Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Blogroll




# Wednesday, August 05, 2009
SAD NEWS: Blake Snyder Passes On
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

If you haven't heard, I wanted to let you all know some very sad news... one of film's most amazing teachers and writers, Blake Snyder, passed away yesterday.  He died in his home of cardiac arrest.  Blake is best known as the author of the incredible Save the Cat books, which helped thousands upon thousands of screenwriters do their best work.

Here's a link to his website, where fans are posting words of sorrow and condolences...

And another link to Dennis Willis's remembrance in last night's San Francisco Examiner...

Blake will be greatly missed, and the art and craft of screenwriting has lost a true leader, mentor, and champion...


Industry Updates | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 7:10:55 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Tuesday, July 21, 2009
MOVIE TALK: The Ugly Truth
Posted by Chad

The best part of “The Ugly Truth,” which opens this Friday, July 24, is that its title pretty much writes the review for you.

A romantic comedy so bland and paint-by-numbers that it’s astounding it even got made (and more astounding that Katherine Heigl and Gerard Butler chose it), it begins by following Abby, an idealistic, micro-managing TV news producer in Sacramento.  When her news show begins failing, her station manager hires Mike, the obnoxious-yet-charming, chauvinistic-yet-honest host of “The Ugly Truth,” a relationship and dating advice show on the local cable-access channel.

Abby and Mike could not be more diametrically opposed; Abby, a “strong independent woman,” approaches dating by having a literal checklist of things she needs in a man… and if he doesn’t meet all ten, the date’s over.  Mike is hedonistic; he loves chicks in bikinis, jello-wrestling, one night stands, you name it.  Although these two characters despise each other, they’re forced to work together because Abby’s news show needs the higher ratings Mike’s schtick is earning.

But when Abby develops a crush on Colin (Eric Winter), her cute and perfect next-door neighbor, she needs Mike’s blunt and insightful advice to snag him.  Thus, Mike becomes a kind of Cyrano to Abby’s Christian, guiding her through a series of dating set pieces: coaching her on her first date via a hidden ear-bud… helping her through a business dinner when her vibrating panties accidentally begin giving her a series of massive orgasms… etc.

Over the course of helping Abby woo Colin, Mike falls in love with her himself.  I won’t bother telling you the ending, not because there’s anything remotely unpredictable in it, but because you already know where it’s going.

Now, there’s plenty of stuff wrong with “The Ugly Truth,” but to me, there’s one weakness that outshines them all.  One weakness that, I believe, is the key to ANY good romantic comedy.  And if done well, any other flaw in the movie can be forgiven.  And that weakness is…

YOU NEVER LONG FOR THESE TWO PEOPLE TO BE TOGETHER.

And if the audience isn’t DYING for the two main characters of a romantic comedy to be together—think “When Harry Met Sally” or “Annie Hall”—almost nothing else in the story matters.

Having said that, it’d be easy to blame this problem on the actors’ lack of chemistry, but I think the problems start not with the performers, but in the script.

There are 2 reasons why the script itself never makes us want Abby and Mike to get together…

1)    We don’t see how they need each other.  Or, rather, we see how Abby needs Mike—he teaches her how to loosen up, be sexy and flirty, and enjoy life—but we never see why Mike needs Abby.  Sure, Katherine Heigl is pretty… but by the end of the movie, even Mike’s chauvinistic character has learned that love isn’t about looks… yet we don’t see him learn what the hell it IS about!  Abby doesn’t teach him to do anything… she barely improves his show… she does NOTHING for him.

All the great romantic comedy couples work like a yin and yang; they complement each other’s strength’s and weaknesses.  Annie grounds Alvy and helps him grow up; Alvy helps Annie break out of her shell, become more confident and able to live a life.

But that doesn’t happen in “The Ugly Truth.”  It’s a one-sided relationship; and when we can’t see what one of the characters gets from the other, emotionally, it makes it very tough for us to root for them being together.

2)    The story, especially in its supposedly comic set pieces, doesn’t explore the Abby-Mike relationship, so we never feel like their relationship is being progressed.  Or rather, since the main plot points—and main comedy points—aren’t illuminating or exploring Abby and Mike, we never get the fun of seeing them spar, butt heads, reach new levels of understanding and connection, etc.

The first set piece involves Abby on a date with Colin at a baseball game.  Mike, a few rows away, is feeding her lines through a hidden headset in her ear.  Aside from the fact that nothing Mike says is particularly unique or helpful, the whole scene feels overly-familiar, trite, and painfully uninspired.  Like when a girl accidentally spills on Mike’s jeans and Mike says, “What the fuck,” so Abby repeats “What the fuck,” and Colin wonders who she’s talking to.  So Mike says, “I wasn’t talking to you,” and Abby says, “I wasn’t talking to you,” and Colin wonders who she’s talking to.  (I mean, come on, screenwriters Nicole Eastman, Karen McCullah & Kirsten Smith—you guys can do better than this.)

The second set piece involves Abby accidentally wearing a pair of vibrating panties to a business dinner where she’s taken Colin, her date.  And when the panties’ remote control falls out of her purse and is picked up by a curious kid at the next table, orgasms ensue.  Firstly, the whole scenes a poor, sad man’s version of Meg Ryan’s orgasm scene from “When Harry Met Sally,” especially when another female diner watches Abby’s orgasm and says, “What in the ceviche?”  

But more importantly—the scene does NOTHING to further the Abby-Mike relationship.  The scene worked in “When Harry Met Sally” because the two of them were alone at a table, discussing women’s ability to fool men… and Sally’s performance not only proved her point, but it put Harry on the spot.  So it illuminated their different belief systems—AND showed how far Sally would go simply to prove Harry wrong.

Yet the similar scene in “The Ugly Truth” lacks all the subtle character/relationship understanding of “Harry & Sally” and is nothing more than a soulless scene about a women having an orgasm in public.


So the lessons to take away from this, romantic comedy screenwriters:

1)    Make sure your romantic comedy characters each need—and receive—something from each other.  Actors’ chemistry is not enough; each character must, on the page—and this is gonna be a poor choice of words, but I’m gonna use it anyway—fill very specific holes in the other.  (EMOTIONAL HOLES!  Get your head out of the gutter.)

2)    Make sure your major scenes and set pieces are somehow exploring and deepening the relationship between your two leads.  This doesn’t mean they have to be visibly and obviously falling in love or showing affection—they can certainly be conflicting… and fall in love later—but it does mean we should be seeing new aspects of their relationship.

In fact, “The Ugly Truth” ends with an exchange of dialogue that beautifully illustrates all it’s greatest weaknesses…

ABBY:  You’re in love with me?  Why?
MIKE:  Beats the hell out of me.

Exactly.


The Ugly Truth trailer




Movie Talk | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:58:09 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Tuesday, July 14, 2009
BOOK REVIEW: Bankroll
Posted by Chad

I’ve never worked in independent film.  I like independent film. I have friends who work in independent film.  I’ve written screenplays that could be independent films.  But me, personally—I don’t think I could do it.  For one main reason…

One of the main duties of an independent filmmaker is to round up money, the financing, and the thought of doing that—quite honestly—terrifies me.  Not only because I’m terrible with math and numbers, but the idea of asking someone for money seems horribly awkward, confrontational, desperate, uncomfortable.  Who do you ask?  How do you ask them?  What if they say no? If they say no, does it mean your idea sucks?  What if they say yes?  What if they say no and never talk to you again?  What if they say yes and never get a return?  What if they laugh at you?

These questions are so daunting to me I’ve never been able to fathom actually doing it… and I have near-total awe and respect for those that do.

But now comes a new book—Bankroll: A New Approach to Financing Feature Films, by Tom Malloy—that explains how to gather financing for your independent film from the perspective of a guy who’s done it.  And most importantly, a guy who is—and I mean this in the BEST way possible—a COMPLETE NOBODY.

Bankroll walks newbies through the process of raising money for indie films with budgets of $300,000 - $8 million.  Malloy talks about where to find HNI’s (High Net-Worth Individuals)... how to put together a business plan… and how to approach and pitch them.  He also spends a lot of time coloring the lessons with stories and experiences from his own career.  Normally, I’m not a big fan of books that claim to teach you the ropes and instead just spout their own stories, but Malloy strikes a nice balance; he tells a lot of stories, but he then uses each story to illustrate a lesson.  And perhaps most importantly…

YOU’VE PROBABLY NEVER HEARD OF TOM MALLOY OR ANY OF HIS MOVIES.  (Anyone seen—or heard of—The Attic?  Gravesend?  The Alphabet Killer?)

This, to me, is the book’s biggest selling point.  We’ve all read books or articles about how Slumdog Millionaire got made, or Reservoir Dogs, or other “indie classics.”  And while we’d all like to write the next Terminator or sex, lies, and videotape, the truth is… most of us won't.  Most indie films come from small, but still talented, filmmakers just trying to raise enough money to make their movies and get them into contests, festivals, etc.  If the movie goes on to become Star Wars or The Usual Suspects, great—but it’s nearly impossible to control or predict this.  So while learning how George Lucas or Robert Rodriguez or Quentin Tarantino worked their magic is indeed inspirational, I usually find it unhelpful.  Those men are anomalies, and it’s tough to learn to be an anomaly; this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t aim as high as possible, it just means it’s much easier to start learning at the ground floor.

(And just to be clear—I’m not saying you shouldn’t shoot to be the best you can be.  I’m just saying that it’s tough to say, “I want to be the biggest, most legendary film producer of all time.”  It’s much easier, and more realistic, to say, “I want to spend my life and career making good movies I love and care about.”  If they go on to become the next The Matrix, great—but you can’t really engineer that to happen.)

This, to me, is Bankroll’s biggest selling point.  When Malloy is telling stories about raising money for one of his films… or walking you through his sample business plan (which is great, by the way—like having a step-by-step template right in front of you)… or even just talking about how he psychs himself up for a pitch or investor meeting… you’re aware that the info is coming from a guy who, very recently, was in YOUR EXACT SHOES.  Unlike George Lucas, who is light years ahead of the rest of us, career and money-wise, Tom Malloy is only one, two or three steps ahead of the rest of us… and he’s giving us the path to get where he is.

So if you’re struggling to figure out how raise money for your latest script… or you’re thinking of dabbling in the low-budget indie film world… take a look—it’s a great primer.  And while I don’t think I’m quite ready to dive into the indie film world myself, I’m definitely a lot less scared.



Books Tools Resources | Career Advice | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:49:16 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Friday, June 12, 2009
35 Tips on Indie Filmmaking... According to Nikki Finke & Friends
Posted by Chad

At last weekend's Producers Guild/Produced By conference, a Deadline Hollywood Daily stringer compiled a list of 35 tips on producing indie films, from the mouths of folks like RJ Cutler, Roger Corman, Lawrence Bender, and a host of great execs, producers, and agents.

Click HERE to check it out!


Books Tools Resources | Career Advice | Conferences and Festivals | Production | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Friday, June 12, 2009 3:48:10 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Tuesday, June 09, 2009
Hung Up on the Hangover!
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

Thanks to Brian, who pointed out this great article on Nikki Finke's Deadline Hollywood Daily about how The Hangover came to be written... it's a pretty fun story-- check it out!


Fun Stuff | Industry Updates | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:04:50 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Saturday, May 30, 2009
A Letter from WGA President Patric Verone...
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks--

Hot off the press, here's a letter from WGA president Patric Verone... thought you might find it interesting...


May 29, 2009             

To My Fellow Members,

It’s been a while since I’ve reported to you about the progress of Writers Guild organizing efforts and the many successes we’ve had in the past two years.  Organizing writers who work without a WGA contract is one of the key ways we strengthen the Guild and protect the standards we have all struggled so long and hard to achieve.
 
Our first priority in organizing is always to defend our core jurisdiction: network and cable dramas, sitcoms (including network primetime animated sitcoms), longform television, talk shows, variety shows, game shows, and live-action features.  Beginning with our current contract, our jurisdiction now also includes original and derivative content in New Media.  Our second priority is the expansion of our jurisdiction to areas where we currently lack coverage or where non-signatory companies have been operating, including reality television, non-primetime and feature animation, and non-fiction.
 
With those priorities in mind, here is a recap of our recent efforts:
 
CABLE TELEVISION
 
In cable we have focused on Comedy Central because it employs a large number of writers. Working closely with writers on Comedy Central’s main shows, we undertook a strategy of escalating actions, culminating in a short work stoppage. One show at a time, we organized WGA coverage for:
 
The Sarah Silverman Program
Mind of Mencia
The Showbiz Show with David Spade
American Body Shop
Root of All Evil
Chocolate News
Reno 911!
Michael & Michael Have Issues
Secret Girlfriends
The Comedy Central Roast of Larry the Cable Guy
The Comedy Central Roast of Bob Saget
The Untitled Jeff Dunham Project
Tosh.0
Eddie Portnoy, Boy Producer
Ghosts/Aliens

 
We continue to build on a positive relationship with the network and recently signed an overall deal covering all future Comedy Central roasts.  We hope to achieve a more comprehensive overall deal and are currently engaged in efforts to cover all dramatic and comedy-variety shows produced by Comedy Central.

Elsewhere in cable we have organized and made deals for dramatic programs, quiz and audience participation shows, non-dramatic, and documentary shows.  In all these cases, the role of the writers in providing information and assistance, and their willingness to refuse work if necessary were keys to success.  Thanks to their efforts we now cover:
 
Tyler Perry’s House of Payne for TBS
Tyler Perry’s Meet the Browns for TBS
The Cheech and Chong Roast for TBS
Match Game for TBS
The Singing Bee for CMT
Secrets of the Founding Fathers for the History Channel
Spontaneous Human Combustion for the Discovery Channel
The Tunguska Event for the Discovery Channel
Animal Armageddon for Animal Planet

NETWORK TELEVISION

 
Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader?
 
Last year we signed a WGA deal for this primetime hit game show.  Recently we also negotiated a deal to cover the syndicated version of the show.
 
Sit Down, Shut Up
 
We assisted the writers of this Sony primetime animated series in a work stoppage aimed at getting WGA coverage.  To resolve the dispute, the company offered each of the writers six-figure “blind pilot” deals covered by the WGA and standard WGA terms for their work on the series, although the series (now canceled) nominally remained under an IATSE contract.
 
The Osbournes: Loud and Dangerous

 
Despite overwhelming coverage of the network primetime writing work force, writers have still had to struggle for WGA contracts on occasion.  One of the essential ways members can protect Guild benefits is by refusing to work for non-signatory companies. Working Rule 8 states: “No member shall accept employment with, nor option or sell literary material to, any person, firm or corporation who is not signatory to the applicable MBAs.” This rule is designed to ensure that the only way entertainment companies can have access to Guild talent is through a Guild deal.
 
We invoked Working Rule 8 on the Osbournes program after the production company, FremantleMedia, refused to negotiate a fair deal.  Guild members heeded the call and refused to write for this non-guild show, which would have been the first non-WGA comedy-variety show in primetime broadcast TV.  To date, only one episode has aired, to extremely poor reviews and bad ratings.  The remaining episodes may well never be aired.  We believe that the failure of this show is a direct result of the company not being able to use Guild writers
 
NEW MEDIA
 
The Guild organized and made deals with 26 companies that have become signatory to the WGA MBA for the express purpose of producing New Media content.  Web programming produced by these companies includes:
 
Seth MacFarlane’s Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy
Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog
Woke Up Dead
In the Motherhood
1,000 Days
Wainy Days
Back on Topps
Web Therapy

 
We have also signed contracts for Internet content from New Media production companies Machinima.com and Science + Fiction.
 
VIDEOGAMES
 
We have signed 44 interactive agreements to provide WGA members with pension and health benefits for their work on videogames. Our most recent deals are for Battle CMT and Project 9.
 
FEATURE FILMS

 
In the past 18 months we made deals to cover several high-profile feature films, including Into the Wild and Frozen River.  Since the beginning of last year, we have made deals to cover 15 low-budget films:
 
Assisting Venus
The Blue Tooth Virgin
Bob’s New Suit
Children of Invention
Exporting Raymond
Father vs. Son
Herpes Boy
The Red Queen
The Scenesters
Strictly Sexual
The Two Bobs
The Undying
Women in Trouble


FOREIGN PRODUCED PROJECTS
 
In the area of foreign-produced projects employing WGA members, we have secured WGA deals for Noah’s Ark (an animated feature), The 99 and Bommi & Friends (animated TV series), and Poirot (a live-action series).
 
REALITY TELEVISION

 
In reality television, we have pressured the networks and production companies through strikes at America’s Next Top Model and the FremantleMedia game show Temptation.  In both cases writers walked off their jobs to protest the companies’ refusal to negotiate WGA coverage.
 
We pressured the entire reality industry through public exposure of the serious labor law violations by reality television production companies.  We conducted a focused exposure of the most important production company, FremantleMedia, the producers of American Idol, with the “American Idol Truth Tour.
 
As awareness of the abuses against workers in reality TV grows so does the number of workers willing to take action.  Last month a group of FremantleMedia workers independently filed a multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuit against the company for its violations of California’s wage and hour laws. Two lawsuits brought by writers against Next Entertainment and Rocket Science Entertainment are in the process of settling for $4.5 million dollars.
 
ORGANIZING THE FUTURE

 
Defending and expanding our jurisdiction do not take place in a vacuum. The gains won as a result of our 100-day strike have helped change the environment in which we undertake our organizing efforts, and as this report reflects, we are making steady progress getting companies to agree to WGA coverage of their projects.
 
The Organizing and Jurisdiction Department has primary staff responsibility for external organizing, but every department of the Guild has participated in and deserves credit for our organizing successes. None of it, however, would have been possible without the support and sacrifices of you, our members.  I would like to personally thank all the brave, committed, and hard working writers who helped with these efforts. Because of you we are all stronger and better off.
 
The organizing struggle is far from over and there is much important work left to be done.  I know the Guild can count on your support and assistance in this crucial effort.
 
Best,
 
Patric M. Verrone
President, WGAW


Industry Updates | Reality TV | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:01:50 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Monday, May 25, 2009
Sell Your Movie or TV Show... and Say Hello... at Pitchfest!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Just wanted to invite you all to next month's annual Great American PitchFest, where I'll be speaking and doing pitch and project consultations.

For those of you who haven't been to PitchFest, it's a two-day festival where writers, producers, directors, and other filmmakers can take classes, network, and pitch their ideas to actual agents, execs, producers, and representatives from studios, networks, and production companies. 

Previous participants have sold scripts, gotten jobs, and signed with representation... and last year's festival sold out!

Most importantly... I'll be speaking there at 10:30 a.m. on Saturday, June 13... participating on "Making It Reel," a panel of reality producers including Tim Crescenti (I Survived a Japanese Game Show) and Donna Michelle Anderson (Big Brother, Queer Eye for the Straight Girl).

I'll also be doing pitch and project consultations that afternoon, and signing copies of Small Screen, Big Picture at the Writers Store booth.

Anyway, it should be a valuable, productive, and informative weekend, and I'd love to see you all there!

For more information, take a look at the attached schedule and check out the website at www.pitchfest.com, or...

Just fill out the attached sign-up form and send it in to the address or fax number on the sheet!

Here's all the information...

WHAT:   GREAT AMERICAN PITCHFEST

WHEN:   Saturday, June 13th; 9am-6pm (Free Classes Day & Tradeshow)
             Sunday, June 14th; 10am-6pm (PitchFest Day)

WHERE: Burbank Marriott Convention Center
             2500 N. Hollywood Way, Burbank, CA 91505

OTHER SPEAKERS/PANELISTS INCLUDE: great writers like Shane Black (Lethal Weapon), Pete Briggs (Hellboy), Joe Forte (Firewall), Simon Kinberg (Mr. & Mrs. Smith), Michael Hauge, Blake Snyder, and many more!

And you'll also have the opportunity to pitch to execs, agents, and representatives from Dimension Films (Bad Santa, Grindhouse, Soul Men), Disney's Gunn Films (Race to Witch Mountain, Freaky Friday, The Haunted Mansion), Principato Young (Reno 911), BenderSpink (The Ruins, The Ring), Morgan Creek (Young Guns, Major League, Georgia Rule, Ace Ventura) and management companies or agencies like Untitled (Zachary Quinto, Elizabeth Banks) and Abrams Artists.

Here's the sign-up form...

Pitchfest Registration Form (2009).pdf (263.59 KB)

And here's a schedule of the weekend's events...

PitchFestSchedule2009.pdf (57.65 KB)

Hope to see you all there!

Chad

Classes Seminars Workshops | Conferences and Festivals | Events Activities and Things To Do | Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Monday, May 25, 2009 7:04:46 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Tuesday, April 28, 2009
GINA'S QUESTION: Why don't playwrights and novelists get rewritten?
Posted by Chad

Today's reader question comes from Gina, who writes:

"I noticed that screenplays are always rewritten by many different writers but that would never happen to a playwright or novelist.  Why the double standard?  But, then again, that is how screenwriter's will make their money on rewriting someone else's screenplay."
 
Well, Gina, screenplays often get rewritten by other people because-- unlike in the world of theater or publication-- when a screenwriter sells a script to a studio, he no longer retains ownership of it; the studio does.

In other words, if you sell a novel to Random House tomorrow, you're really selling them just the publication rights (and probably only for a limited time).  But you still own your novel, its characters, the movie rights, the merchandising rights, etc. (probably).

Same thing if you get a play produced at a regional theater, or even on Broadway.  The play still belongs to you... so you could go sell the film rights or publication rights elsewhere... the producer is simply entitled to the stage rights.

Not so with movies or television.

In movies or television, the studio actually OWNS the script and almost everything that comes with it: merchandising rights, stage rights, etc.  This also means they can change it, re-title it, throw out half the characters, completely change the subplots, whatever.  They can also then hire ANYONE they want to come in and rewrite it... including you.  Which means if you sell your screenplay to Warner Brothers today, you are now-- even though you're the original author-- just a "work for hire," like every other scrambling screenwriter out there.  (However, the Writers Guild DOES mandate that when you sell a screenplay, you-- the original screenwriter-- must get first crack at the rewrite.  But after that first rewrite, the movie studio can fire you, team you with someone else, keep you aboard... whatever they want.  It's their script.)

Now, just to complicate things, writers DO sometimes negotiate something called "separated rights," which means they occasionally get to hold on to things like stage rights, publication rights, etc.  But how many separated rights you get depends on the stature and clout of you, the writer, as well as the quality of the agent or manager doing your deal.

Separated rights can get complicated, but here are links to a couple pages with good explanations...

•  The Artful Writer (a terrific screenwriting blog written by screenwriters Craig Mazin and Ted Elliot, whose combined credits include Shrek, Scary Movie, and Pirates of the Caribbean) - these guys do a good job of explaining separated rights simply and succinctly

•  The Writers Guild of America - Also good, but a much more in-depth, technical explanation

And for LOTS more information, check out The Writer Got Screwed (but didn't have to), by lawyer Brooke A. Wharton.  The book is about 12 years old, but it still offers tons of great information on the legalities of screenwriting and Hollywood contracts.

I hope that helps, Gina!  Thank you so much for the question, and please keep reading!  We've got some great stuff coming up... many more reader questions, contests, book reviews, you name it!

Talk to you soon...

Chad


Reader Questions | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 3:45:19 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Thursday, April 23, 2009
Older Writers - Part II
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks--

Sorry I've been awol for a few days... I was actually out of town with very little Internet access, and I just got back late last night-- so I haven't been able to post for a while!

Second of all, thanks for the posts and emails re: last week's ageism question from Jon in Iowa

First-- kudos to Lisa, who is moving to L.A. to be a TV writer after discovering "that the main thing holding me back is me and not my age."  Congratulations, Lisa-- I'm so excited for you, and please keep in touch and let me know how it goes!  I'll probably need you to hire me someday!

And then Jon wrote in with a follow-up question...

"Do you think your comments apply equally to feature film screenwriting, as
opposed to TV writing? As you pointed out, a TV writer will be looked at with the thought, 'Can this writer function on our writing staff on a day to day, season to season basis?', versus a one time feature film writer, where the script should speak for itself, it's either good or it isn't, whether written by a 24 or 64 year old. There is no continuing relationship with the film writer, like there would be in TV. Do older writers face slightly fewer obstacles writing a feature film as opposed to trying to write for TV?"


Well, Jon-- I think it often can be "easier" for a first-timer to sell a project in film than it is in TV (and "easier" does not mean "easy") because of exactly what you say: selling a project in film doesn't require a long-lasting relationship with the writer.

Having said that, 2 (and a half) things:

1)  There are many "older" screenwriters working in Hollywood today.  Playwright David Hare, who wrote "The Reader," is about to turn 62.  Thomas McCarthy, who wrote the Oscar-nominated "The Visitor," is 43.  Susannah Grant ("The Soloist") is 46.  (Although for the record, I don't think 40's is that old in Hollywood anymore.)

1.5)  A caveat just to torpedo my own thesis: last summer, ICM settled a lawsuit from a bunch of over-40 writers who sued ICM for age discrimination.  Click HERE to read.

2)  It's still incredibly hard for a first-timer to sell something, and I think the obstacles that face older newcomers are the same obstacles facing younger newcomers.  Namely: it still takes an infinite number of man-hours to write a sellable script... and it still takes contacts and relationships.

A little over a year ago, Hollywood was abuzz with the story of Michael Martin, a 27-year-old toll-booth-worker who wrote a spec feature called "Brooklyn's Finest"... and sold it.  People loved-- and were shocked and amazed-- by this underdog story... which I think is relevant here because MICHAEL WAS ONLY 27.  In other words-- it's shocking to Hollywood when ANY "noboby" sells something... even if he's only 27, which is certainly not old by Hollywood screenwriting standards.

Now, a couple other interesting (and often overlooked) things about the Michael Martin story...

A)  Michael wasn't exactly a first-time screenwriter.  He'd studied film in college, so he had some knowledge, and maybe even some contacts.

B)  Michael submitted "Brooklyn's Finest" to a contest... and contests are open to anyone, regardless of age.  He didn't win... and contests don't always (even rarely) result in scripts making their way to producers, but his managed to get to someone.  If the script is as good as "Brooklyn's Finest," the same thing could happen to anyone, anywhere, of any age.

C)  "Brooklyn's Finest" didn't sell immediately.  It actually landed Michael a job... writing "New Jack City 2."  I think this is important, because many screenwriters NEVER sell anything-- but make a very nice living getting hired onto projects and doing rewrites.  But in order to do that... you must LIVE IN LOS ANGELES (or maybe New York, like Michael) and have the time and flexibility to take meetings, meet the appropriate contacts, nurture the appropriate relationships, etc.  And like we discussed before, "older" people often don't have that flexibility... not because they're "older," but because they often have lives and lifestyles-- full-time jobs, families, obligations-- that don't allow them to commit to the 24/7 lifestyle of being a budding screenwriter.  (Of course, Michael Martin blows that whole theory to hell, but Hollywood is an industry of exceptions... and he is CERTAINLY an exception.  So the next Michael Martin we read about could be a 59-year-old plumber in Dallas!)

So what's all this mean?  Selling ANYTHING in Hollywood, especially for a newbie, is hard... near impossible... whether you're a 27-year-old in NY or a 64-year-old in IA.  Is it harder for someone older?  Yeah, probably.  Does that mean there's ageism?  Not necessarily.

But as writers, I think the question we should be asking ourselves-- no matter how old we are-- is NOT "Why can't I sell something?"  It's "How can my work be better?"  And once it's better: "How can it be even BETTER?"  And once it's even BETTER: "My work's not good enough... how can I make it still BETTER?!"

The truth is: THOSE are the questions that will make your script good enough to sell... no matter your birth date.

Also, for a great article on ageism, check out "How Old is Too Old To Be a Screenwriter?" by D.B. Gilles, author of "The Screenwriter Within: How to Turn the Movie in Your Head into a Salable Screenplay" and "The Portable Film School."


Career Advice | Interesting Talking Points | Reader Questions | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:27:54 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [5]
# Friday, March 27, 2009
Wanna Write a Comic Book Movie?
Posted by Chad

Huge thanks to Brenda for pointing out this piece from today's Variety, which reports that Marvel-- the comic book/production company behind Spiderman, Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, etc.-- is putting together a group of writers, a la the Disney Fellowship Program, dedicated solely to adapting Marvel comic books into movies!

Very cool!

Click HERE to check out the Variety article...

And here are a couple other interesting links:

Nikki Finke
MTV


Industry Updates | Jobs Contests Opportunities | Screenwriting (Film)
Bookmark and Share
Friday, March 27, 2009 4:21:27 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, November 06, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #7 Feedback
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks—

Today’s Pitch Workshop entry comes from Mary S., who sends in a logline for her feature romantic comedy.  Take a look…

First of all—Mary, thank you so much for sending this in!  Secondly, thanks to everyone who has already offered Mary their feedback and criticism… I hope it was helpful, Mary… and feel free to keep it coming!

And now, here’s Mary’s logline

"In the feature length romantic comedy, American Breakfast, a bi-cultural young Latino flees an unjust U.S. sentence and clears away the wreckage of his irresponsible past in a quirky coastal Mexican village where he finds love, acceptance and a new life."

And here are my thoughts…

WHAT I LIKE:

I think you’re starting from a great place, Mary, because your story has a wonderfully strong emotional arc.  Stories about redemption can be incredibly powerful, and American Breakfast is very acutely about redemption.  I think you’ve also done a nice job of setting up two different worlds to reflect your hero’s emotional journey; he travels from an unjust U.S. to an accepting Mexican village… just as he travels from irresponsibility to maturity—so some important touchstones of your story are already in place.

WHAT I’D WORK ON:
You’ve gotten some good feedback from readers so far… I think everyone’s dead-on when they say the logline needs more details.  First of all, what’s the main character’s name?  Giving him a name will help us humanize and relate to him.  But even beyond that—it’d be nice to have some details to help illuminate the interesting parts of the logline.  What was his unjust U.S. sentence (murder, robbery, terrorism, etc.)?  Why was his past irresponsible… did he have a child out of wedlock?  Leave his wife?  Abandon his starving family?  How does he flee the U.S.?  Does he run away and escape?  Does he serve his unjust sentence and bolt?  Some fleshing out of these vague areas will help give the story the specificity it needs to come to life.

Having said that…

For me, there are two looming holes which beg the biggest questions…

HOLE #1:  You say this is a romantic comedy, but—put most simply—WHERE'S THE ROMANCE?!  Romantic comedies are never about just one person, they’re about a relationship… Harold and Maude’s May/December romance (Harold & Maude), Harry and Sally’s friendship (When Harry Met Sally), Ben and Alison’s fears and frustrations facing parenthood (Knocked Up).  You wouldn’t pitch any of those movies by describing just one person… you’d illustrate each of those relationships, bringing it to life so your audience could understand it and—hopefully—see some reflection of their own life in it.  So I’m not even sure it’s POSSIBLE to pitch a romantic comedy where the logline focuses on something other than the dynamic between two characters.  Unfortunately, the American Breakfast logline doesn’t even MENTION another character—so I’m not sure how this is a romantic comedy at all.  (That doesn’t mean it’s NOT a romantic comedy.  Perhaps the logline needs to be revamped to focus on the romantic relationship at the core of the story, or perhaps it’s just mislabeled and it’s not a romantic comedy after all.)

Refocusing the logline on a relationship doesn’t mean you have to ditch the themes of redemption and justice you want to explore… it just means you need to study them through the lens of your story’s particular romance.  Here, for instance, are a couple sample loglines that tell a similar story… but through a more romantic lens:

•  When Mexican-American Carlos is framed for murder in Los Angeles, his only hope of escape is to entrust his life to an impulsive—and gorgeous—female bounty hunter who offers to return him to his Mexican village… as long as he will father her child.

•  When Carlos, a petty pick-pocket, decides to hide out in a Mexican village to escape an unjust robbery sentence, he hopes to live under the radar forever… until Penelope, a headstrong political lobbyist, mistakes him for an old ‘60’s activist and convinces him to join her campaign.


I’m not saying either of those is good—or the story you want to tell—I’m just saying they each focus on a romance… you can see where the comedy will come from… and they don’t completely sacrifice the spirit or themes of the original.

(Having said that, maybe your script ISN’T ultimately meant to be a romantic-comedy—it’s just mislabeled—in which case I’d just remove the label.)


HOLE #2:  I think the other big missing chunk here is… WE NEED TO MORE INFO ABOUT THE VILLAGE HE’S GOING TO.  I know I say this a lot, but all stories—at their core—are about RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS… and if American Breakfast isn’t a traditional romantic comedy about a relationship between two people, it’s CERTAINLY about a relationship between your hero and this village.

For me, there are two ways to go with this, and while neither is better or worse, each path makes it a very different story.  So is this village… A) your hero’s hometown, or is it B) a totally new place?  Here’s the difference…

If the village is your hero’s hometown (like in Beautiful Girls or Ed), he’s returning to a place full of history and “ghosts,” where he already has relationships… and probably damaged relationships he never wanted to return to.  American Breakfast then becomes a redemption story about a guy returning home to repair broken pieces of the life he’d left behind.

But if the village is a totally new place (like in Doc Hollywood, Northern Exposure, or Cars), it becomes a world that opens your hero’s eyes to new people, relationships, and opportunities.  Only in this new land can he shed his “irresponsible” past and become the man he’s always wanted to be.  In this case, American Breakfast becomes a redemption story about an outsider who—thanks to the magic of this special village—washes away the sins of his past to become a whole new person.

Neither of these story-paths is better than the other… but I think choosing one (or another one that I’m not thinking of right now) will help fill out your particular movie and help us understand your main character’s journey.  (I’m also guessing you may know—somewhere in your head—exactly which village it is… it’s just not articulated in the logline.  But if not… think about it; it’s an important question.)

Anyway, Mary—you’re off to a great start, and I hope this feedback is helpful!

Everyone else—if you have a logline or short synopsis you’d like to submit to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to post it in any of the comments sections… or email it to WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.  You can also email me with thoughts, suggestions, or questions about writing, the industry, or anything else!

In the mean time, keep reading… we’ve got some cool stuff coming up: book reviews, movie reviews, reader questions, and more pitch submissions!


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:01:23 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Sunday, October 26, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #6
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys—

Wanted to take some time today to respond to our most recent submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop.  Thanks to Matt for submitting his work, and thanks also to Janine for her thoughtful online response.  Matt, I hope you found Janine’s thoughts helpful, and I just thought I’d add my own two cents.

For those who are new to the discussion, here’s Matt’s synopsis

Title: Downsize This!
Genre: Romantic Comedy

"Love in the Time of Downsizing"

Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in 6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish - and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.

But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric, alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing; he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence - that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate future within the company.

It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident; a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face during these tough economic times.

Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance prize.

In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?


WHAT I LIKE:
I’ll be honest, Matt—I am a total sucker for stories about people trying to get fired.  I think there is something absolutely hilarious about people behaving inappropriately in corporate/work environments.  A couple years ago, CBS and LMNO Productions did a reality show called Fire Me, Please, where employees had to compete to get fired without their bosses catching on.  It was—for all intents and purposes—a miserable failure… but I loved it.  So I think “Downsize This!” begins from a strong comedic starting place… the kind of premise that immediately allows you to brainstorm scores of hilarious scenarios.  

You’ve also given Steve a strong, relatable want… to get fired and get a severance package, which is something we’ve all dreamed of, especially working at jobs we despise.  So right off the bat, you’re in a good place to generate story… you have a fertile premise and a character with a solid objective, both of which put you in a good starting posigion.


WHAT I’D WORK ON:
I agree with Janine’s comments… despite having a strong starting place, I think there are a lot of confusing elements in this synopsis, and they’re muddying both your A-story (Steve trying to get fired) and your B-story (Steve trying to win Alice).

While I obviously haven’t talked to you at all about your story, my sense—simply from readying the synopsis—is that much of the confusion is coming from a flaw in your writing process, and that flaw is this…

I think you’re creating story situations based on things you, the storyteller, WANT to have happen… or things you think SHOULD happen… rather than creating story situations by letting characters and events play out organically.

I know that sounds like a weird note, since we—as storytellers—are obviously in control of our stories and responsible for creative decisions, but being creatively responsible doesn’t necessarily mean we can simply wrench stories and characters in any direction we want; in fact, it often means that while we do indeed CREATE a story, we must also SERVE the story… or, rather, do what is right for the story… make it as relatable, believable, and powerful as possible—even if that means sacrificing things we want to happen.

The reason I say this in regard to “Downsize This” is that while your movie has a wonderful premise, it feels like many of its actions, events, and characters don’t behave in ways that seem honest, familiar, or true to human behavior.  And since your premise is so ripe… and Steve’s want is so strong… your audience immediately has visions of how this story “should” play out.  Thus, when your characters behave in contradiction to those expectations, it makes it very hard to believe in them or their world.  This doesn’t mean your story should be predictable; it just means it needs to operate within the “rules” and expectations of how we believe people would act in the situation you’ve set up.

For instance… Steve is a “miserable, cantankerous SOB” who has been trying to get downsized for a long time.  But instead of firing him—even in “tough economic times”—his company puts him into a six-week “Wellness Program” to change his attitude.  Well, first of all—I’ve never heard of a company that puts troublemakers through their own “attitude rehab.”  Companies may put an employee on probation, but they don’t usually put them through a six-week readjustment program.  Why wouldn’t they just fire Steve?  He’s a bad worker who doesn’t want to be there… why spend six weeks of valuable time, money, and energy trying to “fix” him?

Then, Steve meets Alice… and he INSTANTANEOUSLY becomes a new person: cool, confident and charismatic.  Now, love is a powerful thing… but I’m not sure it can instantly change someone from “miserable” and “cantankerous” to cool, confident and charismatic.  This just doesn’t seem like believable behavior… or at least, none I’ve ever seen in the real world.  First of all—how does Steve change so dramatically so quickly?  Second of all—it’s tough to swallow that such a miserable jerk would so quickly fall in love.  And while you say it’s a “façade,” that confuses things even more: does Steve actually like Alice?  Because if he DOES, then it’s NOT a façade; it’s a sincere attempt to be a better person and win her heart.  And if he doesn’t like her, then why should we care about their relationship?  Or, more importantly, why is she even in the story?

I also don’t buy that Steve’s boss—who knew Steve was such an asshole he had him put in a “wellness program”—would be so instantly duped by his transformation that he would suddenly make Steve the “new face of the company.”  I mean, the boss knew what Steve was like before… so wouldn’t be super-skeptical of this “new Steve?”  Even if he wasn’t skeptical, why would he make this guy—who less than two months earlier was on the verge of getting fired—the “new face” of the company?

Along those same lines, why do all these women who knew the “old Steve” suddenly fall head-over-heels for the “new Steve?”  Most men spend a lifetime trying to find that kind of female-attracting behavior, and Steve—a known misanthrope—suddenly fakes (after meeting ONE GIRL) and all the other women fall for it.  I don’t buy that Steve—or anyone—could do that… and I don’t buy that all these women are stupid enough to fall for it.

Perhaps most importantly, if Steve’s incredible ability to be a brilliant businessman was nestled just below the surface… why didn’t he ever step up before?  I mean, once Steve meets Alice, he becomes a virtual superhero, possessing nearly inhuman business savvy and romantic prowess.  So where were these skills before?  I suppose you could say he hated his job so he never used them, but I don’t believe that someone in possession of these kinds of skills is an antisocial bum.  Why couldn’t he have just gotten another job?  Or why wasn’t he using these skills all along to get ahead, pick up chicks, dupe his boss, etc.?

Now, Matt—I know it seems like I’m really ripping apart every beat of your story here, and in a way I am.  But here’s why I said earlier I think your process is flawed and you’re trying to twist the story in directions it doesn’t want to go…

I can see how each of these moments would work and be funny… in their own movie.  We’ve all seen movies—and will see many more—about losers who acquire business/romantic skills and find themselves catapulted to the top of the social food chain (What Women Want, Love Potion #9).  We’ve all seen movies about guys who work to become different people to win a girl (Hitch).  We’ve seen movies about people pretending to be someone they’re not to get ahead in the corporate world (The Secret of My Success, Working Girl, Taking Care of Business).  We’ve all seen movies that satirize and condemn the corporate world (Office Space).  

So each of your story moments could be very effective, Matt… and I understand why you like them all.  But that doesn’t mean they all belong in the same movie… and combining them seems to blur the story you really want to tell.

My advice: think about the story you really want to tell, the story scratching and clawing its way out of your imagination.  Don’t pick the story you think is the most commercial… or even the most original… or the easiest to shoot on a low-budget… or the easiest to make as a summer tentpole… or the best to get you into film school.  Pick the one story that will haunt you and eat at you if you DON’T tell it.

Once you’ve done that, write your logline.  This isn’t so you an pitch it easily and quickly; it’s so you have—in short sentence form—the core essence of your screenplay. For sake of this example, let’s say your logline is…

“When Steve, a cantankerous misanthrope, learns his company will be laying off its ten lowest-performing employees and giving them severance packages, he becomes determined to under-perform his co-workers, get fired, and use the money to achieve his dream: starting his own comic book store.”

Print this out and tape it above your desk.  As you continue to work, refer back to this logline as often as you need to to make sure your story is laser-focused and not veering off in weird directions.

Next step: brainstorming.  I usually like to do this somewhere other than the place where I do most of my writing.  I’ll go outside… or to the park… or a café… or the swimming pool.  Anywhere where I can feel unconfined and free of the environment where I do most of my other thinking and working.  Personally, I think it’s tough to do “new” thinking when you’re surrounded by “old” environments.

Take a pad and brainstorm all the things Steve might do to try and achieve his goal.   Don’t censor yourself as you write… simply let as many ideas as possible flow from your brain to your pencil and onto the paper.  Never let your pencil stop moving.  Even if you’re scribbling lame, ridiculous ideas… let them come.  A strong premise—whether comedy or drama—should generate a nearly infinite number of ideas.  

Just looking at the above Steve/comic book shop example, I’m gonna do a quick brainstorming session.  Here we go, right off the top of my head…

WAYS STEVE MIGHT TRY TO GET FIRED/LAID OFF
•  Never turn in any work
•  Show up late
•  Sleep with the boss’s wife
•  Sleep with the boss’s daughter
•  Dress like a clown
•  Fart wherever he goes
•  Eat lunch without a fork or spoon—just put his face right in the plate
•  Only communicate by singing
•  Hop everywhere he goes
•  Call his co-workers names
•  Pee himself constantly
•  Wear his clothes backwards
•  Start selling off the office equipment

Now, I’m not saying any of those or good, funny, or even helpful idea.  What I AM saying is this: I typed those in about 30 seconds of spur-of-the-moment thinking.  If you were to spend even just an hour doing this, you’d have HUNDREDS of ideas.

Your job is then to pick the best of those (and by “best,” I mean those that are the most true and honest to Steve’s character, his want, and the world of the story—not those that you most want to happen), and begin to think about what would logically happen if they were to happen.  

For instance, if Steve started communicating only by singing, he’d probably annoy and anger a lot of people… at first.  But then maybe people would grow to like his singing—maybe it’s a cheerful break in an otherwise dreary workplace—and the office would institute musical Fridays, allowing people to play CD’s and listen to radios.  So Steve would need to think of a new tactic.  Perhaps he tries to sleep with his boss’s wife… only to discover that his boss and his wife have an open marriage, and his boss wants to join them.

Again—I’m not saying ANY of these ideas are right for the story you want to tell.  I’m simply trying to concoct examples that are on-point for Steve’s objective and have a cause-effect relationship that seems believable… in both our world and your story-world.

Anyway, Matt—like I said earlier, I think you have a strong comic premise and a character with a great want; my sense is that you simply got sidetracked by subplots and story elements that seemed interesting, but weren’t necessarily integral to your main story.  I even think that as you go back and reconstruct your story, focusing on your A-story, you’ll see how the B-story (the Alice love story) can integrate itself more organically without derailing everything else.

I hope this is helpful info… good luck with project, and lemme know how it goes!

For the rest of you, if you have loglines or summaries you’d like to submit to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com, or simply post them in a “comments section” here on the blog.

In the mean time, we’ve got some great stuff coming up… more Pitch Workshop submissions, book reviews, some great website recommendations, and more questions from readers!

Have a good Sunday!


Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, October 26, 2008 11:33:29 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Friday, October 17, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 5
Posted by Chad

Today's submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Matt in Montreal, who is looking for feedback on his synopsis for his feature idea, Downsize This! (although he's not married to the title).  He also says:

"I'm aiming for a Jim Carrey inspired, farout main Protagonist, contrasted with an even wilder love interest, populated with supporting characters with their own selfish designs...

I'm happy with what I have here, but if you could offer me any specific guidance with how to improve the above synopsis, I would greatly appreciate it."


So please... take a look and post your constructive criticism in the comments section below!  Here's Matt's synopsis... and thanks for submitting, Matt!...


Title: Downsize This!
Genre: Romantic Comedy

"Love in the Time of Downsizing"

Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in 6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish - and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.

But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric, alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing; he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence - that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate future within the company.

It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident; a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face during these tough economic times.

Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance prize.

In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Bookmark and Share
Friday, October 17, 2008 10:20:30 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [4]
# Tuesday, October 14, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 4
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Today’s submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Scott, who submits loglines for two feature ideas.  So before we dive in… Scott—thank you so much for sending these!  The Pitch Workshop is one of my favorite parts of doing this blog, and I always wish people would use it more.  So A) I really appreciate you submitting, and B) I hope this feedback—and the feedback you get from other readers—is helpful as you develop these ideas!

Having said that, let’s get started!  Here are Scott’s loglines…

1) THE SPITCHCOCKS, a feature comedy, is about four friends who form a famous rock band who implode in the most spectacular way. Now they must reunite for the biggest gig of their life.

2) THE DEVIL'S MONEY, a feature crime drama, is about corrupt Mexican police forces who battle during the search for a kidnapped teenager.


Now, normally, I like to look at different ideas separately, but today I want to look at these together, because I think they both have very similar strengths and weaknesses.

STRENGTHS:
One of the best things about both ideas is their strong sense of the “kind of movie” they want to be.  While each is just a logline with few details, I get a definite feel for each film… it’s like I can see snippets of each movie or their trailers… and I also get the sense that Scott, the writer, see much more of the canvas on which these stories are painted.  And that’s a great place for Scott to start from.


WEAKNESSES:
Firstly, Scott-- while both these ideas have great “backdrops,” I’m not sure what the actual STORIES are.  Story comes from a main character (or characters) having an incredibly strong WANT that forces him to take ACTION… and that action places him in conflict with OBSTACLES he must conquer or navigate.  And unfortunately, neither logline details a main character(s), what he/she wants, specific courses of action, or any tangible obstacles the hero might encounter.

Secondly—or maybe hand in hand—the loglines—while good at conveying a “sense of spirit”—are written in such broad generics (“the most spectacular way,” “the biggest gig of their life”) that while I believe YOU have a strong sense of these worlds, it’s tough for me to share in it.  I see MY version of “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life,” but I’m not really sure if my own imagination’s versions are accurate to your vision and story.  And your job, as a writer, is to communicate your own specific vision, not necessarily entice me with what MY vision could be.


So...

SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THESE:

1)  IDENTIFY YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS.  Does The Spitchcocks revolve around Larry, the band’s former lead singer, who wants to help his bandmates heal their animosity so they can reunite for one last enormous gig?  Is it about the drummer, Razor, who wants the band to play a charity concert to raise money for his baby’s life-saving surgery?  Or is it a straight-up ensemble piece… in which you identify the main characters as a unit?  For instance, are they now mid-forties, middle class suburban parents who must suddenly juggle day-jobs and parenting as they attempt to get in shape for a new tour?  Or are they poor late-twenties singles who broke up after a violent falling out?  Are they Midwestern bumpkins who somehow succeeded as a rap band—The Tractor Pulls—in the big city?  Or are they former hair metal rockers now out of place in a hip-hop world?  

Paint a picture of these guys so we can not only see them visually, but we “see” them emotionally and understand how the world looks to them.

The same goes for The Devil’s Money.  Does this story follow one particular cop, like Eric, a righteous cop trying to find a missing child amidst a city run by corruption?  Does it follow Charlie, the kidnapped kid’s father, desperately trying to work with corrupt officials to rescue his son?  Or is it an ensemble piece about District Battalion 89, the most corrupt police force in Mexico City, that must pull together to save this one particular kid?

Whether the story follows one person or a group, giving them a name and a few words of description will help us connect to them.


2)  WHAT DOES THIS MAIN CHARACTER WANT?  I hinted at this above—and specifying his want will also help flesh out your main character—but let us know exactly what your protagonist wants… both “tangibly” and “emotionally.”  Perhaps Norman, your main character in The Spitchcocks, wants to reunite his band so he can win the heart of his true love… a girl who used to be the world’s biggest Spitchcocks fan.  That may not be the story you want to tell, but it DOES give a sense of what Norman wants “tangibly”—A) a girl, and B) to reunite the band—and it lets us know what he wants “emotionally”… true love.  We understand how this onjective will drive Norman to action… and, because it has an emotional engine (we all understand the desire for true love), it allows us to invest emotionally in Norman’s quest.

Similarly, in The Devil’s Money, does your main character simply want to find the missing kid?  Or is your main character Carlos, a police chief who wants to rid his force of corruption… and their newest case—the missing kid—is the one he’s determined to use to rid his force of evil?  Or is your main character Jules, the kid who’s been kidnapped, and he desperately wants to be rescued… but learns the corrupt police force itself is behind his capture?

Whatever you decide for each story, knowing—and articulating—your characters’ wants is the engine that drives the narrative.  Put it up front, big and bold, in both your logline and your actual script.  Without it, the rest of your script is much less effective; but let your audience understand and relate to your hero’s want, and you’ve already taken a huge step toward constructing a successful story.


3)  SPECIFY THE EXACT ACTIONS YOUR MAIN CHARACTER(S) MUST TAKE TO ACCOMPLISH HIS/HER WANT.  The Spitchcocks, for instance, is about a band reuniting… so what tangible actions must be taken for this to succeed?  Do the band members live in different countries, so Hank, the frontman, but physically travel the globe in order to gather them all?  Is the lead singer in jail for pot possession… so your lead character—Toby, the bassist—must break him out and get him to the gig before he’s re-arrested?

In The Devil’s Money, you mention that corrupt cops are searching for a kidnapped kid… and there’s also a war between cops.  While I’m not sure which is your “A-story,” I think this will clear up when you pinpoint your main character’s want.  If the objective is to find the kid, what actions does this entail?  Do they have five internal suspects the main cop, Pepe, must interview, opening a world of corruption and scandal in Pepe’s own department?  Or must Pepe and his partner, Ricky, search for the missing child in Mexico’s dangerous and seedy underworld, which is more (or less) corrupt than the police force itself?


4)  WHAT IS YOUR HERO’S MAIN OBSTACLE?  Like identifying your characters’ wants and actions, we also need to know exactly what is preventing your main character(s) from succeeding.  Why can’t The Spitchcocks simply reunite?  Even if they now live on different continents, why can’t they just hop on a plane and get back together?  What is preventing their actions from accomplishing their goal?  Did the Spitchcocks break up over soapy and unresolved sexual/romantic tensions?  Do they have different artistic visions that constantly cause them to fight?  Does one of them have amnesia that has wiped his memory of all the songs?  

Likewise, how does a battle between corrupt cops interfere with them finding a missing kid?  Are the cops lazy and refuse to work?  Is this the child of an enemy faction’s chief, so the other cops refuse to look for him/her?  Do they not want to find this child because he possesses valuable information that could reveal and punish certain corrupt cops?

Whatever you decide, your obstacle needs to be large and dramatic enough that we immediately understand how it will impede our hero’s journey.  Like your character’s want, the best obstacles aren’t just “tangible” obstacles, they’re also are also “emotional” obstacles, forcing the character to confront something in his/her relationships with other people.  

For example, the reuniting Spitchcocks could be faced with the obstacle that they all live on different continents.  This is, obviously, a huge challenge to their reunion.  But it’s a STRONGER challenge if they live on those different continents because ten years ago, when they were together as a band, the lead singer, Jorge, married the drummer, Carrie, and had an affair with the bassist, Vince.

Lastly, Scott…


5)  AVOID WRITING IN GENERICS LIKE “MOST SPECTACULAR WAY” AND “BIGGEST GIG OF THEIR LIFE.”  Although loglines must use words sparingly, they must also be the right words to communicate your story accurately and with detail.  “Biggest gig of their life” may mean one thing to one reader… and an entirely different thing to another reader.  And what’s most important is that your reader understands what those moments mean to YOU.

Having said that, it doesn’t matter exactly what the Spitchcocks’ “biggest gig” is… or how “spectacularly” the Spitchcocks implode… as long as it’s the biggest “EMOTIONAL” gig of their life and the most “EMOTIONALLY” spectacular implosion they could have.  

For example, you could argue that the “biggest gig of their life” is that they’ve been invited to open for U2 for ONE NIGHT ONLY (the normal opener is out sick), and if it goes well, it could re-launch their career.  This could obviously be “the biggest gig of their life.”  

OR… “the biggest gig of their life” could be this: the lead singer Barry’s daughter is dying, and Barry doesn’t have the money for her surgery… so he reunites the band for a charity concert to raise $500,000 and save his child’s life.  This could also be the “biggest gig of his life.”  And—frankly—it may even be “bigger,” because the stakes are higher.

OR… perhaps The Spitchcocks is a wonky sci-fi comedy, and the band has been kidnapped by an alien race that tells them: “You have 24 hours to put together a concert of entirely new material… or we’ll destroy the planet Earth.”  Silly, I know—but with the right tone it could work… and THAT is certainly the “biggest gig of their life.”

What this basically boils down to, Scott, is your story’s STAKES (what your characters stand to lose if they fail in their quests)… and deciding/understanding what they are.  Once you know that, those are the specifics to plug into the vague holes left by “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life.”


Anyway, Scott, I hope this is helpful!  Feel free to play, shape, mold, rework, tweak, polish… and resubmit.  

In the mean time, if other readers have loglines or summaries for the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to post them here, or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.

In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great posts coming up.  We’ll have more Pitch Workshop submissions… we’ll talk about how to protect your work… we'll help the American Idol writers earn fair pay, residuals, and health benefits… we'll have book reviews… and much, much more!


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:25:56 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Saturday, August 23, 2008
GUEST PERSPECTIVE: How NOT to Write a Screenplay
Posted by Chad

Hey, screenwriters--

I'm excited to present a special guest today... William M. Akers, author of the new screenwriting book, Your Screenplay Sucks! 100 Ways To Make It Great, from Michael Wiese Productions, and... my former screenwriting teacher at Vanderbilt University!

Will was not only a great teacher (and my first screenwriting professor ever), but he's written movies and television for virtually every major network and studio from MGM and Disney to FOX, NBC, and ABC.  He's currently writing a movie for Overture Films which is being directed by Jon Amiel.  This is his first book... and he's done an incredible job. 

Your Screenplay Sucks! is a terrific first outing, not only because it's packed with great info, tips, and insight, but because it has a wonderfully unique approach to working on your script.  First of all, it's a great book to read if you've never written a screenplay and want some terrific first-time-out pointers and help.  But more importantly and uniquely... this is a great book to read if you've already learned-- or are in the process of learning-- how to do it, and want to make sure your script is as good as it can possibly be.

Basically, Your Screenplay Sucks! is a comprehensive checklist of the 100 things screenwriters almost NEVER do... but should.  It pinpoints specific mistakes writers make-- such as "you don't have a killer first page" or "you haven't buried exposition like Jimmy Hoffa" or "you call shots"-- which makes it easy to focus in on specific aspects of your script and punch them up.  And because it's in checklist form, you can just go down the list, looking at and improving each aspect until you've whipped your screenplay into shape.

Also, this book doesn't use kid gloves.  It doesn't coddle you and give you warm-your-heart artistic advice like "listen to your heart" or "find the hidden writer within."  This book is designed to pummel mistakes out of your script until it's better.  It has sections like "you didn't run your spellcheck, you moron!" and "you blew your first ten pages! Arggggghhhhh!" and "you think your script is special and rules don't apply."  Many of the mistakes are mistakes screenwriters at all levels continue to make.  As such, it doesn't pull punches... it ribs you, goads you, and takes your script to task until its better (which, even in and of itself, is a great lesson in writing with "voice"). 

So do yourself a favor... head to your nearest bookstore, or click HERE to go to Amazon, and grab yourself a copy of Your Screenplay Sucks!  But first... check out the interview I did this week with Will... you'll learn a bit more about him, the book, and writing in general...


Will... you have a unique career, because you write and teach… and you do both far from the madding crowds of Hollywood.  So let’s begin by learning your path.  Tell me how you started writing professionally… and how you got to where you are today.

When I was in the third grade, my teacher would read to us after lunch.  My favorite book was The Wolves of Willoughby Chase, an English adventure with wolves, sleighs in the snow, and little girls and a wicked governess who kills their parents for their money.  After I got out of USC grad school, I knew I wanted to write, so I looked at things that had been eating at me for a long time, (which make the best subjects for screenplays, btw) and I had never forgotten the book that had been read to me as a child.  I ended up optioning it.  Nine months later, I had a screenplay.  It was produced by Zenith Productions in London.  It found a home on the Disney Channel and I was nominated for a CableAce.  Actually, that wasn’t my first professional gig.  Haven’t thought of this in a while.  When I was still at USC, I was sitting outside the chairman’s office telling stories to his assistant and he came out of his office, pointed at me and said, “Are you a writer?”  I said, “Sure.”  He said, “Come in my office.”  He didn’t know my name.  Someone had called, a manager for child actors, and wanted USC’s best writing student to write a screenplay for one of his clients.  The chairman told him he had just the writer in mind, opened his door, and saw me.  I got paid $1,500 dollars.  Needless to say, the movie never got made.  I love the idea that this manager thought the chairman went through some involved search to get to me, their “best writing student” and he didn’t even know my name.  Easiest way I ever got a job. 

After the first job, I had to get the next one.  I’ve always had an agent in Los Angeles, and if you live out of town, it helps.  But, you can’t sit around waiting for your agent to land you a job.  You have to go out and beat the bushes.  I’ve sold pitches, sold spec scripts, and been hired on assignment.  Every year is different.  Some years, I haven’t worked at all.  It helps to have no credit card debt and as small a house note as possible!  Even when I’m not getting paid to write, I’m still writing spec material.  I tend to write every day, so after a while, that’s a lot of pages.  It’s been a hodgepodge of trying to get work, and failing, and wasting time, and being lucky, and writing and writing and writing.  Sometimes it works and most times it doesn’t.  The key is that you have to enjoy it even when it’s not working.

Right now, I’m rewriting a spec I sold.  Done eleven drafts for the producers in nearly two years.  The script is about the fall of Saigon.  Jon Amiel is directing it, and, under his aegis, the script has only gotten better.  “Development paradise” is not a phrase you often hear, but it applies to this one.  I just sold a pitch about a cop in London, based on a true story, and am waiting for the contracts to be negotiated before I start work.  So there is a bit of activity here and there...


You’ve written and sold numerous screenplays, and now you’ve published a book about screenwriting.  One of the things that makes this book unique is its approach and tone.  It’s not a how-to book for beginners trying their first screenplay; it’s an in-your-face pummeling for people who have written a few scripts and want to whip them into shape.  It doesn’t pull punches or wear kiddie gloves; it’s a brutally honest assessment of the 100 biggest mistakes you see in beginners’ screenplays.  So what compelled you, when you already have a successful screenwriting career, to write this book?  And how did you decide on its unique voice and checklist format?

First of all, Your Screenplay Sucks! is aimed at both beginning and more experienced writers.  There’s a lot in there about generating an idea and how to develop characters and especially what I call “physical writing” -- how to write a clean sentence that actually tells the reader what you think it means... That’s useful to a writer just starting her first script, and you don’t often see it covered in books.  As for experienced writers, I’ve heard from people who’ve been selling material for twenty years who said the book reminded them of stuff they had forgotten they were supposed to be doing.  Anybody who is contemplating starting a script, or rewriting one, can benefit.  So much for the commercial plug. 

As to where it came from, I wrote it in self defense.  I’ve been critiquing screenplays for a long time, and I found that beginning writers all make the same mistakes.  Over and over and over and over.  So, I thought to create a checklist so the writer could do all this boilerplate stuff I had to tell every client about, and then send me their script so I could hammer them on structure and character instead of “don’t have character names that rhyme,” “take out thes and thats,” “make your prose crystal clear,” and “beware of research...”  The book’s voice is my voice.  I dictated the first draft of the book, so it’s a breezy read and, for a screenwriting book, pretty funny.


How did the process of writing a book differ from the process of writing a screenplay?  What surprised you about the differences in writing a book?

I wrote a table of contents and a few chapters, sent it to the publisher, and they said “Go for it.” Once I knew it was going to be published, it was a complete blast to write.  Like writing a movie, I suppose, where you know the producer has a put deal.  Not that that’s ever happened to me... I basically wrote it for myself and had fun.  I put in there whatever the hell I thought would be helpful, and that’s what came out the other end.  No development hell.  I rewrote it a lot, but what’s there is what I wanted.  A lot easier than writing a screenplay, that’s for sure.  What surprised me is how much fun I had writing it.


Now that you’ve finished the book and returned to screenwriting, how has going through the book-writing process helped your screenwriting chops and process?  Or has it?


Interesting question.  Act III of the book is about selling your screenplay and dealing with producers and Hollywood, and I have found myself trying to take my own advice.  Weird, huh?  All the painstaking work I did on the rewriting section of the book has helped my first drafts.  There is so much in the book about being clear and concise, that writing it rubbed off on my own work.  


You’ve done what few people are able to do… maintain a successful screenwriting career while living far from the heart of Los Angeles.  How do you do this?  What advice do you have for screenwriters and aspirants who don’t live—or can’t get to—Los Angeles?

Horrible question.  Do you actually want the truth?  It’s a bitch-willy to write and not live in L.A..  I lived there three years as a grad student in film school.  Then three more years getting my career going.  I’m still dining off those six years of living in Los Angeles full time.  For six more years after that, I kept an apartment in West Hollywood and commuted regularly until my sharp-fanged, drooling landlord figured out a way to throw me out.  So, I did put in my time in L.A.  Living someplace else, lobbing scripts at Los Angeles, hoping someone will notice is, if you want my opinion, a fool’s paradise.  You don’t want to confuse hope with denial.  You can win a contest and get discovered, but that’s not easy.  Every agent I’ve ever had came because a friend held a gun to their head, handed them a script and said, “Read this.  This guy walks on water.”  I never had a single query letter answered.  Not one. 

Okay, so much for the depressing part... Now for the advice.  Figure out a way to get to Los Angeles, regularly. Find people who live there who you can meet.  Facebook.  Network.  Lie.  Use the internet.  Use the Creative Directory.  Talk to 18 year old kids about how to do it.  Take a marketing person to lunch and squeeze them dry for free.  Get out there somehow.  Or, get your material out there. 

Of course, the single best (and essential) thing you can do is to write a great screenplay.  Not a good one, either, mind you.  There’re lots of them all over.  In gutters.  Being used to clean windshields at gas stations.  L.A. is lousy with good scripts.  Any jackass can write a good screenplay.  But, keep in mind, they’re not interested in good scripts, only great ones.  So write a great one.  If it takes you three years, so be it.  If your script is great, people will pass your material on to someone they know because it makes them look good.  Great material will open doors. 

Remember, that if you ever do meet someone “real” who is in a position to pass your script on to someone else, your script has to be bulletproof.  You will only get one read.  If it’s not fantastic, they will never read anything from you again.  You have to make it perfect.  Hence the crying need for writers to buy my book or hire me to crit their script before it’s too late! 


You teach college students, so you’re often working with young writers just starting to experiment with screenwriting and storytelling.  What are the top three mistakes you see beginning writers make?

They don’t have a breathtakingly original, wildly creative, non-derivative idea.  They put the backstory in the first act.  They don’t take the time to pare down the scene description and dialogue to the bare stark-white bones.  They have character names that rhyme or start with the same letter.  Their bad guy is poorly constructed.  They don’t separate out the characters’s voices.  They didn’t throw out the first twenty pages.  They don’t have a clue how the motion picture or television business operates.  They are arrogant and think the rules don’t apply.  They argue when you give them notes.  They don’t keep the reader in mind when they are writing.  Those’re probably the top three mistakes.


Your Screenplay Sucks! details 100 mistakes you see aspiring screenwriters make in their projects.  But what are the biggest mistakes you’ve made… both in your actual writing and your career… and what have you learned from them?

Biggest mistake I ever made was when a producer wanted to make a script of mine and I told him... “No.”  The script was autobiographical and I wanted to direct it myself.  Idiot.  The instant I said I was attached to direct, the script died and that was that.  The producer had the financing and everything in place to make the movie and I, moron that I was, didn’t let him make my movie.  I still own the script.  It sits on a shelf, sneering at me.

In my writing, there is not a writing mistake I have not made.  Repeatedly.  I’ve done everything wrong there is to do, but not in the draft I handed in.  I tried to correct the mistakes before I showed the material to anybody in the business.

Another gigantic mistake I’ve made is to allow my heart to rule my head when it comes to choosing material.  The longer I take to decide what to write, the better off I am.  Just because I think it’s a great idea and is something that will easily sell, doesn’t mean it will sell.  I have an eclectic personality, and that is doom when it comes to choosing material.  No one is a master of all genres, and you need to pick the one or two you’re good at and stick with them.  I’ve never written the same thing twice, and that’s a hindrance.  Better to find a groove and stay in it.


Screenwriting is a collaborative art form; screenwriters must know how to work and get along with directors, producers, designers, actors, etc.  Having given screenwriters the 100 mistakes made when writing a script… what are the top three mistakes screenwriters often make during the rest of the production process, when dealing with all the other people and parts of making a movie?

It’s tricky to deal with a producer and their notes.  You want to do the notes that will help the script while tactfully forgetting the ones that are destructive.  Bear in mind that no one, at least I tell myself this, no one is trying to destroy your screenplay, but sometimes people who don’t have a great story sense will give you a note that sounds like a good idea to them, but, if executed, will eventually cause the entire house of cards that is the story, to collapse. 

You have to listen, to everybody, and figure out how to deal with what they say they want.  Sometimes it’s not what they really mean, because they don’t know what they really mean.  That makes it tougher.

Being arrogant is death.  You are not in charge and your goal is to get your story told... not rigorously protect the material from people you may see as Visigoths.  Producers loathe writers who guard every word like it’s sacrosanct.  Don’t fight for every phrase like it’s Omaha Beach.  They’re just trying to help you make your movie.  A movie in a theater that you wrote, that got changed some, is far more valuable and interesting to your career than a screenplay that is 100% unaltered... but that never got made...!  They are paying you to execute the notes, so don’t be a brat.

I just had dinner with a guy who had investors for a project and $20 million to fund it.  They flew in a private jet to meet the writers and tell them the changes they wanted done so they could pull the trigger.  The writers refused to change anything.  The investors got on their plane and flew away.  And the writers still... control... their material!  Whaddya bet their wives aren’t too happy with them?

A simple thing about notes is to write it all down, when you’re in the meeting.  Don’t trust memory.  Write it down, then decide later what you’re going to do and not do.  If you take killer notes, at least you’ll come out of the meeting knowing precisely what was discussed.  I take my laptop to every meeting, so I walk away knowing what was said.  Then I have a checklist to go through.


You have a unique career, because half your career is dedicated to teaching young writers to write.  And as you say in the dedication of your book, you’ve learned a ton from your students.  So… what have you learned from your students?  What has teaching taught you that makes you a better writer?

By correcting their mistakes, I am reminded not to make those mistakes in my writing.  Their enthusiasm for what they are doing is always contagious, so their fire for the work constantly fuels my own.  I’ve written screenplays with my students, too, and that’s a great way to learn.  Plus, it’s fun to hang out with people younger than I am.  They have different world views and opinions and listen to better music.



Books Tools Resources | Career Advice | Guest Perspectives | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing Advice
Bookmark and Share
Saturday, August 23, 2008 5:46:19 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Top 10 Ways To Win Writers Digest's Annual Screenwriting Contest - Part II
Posted by Chad

And here's the conclusion to this weekend's post, the TOP 5 WAYS TO WIN WRITERS DIGEST's annual screenwriting contest...

5)  STAGE DIRECTIONS – PART II.  Do not over-write descriptions in your stage directions.  Give the reader only the bare minimum of what he/she needs to know in order to understand your story.  Elaborate scenic descriptions, character profiles, or visuals of props and costumes have no place in a screenplay… no matter how colorfully you see these things in your head.  If you enjoy writing these elements, put them in a novel or short story.

4)  DIALOGUE.  Do NOT write long chunks of dialogue.  Like with stage directions, try to keep each paragraph of dialogue under 3 lines.  Sometimes, obviously, you’ll need more… if someone is ranting or lecturing… but dialogue should be short and snappy.  (And real people rarely speak in long chucks; actual dialogue tends to be in quick exchanges.)

3)  VOICE-OVER.  If you’re going to use voice-over, use it VERY sparingly.  Many writers believe V.O. is a crutch used to avoid dramatizing story.  I don’t necessarily agree with this—there are many stories that use voice-over to great effect—but it’s often easy for it to BECOME a crutch, to use a character’s voice-over to set the stage, color the world, or give us exposition that isn’t necessary to the story.  Some entries began with two, three, or four pages of one character’s V.O., and even without reading it, seeing this is as much of a turnoff as pages of stage description.  Treat V.O. like any other piece of dialogue… it should be short and to the point.

2)  SOUNDING CONTEMPORARY.  Do NOT worry about making characters sound “cool” or “contemporary” at the risk of honesty.  In other words, don’t use slang or speech patterns if you don’t use them naturally.  There were many entries where writers seemed to be writing about foreign places, people, etc.  This is fine—the whole point of storytelling is to transport the reader (and writer!) to new places—but capturing accurate speech patterns is less important than capturing emotional honesty.  So if your story is set on the streets of Watts or in the backwoods of Georgia… but you’ve never been to those places… don’t try to recreate your version of street slang or southern drawl.  You’ll be much more convincing if you accurately convey how your characters FEEL—even if their speech is totally inaccurate—than if you throw in a bunch of misused colloquialisms.

1)  WRITE WHAT YOU KNOW.  I know we all hear this a lot, but this does NOT mean you should write something autobiographical… or you shouldn’t set something in a faraway time or place.  It means “write what you know EMOTIONALLY,” and be honest about it.  If you’re writing about a medieval knight who longs to leave his home and family to see the world, tap into what you dislike about your own home.  Listen to fights you have with your family and transcribe them into your script.  Many entries were set in interesting places, but they didn’t seem to reflect any emotional reality in the writer’s life; they didn’t ring with the truth of universal emotions.  We all experience love, loss, grief, elation, melancholy, wistfulness… and while we all have our own life experiences, the experiences of these emotions are usually identical.  The more honestly you can type into your own feelings, the more strongly we connect to your writing and see it as a reflection of our own lives.


Career Advice | Jobs Contests Opportunities | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing Advice | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:09:59 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Sunday, July 27, 2008
Top 10 Ways To Win Writers Digest's Annual Screenwriting Contest - Part I
Posted by Chad

Writers Digest’s annual writing contest is in full swing… fiction, poetry, non-fiction… and, of course, screenwriting.  I’ve been judging the screenwriting division for the past few years, and I always love it—it’s a blast reading and discovering new talent.  And this year is no different, so I’ve been poring over hundreds of scripts, many of which are really good.

Unfortunately, not all scripts can be terrific, and I often notice that the not-so-terrific ones are not-so-terrific for the exact same reasons.  In fact, many of these scripts COULD be terrific, but they fall into certain traps that keep them from being as good as they could/should be.

So I wanted to dedicate a couple blog posts to the WD writers contest… and how to give yourself the best possible chance of winning.  So here’s Part One of…

THE TOP 10 WAYS TO WIN WD’S ANNUAL SCREENWRITING CONTEST - PART I


10)  YOUR SYNOPSIS.  Writers Digest asks you to submit a synopsis along with your script.  Do NOT write a full-page, single-spaced, tiny-font synopsis.  The purpose of the synopsis is to give a QUICK overview of the story; not detail every plot turn.  Thus, your synopsis should be one tight paragraph.  When I see more than that, I rarely read it… and it tells me the writer doesn’t know how to tell his/her story quickly and succinctly.

9)  FORMAT.  Make sure your screenplay is in PROPER SCREENPLAY FORMAT.  I’m always stunned at how many entries aren’t written in standard script format; some are written as plays, some are single-spaced without tabs, others just make up their own format.  Here’s the thing: if your screenplay is NOT in standard format, it’ll be glanced at, but its chances of winning are greatly diminished.  And in a real-life situation, an exec or producer probably won’t read it at all; it’ll just go in the trash.  I know this seems nitpicky and harsh, but in an age where everyone is only moments away from the Internet, a library, or a bookstore, there’s no excuse for not having proper formatting.  (And with software like Final Draft or Movie Magic Screenwriter, the computer formats the script for you.)

8)  YOUR FIRST PAGE – PART I.  Even before I actually begin reading your first page, I’m judging your script.  If your first page consists entirely of stage directions, it looks dense, daunting, and uninviting.  To be honest, I probably won’t even read the whole thing or make it to page two.  This is true in the real world as well; execs and producers are looking for any reason to not turn the page, and a big paragraphs of stage directions are a great one.

7)  YOUR FIRST PAGE – PART II.  Jump into major conflict on your first page.  Do NOT take time to “set the stage.”  Jump into action, dialogue, and conflict at the top of page one.  It’s a gross misnomer that stories need a few pages to establish the main characters or setting.  Not only do we rarely need this info in order to start a story, but it’s more effectively conveyed if it comes through as we watch the action/conflict unfold.  If you begin by “setting the stage,” I promise you: your reader will be bored by page two.

6)  STAGE DIRECTIONS – PART I. Do NOT write huge paragraphs of stage description.  I try to never write stage directions over 3 lines long.  If I need more, I’ll OCCASIONALLY go to 4 lines… but never more.  If you still need more, break it up into different paragraphs.  But few things turn readers off more than seeing massive chunks of stage direction.  (And the truth is: you DON’T need more than 3 lines.  The job of stage directions is to give us only info and action we MUST know to follow the story; don’t waste your readers’ time with detailed descriptions of people, places, clothing, etc.)

Stay tuned for the next five tips... have a good weekend!

Chad


Career Advice | Jobs Contests Opportunities | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing Advice | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, July 27, 2008 9:09:18 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Saturday, July 05, 2008
A Few Moments with Diablo Cody
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

Happy Fourth of July weekend!  I wanted to point you all to my interview with Diablo Cody, the Academy-Award-winning screenwriter of Juno, which appears in this month's issue of Writers Digest.  Diablo was one of the most fun interviews I've done, and she's got some terrific insights into screenwriting... take a look HERE!

In the mean time, have a great weekend!...

Chad


Career Advice | Fun Stuff | Guest Perspectives | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing Advice | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Saturday, July 05, 2008 7:59:31 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [2]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links