<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Script Notes by Chad Gervich - Screenwriting (Film)</title>
    <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>F+W Media, Inc.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:10:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>brian.klems@fwpubs.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>brian.klems@fwpubs.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Hey, everyone--<br /><br />
If you haven't heard, I wanted to let you all know some very sad news... one of film's
most amazing teachers and writers, <b>Blake Snyder</b>, passed away yesterday. 
He died in his home of cardiac arrest.  Blake is best known as the author of
the incredible <i><b>Save the Cat</b></i> books, which helped thousands upon thousands
of screenwriters do their best work.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.blakesnyder.com/2009/08/blake-snyder-1952-2009/#comments">Here's
a link to his website</a>, where fans are posting words of sorrow and condolences...<br /><br />
And <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-15568-SF-Film-Industry-Examiner%7Ey2009m8d4-BLAKE-SNYDER-19522009">another
link to <b>Dennis Willis</b>'s remembrance in last night's <i><b>San Francisco Examiner</b></i></a>...<br /><br />
Blake will be greatly missed, and the art and craft of screenwriting has lost a true
leader, mentor, and champion...<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e" /></body>
      <title>SAD NEWS:  Blake Snyder Passes On</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SAD+NEWS+Blake+Snyder+Passes+On.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Hey, everyone--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you haven't heard, I wanted to let you all know some very sad news... one of film's
most amazing teachers and writers, &lt;b&gt;Blake Snyder&lt;/b&gt;, passed away yesterday.&amp;nbsp;
He died in his home of cardiac arrest.&amp;nbsp; Blake is best known as the author of
the incredible &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Save the Cat&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; books, which helped thousands upon thousands
of screenwriters do their best work.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.blakesnyder.com/2009/08/blake-snyder-1952-2009/#comments"&gt;Here's
a link to his website&lt;/a&gt;, where fans are posting words of sorrow and condolences...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And &lt;a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-15568-SF-Film-Industry-Examiner%7Ey2009m8d4-BLAKE-SNYDER-19522009"&gt;another
link to &lt;b&gt;Dennis Willis&lt;/b&gt;'s remembrance in last night's &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;San Francisco Examiner&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Blake will be greatly missed, and the art and craft of screenwriting has lost a true
leader, mentor, and champion...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,b92227dd-814b-48c2-8b2c-4e242b47f76e.aspx</comments>
      <category>Industry Updates</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The best part of “<a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/"><b>The
Ugly Truth</b></a>,” which opens this Friday, July 24, is that its title pretty much
writes the review for you.<br /><br />
A romantic comedy so bland and paint-by-numbers that it’s astounding it even got made
(and more astounding that <b>Katherine Heigl</b> and <b>Gerard Butler </b>chose it),
it begins by following <b>Abby</b>, an idealistic, micro-managing TV news producer
in <b>Sacramento</b>.  When her news show begins failing, her station manager
hires <b>Mike</b>, the obnoxious-yet-charming, chauvinistic-yet-honest host of “The
Ugly Truth,” a relationship and dating advice show on the local cable-access channel.<br /><br />
Abby and Mike could not be more diametrically opposed; Abby, a “strong independent
woman,” approaches dating by having a literal checklist of things she needs in a man…
and if he doesn’t meet all ten, the date’s over.  Mike is hedonistic; he loves
chicks in bikinis, jello-wrestling, one night stands, you name it.  Although
these two characters despise each other, they’re forced to work together because Abby’s
news show needs the higher ratings Mike’s schtick is earning.<br /><br />
But when Abby develops a crush on <b>Colin</b> (<b>Eric Winter</b>), her cute and
perfect next-door neighbor, she needs Mike’s blunt and insightful advice to snag him. 
Thus, Mike becomes a kind of <b>Cyrano</b> to Abby’s Christian, guiding her through
a series of dating set pieces: coaching her on her first date via a hidden ear-bud…
helping her through a business dinner when her vibrating panties accidentally begin
giving her a series of massive orgasms… etc.<br /><br />
Over the course of helping Abby woo Colin, Mike falls in love with her himself. 
I won’t bother telling you the ending, not because there’s anything remotely unpredictable
in it, but because you already know where it’s going.<br /><br />
Now, there’s plenty of stuff wrong with “<a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/">The
Ugly Truth</a>,” but to me, there’s one weakness that outshines them all.  One
weakness that, I believe, is the key to ANY good romantic comedy.  And if done
well, any other flaw in the movie can be forgiven.  And that weakness is…<br /><br /><i><b>YOU NEVER LONG FOR THESE TWO PEOPLE TO BE TOGETHER.</b></i><br /><br />
And if the audience isn’t DYING for the two main characters of a romantic comedy to
be together—think “<b>When Harry Met Sally</b>” or “<b>Annie Hall</b>”—almost nothing
else in the story matters.<br /><br />
Having said that, it’d be easy to blame this problem on the actors’ lack of chemistry,
but I think the problems start not with the performers, but in the script.<br /><br />
There are 2 reasons why the script itself never makes us want Abby and Mike to get
together…<br /><br />
1)    We don’t see how they need each other.  Or, rather, we see
how Abby needs Mike—he teaches her how to loosen up, be sexy and flirty, and enjoy
life—but we never see why Mike needs Abby.  Sure, Katherine Heigl is pretty…
but by the end of the movie, even Mike’s chauvinistic character has learned that love
isn’t about looks… yet we don’t see him learn what the hell it IS about!  Abby
doesn’t teach him to do anything… she barely improves his show… she does NOTHING for
him.<br /><br />
All the great romantic comedy couples work like a yin and yang; they complement each
other’s strength’s and weaknesses.  <b>Annie</b> grounds <b>Alvy</b> and helps
him grow up; Alvy helps Annie break out of her shell, become more confident and able
to live a life.<br /><br />
But that doesn’t happen in “<a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/">The Ugly
Truth</a>.”  It’s a one-sided relationship; and when we can’t see what one of
the characters gets from the other, emotionally, it makes it very tough for us to
root for them being together.<br /><br />
2)    The story, especially in its supposedly comic set pieces, doesn’t
explore the Abby-Mike relationship, so we never feel like their relationship is being
progressed.  Or rather, since the main plot points—and main comedy points—aren’t
illuminating or exploring Abby and Mike, we never get the fun of seeing them spar,
butt heads, reach new levels of understanding and connection, etc.<br /><br />
The first set piece involves Abby on a date with Colin at a baseball game.  Mike,
a few rows away, is feeding her lines through a hidden headset in her ear.  Aside
from the fact that nothing Mike says is particularly unique or helpful, the whole
scene feels overly-familiar, trite, and painfully uninspired.  Like when a girl
accidentally spills on Mike’s jeans and Mike says, “What the fuck,” so Abby repeats
“What the fuck,” and Colin wonders who she’s talking to.  So Mike says, “I wasn’t
talking to you,” and Abby says, “I wasn’t talking to you,” and Colin wonders who she’s
talking to.  (I mean, come on, screenwriters <b>Nicole Eastman, Karen McCullah
&amp; Kirsten Smith</b>—you guys can do better than this.)<br /><br />
The second set piece involves Abby accidentally wearing a pair of vibrating panties
to a business dinner where she’s taken Colin, her date.  And when the panties’
remote control falls out of her purse and is picked up by a curious kid at the next
table, orgasms ensue.  Firstly, the whole scenes a poor, sad man’s version of <b>Meg
Ryan</b>’s orgasm scene from “When Harry Met Sally,” especially when another female
diner watches Abby’s orgasm and says, “What in the ceviche?”  <br /><br />
But more importantly—the scene does NOTHING to further the Abby-Mike relationship. 
The scene worked in “When Harry Met Sally” because the two of them were alone at a
table, discussing women’s ability to fool men… and Sally’s performance not only proved
her point, but it put Harry on the spot.  So it illuminated their different belief
systems—AND showed how far Sally would go simply to prove Harry wrong.<br /><br />
Yet the similar scene in “The Ugly Truth” lacks all the subtle character/relationship
understanding of “Harry &amp; Sally” and is nothing more than a soulless scene about
a women having an orgasm in public.<br /><br /><br />
So the lessons to take away from this, romantic comedy screenwriters: 
<br /><br />
1)    Make sure your romantic comedy characters each need—and receive—something
from each other.  Actors’ chemistry is not enough; each character must, on the
page—and this is gonna be a poor choice of words, but I’m gonna use it anyway—fill
very specific holes in the other.  (EMOTIONAL HOLES!  Get your head out
of the gutter.)<br /><br />
2)    Make sure your major scenes and set pieces are somehow exploring
and deepening the relationship between your two leads.  This doesn’t mean they
have to be visibly and obviously falling in love or showing affection—they can certainly
be conflicting… and fall in love later—but it does mean we should be seeing new aspects
of their relationship.<br /><br />
In fact, “<a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/">The Ugly Truth</a>” ends with
an exchange of dialogue that beautifully illustrates all it’s greatest weaknesses…<br /><br />
ABBY:  You’re in love with me?  Why?<br />
MIKE:  Beats the hell out of me.<br /><br />
Exactly.<br /><br /><font size="4"><b><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ke2BNQaj34"><i>The Ugly Truth</i> trailer</a></b></font><br /><br /><object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6ke2BNQaj34&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6ke2BNQaj34&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="340" width="560"></embed></object><br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b" /></body>
      <title>MOVIE TALK: The Ugly Truth</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/MOVIE+TALK+The+Ugly+Truth.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The best part of “&lt;a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Ugly Truth&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,”
which opens this Friday, July 24, is that its title pretty much writes the review
for you.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A romantic comedy so bland and paint-by-numbers that it’s astounding it even got made
(and more astounding that &lt;b&gt;Katherine Heigl&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Gerard Butler &lt;/b&gt;chose it),
it begins by following &lt;b&gt;Abby&lt;/b&gt;, an idealistic, micro-managing TV news producer
in &lt;b&gt;Sacramento&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp; When her news show begins failing, her station manager
hires &lt;b&gt;Mike&lt;/b&gt;, the obnoxious-yet-charming, chauvinistic-yet-honest host of “The
Ugly Truth,” a relationship and dating advice show on the local cable-access channel.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Abby and Mike could not be more diametrically opposed; Abby, a “strong independent
woman,” approaches dating by having a literal checklist of things she needs in a man…
and if he doesn’t meet all ten, the date’s over.&amp;nbsp; Mike is hedonistic; he loves
chicks in bikinis, jello-wrestling, one night stands, you name it.&amp;nbsp; Although
these two characters despise each other, they’re forced to work together because Abby’s
news show needs the higher ratings Mike’s schtick is earning.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But when Abby develops a crush on &lt;b&gt;Colin&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;b&gt;Eric Winter&lt;/b&gt;), her cute and
perfect next-door neighbor, she needs Mike’s blunt and insightful advice to snag him.&amp;nbsp;
Thus, Mike becomes a kind of &lt;b&gt;Cyrano&lt;/b&gt; to Abby’s Christian, guiding her through
a series of dating set pieces: coaching her on her first date via a hidden ear-bud…
helping her through a business dinner when her vibrating panties accidentally begin
giving her a series of massive orgasms… etc.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Over the course of helping Abby woo Colin, Mike falls in love with her himself.&amp;nbsp;
I won’t bother telling you the ending, not because there’s anything remotely unpredictable
in it, but because you already know where it’s going.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, there’s plenty of stuff wrong with “&lt;a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/"&gt;The
Ugly Truth&lt;/a&gt;,” but to me, there’s one weakness that outshines them all.&amp;nbsp; One
weakness that, I believe, is the key to ANY good romantic comedy.&amp;nbsp; And if done
well, any other flaw in the movie can be forgiven.&amp;nbsp; And that weakness is…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;YOU NEVER LONG FOR THESE TWO PEOPLE TO BE TOGETHER.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And if the audience isn’t DYING for the two main characters of a romantic comedy to
be together—think “&lt;b&gt;When Harry Met Sally&lt;/b&gt;” or “&lt;b&gt;Annie Hall&lt;/b&gt;”—almost nothing
else in the story matters.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having said that, it’d be easy to blame this problem on the actors’ lack of chemistry,
but I think the problems start not with the performers, but in the script.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are 2 reasons why the script itself never makes us want Abby and Mike to get
together…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We don’t see how they need each other.&amp;nbsp; Or, rather, we see
how Abby needs Mike—he teaches her how to loosen up, be sexy and flirty, and enjoy
life—but we never see why Mike needs Abby.&amp;nbsp; Sure, Katherine Heigl is pretty…
but by the end of the movie, even Mike’s chauvinistic character has learned that love
isn’t about looks… yet we don’t see him learn what the hell it IS about!&amp;nbsp; Abby
doesn’t teach him to do anything… she barely improves his show… she does NOTHING for
him.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
All the great romantic comedy couples work like a yin and yang; they complement each
other’s strength’s and weaknesses.&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Annie&lt;/b&gt; grounds &lt;b&gt;Alvy&lt;/b&gt; and helps
him grow up; Alvy helps Annie break out of her shell, become more confident and able
to live a life.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But that doesn’t happen in “&lt;a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/"&gt;The Ugly
Truth&lt;/a&gt;.”&amp;nbsp; It’s a one-sided relationship; and when we can’t see what one of
the characters gets from the other, emotionally, it makes it very tough for us to
root for them being together.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The story, especially in its supposedly comic set pieces, doesn’t
explore the Abby-Mike relationship, so we never feel like their relationship is being
progressed.&amp;nbsp; Or rather, since the main plot points—and main comedy points—aren’t
illuminating or exploring Abby and Mike, we never get the fun of seeing them spar,
butt heads, reach new levels of understanding and connection, etc.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The first set piece involves Abby on a date with Colin at a baseball game.&amp;nbsp; Mike,
a few rows away, is feeding her lines through a hidden headset in her ear.&amp;nbsp; Aside
from the fact that nothing Mike says is particularly unique or helpful, the whole
scene feels overly-familiar, trite, and painfully uninspired.&amp;nbsp; Like when a girl
accidentally spills on Mike’s jeans and Mike says, “What the fuck,” so Abby repeats
“What the fuck,” and Colin wonders who she’s talking to.&amp;nbsp; So Mike says, “I wasn’t
talking to you,” and Abby says, “I wasn’t talking to you,” and Colin wonders who she’s
talking to.&amp;nbsp; (I mean, come on, screenwriters &lt;b&gt;Nicole Eastman, Karen McCullah
&amp;amp; Kirsten Smith&lt;/b&gt;—you guys can do better than this.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second set piece involves Abby accidentally wearing a pair of vibrating panties
to a business dinner where she’s taken Colin, her date.&amp;nbsp; And when the panties’
remote control falls out of her purse and is picked up by a curious kid at the next
table, orgasms ensue.&amp;nbsp; Firstly, the whole scenes a poor, sad man’s version of &lt;b&gt;Meg
Ryan&lt;/b&gt;’s orgasm scene from “When Harry Met Sally,” especially when another female
diner watches Abby’s orgasm and says, “What in the ceviche?” &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But more importantly—the scene does NOTHING to further the Abby-Mike relationship.&amp;nbsp;
The scene worked in “When Harry Met Sally” because the two of them were alone at a
table, discussing women’s ability to fool men… and Sally’s performance not only proved
her point, but it put Harry on the spot.&amp;nbsp; So it illuminated their different belief
systems—AND showed how far Sally would go simply to prove Harry wrong.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yet the similar scene in “The Ugly Truth” lacks all the subtle character/relationship
understanding of “Harry &amp;amp; Sally” and is nothing more than a soulless scene about
a women having an orgasm in public.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So the lessons to take away from this, romantic comedy screenwriters: 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Make sure your romantic comedy characters each need—and receive—something
from each other.&amp;nbsp; Actors’ chemistry is not enough; each character must, on the
page—and this is gonna be a poor choice of words, but I’m gonna use it anyway—fill
very specific holes in the other.&amp;nbsp; (EMOTIONAL HOLES!&amp;nbsp; Get your head out
of the gutter.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Make sure your major scenes and set pieces are somehow exploring
and deepening the relationship between your two leads.&amp;nbsp; This doesn’t mean they
have to be visibly and obviously falling in love or showing affection—they can certainly
be conflicting… and fall in love later—but it does mean we should be seeing new aspects
of their relationship.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In fact, “&lt;a href="http://www.thetruthisntpretty.com/"&gt;The Ugly Truth&lt;/a&gt;” ends with
an exchange of dialogue that beautifully illustrates all it’s greatest weaknesses…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
ABBY:&amp;nbsp; You’re in love with me?&amp;nbsp; Why?&lt;br&gt;
MIKE:&amp;nbsp; Beats the hell out of me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Exactly.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ke2BNQaj34"&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Ugly Truth&lt;/i&gt; trailer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;object height="340" width="560"&gt;
&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6ke2BNQaj34&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;"&gt;
&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;
&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6ke2BNQaj34&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="340" width="560"&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,cd3ae267-78db-499d-a243-0a18a6370d5b.aspx</comments>
      <category>Movie Talk</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I’ve never worked in independent film. 
I like independent film. I have friends who work in independent film.  I’ve written
screenplays that could be independent films.  But me, personally—I don’t think
I could do it.  For one main reason…<br /><br />
One of the main duties of an independent filmmaker is to round up money, the financing,
and the thought of doing that—quite honestly—terrifies me.  Not only because
I’m terrible with math and numbers, but the idea of <i><b>asking someone for money</b><b></b></i> seems
horribly awkward, confrontational, desperate, uncomfortable.  Who do you ask? 
How do you ask them?  What if they say no? If they say no, does it mean your
idea sucks?  What if they say yes?  What if they say no and never talk to
you again?  What if they say yes and never get a return?  What if they laugh
at you?<br /><br />
These questions are so daunting to me I’ve never been able to fathom actually doing
it… and I have near-total awe and respect for those that do.<br /><br />
But now comes a new book—<i><b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932907572?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932907572">Bankroll:
A New Approach to Financing Feature Films</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932907572" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></b></i>,
by <a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/"><b>Tom Malloy</b></a>—that explains how to
gather financing for your independent film from the perspective of a guy who’s done
it.  And most importantly, a guy who is—and I mean this in the BEST way possible—a
COMPLETE NOBODY.<br /><br /><i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932907572?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932907572">Bankroll</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932907572" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></i> walks
newbies through the process of raising money for indie films with budgets of $300,000
- $8 million.  <a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/">Malloy</a> talks about where
to find HNI’s (High Net-Worth Individuals)... how to put together a business plan…
and how to approach and pitch them.  He also spends a lot of time coloring the
lessons with stories and experiences from his own career.  Normally, I’m not
a big fan of books that claim to teach you the ropes and instead just spout their
own stories, but Malloy strikes a nice balance; he tells a lot of stories, but he
then uses each story to illustrate a lesson.  And perhaps most importantly…<br /><br />
YOU’VE PROBABLY NEVER HEARD OF <a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/">TOM MALLOY</a> OR
ANY OF HIS MOVIES.  (Anyone seen—or heard of—<i><b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000XJD30W?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B000XJD30W">The
Attic</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000XJD30W" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></b></i>?<i><b>  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0004Z3044?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B0004Z3044">Gravesend</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0004Z3044" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></b></i>?<i><b>  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001HVZO7A?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B001HVZO7A">The
Alphabet Killer</a></b></i>?)<br /><br />
This, to me, is the book’s biggest selling point.  We’ve all read books or articles
about how <i><b>Slumdog Millionaire</b></i> got made, or <i><b>Reservoir Dogs</b></i>,
or other “indie classics.”  And while we’d all like to write the next <i><b>Terminator</b></i><b><i></i></b> or <b><i>sex,
lies, and videotape</i></b>, the truth is… most of us won't.  Most indie films
come from small, but still talented, filmmakers just trying to raise enough money
to make their movies and get them into contests, festivals, etc.  If the movie
goes on to become <b><i>Star Wars</i></b> or <i><b>The Usual Suspects</b></i>, great—but
it’s nearly impossible to control or predict this.  So while learning how <b>George
Lucas </b>or <b>Robert Rodriguez</b> or <b>Quentin Tarantino</b> worked their magic
is indeed inspirational, I usually find it unhelpful.  Those men are anomalies,
and it’s tough to learn to be an anomaly; this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t aim as high
as possible, it just means it’s much easier to start learning at the ground floor.<br /><br />
(And just to be clear—I’m not saying you shouldn’t shoot to be the best you can be. 
I’m just saying that it’s tough to say, “I want to be the biggest, most legendary
film producer of all time.”  It’s much easier, and more realistic, to say, “I
want to spend my life and career making good movies I love and care about.” 
If they go on to become the next <i><b>The Matrix</b></i>, great—but you can’t really
engineer that to happen.)<br /><br />
This, to me, is <i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932907572?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932907572">Bankroll</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932907572" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></i>’s
biggest selling point.  When <a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/">Malloy</a> is
telling stories about raising money for one of his films… or walking you through his
sample business plan (which is great, by the way—like having a step-by-step template
right in front of you)… or even just talking about how he psychs himself up for a
pitch or investor meeting… you’re aware that the info is coming from a guy who, very
recently, was in YOUR EXACT SHOES.  Unlike George Lucas, who is light years ahead
of the rest of us, career and money-wise, Tom Malloy is only one, two or three steps
ahead of the rest of us… and he’s giving us the path to get where he is.<br /><br />
So if you’re struggling to figure out how raise money for your latest script… or you’re
thinking of dabbling in the low-budget indie film world… take a look—it’s a great
primer.  And while I don’t think I’m quite ready to dive into the indie film
world myself, I’m definitely a lot less scared.<br /><br /><br /><p></p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=scrinote-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=1932907572&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;m=amazon&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=000000&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" style="width: 120px; height: 240px;" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12" /></body>
      <title>BOOK REVIEW: Bankroll</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/BOOK+REVIEW+Bankroll.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>I’ve never worked in independent film.&amp;nbsp; I like independent film. I have friends who work in independent film.&amp;nbsp; I’ve written screenplays that could be independent films.&amp;nbsp; But me, personally—I don’t think I could do it.&amp;nbsp; For one main reason…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of the main duties of an independent filmmaker is to round up money, the financing,
and the thought of doing that—quite honestly—terrifies me.&amp;nbsp; Not only because
I’m terrible with math and numbers, but the idea of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;asking someone for money&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; seems
horribly awkward, confrontational, desperate, uncomfortable.&amp;nbsp; Who do you ask?&amp;nbsp;
How do you ask them?&amp;nbsp; What if they say no? If they say no, does it mean your
idea sucks?&amp;nbsp; What if they say yes?&amp;nbsp; What if they say no and never talk to
you again?&amp;nbsp; What if they say yes and never get a return?&amp;nbsp; What if they laugh
at you?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
These questions are so daunting to me I’ve never been able to fathom actually doing
it… and I have near-total awe and respect for those that do.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But now comes a new book—&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932907572?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1932907572"&gt;Bankroll:
A New Approach to Financing Feature Films&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=1932907572" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;,
by &lt;a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tom Malloy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;—that explains how to
gather financing for your independent film from the perspective of a guy who’s done
it.&amp;nbsp; And most importantly, a guy who is—and I mean this in the BEST way possible—a
COMPLETE NOBODY.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932907572?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1932907572"&gt;Bankroll&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=1932907572" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/i&gt; walks
newbies through the process of raising money for indie films with budgets of $300,000
- $8 million.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/"&gt;Malloy&lt;/a&gt; talks about where
to find HNI’s (High Net-Worth Individuals)... how to put together a business plan…
and how to approach and pitch them.&amp;nbsp; He also spends a lot of time coloring the
lessons with stories and experiences from his own career.&amp;nbsp; Normally, I’m not
a big fan of books that claim to teach you the ropes and instead just spout their
own stories, but Malloy strikes a nice balance; he tells a lot of stories, but he
then uses each story to illustrate a lesson.&amp;nbsp; And perhaps most importantly…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
YOU’VE PROBABLY NEVER HEARD OF &lt;a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/"&gt;TOM MALLOY&lt;/a&gt; OR
ANY OF HIS MOVIES.&amp;nbsp; (Anyone seen—or heard of—&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000XJD30W?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B000XJD30W"&gt;The
Attic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=B000XJD30W" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0004Z3044?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B0004Z3044"&gt;Gravesend&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=B0004Z3044" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001HVZO7A?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B001HVZO7A"&gt;The
Alphabet Killer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;?)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This, to me, is the book’s biggest selling point.&amp;nbsp; We’ve all read books or articles
about how &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Slumdog Millionaire&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; got made, or &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reservoir Dogs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;,
or other “indie classics.”&amp;nbsp; And while we’d all like to write the next &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Terminator&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; or &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;sex,
lies, and videotape&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, the truth is… most of us won't.&amp;nbsp; Most indie films
come from small, but still talented, filmmakers just trying to raise enough money
to make their movies and get them into contests, festivals, etc.&amp;nbsp; If the movie
goes on to become &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Star Wars&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; or &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Usual Suspects&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, great—but
it’s nearly impossible to control or predict this.&amp;nbsp; So while learning how &lt;b&gt;George
Lucas &lt;/b&gt;or &lt;b&gt;Robert Rodriguez&lt;/b&gt; or &lt;b&gt;Quentin Tarantino&lt;/b&gt; worked their magic
is indeed inspirational, I usually find it unhelpful.&amp;nbsp; Those men are anomalies,
and it’s tough to learn to be an anomaly; this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t aim as high
as possible, it just means it’s much easier to start learning at the ground floor.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(And just to be clear—I’m not saying you shouldn’t shoot to be the best you can be.&amp;nbsp;
I’m just saying that it’s tough to say, “I want to be the biggest, most legendary
film producer of all time.”&amp;nbsp; It’s much easier, and more realistic, to say, “I
want to spend my life and career making good movies I love and care about.”&amp;nbsp;
If they go on to become the next &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Matrix&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, great—but you can’t really
engineer that to happen.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This, to me, is &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932907572?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1932907572"&gt;Bankroll&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=1932907572" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/i&gt;’s
biggest selling point.&amp;nbsp; When &lt;a href="http://www.tommalloy.com/"&gt;Malloy&lt;/a&gt; is
telling stories about raising money for one of his films… or walking you through his
sample business plan (which is great, by the way—like having a step-by-step template
right in front of you)… or even just talking about how he psychs himself up for a
pitch or investor meeting… you’re aware that the info is coming from a guy who, very
recently, was in YOUR EXACT SHOES.&amp;nbsp; Unlike George Lucas, who is light years ahead
of the rest of us, career and money-wise, Tom Malloy is only one, two or three steps
ahead of the rest of us… and he’s giving us the path to get where he is.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So if you’re struggling to figure out how raise money for your latest script… or you’re
thinking of dabbling in the low-budget indie film world… take a look—it’s a great
primer.&amp;nbsp; And while I don’t think I’m quite ready to dive into the indie film
world myself, I’m definitely a lot less scared.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;p=8&amp;amp;l=as1&amp;amp;asins=1932907572&amp;amp;fc1=000000&amp;amp;IS2=1&amp;amp;lt1=_blank&amp;amp;m=amazon&amp;amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;amp;bc1=000000&amp;amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;amp;f=ifr" style="width: 120px; height: 240px;" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"&gt;
&lt;/iframe&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,8ad38e92-fa81-4d74-8e00-be4a757a0e12.aspx</comments>
      <category>Books Tools Resources</category>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">At last weekend's <b>Producers Guild/Produced
By</b> conference, a <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/"><i><b>Deadline
Hollywood Daily</b></i></a> stringer compiled <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/indie-filmmaking-35-tips-from-experts/">a
list of 35 tips</a> on producing <b>indie films</b>, from the mouths of folks like <b>RJ
Cutler, Roger Corman, Lawrence Bender,</b> and a host of great execs, producers, and
agents.<br /><br />
Click <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/indie-filmmaking-35-tips-from-experts/"><b>HERE</b></a> to
check it out!<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7" /></body>
      <title>35 Tips on Indie Filmmaking... According to Nikki Finke &amp; Friends</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/35+Tips+On+Indie+Filmmaking+According+To+Nikki+Finke+Friends.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>At last weekend's &lt;b&gt;Producers Guild/Produced By&lt;/b&gt; conference, a &lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Deadline
Hollywood Daily&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; stringer compiled &lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/indie-filmmaking-35-tips-from-experts/"&gt;a
list of 35 tips&lt;/a&gt; on producing &lt;b&gt;indie films&lt;/b&gt;, from the mouths of folks like &lt;b&gt;RJ
Cutler, Roger Corman, Lawrence Bender,&lt;/b&gt; and a host of great execs, producers, and
agents.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Click &lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/indie-filmmaking-35-tips-from-experts/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;HERE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to
check it out!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,0dbf9ecc-097f-478b-a061-7a60f6d57bf7.aspx</comments>
      <category>Books Tools Resources</category>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Conferences and Festivals</category>
      <category>Production</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Hey, guys--<br /><br />
Thanks to <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/"><b>Brian</b></a>, who pointed
out <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/the-real-story-of-how-the-hangover-got-made-ps-its-based-on-someone-in-hollywood/">this
great article</a> on <b>Nikki Finke</b>'s <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/the-real-story-of-how-the-hangover-got-made-ps-its-based-on-someone-in-hollywood/"><b>Deadline
Hollywood Daily</b></a> about how <i><b>The Hangover</b></i> came to be written...
it's a pretty fun story-- <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/the-real-story-of-how-the-hangover-got-made-ps-its-based-on-someone-in-hollywood/">check
it out</a>!<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01" /></body>
      <title>Hung Up on the Hangover!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Hung+Up+On+The+Hangover.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:04:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Hey, guys--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks to &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brian&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, who pointed
out &lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/the-real-story-of-how-the-hangover-got-made-ps-its-based-on-someone-in-hollywood/"&gt;this
great article&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;b&gt;Nikki Finke&lt;/b&gt;'s &lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/the-real-story-of-how-the-hangover-got-made-ps-its-based-on-someone-in-hollywood/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Deadline
Hollywood Daily&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; about how &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Hangover&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; came to be written...
it's a pretty fun story-- &lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/the-real-story-of-how-the-hangover-got-made-ps-its-based-on-someone-in-hollywood/"&gt;check
it out&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,daeaf515-7bfc-48fc-a35f-f4d894fc1f01.aspx</comments>
      <category>Fun Stuff</category>
      <category>Industry Updates</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Hey, folks--<br /><br />
Hot off the press, here's a letter from WGA president <b>Patric Verone</b>... thought
you might find it interesting...<br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/header-wgaw-president.gif" border="0" /><br />
May 29, 2009              
<br /><br />
To My Fellow Members,<br /><br />
It’s been a while since I’ve reported to you about the progress of <b>Writers Guild</b> organizing
efforts and the many successes we’ve had in the past two years.  Organizing writers
who work without a WGA contract is one of the key ways we strengthen the Guild and
protect the standards we have all struggled so long and hard to achieve.<br />
 <br />
Our first priority in organizing is always to defend our core jurisdiction: network
and cable dramas, sitcoms (including network primetime animated sitcoms), longform
television, talk shows, variety shows, game shows, and live-action features. 
Beginning with our current contract, our jurisdiction now also includes original and
derivative content in New Media.  Our second priority is the expansion of our
jurisdiction to areas where we currently lack coverage or where non-signatory companies
have been operating, including reality television, non-primetime and feature animation,
and non-fiction.<br />
 <br />
With those priorities in mind, here is a recap of our recent efforts:<br />
 <br /><b>CABLE TELEVISION</b><br />
 <br />
In cable we have focused on <b>Comedy Central</b> because it employs a large number
of writers. Working closely with writers on Comedy Central’s main shows, we undertook
a strategy of escalating actions, culminating in a short work stoppage. One show at
a time, we organized WGA coverage for:<br />
 <br /><i><b>The Sarah Silverman Program<br />
Mind of Mencia<br />
The Showbiz Show with David Spade<br />
American Body Shop<br />
Root of All Evil<br />
Chocolate News<br />
Reno 911!<br />
Michael &amp; Michael Have Issues<br />
Secret Girlfriends<br />
The Comedy Central Roast of Larry the Cable Guy<br />
The Comedy Central Roast of Bob Saget<br />
The Untitled Jeff Dunham Project<br />
Tosh.0<br />
Eddie Portnoy, Boy Producer<br />
Ghosts/Aliens</b></i><br />
 <br />
We continue to build on a positive relationship with the network and recently signed
an overall deal covering all future Comedy Central roasts.  We hope to achieve
a more comprehensive overall deal and are currently engaged in efforts to cover all
dramatic and comedy-variety shows produced by Comedy Central.<br /><br />
Elsewhere in cable we have organized and made deals for dramatic programs, quiz and
audience participation shows, non-dramatic, and documentary shows.  In all these
cases, the role of the writers in providing information and assistance, and their
willingness to refuse work if necessary were keys to success.  Thanks to their
efforts we now cover:<br />
 <br /><b>Tyler Perry</b>’s <i><b>House of Payne</b></i> for <b>TBS</b><br />
Tyler Perry’s <i><b>Meet the Browns</b></i> for TBS<br /><i><b>The Cheech and Chong Roast</b></i> for TBS<br /><i><b>Match Game</b></i> for TBS<br /><i><b>The Singing Bee</b></i> for <b>CMT</b><br /><i><b>Secrets of the Founding Fathers</b></i> for the <b>History Channel</b><br /><i><b>Spontaneous Human Combustion</b></i> for the <b>Discovery Channel</b><br /><b>The Tunguska Event</b> for the Discovery Channel<br /><i><b>Animal Armageddon</b></i> for <b>Animal Planet</b><br /><b><br />
NETWORK TELEVISION</b><br />
 <br /><i><b>Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader? </b></i><br />
 <br />
Last year we signed a WGA deal for this primetime hit game show.  Recently we
also negotiated a deal to cover the syndicated version of the show.<br />
 <br /><i><b>Sit Down, Shut Up</b></i><br />
 <br />
We assisted the writers of this <b>Sony</b> primetime animated series in a work stoppage
aimed at getting WGA coverage.  To resolve the dispute, the company offered each
of the writers six-figure “blind pilot” deals covered by the WGA and standard WGA
terms for their work on the series, although the series (now canceled) nominally remained
under an <b>IATSE</b> contract.<br />
 <i><b><br />
The Osbournes: Loud and Dangerous</b></i><br />
 <br />
Despite overwhelming coverage of the network primetime writing work force, writers
have still had to struggle for WGA contracts on occasion.  One of the essential
ways members can protect Guild benefits is by refusing to work for non-signatory companies.
Working Rule 8 states: “No member shall accept employment with, nor option or sell
literary material to, any person, firm or corporation who is not signatory to the
applicable MBAs.” This rule is designed to ensure that the only way entertainment
companies can have access to Guild talent is through a Guild deal.<br />
 <br />
We invoked Working Rule 8 on the Osbournes program after the production company, <b>FremantleMedia</b>,
refused to negotiate a fair deal.  Guild members heeded the call and refused
to write for this non-guild show, which would have been the first non-WGA comedy-variety
show in primetime broadcast TV.  To date, only one episode has aired, to extremely
poor reviews and bad ratings.  The remaining episodes may well never be aired. 
We believe that the failure of this show is a direct result of the company not being
able to use Guild writers<br />
 <br /><b>NEW MEDIA</b><br />
 <br />
The Guild organized and made deals with 26 companies that have become signatory to
the WGA MBA for the express purpose of producing New Media content.  Web programming
produced by these companies includes:<br />
 <br /><i><b>Seth MacFarlane’s Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy<br />
Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog<br />
Woke Up Dead<br />
In the Motherhood<br />
1,000 Days<br />
Wainy Days<br />
Back on Topps<br />
Web Therapy</b></i><br />
 <br />
We have also signed contracts for Internet content from New Media production companies <b>Machinima.com</b> and <b>Science
+ Fiction</b>.<br />
 <br /><b>VIDEOGAMES</b><br />
 <br />
We have signed 44 interactive agreements to provide WGA members with pension and health
benefits for their work on videogames. Our most recent deals are for <i><b>Battle
CMT</b></i> and <i><b>Project 9</b></i>.<br />
 <b><br />
FEATURE FILMS</b><br />
 <br />
In the past 18 months we made deals to cover several high-profile feature films, including <i><b>Into
the Wild</b></i> and <i><b>Frozen River</b></i>.  Since the beginning of last
year, we have made deals to cover 15 low-budget films:<br />
 <br /><i><b>Assisting Venus<br />
The Blue Tooth Virgin<br />
Bob’s New Suit<br />
Children of Invention<br />
Exporting Raymond<br />
Father vs. Son<br />
Herpes Boy<br />
The Red Queen<br />
The Scenesters<br />
Strictly Sexual<br />
The Two Bobs<br />
The Undying<br />
Women in Trouble</b></i><br /><br /><b>FOREIGN PRODUCED PROJECTS</b><br />
 <br />
In the area of foreign-produced projects employing WGA members, we have secured WGA
deals for <i><b>Noah’s Ark</b></i> (an animated feature), <i><b>The 99 </b></i>and <i><b>Bommi
&amp; Friends</b></i> (animated TV series), and <i><b>Poirot</b></i> (a live-action
series).<br />
 <b><br />
REALITY TELEVISION</b><br />
 <br />
In reality television, we have pressured the networks and production companies through
strikes at <i><b>America’s Next Top Model</b></i> and the FremantleMedia game show <i><b>Temptation</b></i>. 
In both cases writers walked off their jobs to protest the companies’ refusal to negotiate
WGA coverage. 
<br />
 <br />
We pressured the entire reality industry through public exposure of the serious labor
law violations by reality television production companies.  We conducted a focused
exposure of the most important production company, FremantleMedia, the producers of <i><b>American
Idol</b></i>, with the “<b>American Idol Truth Tour.</b>”<br />
 <br />
As awareness of the abuses against workers in reality TV grows so does the number
of workers willing to take action.  Last month a group of FremantleMedia workers
independently filed a multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuit against the company
for its violations of California’s wage and hour laws. Two lawsuits brought by writers
against <b>Next Entertainment</b> and <b>Rocket Science Entertainment</b> are in the
process of settling for $4.5 million dollars.<br />
 <b><br />
ORGANIZING THE FUTURE</b><br />
 <br />
Defending and expanding our jurisdiction do not take place in a vacuum. The gains
won as a result of our 100-day strike have helped change the environment in which
we undertake our organizing efforts, and as this report reflects, we are making steady
progress getting companies to agree to WGA coverage of their projects.<br />
 <br /><b>The Organizing and Jurisdiction Department</b> has primary staff responsibility
for external organizing, but every department of the Guild has participated in and
deserves credit for our organizing successes. None of it, however, would have been
possible without the support and sacrifices of you, our members.  I would like
to personally thank all the brave, committed, and hard working writers who helped
with these efforts. Because of you we are all stronger and better off.<br />
 <br />
The organizing struggle is far from over and there is much important work left to
be done.  I know the Guild can count on your support and assistance in this crucial
effort.<br />
 <br />
Best,<br />
 <br /><b>Patric M. Verrone</b><br />
President, <b>WGAW</b><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/footer-blue.gif" border="0" /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8" /></body>
      <title>A Letter from WGA President Patric Verone...</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/A+Letter+From+WGA+President+Patric+Verone.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Hey, folks--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Hot off the press, here's a letter from WGA president &lt;b&gt;Patric Verone&lt;/b&gt;... thought
you might find it interesting...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/header-wgaw-president.gif" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
May 29, 2009&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To My Fellow Members,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It’s been a while since I’ve reported to you about the progress of &lt;b&gt;Writers Guild&lt;/b&gt; organizing
efforts and the many successes we’ve had in the past two years.&amp;nbsp; Organizing writers
who work without a WGA contract is one of the key ways we strengthen the Guild and
protect the standards we have all struggled so long and hard to achieve.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Our first priority in organizing is always to defend our core jurisdiction: network
and cable dramas, sitcoms (including network primetime animated sitcoms), longform
television, talk shows, variety shows, game shows, and live-action features.&amp;nbsp;
Beginning with our current contract, our jurisdiction now also includes original and
derivative content in New Media.&amp;nbsp; Our second priority is the expansion of our
jurisdiction to areas where we currently lack coverage or where non-signatory companies
have been operating, including reality television, non-primetime and feature animation,
and non-fiction.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
With those priorities in mind, here is a recap of our recent efforts:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;CABLE TELEVISION&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
In cable we have focused on &lt;b&gt;Comedy Central&lt;/b&gt; because it employs a large number
of writers. Working closely with writers on Comedy Central’s main shows, we undertook
a strategy of escalating actions, culminating in a short work stoppage. One show at
a time, we organized WGA coverage for:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Sarah Silverman Program&lt;br&gt;
Mind of Mencia&lt;br&gt;
The Showbiz Show with David Spade&lt;br&gt;
American Body Shop&lt;br&gt;
Root of All Evil&lt;br&gt;
Chocolate News&lt;br&gt;
Reno 911!&lt;br&gt;
Michael &amp;amp; Michael Have Issues&lt;br&gt;
Secret Girlfriends&lt;br&gt;
The Comedy Central Roast of Larry the Cable Guy&lt;br&gt;
The Comedy Central Roast of Bob Saget&lt;br&gt;
The Untitled Jeff Dunham Project&lt;br&gt;
Tosh.0&lt;br&gt;
Eddie Portnoy, Boy Producer&lt;br&gt;
Ghosts/Aliens&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
We continue to build on a positive relationship with the network and recently signed
an overall deal covering all future Comedy Central roasts.&amp;nbsp; We hope to achieve
a more comprehensive overall deal and are currently engaged in efforts to cover all
dramatic and comedy-variety shows produced by Comedy Central.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Elsewhere in cable we have organized and made deals for dramatic programs, quiz and
audience participation shows, non-dramatic, and documentary shows.&amp;nbsp; In all these
cases, the role of the writers in providing information and assistance, and their
willingness to refuse work if necessary were keys to success.&amp;nbsp; Thanks to their
efforts we now cover:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Tyler Perry&lt;/b&gt;’s &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;House of Payne&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for &lt;b&gt;TBS&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Tyler Perry’s &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Meet the Browns&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for TBS&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Cheech and Chong Roast&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for TBS&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Match Game&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for TBS&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Singing Bee&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for &lt;b&gt;CMT&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Secrets of the Founding Fathers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for the &lt;b&gt;History Channel&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Spontaneous Human Combustion&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for the &lt;b&gt;Discovery Channel&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;The Tunguska Event&lt;/b&gt; for the Discovery Channel&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Animal Armageddon&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for &lt;b&gt;Animal Planet&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
NETWORK TELEVISION&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader? &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Last year we signed a WGA deal for this primetime hit game show.&amp;nbsp; Recently we
also negotiated a deal to cover the syndicated version of the show.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sit Down, Shut Up&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
We assisted the writers of this &lt;b&gt;Sony&lt;/b&gt; primetime animated series in a work stoppage
aimed at getting WGA coverage.&amp;nbsp; To resolve the dispute, the company offered each
of the writers six-figure “blind pilot” deals covered by the WGA and standard WGA
terms for their work on the series, although the series (now canceled) nominally remained
under an &lt;b&gt;IATSE&lt;/b&gt; contract.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Osbournes: Loud and Dangerous&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Despite overwhelming coverage of the network primetime writing work force, writers
have still had to struggle for WGA contracts on occasion.&amp;nbsp; One of the essential
ways members can protect Guild benefits is by refusing to work for non-signatory companies.
Working Rule 8 states: “No member shall accept employment with, nor option or sell
literary material to, any person, firm or corporation who is not signatory to the
applicable MBAs.” This rule is designed to ensure that the only way entertainment
companies can have access to Guild talent is through a Guild deal.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
We invoked Working Rule 8 on the Osbournes program after the production company, &lt;b&gt;FremantleMedia&lt;/b&gt;,
refused to negotiate a fair deal.&amp;nbsp; Guild members heeded the call and refused
to write for this non-guild show, which would have been the first non-WGA comedy-variety
show in primetime broadcast TV.&amp;nbsp; To date, only one episode has aired, to extremely
poor reviews and bad ratings.&amp;nbsp; The remaining episodes may well never be aired.&amp;nbsp;
We believe that the failure of this show is a direct result of the company not being
able to use Guild writers&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;NEW MEDIA&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
The Guild organized and made deals with 26 companies that have become signatory to
the WGA MBA for the express purpose of producing New Media content.&amp;nbsp; Web programming
produced by these companies includes:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Seth MacFarlane’s Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy&lt;br&gt;
Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog&lt;br&gt;
Woke Up Dead&lt;br&gt;
In the Motherhood&lt;br&gt;
1,000 Days&lt;br&gt;
Wainy Days&lt;br&gt;
Back on Topps&lt;br&gt;
Web Therapy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
We have also signed contracts for Internet content from New Media production companies &lt;b&gt;Machinima.com&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Science
+ Fiction&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;VIDEOGAMES&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
We have signed 44 interactive agreements to provide WGA members with pension and health
benefits for their work on videogames. Our most recent deals are for &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Battle
CMT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Project 9&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
FEATURE FILMS&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
In the past 18 months we made deals to cover several high-profile feature films, including &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Into
the Wild&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Frozen River&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Since the beginning of last
year, we have made deals to cover 15 low-budget films:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Assisting Venus&lt;br&gt;
The Blue Tooth Virgin&lt;br&gt;
Bob’s New Suit&lt;br&gt;
Children of Invention&lt;br&gt;
Exporting Raymond&lt;br&gt;
Father vs. Son&lt;br&gt;
Herpes Boy&lt;br&gt;
The Red Queen&lt;br&gt;
The Scenesters&lt;br&gt;
Strictly Sexual&lt;br&gt;
The Two Bobs&lt;br&gt;
The Undying&lt;br&gt;
Women in Trouble&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;FOREIGN PRODUCED PROJECTS&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
In the area of foreign-produced projects employing WGA members, we have secured WGA
deals for &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Noah’s Ark&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (an animated feature), &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The 99 &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bommi
&amp;amp; Friends&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (animated TV series), and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poirot&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (a live-action
series).&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
REALITY TELEVISION&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
In reality television, we have pressured the networks and production companies through
strikes at &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;America’s Next Top Model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and the FremantleMedia game show &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Temptation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
In both cases writers walked off their jobs to protest the companies’ refusal to negotiate
WGA coverage. 
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
We pressured the entire reality industry through public exposure of the serious labor
law violations by reality television production companies.&amp;nbsp; We conducted a focused
exposure of the most important production company, FremantleMedia, the producers of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;American
Idol&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, with the “&lt;b&gt;American Idol Truth Tour.&lt;/b&gt;”&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
As awareness of the abuses against workers in reality TV grows so does the number
of workers willing to take action.&amp;nbsp; Last month a group of FremantleMedia workers
independently filed a multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuit against the company
for its violations of California’s wage and hour laws. Two lawsuits brought by writers
against &lt;b&gt;Next Entertainment&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Rocket Science Entertainment&lt;/b&gt; are in the
process of settling for $4.5 million dollars.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
ORGANIZING THE FUTURE&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Defending and expanding our jurisdiction do not take place in a vacuum. The gains
won as a result of our 100-day strike have helped change the environment in which
we undertake our organizing efforts, and as this report reflects, we are making steady
progress getting companies to agree to WGA coverage of their projects.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;The Organizing and Jurisdiction Department&lt;/b&gt; has primary staff responsibility
for external organizing, but every department of the Guild has participated in and
deserves credit for our organizing successes. None of it, however, would have been
possible without the support and sacrifices of you, our members.&amp;nbsp; I would like
to personally thank all the brave, committed, and hard working writers who helped
with these efforts. Because of you we are all stronger and better off.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
The organizing struggle is far from over and there is much important work left to
be done.&amp;nbsp; I know the Guild can count on your support and assistance in this crucial
effort.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Best,&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Patric M. Verrone&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
President, &lt;b&gt;WGAW&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/footer-blue.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,a0c5c686-3583-4e57-adf5-da94d84e08c8.aspx</comments>
      <category>Industry Updates</category>
      <category>Reality TV</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Hey, everyone--<br /><br />
Just wanted to invite you all to next month's annual <a href="http://www.pitchfest.com/"><b>Great
American PitchFest</b></a>, where I'll be speaking and doing pitch and project consultations.<br /><br />
For those of you who haven't been to PitchFest, it's a two-day festival where writers,
producers, directors, and other filmmakers can take classes, network, and pitch their
ideas to actual agents, execs, producers, and representatives from studios, networks,
and production companies.  
<br /><br />
Previous participants have sold scripts, gotten jobs, and signed with representation...
and last year's festival sold out!<br /><br />
Most importantly... I'll be speaking there at <b>10:30 a.m.</b> on <b>Saturday, June
13</b>... participating on "<b>Making It Reel</b>," a panel of reality producers including <b>Tim
Crescenti</b> (<i><b>I Survived a Japanese Game Show</b></i>) and <b>Donna Michelle
Anderson</b> (<i><b>Big Brother, Queer Eye for the Straight Girl</b></i>).<br /><br />
I'll also be doing pitch and project consultations that afternoon, and signing copies
of <i><b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307395316?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0307395316">Small
Screen, Big Picture</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0307395316" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></b></i> at
the <a href="http://www.writersstore.com/"><b>Writers Store</b></a> booth.<br /><br />
Anyway, it should be a valuable, productive, and informative weekend, and I'd love
to see you all there!<br /><br />
For more information, take a look at the attached schedule and check out the website
at <b><a href="http://www.pitchfest.com/">www.pitchfest.com</a></b>, or...<br /><br />
Just fill out the attached sign-up form and send it in to the address or fax number
on the sheet!<br /><br />
Here's all the information...<br /><br />
WHAT:   <a href="http://www.pitchfest.com/"><b>GREAT AMERICAN PITCHFEST</b></a><br /><br />
WHEN:   Saturday, June 13th; 9am-6pm (Free Classes Day &amp; Tradeshow)<br />
             Sunday, June 14th;
10am-6pm (PitchFest Day)<br /><br />
WHERE: <a href="http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/burap-burbank-airport-marriott-hotel-and-convention-center/"><b>Burbank
Marriott Convention Center</b></a><br />
             2500 N. Hollywood
Way, Burbank, CA 91505<br /><br />
OTHER SPEAKERS/PANELISTS INCLUDE: great writers like<b> Shane Black (<i>Lethal Weapon</i>),
Pete Briggs (<i>Hellboy</i>), Joe Forte (<i>Firewall</i>), Simon Kinberg</b> (<i><b>Mr.
&amp; Mrs. Smith</b></i>), <b>Michael Hauge, Blake Snyder</b>, and many more!<br /><br />
And you'll also have the opportunity to pitch to execs, agents, and representatives
from <b>Dimension Films (<i>Bad Santa, Grindhouse, Soul Men</i>), Disney's Gunn Films
(<i>Race to Witch Mountain, Freaky Friday, The Haunted Mansion</i>), Principato Young
(<i>Reno 911</i>), BenderSpink (<i>The Ruins, The Ring</i>), Morgan Creek (<i>Young
Guns, Major League, Georgia Rule, Ace Ventura</i>)</b> and management companies or
agencies like <b>Untitled (Zachary Quinto, Elizabeth Banks)</b> and <b>Abrams Artists</b>.<br /><br />
Here's the sign-up form...<br /><p></p><a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/Pitchfest%20Registration%20Form%20%282009%29.pdf">Pitchfest
Registration Form (2009).pdf (263.59 KB)</a><br /><br />
And here's a schedule of the weekend's events...<br /><br /><a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/PitchFestSchedule2009.pdf">PitchFestSchedule2009.pdf
(57.65 KB)</a><br /><br />
Hope to see you all there!<br /><br />
Chad<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2" /></body>
      <title>Sell Your Movie or TV Show... and Say Hello... at Pitchfest!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Sell+Your+Movie+Or+TV+Show+And+Say+Hello+At+Pitchfest.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Hey, everyone--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just wanted to invite you all to next month's annual &lt;a href="http://www.pitchfest.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Great
American PitchFest&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, where I'll be speaking and doing pitch and project consultations.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those of you who haven't been to PitchFest, it's a two-day festival where writers,
producers, directors, and other filmmakers can take classes, network, and pitch their
ideas to actual agents, execs, producers, and representatives from studios, networks,
and production companies.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Previous participants have sold scripts, gotten jobs, and signed with representation...
and last year's festival sold out!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Most importantly... I'll be speaking there at &lt;b&gt;10:30 a.m.&lt;/b&gt; on &lt;b&gt;Saturday, June
13&lt;/b&gt;... participating on "&lt;b&gt;Making It Reel&lt;/b&gt;," a panel of reality producers including &lt;b&gt;Tim
Crescenti&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I Survived a Japanese Game Show&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) and &lt;b&gt;Donna Michelle
Anderson&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Big Brother, Queer Eye for the Straight Girl&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'll also be doing pitch and project consultations that afternoon, and signing copies
of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0307395316?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0307395316"&gt;Small
Screen, Big Picture&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=0307395316" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; at
the &lt;a href="http://www.writersstore.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Writers Store&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; booth.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, it should be a valuable, productive, and informative weekend, and I'd love
to see you all there!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For more information, take a look at the attached schedule and check out the website
at &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pitchfest.com/"&gt;www.pitchfest.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, or...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just fill out the attached sign-up form and send it in to the address or fax number
on the sheet!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here's all the information...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WHAT:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.pitchfest.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;GREAT AMERICAN PITCHFEST&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WHEN:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Saturday, June 13th; 9am-6pm (Free Classes Day &amp;amp; Tradeshow)&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sunday, June 14th;
10am-6pm (PitchFest Day)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WHERE: &lt;a href="http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/burap-burbank-airport-marriott-hotel-and-convention-center/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Burbank
Marriott Convention Center&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2500 N. Hollywood
Way, Burbank, CA 91505&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OTHER SPEAKERS/PANELISTS INCLUDE: great writers like&lt;b&gt; Shane Black (&lt;i&gt;Lethal Weapon&lt;/i&gt;),
Pete Briggs (&lt;i&gt;Hellboy&lt;/i&gt;), Joe Forte (&lt;i&gt;Firewall&lt;/i&gt;), Simon Kinberg&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mr.
&amp;amp; Mrs. Smith&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;), &lt;b&gt;Michael Hauge, Blake Snyder&lt;/b&gt;, and many more!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And you'll also have the opportunity to pitch to execs, agents, and representatives
from &lt;b&gt;Dimension Films (&lt;i&gt;Bad Santa, Grindhouse, Soul Men&lt;/i&gt;), Disney's Gunn Films
(&lt;i&gt;Race to Witch Mountain, Freaky Friday, The Haunted Mansion&lt;/i&gt;), Principato Young
(&lt;i&gt;Reno 911&lt;/i&gt;), BenderSpink (&lt;i&gt;The Ruins, The Ring&lt;/i&gt;), Morgan Creek (&lt;i&gt;Young
Guns, Major League, Georgia Rule, Ace Ventura&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/b&gt; and management companies or
agencies like &lt;b&gt;Untitled (Zachary Quinto, Elizabeth Banks)&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Abrams Artists&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here's the sign-up form...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/Pitchfest%20Registration%20Form%20%282009%29.pdf"&gt;Pitchfest
Registration Form (2009).pdf (263.59 KB)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And here's a schedule of the weekend's events...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/content/binary/PitchFestSchedule2009.pdf"&gt;PitchFestSchedule2009.pdf
(57.65 KB)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Hope to see you all there!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Chad&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,63e9bc7f-6cb6-4e59-b61c-5ce61230bdd2.aspx</comments>
      <category>Classes Seminars Workshops</category>
      <category>Conferences and Festivals</category>
      <category>Events Activities and Things To Do</category>
      <category>Pitching</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Today's reader question comes from <b>Gina</b>, who writes:<br /><br /><i>"I noticed that screenplays are always rewritten by many different writers but
that would never happen to a playwright or novelist.  Why the double standard? 
But, then again, that is how screenwriter's will make their money on rewriting someone
else's screenplay."</i><br />
 <br />
Well, Gina, screenplays often get rewritten by other people because-- unlike in the
world of theater or publication-- when a screenwriter sells a script to a studio,
he no longer retains ownership of it; the studio does.<br /><br />
In other words, if you sell a novel to<b> Random House</b> tomorrow, you're really
selling them just the publication rights (and probably only for a limited time). 
But you still own your novel, its characters, the movie rights, the merchandising
rights, etc. (probably).<br /><br />
Same thing if you get a play produced at a regional theater, or even on Broadway. 
The play still belongs to you... so you could go sell the film rights or publication
rights elsewhere... the producer is simply entitled to the stage rights.<br /><br />
Not so with movies or television.<br /><br />
In movies or television, the studio actually OWNS the script and almost everything
that comes with it: merchandising rights, stage rights, etc.  This also means
they can change it, re-title it, throw out half the characters, completely change
the subplots, whatever.  They can also then hire ANYONE they want to come in
and rewrite it... including you.  Which means if you sell your screenplay to <b>Warner
Brothers</b> today, you are now-- even though you're the original author-- just a
"work for hire," like every other scrambling screenwriter out there.  (However,
the Writers Guild DOES mandate that when you sell a screenplay, you-- the original
screenwriter-- must get first crack at the rewrite.  But after that first rewrite,
the movie studio can fire you, team you with someone else, keep you aboard... whatever
they want.  It's their script.)<br /><br />
Now, just to complicate things, writers DO sometimes negotiate something called "<b>separated
rights</b>," which means they occasionally get to hold on to things like stage rights,
publication rights, etc.  But how many separated rights you get depends on the
stature and clout of you, the writer, as well as the quality of the agent or manager
doing your deal.<br /><br />
Separated rights can get complicated, but here are links to a couple pages with good
explanations...<br /><br />
•  <a href="http://artfulwriter.com/?p=124"><b>The Artful Writer</b></a> (a terrific
screenwriting blog written by screenwriters <b>Craig Mazin</b> and <b>Ted Elliot</b>,
whose combined credits include <i><b>Shrek, Scary Movie,</b></i> and <i><b>Pirates
of the Caribbean</b></i>) - these guys do a good job of explaining separated rights
simply and succinctly<br /><br />
•  <a href="http://www.wga.org/subpage_writersresources.aspx?id=119"><b>The Writers
Guild of America</b></a> - Also good, but a much more in-depth, technical explanation<br /><br />
And for LOTS more information, check out <i><b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0062732366?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0062732366">The
Writer Got Screwed (but didn't have to)</a></b></i>, by lawyer <b>Brooke A. Wharton</b>. 
The book is about 12 years old, but it still offers tons of great information on the
legalities of screenwriting and <b>Hollywood</b> contracts.<br /><br />
I hope that helps, Gina!  Thank you so much for the question, and please keep
reading!  We've got some great stuff coming up... many more reader questions,
contests, book reviews, you name it!<br /><br />
Talk to you soon...<br /><br />
Chad<br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d" />
      </body>
      <title>GINA'S QUESTION: Why don't playwrights and novelists get rewritten?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/GINAS+QUESTION+Why+Dont+Playwrights+And+Novelists+Get+Rewritten.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Today's reader question comes from &lt;b&gt;Gina&lt;/b&gt;, who writes:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;"I noticed that screenplays are always rewritten by many different writers but
that would never happen to a playwright or novelist.&amp;nbsp; Why the double standard?&amp;nbsp;
But, then again, that is how screenwriter's will make their money on rewriting someone
else's screenplay."&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Well, Gina, screenplays often get rewritten by other people because-- unlike in the
world of theater or publication-- when a screenwriter sells a script to a studio,
he no longer retains ownership of it; the studio does.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In other words, if you sell a novel to&lt;b&gt; Random House&lt;/b&gt; tomorrow, you're really
selling them just the publication rights (and probably only for a limited time).&amp;nbsp;
But you still own your novel, its characters, the movie rights, the merchandising
rights, etc. (probably).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Same thing if you get a play produced at a regional theater, or even on Broadway.&amp;nbsp;
The play still belongs to you... so you could go sell the film rights or publication
rights elsewhere... the producer is simply entitled to the stage rights.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not so with movies or television.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In movies or television, the studio actually OWNS the script and almost everything
that comes with it: merchandising rights, stage rights, etc.&amp;nbsp; This also means
they can change it, re-title it, throw out half the characters, completely change
the subplots, whatever.&amp;nbsp; They can also then hire ANYONE they want to come in
and rewrite it... including you.&amp;nbsp; Which means if you sell your screenplay to &lt;b&gt;Warner
Brothers&lt;/b&gt; today, you are now-- even though you're the original author-- just a
"work for hire," like every other scrambling screenwriter out there.&amp;nbsp; (However,
the Writers Guild DOES mandate that when you sell a screenplay, you-- the original
screenwriter-- must get first crack at the rewrite.&amp;nbsp; But after that first rewrite,
the movie studio can fire you, team you with someone else, keep you aboard... whatever
they want.&amp;nbsp; It's their script.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, just to complicate things, writers DO sometimes negotiate something called "&lt;b&gt;separated
rights&lt;/b&gt;," which means they occasionally get to hold on to things like stage rights,
publication rights, etc.&amp;nbsp; But how many separated rights you get depends on the
stature and clout of you, the writer, as well as the quality of the agent or manager
doing your deal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Separated rights can get complicated, but here are links to a couple pages with good
explanations...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://artfulwriter.com/?p=124"&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Artful Writer&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (a terrific
screenwriting blog written by screenwriters &lt;b&gt;Craig Mazin&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Ted Elliot&lt;/b&gt;,
whose combined credits include &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Shrek, Scary Movie,&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pirates
of the Caribbean&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) - these guys do a good job of explaining separated rights
simply and succinctly&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.wga.org/subpage_writersresources.aspx?id=119"&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Writers
Guild of America&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - Also good, but a much more in-depth, technical explanation&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And for LOTS more information, check out &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0062732366?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0062732366"&gt;The
Writer Got Screwed (but didn't have to)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, by lawyer &lt;b&gt;Brooke A. Wharton&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
The book is about 12 years old, but it still offers tons of great information on the
legalities of screenwriting and &lt;b&gt;Hollywood&lt;/b&gt; contracts.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I hope that helps, Gina!&amp;nbsp; Thank you so much for the question, and please keep
reading!&amp;nbsp; We've got some great stuff coming up... many more reader questions,
contests, book reviews, you name it!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Talk to you soon...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Chad&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,7777fb6d-7299-4113-881b-24e58ead845d.aspx</comments>
      <category>Reader Questions</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Hey, folks--<br /><br />
Sorry I've been awol for a few days... I was actually out of town with very little
Internet access, and I just got back late last night-- so I haven't been able to post
for a while!<br /><br />
Second of all, thanks for the posts and emails re: <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/JONS+QUESTION+Can+Older+Writers+Get+Into+Hollywood+Writing+Programs.aspx">last
week's <b>ageism</b> question from Jon in <b>Iowa</b></a>.  
<br /><br />
First-- kudos to Lisa, who is moving to L.A. to be a TV writer after discovering "<i>that
the main thing holding me back is me and not my age</i>."  Congratulations, <b>Lisa</b>--
I'm so excited for you, and please keep in touch and let me know how it goes! 
I'll probably need you to hire me someday!<br /><br />
And then <b>Jon</b> wrote in with a follow-up question...<br /><br /><i>"Do you think your comments apply equally to feature film screenwriting, as 
<br />
opposed to TV writing? As you pointed out, a TV writer will be looked at with the
thought, 'Can this writer function on our writing staff on a day to day, season to
season basis?', versus a one time feature film writer, where the script should speak
for itself, it's either good or it isn't, whether written by a 24 or 64 year old.
There is no continuing relationship with the film writer, like there would be in TV.
Do older writers face slightly fewer obstacles writing a feature film as opposed to
trying to write for TV?"</i><br /><br />
Well, Jon-- I think it often can be "easier" for a first-timer to sell a project in
film than it is in TV (and "easier" does not mean "easy") because of exactly what
you say: selling a project in film doesn't require a long-lasting relationship with
the writer.<br /><br />
Having said that, 2 (and a half) things:<br /><br />
1)  There are many "older" screenwriters working in Hollywood today.  Playwright <b>David
Hare</b>, who wrote "<b>The Reader</b>," is about to turn 62.  <b>Thomas McCarthy</b>,
who wrote the <b>Oscar-nominated</b> "<b>The Visitor</b>," is 43.  <b>Susannah
Grant</b> ("<b>The Soloist</b>") is 46.  (Although for the record, I don't think
40's is that old in Hollywood anymore.)<br /><br />
1.5)  A caveat just to torpedo my own thesis: last summer, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990805.html?categoryid=29&amp;cs=1">ICM
settled a lawsuit</a> from a bunch of over-40 writers who sued <b>ICM</b> for age
discrimination.  Click <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990805.html?categoryid=29&amp;cs=1"><b>HERE</b></a> to
read.<br /><br />
2)  It's still incredibly hard for a first-timer to sell something, and I think
the obstacles that face older newcomers are the same obstacles facing younger newcomers. 
Namely: it still takes an infinite number of man-hours to write a sellable script...
and it still takes contacts and relationships.<br /><br />
A little over a year ago, <b>Hollywood</b> was abuzz with <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117987709.html?categoryid=3173&amp;cs=1">the
story of <b>Michael Martin</b></a>, a 27-year-old toll-booth-worker who wrote a spec
feature called "<b>Brooklyn's Finest</b>"... and sold it.  People loved-- and
were shocked and amazed-- by this underdog story... which I think is relevant here
because MICHAEL WAS ONLY 27.  In other words-- it's shocking to Hollywood when
ANY "noboby" sells something... even if he's only 27, which is certainly not old by
Hollywood screenwriting standards.<br /><br />
Now, a couple other interesting (and often overlooked) things about the Michael Martin
story...<br /><br />
A)  Michael wasn't exactly a first-time screenwriter.  He'd studied film
in college, so he had some knowledge, and maybe even some contacts.<br /><br />
B)  Michael submitted "Brooklyn's Finest" to a contest... and contests are open
to anyone, regardless of age.  He didn't win... and contests don't always (even
rarely) result in scripts making their way to producers, but his managed to get to
someone.  If the script is as good as "Brooklyn's Finest," the same thing could
happen to anyone, anywhere, of any age.<br /><br />
C)  "Brooklyn's Finest" didn't sell immediately.  It actually landed Michael
a job... writing "<b>New Jack City 2</b>."  I think this is important, because
many screenwriters NEVER sell anything-- but make a very nice living getting hired
onto projects and doing rewrites.  But in order to do that... you must LIVE IN <b>LOS
ANGELES</b> (or maybe New York, like Michael) and have the time and flexibility to
take meetings, meet the appropriate contacts, nurture the appropriate relationships,
etc.  And like we discussed before, "older" people often don't have that flexibility...
not because they're "older," but because they often have lives and lifestyles-- full-time
jobs, families, obligations-- that don't allow them to commit to the 24/7 lifestyle
of being a budding screenwriter.  (Of course, Michael Martin blows that whole
theory to hell, but Hollywood is an industry of exceptions... and he is CERTAINLY
an exception.  So the next Michael Martin we read about could be a 59-year-old
plumber in Dallas!)<br /><br />
So what's all this mean?  Selling ANYTHING in Hollywood, especially for a newbie,
is hard... near impossible... whether you're a 27-year-old in NY or a 64-year-old
in IA.  Is it harder for someone older?  Yeah, probably.  Does that
mean there's ageism?  Not necessarily.<br /><br />
But as writers, I think the question we should be asking ourselves-- no matter how
old we are-- is NOT "Why can't I sell something?"  It's "How can my work be better?" 
And once it's better: "How can it be even BETTER?"  And once it's even BETTER:
"My work's not good enough... how can I make it still BETTER?!"<br /><br />
The truth is: THOSE are the questions that will make your script good enough to sell...
no matter your birth date.<br /><br />
Also, for a great article on ageism, check out "<a href="http://www.writersstore.com/article.php?articles_id=5"><b>How
Old is Too Old To Be a Screenwriter?</b></a>" by <b>D.B. Gilles</b>, author of "<b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0609804952?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0609804952">The
Screenwriter Within: How to Turn the Movie in Your Head into a Salable Screenplay</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0609804952" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1" /></b>"
and "<b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312347383?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0312347383">The
Portable Film School</a></b>."<br /><br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032" />
      </body>
      <title>Older Writers - Part II</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Older+Writers+Part+II.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hey, folks--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sorry I've been awol for a few days... I was actually out of town with very little
Internet access, and I just got back late last night-- so I haven't been able to post
for a while!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Second of all, thanks for the posts and emails re: &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/JONS+QUESTION+Can+Older+Writers+Get+Into+Hollywood+Writing+Programs.aspx"&gt;last
week's &lt;b&gt;ageism&lt;/b&gt; question from Jon in &lt;b&gt;Iowa&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First-- kudos to Lisa, who is moving to L.A. to be a TV writer after discovering "&lt;i&gt;that
the main thing holding me back is me and not my age&lt;/i&gt;."&amp;nbsp; Congratulations, &lt;b&gt;Lisa&lt;/b&gt;--
I'm so excited for you, and please keep in touch and let me know how it goes!&amp;nbsp;
I'll probably need you to hire me someday!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And then &lt;b&gt;Jon&lt;/b&gt; wrote in with a follow-up question...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;"Do you think your comments apply equally to feature film screenwriting, as 
&lt;br&gt;
opposed to TV writing? As you pointed out, a TV writer will be looked at with the
thought, 'Can this writer function on our writing staff on a day to day, season to
season basis?', versus a one time feature film writer, where the script should speak
for itself, it's either good or it isn't, whether written by a 24 or 64 year old.
There is no continuing relationship with the film writer, like there would be in TV.
Do older writers face slightly fewer obstacles writing a feature film as opposed to
trying to write for TV?"&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Well, Jon-- I think it often can be "easier" for a first-timer to sell a project in
film than it is in TV (and "easier" does not mean "easy") because of exactly what
you say: selling a project in film doesn't require a long-lasting relationship with
the writer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having said that, 2 (and a half) things:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1)&amp;nbsp; There are many "older" screenwriters working in Hollywood today.&amp;nbsp; Playwright &lt;b&gt;David
Hare&lt;/b&gt;, who wrote "&lt;b&gt;The Reader&lt;/b&gt;," is about to turn 62.&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Thomas McCarthy&lt;/b&gt;,
who wrote the &lt;b&gt;Oscar-nominated&lt;/b&gt; "&lt;b&gt;The Visitor&lt;/b&gt;," is 43.&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Susannah
Grant&lt;/b&gt; ("&lt;b&gt;The Soloist&lt;/b&gt;") is 46.&amp;nbsp; (Although for the record, I don't think
40's is that old in Hollywood anymore.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1.5)&amp;nbsp; A caveat just to torpedo my own thesis: last summer, &lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990805.html?categoryid=29&amp;amp;cs=1"&gt;ICM
settled a lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; from a bunch of over-40 writers who sued &lt;b&gt;ICM&lt;/b&gt; for age
discrimination.&amp;nbsp; Click &lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990805.html?categoryid=29&amp;amp;cs=1"&gt;&lt;b&gt;HERE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to
read.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2)&amp;nbsp; It's still incredibly hard for a first-timer to sell something, and I think
the obstacles that face older newcomers are the same obstacles facing younger newcomers.&amp;nbsp;
Namely: it still takes an infinite number of man-hours to write a sellable script...
and it still takes contacts and relationships.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A little over a year ago, &lt;b&gt;Hollywood&lt;/b&gt; was abuzz with &lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117987709.html?categoryid=3173&amp;amp;cs=1"&gt;the
story of &lt;b&gt;Michael Martin&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a 27-year-old toll-booth-worker who wrote a spec
feature called "&lt;b&gt;Brooklyn's Finest&lt;/b&gt;"... and sold it.&amp;nbsp; People loved-- and
were shocked and amazed-- by this underdog story... which I think is relevant here
because MICHAEL WAS ONLY 27.&amp;nbsp; In other words-- it's shocking to Hollywood when
ANY "noboby" sells something... even if he's only 27, which is certainly not old by
Hollywood screenwriting standards.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, a couple other interesting (and often overlooked) things about the Michael Martin
story...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A)&amp;nbsp; Michael wasn't exactly a first-time screenwriter.&amp;nbsp; He'd studied film
in college, so he had some knowledge, and maybe even some contacts.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
B)&amp;nbsp; Michael submitted "Brooklyn's Finest" to a contest... and contests are open
to anyone, regardless of age.&amp;nbsp; He didn't win... and contests don't always (even
rarely) result in scripts making their way to producers, but his managed to get to
someone.&amp;nbsp; If the script is as good as "Brooklyn's Finest," the same thing could
happen to anyone, anywhere, of any age.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
C)&amp;nbsp; "Brooklyn's Finest" didn't sell immediately.&amp;nbsp; It actually landed Michael
a job... writing "&lt;b&gt;New Jack City 2&lt;/b&gt;."&amp;nbsp; I think this is important, because
many screenwriters NEVER sell anything-- but make a very nice living getting hired
onto projects and doing rewrites.&amp;nbsp; But in order to do that... you must LIVE IN &lt;b&gt;LOS
ANGELES&lt;/b&gt; (or maybe New York, like Michael) and have the time and flexibility to
take meetings, meet the appropriate contacts, nurture the appropriate relationships,
etc.&amp;nbsp; And like we discussed before, "older" people often don't have that flexibility...
not because they're "older," but because they often have lives and lifestyles-- full-time
jobs, families, obligations-- that don't allow them to commit to the 24/7 lifestyle
of being a budding screenwriter.&amp;nbsp; (Of course, Michael Martin blows that whole
theory to hell, but Hollywood is an industry of exceptions... and he is CERTAINLY
an exception.&amp;nbsp; So the next Michael Martin we read about could be a 59-year-old
plumber in Dallas!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So what's all this mean?&amp;nbsp; Selling ANYTHING in Hollywood, especially for a newbie,
is hard... near impossible... whether you're a 27-year-old in NY or a 64-year-old
in IA.&amp;nbsp; Is it harder for someone older?&amp;nbsp; Yeah, probably.&amp;nbsp; Does that
mean there's ageism?&amp;nbsp; Not necessarily.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But as writers, I think the question we should be asking ourselves-- no matter how
old we are-- is NOT "Why can't I sell something?"&amp;nbsp; It's "How can my work be better?"&amp;nbsp;
And once it's better: "How can it be even BETTER?"&amp;nbsp; And once it's even BETTER:
"My work's not good enough... how can I make it still BETTER?!"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The truth is: THOSE are the questions that will make your script good enough to sell...
no matter your birth date.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, for a great article on ageism, check out "&lt;a href="http://www.writersstore.com/article.php?articles_id=5"&gt;&lt;b&gt;How
Old is Too Old To Be a Screenwriter?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;" by &lt;b&gt;D.B. Gilles&lt;/b&gt;, author of "&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0609804952?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0609804952"&gt;The
Screenwriter Within: How to Turn the Movie in Your Head into a Salable Screenplay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=scrinote-20&amp;amp;l=as2&amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;a=0609804952" alt="" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" border="0" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;"
and "&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312347383?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=scrinote-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0312347383"&gt;The
Portable Film School&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,140785bb-b4ae-4aeb-be50-82d50f51d032.aspx</comments>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Interesting Talking Points</category>
      <category>Reader Questions</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Huge thanks to <b>Brenda</b> for pointing out <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118001734.html?categoryid=1236&amp;cs=1">this
piece from today's <i><b>Variety</b></i></a>, which reports that <b>Marvel</b>-- the
comic book/production company behind <i><b>Spiderman, Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk,
Thor,</b></i> etc.-- is putting together a group of writers, a la the <b>Disney Fellowship
Program</b>, dedicated solely to adapting Marvel comic books into movies!<br /><br />
Very cool!<br /><br />
Click <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118001734.html?categoryid=1236&amp;cs=1"><b>HERE</b></a> to
check out the <i>Variety</i> article...<br /><br />
And here are a couple other interesting links:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/what-a-marvel-ous-idea-for-screenwriters/"><b>Nikki
Finke</b></a><br /><a href="http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/03/27/marvel-assembles-movie-writing-teams-iron-fist-black-panther-cable-films-planned/"><b>MTV</b></a><br /><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e" />
      </body>
      <title>Wanna Write a Comic Book Movie?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Wanna+Write+A+Comic+Book+Movie.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:21:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Huge thanks to &lt;b&gt;Brenda&lt;/b&gt; for pointing out &lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118001734.html?categoryid=1236&amp;amp;cs=1"&gt;this
piece from today's &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Variety&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, which reports that &lt;b&gt;Marvel&lt;/b&gt;-- the
comic book/production company behind &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Spiderman, Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk,
Thor,&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; etc.-- is putting together a group of writers, a la the &lt;b&gt;Disney Fellowship
Program&lt;/b&gt;, dedicated solely to adapting Marvel comic books into movies!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Very cool!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Click &lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118001734.html?categoryid=1236&amp;amp;cs=1"&gt;&lt;b&gt;HERE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to
check out the &lt;i&gt;Variety&lt;/i&gt; article...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And here are a couple other interesting links:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/what-a-marvel-ous-idea-for-screenwriters/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nikki
Finke&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/03/27/marvel-assembles-movie-writing-teams-iron-fist-black-panther-cable-films-planned/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;MTV&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,1060ede9-9012-47a2-a24c-a7f14a02a52e.aspx</comments>
      <category>Industry Updates</category>
      <category>Jobs Contests Opportunities</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Hey, folks—<br /><br />
Today’s <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"><b>Pitch
Workshop</b></a> entry comes from <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx"><b>Mary
S.</b></a>, who sends in a <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx">logline</a> for
her feature romantic comedy.  Take a look…<br /><br />
First of all—Mary, thank you so much for sending this in!  Secondly, thanks to
everyone who has already offered Mary their feedback and criticism… I hope it was
helpful, Mary… and feel free to keep it coming!<br /><br />
And now, <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx">here’s
Mary’s logline</a>…<br /><br /><i>"In the feature length romantic comedy, <u>American Breakfast</u>, a bi-cultural
young Latino flees an unjust U.S. sentence and clears away the wreckage of his irresponsible
past in a quirky coastal Mexican village where he finds love, acceptance and a new
life."</i><br /><br />
And here are my thoughts…<br /><b><br />
WHAT I LIKE:</b><br />
I think you’re starting from a great place, Mary, because your story has a wonderfully
strong emotional arc.  Stories about redemption can be incredibly powerful, and <b><i>American
Breakfast</i></b> is very acutely about redemption.  I think you’ve also done
a nice job of setting up two different worlds to reflect your hero’s emotional journey;
he travels from an unjust <b>U.S.</b> to an accepting <b>Mexican</b> village… just
as he travels from irresponsibility to maturity—so some important touchstones of your
story are already in place.<br /><br /><b>WHAT I’D WORK ON:</b><br />
You’ve gotten some <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx">good
feedback from readers</a> so far… I think everyone’s dead-on when they say the logline
needs more details.  First of all, what’s the main character’s name?  Giving
him a name will help us humanize and relate to him.  But even beyond that—it’d
be nice to have some details to help illuminate the interesting parts of the logline. 
What was his unjust U.S. sentence (murder, robbery, terrorism, etc.)?  Why was
his past irresponsible… did he have a child out of wedlock?  Leave his wife? 
Abandon his starving family?  How does he flee the U.S.?  Does he run away
and escape?  Does he serve his unjust sentence and bolt?  Some fleshing
out of these vague areas will help give the story the specificity it needs to come
to life.<br /><br />
Having said that…<br /><br />
For me, there are two looming holes which beg the biggest questions…<br /><br /><b>HOLE #1:</b>  You say this is a romantic comedy, but—put most simply—<i>WHERE'S
THE ROMANCE?!</i>  Romantic comedies are never about just one person, they’re
about a relationship… Harold and Maude’s May/December romance (<i><b>Harold &amp;
Maude</b></i>), Harry and Sally’s friendship (<i><b>When Harry Met Sally</b></i>), <b>Ben</b> and <b>Alison</b>’s
fears and frustrations facing parenthood (<i><b>Knocked Up</b></i>).  You wouldn’t
pitch any of those movies by describing just one person… you’d illustrate each of
those relationships, bringing it to life so your audience could understand it and—hopefully—see
some reflection of their own life in it.  So I’m not even sure it’s POSSIBLE
to pitch a romantic comedy where the logline focuses on something other than the dynamic
between two characters.  Unfortunately, the <i>American Breakfast</i> logline
doesn’t even MENTION another character—so I’m not sure how this is a romantic comedy
at all.  (That doesn’t mean it’s NOT a romantic comedy.  Perhaps the logline
needs to be revamped to focus on the romantic relationship at the core of the story,
or perhaps it’s just mislabeled and it’s not a romantic comedy after all.)<br /><br />
Refocusing the logline on a relationship doesn’t mean you have to ditch the themes
of redemption and justice you want to explore… it just means you need to study them
through the lens of your story’s particular romance.  Here, for instance, are
a couple sample loglines that tell a similar story… but through a more romantic lens:<br /><br /><i>•  When Mexican-American Carlos is framed for murder in Los Angeles, his only
hope of escape is to entrust his life to an impulsive—and gorgeous—female bounty hunter
who offers to return him to his Mexican village… as long as he will father her child.<br /><br />
•  When Carlos, a petty pick-pocket, decides to hide out in a Mexican village
to escape an unjust robbery sentence, he hopes to live under the radar forever… until
Penelope, a headstrong political lobbyist, mistakes him for an old ‘60’s activist
and convinces him to join her campaign.</i><br /><br />
I’m not saying either of those is good—or the story you want to tell—I’m just saying
they each focus on a romance… you can see where the comedy will come from… and they
don’t completely sacrifice the spirit or themes of the original.<br /><br />
(Having said that, maybe your script ISN’T ultimately meant to be a romantic-comedy—it’s
just mislabeled—in which case I’d just remove the label.)<br /><br /><br /><b>HOLE #2:</b>  I think the other big missing chunk here is… WE NEED TO MORE
INFO ABOUT THE VILLAGE HE’S GOING TO.  I know I say this a lot, but all stories—at
their core—are about RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS… and if <i>American
Breakfast</i> isn’t a traditional romantic comedy about a relationship between two
people, it’s CERTAINLY about a relationship between your hero and this village.<br /><br />
For me, there are two ways to go with this, and while neither is better or worse,
each path makes it a very different story.  So is this village… A) your hero’s
hometown, or is it B) a totally new place?  Here’s the difference…<br /><br />
If the village is your hero’s hometown (like in <i><b>Beautiful Girls</b></i> or <i><b>Ed</b></i>),
he’s returning to a place full of history and “ghosts,” where he already has relationships…
and probably damaged relationships he never wanted to return to.  <i>American
Breakfast</i> then becomes a redemption story about a guy returning home to repair
broken pieces of the life he’d left behind.<br /><br />
But if the village is a totally new place (like in <i><b>Doc Hollywood</b></i>, <i><b>Northern
Exposure</b></i>, or <a href="http://disney.go.com/disneyvideos/animatedfilms/cars/"><i><b>Cars</b></i></a>),
it becomes a world that opens your hero’s eyes to new people, relationships, and opportunities. 
Only in this new land can he shed his “irresponsible” past and become the man he’s
always wanted to be.  In this case, <i>American Breakfast</i> becomes a redemption
story about an outsider who—thanks to the magic of this special village—washes away
the sins of his past to become a whole new person.<br /><br />
Neither of these story-paths is better than the other… but I think choosing one (or
another one that I’m not thinking of right now) will help fill out your particular
movie and help us understand your main character’s journey.  (I’m also guessing
you may know—somewhere in your head—exactly which village it is… it’s just not articulated
in the logline.  But if not… think about it; it’s an important question.)<br /><br />
Anyway, Mary—you’re off to a great start, and I hope this feedback is helpful!<br /><br />
Everyone else—if you have a logline or short synopsis you’d like to submit to the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"><b>Script
Notes Pitch Workshop</b></a>, feel free to post it in any of the comments sections…
or email it to <b>WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com</b>.  You can also email me with thoughts,
suggestions, or questions about writing, the industry, or anything else!<br /><br />
In the mean time, keep reading… we’ve got some cool stuff coming up: book reviews,
movie reviews, reader questions, and more <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx">pitch
submissions</a>!<br /><br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989" />
      </body>
      <title>PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #7 Feedback</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+Entry+7+Feedback.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hey, folks—&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Today’s &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pitch
Workshop&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; entry comes from &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mary
S.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, who sends in a &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx"&gt;logline&lt;/a&gt; for
her feature romantic comedy.&amp;nbsp; Take a look…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First of all—Mary, thank you so much for sending this in!&amp;nbsp; Secondly, thanks to
everyone who has already offered Mary their feedback and criticism… I hope it was
helpful, Mary… and feel free to keep it coming!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And now, &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx"&gt;here’s
Mary’s logline&lt;/a&gt;…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;"In the feature length romantic comedy, &lt;u&gt;American Breakfast&lt;/u&gt;, a bi-cultural
young Latino flees an unjust U.S. sentence and clears away the wreckage of his irresponsible
past in a quirky coastal Mexican village where he finds love, acceptance and a new
life."&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And here are my thoughts…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WHAT I LIKE:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think you’re starting from a great place, Mary, because your story has a wonderfully
strong emotional arc.&amp;nbsp; Stories about redemption can be incredibly powerful, and &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;American
Breakfast&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; is very acutely about redemption.&amp;nbsp; I think you’ve also done
a nice job of setting up two different worlds to reflect your hero’s emotional journey;
he travels from an unjust &lt;b&gt;U.S.&lt;/b&gt; to an accepting &lt;b&gt;Mexican&lt;/b&gt; village… just
as he travels from irresponsibility to maturity—so some important touchstones of your
story are already in place.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;WHAT I’D WORK ON:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You’ve gotten some &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,89cc5168-9e58-40e6-8926-efc6f82fa08a.aspx"&gt;good
feedback from readers&lt;/a&gt; so far… I think everyone’s dead-on when they say the logline
needs more details.&amp;nbsp; First of all, what’s the main character’s name?&amp;nbsp; Giving
him a name will help us humanize and relate to him.&amp;nbsp; But even beyond that—it’d
be nice to have some details to help illuminate the interesting parts of the logline.&amp;nbsp;
What was his unjust U.S. sentence (murder, robbery, terrorism, etc.)?&amp;nbsp; Why was
his past irresponsible… did he have a child out of wedlock?&amp;nbsp; Leave his wife?&amp;nbsp;
Abandon his starving family?&amp;nbsp; How does he flee the U.S.?&amp;nbsp; Does he run away
and escape?&amp;nbsp; Does he serve his unjust sentence and bolt?&amp;nbsp; Some fleshing
out of these vague areas will help give the story the specificity it needs to come
to life.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having said that…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For me, there are two looming holes which beg the biggest questions…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;HOLE #1:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; You say this is a romantic comedy, but—put most simply—&lt;i&gt;WHERE'S
THE ROMANCE?!&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp; Romantic comedies are never about just one person, they’re
about a relationship… Harold and Maude’s May/December romance (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Harold &amp;amp;
Maude&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;), Harry and Sally’s friendship (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;When Harry Met Sally&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;), &lt;b&gt;Ben&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Alison&lt;/b&gt;’s
fears and frustrations facing parenthood (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Knocked Up&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&amp;nbsp; You wouldn’t
pitch any of those movies by describing just one person… you’d illustrate each of
those relationships, bringing it to life so your audience could understand it and—hopefully—see
some reflection of their own life in it.&amp;nbsp; So I’m not even sure it’s POSSIBLE
to pitch a romantic comedy where the logline focuses on something other than the dynamic
between two characters.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, the &lt;i&gt;American Breakfast&lt;/i&gt; logline
doesn’t even MENTION another character—so I’m not sure how this is a romantic comedy
at all.&amp;nbsp; (That doesn’t mean it’s NOT a romantic comedy.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps the logline
needs to be revamped to focus on the romantic relationship at the core of the story,
or perhaps it’s just mislabeled and it’s not a romantic comedy after all.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Refocusing the logline on a relationship doesn’t mean you have to ditch the themes
of redemption and justice you want to explore… it just means you need to study them
through the lens of your story’s particular romance.&amp;nbsp; Here, for instance, are
a couple sample loglines that tell a similar story… but through a more romantic lens:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;•&amp;nbsp; When Mexican-American Carlos is framed for murder in Los Angeles, his only
hope of escape is to entrust his life to an impulsive—and gorgeous—female bounty hunter
who offers to return him to his Mexican village… as long as he will father her child.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; When Carlos, a petty pick-pocket, decides to hide out in a Mexican village
to escape an unjust robbery sentence, he hopes to live under the radar forever… until
Penelope, a headstrong political lobbyist, mistakes him for an old ‘60’s activist
and convinces him to join her campaign.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I’m not saying either of those is good—or the story you want to tell—I’m just saying
they each focus on a romance… you can see where the comedy will come from… and they
don’t completely sacrifice the spirit or themes of the original.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(Having said that, maybe your script ISN’T ultimately meant to be a romantic-comedy—it’s
just mislabeled—in which case I’d just remove the label.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;HOLE #2:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; I think the other big missing chunk here is… WE NEED TO MORE
INFO ABOUT THE VILLAGE HE’S GOING TO.&amp;nbsp; I know I say this a lot, but all stories—at
their core—are about RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS, RELATIONSHIPS… and if &lt;i&gt;American
Breakfast&lt;/i&gt; isn’t a traditional romantic comedy about a relationship between two
people, it’s CERTAINLY about a relationship between your hero and this village.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For me, there are two ways to go with this, and while neither is better or worse,
each path makes it a very different story.&amp;nbsp; So is this village… A) your hero’s
hometown, or is it B) a totally new place?&amp;nbsp; Here’s the difference…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If the village is your hero’s hometown (like in &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Beautiful Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ed&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;),
he’s returning to a place full of history and “ghosts,” where he already has relationships…
and probably damaged relationships he never wanted to return to.&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;American
Breakfast&lt;/i&gt; then becomes a redemption story about a guy returning home to repair
broken pieces of the life he’d left behind.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But if the village is a totally new place (like in &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Doc Hollywood&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Northern
Exposure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, or &lt;a href="http://disney.go.com/disneyvideos/animatedfilms/cars/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cars&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;),
it becomes a world that opens your hero’s eyes to new people, relationships, and opportunities.&amp;nbsp;
Only in this new land can he shed his “irresponsible” past and become the man he’s
always wanted to be.&amp;nbsp; In this case, &lt;i&gt;American Breakfast&lt;/i&gt; becomes a redemption
story about an outsider who—thanks to the magic of this special village—washes away
the sins of his past to become a whole new person.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Neither of these story-paths is better than the other… but I think choosing one (or
another one that I’m not thinking of right now) will help fill out your particular
movie and help us understand your main character’s journey.&amp;nbsp; (I’m also guessing
you may know—somewhere in your head—exactly which village it is… it’s just not articulated
in the logline.&amp;nbsp; But if not… think about it; it’s an important question.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, Mary—you’re off to a great start, and I hope this feedback is helpful!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Everyone else—if you have a logline or short synopsis you’d like to submit to the &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Script
Notes Pitch Workshop&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, feel free to post it in any of the comments sections…
or email it to &lt;b&gt;WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp; You can also email me with thoughts,
suggestions, or questions about writing, the industry, or anything else!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the mean time, keep reading… we’ve got some cool stuff coming up: book reviews,
movie reviews, reader questions, and more &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;pitch
submissions&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,768bc3cb-b9ac-43d6-bb2f-451ecd9f5989.aspx</comments>
      <category>Pitching</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Hey, guys—<br /><br />
Wanted to take some time today to respond to our most recent submission to the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"><b>Script
Notes Pitch Workshop</b></a>.  Thanks to <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx"><b>Matt</b></a> for
submitting his work, and thanks also to <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx"><b>Janine</b></a> for
her thoughtful online response.  <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx">Matt</a>,
I hope you found <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx">Janine’s
thoughts</a> helpful, and I just thought I’d add my own two cents.<br /><br />
For those who are new to the discussion, here’s <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx">Matt’s
synopsis</a>…<br /><br /><i>Title: <b>Downsize This!</b><br />
Genre: Romantic Comedy<br /><br />
"Love in the Time of Downsizing"<br /><br />
Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for
self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with
an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in
6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish
- and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.<br /><br />
But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric,
alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing;
he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence -
that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate
future within the company.<br /><br />
It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that
he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident;
a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face
during these tough economic times.<br /><br />
Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling
his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his
professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance
prize.<br /><br />
In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really
worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?<br /></i><br /><br />
WHAT I LIKE:<br />
I’ll be honest, Matt—I am a total sucker for stories about people trying to get fired. 
I think there is something absolutely hilarious about people behaving inappropriately
in corporate/work environments.  A couple years ago, <b>CBS</b> and <b>LMNO Productions</b> did
a reality show called <i><b>F</b><b>ire Me, Please</b></i>, where employees had to
compete to get fired without their bosses catching on.  It was—for all intents
and purposes—a miserable failure… but I loved it.  So I think “Downsize This!”
begins from a strong comedic starting place… the kind of premise that immediately
allows you to brainstorm scores of hilarious scenarios.  <br /><br />
You’ve also given Steve a strong, relatable want… to get fired and get a severance
package, which is something we’ve all dreamed of, especially working at jobs we despise. 
So right off the bat, you’re in a good place to generate story… you have a fertile
premise and a character with a solid objective, both of which put you in a good starting
posigion.<br /><br /><br />
WHAT I’D WORK ON:<br />
I agree with <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx">Janine’s
comments</a>… despite having a strong starting place, I think there are a lot of confusing
elements in this synopsis, and they’re muddying both your A-story (Steve trying to
get fired) and your B-story (Steve trying to win Alice).<br /><br />
While I obviously haven’t talked to you at all about your story, my sense—simply from
readying the synopsis—is that much of the confusion is coming from a flaw in your
writing process, and that flaw is this…<br /><br />
I think you’re creating story situations based on things you, the storyteller, WANT
to have happen… or things you think SHOULD happen… rather than creating story situations
by letting characters and events play out organically.<br /><br />
I know that sounds like a weird note, since we—as storytellers—are obviously in control
of our stories and responsible for creative decisions, but being creatively responsible
doesn’t necessarily mean we can simply wrench stories and characters in any direction
we want; in fact, it often means that while we do indeed CREATE a story, we must also
SERVE the story… or, rather, do what is right for the story… make it as relatable,
believable, and powerful as possible—even if that means sacrificing things we want
to happen.<br /><br />
The reason I say this in regard to “Downsize This” is that while your movie has a
wonderful premise, it feels like many of its actions, events, and characters don’t
behave in ways that seem honest, familiar, or true to human behavior.  And since
your premise is so ripe… and Steve’s want is so strong… your audience immediately
has visions of how this story “should” play out.  Thus, when your characters
behave in contradiction to those expectations, it makes it very hard to believe in
them or their world.  This doesn’t mean your story should be predictable; it
just means it needs to operate within the “rules” and expectations of how we believe
people would act in the situation you’ve set up.<br /><br />
For instance… Steve is a “miserable, cantankerous SOB” who has been trying to get
downsized for a long time.  But instead of firing him—even in “tough economic
times”—his company puts him into a six-week “Wellness Program” to change his attitude. 
Well, first of all—I’ve never heard of a company that puts troublemakers through their
own “attitude rehab.”  Companies may put an employee on probation, but they don’t
usually put them through a six-week readjustment program.  Why wouldn’t they
just fire Steve?  He’s a bad worker who doesn’t want to be there… why spend six
weeks of valuable time, money, and energy trying to “fix” him?<br /><br />
Then, Steve meets Alice… and he INSTANTANEOUSLY becomes a new person: cool, confident
and charismatic.  Now, love is a powerful thing… but I’m not sure it can instantly
change someone from “miserable” and “cantankerous” to cool, confident and charismatic. 
This just doesn’t seem like believable behavior… or at least, none I’ve ever seen
in the real world.  First of all—how does Steve change so dramatically so quickly? 
Second of all—it’s tough to swallow that such a miserable jerk would so quickly fall
in love.  And while you say it’s a “façade,” that confuses things even more:
does Steve actually like Alice?  Because if he DOES, then it’s NOT a façade;
it’s a sincere attempt to be a better person and win her heart.  And if he doesn’t
like her, then why should we care about their relationship?  Or, more importantly,
why is she even in the story?<br /><br />
I also don’t buy that Steve’s boss—who knew Steve was such an asshole he had him put
in a “wellness program”—would be so instantly duped by his transformation that he
would suddenly make Steve the “new face of the company.”  I mean, the boss knew
what Steve was like before… so wouldn’t be super-skeptical of this “new Steve?” 
Even if he wasn’t skeptical, why would he make this guy—who less than two months earlier
was on the verge of getting fired—the “new face” of the company?<br /><br />
Along those same lines, why do all these women who knew the “old Steve” suddenly fall
head-over-heels for the “new Steve?”  Most men spend a lifetime trying to find
that kind of female-attracting behavior, and Steve—a known misanthrope—suddenly fakes
(after meeting ONE GIRL) and all the other women fall for it.  I don’t buy that
Steve—or anyone—could do that… and I don’t buy that all these women are stupid enough
to fall for it.<br /><br />
Perhaps most importantly, if Steve’s incredible ability to be a brilliant businessman
was nestled just below the surface… why didn’t he ever step up before?  I mean,
once Steve meets Alice, he becomes a virtual superhero, possessing nearly inhuman
business savvy and romantic prowess.  So where were these skills before? 
I suppose you could say he hated his job so he never used them, but I don’t believe
that someone in possession of these kinds of skills is an antisocial bum.  Why
couldn’t he have just gotten another job?  Or why wasn’t he using these skills
all along to get ahead, pick up chicks, dupe his boss, etc.?<br /><br />
Now, Matt—I know it seems like I’m really ripping apart every beat of your story here,
and in a way I am.  But here’s why I said earlier I think your process is flawed
and you’re trying to twist the story in directions it doesn’t want to go…<br /><br />
I can see how each of these moments would work and be funny… in their own movie. 
We’ve all seen movies—and will see many more—about losers who acquire business/romantic
skills and find themselves catapulted to the top of the social food chain (<i><b>What
Women Want, Love Potion #9</b><b></b></i>).  We’ve all seen movies about guys
who work to become different people to win a girl (<i><b>Hitch</b><b></b></i>). 
We’ve seen movies about people pretending to be someone they’re not to get ahead in
the corporate world (<i><b>The Secret of My Success, Working Girl, Taking Care of
Business</b><b></b></i>).  We’ve all seen movies that satirize and condemn the
corporate world (<i><b>Office Space</b><b></b></i>).  <br /><br />
So each of your story moments could be very effective, Matt… and I understand why
you like them all.  But that doesn’t mean they all belong in the same movie…
and combining them seems to blur the story you really want to tell.<br /><br />
My advice: think about the story you really want to tell, the story scratching and
clawing its way out of your imagination.  Don’t pick the story you think is the
most commercial… or even the most original… or the easiest to shoot on a low-budget…
or the easiest to make as a summer tentpole… or the best to get you into film school. 
Pick the one story that will haunt you and eat at you if you DON’T tell it.<br /><br />
Once you’ve done that, write your logline.  This isn’t so you an pitch it easily
and quickly; it’s so you have—in short sentence form—the core essence of your screenplay.
For sake of this example, let’s say your logline is…<br /><br />
“When Steve, a cantankerous misanthrope, learns his company will be laying off its
ten lowest-performing employees and giving them severance packages, he becomes determined
to under-perform his co-workers, get fired, and use the money to achieve his dream:
starting his own comic book store.”<br /><br />
Print this out and tape it above your desk.  As you continue to work, refer back
to this logline as often as you need to to make sure your story is laser-focused and
not veering off in weird directions.<br /><br />
Next step: brainstorming.  I usually like to do this somewhere other than the
place where I do most of my writing.  I’ll go outside… or to the park… or a café…
or the swimming pool.  Anywhere where I can feel unconfined and free of the environment
where I do most of my other thinking and working.  Personally, I think it’s tough
to do “new” thinking when you’re surrounded by “old” environments.<br /><br />
Take a pad and brainstorm all the things Steve might do to try and achieve his goal.  
Don’t censor yourself as you write… simply let as many ideas as possible flow from
your brain to your pencil and onto the paper.  Never let your pencil stop moving. 
Even if you’re scribbling lame, ridiculous ideas… let them come.  A strong premise—whether
comedy or drama—should generate a nearly infinite number of ideas.  <br /><br />
Just looking at the above Steve/comic book shop example, I’m gonna do a quick brainstorming
session.  Here we go, right off the top of my head…<br /><br />
WAYS STEVE MIGHT TRY TO GET FIRED/LAID OFF<br />
•  Never turn in any work<br />
•  Show up late<br />
•  Sleep with the boss’s wife<br />
•  Sleep with the boss’s daughter<br />
•  Dress like a clown<br />
•  Fart wherever he goes<br />
•  Eat lunch without a fork or spoon—just put his face right in the plate<br />
•  Only communicate by singing<br />
•  Hop everywhere he goes<br />
•  Call his co-workers names<br />
•  Pee himself constantly<br />
•  Wear his clothes backwards<br />
•  Start selling off the office equipment<br /><br />
Now, I’m not saying any of those or good, funny, or even helpful idea.  What
I AM saying is this: I typed those in about 30 seconds of spur-of-the-moment thinking. 
If you were to spend even just an hour doing this, you’d have HUNDREDS of ideas.<br /><br />
Your job is then to pick the best of those (and by “best,” I mean those that are the
most true and honest to Steve’s character, his want, and the world of the story—not
those that you most want to happen), and begin to think about what would logically
happen if they were to happen.  <br /><br />
For instance, if Steve started communicating only by singing, he’d probably annoy
and anger a lot of people… at first.  But then maybe people would grow to like
his singing—maybe it’s a cheerful break in an otherwise dreary workplace—and the office
would institute musical Fridays, allowing people to play CD’s and listen to radios. 
So Steve would need to think of a new tactic.  Perhaps he tries to sleep with
his boss’s wife… only to discover that his boss and his wife have an open marriage,
and his boss wants to join them.<br /><br />
Again—I’m not saying ANY of these ideas are right for the story you want to tell. 
I’m simply trying to concoct examples that are on-point for Steve’s objective and
have a cause-effect relationship that seems believable… in both our world and your
story-world.<br /><br />
Anyway, Matt—like I said earlier, I think you have a strong comic premise and a character
with a great want; my sense is that you simply got sidetracked by subplots and story
elements that seemed interesting, but weren’t necessarily integral to your main story. 
I even think that as you go back and reconstruct your story, focusing on your A-story,
you’ll see how the B-story (the Alice love story) can integrate itself more organically
without derailing everything else.<br /><br />
I hope this is helpful info… good luck with project, and lemme know how it goes!<br /><br />
For the rest of you, if you have loglines or summaries you’d like to submit to the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx">Script
Notes Pitch Workshop</a>, feel free to email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com, or simply
post them in a “comments section” here on the blog.<br /><br />
In the mean time, we’ve got some great stuff coming up… more Pitch Workshop submissions,
book reviews, some great website recommendations, and more questions from readers!<br /><br />
Have a good Sunday!<br /><br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1" />
      </body>
      <title>PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #6</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+Entry+6.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hey, guys—&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Wanted to take some time today to respond to our most recent submission to the &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Script
Notes Pitch Workshop&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Thanks to &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Matt&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; for
submitting his work, and thanks also to &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Janine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; for
her thoughtful online response.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx"&gt;Matt&lt;/a&gt;,
I hope you found &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx"&gt;Janine’s
thoughts&lt;/a&gt; helpful, and I just thought I’d add my own two cents.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those who are new to the discussion, here’s &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx"&gt;Matt’s
synopsis&lt;/a&gt;…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Title: &lt;b&gt;Downsize This!&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Genre: Romantic Comedy&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Love in the Time of Downsizing"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for
self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with
an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in
6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish
- and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric,
alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing;
he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence -
that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate
future within the company.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that
he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident;
a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face
during these tough economic times.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling
his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his
professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance
prize.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really
worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WHAT I LIKE:&lt;br&gt;
I’ll be honest, Matt—I am a total sucker for stories about people trying to get fired.&amp;nbsp;
I think there is something absolutely hilarious about people behaving inappropriately
in corporate/work environments.&amp;nbsp; A couple years ago, &lt;b&gt;CBS&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;LMNO Productions&lt;/b&gt; did
a reality show called &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;F&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;ire Me, Please&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, where employees had to
compete to get fired without their bosses catching on.&amp;nbsp; It was—for all intents
and purposes—a miserable failure… but I loved it.&amp;nbsp; So I think “Downsize This!”
begins from a strong comedic starting place… the kind of premise that immediately
allows you to brainstorm scores of hilarious scenarios. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You’ve also given Steve a strong, relatable want… to get fired and get a severance
package, which is something we’ve all dreamed of, especially working at jobs we despise.&amp;nbsp;
So right off the bat, you’re in a good place to generate story… you have a fertile
premise and a character with a solid objective, both of which put you in a good starting
posigion.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WHAT I’D WORK ON:&lt;br&gt;
I agree with &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx"&gt;Janine’s
comments&lt;/a&gt;… despite having a strong starting place, I think there are a lot of confusing
elements in this synopsis, and they’re muddying both your A-story (Steve trying to
get fired) and your B-story (Steve trying to win Alice).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
While I obviously haven’t talked to you at all about your story, my sense—simply from
readying the synopsis—is that much of the confusion is coming from a flaw in your
writing process, and that flaw is this…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think you’re creating story situations based on things you, the storyteller, WANT
to have happen… or things you think SHOULD happen… rather than creating story situations
by letting characters and events play out organically.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I know that sounds like a weird note, since we—as storytellers—are obviously in control
of our stories and responsible for creative decisions, but being creatively responsible
doesn’t necessarily mean we can simply wrench stories and characters in any direction
we want; in fact, it often means that while we do indeed CREATE a story, we must also
SERVE the story… or, rather, do what is right for the story… make it as relatable,
believable, and powerful as possible—even if that means sacrificing things we want
to happen.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The reason I say this in regard to “Downsize This” is that while your movie has a
wonderful premise, it feels like many of its actions, events, and characters don’t
behave in ways that seem honest, familiar, or true to human behavior.&amp;nbsp; And since
your premise is so ripe… and Steve’s want is so strong… your audience immediately
has visions of how this story “should” play out.&amp;nbsp; Thus, when your characters
behave in contradiction to those expectations, it makes it very hard to believe in
them or their world.&amp;nbsp; This doesn’t mean your story should be predictable; it
just means it needs to operate within the “rules” and expectations of how we believe
people would act in the situation you’ve set up.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For instance… Steve is a “miserable, cantankerous SOB” who has been trying to get
downsized for a long time.&amp;nbsp; But instead of firing him—even in “tough economic
times”—his company puts him into a six-week “Wellness Program” to change his attitude.&amp;nbsp;
Well, first of all—I’ve never heard of a company that puts troublemakers through their
own “attitude rehab.”&amp;nbsp; Companies may put an employee on probation, but they don’t
usually put them through a six-week readjustment program.&amp;nbsp; Why wouldn’t they
just fire Steve?&amp;nbsp; He’s a bad worker who doesn’t want to be there… why spend six
weeks of valuable time, money, and energy trying to “fix” him?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Then, Steve meets Alice… and he INSTANTANEOUSLY becomes a new person: cool, confident
and charismatic.&amp;nbsp; Now, love is a powerful thing… but I’m not sure it can instantly
change someone from “miserable” and “cantankerous” to cool, confident and charismatic.&amp;nbsp;
This just doesn’t seem like believable behavior… or at least, none I’ve ever seen
in the real world.&amp;nbsp; First of all—how does Steve change so dramatically so quickly?&amp;nbsp;
Second of all—it’s tough to swallow that such a miserable jerk would so quickly fall
in love.&amp;nbsp; And while you say it’s a “façade,” that confuses things even more:
does Steve actually like Alice?&amp;nbsp; Because if he DOES, then it’s NOT a façade;
it’s a sincere attempt to be a better person and win her heart.&amp;nbsp; And if he doesn’t
like her, then why should we care about their relationship?&amp;nbsp; Or, more importantly,
why is she even in the story?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I also don’t buy that Steve’s boss—who knew Steve was such an asshole he had him put
in a “wellness program”—would be so instantly duped by his transformation that he
would suddenly make Steve the “new face of the company.”&amp;nbsp; I mean, the boss knew
what Steve was like before… so wouldn’t be super-skeptical of this “new Steve?”&amp;nbsp;
Even if he wasn’t skeptical, why would he make this guy—who less than two months earlier
was on the verge of getting fired—the “new face” of the company?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Along those same lines, why do all these women who knew the “old Steve” suddenly fall
head-over-heels for the “new Steve?”&amp;nbsp; Most men spend a lifetime trying to find
that kind of female-attracting behavior, and Steve—a known misanthrope—suddenly fakes
(after meeting ONE GIRL) and all the other women fall for it.&amp;nbsp; I don’t buy that
Steve—or anyone—could do that… and I don’t buy that all these women are stupid enough
to fall for it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Perhaps most importantly, if Steve’s incredible ability to be a brilliant businessman
was nestled just below the surface… why didn’t he ever step up before?&amp;nbsp; I mean,
once Steve meets Alice, he becomes a virtual superhero, possessing nearly inhuman
business savvy and romantic prowess.&amp;nbsp; So where were these skills before?&amp;nbsp;
I suppose you could say he hated his job so he never used them, but I don’t believe
that someone in possession of these kinds of skills is an antisocial bum.&amp;nbsp; Why
couldn’t he have just gotten another job?&amp;nbsp; Or why wasn’t he using these skills
all along to get ahead, pick up chicks, dupe his boss, etc.?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, Matt—I know it seems like I’m really ripping apart every beat of your story here,
and in a way I am.&amp;nbsp; But here’s why I said earlier I think your process is flawed
and you’re trying to twist the story in directions it doesn’t want to go…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can see how each of these moments would work and be funny… in their own movie.&amp;nbsp;
We’ve all seen movies—and will see many more—about losers who acquire business/romantic
skills and find themselves catapulted to the top of the social food chain (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;What
Women Want, Love Potion #9&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&amp;nbsp; We’ve all seen movies about guys
who work to become different people to win a girl (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hitch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&amp;nbsp;
We’ve seen movies about people pretending to be someone they’re not to get ahead in
the corporate world (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Secret of My Success, Working Girl, Taking Care of
Business&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&amp;nbsp; We’ve all seen movies that satirize and condemn the
corporate world (&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Office Space&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;). &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So each of your story moments could be very effective, Matt… and I understand why
you like them all.&amp;nbsp; But that doesn’t mean they all belong in the same movie…
and combining them seems to blur the story you really want to tell.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My advice: think about the story you really want to tell, the story scratching and
clawing its way out of your imagination.&amp;nbsp; Don’t pick the story you think is the
most commercial… or even the most original… or the easiest to shoot on a low-budget…
or the easiest to make as a summer tentpole… or the best to get you into film school.&amp;nbsp;
Pick the one story that will haunt you and eat at you if you DON’T tell it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Once you’ve done that, write your logline.&amp;nbsp; This isn’t so you an pitch it easily
and quickly; it’s so you have—in short sentence form—the core essence of your screenplay.
For sake of this example, let’s say your logline is…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
“When Steve, a cantankerous misanthrope, learns his company will be laying off its
ten lowest-performing employees and giving them severance packages, he becomes determined
to under-perform his co-workers, get fired, and use the money to achieve his dream:
starting his own comic book store.”&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Print this out and tape it above your desk.&amp;nbsp; As you continue to work, refer back
to this logline as often as you need to to make sure your story is laser-focused and
not veering off in weird directions.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Next step: brainstorming.&amp;nbsp; I usually like to do this somewhere other than the
place where I do most of my writing.&amp;nbsp; I’ll go outside… or to the park… or a café…
or the swimming pool.&amp;nbsp; Anywhere where I can feel unconfined and free of the environment
where I do most of my other thinking and working.&amp;nbsp; Personally, I think it’s tough
to do “new” thinking when you’re surrounded by “old” environments.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Take a pad and brainstorm all the things Steve might do to try and achieve his goal.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
Don’t censor yourself as you write… simply let as many ideas as possible flow from
your brain to your pencil and onto the paper.&amp;nbsp; Never let your pencil stop moving.&amp;nbsp;
Even if you’re scribbling lame, ridiculous ideas… let them come.&amp;nbsp; A strong premise—whether
comedy or drama—should generate a nearly infinite number of ideas. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just looking at the above Steve/comic book shop example, I’m gonna do a quick brainstorming
session.&amp;nbsp; Here we go, right off the top of my head…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WAYS STEVE MIGHT TRY TO GET FIRED/LAID OFF&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Never turn in any work&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Show up late&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Sleep with the boss’s wife&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Sleep with the boss’s daughter&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Dress like a clown&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Fart wherever he goes&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Eat lunch without a fork or spoon—just put his face right in the plate&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Only communicate by singing&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Hop everywhere he goes&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Call his co-workers names&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Pee himself constantly&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Wear his clothes backwards&lt;br&gt;
•&amp;nbsp; Start selling off the office equipment&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, I’m not saying any of those or good, funny, or even helpful idea.&amp;nbsp; What
I AM saying is this: I typed those in about 30 seconds of spur-of-the-moment thinking.&amp;nbsp;
If you were to spend even just an hour doing this, you’d have HUNDREDS of ideas.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Your job is then to pick the best of those (and by “best,” I mean those that are the
most true and honest to Steve’s character, his want, and the world of the story—not
those that you most want to happen), and begin to think about what would logically
happen if they were to happen. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For instance, if Steve started communicating only by singing, he’d probably annoy
and anger a lot of people… at first.&amp;nbsp; But then maybe people would grow to like
his singing—maybe it’s a cheerful break in an otherwise dreary workplace—and the office
would institute musical Fridays, allowing people to play CD’s and listen to radios.&amp;nbsp;
So Steve would need to think of a new tactic.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps he tries to sleep with
his boss’s wife… only to discover that his boss and his wife have an open marriage,
and his boss wants to join them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Again—I’m not saying ANY of these ideas are right for the story you want to tell.&amp;nbsp;
I’m simply trying to concoct examples that are on-point for Steve’s objective and
have a cause-effect relationship that seems believable… in both our world and your
story-world.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, Matt—like I said earlier, I think you have a strong comic premise and a character
with a great want; my sense is that you simply got sidetracked by subplots and story
elements that seemed interesting, but weren’t necessarily integral to your main story.&amp;nbsp;
I even think that as you go back and reconstruct your story, focusing on your A-story,
you’ll see how the B-story (the Alice love story) can integrate itself more organically
without derailing everything else.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I hope this is helpful info… good luck with project, and lemme know how it goes!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For the rest of you, if you have loglines or summaries you’d like to submit to the &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;Script
Notes Pitch Workshop&lt;/a&gt;, feel free to email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com, or simply
post them in a “comments section” here on the blog.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the mean time, we’ve got some great stuff coming up… more Pitch Workshop submissions,
book reviews, some great website recommendations, and more questions from readers!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Have a good Sunday!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,84f829b4-4c23-4198-a542-6e8e899a37a1.aspx</comments>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Today's submission to the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"><b>Script
Notes Pitch Workshop</b></a> comes from Matt in Montreal, who is looking for feedback
on his synopsis for his feature idea, Downsize This! (although he's not married to
the title).  He also says:<br /><i><br />
"I'm aiming for a <b>Jim Carrey</b> inspired, farout main Protagonist, contrasted
with an even wilder love interest, populated with supporting characters with their
own selfish designs...<br /><br />
I'm happy with what I have here, but if you could offer me any specific guidance with
how to improve the above synopsis, I would greatly appreciate it."</i><br /><br />
So please... take a look and post your constructive criticism in the comments section
below!  Here's Matt's synopsis... and thanks for submitting, Matt!...<br /><br /><br /><i><b>Title</b>: Downsize This!<br /><b>Genre</b>: Romantic Comedy<br /><br />
"Love in the Time of Downsizing"<br /><br />
Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for
self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with
an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in
6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish
- and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted. 
<br /><br />
But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric,
alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing;
he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence -
that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate
future within the company. 
<br /><br />
It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that
he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident;
a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face
during these tough economic times. 
<br /><br />
Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling
his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his
professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance
prize.<br /><br />
In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really
worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?</i><br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b" />
      </body>
      <title>PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 5</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+5.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Today's submission to the &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Script
Notes Pitch Workshop&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes from Matt in Montreal, who is looking for feedback
on his synopsis for his feature idea, Downsize This! (although he's not married to
the title).&amp;nbsp; He also says:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"I'm aiming for a &lt;b&gt;Jim Carrey&lt;/b&gt; inspired, farout main Protagonist, contrasted
with an even wilder love interest, populated with supporting characters with their
own selfish designs...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm happy with what I have here, but if you could offer me any specific guidance with
how to improve the above synopsis, I would greatly appreciate it."&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So please... take a look and post your constructive criticism in the comments section
below!&amp;nbsp; Here's Matt's synopsis... and thanks for submitting, Matt!...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Title&lt;/b&gt;: Downsize This!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Genre&lt;/b&gt;: Romantic Comedy&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Love in the Time of Downsizing"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for
self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with
an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in
6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish
- and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric,
alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing;
he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence -
that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate
future within the company. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that
he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident;
a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face
during these tough economic times. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling
his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his
professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance
prize.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really
worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,e1b098ea-b621-4a8a-a3a4-d532d669fd0b.aspx</comments>
      <category>Pitching</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>Hey, everyone—<br /><br />
Today’s submission to the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"><b>Script
Notes Pitch Workshop</b></a> comes from <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,33bfbf2a-93a9-44f1-a479-6a72c23cc21f.aspx"><b>Scott</b></a>,
who submits loglines for two feature ideas.  So before we dive in… <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,33bfbf2a-93a9-44f1-a479-6a72c23cc21f.aspx">Scott</a>—thank
you so much for sending these!  The Pitch Workshop is one of my favorite parts
of doing this blog, and I always wish people would use it more.  So A) I really
appreciate you submitting, and B) I hope this feedback—and the feedback you get from
other readers—is helpful as you develop these ideas!<br /><br />
Having said that, let’s get started!  Here are Scott’s loglines…<br /><br />
1) <i><b>THE SPITCHCOCKS</b></i>, a feature comedy, is about four friends who form
a famous rock band who implode in the most spectacular way. Now they must reunite
for the biggest gig of their life.<br /><br />
2) <i><b>THE DEVIL'S MONEY</b></i>, a feature crime drama, is about corrupt Mexican
police forces who battle during the search for a kidnapped teenager.<br /><br /><br />
Now, normally, I like to look at different ideas separately, but today I want to look
at these together, because I think they both have very similar strengths and weaknesses.<br /><br /><b>STRENGTHS</b>:<br />
One of the best things about both ideas is their strong sense of the “kind of movie”
they want to be.  While each is just a logline with few details, I get a definite
feel for each film… it’s like I can see snippets of each movie or their trailers…
and I also get the sense that Scott, the writer, see much more of the canvas on which
these stories are painted.  And that’s a great place for Scott to start from.<br /><br /><br /><b>WEAKNESSES</b>:<br />
Firstly, Scott-- while both these ideas have great “backdrops,” I’m not sure what
the actual STORIES are.  Story comes from a main character (or characters) having
an incredibly strong WANT that forces him to take ACTION… and that action places him
in conflict with OBSTACLES he must conquer or navigate.  And unfortunately, neither
logline details a main character(s), what he/she wants, specific courses of action,
or any tangible obstacles the hero might encounter.<br /><br />
Secondly—or maybe hand in hand—the loglines—while good at conveying a “sense of spirit”—are
written in such broad generics (“the most spectacular way,” “the biggest gig of their
life”) that while I believe YOU have a strong sense of these worlds, it’s tough for
me to share in it.  I see MY version of “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig
of their life,” but I’m not really sure if my own imagination’s versions are accurate
to your vision and story.  And your job, as a writer, is to communicate your
own specific vision, not necessarily entice me with what MY vision could be.<br /><br /><br />
So...<br /><br /><b>SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THESE</b>:<br /><br />
1)  <b>IDENTIFY YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS</b>.  Does <i>The Spitchcocks</i> revolve
around Larry, the band’s former lead singer, who wants to help his bandmates heal
their animosity so they can reunite for one last enormous gig?  Is it about the
drummer, Razor, who wants the band to play a charity concert to raise money for his
baby’s life-saving surgery?  Or is it a straight-up ensemble piece… in which
you identify the main characters as a unit?  For instance, are they now mid-forties,
middle class suburban parents who must suddenly juggle day-jobs and parenting as they
attempt to get in shape for a new tour?  Or are they poor late-twenties singles
who broke up after a violent falling out?  Are they Midwestern bumpkins who somehow
succeeded as a rap band—The Tractor Pulls—in the big city?  Or are they former
hair metal rockers now out of place in a hip-hop world?  <br /><br />
Paint a picture of these guys so we can not only see them visually, but we “see” them
emotionally and understand how the world looks to them.<br /><br />
The same goes for <i>The Devil’s Money</i>.  Does this story follow one particular
cop, like Eric, a righteous cop trying to find a missing child amidst a city run by
corruption?  Does it follow Charlie, the kidnapped kid’s father, desperately
trying to work with corrupt officials to rescue his son?  Or is it an ensemble
piece about District Battalion 89, the most corrupt police force in <b>Mexico City</b>,
that must pull together to save this one particular kid?<br /><br />
Whether the story follows one person or a group, giving them a name and a few words
of description will help us connect to them.<br /><br /><br />
2)  <b>WHAT DOES THIS MAIN CHARACTER WANT?</b>  I hinted at this above—and
specifying his want will also help flesh out your main character—but let us know exactly
what your protagonist wants… both “tangibly” and “emotionally.”  Perhaps Norman,
your main character in <i>The Spitchcocks</i>, wants to reunite his band so he can
win the heart of his true love… a girl who used to be the world’s biggest Spitchcocks
fan.  That may not be the story you want to tell, but it DOES give a sense of
what Norman wants “tangibly”—A) a girl, and B) to reunite the band—and it lets us
know what he wants “emotionally”… true love.  We understand how this onjective
will drive Norman to action… and, because it has an emotional engine (we all understand
the desire for true love), it allows us to invest emotionally in Norman’s quest.<br /><br />
Similarly, in <i>The Devil’s Money</i>, does your main character simply want to find
the missing kid?  Or is your main character Carlos, a police chief who wants
to rid his force of corruption… and their newest case—the missing kid—is the one he’s
determined to use to rid his force of evil?  Or is your main character Jules,
the kid who’s been kidnapped, and he desperately wants to be rescued… but learns the
corrupt police force itself is behind his capture?<br /><br />
Whatever you decide for each story, knowing—and articulating—your characters’ wants
is the engine that drives the narrative.  Put it up front, big and bold, in both
your logline and your actual script.  Without it, the rest of your script is
much less effective; but let your audience understand and relate to your hero’s want,
and you’ve already taken a huge step toward constructing a successful story.<br /><br /><br />
3)  <b>SPECIFY THE EXACT ACTIONS YOUR MAIN CHARACTER(S) MUST TAKE TO ACCOMPLISH
HIS/HER WANT.</b>  <i>The Spitchcocks</i>, for instance, is about a band reuniting…
so what tangible actions must be taken for this to succeed?  Do the band members
live in different countries, so Hank, the frontman, but physically travel the globe
in order to gather them all?  Is the lead singer in jail for pot possession…
so your lead character—Toby, the bassist—must break him out and get him to the gig
before he’s re-arrested?<br /><br />
In <i>The Devil’s Money</i>, you mention that corrupt cops are searching for a kidnapped
kid… and there’s also a war between cops.  While I’m not sure which is your “A-story,”
I think this will clear up when you pinpoint your main character’s want.  If
the objective is to find the kid, what actions does this entail?  Do they have
five internal suspects the main cop, Pepe, must interview, opening a world of corruption
and scandal in Pepe’s own department?  Or must Pepe and his partner, Ricky, search
for the missing child in Mexico’s dangerous and seedy underworld, which is more (or
less) corrupt than the police force itself?<br /><br /><br />
4)  <b>WHAT IS YOUR HERO’S MAIN OBSTACLE?</b>  Like identifying your characters’
wants and actions, we also need to know exactly what is preventing your main character(s)
from succeeding.  Why can’t The Spitchcocks simply reunite?  Even if they
now live on different continents, why can’t they just hop on a plane and get back
together?  What is preventing their actions from accomplishing their goal? 
Did the Spitchcocks break up over soapy and unresolved sexual/romantic tensions? 
Do they have different artistic visions that constantly cause them to fight? 
Does one of them have amnesia that has wiped his memory of all the songs?  <br /><br />
Likewise, how does a battle between corrupt cops interfere with them finding a missing
kid?  Are the cops lazy and refuse to work?  Is this the child of an enemy
faction’s chief, so the other cops refuse to look for him/her?  Do they not want
to find this child because he possesses valuable information that could reveal and
punish certain corrupt cops?<br /><br />
Whatever you decide, your obstacle needs to be large and dramatic enough that we immediately
understand how it will impede our hero’s journey.  Like your character’s want,
the best obstacles aren’t just “tangible” obstacles, they’re also are also “emotional”
obstacles, forcing the character to confront something in his/her relationships with
other people.  <br /><br />
For example, the reuniting Spitchcocks could be faced with the obstacle that they
all live on different continents.  This is, obviously, a huge challenge to their
reunion.  But it’s a STRONGER challenge if they live on those different continents
because ten years ago, when they were together as a band, the lead singer, Jorge,
married the drummer, Carrie, and had an affair with the bassist, Vince.<br /><br />
Lastly, Scott…<br /><br /><br />
5)  <b>AVOID WRITING IN GENERICS LIKE “MOST SPECTACULAR WAY” AND “BIGGEST GIG
OF THEIR LIFE.”</b>  Although loglines must use words sparingly, they must also
be the right words to communicate your story accurately and with detail.  “Biggest
gig of their life” may mean one thing to one reader… and an entirely different thing
to another reader.  And what’s most important is that your reader understands
what those moments mean to YOU.<br /><br />
Having said that, it doesn’t matter exactly what the Spitchcocks’ “biggest gig” is…
or how “spectacularly” the Spitchcocks implode… as long as it’s the biggest “EMOTIONAL”
gig of their life and the most “EMOTIONALLY” spectacular implosion they could have.
 <br /><br />
For example, you could argue that the “biggest gig of their life” is that they’ve
been invited to open for <b>U2</b> for ONE NIGHT ONLY (the normal opener is out sick),
and if it goes well, it could re-launch their career.  This could obviously be
“the biggest gig of their life.”  <br /><br />
OR… “the biggest gig of their life” could be this: the lead singer Barry’s daughter
is dying, and Barry doesn’t have the money for her surgery… so he reunites the band
for a charity concert to raise $500,000 and save his child’s life.  This could
also be the “biggest gig of his life.”  And—frankly—it may even be “bigger,”
because the stakes are higher.<br /><br />
OR… perhaps <i>The Spitchcocks</i> is a wonky sci-fi comedy, and the band has been
kidnapped by an alien race that tells them: “You have 24 hours to put together a concert
of entirely new material… or we’ll destroy the planet Earth.”  Silly, I know—but
with the right tone it could work… and THAT is certainly the “biggest gig of their
life.”<br /><br />
What this basically boils down to, Scott, is your story’s <b>STAKES</b> (what your
characters stand to lose if they fail in their quests)… and deciding/understanding
what they are.  Once you know that, those are the specifics to plug into the
vague holes left by “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life.”<br /><br /><br />
Anyway, Scott, I hope this is helpful!  Feel free to play, shape, mold, rework,
tweak, polish… and resubmit.  <br /><br />
In the mean time, if other readers have loglines or summaries for the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx">Script
Notes Pitch Workshop</a>, feel free to post them here, or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.<br /><br />
In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great posts coming up.  We’ll have
more <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx">Pitch
Workshop</a> submissions… we’ll talk about how to protect your work… we'll help the <i><b>American
Idol</b></i> writers earn fair pay, residuals, and health benefits… we'll have book
reviews… and much, much more!<br /><br /><p></p></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c" />
      </body>
      <title>PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 4</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PITCH+WORKSHOP+ENTRY+4.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hey, everyone—&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Today’s submission to the &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Script
Notes Pitch Workshop&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes from &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,33bfbf2a-93a9-44f1-a479-6a72c23cc21f.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Scott&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
who submits loglines for two feature ideas.&amp;nbsp; So before we dive in… &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,33bfbf2a-93a9-44f1-a479-6a72c23cc21f.aspx"&gt;Scott&lt;/a&gt;—thank
you so much for sending these!&amp;nbsp; The Pitch Workshop is one of my favorite parts
of doing this blog, and I always wish people would use it more.&amp;nbsp; So A) I really
appreciate you submitting, and B) I hope this feedback—and the feedback you get from
other readers—is helpful as you develop these ideas!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having said that, let’s get started!&amp;nbsp; Here are Scott’s loglines…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1) &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;THE SPITCHCOCKS&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, a feature comedy, is about four friends who form
a famous rock band who implode in the most spectacular way. Now they must reunite
for the biggest gig of their life.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;THE DEVIL'S MONEY&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, a feature crime drama, is about corrupt Mexican
police forces who battle during the search for a kidnapped teenager.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, normally, I like to look at different ideas separately, but today I want to look
at these together, because I think they both have very similar strengths and weaknesses.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;STRENGTHS&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
One of the best things about both ideas is their strong sense of the “kind of movie”
they want to be.&amp;nbsp; While each is just a logline with few details, I get a definite
feel for each film… it’s like I can see snippets of each movie or their trailers…
and I also get the sense that Scott, the writer, see much more of the canvas on which
these stories are painted.&amp;nbsp; And that’s a great place for Scott to start from.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;WEAKNESSES&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
Firstly, Scott-- while both these ideas have great “backdrops,” I’m not sure what
the actual STORIES are.&amp;nbsp; Story comes from a main character (or characters) having
an incredibly strong WANT that forces him to take ACTION… and that action places him
in conflict with OBSTACLES he must conquer or navigate.&amp;nbsp; And unfortunately, neither
logline details a main character(s), what he/she wants, specific courses of action,
or any tangible obstacles the hero might encounter.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Secondly—or maybe hand in hand—the loglines—while good at conveying a “sense of spirit”—are
written in such broad generics (“the most spectacular way,” “the biggest gig of their
life”) that while I believe YOU have a strong sense of these worlds, it’s tough for
me to share in it.&amp;nbsp; I see MY version of “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig
of their life,” but I’m not really sure if my own imagination’s versions are accurate
to your vision and story.&amp;nbsp; And your job, as a writer, is to communicate your
own specific vision, not necessarily entice me with what MY vision could be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THESE&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1)&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;IDENTIFY YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Does &lt;i&gt;The Spitchcocks&lt;/i&gt; revolve
around Larry, the band’s former lead singer, who wants to help his bandmates heal
their animosity so they can reunite for one last enormous gig?&amp;nbsp; Is it about the
drummer, Razor, who wants the band to play a charity concert to raise money for his
baby’s life-saving surgery?&amp;nbsp; Or is it a straight-up ensemble piece… in which
you identify the main characters as a unit?&amp;nbsp; For instance, are they now mid-forties,
middle class suburban parents who must suddenly juggle day-jobs and parenting as they
attempt to get in shape for a new tour?&amp;nbsp; Or are they poor late-twenties singles
who broke up after a violent falling out?&amp;nbsp; Are they Midwestern bumpkins who somehow
succeeded as a rap band—The Tractor Pulls—in the big city?&amp;nbsp; Or are they former
hair metal rockers now out of place in a hip-hop world? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Paint a picture of these guys so we can not only see them visually, but we “see” them
emotionally and understand how the world looks to them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The same goes for &lt;i&gt;The Devil’s Money&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Does this story follow one particular
cop, like Eric, a righteous cop trying to find a missing child amidst a city run by
corruption?&amp;nbsp; Does it follow Charlie, the kidnapped kid’s father, desperately
trying to work with corrupt officials to rescue his son?&amp;nbsp; Or is it an ensemble
piece about District Battalion 89, the most corrupt police force in &lt;b&gt;Mexico City&lt;/b&gt;,
that must pull together to save this one particular kid?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Whether the story follows one person or a group, giving them a name and a few words
of description will help us connect to them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2)&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;WHAT DOES THIS MAIN CHARACTER WANT?&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; I hinted at this above—and
specifying his want will also help flesh out your main character—but let us know exactly
what your protagonist wants… both “tangibly” and “emotionally.”&amp;nbsp; Perhaps Norman,
your main character in &lt;i&gt;The Spitchcocks&lt;/i&gt;, wants to reunite his band so he can
win the heart of his true love… a girl who used to be the world’s biggest Spitchcocks
fan.&amp;nbsp; That may not be the story you want to tell, but it DOES give a sense of
what Norman wants “tangibly”—A) a girl, and B) to reunite the band—and it lets us
know what he wants “emotionally”… true love.&amp;nbsp; We understand how this onjective
will drive Norman to action… and, because it has an emotional engine (we all understand
the desire for true love), it allows us to invest emotionally in Norman’s quest.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Similarly, in &lt;i&gt;The Devil’s Money&lt;/i&gt;, does your main character simply want to find
the missing kid?&amp;nbsp; Or is your main character Carlos, a police chief who wants
to rid his force of corruption… and their newest case—the missing kid—is the one he’s
determined to use to rid his force of evil?&amp;nbsp; Or is your main character Jules,
the kid who’s been kidnapped, and he desperately wants to be rescued… but learns the
corrupt police force itself is behind his capture?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Whatever you decide for each story, knowing—and articulating—your characters’ wants
is the engine that drives the narrative.&amp;nbsp; Put it up front, big and bold, in both
your logline and your actual script.&amp;nbsp; Without it, the rest of your script is
much less effective; but let your audience understand and relate to your hero’s want,
and you’ve already taken a huge step toward constructing a successful story.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3)&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;SPECIFY THE EXACT ACTIONS YOUR MAIN CHARACTER(S) MUST TAKE TO ACCOMPLISH
HIS/HER WANT.&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;The Spitchcocks&lt;/i&gt;, for instance, is about a band reuniting…
so what tangible actions must be taken for this to succeed?&amp;nbsp; Do the band members
live in different countries, so Hank, the frontman, but physically travel the globe
in order to gather them all?&amp;nbsp; Is the lead singer in jail for pot possession…
so your lead character—Toby, the bassist—must break him out and get him to the gig
before he’s re-arrested?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In &lt;i&gt;The Devil’s Money&lt;/i&gt;, you mention that corrupt cops are searching for a kidnapped
kid… and there’s also a war between cops.&amp;nbsp; While I’m not sure which is your “A-story,”
I think this will clear up when you pinpoint your main character’s want.&amp;nbsp; If
the objective is to find the kid, what actions does this entail?&amp;nbsp; Do they have
five internal suspects the main cop, Pepe, must interview, opening a world of corruption
and scandal in Pepe’s own department?&amp;nbsp; Or must Pepe and his partner, Ricky, search
for the missing child in Mexico’s dangerous and seedy underworld, which is more (or
less) corrupt than the police force itself?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
4)&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;WHAT IS YOUR HERO’S MAIN OBSTACLE?&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Like identifying your characters’
wants and actions, we also need to know exactly what is preventing your main character(s)
from succeeding.&amp;nbsp; Why can’t The Spitchcocks simply reunite?&amp;nbsp; Even if they
now live on different continents, why can’t they just hop on a plane and get back
together?&amp;nbsp; What is preventing their actions from accomplishing their goal?&amp;nbsp;
Did the Spitchcocks break up over soapy and unresolved sexual/romantic tensions?&amp;nbsp;
Do they have different artistic visions that constantly cause them to fight?&amp;nbsp;
Does one of them have amnesia that has wiped his memory of all the songs? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Likewise, how does a battle between corrupt cops interfere with them finding a missing
kid?&amp;nbsp; Are the cops lazy and refuse to work?&amp;nbsp; Is this the child of an enemy
faction’s chief, so the other cops refuse to look for him/her?&amp;nbsp; Do they not want
to find this child because he possesses valuable information that could reveal and
punish certain corrupt cops?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Whatever you decide, your obstacle needs to be large and dramatic enough that we immediately
understand how it will impede our hero’s journey.&amp;nbsp; Like your character’s want,
the best obstacles aren’t just “tangible” obstacles, they’re also are also “emotional”
obstacles, forcing the character to confront something in his/her relationships with
other people. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For example, the reuniting Spitchcocks could be faced with the obstacle that they
all live on different continents.&amp;nbsp; This is, obviously, a huge challenge to their
reunion.&amp;nbsp; But it’s a STRONGER challenge if they live on those different continents
because ten years ago, when they were together as a band, the lead singer, Jorge,
married the drummer, Carrie, and had an affair with the bassist, Vince.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Lastly, Scott…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
5)&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;AVOID WRITING IN GENERICS LIKE “MOST SPECTACULAR WAY” AND “BIGGEST GIG
OF THEIR LIFE.”&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Although loglines must use words sparingly, they must also
be the right words to communicate your story accurately and with detail.&amp;nbsp; “Biggest
gig of their life” may mean one thing to one reader… and an entirely different thing
to another reader.&amp;nbsp; And what’s most important is that your reader understands
what those moments mean to YOU.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having said that, it doesn’t matter exactly what the Spitchcocks’ “biggest gig” is…
or how “spectacularly” the Spitchcocks implode… as long as it’s the biggest “EMOTIONAL”
gig of their life and the most “EMOTIONALLY” spectacular implosion they could have.
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For example, you could argue that the “biggest gig of their life” is that they’ve
been invited to open for &lt;b&gt;U2&lt;/b&gt; for ONE NIGHT ONLY (the normal opener is out sick),
and if it goes well, it could re-launch their career.&amp;nbsp; This could obviously be
“the biggest gig of their life.” &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OR… “the biggest gig of their life” could be this: the lead singer Barry’s daughter
is dying, and Barry doesn’t have the money for her surgery… so he reunites the band
for a charity concert to raise $500,000 and save his child’s life.&amp;nbsp; This could
also be the “biggest gig of his life.”&amp;nbsp; And—frankly—it may even be “bigger,”
because the stakes are higher.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OR… perhaps &lt;i&gt;The Spitchcocks&lt;/i&gt; is a wonky sci-fi comedy, and the band has been
kidnapped by an alien race that tells them: “You have 24 hours to put together a concert
of entirely new material… or we’ll destroy the planet Earth.”&amp;nbsp; Silly, I know—but
with the right tone it could work… and THAT is certainly the “biggest gig of their
life.”&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What this basically boils down to, Scott, is your story’s &lt;b&gt;STAKES&lt;/b&gt; (what your
characters stand to lose if they fail in their quests)… and deciding/understanding
what they are.&amp;nbsp; Once you know that, those are the specifics to plug into the
vague holes left by “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life.”&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, Scott, I hope this is helpful!&amp;nbsp; Feel free to play, shape, mold, rework,
tweak, polish… and resubmit. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the mean time, if other readers have loglines or summaries for the &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;Script
Notes Pitch Workshop&lt;/a&gt;, feel free to post them here, or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great posts coming up.&amp;nbsp; We’ll have
more &lt;a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CategoryView,category,SCRIPT%20NOTES%20PITCH%20WORKSHOP.aspx"&gt;Pitch
Workshop&lt;/a&gt; submissions… we’ll talk about how to protect your work… we'll help the &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;American
Idol&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; writers earn fair pay, residuals, and health benefits… we'll have book
reviews… and much, much more!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,a50a3115-514b-4757-94e4-a47da68c7c1c.aspx</comments>
      <category>Pitching</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP</category>
      <category>Writing Advice</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>Hey, screenwriters--<br /><br />
I'm excited to present a special guest today... <a href="http://www.willakers.com/"><b>William
M. Akers</b></a>, author of the new screenwriting book, <a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"><i><b>Your
Screenplay Sucks! 100 Ways To Make It Great</b></i></a>, from <a href="http://shop.mwp.com/"><b>Michael
Wiese Productions</b></a>, and... my former screenwriting teacher at <a href="http://www.vanderbilt.edu/"><b>Vanderbilt
University</b></a>!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.willakers.com/">Will</a> was not only a great teacher (and my
first screenwriting professor ever), but he's written movies and television for virtually
every major network and studio from MGM and Disney to FOX, NBC, and ABC.  He's
currently writing a movie for Overture Films which is being directed by Jon Amiel. 
This is his first book... and he's done an incredible job.  
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"><i>Your Screenplay Sucks!</i></a> is
a terrific first outing, not only because it's packed with great info, tips, and insight,
but because it has a wonderfully unique approach to working on your script. 
First of all, it's a great book to read if you've never written a screenplay and want
some terrific first-time-out pointers and help.  But more importantly and uniquely...
this is a great book to read if you've already learned-- or are in the process of
learning-- how to do it, and want to make sure your script is as good as it can possibly
be.<br /><br />
Basically, <a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"><i>Your Screenplay Sucks!</i></a> is
a comprehensive checklist of the 100 things screenwriters almost NEVER do... but should. 
It pinpoints specific mistakes writers make-- such as "you don't have a killer first
page" or "you haven't buried exposition like Jimmy Hoffa" or "you call shots"-- which
makes it easy to focus in on specific aspects of your script and punch them up. 
And because it's in checklist form, you can just go down the list, looking at and
improving each aspect until you've whipped your screenplay into shape.<br /><br />
Also, this book doesn't use kid gloves.  It doesn't coddle you and give you warm-your-heart
artistic advice like "listen to your heart" or "find the hidden writer within." 
This book is designed to pummel mistakes out of your script until it's better. 
It has sections like "you didn't run your spellcheck, you moron!" and "you blew your
first ten pages! Arggggghhhhh!" and "you think your script is special and rules don't
apply."  Many of the mistakes are mistakes screenwriters at all levels continue
to make.  As such, it doesn't pull punches... it ribs you, goads you, and takes
your script to task until its better (which, even in and of itself, is a great lesson
in writing with "voice").  
<br /><br />
So do yourself a favor... head to your nearest bookstore, or click <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Screenplay-Sucks-Ways-Great/dp/1932907459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1219508299&amp;sr=8-1"><b>HERE</b></a> to
go to Amazon, and grab yourself a copy of <a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"><i>Your
Screenplay Sucks!</i></a>  But first... check out the interview I did this week
with <a href="http://www.willakers.com/">Will</a>... you'll learn a bit more about
him, the book, and writing in general...<br /><br /><br /><b>Will... you have a unique career, because you write and teach… and you do both
far from the madding crowds of Hollywood.  So let’s begin by learning your path. 
Tell me how you started writing professionally… and how you got to where you are today.</b><br /><br />
When I was in the third grade, my teacher would read to us after lunch.  My favorite
book was <i><b>The Wolves of Willoughby Chase</b></i>, an English adventure with wolves,
sleighs in the snow, and little girls and a wicked governess who kills their parents
for their money.  After I got out of USC grad school, I knew I wanted to write,
so I looked at things that had been eating at me for a long time, (which make the
best subjects for screenplays, btw) and I had never forgotten the book that had been
read to me as a child.  I ended up optioning it.  Nine months later, I had
a screenplay.  It was produced by Zenith Productions in London.  It found
a home on the Disney Channel and I was nominated for a CableAce.  Actually, that
wasn’t my first professional gig.  Haven’t thought of this in a while. 
When I was still at USC, I was sitting outside the chairman’s office telling stories
to his assistant and he came out of his office, pointed at me and said, “Are you a
writer?”  I said, “Sure.”  He said, “Come in my office.”  He didn’t
know my name.  Someone had called, a manager for child actors, and wanted USC’s
best writing student to write a screenplay for one of his clients.  The chairman
told him he had just the writer in mind, opened his door, and saw me.  I got
paid $1,500 dollars.  Needless to say, the movie never got made.  I love
the idea that this manager thought the chairman went through some involved search
to get to me, their “best writing student” and he didn’t even know my name. 
Easiest way I ever got a job.  
<br /><br />
After the first job, I had to get the next one.  I’ve always had an agent in
Los Angeles, and if you live out of town, it helps.  But, you can’t sit around
waiting for your agent to land you a job.  You have to go out and beat the bushes. 
I’ve sold pitches, sold spec scripts, and been hired on assignment.  Every year
is different.  Some years, I haven’t worked at all.  It helps to have no
credit card debt and as small a house note as possible!  Even when I’m not getting
paid to write, I’m still writing spec material.  I tend to write every day, so
after a while, that’s a lot of pages.  It’s been a hodgepodge of trying to get
work, and failing, and wasting time, and being lucky, and writing and writing and
writing.  Sometimes it works and most times it doesn’t.  The key is that
you have to enjoy it even when it’s not working.<br /><br />
Right now, I’m rewriting a spec I sold.  Done eleven drafts for the producers
in nearly two years.  The script is about the fall of Saigon.  Jon Amiel
is directing it, and, under his aegis, the script has only gotten better.  “Development
paradise” is not a phrase you often hear, but it applies to this one.  I just
sold a pitch about a cop in London, based on a true story, and am waiting for the
contracts to be negotiated before I start work.  So there is a bit of activity
here and there... 
<br /><br /><br /><b>You’ve written and sold numerous screenplays, and now you’ve published a book about
screenwriting.  One of the things that makes this book unique is its approach
and tone.  It’s not a how-to book for beginners trying their first screenplay;
it’s an in-your-face pummeling for people who have written a few scripts and want
to whip them into shape.  It doesn’t pull punches or wear kiddie gloves; it’s
a brutally honest assessment of the 100 biggest mistakes you see in beginners’ screenplays. 
So what compelled you, when you already have a successful screenwriting career, to
write this book?  And how did you decide on its unique voice and checklist format?</b><br /><br />
First of all, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Screenplay-Sucks-Ways-Great/dp/1932907459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1219508299&amp;sr=8-1"><i>Your
Screenplay Sucks!</i></a> is aimed at both beginning and more experienced writers. 
There’s a lot in there about generating an idea and how to develop characters and
especially what I call “physical writing” -- how to write a clean sentence that actually
tells the reader what you think it means... That’s useful to a writer just starting
her first script, and you don’t often see it covered in books.  As for experienced
writers, I’ve heard from people who’ve been selling material for twenty years who
said the book reminded them of stuff they had forgotten they were supposed to be doing. 
Anybody who is contemplating starting a script, or rewriting one, can benefit. 
So much for the commercial plug.  
<br /><br />
As to where it came from, I wrote it in self defense.  I’ve been critiquing screenplays
for a long time, and I found that beginning writers all make the same mistakes. 
Over and over and over and over.  So, I thought to create a checklist so the
writer could do all this boilerplate stuff I had to tell every client about, and then
send me their script so I could hammer them on structure and character instead of
“don’t have character names that rhyme,” “take out thes and thats,” “make your prose
crystal clear,” and “beware of research...”  The book’s voice is my voice. 
I dictated the first draft of the book, so it’s a breezy read and, for a screenwriting
book, pretty funny.<br /><br /><br /><b>How did the process of writing a book differ from the process of writing a screenplay? 
What surprised you about the differences in writing a book?</b><br /><br />
I wrote a table of contents and a few chapters, sent it to the publisher, and they
said “Go for it.” Once I knew it was going to be published, it was a complete blast
to write.  Like writing a movie, I suppose, where you know the producer has a
put deal.  Not that that’s ever happened to me... I basically wrote it for myself
and had fun.  I put in there whatever the hell I thought would be helpful, and
that’s what came out the other end.  No development hell.  I rewrote it
a lot, but what’s there is what I wanted.  A lot easier than writing a screenplay,
that’s for sure.  What surprised me is how much fun I had writing it.<br /><br /><b><br />
Now that you’ve finished the book and returned to screenwriting, how has going through
the book-writing process helped your screenwriting chops and process?  Or has
it?</b><br /><br />
Interesting question.  Act III of the book is about selling your screenplay and
dealing with producers and Hollywood, and I have found myself trying to take my own
advice.  Weird, huh?  All the painstaking work I did on the rewriting section
of the book has helped my first drafts.  There is so much in the book about being
clear and concise, that writing it rubbed off on my own work.   
<br /><br /><br /><b>You’ve done what few people are able to do… maintain a successful screenwriting
career while living far from the heart of Los Angeles.  How do you do this? 
What advice do you have for screenwriters and aspirants who don’t live—or can’t get
to—Los Angeles?</b><br /><br />
Horrible question.  Do you actually want the truth?  It’s a bitch-willy
to write and not live in L.A..  I lived there three years as a grad student in
film school.  Then three more years getting my career going.  I’m still
dining off those six years of living in Los Angeles full time.  For six more
years after that, I kept an apartment in West Hollywood and commuted regularly until
my sharp-fanged, drooling landlord figured out a way to throw me out.  So, I
did put in my time in L.A.  Living someplace else, lobbing scripts at Los Angeles,
hoping someone will notice is, if you want my opinion, a fool’s paradise.  You
don’t want to confuse hope with denial.  You can win a contest and get discovered,
but that’s not easy.  Every agent I’ve ever had came because a friend held a
gun to their head, handed them a script and said, “Read this.  This guy walks
on water.”  I never had a single query letter answered.  Not one.  
<br /><br />
Okay, so much for the depressing part... Now for the advice.  Figure out a way
to get to Los Angeles, regularly. Find people who live there who you can meet. 
Facebook.  Network.  Lie.  Use the internet.  Use the Creative
Directory.  Talk to 18 year old kids about how to do it.  Take a marketing
person to lunch and squeeze them dry for free.  Get out there somehow. 
Or, get your material out there.  
<br /><br />
Of course, the single best (and essential) thing you can do is to write a great screenplay. 
Not a good one, either, mind you.  There’re lots of them all over.  In gutters. 
Being used to clean windshields at gas stations.  L.A. is lousy with good scripts. 
Any jackass can write a good screenplay.  But, keep in mind, they’re not interested
in good scripts, only great ones.  So write a great one.  If it takes you
three years, so be it.  If your script is great, people will pass your material
on to someone they know because it makes them look good.  Great material will
open doors.  
<br /><br />
Remember, that if you ever do meet someone “real” who is in a position to pass your
script on to someone else, your script has to be bulletproof.  You will only
get one read.  If it’s not fantastic, they will never read anything from you
again.  You have to make it perfect.  Hence the crying need for writers
to buy my book or hire me to crit their script before it’s too late!  
<br /><br /><br /><b>You teach college students, so you’re often working with young writers just starting
to experiment with screenwriting and storytelling.  What are the top three mistakes
you see beginning writers make?</b><br /><br />
They don’t have a breathtakingly original, wildly creative, non-derivative idea. 
They put the backstory in the first act.  They don’t take the time to pare down
the scene description and dialogue to the bare stark-white bones.  They have
character names that rhyme or start with the same letter.  Their bad guy is poorly
constructed.  They don’t separate out the characters’s voices.  They didn’t
throw out the first twenty pages.  They don’t have a clue how the motion picture
or television business operates.  They are arrogant and think the rules don’t
apply.  They argue when you give them notes.  They don’t keep the reader
in mind when they are writing.  Those’re probably the top three mistakes. 
<br /><br /><br /><b><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Screenplay-Sucks-Ways-Great/dp/1932907459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1219508299&amp;sr=8-1"><i>Your
Screenplay Sucks!</i></a> details 100 mistakes you see aspiring screenwriters make
in their projects.  But what are the biggest mistakes you’ve made… both in your
actual writing and your career… and what have you learned from them?</b><br /><br />
Biggest mistake I ever made was when a producer wanted to make a script of mine and
I told him... “No.”  The script was autobiographical and I wanted to direct it
myself.  Idiot.  The instant I said I was attached to direct, the script
died and that was that.  The producer had the financing and everything in place
to make the movie and I, moron that I was, didn’t let him make my movie.  I still
own the script.  It sits on a shelf, sneering at me.<br /><br />
In my writing, there is not a writing mistake I have not made.  Repeatedly. 
I’ve done everything wrong there is to do, but not in the draft I handed in. 
I tried to correct the mistakes before I showed the material to anybody in the business.<br /><br />
Another gigantic mistake I’ve made is to allow my heart to rule my head when it comes
to choosing material.  The longer I take to decide what to write, the better
off I am.  Just because I think it’s a great idea and is something that will
easily sell, doesn’t mean it will sell.  I have an eclectic personality, and
that is doom when it comes to choosing material.  No one is a master of all genres,
and you need to pick the one or two you’re good at and stick with them.  I’ve
never written the same thing twice, and that’s a hindrance.  Better to find a
groove and stay in it.<br /><br /><br /><b>Screenwriting is a collaborative art form; screenwriters must know how to work
and get along with directors, producers, designers, actors, etc.  Having given
screenwriters the 100 mistakes made when writing a script… what are the top three
mistakes screenwriters often make during the rest of the production process, when
dealing with all the other people and parts of making a movie?</b><br /><br />
It’s tricky to deal with a producer and their notes.  You want to do the notes
that will help the script while tactfully forgetting the ones that are destructive. 
Bear in mind that no one, at least I tell myself this, no one is trying to destroy
your screenplay, but sometimes people who don’t have a great story sense will give
you a note that sounds like a good idea to them, but, if executed, will eventually
cause the entire house of cards that is the story, to collapse.  
<br /><br />
You have to listen, to everybody, and figure out how to deal with what they say they
want.  Sometimes it’s not what they really mean, because they don’t know what
they really mean.  That makes it tougher.<br /><br />
Being arrogant is death.  You are not in charge and your goal is to get your
story told... not rigorously protect the material from people you may see as Visigoths. 
Producers loathe writers who guard every word like it’s sacrosanct.  Don’t fight
for every phrase like it’s Omaha Beach.  They’re just trying to help you make
your movie.  A movie in a theater that you wrote, that got changed some, is far
more valuable and interesting to your career than a screenplay that is 100% unaltered...
but that never got made...!  They are paying you to execute the notes, so don’t
be a brat.<br /><br />
I just had dinner with a guy who had investors for a project and $20 million to fund
it.  They flew in a private jet to meet the writers and tell them the changes
they wanted done so they could pull the trigger.  The writers refused to change
anything.  The investors got on their plane and flew away.  And the writers
still... control... their material!  Whaddya bet their wives aren’t too happy
with them?<br /><br />
A simple thing about notes is to write it all down, when you’re in the meeting. 
Don’t trust memory.  Write it down, then decide later what you’re going to do
and not do.  If you take killer notes, at least you’ll come out of the meeting
knowing precisely what was discussed.  I take my laptop to every meeting, so
I walk away knowing what was said.  Then I have a checklist to go through.<br /><br /><br /><b>You have a unique career, because half your career is dedicated to teaching young
writers to write.  And as you say in the dedication of your book, you’ve learned
a ton from your students.  So… what have you learned from your students? 
What has teaching taught you that makes you a better writer?</b><br /><br />
By correcting their mistakes, I am reminded not to make those mistakes in my writing. 
Their enthusiasm for what they are doing is always contagious, so their fire for the
work constantly fuels my own.  I’ve written screenplays with my students, too,
and that’s a great way to learn.  Plus, it’s fun to hang out with people younger
than I am.  They have different world views and opinions and listen to better
music.<br /><br /><br /><p></p></div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8" />
      </body>
      <title>GUEST PERSPECTIVE: How NOT to Write a Screenplay</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/GUEST+PERSPECTIVE+How+NOT+To+Write+A+Screenplay.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hey, screenwriters--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm excited to present a special guest today... &lt;a href="http://www.willakers.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;William
M. Akers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, author of the new screenwriting book, &lt;a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Your
Screenplay Sucks! 100 Ways To Make It Great&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, from &lt;a href="http://shop.mwp.com/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Michael
Wiese Productions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and... my former screenwriting teacher at &lt;a href="http://www.vanderbilt.edu/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vanderbilt
University&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.willakers.com/"&gt;Will&lt;/a&gt; was not only a great teacher (and my
first screenwriting professor ever), but he's written movies and television for virtually
every major network and studio from MGM and Disney to FOX, NBC, and ABC.&amp;nbsp; He's
currently writing a movie for Overture Films which is being directed by Jon Amiel.&amp;nbsp;
This is his first book... and he's done an incredible job.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your Screenplay Sucks!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is
a terrific first outing, not only because it's packed with great info, tips, and insight,
but because it has a wonderfully unique approach to working on your script.&amp;nbsp;
First of all, it's a great book to read if you've never written a screenplay and want
some terrific first-time-out pointers and help.&amp;nbsp; But more importantly and uniquely...
this is a great book to read if you've already learned-- or are in the process of
learning-- how to do it, and want to make sure your script is as good as it can possibly
be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Basically, &lt;a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your Screenplay Sucks!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is
a comprehensive checklist of the 100 things screenwriters almost NEVER do... but should.&amp;nbsp;
It pinpoints specific mistakes writers make-- such as "you don't have a killer first
page" or "you haven't buried exposition like Jimmy Hoffa" or "you call shots"-- which
makes it easy to focus in on specific aspects of your script and punch them up.&amp;nbsp;
And because it's in checklist form, you can just go down the list, looking at and
improving each aspect until you've whipped your screenplay into shape.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, this book doesn't use kid gloves.&amp;nbsp; It doesn't coddle you and give you warm-your-heart
artistic advice like "listen to your heart" or "find the hidden writer within."&amp;nbsp;
This book is designed to pummel mistakes out of your script until it's better.&amp;nbsp;
It has sections like "you didn't run your spellcheck, you moron!" and "you blew your
first ten pages! Arggggghhhhh!" and "you think your script is special and rules don't
apply."&amp;nbsp; Many of the mistakes are mistakes screenwriters at all levels continue
to make.&amp;nbsp; As such, it doesn't pull punches... it ribs you, goads you, and takes
your script to task until its better (which, even in and of itself, is a great lesson
in writing with "voice").&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So do yourself a favor... head to your nearest bookstore, or click &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Screenplay-Sucks-Ways-Great/dp/1932907459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1219508299&amp;amp;sr=8-1"&gt;&lt;b&gt;HERE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to
go to Amazon, and grab yourself a copy of &lt;a href="http://www.yourscreenplaysucks.com/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your
Screenplay Sucks!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; But first... check out the interview I did this week
with &lt;a href="http://www.willakers.com/"&gt;Will&lt;/a&gt;... you'll learn a bit more about
him, the book, and writing in general...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Will... you have a unique career, because you write and teach… and you do both
far from the madding crowds of Hollywood.&amp;nbsp; So let’s begin by learning your path.&amp;nbsp;
Tell me how you started writing professionally… and how you got to where you are today.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When I was in the third grade, my teacher would read to us after lunch.&amp;nbsp; My favorite
book was &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Wolves of Willoughby Chase&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, an English adventure with wolves,
sleighs in the snow, and little girls and a wicked governess who kills their parents
for their money.&amp;nbsp; After I got out of USC grad school, I knew I wanted to write,
so I looked at things that had been eating at me for a long time, (which make the
best subjects for screenplays, btw) and I had never forgotten the book that had been
read to me as a child.&amp;nbsp; I ended up optioning it.&amp;nbsp; Nine months later, I had
a screenplay.&amp;nbsp; It was produced by Zenith Productions in London.&amp;nbsp; It found
a home on the Disney Channel and I was nominated for a CableAce.&amp;nbsp; Actually, that
wasn’t my first professional gig.&amp;nbsp; Haven’t thought of this in a while.&amp;nbsp;
When I was still at USC, I was sitting outside the chairman’s office telling stories
to his assistant and he came out of his office, pointed at me and said, “Are you a
writer?”&amp;nbsp; I said, “Sure.”&amp;nbsp; He said, “Come in my office.”&amp;nbsp; He didn’t
know my name.&amp;nbsp; Someone had called, a manager for child actors, and wanted USC’s
best writing student to write a screenplay for one of his clients.&amp;nbsp; The chairman
told him he had just the writer in mind, opened his door, and saw me.&amp;nbsp; I got
paid $1,500 dollars.&amp;nbsp; Needless to say, the movie never got made.&amp;nbsp; I love
the idea that this manager thought the chairman went through some involved search
to get to me, their “best writing student” and he didn’t even know my name.&amp;nbsp;
Easiest way I ever got a job.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
After the first job, I had to get the next one.&amp;nbsp; I’ve always had an agent in
Los Angeles, and if you live out of town, it helps.&amp;nbsp; But, you can’t sit around
waiting for your agent to land you a job.&amp;nbsp; You have to go out and beat the bushes.&amp;nbsp;
I’ve sold pitches, sold spec scripts, and been hired on assignment.&amp;nbsp; Every year
is different.&amp;nbsp; Some years, I haven’t worked at all.&amp;nbsp; It helps to have no
credit card debt and as small a house note as possible!&amp;nbsp; Even when I’m not getting
paid to write, I’m still writing spec material.&amp;nbsp; I tend to write every day, so
after a while, that’s a lot of pages.&amp;nbsp; It’s been a hodgepodge of trying to get
work, and failing, and wasting time, and being lucky, and writing and writing and
writing.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes it works and most times it doesn’t.&amp;nbsp; The key is that
you have to enjoy it even when it’s not working.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Right now, I’m rewriting a spec I sold.&amp;nbsp; Done eleven drafts for the producers
in nearly two years.&amp;nbsp; The script is about the fall of Saigon.&amp;nbsp; Jon Amiel
is directing it, and, under his aegis, the script has only gotten better.&amp;nbsp; “Development
paradise” is not a phrase you often hear, but it applies to this one.&amp;nbsp; I just
sold a pitch about a cop in London, based on a true story, and am waiting for the
contracts to be negotiated before I start work.&amp;nbsp; So there is a bit of activity
here and there... 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;You’ve written and sold numerous screenplays, and now you’ve published a book about
screenwriting.&amp;nbsp; One of the things that makes this book unique is its approach
and tone.&amp;nbsp; It’s not a how-to book for beginners trying their first screenplay;
it’s an in-your-face pummeling for people who have written a few scripts and want
to whip them into shape.&amp;nbsp; It doesn’t pull punches or wear kiddie gloves; it’s
a brutally honest assessment of the 100 biggest mistakes you see in beginners’ screenplays.&amp;nbsp;
So what compelled you, when you already have a successful screenwriting career, to
write this book?&amp;nbsp; And how did you decide on its unique voice and checklist format?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First of all, &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Screenplay-Sucks-Ways-Great/dp/1932907459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1219508299&amp;amp;sr=8-1"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your
Screenplay Sucks!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is aimed at both beginning and more experienced writers.&amp;nbsp;
There’s a lot in there about generating an idea and how to develop characters and
especially what I call “physical writing” -- how to write a clean sentence that actually
tells the reader what you think it means... That’s useful to a writer just starting
her first script, and you don’t often see it covered in books.&amp;nbsp; As for experienced
writers, I’ve heard from people who’ve been selling material for twenty years who
said the book reminded them of stuff they had forgotten they were supposed to be doing.&amp;nbsp;
Anybody who is contemplating starting a script, or rewriting one, can benefit.&amp;nbsp;
So much for the commercial plug.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As to where it came from, I wrote it in self defense.&amp;nbsp; I’ve been critiquing screenplays
for a long time, and I found that beginning writers all make the same mistakes.&amp;nbsp;
Over and over and over and over.&amp;nbsp; So, I thought to create a checklist so the
writer could do all this boilerplate stuff I had to tell every client about, and then
send me their script so I could hammer them on structure and character instead of
“don’t have character names that rhyme,” “take out thes and thats,” “make your prose
crystal clear,” and “beware of research...”&amp;nbsp; The book’s voice is my voice.&amp;nbsp;
I dictated the first draft of the book, so it’s a breezy read and, for a screenwriting
book, pretty funny.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;How did the process of writing a book differ from the process of writing a screenplay?&amp;nbsp;
What surprised you about the differences in writing a book?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I wrote a table of contents and a few chapters, sent it to the publisher, and they
said “Go for it.” Once I knew it was going to be published, it was a complete blast
to write.&amp;nbsp; Like writing a movie, I suppose, where you know the producer has a
put deal.&amp;nbsp; Not that that’s ever happened to me... I basically wrote it for myself
and had fun.&amp;nbsp; I put in there whatever the hell I thought would be helpful, and
that’s what came out the other end.&amp;nbsp; No development hell.&amp;nbsp; I rewrote it
a lot, but what’s there is what I wanted.&amp;nbsp; A lot easier than writing a screenplay,
that’s for sure.&amp;nbsp; What surprised me is how much fun I had writing it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now that you’ve finished the book and returned to screenwriting, how has going through
the book-writing process helped your screenwriting chops and process?&amp;nbsp; Or has
it?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Interesting question.&amp;nbsp; Act III of the book is about selling your screenplay and
dealing with producers and Hollywood, and I have found myself trying to take my own
advice.&amp;nbsp; Weird, huh?&amp;nbsp; All the painstaking work I did on the rewriting section
of the book has helped my first drafts.&amp;nbsp; There is so much in the book about being
clear and concise, that writing it rubbed off on my own work.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;You’ve done what few people are able to do… maintain a successful screenwriting
career while living far from the heart of Los Angeles.&amp;nbsp; How do you do this?&amp;nbsp;
What advice do you have for screenwriters and aspirants who don’t live—or can’t get
to—Los Angeles?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Horrible question.&amp;nbsp; Do you actually want the truth?&amp;nbsp; It’s a bitch-willy
to write and not live in L.A..&amp;nbsp; I lived there three years as a grad student in
film school.&amp;nbsp; Then three more years getting my career going.&amp;nbsp; I’m still
dining off those six years of living in Los Angeles full time.&amp;nbsp; For six more
years after that, I kept an apartment in West Hollywood and commuted regularly until
my sharp-fanged, drooling landlord figured out a way to throw me out.&amp;nbsp; So, I
did put in my time in L.A.&amp;nbsp; Living someplace else, lobbing scripts at Los Angeles,
hoping someone will notice is, if you want my opinion, a fool’s paradise.&amp;nbsp; You
don’t want to confuse hope with denial.&amp;nbsp; You can win a contest and get discovered,
but that’s not easy.&amp;nbsp; Every agent I’ve ever had came because a friend held a
gun to their head, handed them a script and said, “Read this.&amp;nbsp; This guy walks
on water.”&amp;nbsp; I never had a single query letter answered.&amp;nbsp; Not one.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Okay, so much for the depressing part... Now for the advice.&amp;nbsp; Figure out a way
to get to Los Angeles, regularly. Find people who live there who you can meet.&amp;nbsp;
Facebook.&amp;nbsp; Network.&amp;nbsp; Lie.&amp;nbsp; Use the internet.&amp;nbsp; Use the Creative
Directory.&amp;nbsp; Talk to 18 year old kids about how to do it.&amp;nbsp; Take a marketing
person to lunch and squeeze them dry for free.&amp;nbsp; Get out there somehow.&amp;nbsp;
Or, get your material out there.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course, the single best (and essential) thing you can do is to write a great screenplay.&amp;nbsp;
Not a good one, either, mind you.&amp;nbsp; There’re lots of them all over.&amp;nbsp; In gutters.&amp;nbsp;
Being used to clean windshields at gas stations.&amp;nbsp; L.A. is lousy with good scripts.&amp;nbsp;
Any jackass can write a good screenplay.&amp;nbsp; But, keep in mind, they’re not interested
in good scripts, only great ones.&amp;nbsp; So write a great one.&amp;nbsp; If it takes you
three years, so be it.&amp;nbsp; If your script is great, people will pass your material
on to someone they know because it makes them look good.&amp;nbsp; Great material will
open doors.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Remember, that if you ever do meet someone “real” who is in a position to pass your
script on to someone else, your script has to be bulletproof.&amp;nbsp; You will only
get one read.&amp;nbsp; If it’s not fantastic, they will never read anything from you
again.&amp;nbsp; You have to make it perfect.&amp;nbsp; Hence the crying need for writers
to buy my book or hire me to crit their script before it’s too late!&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;You teach college students, so you’re often working with young writers just starting
to experiment with screenwriting and storytelling.&amp;nbsp; What are the top three mistakes
you see beginning writers make?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They don’t have a breathtakingly original, wildly creative, non-derivative idea.&amp;nbsp;
They put the backstory in the first act.&amp;nbsp; They don’t take the time to pare down
the scene description and dialogue to the bare stark-white bones.&amp;nbsp; They have
character names that rhyme or start with the same letter.&amp;nbsp; Their bad guy is poorly
constructed.&amp;nbsp; They don’t separate out the characters’s voices.&amp;nbsp; They didn’t
throw out the first twenty pages.&amp;nbsp; They don’t have a clue how the motion picture
or television business operates.&amp;nbsp; They are arrogant and think the rules don’t
apply.&amp;nbsp; They argue when you give them notes.&amp;nbsp; They don’t keep the reader
in mind when they are writing.&amp;nbsp; Those’re probably the top three mistakes. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Screenplay-Sucks-Ways-Great/dp/1932907459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1219508299&amp;amp;sr=8-1"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your
Screenplay Sucks!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; details 100 mistakes you see aspiring screenwriters make
in their projects.&amp;nbsp; But what are the biggest mistakes you’ve made… both in your
actual writing and your career… and what have you learned from them?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Biggest mistake I ever made was when a producer wanted to make a script of mine and
I told him... “No.”&amp;nbsp; The script was autobiographical and I wanted to direct it
myself.&amp;nbsp; Idiot.&amp;nbsp; The instant I said I was attached to direct, the script
died and that was that.&amp;nbsp; The producer had the financing and everything in place
to make the movie and I, moron that I was, didn’t let him make my movie.&amp;nbsp; I still
own the script.&amp;nbsp; It sits on a shelf, sneering at me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In my writing, there is not a writing mistake I have not made.&amp;nbsp; Repeatedly.&amp;nbsp;
I’ve done everything wrong there is to do, but not in the draft I handed in.&amp;nbsp;
I tried to correct the mistakes before I showed the material to anybody in the business.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Another gigantic mistake I’ve made is to allow my heart to rule my head when it comes
to choosing material.&amp;nbsp; The longer I take to decide what to write, the better
off I am.&amp;nbsp; Just because I think it’s a great idea and is something that will
easily sell, doesn’t mean it will sell.&amp;nbsp; I have an eclectic personality, and
that is doom when it comes to choosing material.&amp;nbsp; No one is a master of all genres,
and you need to pick the one or two you’re good at and stick with them.&amp;nbsp; I’ve
never written the same thing twice, and that’s a hindrance.&amp;nbsp; Better to find a
groove and stay in it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Screenwriting is a collaborative art form; screenwriters must know how to work
and get along with directors, producers, designers, actors, etc.&amp;nbsp; Having given
screenwriters the 100 mistakes made when writing a script… what are the top three
mistakes screenwriters often make during the rest of the production process, when
dealing with all the other people and parts of making a movie?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It’s tricky to deal with a producer and their notes.&amp;nbsp; You want to do the notes
that will help the script while tactfully forgetting the ones that are destructive.&amp;nbsp;
Bear in mind that no one, at least I tell myself this, no one is trying to destroy
your screenplay, but sometimes people who don’t have a great story sense will give
you a note that sounds like a good idea to them, but, if executed, will eventually
cause the entire house of cards that is the story, to collapse.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You have to listen, to everybody, and figure out how to deal with what they say they
want.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes it’s not what they really mean, because they don’t know what
they really mean.&amp;nbsp; That makes it tougher.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Being arrogant is death.&amp;nbsp; You are not in charge and your goal is to get your
story told... not rigorously protect the material from people you may see as Visigoths.&amp;nbsp;
Producers loathe writers who guard every word like it’s sacrosanct.&amp;nbsp; Don’t fight
for every phrase like it’s Omaha Beach.&amp;nbsp; They’re just trying to help you make
your movie.&amp;nbsp; A movie in a theater that you wrote, that got changed some, is far
more valuable and interesting to your career than a screenplay that is 100% unaltered...
but that never got made...!&amp;nbsp; They are paying you to execute the notes, so don’t
be a brat.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I just had dinner with a guy who had investors for a project and $20 million to fund
it.&amp;nbsp; They flew in a private jet to meet the writers and tell them the changes
they wanted done so they could pull the trigger.&amp;nbsp; The writers refused to change
anything.&amp;nbsp; The investors got on their plane and flew away.&amp;nbsp; And the writers
still... control... their material!&amp;nbsp; Whaddya bet their wives aren’t too happy
with them?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A simple thing about notes is to write it all down, when you’re in the meeting.&amp;nbsp;
Don’t trust memory.&amp;nbsp; Write it down, then decide later what you’re going to do
and not do.&amp;nbsp; If you take killer notes, at least you’ll come out of the meeting
knowing precisely what was discussed.&amp;nbsp; I take my laptop to every meeting, so
I walk away knowing what was said.&amp;nbsp; Then I have a checklist to go through.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;You have a unique career, because half your career is dedicated to teaching young
writers to write.&amp;nbsp; And as you say in the dedication of your book, you’ve learned
a ton from your students.&amp;nbsp; So… what have you learned from your students?&amp;nbsp;
What has teaching taught you that makes you a better writer?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
By correcting their mistakes, I am reminded not to make those mistakes in my writing.&amp;nbsp;
Their enthusiasm for what they are doing is always contagious, so their fire for the
work constantly fuels my own.&amp;nbsp; I’ve written screenplays with my students, too,
and that’s a great way to learn.&amp;nbsp; Plus, it’s fun to hang out with people younger
than I am.&amp;nbsp; They have different world views and opinions and listen to better
music.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,7b43740c-4164-49b4-a6c8-d1858e1466b8.aspx</comments>
      <category>Books Tools Resources</category>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Guest Perspectives</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing Advice</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>And here's the conclusion to this weekend's post, the TOP 5 WAYS TO WIN <b><i>WRITERS
DIGEST</i></b>'s annual screenwriting contest...<br /><br />
5)  STAGE DIRECTIONS – PART II.  Do not over-write descriptions in your
stage directions.  Give the reader only the bare minimum of what he/she needs
to know in order to understand your story.  Elaborate scenic descriptions, character
profiles, or visuals of props and costumes have no place in a screenplay… no matter
how colorfully you see these things in your head.  If you enjoy writing these
elements, put them in a novel or short story.<br /><br />
4)  DIALOGUE.  Do NOT write long chunks of dialogue.  Like with stage
directions, try to keep each paragraph of dialogue under 3 lines.  Sometimes,
obviously, you’ll need more… if someone is ranting or lecturing… but dialogue should
be short and snappy.  (And real people rarely speak in long chucks; actual dialogue
tends to be in quick exchanges.)<br /><br />
3)  VOICE-OVER.  If you’re going to use voice-over, use it VERY sparingly. 
Many writers believe V.O. is a crutch used to avoid dramatizing story.  I don’t
necessarily agree with this—there are many stories that use voice-over to great effect—but
it’s often easy for it to BECOME a crutch, to use a character’s voice-over to set
the stage, color the world, or give us exposition that isn’t necessary to the story. 
Some entries began with two, three, or four pages of one character’s V.O., and even
without reading it, seeing this is as much of a turnoff as pages of stage description. 
Treat V.O. like any other piece of dialogue… it should be short and to the point.<br /><br />
2)  SOUNDING CONTEMPORARY.  Do NOT worry about making characters sound “cool”
or “contemporary” at the risk of honesty.  In other words, don’t use slang or
speech patterns if you don’t use them naturally.  There were many entries where
writers seemed to be writing about foreign places, people, etc.  This is fine—the
whole point of storytelling is to transport the reader (and writer!) to new places—but
capturing accurate speech patterns is less important than capturing emotional honesty. 
So if your story is set on the streets of Watts or in the backwoods of Georgia… but
you’ve never been to those places… don’t try to recreate your version of street slang
or southern drawl.  You’ll be much more convincing if you accurately convey how
your characters FEEL—even if their speech is totally inaccurate—than if you throw
in a bunch of misused colloquialisms.<br /><br />
1)  WRITE WHAT YOU KNOW.  I know we all hear this a lot, but this does NOT
mean you should write something autobiographical… or you shouldn’t set something in
a faraway time or place.  It means “write what you know EMOTIONALLY,” and be
honest about it.  If you’re writing about a medieval knight who longs to leave
his home and family to see the world, tap into what you dislike about your own home. 
Listen to fights you have with your family and transcribe them into your script. 
Many entries were set in interesting places, but they didn’t seem to reflect any emotional
reality in the writer’s life; they didn’t ring with the truth of universal emotions. 
We all experience love, loss, grief, elation, melancholy, wistfulness… and while we
all have our own life experiences, the experiences of these emotions are usually identical. 
The more honestly you can type into your own feelings, the more strongly we connect
to your writing and see it as a reflection of our own lives.<br /><br /><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3" />
      </body>
      <title>Top 10 Ways To Win Writers Digest's Annual Screenwriting Contest - Part II</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Top+10+Ways+To+Win+Writers+Digests+Annual+Screenwriting+Contest+Part+II.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;And here's the conclusion to this weekend's post, the TOP 5 WAYS TO WIN &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;WRITERS
DIGEST&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;'s annual screenwriting contest...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
5)&amp;nbsp; STAGE DIRECTIONS – PART II.&amp;nbsp; Do not over-write descriptions in your
stage directions.&amp;nbsp; Give the reader only the bare minimum of what he/she needs
to know in order to understand your story.&amp;nbsp; Elaborate scenic descriptions, character
profiles, or visuals of props and costumes have no place in a screenplay… no matter
how colorfully you see these things in your head.&amp;nbsp; If you enjoy writing these
elements, put them in a novel or short story.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
4)&amp;nbsp; DIALOGUE.&amp;nbsp; Do NOT write long chunks of dialogue.&amp;nbsp; Like with stage
directions, try to keep each paragraph of dialogue under 3 lines.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes,
obviously, you’ll need more… if someone is ranting or lecturing… but dialogue should
be short and snappy.&amp;nbsp; (And real people rarely speak in long chucks; actual dialogue
tends to be in quick exchanges.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3)&amp;nbsp; VOICE-OVER.&amp;nbsp; If you’re going to use voice-over, use it VERY sparingly.&amp;nbsp;
Many writers believe V.O. is a crutch used to avoid dramatizing story.&amp;nbsp; I don’t
necessarily agree with this—there are many stories that use voice-over to great effect—but
it’s often easy for it to BECOME a crutch, to use a character’s voice-over to set
the stage, color the world, or give us exposition that isn’t necessary to the story.&amp;nbsp;
Some entries began with two, three, or four pages of one character’s V.O., and even
without reading it, seeing this is as much of a turnoff as pages of stage description.&amp;nbsp;
Treat V.O. like any other piece of dialogue… it should be short and to the point.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2)&amp;nbsp; SOUNDING CONTEMPORARY.&amp;nbsp; Do NOT worry about making characters sound “cool”
or “contemporary” at the risk of honesty.&amp;nbsp; In other words, don’t use slang or
speech patterns if you don’t use them naturally.&amp;nbsp; There were many entries where
writers seemed to be writing about foreign places, people, etc.&amp;nbsp; This is fine—the
whole point of storytelling is to transport the reader (and writer!) to new places—but
capturing accurate speech patterns is less important than capturing emotional honesty.&amp;nbsp;
So if your story is set on the streets of Watts or in the backwoods of Georgia… but
you’ve never been to those places… don’t try to recreate your version of street slang
or southern drawl.&amp;nbsp; You’ll be much more convincing if you accurately convey how
your characters FEEL—even if their speech is totally inaccurate—than if you throw
in a bunch of misused colloquialisms.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1)&amp;nbsp; WRITE WHAT YOU KNOW.&amp;nbsp; I know we all hear this a lot, but this does NOT
mean you should write something autobiographical… or you shouldn’t set something in
a faraway time or place.&amp;nbsp; It means “write what you know EMOTIONALLY,” and be
honest about it.&amp;nbsp; If you’re writing about a medieval knight who longs to leave
his home and family to see the world, tap into what you dislike about your own home.&amp;nbsp;
Listen to fights you have with your family and transcribe them into your script.&amp;nbsp;
Many entries were set in interesting places, but they didn’t seem to reflect any emotional
reality in the writer’s life; they didn’t ring with the truth of universal emotions.&amp;nbsp;
We all experience love, loss, grief, elation, melancholy, wistfulness… and while we
all have our own life experiences, the experiences of these emotions are usually identical.&amp;nbsp;
The more honestly you can type into your own feelings, the more strongly we connect
to your writing and see it as a reflection of our own lives.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,bd4dd470-032f-4f02-806a-597328718aa3.aspx</comments>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Jobs Contests Opportunities</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing Advice</category>
      <category>Writing TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/competitions/">
                    <b>
                      <i>Writers Digest</i>
                    </b>’s
annual writing contest</a> is in full swing… fiction, poetry, non-fiction… and, of
course, screenwriting.  I’ve been judging the screenwriting division for the
past few years, and I always love it—it’s a blast reading and discovering new talent. 
And this year is no different, so I’ve been poring over hundreds of scripts, many
of which are really good.<br /><br />
Unfortunately, not all scripts can be terrific, and I often notice that the not-so-terrific
ones are not-so-terrific for the exact same reasons.  In fact, many of these
scripts COULD be terrific, but they fall into certain traps that keep them from being
as good as they could/should be.<br /><br />
So I wanted to dedicate a couple blog posts to the WD writers contest… and how to
give yourself the best possible chance of winning.  So here’s Part One of…<br /><font size="3"><br /><b>THE TOP 10 WAYS TO WIN WD’S ANNUAL SCREENWRITING CONTEST - PART I</b></font><br /><br />
10)  YOUR SYNOPSIS.  Writers Digest asks you to submit a synopsis along
with your script.  Do NOT write a full-page, single-spaced, tiny-font synopsis. 
The purpose of the synopsis is to give a QUICK overview of the story; not detail every
plot turn.  Thus, your synopsis should be one tight paragraph.  When I see
more than that, I rarely read it… and it tells me the writer doesn’t know how to tell
his/her story quickly and succinctly.<br /><br />
9)  FORMAT.  Make sure your screenplay is in PROPER SCREENPLAY FORMAT. 
I’m always stunned at how many entries aren’t written in standard script format; some
are written as plays, some are single-spaced without tabs, others just make up their
own format.  Here’s the thing: if your screenplay is NOT in standard format,
it’ll be glanced at, but its chances of winning are greatly diminished.  And
in a real-life situation, an exec or producer probably won’t read it at all; it’ll
just go in the trash.  I know this seems nitpicky and harsh, but in an age where
everyone is only moments away from the Internet, a library, or a bookstore, there’s
no excuse for not having proper formatting.  (And with software like Final Draft
or Movie Magic Screenwriter, the computer formats the script for you.)<br /><br />
8)  YOUR FIRST PAGE – PART I.  Even before I actually begin reading your
first page, I’m judging your script.  If your first page consists entirely of
stage directions, it looks dense, daunting, and uninviting.  To be honest, I
probably won’t even read the whole thing or make it to page two.  This is true
in the real world as well; execs and producers are looking for any reason to not turn
the page, and a big paragraphs of stage directions are a great one.<br /><br />
7)  YOUR FIRST PAGE – PART II.  Jump into major conflict on your first page. 
Do NOT take time to “set the stage.”  Jump into action, dialogue, and conflict
at the top of page one.  It’s a gross misnomer that stories need a few pages
to establish the main characters or setting.  Not only do we rarely need this
info in order to start a story, but it’s more effectively conveyed if it comes through
as we watch the action/conflict unfold.  If you begin by “setting the stage,”
I promise you: your reader will be bored by page two.<br /><br />
6)  STAGE DIRECTIONS – PART I. Do NOT write huge paragraphs of stage description. 
I try to never write stage directions over 3 lines long.  If I need more, I’ll
OCCASIONALLY go to 4 lines… but never more.  If you still need more, break it
up into different paragraphs.  But few things turn readers off more than seeing
massive chunks of stage direction.  (And the truth is: you DON’T need more than
3 lines.  The job of stage directions is to give us only info and action we MUST
know to follow the story; don’t waste your readers’ time with detailed descriptions
of people, places, clothing, etc.)<br /><br />
Stay tuned for the next five tips... have a good weekend!<br /><br />
Chad<br /><p></p></div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e" />
      </body>
      <title>Top 10 Ways To Win Writers Digest's Annual Screenwriting Contest - Part I</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Top+10+Ways+To+Win+Writers+Digests+Annual+Screenwriting+Contest+Part+I.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/competitions/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Writers Digest&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;’s
annual writing contest&lt;/a&gt; is in full swing… fiction, poetry, non-fiction… and, of
course, screenwriting.&amp;nbsp; I’ve been judging the screenwriting division for the
past few years, and I always love it—it’s a blast reading and discovering new talent.&amp;nbsp;
And this year is no different, so I’ve been poring over hundreds of scripts, many
of which are really good.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Unfortunately, not all scripts can be terrific, and I often notice that the not-so-terrific
ones are not-so-terrific for the exact same reasons.&amp;nbsp; In fact, many of these
scripts COULD be terrific, but they fall into certain traps that keep them from being
as good as they could/should be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So I wanted to dedicate a couple blog posts to the WD writers contest… and how to
give yourself the best possible chance of winning.&amp;nbsp; So here’s Part One of…&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font size="3"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;THE TOP 10 WAYS TO WIN WD’S ANNUAL SCREENWRITING CONTEST - PART I&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
10)&amp;nbsp; YOUR SYNOPSIS.&amp;nbsp; Writers Digest asks you to submit a synopsis along
with your script.&amp;nbsp; Do NOT write a full-page, single-spaced, tiny-font synopsis.&amp;nbsp;
The purpose of the synopsis is to give a QUICK overview of the story; not detail every
plot turn.&amp;nbsp; Thus, your synopsis should be one tight paragraph.&amp;nbsp; When I see
more than that, I rarely read it… and it tells me the writer doesn’t know how to tell
his/her story quickly and succinctly.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
9)&amp;nbsp; FORMAT.&amp;nbsp; Make sure your screenplay is in PROPER SCREENPLAY FORMAT.&amp;nbsp;
I’m always stunned at how many entries aren’t written in standard script format; some
are written as plays, some are single-spaced without tabs, others just make up their
own format.&amp;nbsp; Here’s the thing: if your screenplay is NOT in standard format,
it’ll be glanced at, but its chances of winning are greatly diminished.&amp;nbsp; And
in a real-life situation, an exec or producer probably won’t read it at all; it’ll
just go in the trash.&amp;nbsp; I know this seems nitpicky and harsh, but in an age where
everyone is only moments away from the Internet, a library, or a bookstore, there’s
no excuse for not having proper formatting.&amp;nbsp; (And with software like Final Draft
or Movie Magic Screenwriter, the computer formats the script for you.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
8)&amp;nbsp; YOUR FIRST PAGE – PART I.&amp;nbsp; Even before I actually begin reading your
first page, I’m judging your script.&amp;nbsp; If your first page consists entirely of
stage directions, it looks dense, daunting, and uninviting.&amp;nbsp; To be honest, I
probably won’t even read the whole thing or make it to page two.&amp;nbsp; This is true
in the real world as well; execs and producers are looking for any reason to not turn
the page, and a big paragraphs of stage directions are a great one.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
7)&amp;nbsp; YOUR FIRST PAGE – PART II.&amp;nbsp; Jump into major conflict on your first page.&amp;nbsp;
Do NOT take time to “set the stage.”&amp;nbsp; Jump into action, dialogue, and conflict
at the top of page one.&amp;nbsp; It’s a gross misnomer that stories need a few pages
to establish the main characters or setting.&amp;nbsp; Not only do we rarely need this
info in order to start a story, but it’s more effectively conveyed if it comes through
as we watch the action/conflict unfold.&amp;nbsp; If you begin by “setting the stage,”
I promise you: your reader will be bored by page two.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
6)&amp;nbsp; STAGE DIRECTIONS – PART I. Do NOT write huge paragraphs of stage description.&amp;nbsp;
I try to never write stage directions over 3 lines long.&amp;nbsp; If I need more, I’ll
OCCASIONALLY go to 4 lines… but never more.&amp;nbsp; If you still need more, break it
up into different paragraphs.&amp;nbsp; But few things turn readers off more than seeing
massive chunks of stage direction.&amp;nbsp; (And the truth is: you DON’T need more than
3 lines.&amp;nbsp; The job of stage directions is to give us only info and action we MUST
know to follow the story; don’t waste your readers’ time with detailed descriptions
of people, places, clothing, etc.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Stay tuned for the next five tips... have a good weekend!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Chad&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,bf14d635-0ab9-4a96-9409-b055ef18171e.aspx</comments>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Jobs Contests Opportunities</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing Advice</category>
      <category>Writing TV</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/Trackback.aspx?guid=f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Hey, guys--<br /><br />
Happy <b>Fourth of July</b> weekend!  I wanted to point you all to my <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/diablo-cody">interview
with <b>Diablo Cody</b></a>, the <b>Academy-Award</b>-winning screenwriter of <a href="http://www.foxsearchlight.com/juno/"><i><b>Juno</b></i></a>,
which appears in this month's issue of <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/GeneralMenu/"><i><b>Writers
Digest</b></i></a>.  Diablo was one of the most fun interviews I've done, and
she's got some terrific insights into screenwriting... take a look <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/diablo-cody">HERE</a>!<br /><br />
In the mean time, have a great weekend!...<br /><br />
Chad<br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7" />
      </body>
      <title>A Few Moments with Diablo Cody</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/PermaLink,guid,f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/A+Few+Moments+With+Diablo+Cody.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hey, guys--&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Happy &lt;b&gt;Fourth of July&lt;/b&gt; weekend!&amp;nbsp; I wanted to point you all to my &lt;a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/diablo-cody"&gt;interview
with &lt;b&gt;Diablo Cody&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;b&gt;Academy-Award&lt;/b&gt;-winning screenwriter of &lt;a href="http://www.foxsearchlight.com/juno/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Juno&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
which appears in this month's issue of &lt;a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/GeneralMenu/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Writers
Digest&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Diablo was one of the most fun interviews I've done, and
she's got some terrific insights into screenwriting... take a look &lt;a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/diablo-cody"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the mean time, have a great weekend!...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Chad&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/aggbug.ashx?id=f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.writersdigest.com/scriptnotes/CommentView,guid,f5a5838e-a5eb-4884-971e-b6c0a7e3b9d7.aspx</comments>
      <category>Career Advice</category>
      <category>Fun Stuff</category>
      <category>Guest Perspectives</category>
      <category>Screenwriting (Film)</category>
      <category>Writing Advice</category>
      <category>Writing TV</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>