss everything from how to get your scripts into the hands of producers to common mistakes made by aspiring writers to how to pitch reality shows.

Click HERE to check out the interview... and I hope you enjoy!

Chad

UPDATE (12/29/08):  Part Two has now been posted!  Click HERE to take a read!

UPDATE (12/30/08):  Part Three has now been posted!  Click HERE to take a read!

UPDATE (12/31/08):  Part Four has now been posted!  Click HERE to take a read!



Career Advice | Fun Stuff | Pitching | Reality TV | Writing Advice | Writing TV
Sunday, December 28, 2008 9:37:41 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, December 18, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: CC's Feedback (Entry #8)
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks—

I wanted to spend today responding to CC’s Pitch Workshop submission for her one-hour TV dramedy, Sarah Weekly.

First of all—thanks again to CC for submitting to this!  Whether you’re pitching Steven Spielberg, a low-level TV exec, or just looking for critical feedback, it’s never easy putting your ideas out there in the world to be judged, so I applaud you—and everyone else who has participated in the Pitch Workshop—for sticking your neck out.  (The Pitch Workshop is also one of my favorite parts of this blog, so double-thanks to all of you… as well as future submitters!)

Second of all, thanks to everyone who has given CC feedback.  I’m sure she appreciates it, and I love seeing chatter and activity in Script Notes’ comment section.

It looks like you’ve gotten some terrific feedback and lots of positive responses, CC, so I hope it’s been helpful!  

For those of you who haven’t read the original post, here’s CC’s idea…

Logline: "Sarah Weekly" is a light-hearted drama that follows 30-year-old Sarah Neel as she tries to navigate a path to a new life with her weekly horoscope as her guide.
 
Synopsis: The morning of her 30th birthday Sarah Sofia Neel had a nice life: nice boyfriend, nice job, nice apartment. By noon, all that's left is her 30th birthday. When Sarah finds a weekly horoscope that seems to have warned of her life's recent upheaval, she wonders what else her horoscope might be able to reveal. With some weekly insight into what's ahead, Sarah tries to build a new life more fulfilling than the one she had before. Along the way, she learns that life has a reason for everything -- and everyone -- it puts in your path.


So, here are my thoughts and suggestions to add to the pile…

WHAT I LIKE:
As everyone else has pointed out, I think you’re tapping into some really fertile narrative and emotional territory.  Chick-lit TV is incredibly popular right now, from the original godmother of Sex and the City to hit broadcst shows like Samantha WhoGrey’s Anatomy and to failed shows like Cashmere Mafia and Lipstick Jungle… and even Showtime’s Secret Diary of a Call Girl.  And as Matt points out in his comment to your submission, last February ABC Family acquired Sophie, CBC’s show about a young talent agent.  So I think you’re playing in a rich, lucrative sandbox.

You also have a fun hook in Sarah’s weekly horoscopes… they’re kind of your version of Meredith’s thematic voice-over that bookends each episode of Grey’s Anatomy.  So you’re off to a good start!


WHAT I THINK YOU SHOULD WORK ON:
Obviously, CC, as the comments to your submission indicate, people are responding to the “horoscope framework” of your show idea, both the chick-lit territory and the narrative device of the weekly horoscopes.  But to be honest, I think your series, or at least your pitch, is still missing the one thing it really needs to get sold, and that is…

Who the hell is Sarah Sofia Neel?


That’s the one thing producers and executives really want and need to know… and it’s the bedrock of your entire series.  After all, no one is going to tune in to see a weekly horoscope… the horoscopes are merely a device, a gimmick (albeit a good one), to introduce each episode’s theme or story.  People are going to tune in because they relate to, root for, invest in, and—quite literally—fall in love with Sarah Neel.  (…in the same way that no one tunes into Grey’s Anatomy to hear Meredith’s thematic bookends and learn her “lesson of the week”; they tune in because they understand and relate to Meredith Grey.  Her desires, passions, fears and frustrations mirror the emotional experiences of her viewers.  In other words: in Meredith, viewers see some kind of representation of themselves… and if she’s not exactly the same person as all her viewers, she’s someone they hate… or would like to be… or fear becoming.  She is, somehow, an extension of some part of her viewers’ emotional lives.  Thus, you would never pitch Grey’s Anatomy by focusing on her voice-over and the beginning and end of each show; you’d focus on truly bringing to life the character of Meredith Grey.)

So while all the little tidbits of Sarah’s backstory (losing her boyfriend, job, and apartment) are interesting, and they certainly help usher us into Sarah’s story, your most important task in this pitch is to let us get to know Sarah as intimately as possible in the short time you have.

And by “get to know,” I do NOT mean telling us her hometown or her favorite food or the name of her cat or what she has for breakfast on Saturday mornings.  

What I mean is… you need to give your pitch’s audience a crystal-clear sense of how this woman sees the world.  Is Sarah a starry-eyed optimist, who—even when her job, her home, and her boyfriend are ripped away—forges ahead undaunted?  Is she a broody cynic who believes the world is a dark, dangerous place where each day is simply a battle for survival?  Does she view life as a game, a vicious race to some undetermined finish line… and the prize goes only to those who aren’t afraid to do whatever it takes to win?  

Maybe Sarah sees herself as a victim, an unwitting mark in some cruel cosmic joke, and she must learn to grow a spine and take charge of her own destiny.  Or perhaps she views life as a cutthroat war… a war in which she has always been a cunning and ruthless warrior… and the loss of her job/apartment/boyfriend is a wake up call that tells her she needs to find some heart and compassion.  Or she’s always been a devout atheist who believes solely in free will… until—just after she loses all that’s important to her—she stumbles across these uncannily accurate horoscopes… and must suddenly re-evaluate and re-strategize her life.

I’m not saying any of these suggestions is right for you, Sarah, or the show… I’m just saying that whomever this character is, you need to know it and articulate it to us, your audience.  And this isn’t simply a matter of listing adjectives or boiling her down to a few short sentences; it’s a matter of understanding her at the deepest level.

Think of people who are close to you in your life: your parents, your sister, your husband or boyfriend, you best buddy, your college roommate, etc.  If I were to ask you to think of any of them in certain situations, you would probably know IMMEDIATELY how they would behave.  How would your mother act if you asked her to loan you $10,000?  How does your sister behave on a first date?  Who’s the first person your husband/boyfriend would call if you told him you’d cheated on him?  What would your best friend say if she met her favorite rock star?  Where would your roommate go immediately after learning she was failing out of school?

I’m guessing most of these answers were gut reactions—you know these people so well the answers barely need thinking about.  This isn’t because you know all their favorite bands or least favorite movies… it’s because you know how they see the world.  You know that your mom views the world as an obstacle course of deadly dangers… and her job is simply to protect those she loves.  You know that your husband or boyfriend views the world as a constant party… and his job is to never grow up and have as much fun as possible.  You know your best girlfriend views the world as a façade… a gigantic illusion where common people falsely believe they have purpose and free will, when—in reality—we’re all just pawns of the rich and powerful.

TV characters work the same way.  The Office’s Michael Scott views his Dunder Mifflin branch as his family and he’s the father... even though he's totally unaware that he's a manchild who lacks the maturity to actually lead.  Prison Break’s Michael Scofield views the world, or society, as a chessboard on which there are clearly two sides—good and evil—and society’s rules can be twisted, bent, or broken as long as it’s done in the name of good (the lines he’ll never cross, however, are betraying those close to him: Lincoln, Sucre, Sara, etc.).

This is how well you need to know Sarah Neel.  Now, I’m guessing you know some of this—and maybe more than you think—you simply haven’t articulated it in the pitch.  But based on the framework of your series, here are some personal, emotional, and thematic areas I’d explore to help find some insight into who Sarah Neel is…

•  OTHER PEOPLE IN SARAH’S LIFE.  Characters are defined not only by who they are as individuals—by how they, as individuals, see the world—but also by their relationships with other people.  Who are the most important people in Sarah Neel’s life… and how does she relate to them?  Her brother, an arrogant womanizer whom she views as lazy child?  Her mom, a mid-fifties wannabe actress who has always acted more like a girlfriend than a genuine parent?  Her father, a money-grubbing workaholic who views children as annoying (but necessary) appendages?  Her old boss, who sees every employee—female OR male—as a potential sexual conquest?

Think about the other people who populate Sarah Neel’s world.  They’ll not only be essential parts of the series; they’ll be essential parts of the pitch.  Think about how each of them sees the world in their own unique way.  How does Sarah feel about each particular person.  How do their world-views clash?  How does Sarah NEED each of these people… and vice versa?  How is Sarah vulnerable in a unique way around each of these characters?  What would Sarah tell each person that she wouldn’t tell any of the others?

•  THE HOROSCOPES.  While the horoscopes are indeed a strong hook, they also raise certain inescapable questions about how you (the storyteller) and Sarah view life, free will, destiny, etc.  It’s not enough just to say that Sarah gets “weekly insight” from her horoscope.  How does she view these weekly insights… and what does her feeling about the horoscopes say about her larger world-view?  For instance, is Sarah a snarky non-believer in all things metaphysical… until the horoscopes start proving themselves true?  Is she a dogmatic believer who blindly follows each horoscope’s advice… thus constantly finding herself in awkward and hilarious misadventures?  Or is she a pragmatic skeptic who believes the horoscopes aren’t divine advice, but the brainchild of a kindred spirit… and if she can meet the man writing them, she’ll find her soulmate?

Whatever you decide, I think you’ll find that Sarah Neel’s attitude toward the horoscopes—and all the issues surrounding horoscopes: fate, pre-determination, karma, etc.—reveal a lot about who Sarah is and she sees the larger picture of her world.

•  WHERE DO YOU WANT SARAH TO END UP?  What’s her personal/emotional journey?  And while she may not (in fact, almost definitely WILL not, if your show makes it on the air) actually end up where you initially envision her, thinking about where you’d like her to go often helps illuminate the central questions and issues of her life.  For instance, if you know you’d like her to go from homeless, jobless, and partner-less to having her own husband, a sexy husband, and an enormous mansion, you can start to realize the emotional and narrative steps it’ll take to get her there.  But those steps and lessons are different than if you want Sarah to wind up remaining single (but realizing she can survive on her own), struggling in her career (yet enjoying the challenges), and in a tiny one-bedroom house (which she bought with her own meager savings).  And THOSE emotional steps are different than if you want Sarah to start off with a successful career, a knock-out boyfriend, and a killer townhouse… then lose it all and wind up alone, penniless, and sleeping in a gutter.

When you’re actually pitching this to producers or executives, you probably won’t tell them where you think Sarah’s journey (and the series) will end—in fact, having your series pitch that choreographed can hurt your chances of selling it—but it WILL help you zero in on the core pillars of who Sarah is… and, therefore, how she sees the world around her.


Anyway, CC, I hope this is helpful feedback.  As your other readers have clearly pointed out, you are off to a great start… you’ve created a terrific device to get in and out of your stories… you have the seeds of a vibrant character and a wonderful world… and I think you’re well on yor way to fleshing out a terrific hit series!

As for the rest of you (and CC, too)—thanks for all your feedback… and please CLICK HERE and offer some supportive criticism for our latest entry in the Script Notes Pitch Workshop: Wendy’s sitcom pitch for Three-Two-One.

Talk to you all soon!

Chad


Pitching | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing TV
Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:04:31 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Thursday, November 06, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #7 Feedback
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks—

Today’s Pitch Workshop entry comes from Mary S., who sends in a logline for her feature romantic comedy.  Take a look…

First of all—Mary, thank you so much for sending this in!  Secondly, thanks to everyone who has already offered Mary their feedback and criticism… I hope it was helpful, Mary… and feel free to keep it coming!

And now, here’s Mary’s logline

"In the feature length romantic comedy, American Breakfast, a bi-cultural young Latino flees an unjust U.S. sentence and clears away the wreckage of his irresponsible past in a quirky coastal Mexican village where he finds love, acceptance and a new life."

And here are my thoughts…

WHAT I LIKE:

I think you’re starting from a great place, Mary, because your story has a wonderfully strong emotional arc.  Stories about redemption can be incredibly powerful, and American Breakfast is very acutely about redemption.  I think you’ve also done a nice job of setting up two different worlds to reflect your hero’s emotional journey; he travels from an unjust U.S. to an accepting Mexican village… just as he travels from irresponsibility to maturity—so some important touchstones of your story are already in place.

WHAT I’D WORK ON:
You’ve gotten some good feedback from readers so far… I think everyone’s dead-on when they say the logline needs more details.  First of all, what’s the main character’s name?  Giving him a name will help us humanize and relate to him.  But even beyond that—it’d be nice to have some details to help illuminate the interesting parts of the logline.  What was his unjust U.S. sentence (murder, robbery, terrorism, etc.)?  Why was his past irresponsible… did he have a child out of wedlock?  Leave his wife?  Abandon his starving family?  How does he flee the U.S.?  Does he run away and escape?  Does he serve his unjust sentence and bolt?  Some fleshing out of these vague areas will help give the story the specificity it needs to come to life.

Having said that…

For me, there are two looming holes which beg the biggest questions…

HOLE #1:  You say this is a romantic comedy, but—put most simply—WHERE'S THE ROMANCE?!  Romantic comedies are never about just one person, they’re about a relationship… Harold and Maude’s May/December romance (Harold & Maude), Harry and Sally’s friendship (When Harry Met Sally), Ben and Alison’s fears and frustrations facing parenthood (Knocked Up).  You wouldn’t pitch any of those movies by describing just one person… you’d illustrate each of those relationships, bringing it to life so your audience could understand it and—hopefully—see some reflection of their own life in it.  So I’m not even sure it’s POSSIBLE to pitch a romantic comedy where the logline focuses on something other than the dynamic between two characters.  Unfortunately, the American Breakfast logline doesn’t even MENTION another character—so I’m not sure how this is a romantic comedy at all.  (That doesn’t mean it’s NOT a romantic comedy.  Perhaps the logline needs to be revamped to focus on the romantic relationship at the core of the story, or perhaps it’s just mislabeled and it’s not a romantic comedy after all.)

Refocusing the logline on a relationship doesn’t mean you have to ditch the themes of redemption and justice you want to explore… it just means you need to study them through the lens of your story’s particular romance.  Here, for instance, are a couple sample loglines that tell a similar story… but through a more romantic lens:

•  When Mexican-American Carlos is framed for murder in Los Angeles, his only hope of escape is to entrust his life to an impulsive—and gorgeous—female bounty hunter who offers to return him to his Mexican village… as long as he will father her child.

•  When Carlos, a petty pick-pocket, decides to hide out in a Mexican village to escape an unjust robbery sentence, he hopes to live under the radar forever… until Penelope, a headstrong political lobbyist, mistakes him for an old ‘60’s activist and convinces him to join her campaign.


I’m not saying either of those is good—or the story you want to tell—I’m just saying they each focus on a romance… you can see where the comedy will come from… and they don’t completely sacrifice the spirit or themes of the original.

(Having said that, maybe your script ISN’T ultimately meant to be a romantic-comedy—it’s just mislabeled—in which case I’d just remove the label.)


HOLE #2:  I think the other big missing chunk here is… WE NEED TO MORE INFO ABOUT THE VILLAGE HE’S GOING TO.  I know I say this a lot, but all stories—at their core—are about RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS… and if American Breakfast isn’t a traditional romantic comedy about a relationship between two people, it’s CERTAINLY about a relationship between your hero and this village.

For me, there are two ways to go with this, and while neither is better or worse, each path makes it a very different story.  So is this village… A) your hero’s hometown, or is it B) a totally new place?  Here’s the difference…

If the village is your hero’s hometown (like in Beautiful Girls or Ed), he’s returning to a place full of history and “ghosts,” where he already has relationships… and probably damaged relationships he never wanted to return to.  American Breakfast then becomes a redemption story about a guy returning home to repair broken pieces of the life he’d left behind.

But if the village is a totally new place (like in Doc Hollywood, Northern Exposure, or Cars), it becomes a world that opens your hero’s eyes to new people, relationships, and opportunities.  Only in this new land can he shed his “irresponsible” past and become the man he’s always wanted to be.  In this case, American Breakfast becomes a redemption story about an outsider who—thanks to the magic of this special village—washes away the sins of his past to become a whole new person.

Neither of these story-paths is better than the other… but I think choosing one (or another one that I’m not thinking of right now) will help fill out your particular movie and help us understand your main character’s journey.  (I’m also guessing you may know—somewhere in your head—exactly which village it is… it’s just not articulated in the logline.  But if not… think about it; it’s an important question.)

Anyway, Mary—you’re off to a great start, and I hope this feedback is helpful!

Everyone else—if you have a logline or short synopsis you’d like to submit to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to post it in any of the comments sections… or email it to WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.  You can also email me with thoughts, suggestions, or questions about writing, the industry, or anything else!

In the mean time, keep reading… we’ve got some cool stuff coming up: book reviews, movie reviews, reader questions, and more pitch submissions!


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:01:23 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Friday, October 17, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 5
Posted by Chad

Today's submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Matt in Montreal, who is looking for feedback on his synopsis for his feature idea, Downsize This! (although he's not married to the title).  He also says:

"I'm aiming for a Jim Carrey inspired, farout main Protagonist, contrasted with an even wilder love interest, populated with supporting characters with their own selfish designs...

I'm happy with what I have here, but if you could offer me any specific guidance with how to improve the above synopsis, I would greatly appreciate it."


So please... take a look and post your constructive criticism in the comments section below!  Here's Matt's synopsis... and thanks for submitting, Matt!...


Title: Downsize This!
Genre: Romantic Comedy

"Love in the Time of Downsizing"

Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in 6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish - and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.

But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric, alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing; he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence - that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate future within the company.

It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident; a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face during these tough economic times.

Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance prize.

In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Friday, October 17, 2008 10:20:30 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [4]
# Thursday, October 16, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP/READER QUESTION: The Importance of Loglines
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Just wanted to give a quick follow-up to Tuesday’s episode of the Script Notes Pitch Workshop… and an answer to a question asked by Scott, the author of Tuesday’s Pitch Workshop entries.  Scott writes:

“Wow, thank you so much for all your help. You are completely right, I know what the story is about but I have not explained that. I think i just found it so hard to distill my ideas into one or two sentences that I end up just writing generic lines.

Should I expand them a bit beyond two sentences? Or should I focus more on keeping it short but packing more information in? I could write a paragraph which would be a lot simpler and easier to read, but I dont want to write too much.”


Scott… I’m so glad you asked, because I get this question a lot: some version of “I can’t distill my story idea into just one sentence,” or “My story is too complicated to be condensed into a single line.”

It’s a common challenge… every writer goes through it… but here’s my answer… (and I’m gonna sound like an asshole when I say this, so I’m just gonna say it)…

If you can’t distill your story into a single sentence, you don’t yet know what your story IS.

Now, I know what you’re thinking… “Of course, I know what my story is… it’s my story… how would you know if I know it or not?!”  But bare with me…

There’s not a story in the world that can’t be boiled down to one sentence.  The Iliad, Citizen Kane, A Rose For Emily, The Office, Freddy Vs. Jason, Dragnet… every tale in the history of the world can be told in a single line.  Take a look…

•  Kim, a twentysomething recovering drug addict, must confront the ghosts of her family’s past when she returns home from rehab the week of her sister’s wedding.  (Rachel Getting Married)

•  Liz, a thirtysomething TV writer, attempts to maintain her artistic integrity, vision, and sense of self as she produces a sketch show under the aegis of a massive commercial corporation.  (30 Rock)

•  When terrorists kidnap the president and take over the White House, Mitch Rapp—a level-headed, tough-as-nails secret agent—must single-handedly do what the ineffectual U.S. government can not: infiltrate the White House, rescue the president, and defeat the terrorists. (Transfer of Power)

Now, these loglines aren’t necessarily perfect, but I do think they sift out each story’s essence: the story’s main character, what that character wants, obstacles in her path, and a sense of how the story works emotionally.

So being able to write a logline isn’t just developing a sales tool, a succinct blip to quickly communicate your story… it’s an exercise to help YOU understand the basic nut of your story, it’s primary narrative and emotional engine.  

THIS is the most important purpose of the logline… to laser-focus you on the core of your story.  Which is why I say: if you can’t tell your story in a single logline, you don’t yet know what that core is.  

Perhaps you’re trying to tell too many stories at once… perhaps you don’t fully understand your main character… but until you can articulate your story in one tight sentence, you still have some developing and pre-writing to do.

Anyway, Scott… I hope this helps (without sound too asshole-y)… and please keep reading and posting!  Coming up in the next few days, we have more Pitch Workshop entries, new movie reviews, some great new websites, and more!

Chad


Pitching | Reader Questions | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:42:17 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Tuesday, October 14, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 4
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Today’s submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Scott, who submits loglines for two feature ideas.  So before we dive in… Scott—thank you so much for sending these!  The Pitch Workshop is one of my favorite parts of doing this blog, and I always wish people would use it more.  So A) I really appreciate you submitting, and B) I hope this feedback—and the feedback you get from other readers—is helpful as you develop these ideas!

Having said that, let’s get started!  Here are Scott’s loglines…

1) THE SPITCHCOCKS, a feature comedy, is about four friends who form a famous rock band who implode in the most spectacular way. Now they must reunite for the biggest gig of their life.

2) THE DEVIL'S MONEY, a feature crime drama, is about corrupt Mexican police forces who battle during the search for a kidnapped teenager.


Now, normally, I like to look at different ideas separately, but today I want to look at these together, because I think they both have very similar strengths and weaknesses.

STRENGTHS:
One of the best things about both ideas is their strong sense of the “kind of movie” they want to be.  While each is just a logline with few details, I get a definite feel for each film… it’s like I can see snippets of each movie or their trailers… and I also get the sense that Scott, the writer, see much more of the canvas on which these stories are painted.  And that’s a great place for Scott to start from.


WEAKNESSES:
Firstly, Scott-- while both these ideas have great “backdrops,” I’m not sure what the actual STORIES are.  Story comes from a main character (or characters) having an incredibly strong WANT that forces him to take ACTION… and that action places him in conflict with OBSTACLES he must conquer or navigate.  And unfortunately, neither logline details a main character(s), what he/she wants, specific courses of action, or any tangible obstacles the hero might encounter.

Secondly—or maybe hand in hand—the loglines—while good at conveying a “sense of spirit”—are written in such broad generics (“the most spectacular way,” “the biggest gig of their life”) that while I believe YOU have a strong sense of these worlds, it’s tough for me to share in it.  I see MY version of “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life,” but I’m not really sure if my own imagination’s versions are accurate to your vision and story.  And your job, as a writer, is to communicate your own specific vision, not necessarily entice me with what MY vision could be.


So...

SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THESE:

1)  IDENTIFY YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS.  Does The Spitchcocks revolve around Larry, the band’s former lead singer, who wants to help his bandmates heal their animosity so they can reunite for one last enormous gig?  Is it about the drummer, Razor, who wants the band to play a charity concert to raise money for his baby’s life-saving surgery?  Or is it a straight-up ensemble piece… in which you identify the main characters as a unit?  For instance, are they now mid-forties, middle class suburban parents who must suddenly juggle day-jobs and parenting as they attempt to get in shape for a new tour?  Or are they poor late-twenties singles who broke up after a violent falling out?  Are they Midwestern bumpkins who somehow succeeded as a rap band—The Tractor Pulls—in the big city?  Or are they former hair metal rockers now out of place in a hip-hop world?  

Paint a picture of these guys so we can not only see them visually, but we “see” them emotionally and understand how the world looks to them.

The same goes for The Devil’s Money.  Does this story follow one particular cop, like Eric, a righteous cop trying to find a missing child amidst a city run by corruption?  Does it follow Charlie, the kidnapped kid’s father, desperately trying to work with corrupt officials to rescue his son?  Or is it an ensemble piece about District Battalion 89, the most corrupt police force in Mexico City, that must pull together to save this one particular kid?

Whether the story follows one person or a group, giving them a name and a few words of description will help us connect to them.


2)  WHAT DOES THIS MAIN CHARACTER WANT?  I hinted at this above—and specifying his want will also help flesh out your main character—but let us know exactly what your protagonist wants… both “tangibly” and “emotionally.”  Perhaps Norman, your main character in The Spitchcocks, wants to reunite his band so he can win the heart of his true love… a girl who used to be the world’s biggest Spitchcocks fan.  That may not be the story you want to tell, but it DOES give a sense of what Norman wants “tangibly”—A) a girl, and B) to reunite the band—and it lets us know what he wants “emotionally”… true love.  We understand how this onjective will drive Norman to action… and, because it has an emotional engine (we all understand the desire for true love), it allows us to invest emotionally in Norman’s quest.

Similarly, in The Devil’s Money, does your main character simply want to find the missing kid?  Or is your main character Carlos, a police chief who wants to rid his force of corruption… and their newest case—the missing kid—is the one he’s determined to use to rid his force of evil?  Or is your main character Jules, the kid who’s been kidnapped, and he desperately wants to be rescued… but learns the corrupt police force itself is behind his capture?

Whatever you decide for each story, knowing—and articulating—your characters’ wants is the engine that drives the narrative.  Put it up front, big and bold, in both your logline and your actual script.  Without it, the rest of your script is much less effective; but let your audience understand and relate to your hero’s want, and you’ve already taken a huge step toward constructing a successful story.


3)  SPECIFY THE EXACT ACTIONS YOUR MAIN CHARACTER(S) MUST TAKE TO ACCOMPLISH HIS/HER WANT.  The Spitchcocks, for instance, is about a band reuniting… so what tangible actions must be taken for this to succeed?  Do the band members live in different countries, so Hank, the frontman, but physically travel the globe in order to gather them all?  Is the lead singer in jail for pot possession… so your lead character—Toby, the bassist—must break him out and get him to the gig before he’s re-arrested?

In The Devil’s Money, you mention that corrupt cops are searching for a kidnapped kid… and there’s also a war between cops.  While I’m not sure which is your “A-story,” I think this will clear up when you pinpoint your main character’s want.  If the objective is to find the kid, what actions does this entail?  Do they have five internal suspects the main cop, Pepe, must interview, opening a world of corruption and scandal in Pepe’s own department?  Or must Pepe and his partner, Ricky, search for the missing child in Mexico’s dangerous and seedy underworld, which is more (or less) corrupt than the police force itself?


4)  WHAT IS YOUR HERO’S MAIN OBSTACLE?  Like identifying your characters’ wants and actions, we also need to know exactly what is preventing your main character(s) from succeeding.  Why can’t The Spitchcocks simply reunite?  Even if they now live on different continents, why can’t they just hop on a plane and get back together?  What is preventing their actions from accomplishing their goal?  Did the Spitchcocks break up over soapy and unresolved sexual/romantic tensions?  Do they have different artistic visions that constantly cause them to fight?  Does one of them have amnesia that has wiped his memory of all the songs?  

Likewise, how does a battle between corrupt cops interfere with them finding a missing kid?  Are the cops lazy and refuse to work?  Is this the child of an enemy faction’s chief, so the other cops refuse to look for him/her?  Do they not want to find this child because he possesses valuable information that could reveal and punish certain corrupt cops?

Whatever you decide, your obstacle needs to be large and dramatic enough that we immediately understand how it will impede our hero’s journey.  Like your character’s want, the best obstacles aren’t just “tangible” obstacles, they’re also are also “emotional” obstacles, forcing the character to confront something in his/her relationships with other people.  

For example, the reuniting Spitchcocks could be faced with the obstacle that they all live on different continents.  This is, obviously, a huge challenge to their reunion.  But it’s a STRONGER challenge if they live on those different continents because ten years ago, when they were together as a band, the lead singer, Jorge, married the drummer, Carrie, and had an affair with the bassist, Vince.

Lastly, Scott…


5)  AVOID WRITING IN GENERICS LIKE “MOST SPECTACULAR WAY” AND “BIGGEST GIG OF THEIR LIFE.”  Although loglines must use words sparingly, they must also be the right words to communicate your story accurately and with detail.  “Biggest gig of their life” may mean one thing to one reader… and an entirely different thing to another reader.  And what’s most important is that your reader understands what those moments mean to YOU.

Having said that, it doesn’t matter exactly what the Spitchcocks’ “biggest gig” is… or how “spectacularly” the Spitchcocks implode… as long as it’s the biggest “EMOTIONAL” gig of their life and the most “EMOTIONALLY” spectacular implosion they could have.  

For example, you could argue that the “biggest gig of their life” is that they’ve been invited to open for U2 for ONE NIGHT ONLY (the normal opener is out sick), and if it goes well, it could re-launch their career.  This could obviously be “the biggest gig of their life.”  

OR… “the biggest gig of their life” could be this: the lead singer Barry’s daughter is dying, and Barry doesn’t have the money for her surgery… so he reunites the band for a charity concert to raise $500,000 and save his child’s life.  This could also be the “biggest gig of his life.”  And—frankly—it may even be “bigger,” because the stakes are higher.

OR… perhaps The Spitchcocks is a wonky sci-fi comedy, and the band has been kidnapped by an alien race that tells them: “You have 24 hours to put together a concert of entirely new material… or we’ll destroy the planet Earth.”  Silly, I know—but with the right tone it could work… and THAT is certainly the “biggest gig of their life.”

What this basically boils down to, Scott, is your story’s STAKES (what your characters stand to lose if they fail in their quests)… and deciding/understanding what they are.  Once you know that, those are the specifics to plug into the vague holes left by “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life.”


Anyway, Scott, I hope this is helpful!  Feel free to play, shape, mold, rework, tweak, polish… and resubmit.  

In the mean time, if other readers have loglines or summaries for the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to post them here, or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.

In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great posts coming up.  We’ll have more Pitch Workshop submissions… we’ll talk about how to protect your work… we'll help the American Idol writers earn fair pay, residuals, and health benefits… we'll have book reviews… and much, much more!


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:25:56 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Saturday, August 09, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: RESURRECTED... AND ENTRY #3
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

So, it’s been a while since we’ve visited or talked about the SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP, but I don’t want to let it fall through the cracks.  In fact, I’d like to revamp it a bit.  Originally, I’d proposed doing it in two or three-week stages: for a certain time period, readers could submit loglines, then we’d do slightly longer summaries, and—finally—a page-long synopsis.  The idea was that people could get feedback on their ideas not only from me, but from other readers as well.

But only about four people ever submitted ideas, so I’ve been re-thinking the process a bit, and I’d like to give it another try.  Here’s what I’m thinking…

•  Let’s do away with the two/three-week phases and, instead, make it an ongoing cycle.  Whenever you have an idea… email it to me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com, or simply post it as a comment to this post or one of the other workshop submission posts.  I’ll then post it as its own blog post so other readers can find it and give you feedback.

•  Since we’re not submitting in stages, feel free to submit a logline, paragraph or one-page summary.  PLEASE DON’T SUBMIT ANYTHING LONGER THAN ONE DOUBLE-SPACED PAGE!  However, submit whatever you think will garner the most helpful feedback.

•  Also, I’ve added the Pitch Workshop to the list of CATEGORIES on the left side of the screen so it will always be easy to find.  That way, you don’t have to comb through old blog posts to find this post, or other submissions, if you want to submit anything or leave someone feedback.  I’ll make sure all submission, past and present, find their way to the Pitch Workshop category.

•  All the old etiquette rules still apply… the workshop isn’t here so we can bash each other or our ideas… it’s here so we can all get helpful feedback and constructive criticism on our ideas.  So definitely be honest in your feedback, but be polite and respectful!

•  Lastly, if you submit an idea, take a moment to give some quick feedback to other readers who have submitted loglines or summaries.  You can tell them you love it, or tell them what’s “bumping you” and a quick suggestion to tweak it.

Ultimately, I’d love for the Pitch Workshop to be not only a great forum for swapping ideas and creative suggestions, but a forum for dialogue about story, character, etc.  I’ll do my best to respond to as many submissions as possible myself.

So to re-kick start the workshop, I thought I’d take a moment to give some feedback to Tanya, who not only submitted her movie logline last month, she commented on Phillip Sevy and E. Daniel’s submissions as well.  

First of all, Tanya—thanks for offering those guys your feedback… I hope they found it helpful!  Second of all, sorry it’s taken me a while to get your feedback up here, but—at long last—here you go!...

TANYA’S LOGLINE:

BRB TO THE FUTURE, a feature-length comedy, follows 13-year-old cell phone-obsessed Barbara as she travels 500 years into the future, where chat/text message abbreviations are more than just the latest craze – it’s a spoken language used by every nation in the world.

WHAT I LIKE:
There’s clearly a lot of fun to be had with a futuristic world that has become so technologically dependent that our very language has degenerated into a universal mess of abbreviations.  It’s a great way to comment on where we are today and where we’re going.  Having said that…

WHAT I THINK NEEDS WORK:
You’ve given us a fantastic detail about the future world, but I’m not sure of two important things…

A)  What does the rest of the world looks like, and how is it a reflection of our world today?  Your future’s language has clearly changed, in a wonderfully dark and comedic way, but what else has changed in this cautionary tale?  Are people so techno-dependent that they have chips embedded in their heads, allowing them to download movies or talk to friends without the aid of computers/telephones?  Is everyone a cyborg?  Is the planet simply one big sprawling city?  The idea that cell phones and texts have eroded our language skills is great… but how else do you envision computers and technology changing humanity—for better or worse?  This will be the key to selling (both creatively and commercially) your story: creating a world that articulates where you see us headed… and how it’s a comment on today’s society.  (Think about The Matrix, Idiocracy, Clockwork Orange, 1984, etc.  These stories are all set in the future—and in some cases, even play with language in similar ways to your BRB TO THE FUTURE, but they concoct a full-bodied world that holds a mirror up to our own.)

B)  What’s the actual STORY in BRB TO THE FUTURE?  What does Barbara want?  I presume she’s trying to get back to her own time…?  But in that case, how did she get to the future, and—however she traveled—why can’t she just hop back?  (In Back to the Future remember, Marty traveled back in a time traveling car, but the car broke… so he had to fix it before he could return.)  And WHY does Barbara want to return to the past?  From your initial set-up, it seems she has traveled to a future tailor-made for her… so I’m guessing/assuming she begins to learn the downsides of this blind dependence on cell phones/technology.  Perhaps she discovers no one in your techno-dependent future is capable of human connection; babies are made in labs, people live alone in pods, heartfelt discussions are a thing of the past, etc.  But as she learns this, does she use her “stronger” interpersonal skills to try and rule this devolved future?  Does she despise it and try to leave?

To be fair, I think you probably know the answers to many of these questions and see much more of the movie in your head than has been articulated in your logline.  But I would adjust the logline to accommodate more of that vision, rather than just focusing on the one detail of the world’s ravaged language.  For instance, while I don’t want to rewrite your logline for you or push you down a story path you don’t like, notice how these revamped loglines give more of a sense of story… without sacrificing the spirit of the world you’ve created…

BRB TO THE FUTURE, a feature-length comedy, follows Barbara, a computer-obsessed 13-year-old, who falls through her science teacher’s time warp and finds herself stranded 500 years in the future, where technology-dependent humans have lost the ability to relate to—or help each other—in any way.

OR…


BRB TO THE FUTURE, a feature-length comedy, follows Barbara, a computer-obsessed teenager, who invents a time machine that takes her to the future, where people are so dependent on machines they’ve lost the ability to communicate… allowing Barbara to take over the world and become an interplanetary dictator.

Again, I’m not saying either of these ideas is good… or right… or the story you want to tell… but they at least give Barbara an engine and arc to carry her through the incredible world you’ve created.

Anyway, Tanya, I hope this helps.  Thanks so much—for both submitting your own idea and commenting on the others… and keep reading!

As for the rest of you… let the pitch submissions begin!  Just put them in the comments section of this post... or email them to WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.  I hope to hear from you soon!

Have a good weekend…

Chad


Pitching | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
Saturday, August 09, 2008 11:52:18 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Saturday, May 31, 2008
THE SCRIPT NOTES ONLINE PITCH WORKSHOP!
Posted by Chad

Hey, film and TV writers—

I’ve gotten several emails and questions from readers with specific questions about pitching projects they’re working on, asking if there’s some way to use Script Notes to really get down-and-dirty, hands-on advice about shaping their TV and film projects.  After all, whether you’re a newbie just penning your first script or a highly paid veteran working on your next Oscar winner, writing for film and TV (especially TV) is a highly collaborative process, and it often helps to talk about or bounce ideas off test audiences.

So I am pleased to announce the kick-off of…

THE 2008 SCRIPT NOTES ONLINE PITCH WORKSHOP…

The online forum where you can test your TV and film pitches and get honest feedback from both myself… and your fellow Script Notes readers.

(And by the way, I can’t take credit for this idea myself.  A huge note of thanks to and Madeline SmootBuried in the Slushpile, one of the best writers’ sites out there, for giving me the idea… but more on Madeline in a moment…)

Here’s how the workshop works…

You guys, our Script Notes readers, can post your film and TV pitches in the comments section of this blog.  Other readers and I will then comment on and critique them in the comments that follow.  I’ll do my best to get to as many of your pitches as possible, giving some feedback on each one, and hopefully you’ll get feedback from other readers as well.  

(If you have specific questions to which you need answers (such as, “Are the stakes high enough for my main character?” or “Is my main character’s objective compelling enough?” feel free to post those as well.)

Periodically, I’ll then select some of the pitches to discuss in a more specific way in larger posts—what seems to work, what doesn’t work, etc.  As we go, I'll also post some tips or bits of advice on each phase.

We’ll do the workshop in three phases, with each phase lasting about two weeks (depending on how many people post):  LOGLINES, SYNOPSIS/ELEVATOR PITCHES, and SUMMARY.  Here’s how each phase works…

•  A LOGLINE is a one-sentence description of your idea – each of these pitches must be one-sentence long (here's a great discussion of one-sentence pitches on Madeline Smoot's Buried in the Slushpile)

•  A SYNOPSIS, or what Madeline calls an “elevator pitch,” is a one-paragraph description of your idea (here are two great entries from Madeline about "elevator pitching": "Fourth Floor Kitchenware, Loungeware, and Perfect Pitches. Going Up."  And "Elevator Pitches Cont.")

•  A SUMMARY, or slightly longer description, is usually about 3 paragraphs to a page (for this, we'll say 250-400 words)

Every two weeks or so, I’ll open the workshop to the next phase of pitches and ideas.  Then, in a few weeks or months, we can start all over again.

Now—before we begin—three important rules…  

RULE #1:  WHAT KIND OF IDEA ARE YOU PITCHING?  Aside from your actual pitch—whether a logline, synopsis, or summary—please be sure to indicate what kind of project you’re pitching: a movie, TV show, etc.  The more specific you can be, the better: a feature-length romantic comedy (like 27 Dresses, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, etc), a TV sitcom (like Two and a Half Men, Friends, etc.), a one-hour sci-fi series (Battlestar Galactica, Lost, etc.), a half-hour single-camera workplace comedy (The Office, 30 Rock), etc.  The more specific you can be, the better!  And if you’re not sure, that’s okay, too!

RULE #2:  OFFER FEEDBACK, BUT BE NICE.  Obviously, we all want and need critical feedback on our ideas.  However, please be friendly and helpful in your criticism; this isn’t a forum to get mean or disrespectful of people’s ideas.  It’s fine to dislike someone’s idea or their presentation, but tell them that in a way that’s constructive and helpful rather than snarky or destructive.

RULE #3:  IF YOU HAVE CRITICISM, TRY ALSO OFFERING SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS.  This doesn’t just go for the Script Notes workshop, it goes for just about every meeting, pitch, or writers room you’ll ever find yourself in.  And trust me—I’ve learned this (and watched other people learn this) the hard way.  If you’re going to knock or shoot down someone’s idea, don’t just criticize it… suggest a “fix,” or a way to do it better.  This isn’t just being polite, it’s because illustrating another way to do something often helps people realize the idea’s original problem.  If you don’t have the perfect fix, offer a “house number,” or bad version of how to improve it.  (I’ll often say to fellow writers something like, “It feels like the stakes could be higher.  I’m not sure what the exact fix is, but maybe if—and this is NOT the right idea, but just as an example—if there was a ticking clock, like a bomb or a deadline they had to meet, it might heighten the tension and raise the stakes.”)


If you have other questions or thoughts, please feel free to post them below or email me at WDScriptNotes@fwpubs.com.

Otherwise…

LET THE WORKSHOP BEGIN!  Feel free to begin posting your logline (one-sentence) ideas!


(And again… a huge special thanks to Madeline Smoot and Buried in the Slushpile.  I met Madeline Thursday night when I had dinner with Brian Klems and Chuck Sambuchino from Writers Digest.  The annual Book Expo America was here in L.A. last week, and Brian and Chuck hosted Writers Digest’s Books Writers Conference.  I hooked up with them for dinner Thursday night and they brought their friends Miriam Hees, who runs Blooming Tree, a small publishing house in Austin, Texas, and Madeline Smoot, an editor at Blooming Tree who writes Buried in the Slushpile, a terrific blog for book-writers.  (Writers Digest named it one of this year’s 101 Best Sites for Writers.)  I highly recommend checking it out… it’s not geared toward screenwriters, but Madeline gives some terrific advice for all writers in general, and even her book-specific advise applies in many ways to TV and film.  She runs a pitch workshop like this at Buried, and it was such a good idea I decided to borrow it.)


Events Activities and Things To Do | Pitching | Writing Advice | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Saturday, May 31, 2008 11:47:26 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [5]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links