Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (5) |
| October, 2009 (8) |
| September, 2009 (16) |
| August, 2009 (10) |
| July, 2009 (11) |
| June, 2009 (14) |
| May, 2009 (17) |
| April, 2009 (8) |
| March, 2009 (13) |
| February, 2009 (16) |
| January, 2009 (15) |
| December, 2008 (14) |
| November, 2008 (16) |
| October, 2008 (20) |
| September, 2008 (14) |
| August, 2008 (15) |
| July, 2008 (13) |
| June, 2008 (7) |
| May, 2008 (10) |
| April, 2008 (13) |
| March, 2008 (16) |
| February, 2008 (22) |
| January, 2008 (42) |
| December, 2007 (24) |
| November, 2007 (40) |
| October, 2007 (1) |
Search
Archives
Blogroll
|
 Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Writing the Reality TV Show - Monday night!
Posted by chad
Hey, TV writers and producers-- If you're in L.A. and interested in knowing how to develop and sell the next Dancing with the Stars or Millionaire Matchmaker, I'm teaching a 3-hour reality TV seminar at mediabistro.com this Monday night, and I'd love to see you there! Here's the scoop... WRITING THE REALITY TV SHOWWhen: Monday, March 3, 7-10 pm Where: mediabistro.com, 7494 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 303, W. Hollywood, CA 90046 Cost: $65 To sign up: Call Stefanie at 310-659-5668 or click HERE
Check out this webpage for more information... or here's the little blurb about it... American Idol. Deal or No Deal. My Super Sweet 16. From the
multi-million-dollar series of broadcast television to the low-budget
niche shows of cable, reality programming dominates television. But are
reality shows really "reality?" How much planning and production goes
into unscripted storytelling? And, most importantly, how can you get in
on the action?
This seminar lays the groundwork for anyone wanting to break into
the lucrative world of reality TV. We'll look at various types of
reality shows and what makes them tick, from docu-dramas and docu-soaps
(Rob & Big, Laguna Beach) to game shows and elimination-style competitions (Hell's Kitchen, Survivor) to personality-driven and "aspirational" series (Tasty Travels, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition).
We'll then discuss how to conceive, develop, and sell your idea.
What are the critical elements of a pitch? Should you attach talent?
Does your series work as a strip? We'll explore how to structure your
reality pitch and get it to the right people. Who are the major
players? When should you attach a senior producer? What networks are
best for your concept? Whether you're a writer, producer, or host,
reality television's waiting for you.
In this seminar, you will learn:
- The difference between reality shows, and how to pitch them accordingly
- The critical elements every reality show and pitch must have
- How to structure a pitch both verbally and as a written document
- How to pitch to networks, studios, and production companies
- When to attach hosts or producers to your idea, and when not to
- What to expect when you're making your pitch, and what happens when you leave
Events Activities and Things To Do
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:22:04 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
The WGA Ratifies Its New Deal
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- Half an hour ago, the Writers Guild of America announced that membership had voted to ratify the new AMPTP contract, putting an official end to the tumult and negotiations that had caused the 100-day writers strike. Here's the official email from the WGA... "To Our Fellow Members: Today, it is our pleasure to inform you that members of the Writers Guilds of America, East and West, have voted to ratify the MBA contract with 93.6% approval. With a total of 4,060 votes cast, the tally was 3,802 to 258. These numbers reaffirm the tremendous level of support and commitment our membership has continuously demonstrated over these last few crucial months. We are also pleased to report that the trustees of our health fund voted yesterday to follow the recommendation in our strike settlement agreement to provide additional coverage and an extension of the earnings cycle for a full quarter (three months) to participants who would otherwise lose health coverage following an earnings cycle that included all or a portion of the strike period. Participants whose health coverage is paid for by points will only be charged points if they have ten or more points as of April 1, 2008. As we close this chapter in our union's history, what we together have accomplished should not be underestimated. The 2008 MBA establishes a beachhead on the Internet and in new media that will guarantee our share of a potentially vast and bountiful future. Writers already are working on new media projects under this agreement and residuals must now be paid for streaming and downloads of our library of films and TV shows. Language in the contract will allow us to monitor and audit these new technologies and new business models, but it will take vigilance on the part of our membership to make sure that original Internet writing is done under a WGA contract and with appropriate terms and conditions. The same sort of vigilance will be needed to assist members of SAG and AFTRA. They are about to go through a similar process to the one we experienced. Their support of our cause was invaluable. We must use all our efforts and experience to support them as well. Further gains that they can achieve will have an immediate, positive effect on our contract. We must take our newfound spirit and unity and use it to move our two unions forward. We look to the future and our newly revitalized member engagement to reaffirm writers as the first among equals in the most collaborative art form in history. As the last few weeks proved once and for all, we are all in this together. Best, Patric M. Verrone President, WGAW Michael Winship President, WGAE" Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:33:27 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 26, 2008
TIP OF THE DAY: The Magic of the Prelap
Posted by chad
Someone once told me that if you hear something three times, it means the universe is sending you a message. Well, I haven't heard this three times yet, but a question came up in my writers group last week... and then I got an email yesterday asking almost the exact same question. And since I was never good with numbers, I figure two times is as good as three. So here ya go... In my writers group, my friend Tony-- an up-and-coming screenwriter who optioned his first script last year-- was working on a new project and having trouble tying two scenes together. Here, take a look... MR. JACKSON Sure, sure. Well, see you next Saturday.
Daniela, precariously balancing her mother-load of hot dogs, shoots Trevor a less than pleased glance. (The problem was: we see Daniela's "less-than-pleased glance" here...)
INT. TREVOR'S APARTMENT - NIGHT
The place is totally seventies. Not hip, retro-cool seventies -- but musty, smells like Grandpa, seventies.
Trevor opens the door, pushing aside a pile of mail.
DANIELA Trevor, you promised you'd meet my dad next Saturday. (...but don't get an answer till here about what she's less-than-pleased about.)
TREVOR Sorry, I forgot. How bout this -- you invite your dad to come to my game. Huh? Afterwards, we'll grab some grub... maybe a beer... maybe two?
Although there isn't a huge amount of time between Daniela's "less than pleased" glance and the line that explains the glance, there's enough time that readers were saying, "Wait-- what? Why is she less-than-pleased? Did I miss something?" And even though they get their answer in a moment, any red flag, is enough to bump a reader out of your script. So Rick, one of the other guys in the writers group, and I suggested using a " prelap" to move up Daniela's line. Here's the thing about prelaps... I love them. I could write a whole script of prelaps. I have no idea who invented them, but I think I first discovered them while reading a Joss Whedon script a few years ago. And since Joss gave us Buffy and Angel, I'm perfectly willing to credit him with inventing the prelap. The crazy thing is-- there's nothing all that special about them... except they do a great job of making a script feel genuinely cinematic, and when used correctly, they add shades of emotional nuance and foreshadowing. Basically, a prelap uses a line of dialogue from one scene to end the scene preceding it, allowing the first scene to flow seamlessly into the second. So here's what Tony did... MR. JACKSON
Sure, sure. Well, see you next
Saturday.
Daniela, precariously balancing her mother-load of hot dogs, shoots Trevor a less than pleased glance.
DANIELA (PRELAP)
You promised you'd meet my dad
next Saturday.
INT. TREVOR'S APARTMENT - NIGHT
The place is totally seventies. Not hip, retro-cool seventies -- but musty, smells like Grandpa, seventies.
Trevor opens the door, pushing aside a pile of mail.
TREVOR
Sorry, I forgot. How bout this --
you invite your dad to come to my
game. Huh? Afterwards, we'll grab
some grub... maybe a beer... maybe
two?Because the second scene's conflict now begins in the first scene, it carries you into the next. The scenes are tied together with the prelap, letting one flow right into the other without bumping the reader. Screenwriting magic! (I know, I know-- I tend to get excited over little things, but come on-- you gotta admit: that's pretty cool.) (Oh, and by the way-- no real comment on Sunday's Oscars. I'm still upset that no one put down The Bourne Ultimatum as a write-in nominee for best picture.) Writing Advice
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:16:06 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 22, 2008
"Oscar Picks" Follow-Up-- Thanks, Becky!
Posted by chad
Fun Stuff
Friday, February 22, 2008 12:20:03 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, February 21, 2008
Chad's Oscar Picks
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- The 80th Academy Awards are barely 72 hours away, so I figured it was time to have the only conversation more divisive than politics: OSCAR CHOICES. I gotta say-- overall, it's a pretty good batch of nominees, although personally, I would've created a new award for "Most Bad-Ass Movie I Could Sit and Watch Forever Without Getting Bored" and given it to The Bourne Ultimatum. I'm lobbying the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences to put that in for next year. Anyway, here are my picks for this year. And-- since we're writers-- I'll start with the two most important categories... Original screenplayWhat I want to win: " Juno" - Diablo CodyWhat I think will win:
" Michael Clayton" - Tony Gilroy (the Academy never votes for comedies... although, to be fair, people love Juno, so we'll see...)
The other nominees: "Lars and the Real Girl" - Nancy Oliver
"Ratatouille" - Brad Bird (story by Jan Pinkava, Jim Capobianco, Brad Bird)
"The Savages" - Tamara Jenkins
What got completely robbed of a nomination: Knocked Up - the smartest, most honest romantic comedy in years (And to all the people who said it was misogynistic: A) you're wrong, and B) so what? Judd Apatow writes more openly and honestly about the pain and fears of masculinity than anyone else out there... and that trumps misogyny. If it was even misogynistic. Which it's not.) What also got robbed of a nomination: Once - okay, maybe this didn't deserve a best "original screenplay" nomination, but it's certainly one of the most perfect examples of a musical-- on stage or screen-- in the last several years.
Adapted screenplayWhat I want to win:
" There Will Be Blood" - Paul Thomas Anderson
What I think will win:
"There Will Be Blood" - Paul Thomas Anderson
(although it could also go to "No Country for Old Men," which would be okay. Both were amazing movies, but "There Will Be Blood" stays with you in a way "No Country" doesn't) The other nominees: "No Country for Old Men" - Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
"Away from Her" - Sarah Polley
"The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Ronald Harwood "Atonement" - Christopher Hampton (Explain something to me... how did this steaming pile of Ambien get nominated for anything? Am I missing something? Do people no longer need romantic chemistry in their love stories? Is clear motivation not a requirement of twenty-first century screenwriting? Have we forgotten about "stakes?" Or are we allowed to forgive an agonizingly dull story as long as we have pretty pictures to look at-- and Kiera Knightley, which, to be fair, does almost forgive the whole thing. But not quite.)
Best motion picture of the yearWhat I want to win:
"There Will Be Blood"
What I think will win: Again, a toss-up between
"There Will Be Blood" and "No Country For Old Men" The other nominees: "Juno" "Michael Clayton" "No Country for Old Men" "There Will Be Blood" "Atonement" Achievement in directingWhat I want to win:
"There Will Be Blood" - Paul Thomas Anderson
What I think will win: Again, a toss-up between
"There Will Be Blood" and "No Country For Old Men" (although to be fair, I think There Will Be Blood is a more challening undertaking for a director) The other nominees: "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Julian Schnabel "Juno" - Jason Reitman "Michael Clayton" - Tony Gilroy Performance by an actor in a leading roleWho I want to win: Daniel Day-Lewis - "There Will Be Blood" Who I think will win: Daniel Day-Lewis - "There Will Be Blood" The other nominees:
Johnny Depp - "Sweeney Todd” George Clooney - "Michael Clayton" Tommy Lee Jones - "In the Valley of Elah" Viggo Mortensen - "Eastern Promises" Who got completely robbed of a nomination: Matt Damon for "The Bourne Ultimatum" (okay, maybe not really-- but if there were an award for "Coolest Ass-Kicker," he'd have it sewn up) Performance by an actress in a leading roleWho I want to win: Laura Linney - "The Savages" (I know it's weird, but I love Laura Linney. She should win everything, as far as I'm concerned. Every movie should just star Laura Linney, playing everything. If she starred in the next Jason Bourne movie, my head might explode.)
Who I think will win: Marion Cotillard - "La Vie en Rose" The other nominees: Julie Christie - "Away from Her" Cate Blanchett - "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" Ellen Page - "Juno" Performance by an actor in a supporting roleWho I want to win: Javier Bardem - "No Country for Old Men" Who I think will win: Javier Bardem - "No Country for Old Men" The other nominees:
Casey Affleck - "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" Philip Seymour Hoffman - "Charlie Wilson's War" Hal Holbrook - "Into the Wild" Tom Wilkinson - "Michael Clayton" Performance by an actress in a supporting roleWho I want to win: Cate Blanchett - "I'm Not There"Who I think will win: Cate Blanchett - "I'm Not There" The other nominees:
Ruby Dee - "American Gangster" Saoirse Ronan - "Atonement" Amy Ryan - "Gone Baby Gone" Tilda Swinton - "Michael Clayton" Best animated feature film of the yearWhat I want to win: " Ratatouille" ( Brad Bird may be one of the smartest, most creative storytellers working today) What I think will win: "Ratatouille" The other nominees:
"Persepolis" "Surf's Up" (ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Did anyone see this movie?!) Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)What I want to win: Jonny Greenwood's score for "There Will Be Blood," which somehow didn't even get a nomination. What do you expect from the same people who keep falling over Atonement? What I think will win: "Atonement" - Dario Marianelli The other nominees:
"The Kite Runner" - Alberto Iglesias "Michael Clayton" - James Newton Howard "Ratatouille" - Michael Giacchino "3:10 to Yuma" - Marco Beltrami Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)What I want to win: " Falling Slowly" from "Once" - Music and Lyric by Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova (if you don't own this CD-- BUY IT. Today.) What I think will win: "Falling Slowly" from "Once" - Music and Lyric by Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova The other nominees:
"Happy Working Song" from "Enchanted" - Music by Alan Menken; Lyric by Stephen Schwartz "Raise It Up" from "August Rush" - Music and Lyric by Jamal Joseph, Charles Mack and Tevin Thomas "So Close" from "Enchanted" - Music by Alan Menken; Lyric by Stephen Schwartz "That's How You Know" from "Enchanted" - Music by Alan Menken; Lyric by Stephen Schwartz Achievement in art directionWhat I want to win: " The Golden Compass" - Art Direction: Dennis Gassner; Set Decoration: Anna PinnockWhat I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Art Direction: Jack Fisk; Set Decoration: Jim EricksonThe other nominees: "American Gangster” - Art Direction: Arthur Max; Set Decoration: Beth A. Rubino "Atonement" – Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer "Sweeney Todd" - Art Direction: Dante Ferretti; Set Decoration: Francesca Lo Schiavo Achievement in cinematographyWhat I want to win: "There Will Be Blood" - Robert ElswitWhat I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Robert Elswit The other nominees: "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" - Roger Deakins "Atonement" - Seamus McGarvey (to be fair, this is the one nomination I think this film deserves; unfortunately, gorgeous pictures don't make a story)"The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Janusz Kaminski "No Country for Old Men" - Roger Deakins Achievement in costume designWhat I want to win: "Across the Universe" - Albert Wolsky What I think will win: "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" - Alexandra Byrne The other nominees: "Atonement" - Jacqueline Durran "La Vie en Rose" - Marit Allen "Sweeney Todd” - Colleen Atwood Achievement in film editingWhat I want to win: "The Bourne Ultimatum" - Christopher Rouse (come on-- if there's one thing this film does deserve, it's every technical award it's up for-- its action scenes and camera work are extraordinary)What I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Dylan Tichenor
The other nominees: "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Juliette Welfling "Into the Wild" - Jay Cassidy "No Country for Old Men" - Roderick Jaynes Achievement in makeupWhat I want to win: " Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" - Ve Neill and Martin SamuelWhat I think will win: "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" - Ve Neill and Martin Samuel The other nominees: "La Vie en Rose" - Didier Lavergne and Jan Archibald "Norbit" - Rick Baker and Kazuhiro Tsuji Achievement in sound editingWhat I want to win: "The Bourne Ultimatum" - Karen Baker Landers and Per Hallberg (this movie was made by its sound... the scene where Jason Bourne chases Desh across the rooftops, and the fisticuffs in the apartment may be my favorite action scene from any movie ever)What I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Christopher Scarabosio and Matthew Wood (although I think the dark horse here could actually be "Transformers") The other nominees: "No Country for Old Men" - Skip Lievsay "Ratatouille" - Randy Thom and Michael Silvers "Transformers" - Ethan Van der Ryn and Mike Hopkins Achievement in sound mixingWhat I want to win: "The Bourne Ultimatum" - Scott Millan, David Parker and Kirk FrancisWhat I think will win: " Transformers" - Kevin O'Connell, Greg P. Russell and Peter J. Devlin
The other nominees: "No Country for Old Men" - Skip Lievsay, Craig Berkey, Greg Orloff and Peter Kurland "Ratatouille" - Randy Thom, Michael Semanick and Doc Kane "3:10 to Yuma" - Paul Massey, David Giammarco and Jim Stuebe Achievement in visual effectsWhat I want to win: "Transformers" - Scott Farrar, Scott Benza, Russell Earl and John FrazierWhat I think will win: "Transformers" - Scott Farrar, Scott Benza, Russell Earl and John Frazier The other nominees:
"The Golden Compass" - Michael Fink, Bill Westenhofer, Ben Morris and Trevor Wood "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" - John Knoll, Hal Hickel, Charles Gibson and John Frazier
Categories I am completely unqualified to comment on, so I'm not going to comment on them:
Best documentary feature Best documentary short subject Best animated short film Best live action short film Best foreign language film Fun Stuff
Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:48:46 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 19, 2008
VIDEO OF THE DAY: Harlan Ellison on Getting Paid as a Writer (oh my God-- I love this!)
Posted by chad
Thanks to Kate at FishbowlLA for finding this video, but OH MY GOD-- IT'S INCREDIBLE. A quick bit of backstory... yesterday, UnitedHollywood.com posted a recently-written-- and fairly pissed off-- response to the WGA-AMPTP deal by sci-fi guru Harlan Ellison. I don't necessarily agree with him, but his passion is AWESOME. Even more awesome is this video from Dreams With Sharp Teeth, a documentary about Ellison himself... maybe you've seen this... and granted, it's a little late now, considering the strike is over and the deal's done-- but if this doesn't make you stand up and go, "Yeah, fight the man!"... well, I don't know what will. It also makes me want to go read more Harlan Ellison. HARLAN ELLISON: PAY THE WRITER Fun Stuff | The Writers Strike 2007
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:19:24 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
Get Ready for Staffing Season (with a great discount)
Posted by chad
Hey, TV writers-- With staffing season ramping up in a matter of weeks ( upfronts have already been announced for May 12-15, which means staffing will begin immediately afterwards), now is the time to whip your TV spec into shape. So I'm teaching another 10-week spec-writing workshop with mediabistro.com, beginning Wednesday, February 27. This is a terrific class for anyone hoping to get staffed this year. Over the course of ten weeks, whether you're writing a Dexter, 30 Rock, The Office, Criminal Minds, or Weeds, you'll take your spec from mere story nugget to fully written script. We'll talk about how to structure your episode, nail your characters' voices, and-- most importantly-- inject your own original voice. And the class ends April 30... just in time for staffing season. And the best part is... Script Notes readers get a $75 dollar discount. Just call Stefanie at mediabistro (310-659-5668) to sign up, and tell her you're a Script Notes reader. Here's some more info, or click HERE to read more at mediabistro.com... WRITING THE TV SPEC SCRIPTWhen: 10 weeks, Wednesdays, February 27 - April 30, 7-10 pm Where: mediabistro.com, 7494 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 303, W. Hollywood, CA 90046 Cost: Originally $610, but tell them you saw the blog, and you get a $75 discount... only $535 To sign up: Call Stefanie at 310-659-5668 For more information: Click here... Events Activities and Things To Do | Writing Advice
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:22:21 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, February 18, 2008
READER QUESTION: Are there any good TV-writing contests?
Posted by chad
Hey, guys-- happy President's Day... I'm not quite sure how we're supposed to celebrate, but hey-- day off, can't complain. Especially because I'm sitting at home, nursing a mild hangover from being at the Magic Castle all night. And I don't care what anyone says: the Magic Castle is the COOLEST PLACE ON EARTH. Saying that, of course, may make me a complete dork, but I don't care-- it's true (the Castle part, not the dork part, which is also probably true). And anyone who denies it hasn't been there or is lying. ANYWAY... after Friday's post about the Scriptapalooza screenwriting contest, I received a couple emails asking if there were any good TV writing contests, so I thought I'd take a minute to give you my thoughts on that. First of all, are there TV writing contests? Yes. Are there any good TV writing contests? That depends on your definition of good. If your definition of a "good" TV writing contest is a contest that rewards its winner with bragging rights, maybe some cash, and hopefully a chance to get their work read or seen by agents, execs, showrunners, etc.-- then YES: there is a tiny handful of TV writing contests (which we'll get to in a second). If your definition of a "good" TV writing contest is a contest that rewards its winner by landing them a staff job or getting their pilot made at a network or studio, then NO: there are no good TV writing contests. And here's why... Movies (and, therefore, movie scripts) are finite pieces of work. A movie lasts two hours, it's over, done. The story will never continue, go on, or repeat itself. (Sure, there are sequels, but most movies aren't written with a sequel already in mind... sequels are created as follow-ups to a proven successful property.) Most movies, by design, are intended to be close-ended experiences. This makes it very easy for producers, studios, or production companies to buy a script from a writer, say "thank you very much," and dispose of the writer. And I'm not saying "dispose of the writer" as a judgement call-- like when we all hear screenwriters complain about how they're treated like crap by the studios (which is often true, but a separate issue). I'm simply saying that once a screenwriter has finished a movie script, his work is done. The script does not go on. (This is one of the reasons we say film is a director-driven medium; while the story begins with the writer, it's really the director who brings it to life and puts his creative stamp on the movie. The director has much more control over the film's vision than the writer.) But this doesn't happen in television. Television shows make mini-movies every week, so they need their writers to stick around. When one script is finished, another must be written. Immediately. Thus, TV is a writer-driven medium... it's the writer or showrunner's vision which drives the show every week. This affects TV in two big ways... 1) It's why TV shows have staffs. One writer couldn't write twenty-two scripts back to back and have them be very good. (I know we read about Aaron Sorkin and David Kelley doing it, but they were clearly subjects in some bizarre genetic experiment that gave them amazing literary superpowers.) (I'm kidding. To be fair, no one knows how those guys do it. Centuries from now, archaeologists will look back and wonder who made Stonehenge, who erected Easter Island, and how the fuck Aaron Sorkin and David Kelley wrote so many scripts.) So writing staffs sit in a room together, for 8-15 hours a day, and write their episodes as a group. 2) It's why studios and networks rarely (and I mean rarely) buy shows and pilots from inexperienced TV writers. Designing a TV show-- and running it successfully-- often takes years of experience, so buyers tend to buy projects only from writers who have proven they can be sucessful TV writers and producers. And neither of these two points is very conducive to winning a contest. Winning a contest might get your script in front of people who could help you get a job-- showrunners, execs, agents, etc.-- but getting hired on a TV staff is about much more than just writing a good script. Being a TV writer is 50% writing talent and 50% personality (and, in the cases of some writers, more like 10%-90%). Thus, most showrunners hire people they already know: writers they've worked with, their own writers assitant, etc. And when they do hire a stranger, they definitely meet with that person-- at least once-- and usually try to recommendations from other people who have worked with them. And winning a contest definitely won't get your pilot picked up or produced as a series. (Of course, never say "definitely," because now that I've said it, it'll happen... but for the most part, I stand by my "definitely"). In fact, the very notion of winning a contest is antithetical to what it takes to develop and run a series. To be totally honest, if you see a contest purporting to give winners their own pilot or TV show: run-- it's probably not legit. Any contest claiming it can give winners their own TV show clearly doesn't have a firm understanding how TV shows are bought and sold. HAVING SAID ALL THIS... should you still apply to TV-writing contests?Sure, why not? What they will give you is... • Something cool to put on your writing resume • A possible open door to execs, agents, and showrunners • Hopefully, a bit of cash • Maybe some constructive feedback • A giant warm fuzzy • Experience writing • Experience getting rejected (which is going to happen to you way more than getting accepted, no matter what level you're at. Even David Kelley and Aaron Sorkin's shows get canceled.) So, here's a short list of TV writing contests that are-- at the very list-- legit. There may be more that I'm missing... if they are, please let me-- and everyone else-- know about them in the comments section below. As for these, I know nothing about the talent pool that applies to them or how successful they are at getting winners through important doors, but they at least aren't criminal fronts: • Writers Digest Screenplay and TV Writing Contest• Austin Film Festival Screenplay & Teleplay Competition• Scriptapalooza International TV Writing Competition• Larry Brody's Spec Scriptacular at TVWriter.com Career Advice | Events Activities and Things To Do | Reader Questions
Monday, February 18, 2008 5:00:10 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 15, 2008
Scriptapalooza Screenwriting Contest 2008
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- Some of you know the Scriptapalooza screenwriting contest, but for those of you who don't-- it's one of the industry's widely respected screenwriting competitions... and its deadline is March 5 (with its final deadline on April 15-- when you'll already be racing to get in your taxes). There are a lot of screenwriting contests out there, but most of them are either bogus or ignored by the industry... but Scriptapalooza is one of the few with street cred. Lifetime films Queen Sized (starring Hairspray leading lady Nikki Blonsky) and The Family Holiday both came from Scriptapalooza winners. And this year, for the first time ever, scripts are emailable to the contest... which is cool both because it's green-- and it saves you money! (Although personally-- every time I save money by being green, I use that money to go to a forest and chop down a tree. Just because I can.) Anyway, it's a good contest. Check it out at www.scriptapalooza.com. Career Advice | Events Activities and Things To Do
Friday, February 15, 2008 1:53:23 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, February 14, 2008
READER QUESTION: Is "Boston Legal" Spec-able?
Posted by chad
So... I got an interesting question yesterday in regards to my post about about this season's spec-able shows. Loyal reader Fig writes in: " Why is it that I've never heard of anyone writing a "Boston Legal" spec? (Or is it just me?)" It's funny, Fig-- when I read your question, my first response was, "Oh, yeah-- Boston Legal-- that must be a spec-able show!" But of all the people I asked... agents, execs, writers... not one of them mentioned Boston Legal. Which is weird, I know, because it's still a pretty popular show, and it seems-- in theory-- that a quirky, standalone show like that should be highly spec-able. But it's not... or, at least, it's not considered a "hot spec." And here, I think, is why... Reason #1) It's old. It's going into its fifth season this year, and most shows have lost their sexy new-kid-on-the-block status by then. And while you probably never want to spec a super-new show like, say, Eli Stone, or Aliens in America, you also don't want to spec something that feels like yesterday's news. And while I never really saw a glut of Boston Legal specs, there was definitely a time-- a few years ago-- when I saw many more than I do now. Which brings me to... Reason #2) For whatever reason-- and maybe this is just my own perception-- Boston Legal has never really felt "cool." Maybe because it was a spinoff of The Practice, which had been around forever, but Boston Legal just never felt like a fresh, new, groundbreaking show... which isn't necessarily fair, because it's very different than The Practice... and it's really good... but still-- it lives in that world, those characters were born on The Practice, and The Practice first premiered eleven years ago. This isn't to knock Boston Legal... I think it's so much better than many people give it credit for... I'm just saying that it has never felt like the show all the kids are watching. Having said all that-- if your heart is pounding to write a Boston Legal, my advice is: write a Boston Legal!While one of the first rules of spec-writing is to write a hot spec that execs, agents, and showrunners are dying to read, the real first rule of spec-writing... or of writing anything... is to write what you're most passionate about. Nothing will show off your true voice better than something your pour your heart into... whether it's this year's hot 30 Rock spec or a radio play about your mother. In other words, brilliant St. Elsewhere spec will get you farther than a mediocre Dexter. Of course, having said all this, it doesn't mean you should just damn the rules, write whatever you want, and expect to get staffed. The rules are there for a reason... every year, there are certain specs people like to read, and certain specs they don't. And the specs people like to read tend to get read first, plain and simple. So the best case scenario for you, as a writer, is to find a story you're deeply passionate about and implant it into one of the hot specs. Could your Boston Legal story work as a Dexter? How about a Mad Men? Maybe even a CSI (which is older than Boston Legal but still, somehow, manages to have a higher "cool factor")? If you can't adapt your story... if you're burning to tell a specific, heartfelt, personal tale that won't work as a Dexter or The Office... then by all means-- tell that story in whatever form it needs to be told, whether it's a spec of L.A. Law, an epic poem, or a stage play in iambic pentameter. Your goal is to rock your reader to his core... and if Boston Legal's the only way to do that, Boston Legal it is. Career Advice | Reader Questions | Writing Advice
Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:56:47 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
|