Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<November 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456

Blogroll

 ...By Ken Levine
The world as seen by a TV comedy writer
 Brian A. Klems' Questions & Quandaries
Let this WD columnist answer your most pressing grammatical, ethical, business and writing-related questions.
 Children's Writer's & Illustrator's Market blog
 Chuck Sambuchino's Agents Blog
 Complications Ensue: The Crafty TV and Screenwriting Blog
The craft of screenwriting for tv and movies by a working screenwriter... with forays into life and political theater.
 Daily Script
A huge online of screenplays and TV scripts... often including different drafts of the scripts!
 Deadline Hollywood Daily
News for, and from, industry insiders... by L.A. Weekly columnist/blogger Nikki Finke
 Drew's Script-O-Rama
Hundreds of downloadable TV scripts and movie screenplays
 FishbowlLA
A blog about the Hollywood creative community and L.A. media
 Internet Movie Script Database
Produced movie scripts to read online
 Jane Espenson.com
A terrific blog from "Buffy" and "Battlestar Galactica" writer Jane Espenson, who offers everything from practical advice to writing tips to Hollywood commentary.
 John August.com
A ton of useful information about screenwriting... from the writer of "Corpse Bride," "Charlie & the Chocolate Factory," and "Charlie's Angels"
 Kung Fu Monkey
Hollywood commentary from screenwriter/producer John Rogers (Catwoman, Cosby, Transformers)
 Maria Schneider's The Writer's Perspective
 Morning Call Time
The only daily podcast designed specifically for the entertainment industry! We not only give you today's industry headlines... we tell you how the trades are reporting them.
 News From Me
Mark Evanier's blog about TV, movies, comics, theater, news, politics, and other forms of fantasy
 Novel & Short Story Writer's Market blog
 Past Deadline
Hollywood commentary from columnist/reviewer Ray Richmond (The Hollywood Reporter, The Pulse)
 Poetic Asides
 Script City
A great site where you can buy produced scripts for hundreds of produced movies and TV episodes (they also have various drafts of different scripts)
 Simply Scripts
Tons of free downloadable screenplays and TV scripts
 The Artful Writer
Information, theory, and debate for the professional television and film writer
 The Thinking Writer
"A conversation about screenwriting" with a bonafide ntertainment lawyer and screenwriter
 The Unknown Screenwriter
A wonderful (and bit mysterious) meeting place for screenwriters looking for writing tips, Hollywood business advice, or fun commentary on the art and craft of screenwriting.
 This Writer's Life by Kevin Alexander
 TV by the Numbers
Daily TV ratings, analysis, and commentary
 Without A Box
Streamlines the distribution process both for filmmakers seeking contests, festivals, & distribution and for distributors searching for content
 Wordplay
Screenwriters Ted Elliott & Terry Rosso (Aladdin, Shrek, Pirates of the Caribbean) offer advice on everything from the art of screenwriting to the science of pitching. They also have guest writers like Walter Parkes and Nina Jacobson.



 Friday, November 14, 2008
TV Writing Interview: Part III... Take a Listen
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Here's the third part of the 3-part podcast interview I did with Judith Parker Harris and the Alive! Authors Network.  Take a listen... we talk about the politics and logistics of being a TV writer, frequent mistakes aspiring writers make, and how to break in and launch a successful career.

Click HERE to check it out!

(And here's Part I and Part II...)

And coming up, we've got some great reader questions... book reviews... and more pitch workshop entries!


Career Advice | Digital Media and Web Series | Fun Stuff | Interesting Talking Points | Writing Advice
11/14/2008 7:17:31 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Thursday, November 06, 2008
Best Book Recommendation EVER!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

I'm super-psyched to announce that my new (and first) book, Small Screen, Big Picture: A Writer's Guide to the TV Business (which officially comes out November 25), is now available for pre-order on Amazon, Borders, and Barnes & Noble!

The book is a user-friendly "business guide" for aspiring TV writers.  It explains the differences between networks, studios, and production companies... how TV series make money... the new show development and production process... and how all this affects the creative process.  It then talks about what happens in a writers room... how to break in and get your first writing job... and how to survive once you're there.

It also features interviews with almost 200 working TV professionals... network and studio executives from almost every network and studio (NBC, ABC, FOX, the CW, TNT, Comedy Central, E!, you name it)... showrunners, writers, and producers from all your favorite shows (Lost, Psych, Dexter, Life, Army Wives, Alias, Prison Break, Buffy, 24... and more)... and agents from Hollywood's top TV agencies (UTA, ICM, APA, Gersh, etc.).  

Now, granted, I’m biased, but if you’re an aspiring TV writer… or even just love television and learning how it works… I think/hope this is a really helpful, important book.  Most books focus on the creative aspects of being a TV writer: how to write comedy, how to structure a pilot, how to pitch a show, etc.  Small Screen, Big Picture looks at these things… but from a business perspective: what executives really want, how to design a show that will be profitable for its studio, what agents need to get you work, etc.

So please… take a look… and lemme know what you think!





Books Tools Resources | Career Advice | Fun Stuff | Writing Advice | Writing TV
11/6/2008 5:00:31 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Sunday, November 02, 2008
TV Writing Interview: Part II... Take a Listen!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

A couple weeks ago, the Alive! Authors Network posted the first part of Breaking In and Breaking Through the TV Business, Judith Parker Harris's 3-part interview with me about TV writing... how to get your foot in the door, get noticed, and excel in the world of television.

Well, Judith has now posted Part II... so please CLICK HERE take a listen to the next installment, and lemme know what you think! 

In the mean time, have a great weekend... enjoy your extra hour... and Part III will be up soon!


Career Advice | Digital Media and Web Series | Fun Stuff | Interesting Talking Points | Writing Advice
11/2/2008 7:23:02 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Chatting About TV Writing... Take a Listen!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Just wanted to invite you all to listen to a recent podcast interview I did on the Alive! Authors Network... all about TV writing and the TV industry.

This is the first of a 3-part interview I did, called Breaking In and Breaking Through the TV Business, with podcast host Judith Parker Harris.  We talk about finding your own voice, common mistakes, ageism in Hollywood, how to deal with criticism, show business myths and misnomers... and more!

Click HERE to go to the podcast...

Take a listen and lemme know what you think... the next two segments will be available over the next few weeks!


Career Advice | Digital Media and Web Series | Fun Stuff | Interesting Talking Points | Writing Advice
10/21/2008 1:47:10 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
 Thursday, October 16, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP/READER QUESTION: The Importance of Loglines
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Just wanted to give a quick follow-up to Tuesday’s episode of the Script Notes Pitch Workshop… and an answer to a question asked by Scott, the author of Tuesday’s Pitch Workshop entries.  Scott writes:

“Wow, thank you so much for all your help. You are completely right, I know what the story is about but I have not explained that. I think i just found it so hard to distill my ideas into one or two sentences that I end up just writing generic lines.

Should I expand them a bit beyond two sentences? Or should I focus more on keeping it short but packing more information in? I could write a paragraph which would be a lot simpler and easier to read, but I dont want to write too much.”


Scott… I’m so glad you asked, because I get this question a lot: some version of “I can’t distill my story idea into just one sentence,” or “My story is too complicated to be condensed into a single line.”

It’s a common challenge… every writer goes through it… but here’s my answer… (and I’m gonna sound like an asshole when I say this, so I’m just gonna say it)…

If you can’t distill your story into a single sentence, you don’t yet know what your story IS.

Now, I know what you’re thinking… “Of course, I know what my story is… it’s my story… how would you know if I know it or not?!”  But bare with me…

There’s not a story in the world that can’t be boiled down to one sentence.  The Iliad, Citizen Kane, A Rose For Emily, The Office, Freddy Vs. Jason, Dragnet… every tale in the history of the world can be told in a single line.  Take a look…

•  Kim, a twentysomething recovering drug addict, must confront the ghosts of her family’s past when she returns home from rehab the week of her sister’s wedding.  (Rachel Getting Married)

•  Liz, a thirtysomething TV writer, attempts to maintain her artistic integrity, vision, and sense of self as she produces a sketch show under the aegis of a massive commercial corporation.  (30 Rock)

•  When terrorists kidnap the president and take over the White House, Mitch Rapp—a level-headed, tough-as-nails secret agent—must single-handedly do what the ineffectual U.S. government can not: infiltrate the White House, rescue the president, and defeat the terrorists. (Transfer of Power)

Now, these loglines aren’t necessarily perfect, but I do think they sift out each story’s essence: the story’s main character, what that character wants, obstacles in her path, and a sense of how the story works emotionally.

So being able to write a logline isn’t just developing a sales tool, a succinct blip to quickly communicate your story… it’s an exercise to help YOU understand the basic nut of your story, it’s primary narrative and emotional engine.  

THIS is the most important purpose of the logline… to laser-focus you on the core of your story.  Which is why I say: if you can’t tell your story in a single logline, you don’t yet know what that core is.  

Perhaps you’re trying to tell too many stories at once… perhaps you don’t fully understand your main character… but until you can articulate your story in one tight sentence, you still have some developing and pre-writing to do.

Anyway, Scott… I hope this helps (without sound too asshole-y)… and please keep reading and posting!  Coming up in the next few days, we have more Pitch Workshop entries, new movie reviews, some great new websites, and more!

Chad


Pitching | Reader Questions | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
10/16/2008 2:42:17 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3]
 Tuesday, October 14, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 4
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Today’s submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Scott, who submits loglines for two feature ideas.  So before we dive in… Scott—thank you so much for sending these!  The Pitch Workshop is one of my favorite parts of doing this blog, and I always wish people would use it more.  So A) I really appreciate you submitting, and B) I hope this feedback—and the feedback you get from other readers—is helpful as you develop these ideas!

Having said that, let’s get started!  Here are Scott’s loglines…

1) THE SPITCHCOCKS, a feature comedy, is about four friends who form a famous rock band who implode in the most spectacular way. Now they must reunite for the biggest gig of their life.

2) THE DEVIL'S MONEY, a feature crime drama, is about corrupt Mexican police forces who battle during the search for a kidnapped teenager.


Now, normally, I like to look at different ideas separately, but today I want to look at these together, because I think they both have very similar strengths and weaknesses.

STRENGTHS:
One of the best things about both ideas is their strong sense of the “kind of movie” they want to be.  While each is just a logline with few details, I get a definite feel for each film… it’s like I can see snippets of each movie or their trailers… and I also get the sense that Scott, the writer, see much more of the canvas on which these stories are painted.  And that’s a great place for Scott to start from.


WEAKNESSES:
Firstly, Scott-- while both these ideas have great “backdrops,” I’m not sure what the actual STORIES are.  Story comes from a main character (or characters) having an incredibly strong WANT that forces him to take ACTION… and that action places him in conflict with OBSTACLES he must conquer or navigate.  And unfortunately, neither logline details a main character(s), what he/she wants, specific courses of action, or any tangible obstacles the hero might encounter.

Secondly—or maybe hand in hand—the loglines—while good at conveying a “sense of spirit”—are written in such broad generics (“the most spectacular way,” “the biggest gig of their life”) that while I believe YOU have a strong sense of these worlds, it’s tough for me to share in it.  I see MY version of “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life,” but I’m not really sure if my own imagination’s versions are accurate to your vision and story.  And your job, as a writer, is to communicate your own specific vision, not necessarily entice me with what MY vision could be.


So...

SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THESE:

1)  IDENTIFY YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS.  Does The Spitchcocks revolve around Larry, the band’s former lead singer, who wants to help his bandmates heal their animosity so they can reunite for one last enormous gig?  Is it about the drummer, Razor, who wants the band to play a charity concert to raise money for his baby’s life-saving surgery?  Or is it a straight-up ensemble piece… in which you identify the main characters as a unit?  For instance, are they now mid-forties, middle class suburban parents who must suddenly juggle day-jobs and parenting as they attempt to get in shape for a new tour?  Or are they poor late-twenties singles who broke up after a violent falling out?  Are they Midwestern bumpkins who somehow succeeded as a rap band—The Tractor Pulls—in the big city?  Or are they former hair metal rockers now out of place in a hip-hop world?  

Paint a picture of these guys so we can not only see them visually, but we “see” them emotionally and understand how the world looks to them.

The same goes for The Devil’s Money.  Does this story follow one particular cop, like Eric, a righteous cop trying to find a missing child amidst a city run by corruption?  Does it follow Charlie, the kidnapped kid’s father, desperately trying to work with corrupt officials to rescue his son?  Or is it an ensemble piece about District Battalion 89, the most corrupt police force in Mexico City, that must pull together to save this one particular kid?

Whether the story follows one person or a group, giving them a name and a few words of description will help us connect to them.


2)  WHAT DOES THIS MAIN CHARACTER WANT?  I hinted at this above—and specifying his want will also help flesh out your main character—but let us know exactly what your protagonist wants… both “tangibly” and “emotionally.”  Perhaps Norman, your main character in The Spitchcocks, wants to reunite his band so he can win the heart of his true love… a girl who used to be the world’s biggest Spitchcocks fan.  That may not be the story you want to tell, but it DOES give a sense of what Norman wants “tangibly”—A) a girl, and B) to reunite the band—and it lets us know what he wants “emotionally”… true love.  We understand how this onjective will drive Norman to action… and, because it has an emotional engine (we all understand the desire for true love), it allows us to invest emotionally in Norman’s quest.

Similarly, in The Devil’s Money, does your main character simply want to find the missing kid?  Or is your main character Carlos, a police chief who wants to rid his force of corruption… and their newest case—the missing kid—is the one he’s determined to use to rid his force of evil?  Or is your main character Jules, the kid who’s been kidnapped, and he desperately wants to be rescued… but learns the corrupt police force itself is behind his capture?

Whatever you decide for each story, knowing—and articulating—your characters’ wants is the engine that drives the narrative.  Put it up front, big and bold, in both your logline and your actual script.  Without it, the rest of your script is much less effective; but let your audience understand and relate to your hero’s want, and you’ve already taken a huge step toward constructing a successful story.


3)  SPECIFY THE EXACT ACTIONS YOUR MAIN CHARACTER(S) MUST TAKE TO ACCOMPLISH HIS/HER WANT.  The Spitchcocks, for instance, is about a band reuniting… so what tangible actions must be taken for this to succeed?  Do the band members live in different countries, so Hank, the frontman, but physically travel the globe in order to gather them all?  Is the lead singer in jail for pot possession… so your lead character—Toby, the bassist—must break him out and get him to the gig before he’s re-arrested?

In The Devil’s Money, you mention that corrupt cops are searching for a kidnapped kid… and there’s also a war between cops.  While I’m not sure which is your “A-story,” I think this will clear up when you pinpoint your main character’s want.  If the objective is to find the kid, what actions does this entail?  Do they have five internal suspects the main cop, Pepe, must interview, opening a world of corruption and scandal in Pepe’s own department?  Or must Pepe and his partner, Ricky, search for the missing child in Mexico’s dangerous and seedy underworld, which is more (or less) corrupt than the police force itself?


4)  WHAT IS YOUR HERO’S MAIN OBSTACLE?  Like identifying your characters’ wants and actions, we also need to know exactly what is preventing your main character(s) from succeeding.  Why can’t The Spitchcocks simply reunite?  Even if they now live on different continents, why can’t they just hop on a plane and get back together?  What is preventing their actions from accomplishing their goal?  Did the Spitchcocks break up over soapy and unresolved sexual/romantic tensions?  Do they have different artistic visions that constantly cause them to fight?  Does one of them have amnesia that has wiped his memory of all the songs?  

Likewise, how does a battle between corrupt cops interfere with them finding a missing kid?  Are the cops lazy and refuse to work?  Is this the child of an enemy faction’s chief, so the other cops refuse to look for him/her?  Do they not want to find this child because he possesses valuable information that could reveal and punish certain corrupt cops?

Whatever you decide, your obstacle needs to be large and dramatic enough that we immediately understand how it will impede our hero’s journey.  Like your character’s want, the best obstacles aren’t just “tangible” obstacles, they’re also are also “emotional” obstacles, forcing the character to confront something in his/her relationships with other people.  

For example, the reuniting Spitchcocks could be faced with the obstacle that they all live on different continents.  This is, obviously, a huge challenge to their reunion.  But it’s a STRONGER challenge if they live on those different continents because ten years ago, when they were together as a band, the lead singer, Jorge, married the drummer, Carrie, and had an affair with the bassist, Vince.

Lastly, Scott…


5)  AVOID WRITING IN GENERICS LIKE “MOST SPECTACULAR WAY” AND “BIGGEST GIG OF THEIR LIFE.”  Although loglines must use words sparingly, they must also be the right words to communicate your story accurately and with detail.  “Biggest gig of their life” may mean one thing to one reader… and an entirely different thing to another reader.  And what’s most important is that your reader understands what those moments mean to YOU.

Having said that, it doesn’t matter exactly what the Spitchcocks’ “biggest gig” is… or how “spectacularly” the Spitchcocks implode… as long as it’s the biggest “EMOTIONAL” gig of their life and the most “EMOTIONALLY” spectacular implosion they could have.  

For example, you could argue that the “biggest gig of their life” is that they’ve been invited to open for U2 for ONE NIGHT ONLY (the normal opener is out sick), and if it goes well, it could re-launch their career.  This could obviously be “the biggest gig of their life.”  

OR… “the biggest gig of their life” could be this: the lead singer Barry’s daughter is dying, and Barry doesn’t have the money for her surgery… so he reunites the band for a charity concert to raise $500,000 and save his child’s life.  This could also be the “biggest gig of his life.”  And—frankly—it may even be “bigger,” because the stakes are higher.

OR… perhaps The Spitchcocks is a wonky sci-fi comedy, and the band has been kidnapped by an alien race that tells them: “You have 24 hours to put together a concert of entirely new material… or we’ll destroy the planet Earth.”  Silly, I know—but with the right tone it could work… and THAT is certainly the “biggest gig of their life.”

What this basically boils down to, Scott, is your story’s STAKES (what your characters stand to lose if they fail in their quests)… and deciding/understanding what they are.  Once you know that, those are the specifics to plug into the vague holes left by “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life.”


Anyway, Scott, I hope this is helpful!  Feel free to play, shape, mold, rework, tweak, polish… and resubmit.  

In the mean time, if other readers have loglines or summaries for the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to post them here, or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.

In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great posts coming up.  We’ll have more Pitch Workshop submissions… we’ll talk about how to protect your work… we'll help the American Idol writers earn fair pay, residuals, and health benefits… we'll have book reviews… and much, much more!


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
10/14/2008 11:25:56 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Wednesday, September 17, 2008
WEBSITE OF THE DAY: Amanda the Aspiring TV Writer
Posted by Chad

Props to my friend Charlie for turning me on to this site, but I wanted to let you all know about a pretty great blog... from Amanda the Aspiring TV Writer

I don't know Amanda personally, but if you're interested in television writing... or how to break in... this is a terrific site.  Here's the scoop... Amanda is a young woman, here in L.A., trying to make it as a television writer.  So she's doing what many people do when they're trying to get their foot in the door: working at an agency, which is one of the best-- if not THE best-- way to get your start in Hollywood (especially in TV).

So Amanda uses her blog not only to give writing advice, but also to advise people on how to get their start, how to navigate the world of agencies, etc.  She even posts interesting events and writer-centric activities around town.  But perhaps most interestingly, Amanda captures what it's like to be twentysomething and trying to make it in television.  She writes about everything from the culture within an agency... to why she loves TV... to how to network and find jobs.  It's half memoir, half advice-column, half behind-the-curtain-glimpse at Hollywood.  (And yes-- that's three halves.  I am HORRIBLE at math.)

Anyway, check it out... it's a different (and, I think, fresher and perhaps more honest) look at writing-- or trying to write-- in Hollywood then you get at blogs of more established writers.


Books Tools Resources | Fun Stuff | Writing Advice | Writing TV
9/17/2008 8:58:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
 Sunday, September 14, 2008
Palin vs. Clinton: The SNL Match-Up
Posted by Chad

For those of you haven't seen last night's Saturday Night Live sketch starring Tina Fey as Sarah Palin and Amy Poehler as Hillary Clinton, I'm posting it here.  I love this not only because Tina Fey does a DEAD-ON Palin impersonation, but because this is some great political sketch producing.

I love it not only because of Fey's performance and the biting wit, but because the SNL writers do a terrific job of creating a little "relationship" between these women on screen.  (For those of you who haven't been to one of my L.A. classes, I'm a HUGE proponent of pounding home that all good storytelling-- regardless of length or purpose-- is about only three things: RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS.) 

It would've been easy for the writers to simply string together some snarky political one-liners and rely on the strenth of their performers' impersonations (Amy Poehler does a decent job, but not as good as Tina Fey), but instead they took the time to let the fictional Palin/Clinton relationship build. 

Both characters in this sketch have strong personal/emotional wants... which they articulate at the beginning of the sketch... but in order to achieve their wants they're forced to team up with the one person most antithetical to their objective.  (Well, Hillary is, anyway-- Palin is practically oblivious to the tension in the relationship.)  You can almost hear the SNL writers asking themselves "how would these two women feel-- and behave-- if forced to join together for a brief moment on the political stage?"  "How would their world-views conflict, and how would these conflicting views affect their behavior?"

Take a look... lemme know what you think...



Fun Stuff | Writing Advice | Writing TV
9/14/2008 7:39:05 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3]
 Sunday, August 31, 2008
READER QUESTION: TV Spec-Writing Advice?
Posted by Chad

Today’s question comes from Peggy, an aspiring TV writer who lives in Florida.  Peggy writes…

“I love Law & Order: SVU, and I am working on a script.  Any suggestions for me?”

Well, first of all, Peggy—congratulations on starting your spec!  I’m not sure exactly what stage you’re at, but I think simply starting a new script is farther than most aspiring writers ever get; the world is full of “writers” who never actually write… they simply talk about ideas and hang out in Starbucks.  So kudos on putting pen to paper and actually starting a project!

You’re also taking the exact right first step in launching a TV career.  One of the essential elements of any aspirant’s portfolio is at least a couple “spec scripts,” or sample episodes of shows already on the air.  Spec scripts can’t be sold or produced; they’re simply written as samples of your work, calling cards to show off your talent.  So when TV shows like “Law & Order: SVU” or “Pushing Daisies” hire their staffs of writers, their showrunners and executive producers vet potential writers by reading their sample specs.

It’s also important to understand that producers rarely read specs of their own shows; most, in fact, NEVER read specs of their own show.  This is for a couple reasons:

1)  Legal reasons.  Showrunners never want to find themselves in a position where they could be accused of stealing a writer’s script or story idea, so they try not to expose themselves to spec scripts of their own series.  This may seem over-protective, but the truth is: writers throw about hundreds, maybe thousands, or story areas each year… so it’s quite probable that many of the specs out there are treading on story territories that the writers have actually explored or talked about.

2)  Writers on staff live and breathe their shows’ characters and stories, so they know the worlds of their series better than anyone… making it nearly impossible for them to be impressed with an outside writer’s take.  This isn’t to say they’re arrogant or close-minded; it just means they’ve played with a gazillion story and character possibilities over the course of writing the series… so not only is it rare for an outside writer to come up with something original (and tonally accurate), but when an outside spec-writer does write something the staff has already discussed, it makes it easy for a showrunner to dismiss the spec (even if it’s fairly well-written).  In other words, the bar is set so incredibly high when a showrunner reads a spec of his/her own show, it’s not fair to the showrunner OR the writer.  So rather than putting themselves… or you… in that position, most showrunners just don’t read specs of their own series.

Thus, your “Law & Order: SVU” script probably won’t help get you a job at “Law & Order: SVU;” but it could certainly land you a job at “CSI” or “Numb3rs.”

So, moving forward, here are my top three suggestions for writing your spec:

•  OUTLINE EPISODES.  Watch as many episodes of “Law & Order: SVU” as you possibly can.  Or, better yet, read the scripts.  (Words often read a bit differently than the play on-screen.)  Write down what happens in every scene, and note when it takes place in the story (the time-code or page number).  This will give you the beginnings of a reverse-engineered outline.  Keep it short and sweet, like this…

2:42 – Detectives discover murdered body.
3:36 – Learn victim is bowling champion.
4:12 – Victim’s diary says he was having an affair with his wife’s sister.
6:00 – Interview wife’s sister; she denies affair.

Then go back through each “beat,” or piece of story information, and identify how it functions, or helps push the story forward.  For instance (this time, I’ll do it with page numbers, as if we’re following the actual script, rather than a produced episode from TV)…

Page 2 – Detectives discover murdered body – DISCOVER MYSTERY
Page 3 – Learn victim is bowling champion – IDENTIFY VICTIM
Page 5 – Victim’s diary says he was having an affair with his wife’s sister – IDENTIFY SUSPICIOUS RELATIONSHIP AND SUSPECT #1
Page 7 – Interview wife’s sister; she denies affair – SUSPECT #1 DENIES RELATIONSHIP, COMPLICATES INVESTIGATION

Do this for the entire script, then go back through and remove the details associated with the particular episode you’re using as a model.  I.e., using the info above…

Page 2 – Discover mystery
Page 3 – Identify victim
Page 5 – Identify suspicious relationship and suspect #1
Page 7 – Suspect #1 denies relationship with victim, complicates investigation

As you can see, you slowly develop a “reverse outline,” or an exact structural breakdown of a produced episode of “Law & Order!”  You can then follow this beat-for-beat, simply laying your own story over the skeleton of the old.  You may need to tweak and fudge some beats here and there, but because you’re “borrowing” from a working episode, you should have a solid outline with which to structure your spec!


•  SLASH ANY LINE THAT’S NOT ABSOLUTELY 100% NECESSARY.  This is one of my favorite rewriting techniques.  After writing your first draft, read through your script with a red pen.  Slash ANY LINE OR WORD that is not COMPLETELY NECESSARY TO PUSHING THE STORY FORWARD.  I don’t care if it’s beautiful description; if it doesn’t propel the story, cut it.  I don’t care if it’s hilarious repartee; axe it.  I don’t care if it’s a brilliant character moment; trash it.  Deep-six anything—and I mean literally ANYTHING—that is not pure story.  And expect to lose at least a third of what you’ve written.  (First drafts are almost always too long.)

You’ll be left with a pared-down script that is nothing but bare-bones narrative.  Which means your script will not only read “leaner,” but it’ll also show you where you have holes that need to be fixed.  Some places, you’ll realize, need more dialogue to illustrate what’s happening between two characters.  Others need whole new scenes.

This can be a painful process; after pouring your heart and soul into a script, it’s tough to go through and rip it to shreds.  But often when we DON’T shave stories down to bare essentials, it’s difficult to tell whether or not they’re working because they’re cluttered with fun dialogue, description, and character moments.  And while these can be emotionally moving, they cloud the story itself.  So it’s important, after your first draft, to reduce your script to nothing but plot.


•  SORT DIALOGUE BY CHARACTER.  As you’re watching or reading your “Law & Order: SVU” episodes, write down each character’s EVERY LINE OF DIALOGUE.  Yes, that’s right… EVERY ONE.  Then sort them according to character: Stabler’s lines, Benson’s lines, Munch’s lines, etc.  Once you’re able to isolate and focus on each character’s lines, you’ll notice quirks and consistencies.  Does one character always talk in sassy retorts?  Does another communicate only in monosyllabic grunts?  Is another always being overly negative or positive?

Do the same with your script as you finish each draft; separate your own dialogue by character.  Does each person speak in a consistent voice that’s appropriate to his/her character?  Do certain lines need to be punched up?  Do some characters sound too similar to one another?


Well, Peggy—there ya go… my top three spec-writing suggestions.  I’d also recommend picking up Pamela Douglas’s excellent book, Writing the TV Drama Series.  This book deals a bit more with creating your own series, but it’s still got some outstanding writing advice, especially for drama writers like yourself.  Also, if you spend just a couple moments on Amazon, or at your local bookstore or library, you can certainly find countless other great books on writing TV specs and dramas.

I hope all this is helpful, Peggy.  Please lemme know how it goes… and I hope to see you on a staff out here soon!

For the rest of you who may have questions about writing for TV, film, or the Internet… or questions about the business, how to break in, etc… please don’t hesitate to post a comment below or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.

Have a great Labor Day, everyone!

Chad


Writing Advice | Writing TV
8/31/2008 12:13:23 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
 Saturday, August 23, 2008
GUEST PERSPECTIVE: How NOT to Write a Screenplay
Posted by Chad

Hey, screenwriters--

I'm excited to present a special guest today... William M. Akers, author of the new screenwriting book, Your Screenplay Sucks! 100 Ways To Make It Great, from Michael Wiese Productions, and... my former screenwriting teacher at Vanderbilt University!

Will was not only a great teacher (and my first screenwriting professor ever), but he's written movies and television for virtually every major network and studio from MGM and Disney to FOX, NBC, and ABC.  He's currently writing a movie for Overture Films which is being directed by Jon Amiel.  This is his first book... and he's done an incredible job. 

Your Screenplay Sucks! is a terrific first outing, not only because it's packed with great info, tips, and insight, but because it has a wonderfully unique approach to working on your script.  First of all, it's a great book to read if you've never written a screenplay and want some terrific first-time-out pointers and help.  But more importantly and uniquely... this is a great book to read if you've already learned-- or are in the process of learning-- how to do it, and want to make sure your script is as good as it can possibly be.

Basically, Your Screenplay Sucks! is a comprehensive checklist of the 100 things screenwriters almost NEVER do... but should.  It pinpoints specific mistakes writers make-- such as "you don't have a killer first page" or "you haven't buried exposition like Jimmy Hoffa" or "you call shots"-- which makes it easy to focus in on specific aspects of your script and punch them up.  And because it's in checklist form, you can just go down the list, looking at and improving each aspect until you've whipped your screenplay into shape.

Also, this book doesn't use kid gloves.  It doesn't coddle you and give you warm-your-heart artistic advice like "listen to your heart" or "find the hidden writer within."  This book is designed to pummel mistakes out of your script until it's better.  It has sections like "you didn't run your spellcheck, you moron!" and "you blew your first ten pages! Arggggghhhhh!" and "you think your script is special and rules don't apply."  Many of the mistakes are mistakes screenwriters at all levels continue to make.  As such, it doesn't pull punches... it ribs you, goads you, and takes your script to task until its better (which, even in and of itself, is a great lesson in writing with "voice"). 

So do yourself a favor... head to your nearest bookstore, or click HERE to go to Amazon, and grab yourself a copy of Your Screenplay Sucks!  But first... check out the interview I did this week with Will... you'll learn a bit more about him, the book, and writing in general...


Will... you have a unique career, because you write and teach… and you do both far from the madding crowds of Hollywood.  So let’s begin by learning your path.  Tell me how you started writing professionally… and how you got to where you are today.

When I was in the third grade, my teacher would read to us after lunch.  My favorite book was The Wolves of Willoughby Chase, an English adventure with wolves, sleighs in the snow, and little girls and a wicked governess who kills their parents for their money.  After I got out of USC grad school, I knew I wanted to write, so I looked at things that had been eating at me for a long time, (which make the best subjects for screenplays, btw) and I had never forgotten the book that had been read to me as a child.  I ended up optioning it.  Nine months later, I had a screenplay.  It was produced by Zenith Productions in London.  It found a home on the Disney Channel and I was nominated for a CableAce.  Actually, that wasn’t my first professional gig.  Haven’t thought of this in a while.  When I was still at USC, I was sitting outside the chairman’s office telling stories to his assistant and he came out of his office, pointed at me and said, “Are you a writer?”  I said, “Sure.”  He said, “Come in my office.”  He didn’t know my name.  Someone had called, a manager for child actors, and wanted USC’s best writing student to write a screenplay for one of his clients.  The chairman told him he had just the writer in mind, opened his door, and saw me.  I got paid $1,500 dollars.  Needless to say, the movie never got made.  I love the idea that this manager thought the chairman went through some involved search to get to me, their “best writing student” and he didn’t even know my name.  Easiest way I ever got a job. 

After the first job, I had to get the next one.  I’ve always had an agent in Los Angeles, and if you live out of town, it helps.  But, you can’t sit around waiting for your agent to land you a job.  You have to go out and beat the bushes.  I’ve sold pitches, sold spec scripts, and been hired on assignment.  Every year is different.  Some years, I haven’t worked at all.  It helps to have no credit card debt and as small a house note as possible!  Even when I’m not getting paid to write, I’m still writing spec material.  I tend to write every day, so after a while, that’s a lot of pages.  It’s been a hodgepodge of trying to get work, and failing, and wasting time, and being lucky, and writing and writing and writing.  Sometimes it works and most times it doesn’t.  The key is that you have to enjoy it even when it’s not working.

Right now, I’m rewriting a spec I sold.  Done eleven drafts for the producers in nearly two years.  The script is about the fall of Saigon.  Jon Amiel is directing it, and, under his aegis, the script has only gotten better.  “Development paradise” is not a phrase you often hear, but it applies to this one.  I just sold a pitch about a cop in London, based on a true story, and am waiting for the contracts to be negotiated before I start work.  So there is a bit of activity here and there...


You’ve written and sold numerous screenplays, and now you’ve published a book about screenwriting.  One of the things that makes this book unique is its approach and tone.  It’s not a how-to book for beginners trying their first screenplay; it’s an in-your-face pummeling for people who have written a few scripts and want to whip them into shape.  It doesn’t pull punches or wear kiddie gloves; it’s a brutally honest assessment of the 100 biggest mistakes you see in beginners’ screenplays.  So what compelled you, when you already have a successful screenwriting career, to write this book?  And how did you decide on its unique voice and checklist format?

First of all, Your Screenplay Sucks! is aimed at both beginning and more experienced writers.  There’s a lot in there about generating an idea and how to develop characters and especially what I call “physical writing” -- how to write a clean sentence that actually tells the reader what you think it means... That’s useful to a writer just starting her first script, and you don’t often see it covered in books.  As for experienced writers, I’ve heard from people who’ve been selling material for twenty years who said the book reminded them of stuff they had forgotten they were supposed to be doing.  Anybody who is contemplating starting a script, or rewriting one, can benefit.  So much for the commercial plug. 

As to where it came from, I wrote it in self defense.  I’ve been critiquing screenplays for a long time, and I found that beginning writers all make the same mistakes.  Over and over and over and over.  So, I thought to create a checklist so the writer could do all this boilerplate stuff I had to tell every client about, and then send me their script so I could hammer them on structure and character instead of “don’t have character names that rhyme,” “take out thes and thats,” “make your prose crystal clear,” and “beware of research...”  The book’s voice is my voice.  I dictated the first draft of the book, so it’s a breezy read and, for a screenwriting book, pretty funny.


How did the process of writing a book differ from the process of writing a screenplay?  What surprised you about the differences in writing a book?

I wrote a table of contents and a few chapters, sent it to the publisher, and they said “Go for it.” Once I knew it was going to be published, it was a complete blast to write.  Like writing a movie, I suppose, where you know the producer has a put deal.  Not that that’s ever happened to me... I basically wrote it for myself and had fun.  I put in there whatever the hell I thought would be helpful, and that’s what came out the other end.  No development hell.  I rewrote it a lot, but what’s there is what I wanted.  A lot easier than writing a screenplay, that’s for sure.  What surprised me is how much fun I had writing it.


Now that you’ve finished the book and returned to screenwriting, how has going through the book-writing process helped your screenwriting chops and process?  Or has it?


Interesting question.  Act III of the book is about selling your screenplay and dealing with producers and Hollywood, and I have found myself trying to take my own advice.  Weird, huh?  All the painstaking work I did on the rewriting section of the book has helped my first drafts.  There is so much in the book about being clear and concise, that writing it rubbed off on my own work.  


You’ve done what few people are able to do… maintain a successful screenwriting career while living far from the heart of Los Angeles.  How do you do this?  What advice do you have for screenwriters and aspirants who don’t live—or can’t get to—Los Angeles?

Horrible question.  Do you actually want the truth?  It’s a bitch-willy to write and not live in L.A..  I lived there three years as a grad student in film school.  Then three more years getting my career going.  I’m still dining off those six years of living in Los Angeles full time.  For six more years after that, I kept an apartment in West Hollywood and commuted regularly until my sharp-fanged, drooling landlord figured out a way to throw me out.  So, I did put in my time in L.A.  Living someplace else, lobbing scripts at Los Angeles, hoping someone will notice is, if you want my opinion, a fool’s paradise.  You don’t want to confuse hope with denial.  You can win a contest and get discovered, but that’s not easy.  Every agent I’ve ever had came because a friend held a gun to their head, handed them a script and said, “Read this.  This guy walks on water.”  I never had a single query letter answered.  Not one. 

Okay, so much for the depressing part... Now for the advice.  Figure out a way to get to Los Angeles, regularly. Find people who live there who you can meet.  Facebook.  Network.  Lie.  Use the internet.  Use the Creative Directory.  Talk to 18 year old kids about how to do it.  Take a marketing person to lunch and squeeze them dry for free.  Get out there somehow.  Or, get your material out there. 

Of course, the single best (and essential) thing you can do is to write a great screenplay.  Not a good one, either, mind you.  There’re lots of them all over.  In gutters.  Being used to clean windshields at gas stations.  L.A. is lousy with good scripts.  Any jackass can write a good screenplay.  But, keep in mind, they’re not interested in good scripts, only great ones.  So write a great one.  If it takes you three years, so be it.  If your script is great, people will pass your material on to someone they know because it makes them look good.  Great material will open doors. 

Remember, that if you ever do meet someone “real” who is in a position to pass your script on to someone else, your script has to be bulletproof.  You will only get one read.  If it’s not fantastic, they will never read anything from you again.  You have to make it perfect.  Hence the crying need for writers to buy my book or hire me to crit their script before it’s too late! 


You teach college students, so you’re often working with young writers just starting to experiment with screenwriting and storytelling.  What are the top three mistakes you see beginning writers make?

They don’t have a breathtakingly original, wildly creative, non-derivative idea.  They put the backstory in the first act.  They don’t take the time to pare down the scene description and dialogue to the bare stark-white bones.  They have character names that rhyme or start with the same letter.  Their bad guy is poorly constructed.  They don’t separate out the characters’s voices.  They didn’t throw out the first twenty pages.  They don’t have a clue how the motion picture or television business operates.  They are arrogant and think the rules don’t apply.  They argue when you give them notes.  They don’t keep the reader in mind when they are writing.  Those’re probably the top three mistakes.


Your Screenplay Sucks! details 100 mistakes you see aspiring screenwriters make in their projects.  But what are the biggest mistakes you’ve made… both in your actual writing and your career… and what have you learned from them?

Biggest mistake I ever made was when a producer wanted to make a script of mine and I told him... “No.”  The script was autobiographical and I wanted to direct it myself.  Idiot.  The instant I said I was attached to direct, the script died and that was that.  The producer had the financing and everything in place to make the movie and I, moron that I was, didn’t let him make my movie.  I still own the script.  It sits on a shelf, sneering at me.

In my writing, there is not a writing mistake I have not made.  Repeatedly.  I’ve done everything wrong there is to do, but not in the draft I handed in.  I tried to correct the mistakes before I showed the material to anybody in the business.

Another gigantic mistake I’ve made is to allow my heart to rule my head when it comes to choosing material.  The longer I take to decide what to write, the better off I am.  Just because I think it’s a great idea and is something that will easily sell, doesn’t mean it will sell.  I have an eclectic personality, and that is doom when it comes to choosing material.  No one is a master of all genres, and you need to pick the one or two you’re good at and stick with them.  I’ve never written the same thing twice, and that’s a hindrance.  Better to find a groove and stay in it.


Screenwriting is a collaborative art form; screenwriters must know how to work and get along with directors, producers, designers, actors, etc.  Having given screenwriters the 100 mistakes made when writing a script… what are the top three mistakes screenwriters often make during the rest of the production process, when dealing with all the other people and parts of making a movie?

It’s tricky to deal with a producer and their notes.  You want to do the notes that will help the script while tactfully forgetting the ones that are destructive.  Bear in mind that no one, at least I tell myself this, no one is trying to destroy your screenplay, but sometimes people who don’t have a great story sense will give you a note that sounds like a good idea to them, but, if executed, will eventually cause the entire house of cards that is the story, to collapse. 

You have to listen, to everybody, and figure out how to deal with what they say they want.  Sometimes it’s not what they really mean, because they don’t know what they really mean.  That makes it tougher.

Being arrogant is death.  You are not in charge and your goal is to get your story told... not rigorously protect the material from people you may see as Visigoths.  Producers loathe writers who guard every word like it’s sacrosanct.  Don’t fight for every phrase like it’s Omaha Beach.  They’re just trying to help you make your movie.  A movie in a theater that you wrote, that got changed some, is far more valuable and interesting to your career than a screenplay that is 100% unaltered... but that never got made...!  They are paying you to execute the notes, so don’t be a brat.

I just had dinner with a guy who had investors for a project and $20 million to fund it.  They flew in a private jet to meet the writers and tell them the changes they wanted done so they could pull the trigger.  The writers refused to change anything.  The investors got on their plane and flew away.  And the writers still... control... their material!  Whaddya bet their wives aren’t too happy with them?

A simple thing about notes is to write it all down, when you’re in the meeting.  Don’t trust memory.  Write it down, then decide later what you’re going to do and not do.  If you take killer notes, at least you’ll come out of the meeting knowing precisely what was discussed.  I take my laptop to every meeting, so I walk away knowing what was said.  Then I have a checklist to go through.


You have a unique career, because half your career is dedicated to teaching young writers to write.  And as you say in the dedication of your book, you’ve learned a ton from your students.  So… what have you learned from your students?  What has teaching taught you that makes you a better writer?

By correcting their mistakes, I am reminded not to make those mistakes in my writing.  Their enthusiasm for what they are doing is always contagious, so their fire for the work constantly fuels my own.  I’ve written screenplays with my students, too, and that’s a great way to learn.  Plus, it’s fun to hang out with people younger than I am.  They have different world views and opinions and listen to better music.



Books Tools Resources | Career Advice | Guest Perspectives | Screenwriting (Film) | Writing Advice
8/23/2008 12:46:19 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Sunday, August 17, 2008
READER QUESTION: Why shouldn't I write an "origin pilot?"
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys—

First off, I want to give a HUGE THANK YOU to E. Daniels and everyone else who submitted questions to Eric, our host at Reality Binge, for him to answer on his funny blog.  You can submit whenever you want, so please… keep ‘em coming!

Secondly, wanted to take a few moments to answer a great question I received the other day.
This question comes from Susan, who took my pilot writing class last week.  Susan writes...

“You recommend not writing an ‘origin pilot’ (a la Lost), but writing a pilot that could be episode 100 or episode 1.   But aren't pilots where the main character moves to Alaska (Northern Exposure) or gets hit on the head (Samantha Who?) origin pilots?  Or do you mean a literal creation of a whole new world type of thing?”

Great question, Susan!  To get to that answer, let’s take a quick step back to catch people up…

As I said last week last week, many writers often make the mistake of thinking that a pilot is simply the first episode of a TV series, and your job in writing a pilot is to write the beginnings of a story and characters that make people want to keep watching.

While this is PART of what a pilot is, it’s only partially/somewhat/occasionally accurate.

In truth, a pilot is designed to be a prototype of a typical episode or your series.  Yes, it’s introducing your audience to the world of your story (and before your show is on the air, your pilot’s “audience” consists mainly of network execs who decide whether to air your project at all), but it’s also meant to show networks how the show will work in series.  Which means your job is not only to launch a story that can sustain itself for years to come, but to illustrate how that series will generate and tell stories whether it’s at episode 10 or episode 500.

Thus, if every episode of your show is a close-ended story in which your main character, a detective, solves an art heist, your pilot needs to show that detective solving an art heist.  If every episode of your series shows a group of friends helping each other through wacky dating situations, your pilot needs to show that same group of friends helping each other through funny dating situations.

In other words, while your pilot is—in some way—unlike any other episode of your series (because it’s the beginning of your story), it must also work just