Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<January 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

Blogroll




# Thursday, January 29, 2009
WEBSITE OF THE DAY: The Write Environment
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

Props to Andrew, who steered me toward an interesting website: The Write Environment.  Founded by screenwriter Jeffrey Berman, The Write Environment is actually a series of interviews, conducted by Berman, with some of today's top TV and film writers, including Joss Whedon (Buffy, Angel, Dollhouse), Damon Lindelof (Lost), Tim Kring (Heroes, Crossing Jordan), and Doug Ellin (Entourage). 

Berman posts clips of the interviews on the website, and you can watch the whole of each interview by buying a DVD for $12.95.  I don't know if you'll want to toss down 13 bucks for any of these, but even just watching the clips is a lot of fun...


Books Tools Resources | Digital Media and Web Series | Fun Stuff
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:13:18 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Friday, January 23, 2009
BOOK REVIEW: Master Shots
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys—

Wanted to take a few moments today to recommend a really interesting book I’ve been perusing over the past few days… Christopher Kenworthy’s “Master Shots: 100 Advanced Camera Techniques to Get an Expensive Look on Your Low-Budget Movie.”  It’s brand-new… just hit shelves at the beginning of this month… and it’s a great book for anyone about to shoot their first movie (or second or third, really).

The book is a simple, straightforward, practical guide to how to film effective shots, how and why those shots work emotionally and visually, and when to se them in a film.  This book doesn’t pussyfoot around with film theory or history or gushy tangents; it’s a no-bullshit approach to learning how to execute certain and specific moves.

The book works very simply in two-page chunks…

The first page usually contains three pictures: 1) a screen grab from a familiar movie like “The Bourne Identity” or “Sideways”; 2) an illustrated recreation of the scene using arrows to show how the camera moved to create the shot in the screen grab; and 3) an illustration showing how the same technique could be used in a new way.

The second page details, in text, how the shot works, what it accomplishes narratively/emotionally/visually, how to successfully execute it, and how to use it in a movie.

Kenworthy also arranges his book smartly, organizing his shots into easy-to-find-and-use chapters such as “Fight Scenes,” “Car Scenes,” “Revelations & Discovery,” “Shock Horror,” etc.  Each chapter than has 7 to 10 shots.  “Love & Sex Scenes,” for instance, has “Eye Contact,” “First Contact,” “Kiss Angles,” “Facing Up,” etc.

So if you’re a first-time director—or a director stuck on a particular sequence—trying to figure out how to shoot, say, a scene where a policeman is chasing a robber through a dark woods or a bustling city street, you could simply turn to the chapter titled, “Chase Scenes,” and find ten helpful shots used to bring chases to life (“Travel with Subject,” “Long Lens Pan,” “The Unseen Attacker,” etc.)  You’d then find, in simple and succinct terms, explanations, photos, and illustrations guiding you through each shot.

(In fact, the weakest part of the book is probably the illustrations and recreations.  Maybe I’m just not used to thinking like a director, but even with the arrows they were sometimes hard to follow.  I found myself wondering how much more effective the book would be with an accompanying DVD or website where you could watch the actual clips, look at moving shots or recreations, etc.  Having said that, it’s still a damn helpful and practical book.)  (But if you read this, Christopher Kenworthy, you should think about putting up a website… much like Ric Viers’ “The Sound Effects Bible” and its corresponding website: www.soundeffectsbible.com – a great filmmaking and educational resource!)

Although Kenworthy is clearly speaking to directors, I was fascinated from the book’s first page because it’s such a clear, uncluttered glimpse into the head of a DP or director.  I ALWAYS think it’s helpful, as a writer, to learn other artists’ creative processes, but this was fascinating in its own right simply because Kenworthy does such a great job of explaining the shots and why they work.

In Chapter Three (“Entrances and Exits”), for instance, Kenworthy talks about a shot he calls the “Window Push.”  Here’s what he writes…

“In these frames from ‘Amelie,’ a simple combination of effects creates the correct emotion, without it looking like a technique at all.  The camera moves towards the windows, as they are closed, and then the character walks out of the shot and turns out the light.  It’s the combination of these factors that makes this work.  When a camera dollies forward, we get the feeling we’re going to see something new, so when the character walks out of the dolly shot and leaves a dark window, it creates the surprising feeling of closure.  It breaks expectations.  Equally, if the window was already closed, or the light already out, the effect would not be as powerful.”

It’s a ridiculously simple shot… and the pictures help illustrate it… but Kenworthy is totally right. And these are the types of straight-arrow, bare-bones lessons and tips the book offers.

You may not consciously think about how this little shot works as you’re watching the movie, but as a director, it’s a great technique to use and understand.  And as a writer, it helps you both understand directors’ processes AND think about your own work… interesting ways to end scenes, reveal characters, etc.

I’ve never directed a movie, but if I were about to, I would certainly keep this book on my desk.  If not to help me plan my entire shotlist, at least to double check it… to make sure I was covering my bases and using shots appropriately.  So take heart, nervous first-time directors… thanks to Christopher Kenworthy—you have a friend.


Books Tools Resources
Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 23, 2009 10:00:09 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Thursday, January 22, 2009
Great WGA News... including a big meeting (and free dinner)
Posted by Chad

First of all, some exciting news on the reality TV front...

Two important class-action lawsuits were settled today, surprising everyone in the TV industry.  These class-action lawsuits were filed four years ago by the Writers Guild and hundreds of reality TV writers and producers claiming production companies and TV networks (including ABC, CBS, and FOX) had cheated them out of overtime, forced them to falsify time cards, and required them to work in inhumane conditions.  These weren't just little writers and producers on little shows, these were major network programs like "The Bachelor," "The Real Gilligan's Island," and "Trading Spouses." ...So this is a HUGE victory not only for people working in reality TV, but for writers demanding fair treatment and equitable pay in every genre or medium (like animation, game shows, sketch and comedy shows... many of which STILL aren't covered by union contracts)!

(And I'll be honest, as much as I support the WGA and their campaign to organize reality... I was totally skeptical they would win this.  I think the Guild has made some huge missteps in their organizing campaign over the last few years; fortunately, they seem to have gotten back on track in the last couple months, and I think this is a huge shot of adrenaline... at least for me.)

Secondly... the battle ain't over-- yet.  There's still a LONG way to go before completely bringing reality writers and producers into the union's fold, but the WGA is hosting a meeting tomorrow to get writers, producers, and supporters up to speed.  You don't have to be working on a TV show in order to come... you just have to be a writer-- or someone who supports writers' causes.  (Plus, they provide free dinner... and hey-- who can pass that up?)

Here's the scoop...

WHEN:  Thursday, January 22, 8 pm.
WHERE:  The Writers Guild, 7000 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA 90048
RSVP:  talbert@wga.org

Hope to see you there!




Industry Updates | Reality TV
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:40:56 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Wednesday, January 21, 2009
VIDEO OF THE DAY: "Benjamin Gump"
Posted by Chad

Hey, movie fans--

I haven't actually seen The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, but thanks to this video... you won't need to!  Props to Rick for sending this over.  Check it out... hilarious!  (I especially loved it because I find Forrest Gump one of the most over-rated movies ever... although it has a great soundtrack-- the best part of the movie)


BENJAMIN GUMP


Digital Media and Web Series | Fun Stuff
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:05:17 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [2]
READER QUESTION: Can a TV Spec Go To New & Different Locations?
Posted by Chad

Today’s reader question comes from Erica, who writes…

“When it comes to a TV spec, do you have to try and stay on the normal sets or can you branch out?  For instance, on How I Met Your Mother, they tend to go to other places, like restaurants or the mall. But they've had several episodes that stick to just the bar and their apartments. Just curious what the rule of thumb is.”

This is a great question, Erica, and one that many writers often wrestle with.

When writing a TV spec, you obviously want to make sure you have your main characters on their primary sets for at least some (and maybe most) of the story.  But I definitely think it’s okay to go to some new places… as long as they seem true to the world and tone of the show.

For example, let’s say you’re writing a “30 Rock” story in which Liz Lemon joins a Big Sister program and “adopts” an underprivileged child.  That seems like a likely enough “30 Rock” story, and in the context of that story, it’s very plausible that you might write a scene or two where Liz goes to the little girl’s house or neighborhood.

Similarly, perhaps you’re writing a spec for “The Big Bang Theory” in which Leonard and Sheldon pick up some nerdy girls at a technology convention.  You’d probably want some scenes on the floor of the convention… and you may even have a scene or two in a hotel room.

In these cases, it’s totally okay for you to leave the traditional sets of the show… just as most regular episodes often have a few scenes shot on “guest sets” (like when Michael Scott goes to Chili’s or the doctors on "Grey’s Anatomy" visit someone else’s house or hospital).

What you would NOT want to do is tell a story that seems so outlandish it forces you to go to ridiculous places.  You wouldn’t write a “House” spec, for instance, that sends Dr. House to the moon, requiring you to have sets of a spaceship or lunar modules.  And you probably wouldn’t write an “Ugly Betty” script where a job assignment sends Betty to Antarctica.

So, in short, it’s less about sending your characters to believable locations, and more about telling stories that seem tonally plausible for the show.

Having said all this… sometimes people write “novelty specs,” or spec scripts that are clearly playing with the format of their show—usually in some clever, splashy way.  I.e., a few years ago, a writing team wrote a spec script for Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen’s sitcom (I think it was “Two of a Kind”).  The spec was titled “Mary Kate Misses First Period,” and it was the raunchy, inappropriate story of how Ashley got her first period… but Mary Kate didn’t—and then it turned out she was pregnant.  The story was raw, vulgar, and totally inappropriate… but it also landed the writers a ton of meetings and eventually a writing job.

In those cases, it’s okay to venture beyond the bounds of the show; in fact, you have to.  Writing a novelty spec, however, can be risky.  If you do an amazing job, it can garner a lot of attention.  If you do a poor job, you look silly and foolish.

I remember reading a novelty spec for “Taxi” a few years ago… where the taxi kept picking up characters from different sitcoms—Jerry and Elaine from “Seinfeld,” Will and Grace, maybe some folks from “Cheers” or “Murphy Brown.”  I don’t remember the specifics… all I remember is: it wasn’t very funny.  The story itself was gimmicky and none the characters' voices seemed right... any everyone who read it knew is.  So while it may have been a noble idea, it just made the writer seem desperate and hacky.

Anyway, I hope this helps, Erica… and for the rest of you with questions, please feel free to post them in the comments section or email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.

In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great stuff coming up: more reader questions, Pitch Workshop submissions, book and movie reviews, and—in a few days—our first bona fide writing contest!!


Reader Questions | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:10:47 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Monday, January 19, 2009
Joss Whedon's Writing Tips
Posted by Chad

Special thanks to Brian Klems for finding this awesome piece with Joss Whedon's top ten writing rules (compliments of Catherine Bray, 4Talent magazine, and Danny Stack).  I found this super-helpful... especially the first one, which-- quite honestly-- is a HUGE problem of mine.

Anyway, happy MLK Day, and click HERE enjoy some sage advice from Joss!


Fun Stuff | Writing Advice
Bookmark and Share
Monday, January 19, 2009 11:14:34 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Friday, January 16, 2009
Party Pics... Better Late Than Never
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks--

Sorry these are late, but we finally got some of the photos from last month's book party for Small Screen, Big Picture: A Writer's Guide to the TV Business , at the Standard Hotel in Hollywood, up on the Mediabistro website!  Click HERE to check 'em out... hope you enjoy!

Also, the book's been getting some terrific reviews, so I just wanted to share a couple with you... (I know this is kinda shameless self-promotion, but I'm excited, so I just wanted to put them up here...)

Booklist (the magazine of the American Library Association) -

Booklistreview.jpg (955.55 KB)

The Writer -

Writerreview.pdf (1.72 MB)


Fun Stuff
Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 16, 2009 6:05:28 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, January 15, 2009
MOVIE TALK: Paul Blart: Mall Cop
Posted by Chad

Paul Blart: Mall Cop (opening tomorrow night) is silly, stupid, juvenile, riddled with logic holes, and rarely hilarious… yet, somehow, surprisingly endearing.

Written by star Kevin James and “King of Queens” writer Nick Bakay, the family-friendly (especially if that family is mostly boys) story follows Paul Blart (James), an overweight, hypoglycemic police academy flunkie now working as a mall cop at a New Jersey shopping center.  Blart’s life has turned out NOTHING like he’d hoped or expected; aside from failing to make the police force, his wife—an illegal immigrant—ditched him and their chubby tween daughter, Maya (Raini Rodriguez) as soon as she gained citizenship… he and Maya live with his mother… he has no real friends… his dating life is non-existent… and his entire life revolves around an almost obsessive determination to be a dutiful security guard “protecting the people” of his mall.

But all that changes one fateful day… when the mall is taken over by a team of skateboarding, bike-riding burglars intent on robbing the local bank and executing a massive credit card scam before escaping to the Cayman Islands.  Unfortunately, Blart—who has succumbed to a brief moment of weakness and decided to play video games while on duty—isn’t around when the burglars evacuate the mall (he has locked himself in the video arcade), so he’s suddenly the only survivor free in the mall.  Thus, it’s up to him to stop the bad guys and rescue the hostages… which include his crush, Amy (the ridiculously adorable Jayma Mays), and—eventually—his daughter Maya.

What follows is a predictable, paint-by-numbers spoof of ‘80’s action movies… mostly “Die Hard,” but with a bit of “Rambo,” “First Blood,” “Heathers,” and others thrown in for good measure.  It also has a healthy dose of the robbers’ extreme sports stunts (why these guys are extreme sportsmen is beyond me… they literally skateboard and bike through the entire mall) and Kevin James’ chubby-guy schtick (watching James try to sneak through the mall like a commando, goofy fight scenes, etc.)… which, frankly, serves as a nice reminder that watching fat guys do physical comedy is—no matter how much you wanna resist or deny it—ALWAYS funny.

I’m not even going to lay out the rest of the plot, because—to be honest—it’s so paint-by-numbers that you can see the entire movie simply by closing your eyes.

But here’s the thing…

I found myself genuinely liking it.

As I said to my wife afterwards… “it’s not all that funny… and a lot of it is pretty stupid (i.e., a scene where James is trapped in an aluminum air-conditioning duct and the bad guys find him because his grumbling stomach echoes through the duct)… but everything about it is just so LIKEABLE.”

Basically, the movie “succeeds” on three main points:

POINT #1:  You can’t help but like Kevin James and Jayma Mays.  James is a great at earning sympathy points for being the schlubby nice guy who never gets a break.  And Jayma Mays does “adorable” better than anyone out there.  (Seriously. If you wrote a movie and just named a character “Adorable,” she would automatically get the role.  They wouldn’t even audition anyone else.)

POINT #2 (and this is the biggie):  While the script never takes itself too seriously, its treatment of the main character, Paul Blart, is earnest.  The first third of the movie is spent setting up Paul Blart’s desperate wants… and the strong emotional drives behind them.

First, we see how badly this man wants to be a protector of citizens.  The film opens with Blart racing to finish his final police academy exam… and he’s clearly the start student, acing every test, until—inches from the finish line—he passes out from hypoglycemia.  We then see him in his fallback job as a security officer, where he takes his job so seriously he gives wheelchaired shoppers tickets for “reckless driving,” talks in police lingo over his walkie-talkie, and attempts to make citizens arrest on two women bickering over a bra in Victoria’s Secret.  It’s silly, sure… but it does a great job of illustrating, in visual and dramatic ways, just how much this guy believes in himself and what he’s doing.

Secondly, we see how desperately Blart longs to find a new wife.  His love for Maya and his mom is palpable… and he clearly has a lot more love to give, but no one to share it with.  (He even bears no hard feelings to the ex-wife who used and left him.)  Even Maya and his mother want him to find someone, making us hurt for him in a superbly relatable way.

(Also, James never mugs or lets his performance talk down to the audience, which is nice—and helps him win all those sympathy points.  You genuinely feel for him.)

(Another “also” – at one point, there’s a line which I LOVE… not because it’s a brilliant or beautiful line, but because it “works” so perfectly.  Blart’s daughter, Maya, reminds him that he once said to her: “If I don’t have a girlfriend by November, I’ll let you sign me up for PerfectMatch.com.”  (This line reminds me of a similar line from “The Wedding Singer,” when Robbie—the Adam Sandler character—is giving music lessons to Rosie—an old woman—and she says, “If I can learn to sing this song perfectly for my anniversary, my husband will know how much I still love him.”

I love these lines because they perfectly set up everything their stories require to work.  They give characters specific and tangible wants: Blart wants a girlfriend; Rosie wants to sing the song.  They root these tangible wants in genuine emotional motivation: Blart wants to find love, Rosie wants to let her husband know how much she still cares.  They lay out what these characters need to do in order accomplish those wants: begin dating, and learn to sing.  They give characters’ wants real stakes: if he fails Blart will have to do sign up for an online dating service (which he clearly doesn’t want to do), and Rosie’s husband won’t know how much she cares.  And lastly, they give the characters real deadlines: November, and Rosie’s anniversary.

So in each of these sentences, an entire story is set in motion.  The stories may not be as weighty as, say, “Slumdog Millionaire” or “Revolutionary Road,” but so what?  Simple sentences like these give us all the info we need to relate to and root for the characters.)

Ultimately, because the storytellers don’t mock or belittle Blart—even though he’s the movie’s comedic engine—he’s relatable enough that we care about and invest in his mission (or, at the very least, we understand and relate to it).  And because we care, we're willing to forgive other missteps.

POINT #3:  Any movie’s pretty good if the director shamelessly blasts old Survivor songs throughout… and it’s hard not to like something with “The Search is Over” cranked through a great sound system.  (I think “High on You” was a bigger hit, but let’s be honest… “The Search is Over” just SAYS so much more.)  And when the soundtrack is backed up with REO Speedwagon, Bon Jovi, and KISS… DONE.  Hand this thing a “Best PictureOscar and let’s call it a day.

So… today’s takeaway screenwriting lesson is—what?  I think, if anything, it’s that much of our battle as storytellers is simply getting audiences to care about and invest in our characters.  If we can accomplish that successfully, they’ll stick with us through almost anything.

Having said that… “Paul Blart: Mall Cop” is certainly no cinematic masterpiece.  And between my wife and most of the critics out there (Rotten Tomatoes is giving it a sad 30% rating right now), I’m clearly in the minority.  Oh well.  It’s still got Jayma Mays, and maybe that’s enough for me.


PAUL BLART: MALL COP TRAILER




SURVIVOR'S "THE SEARCH IS OVER" VIDEO



Movie Talk
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:28:24 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Tuesday, January 13, 2009
READER QUESTION: How Much Info About Future Episodes Should I Include with My Spec Pilot?
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Today’s reader question comes from Merik, who writes…

“I have been writing my second feature script and I am half way through. As I got to page 60, I realized that this script would make a great cable (HBO) pilot, and would make a great series. I have read some of your Script Notes, which have clarified that my script does meet the Pilot standard. With that being said, should I complete the first few episodes before giving it to my lawyer to reach out to HBO...?  I know where it would go, but… what is expected of me when trying to sell a pilot script that is complete?  How much do I need to have thought through, and how many episodes should I write before trying to reach out to HBO and sell the series...?”

Well, first of all, Merik—thanks so much for reading Script Notes, and I’m glad you’ve found it helpful!

As for how much of the future series to pitch or write, the general rule is: NOT MUCH... and JUST ENOUGH. 

Allow me to clarify...

Very often, when pitching a TV show, it’s hurtful to the pitch and the project’s sale-ability to have too many of the subsequent episodes set in stone.  Network execs—even at writer-friendly HBO—like to have input into where a series is headed and how it develops.  This isn’t because they’re controlling or myopic, it’s because they hopefully know or have a sense of what works best (and what doesn’t) for their network.

Also, series rarely play out the way you may plan or anticipate.  No matter how brilliant you think your future episodes and stories may be, I can almost guarantee that—when it’s all said and done—they won’t actually happen the way you envision them.  This is because new series are so tender, and there are so many unpredictable variables, that it’s always hard to execute your vision just as you see it.  The first several episodes of any TV series are often experiments, with writers, actors, and directors trying various things to see what works, and series often take on a life of their own.  

I’m not saying this to discourage you from thinking about where your series is headed.  You should ABSOLUTELY think about where your story is headed… because at some point, if the network likes your script, they ARE going to want to talk about where you see it going.  I’m simply saying you want to be strategic in what you present and how you present it, because networks don’t want to think you’re locked into something that may not ultimately come to fruition.  TV shows are fluid and evolving, and networks want (and need) to work with people who can adapt quickly.

So what do you do?...  

Some writers include short paragraphs (maybe five to ten) summarizing “sample” story ideas, the kinds of stories the should could tell.  If you’d like to include with those stories your vision for the future of the series… go for it!

Other writers let the pilot stand on its own and wait for the network to ask for future story ideas later (which, if they like the pilot script, they always do).

Basically, whenever and however you feel it's most appropriate, the idea is to let networks know where the series COULD go... the kinds of stories you see it telling... without saying "this is where my series WILL or MUST go."

So my advice…?

If you’re basically submitting this pilot cold and unsolicited, even through a lawyer, go ahead and include some extra story ideas.  It can’t hurt… and you’re only going to get one shot to impress your readers—so hit them with everything you’ve got.  (But again—keep the stories very short… and only send in a page or two total.)

The one thing I would absolutely NOT do is write extra scripts.  They will NEVER get read.  And—honestly?—they’ll probably make you come across as over-eager and naïve, not knowing how the TV development process works… and that will be a turnoff.  (After all, nothing is more set in stone than an actual script.)

(Also, a hint: many people say—especially with sitcoms or character-driven shows—that the first several episodes are simply the pilot revisited.  This doesn’t mean you should repeat the pilot exactly, it simply means that as the show struggles to get on its feet, you spend the first few episodes re-examining and reinforcing the core cast’s central relationships and conflicts.  This not only helps buttress the show’s main relationships, it helps audiences, producers, writers, and execs understand what kinds of stories this show tells, how it works narratively and tonally.)

Anyway, Merik, I hope this helps… and let me know what happens!

For the rest of you, if you have thoughts, comments, criticisms, or your own questions, please feel free to post them in the comments section below… or email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.


Pitching | Reader Questions | Writing TV
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:59:43 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Monday, January 12, 2009
READER QUESTION: I'm looking for a specific movie script...
Posted by Chad

Today's reader question comes from Safeena, who writes:

"Do you by any chance have the full script of Under the Same Moon? I wanted to perform an interpretation for a speech competition, but I can't find it anywhere."

Unfortunately, Safeena, I don't have that particular script (although I loved the movie), but I can refer you to some great websites that have free or for-sale screenplays.  I can't guarantee they'll have that particular script, but it's worth a shot.  Try one of these...

Simply Scripts
Script City
Internet Movie Script Database
Daily Script
Drew's Script-o-Rama


If none of those comes through, you can always try going through the writer's agent and seeing if he/she will send you a script.  Here's how to do that...

•  Go to the "find a writer" page of the Writers Guild's website (click HERE)

•  Enter the name of the screenwriter (Ligiah Villalobos)

•  The WGA database will give you the name of the writer's agent and agency (Ligiah is represented at CAA)

•  Call the agent, or write them a letter if you prefer, explaining exactly who you are and what you'd like

Some agents are very cool about helping with stuff like this-- especially if it's for non-profit or educational purposes-- others aren't cool at all.  I'm guessing/hoping that if you're using the speech for a school competition, they'd be helpful, but I don't know.

Another thing you can do...

Simply rent or buy the movie and transcribe the speech you want... which, honestly, may be the fastest and easiest way to go.

Hope that helps!

Chad

UPDATE (6:26 p.m., 1/12/09):
Huge thanks to Ligiah Villalobos, screenwriter of Under the Same Moon, who spotted Safeena's question on this morning's blog post and took the time to respond!  Thank you so much for reading and helping, Ligiah!  Here's Ligiah's response...

Hi, I'm the writer of Under the Same Moon. I saw this request so I thought I would reach out to you. I believe she/he can get a copy of my script through the WGA Library because I did give them a copy of it. Hope that helps.

Ligiah Villalobos
Writer/Executive Producer
"La Misma Luna" (Under the Same Moon)


Safeena-- if you're in Los Angeles, the Writers Guild Library is indeed an INCREDIBLE resource.  They have on file almost every script for every produced TV episode or movie in history... modern blockbusters, classics, indie films, you name it.  And it's free to use... even to non-WGA members!  In fact, even if you're not looking for a script, it's a wonderful place to go sit, read, and feel very literary.


Books Tools Resources | Reader Questions
Bookmark and Share
Monday, January 12, 2009 7:10:23 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [2]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links