Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| February, 2010 (1) |
| January, 2010 (5) |
| December, 2009 (8) |
| November, 2009 (7) |
| October, 2009 (8) |
| September, 2009 (16) |
| August, 2009 (10) |
| July, 2009 (11) |
| June, 2009 (14) |
| May, 2009 (17) |
| April, 2009 (8) |
| March, 2009 (13) |
| February, 2009 (16) |
| January, 2009 (15) |
| December, 2008 (14) |
| November, 2008 (16) |
| October, 2008 (20) |
| September, 2008 (14) |
| August, 2008 (15) |
| July, 2008 (13) |
| June, 2008 (7) |
| May, 2008 (10) |
| April, 2008 (13) |
| March, 2008 (16) |
| February, 2008 (22) |
| January, 2008 (42) |
| December, 2007 (24) |
| November, 2007 (40) |
| October, 2007 (1) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | | 28 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
Blogroll
|
 Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Writing the Reality TV Show - Monday night!
Posted by chad
Hey, TV writers and producers-- If you're in L.A. and interested in knowing how to develop and sell the next Dancing with the Stars or Millionaire Matchmaker, I'm teaching a 3-hour reality TV seminar at mediabistro.com this Monday night, and I'd love to see you there! Here's the scoop... WRITING THE REALITY TV SHOWWhen: Monday, March 3, 7-10 pm Where: mediabistro.com, 7494 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 303, W. Hollywood, CA 90046 Cost: $65 To sign up: Call Stefanie at 310-659-5668 or click HERE
Check out this webpage for more information... or here's the little blurb about it... American Idol. Deal or No Deal. My Super Sweet 16. From the
multi-million-dollar series of broadcast television to the low-budget
niche shows of cable, reality programming dominates television. But are
reality shows really "reality?" How much planning and production goes
into unscripted storytelling? And, most importantly, how can you get in
on the action?
This seminar lays the groundwork for anyone wanting to break into
the lucrative world of reality TV. We'll look at various types of
reality shows and what makes them tick, from docu-dramas and docu-soaps
(Rob & Big, Laguna Beach) to game shows and elimination-style competitions (Hell's Kitchen, Survivor) to personality-driven and "aspirational" series (Tasty Travels, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition).
We'll then discuss how to conceive, develop, and sell your idea.
What are the critical elements of a pitch? Should you attach talent?
Does your series work as a strip? We'll explore how to structure your
reality pitch and get it to the right people. Who are the major
players? When should you attach a senior producer? What networks are
best for your concept? Whether you're a writer, producer, or host,
reality television's waiting for you.
In this seminar, you will learn:
- The difference between reality shows, and how to pitch them accordingly
- The critical elements every reality show and pitch must have
- How to structure a pitch both verbally and as a written document
- How to pitch to networks, studios, and production companies
- When to attach hosts or producers to your idea, and when not to
- What to expect when you're making your pitch, and what happens when you leave
Events Activities and Things To Do
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:22:04 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
The WGA Ratifies Its New Deal
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- Half an hour ago, the Writers Guild of America announced that membership had voted to ratify the new AMPTP contract, putting an official end to the tumult and negotiations that had caused the 100-day writers strike. Here's the official email from the WGA... "To Our Fellow Members: Today, it is our pleasure to inform you that members of the Writers Guilds of America, East and West, have voted to ratify the MBA contract with 93.6% approval. With a total of 4,060 votes cast, the tally was 3,802 to 258. These numbers reaffirm the tremendous level of support and commitment our membership has continuously demonstrated over these last few crucial months. We are also pleased to report that the trustees of our health fund voted yesterday to follow the recommendation in our strike settlement agreement to provide additional coverage and an extension of the earnings cycle for a full quarter (three months) to participants who would otherwise lose health coverage following an earnings cycle that included all or a portion of the strike period. Participants whose health coverage is paid for by points will only be charged points if they have ten or more points as of April 1, 2008. As we close this chapter in our union's history, what we together have accomplished should not be underestimated. The 2008 MBA establishes a beachhead on the Internet and in new media that will guarantee our share of a potentially vast and bountiful future. Writers already are working on new media projects under this agreement and residuals must now be paid for streaming and downloads of our library of films and TV shows. Language in the contract will allow us to monitor and audit these new technologies and new business models, but it will take vigilance on the part of our membership to make sure that original Internet writing is done under a WGA contract and with appropriate terms and conditions. The same sort of vigilance will be needed to assist members of SAG and AFTRA. They are about to go through a similar process to the one we experienced. Their support of our cause was invaluable. We must use all our efforts and experience to support them as well. Further gains that they can achieve will have an immediate, positive effect on our contract. We must take our newfound spirit and unity and use it to move our two unions forward. We look to the future and our newly revitalized member engagement to reaffirm writers as the first among equals in the most collaborative art form in history. As the last few weeks proved once and for all, we are all in this together. Best, Patric M. Verrone President, WGAW Michael Winship President, WGAE" Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:33:27 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 26, 2008
TIP OF THE DAY: The Magic of the Prelap
Posted by chad
Someone once told me that if you hear something three times, it means the universe is sending you a message. Well, I haven't heard this three times yet, but a question came up in my writers group last week... and then I got an email yesterday asking almost the exact same question. And since I was never good with numbers, I figure two times is as good as three. So here ya go... In my writers group, my friend Tony-- an up-and-coming screenwriter who optioned his first script last year-- was working on a new project and having trouble tying two scenes together. Here, take a look... MR. JACKSON Sure, sure. Well, see you next Saturday.
Daniela, precariously balancing her mother-load of hot dogs, shoots Trevor a less than pleased glance. (The problem was: we see Daniela's "less-than-pleased glance" here...)
INT. TREVOR'S APARTMENT - NIGHT
The place is totally seventies. Not hip, retro-cool seventies -- but musty, smells like Grandpa, seventies.
Trevor opens the door, pushing aside a pile of mail.
DANIELA Trevor, you promised you'd meet my dad next Saturday. (...but don't get an answer till here about what she's less-than-pleased about.)
TREVOR Sorry, I forgot. How bout this -- you invite your dad to come to my game. Huh? Afterwards, we'll grab some grub... maybe a beer... maybe two?
Although there isn't a huge amount of time between Daniela's "less than pleased" glance and the line that explains the glance, there's enough time that readers were saying, "Wait-- what? Why is she less-than-pleased? Did I miss something?" And even though they get their answer in a moment, any red flag, is enough to bump a reader out of your script. So Rick, one of the other guys in the writers group, and I suggested using a " prelap" to move up Daniela's line. Here's the thing about prelaps... I love them. I could write a whole script of prelaps. I have no idea who invented them, but I think I first discovered them while reading a Joss Whedon script a few years ago. And since Joss gave us Buffy and Angel, I'm perfectly willing to credit him with inventing the prelap. The crazy thing is-- there's nothing all that special about them... except they do a great job of making a script feel genuinely cinematic, and when used correctly, they add shades of emotional nuance and foreshadowing. Basically, a prelap uses a line of dialogue from one scene to end the scene preceding it, allowing the first scene to flow seamlessly into the second. So here's what Tony did... MR. JACKSON
Sure, sure. Well, see you next
Saturday.
Daniela, precariously balancing her mother-load of hot dogs, shoots Trevor a less than pleased glance.
DANIELA (PRELAP)
You promised you'd meet my dad
next Saturday.
INT. TREVOR'S APARTMENT - NIGHT
The place is totally seventies. Not hip, retro-cool seventies -- but musty, smells like Grandpa, seventies.
Trevor opens the door, pushing aside a pile of mail.
TREVOR
Sorry, I forgot. How bout this --
you invite your dad to come to my
game. Huh? Afterwards, we'll grab
some grub... maybe a beer... maybe
two?Because the second scene's conflict now begins in the first scene, it carries you into the next. The scenes are tied together with the prelap, letting one flow right into the other without bumping the reader. Screenwriting magic! (I know, I know-- I tend to get excited over little things, but come on-- you gotta admit: that's pretty cool.) (Oh, and by the way-- no real comment on Sunday's Oscars. I'm still upset that no one put down The Bourne Ultimatum as a write-in nominee for best picture.) Writing Advice
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:16:06 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 22, 2008
"Oscar Picks" Follow-Up-- Thanks, Becky!
Posted by chad
Fun Stuff
Friday, February 22, 2008 12:20:03 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, February 21, 2008
Chad's Oscar Picks
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- The 80th Academy Awards are barely 72 hours away, so I figured it was time to have the only conversation more divisive than politics: OSCAR CHOICES. I gotta say-- overall, it's a pretty good batch of nominees, although personally, I would've created a new award for "Most Bad-Ass Movie I Could Sit and Watch Forever Without Getting Bored" and given it to The Bourne Ultimatum. I'm lobbying the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences to put that in for next year. Anyway, here are my picks for this year. And-- since we're writers-- I'll start with the two most important categories... Original screenplayWhat I want to win: " Juno" - Diablo CodyWhat I think will win:
" Michael Clayton" - Tony Gilroy (the Academy never votes for comedies... although, to be fair, people love Juno, so we'll see...)
The other nominees: "Lars and the Real Girl" - Nancy Oliver
"Ratatouille" - Brad Bird (story by Jan Pinkava, Jim Capobianco, Brad Bird)
"The Savages" - Tamara Jenkins
What got completely robbed of a nomination: Knocked Up - the smartest, most honest romantic comedy in years (And to all the people who said it was misogynistic: A) you're wrong, and B) so what? Judd Apatow writes more openly and honestly about the pain and fears of masculinity than anyone else out there... and that trumps misogyny. If it was even misogynistic. Which it's not.) What also got robbed of a nomination: Once - okay, maybe this didn't deserve a best "original screenplay" nomination, but it's certainly one of the most perfect examples of a musical-- on stage or screen-- in the last several years.
Adapted screenplayWhat I want to win:
" There Will Be Blood" - Paul Thomas Anderson
What I think will win:
"There Will Be Blood" - Paul Thomas Anderson
(although it could also go to "No Country for Old Men," which would be okay. Both were amazing movies, but "There Will Be Blood" stays with you in a way "No Country" doesn't) The other nominees: "No Country for Old Men" - Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
"Away from Her" - Sarah Polley
"The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Ronald Harwood "Atonement" - Christopher Hampton (Explain something to me... how did this steaming pile of Ambien get nominated for anything? Am I missing something? Do people no longer need romantic chemistry in their love stories? Is clear motivation not a requirement of twenty-first century screenwriting? Have we forgotten about "stakes?" Or are we allowed to forgive an agonizingly dull story as long as we have pretty pictures to look at-- and Kiera Knightley, which, to be fair, does almost forgive the whole thing. But not quite.)
Best motion picture of the yearWhat I want to win:
"There Will Be Blood"
What I think will win: Again, a toss-up between
"There Will Be Blood" and "No Country For Old Men" The other nominees: "Juno" "Michael Clayton" "No Country for Old Men" "There Will Be Blood" "Atonement" Achievement in directingWhat I want to win:
"There Will Be Blood" - Paul Thomas Anderson
What I think will win: Again, a toss-up between
"There Will Be Blood" and "No Country For Old Men" (although to be fair, I think There Will Be Blood is a more challening undertaking for a director) The other nominees: "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Julian Schnabel "Juno" - Jason Reitman "Michael Clayton" - Tony Gilroy Performance by an actor in a leading roleWho I want to win: Daniel Day-Lewis - "There Will Be Blood" Who I think will win: Daniel Day-Lewis - "There Will Be Blood" The other nominees:
Johnny Depp - "Sweeney Todd” George Clooney - "Michael Clayton" Tommy Lee Jones - "In the Valley of Elah" Viggo Mortensen - "Eastern Promises" Who got completely robbed of a nomination: Matt Damon for "The Bourne Ultimatum" (okay, maybe not really-- but if there were an award for "Coolest Ass-Kicker," he'd have it sewn up) Performance by an actress in a leading roleWho I want to win: Laura Linney - "The Savages" (I know it's weird, but I love Laura Linney. She should win everything, as far as I'm concerned. Every movie should just star Laura Linney, playing everything. If she starred in the next Jason Bourne movie, my head might explode.)
Who I think will win: Marion Cotillard - "La Vie en Rose" The other nominees: Julie Christie - "Away from Her" Cate Blanchett - "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" Ellen Page - "Juno" Performance by an actor in a supporting roleWho I want to win: Javier Bardem - "No Country for Old Men" Who I think will win: Javier Bardem - "No Country for Old Men" The other nominees:
Casey Affleck - "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" Philip Seymour Hoffman - "Charlie Wilson's War" Hal Holbrook - "Into the Wild" Tom Wilkinson - "Michael Clayton" Performance by an actress in a supporting roleWho I want to win: Cate Blanchett - "I'm Not There"Who I think will win: Cate Blanchett - "I'm Not There" The other nominees:
Ruby Dee - "American Gangster" Saoirse Ronan - "Atonement" Amy Ryan - "Gone Baby Gone" Tilda Swinton - "Michael Clayton" Best animated feature film of the yearWhat I want to win: " Ratatouille" ( Brad Bird may be one of the smartest, most creative storytellers working today) What I think will win: "Ratatouille" The other nominees:
"Persepolis" "Surf's Up" (ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Did anyone see this movie?!) Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)What I want to win: Jonny Greenwood's score for "There Will Be Blood," which somehow didn't even get a nomination. What do you expect from the same people who keep falling over Atonement? What I think will win: "Atonement" - Dario Marianelli The other nominees:
"The Kite Runner" - Alberto Iglesias "Michael Clayton" - James Newton Howard "Ratatouille" - Michael Giacchino "3:10 to Yuma" - Marco Beltrami Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)What I want to win: " Falling Slowly" from "Once" - Music and Lyric by Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova (if you don't own this CD-- BUY IT. Today.) What I think will win: "Falling Slowly" from "Once" - Music and Lyric by Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova The other nominees:
"Happy Working Song" from "Enchanted" - Music by Alan Menken; Lyric by Stephen Schwartz "Raise It Up" from "August Rush" - Music and Lyric by Jamal Joseph, Charles Mack and Tevin Thomas "So Close" from "Enchanted" - Music by Alan Menken; Lyric by Stephen Schwartz "That's How You Know" from "Enchanted" - Music by Alan Menken; Lyric by Stephen Schwartz Achievement in art directionWhat I want to win: " The Golden Compass" - Art Direction: Dennis Gassner; Set Decoration: Anna PinnockWhat I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Art Direction: Jack Fisk; Set Decoration: Jim EricksonThe other nominees: "American Gangster” - Art Direction: Arthur Max; Set Decoration: Beth A. Rubino "Atonement" – Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer "Sweeney Todd" - Art Direction: Dante Ferretti; Set Decoration: Francesca Lo Schiavo Achievement in cinematographyWhat I want to win: "There Will Be Blood" - Robert ElswitWhat I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Robert Elswit The other nominees: "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" - Roger Deakins "Atonement" - Seamus McGarvey (to be fair, this is the one nomination I think this film deserves; unfortunately, gorgeous pictures don't make a story)"The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Janusz Kaminski "No Country for Old Men" - Roger Deakins Achievement in costume designWhat I want to win: "Across the Universe" - Albert Wolsky What I think will win: "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" - Alexandra Byrne The other nominees: "Atonement" - Jacqueline Durran "La Vie en Rose" - Marit Allen "Sweeney Todd” - Colleen Atwood Achievement in film editingWhat I want to win: "The Bourne Ultimatum" - Christopher Rouse (come on-- if there's one thing this film does deserve, it's every technical award it's up for-- its action scenes and camera work are extraordinary)What I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Dylan Tichenor
The other nominees: "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" - Juliette Welfling "Into the Wild" - Jay Cassidy "No Country for Old Men" - Roderick Jaynes Achievement in makeupWhat I want to win: " Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" - Ve Neill and Martin SamuelWhat I think will win: "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" - Ve Neill and Martin Samuel The other nominees: "La Vie en Rose" - Didier Lavergne and Jan Archibald "Norbit" - Rick Baker and Kazuhiro Tsuji Achievement in sound editingWhat I want to win: "The Bourne Ultimatum" - Karen Baker Landers and Per Hallberg (this movie was made by its sound... the scene where Jason Bourne chases Desh across the rooftops, and the fisticuffs in the apartment may be my favorite action scene from any movie ever)What I think will win: "There Will Be Blood" - Christopher Scarabosio and Matthew Wood (although I think the dark horse here could actually be "Transformers") The other nominees: "No Country for Old Men" - Skip Lievsay "Ratatouille" - Randy Thom and Michael Silvers "Transformers" - Ethan Van der Ryn and Mike Hopkins Achievement in sound mixingWhat I want to win: "The Bourne Ultimatum" - Scott Millan, David Parker and Kirk FrancisWhat I think will win: " Transformers" - Kevin O'Connell, Greg P. Russell and Peter J. Devlin
The other nominees: "No Country for Old Men" - Skip Lievsay, Craig Berkey, Greg Orloff and Peter Kurland "Ratatouille" - Randy Thom, Michael Semanick and Doc Kane "3:10 to Yuma" - Paul Massey, David Giammarco and Jim Stuebe Achievement in visual effectsWhat I want to win: "Transformers" - Scott Farrar, Scott Benza, Russell Earl and John FrazierWhat I think will win: "Transformers" - Scott Farrar, Scott Benza, Russell Earl and John Frazier The other nominees:
"The Golden Compass" - Michael Fink, Bill Westenhofer, Ben Morris and Trevor Wood "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" - John Knoll, Hal Hickel, Charles Gibson and John Frazier
Categories I am completely unqualified to comment on, so I'm not going to comment on them:
Best documentary feature Best documentary short subject Best animated short film Best live action short film Best foreign language film Fun Stuff
Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:48:46 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 19, 2008
VIDEO OF THE DAY: Harlan Ellison on Getting Paid as a Writer (oh my God-- I love this!)
Posted by chad
Thanks to Kate at FishbowlLA for finding this video, but OH MY GOD-- IT'S INCREDIBLE. A quick bit of backstory... yesterday, UnitedHollywood.com posted a recently-written-- and fairly pissed off-- response to the WGA-AMPTP deal by sci-fi guru Harlan Ellison. I don't necessarily agree with him, but his passion is AWESOME. Even more awesome is this video from Dreams With Sharp Teeth, a documentary about Ellison himself... maybe you've seen this... and granted, it's a little late now, considering the strike is over and the deal's done-- but if this doesn't make you stand up and go, "Yeah, fight the man!"... well, I don't know what will. It also makes me want to go read more Harlan Ellison. HARLAN ELLISON: PAY THE WRITER Fun Stuff | The Writers Strike 2007
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:19:24 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
Get Ready for Staffing Season (with a great discount)
Posted by chad
Hey, TV writers-- With staffing season ramping up in a matter of weeks ( upfronts have already been announced for May 12-15, which means staffing will begin immediately afterwards), now is the time to whip your TV spec into shape. So I'm teaching another 10-week spec-writing workshop with mediabistro.com, beginning Wednesday, February 27. This is a terrific class for anyone hoping to get staffed this year. Over the course of ten weeks, whether you're writing a Dexter, 30 Rock, The Office, Criminal Minds, or Weeds, you'll take your spec from mere story nugget to fully written script. We'll talk about how to structure your episode, nail your characters' voices, and-- most importantly-- inject your own original voice. And the class ends April 30... just in time for staffing season. And the best part is... Script Notes readers get a $75 dollar discount. Just call Stefanie at mediabistro (310-659-5668) to sign up, and tell her you're a Script Notes reader. Here's some more info, or click HERE to read more at mediabistro.com... WRITING THE TV SPEC SCRIPTWhen: 10 weeks, Wednesdays, February 27 - April 30, 7-10 pm Where: mediabistro.com, 7494 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 303, W. Hollywood, CA 90046 Cost: Originally $610, but tell them you saw the blog, and you get a $75 discount... only $535 To sign up: Call Stefanie at 310-659-5668 For more information: Click here... Events Activities and Things To Do | Writing Advice
Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:22:21 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, February 18, 2008
READER QUESTION: Are there any good TV-writing contests?
Posted by chad
Hey, guys-- happy President's Day... I'm not quite sure how we're supposed to celebrate, but hey-- day off, can't complain. Especially because I'm sitting at home, nursing a mild hangover from being at the Magic Castle all night. And I don't care what anyone says: the Magic Castle is the COOLEST PLACE ON EARTH. Saying that, of course, may make me a complete dork, but I don't care-- it's true (the Castle part, not the dork part, which is also probably true). And anyone who denies it hasn't been there or is lying. ANYWAY... after Friday's post about the Scriptapalooza screenwriting contest, I received a couple emails asking if there were any good TV writing contests, so I thought I'd take a minute to give you my thoughts on that. First of all, are there TV writing contests? Yes. Are there any good TV writing contests? That depends on your definition of good. If your definition of a "good" TV writing contest is a contest that rewards its winner with bragging rights, maybe some cash, and hopefully a chance to get their work read or seen by agents, execs, showrunners, etc.-- then YES: there is a tiny handful of TV writing contests (which we'll get to in a second). If your definition of a "good" TV writing contest is a contest that rewards its winner by landing them a staff job or getting their pilot made at a network or studio, then NO: there are no good TV writing contests. And here's why... Movies (and, therefore, movie scripts) are finite pieces of work. A movie lasts two hours, it's over, done. The story will never continue, go on, or repeat itself. (Sure, there are sequels, but most movies aren't written with a sequel already in mind... sequels are created as follow-ups to a proven successful property.) Most movies, by design, are intended to be close-ended experiences. This makes it very easy for producers, studios, or production companies to buy a script from a writer, say "thank you very much," and dispose of the writer. And I'm not saying "dispose of the writer" as a judgement call-- like when we all hear screenwriters complain about how they're treated like crap by the studios (which is often true, but a separate issue). I'm simply saying that once a screenwriter has finished a movie script, his work is done. The script does not go on. (This is one of the reasons we say film is a director-driven medium; while the story begins with the writer, it's really the director who brings it to life and puts his creative stamp on the movie. The director has much more control over the film's vision than the writer.) But this doesn't happen in television. Television shows make mini-movies every week, so they need their writers to stick around. When one script is finished, another must be written. Immediately. Thus, TV is a writer-driven medium... it's the writer or showrunner's vision which drives the show every week. This affects TV in two big ways... 1) It's why TV shows have staffs. One writer couldn't write twenty-two scripts back to back and have them be very good. (I know we read about Aaron Sorkin and David Kelley doing it, but they were clearly subjects in some bizarre genetic experiment that gave them amazing literary superpowers.) (I'm kidding. To be fair, no one knows how those guys do it. Centuries from now, archaeologists will look back and wonder who made Stonehenge, who erected Easter Island, and how the fuck Aaron Sorkin and David Kelley wrote so many scripts.) So writing staffs sit in a room together, for 8-15 hours a day, and write their episodes as a group. 2) It's why studios and networks rarely (and I mean rarely) buy shows and pilots from inexperienced TV writers. Designing a TV show-- and running it successfully-- often takes years of experience, so buyers tend to buy projects only from writers who have proven they can be sucessful TV writers and producers. And neither of these two points is very conducive to winning a contest. Winning a contest might get your script in front of people who could help you get a job-- showrunners, execs, agents, etc.-- but getting hired on a TV staff is about much more than just writing a good script. Being a TV writer is 50% writing talent and 50% personality (and, in the cases of some writers, more like 10%-90%). Thus, most showrunners hire people they already know: writers they've worked with, their own writers assitant, etc. And when they do hire a stranger, they definitely meet with that person-- at least once-- and usually try to recommendations from other people who have worked with them. And winning a contest definitely won't get your pilot picked up or produced as a series. (Of course, never say "definitely," because now that I've said it, it'll happen... but for the most part, I stand by my "definitely"). In fact, the very notion of winning a contest is antithetical to what it takes to develop and run a series. To be totally honest, if you see a contest purporting to give winners their own pilot or TV show: run-- it's probably not legit. Any contest claiming it can give winners their own TV show clearly doesn't have a firm understanding how TV shows are bought and sold. HAVING SAID ALL THIS... should you still apply to TV-writing contests?Sure, why not? What they will give you is... • Something cool to put on your writing resume • A possible open door to execs, agents, and showrunners • Hopefully, a bit of cash • Maybe some constructive feedback • A giant warm fuzzy • Experience writing • Experience getting rejected (which is going to happen to you way more than getting accepted, no matter what level you're at. Even David Kelley and Aaron Sorkin's shows get canceled.) So, here's a short list of TV writing contests that are-- at the very list-- legit. There may be more that I'm missing... if they are, please let me-- and everyone else-- know about them in the comments section below. As for these, I know nothing about the talent pool that applies to them or how successful they are at getting winners through important doors, but they at least aren't criminal fronts: • Writers Digest Screenplay and TV Writing Contest• Austin Film Festival Screenplay & Teleplay Competition• Scriptapalooza International TV Writing Competition• Larry Brody's Spec Scriptacular at TVWriter.com Career Advice | Events Activities and Things To Do | Reader Questions
Monday, February 18, 2008 5:00:10 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 15, 2008
Scriptapalooza Screenwriting Contest 2008
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- Some of you know the Scriptapalooza screenwriting contest, but for those of you who don't-- it's one of the industry's widely respected screenwriting competitions... and its deadline is March 5 (with its final deadline on April 15-- when you'll already be racing to get in your taxes). There are a lot of screenwriting contests out there, but most of them are either bogus or ignored by the industry... but Scriptapalooza is one of the few with street cred. Lifetime films Queen Sized (starring Hairspray leading lady Nikki Blonsky) and The Family Holiday both came from Scriptapalooza winners. And this year, for the first time ever, scripts are emailable to the contest... which is cool both because it's green-- and it saves you money! (Although personally-- every time I save money by being green, I use that money to go to a forest and chop down a tree. Just because I can.) Anyway, it's a good contest. Check it out at www.scriptapalooza.com. Career Advice | Events Activities and Things To Do
Friday, February 15, 2008 1:53:23 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, February 14, 2008
READER QUESTION: Is "Boston Legal" Spec-able?
Posted by chad
So... I got an interesting question yesterday in regards to my post about about this season's spec-able shows. Loyal reader Fig writes in: " Why is it that I've never heard of anyone writing a "Boston Legal" spec? (Or is it just me?)" It's funny, Fig-- when I read your question, my first response was, "Oh, yeah-- Boston Legal-- that must be a spec-able show!" But of all the people I asked... agents, execs, writers... not one of them mentioned Boston Legal. Which is weird, I know, because it's still a pretty popular show, and it seems-- in theory-- that a quirky, standalone show like that should be highly spec-able. But it's not... or, at least, it's not considered a "hot spec." And here, I think, is why... Reason #1) It's old. It's going into its fifth season this year, and most shows have lost their sexy new-kid-on-the-block status by then. And while you probably never want to spec a super-new show like, say, Eli Stone, or Aliens in America, you also don't want to spec something that feels like yesterday's news. And while I never really saw a glut of Boston Legal specs, there was definitely a time-- a few years ago-- when I saw many more than I do now. Which brings me to... Reason #2) For whatever reason-- and maybe this is just my own perception-- Boston Legal has never really felt "cool." Maybe because it was a spinoff of The Practice, which had been around forever, but Boston Legal just never felt like a fresh, new, groundbreaking show... which isn't necessarily fair, because it's very different than The Practice... and it's really good... but still-- it lives in that world, those characters were born on The Practice, and The Practice first premiered eleven years ago. This isn't to knock Boston Legal... I think it's so much better than many people give it credit for... I'm just saying that it has never felt like the show all the kids are watching. Having said all that-- if your heart is pounding to write a Boston Legal, my advice is: write a Boston Legal!While one of the first rules of spec-writing is to write a hot spec that execs, agents, and showrunners are dying to read, the real first rule of spec-writing... or of writing anything... is to write what you're most passionate about. Nothing will show off your true voice better than something your pour your heart into... whether it's this year's hot 30 Rock spec or a radio play about your mother. In other words, brilliant St. Elsewhere spec will get you farther than a mediocre Dexter. Of course, having said all this, it doesn't mean you should just damn the rules, write whatever you want, and expect to get staffed. The rules are there for a reason... every year, there are certain specs people like to read, and certain specs they don't. And the specs people like to read tend to get read first, plain and simple. So the best case scenario for you, as a writer, is to find a story you're deeply passionate about and implant it into one of the hot specs. Could your Boston Legal story work as a Dexter? How about a Mad Men? Maybe even a CSI (which is older than Boston Legal but still, somehow, manages to have a higher "cool factor")? If you can't adapt your story... if you're burning to tell a specific, heartfelt, personal tale that won't work as a Dexter or The Office... then by all means-- tell that story in whatever form it needs to be told, whether it's a spec of L.A. Law, an epic poem, or a stage play in iambic pentameter. Your goal is to rock your reader to his core... and if Boston Legal's the only way to do that, Boston Legal it is. Career Advice | Reader Questions | Writing Advice
Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:56:47 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, February 13, 2008
IT'S OFFICIAL: THE STRIKE IS OVER
Posted by chad
Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:19:56 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
This Year's Spec-able TV Shows
Posted by chad
Well, screenwriters-- here we are... the final day of the WGA writers strike. As I write this, writers in New York and L.A. are casting their votes to end the last three months' work stoppage. And the end of a work stoppage means only one thing... It's time to get back to work.TV networks have already announced which shows would be returning this spring, and ABC even gave 2008-2009 pickups to nine returning series, including Grey's Anatomy, Desperate Housewives, Dirty Sexy Money, and Pushing Daisies. Numerous pilots have also been greenlit, and NBC is even greenlighting some projects-- like Kath and Kim and Robinson Crusoe-- right to series. Which means we're looking at a pretty unconventional staffing season this year. Some shows may begin hiring writers immediately. Others will probably hire in late May, as usual. And still others may hire throughout the summer. The point is this... It's to get your writing samples in shape.Dust off that original material and finish that TV spec you've been procrastinating on. The urge to hire writers is definitely in the air, and I've had several email conversations today with writers and agents alike on what TV specs may be hot this staffing season. There weren't any huge breakout hits last fall... or even the previous year... so it's difficult to pinpoint exactly what specs people will be reading. But here are my lists of what seem to be shaping up to be this year's spec-able shows... COMEDY 30 Rock - Possibly the hottest comedy spec out there right now (which means people will probably be sick of reading it soon) The Office - There was a massive glut of these last year, and people were pretty tired of them, but it's still a well-respected show... so if you got a hankering to write an Office spec-- go for it) Weeds - Not the most-watched show, but it's well-respected and has a unique, edgy sensibility; paired with the right originals, this could be a very effective spec Samantha Who? - I'm gonna be honest: write this at your risk. It's a new show... and it was the closest thing TV had last year to a new hit comedy. It's coming back next fall, and who knows how it'll do. But if there's gonna be a new spec-able comedy on the market, it's probably gonna be this one.
DRAMA Dexter - A widely respected show, with a dark, ascerbic sensibility. This could be a huge spec this year (especially if it does well when it moves to CBS). Mad Men - It may be just a tad too early to officialy declare this show as spec-able, but if I were a betting man (which I'm not), I'd say this could be a hot spec very soon. Rescue Me - I would've thought this show was pretty tired as a spec, but I've talked agents who definitely like reading it still. Californication - I say spec at your own risk, although there are definitely agents and execs out there who will read it. Not a lot, but enough. Grey's Anatomy - Yeah, this show's old news, but people still love it, and that includes execs, agents, and other writers. I don't know if it'd be the number one show I'd tell you to spec, but if you love it and have a great idea for your story... go for it. Criminal Minds - This show never seems to get a lot of buzz in industry circles, but it's a hit nonetheless, and there haven't been any size-able new procedurals for a while. So again: maybe not the first thing I'd recommend, but probably spec-able. SHOWS TO KEEP AN EYE ON
There are several series out there which may not be spec-able yet... but could be soon. So keep an eye on them. Also, if you're dying to spec one of them know, take a shot... if they become hot specs a few weeks or months down the road, you'll be the first one on the market. If not... well... consider it an exercise that made you a better writer... Pushing Daisies Chuck Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles In Treatment Breaking Bad
Career Advice | Writing Advice
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 1:13:56 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, February 11, 2008
Come Celebrate... Hollywood-style!
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- If you're in the L.A.-area tomorrow, I'd love to invite you to a special party I'm hosting at Twist, the new bar/restaurant at the Hollywood Renaissance Hotel. You may have read my post a few weeks ago about Morning Call Time, the industry news podcast I'm launching with mediabistro.com and FishbowlLA. Well... tomorrow is our official launch party, and I'd love to see you there! We're hosting the party together with JHRTS (the Junior Hollywood Radio & Television Society, the junior organization of HRTS), one of the best networking organizations in town for young execs, writers, agents, producers, etc. So come by... have a drink... say hello... and meet a ton of great people, including other writers and producers working in TV, film, and new media. Here's all the info, and CLICK HERE to RSVP... WHERE: Twist - The Hollywood Renaissance Hotel 1755 N. Highland Ave. Hollywood, CA 90028 WHEN: Tuesday, Feb. 12 7:00 - 9:00 CLICK HERE TO RSVP (this is Hollywood, where ya gotta be on the list...) Hope to see you there! Events Activities and Things To Do
Monday, February 11, 2008 7:25:38 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Sunday, February 10, 2008
Strike To End By Wednesday?
Posted by chad
Hey, everyone-- the latest update: the WGA West Board of Directors and the WGA East Council will meet tomorrow and officially recommend the new WGA/ AMPTP deal. This recommendation will start an speeded-up two-day voting process for the entire WGA membership. Work will not resume until the membership votes to ratify the contract... which they're expected to do based on the postive responses at Saturday's membership meetings. Click here for for Variety's full report. Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Sunday, February 10, 2008 7:22:55 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Saturday, February 09, 2008
Interesting Perspectives on the WGA/AMPTP Deal
Posted by chad
Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Saturday, February 09, 2008 11:29:03 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
BREAKING NEWS: WGA Deal Inked!
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters-- After an all-night negotiating session, haggling over deals, the WGA and AMPTP have set in ink their new deal. The deal is very similar to the deal finalized by the Directors Guild last month, although it does have some impressive gains in the areas of residuals, separated rights, etc. This deal has not yet been approved by WGA membership, which received the deal via email at 3:00 a.m. from Guild presidents Patric Verrone and Michael Winship, but membership on both coasts will meet today to discuss. If membership response is in favor of the contract, the WGA West Board of Directors and WGA East Council will vote tomorrow on whether or not to officially recommend this deal. If this vote passes-- presumably pre-determined by membership's support-- the strike will be called off immediately, allowing work to resume and the industry to get back to normal. The deal won't be officially ratified, however, until WGA membership holds their official vote... a process that usually takes about ten days. Here's everything you need to know about the new deal, including the deal itself... THE DEAL: Click BELOW to read the text of the new WGA/AMPTP deal. WGAdeal (020908).pdf (140.36 KB)Cliick HERE to read the letter from WGA presidents Michael Winship and Patric Verrone. MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS: Here's info on today's two WGA meetings: New York Los AngelesCrowne Plaza Hotel, Times Square Shrine Auditorium Broadway Ballroom 665 W. Jefferson Blvd. 1606 Broadway (Broadway & 49th Street) REPORTAGE: Here's a list of top news sources and how they're reporting the deal... Variety The Hollywood Reporter Deadline Hollywood Daily New York Times The L.A. Times The Huffington Post
Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Saturday, February 09, 2008 5:11:09 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 08, 2008
GUEST PERSPECTIVE: Brad Wollack, talk show writer/producer
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters— One of the most controversial topics of the last few months has been the issue of writers writing for talk shows. After all, it’s no newsflash that most of the big talk shows came back on the air last month… in the middle of the strike… without their writers. But what was a newsflash (to many people) was that talk shows had writers at all. I mean, they’re “talk shows,” right? People sit around and… well… talk. So what could writers possibly do? I’ve gotten a bunch of emails and questions about this over the past couple weeks, so I decided to talk to someone who knows this world better than I do: my friend Brad Wollack, a writer/producer for Chelsea Lately, E!’s hit late night talk show hosted by Chelsea Handler. Brad’s also written for The Wayne Brady Show, as well as reality shows like Parental Control and Celebrity Duets. He’s also written for Joan Rivers and Melissa Rivers when they host the red carpets at the Oscars, Grammys, and Golden Globes. (You can also catch Brad as his alter ego, film critic Woody Wittman, on The Hollywoody Show.) So here to talk about the craft of talk show writing and how to break in… Brad Wollack. Brad, I’m confused. We keep hearing that talk shows like The Tonight Show and Jimmy Kimmel Live are back on the air without their writers. But talk shows are mostly jokes and interviews. What do talk show writers actually write?Jokes and the interview questions. Leno’s monologue on a typical night is 10 minutes long. Leno’s a great comic, but he doesn’t come up with 10 minutes of topical jokes every day. It takes a staff to produce volume. You have to produce X amount of jokes just to get stuff that will actually make air. It’s not like you write ten jokes and they’re all good jokes. You need volume… which means you need bodies and minds. [Also,] Leno, Letterman, Conan—especially Jon Stewart, if you consider that a talk show—do a lot of sketches and bits, and someone’s writing those. And often times writers end up having to direct those little sketches. So writing influences a lot. I always say when shit hits the fan—this is true on any series—the first person they turn to is the writer. “How do we fix this?” “How do we do that?” “How do we ask this person this question?” A lot of times they ask you to help producers craft good questions or think of bits to do. I remember when Martha Stewart was on Conan, years ago, and they had her chugging a 40. I wouldn’t be surprised if that idea came out of the writers room that morning. Writers help craft the whole show, guide the whole show, and are a support to the host. If you can’t tell that stuff has been written, if it seems natural for the host, the writing staff is doing a good job. What makes writing for a talk show different than writing for a sitcom or drama? Are the processes different? Do talk show writers need different kinds of skills and writing chops?They’re very different. First of all, the schedules are different. We work on a daily schedule; every day is a new [show]. We don’t work on the same episode for multiple days, we start fresh every single morning. As hard as that is, it’s also nice because you can just be done with it. When you go home at night, you [can say], “Well, we get to try again tomorrow.” …which is exciting, because the volume of material you’re producing in any given week is [enormous]. Talk shows are also very topical, so you’re always creating topical stuff that doesn’t get stale. With sitcoms, there’s a writers room, and they spend weeks working on scripts. Plus, to do a talk show, especially a Leno or a Letterman, the writers have to be really good at writing jokes. They have to be great joke-writers more than strong structural writers. Can you take any story and list off ten jokes about it… under a time pressure? We start at 9:45 every morning, and by 1:00 or 1:30, we have the whole show and all the jokes done. That’s a lot. We don’t succeed every day, but I think we succeed more often than we don’t, and the material is sound… but the daily turnaround is definitely a pressure. Another difference between talk shows and sitcoms: in sitcoms you’re writing for characters, whereas in talk shows you’re writing for a specific voice. [So] you really have to identify with the voice of the host. And [they’ll] argue with you. It’s not like Kramer (from Seinfeld) would come in and say, “I don’t do that! I don’t say that!” But Chelsea will come in and go, “No, I don’t want to say that. I don’t want to do that!” So you have to be specific in what you’re writing, and the voice you’re writing in. Walk me through a typical day in the life of a talk show writer on Chelsea Lately.9:25 – Arrive 9:35 – Get into the office (because I park in a faraway place) 9:36 – Walk down the hall, make a lot of noise, say good morning to everyone. Start talking, milling about. Slowly, casual conversation of “what did you do last night” turns into “what did you watch on TV last night? What can we make fun of?” 9:45 – We gather in the conference room and beat out the cold open. Then, we start working on our daily topics. We usually have five of those. Each daily topic is a big entertainment news story. We figure out our angle and five or six jokes that Chelsea can use. Chelsea is very involved in this, which is probably another big difference between a talk show and a sitcom or drama. [On those shows,] actors have no say. Or they might have a say, but they’re not in the writers room, whereas Chelsea is there every day bringing as many, if not more, jokes than everyone else. 11:30 – We break off and do our own thing. Write it up, put it in script form, put it on cards for Chelsea… and she goes to work, memorizing stuff, working on new material, [etc.]. Our job, as writers, is done by 1:30. Everything has to be in for her at 1:45 because we tape at 3:30. 1:45 – Rehearsal 3:30 - Tape What about bits and sketches shot on location? How are writers involved with those?A lot is done ahead of time, working out beats for the different jokes and stuff. But a lot [happens] in the field that you couldn’t even anticipate, so a lot of the writing is on the fly: feeding Chelsea lines, working out an angle you didn’t think of previously. Our head writer goes, and we have a dedicated field writer who goes. [Plus,] the writer who wrote the bit goes. So you have three people making sure lines are delivered. It’s very writing intensive, even though it’s not literally sitting down and going, “and then she’ll say this, and this guy says this.” You’ve also written for a daytime talk show, The Wayne Brady Show. How is writing for a daytime talk show different from writing for a night time talk show… or is it?You’re going for different audiences. Daytime, historically, is a very female audience: stay-at-home moms, what have you. You can’t be as edgy. You have to be a lot more broad, not so hard-hitting. A lot of times, daytime shows tape the day before… or a couple days before… so they’re not as topical. They’re more generalized, and they don’t go for hard-hitting jokes. [In] late night, you’re playing to a different audience. The people up at 11 a.m. watching Wayne Brady are very different from people who are up at 11:30 p.m. tuning into Chelsea. We can be a lot edgier, we’re going for a younger audience… an audience that’s typically tuning in to hear our host’s take on issues—especially with our show, since we’re establishing ourselves as the go-to source for cutting the bullshit on entertainment news. People want Chelsea’s harsh opinions. You must do insane amounts of research—how much do you have to read newspapers, magazines, watch tv, etc?Especially as a host, you have to be immersed in all of that… and as a writer, too. We follow the news in general, but we’re all assigned different magazines to look at every week, so we can bring that knowledge to the table. You have to be up on pop culture… and smart in general. You have to be able to reference stuff in the past. Ultimately, we can write whatever we want, and we (the writers) can have a bad day… but Chelsea can never have a bad day. She constantly has to be delivering. So she reads US Weekly, In Touch, all that stuff, voraciously, as well as watching every single TV show… and not only reading all that, but then formulating an opinion. It doesn’t end when you walk out the door. I’ve recently gotten a lot of emails from aspirants who want to write for talk shows. What’s the best way to become a talk show writer? If you’re an aspiring talk show writer living in Omaha, what’s the best path?Unfortunately, there is no formula for it. I backed into it because my agents represented Wayne Brady. He was looking for a new writer, I’d been doing stand-up, so I did a submission. And I got the job. But obviously [a writer] in Omaha can’t do that. If someone wants to put together a packet of material to impress a talk show producer, what do they need? I mean, in scripted TV, you write specs, sample scripts of 30 Rock or CSI or whatever… but in talk, how do you prove you’re a good writer?If you want to be a talk show writer, pick a show: Conan, Letterman, Leno, [etc.] They’re all different in style and structure, so you have to figure out which to do a sample for. Let’s say you did Conan. He typically does four topical jokes when he comes out at the top of the show, so you’d want to generate a list of 15-20 topical jokes based on that day or week’s news, to show you can write topically and write monologue jokes. You also want to generate some sketch ideas, both that [the host] can be in and also ones featuring new characters. Also, do existing sketches they do. What’s your submission of “ In the Year 2000?” Or your submission of when he drives his desk through the city? Any of those popular bits. You want to show that you know the show, and you can fit that style. Then, in terms of what you do with that, you’re free to send it in blindly to the executive producers with a note saying, “Hey, I’m in Omaha, but I’d love to write. What do you think?” [Of course,] you would probably have a better shot starting with a smaller show. You’re not going to get hired on Letterman if you’ve never had any experience, so you say, “Well, Spike Feresten has a talk show—late night on Saturdays and they’re probably much more available for staffing than Letterman or Leno.” Hold on—that’s weird. In scripted shows, you would never send a show a spec of itself. I.e., you can’t usually get a producer at Dexter to read a Dexter spec. But it sounds like talk shows work differently… like you submit to Leno a packet of material designed specifically for Leno. Is that right?Yeah—there’s a big difference. In talk shows, they want to see if you can write in their voice, style, and structure. So, would you ever submit a packet of spec Leno jokes you wrote to Chelsea Lately? Would you submit Jimmy Kimmel Live sketches to Letterman?I wouldn’t. Again, it’s a very specific voice you’re writing for. There may be ways to tweak the same joke so it fits each personality, but the way Letterman delivers a joke is very different from the way Leno delivers it, [which is different from] the way Chelsea Handler delivers it. So your best bet, if you can, is to do various submissions to show you can speak to each of those shows. It seems like a lot of talk show writers, such as yourself, were stand-ups before they became writers. Is stand-up a good way to hone your chops to become a talk show writer?Not only does it help hone your chops, it helps you learn how to write jokes and deliver jokes… which is important because part of the writing process is pitching. When you’re in the room each morning, pitching your jokes, you pitch it like you’re on a stage in a comedy show. You have to be able to sell it. [Stand-up] also introduces you to a lot of people. I know people who have gotten writing jobs based on the fact that they were in comedy clubs and knew this host or that host, or were friendly with one of the writers on Kimmel, who also did stand-up, and he knew of an opening on his staff. So it’s very useful for the networking aspect… and honing your writing and presentation skills. Any last thoughts?Make sure you really respect the comedy of the person you’re writing for. If you don’t know or respect the comedy, it’s not going to work out, regardless. When you’re on the same comedy wavelength as the host, it makes going to work every day really fun, because it’s just shooting the shit with your friends.
Check out Brad as Woody Wittman, accosting celebrities like Zac Efron, John Travolta, Buzz Aldrin, Allison Janney, and Queen Latifah on the red carpet... WOODY WITTMAN ON THE HOLLYWOODY SHOW
Career Advice | Guest Perspectives | Writing Advice
Friday, February 08, 2008 12:31:31 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, February 05, 2008
READER POLL: Should the WGA take the AMPTP deal currently on the table?
Posted by chad
So it's true... after exactly three months of striking, the WGA may finally have an acceptable offer from the AMPTP. Although we don't know the exact terms, the proposed contract supposedly improves the residual rates for online streaming as proposed in last month's DGA deal... it doubles the download residual rate... and secures guild jurisdiction over online content. The Writers Guild has agreed that as soon as it has an acceptable deal, it'll call off the strike. But is the current deal good enough? No one knows... and that's what's leading to heated controversy throughout Hollywood. Many people are clamoring that the WGA needs to take the deal as is; the studios have been fairly vocal that they won't give any more, and the strike has already wreaked enough damage on thousands of families. Others insist the WGA must hold out until it gets the deal it wants. The writers aren't asking for anything unfair or unreasonable, they claim; they deserve to get the benefits and compensation they deserve. Still others simply want to give the WGA time to make its decision on its own... free from the pressures and persuasions of agents, producers, execs, and journalists all weighing in. The soonest that decksion could come is this weekend... but it may take much longer. And if the WGA takes too long, it could jeopardize the Academy Awards, this year's pilot season, and the May Upfront presentations. (In order to save pilot season, say the studios, a deal must be in place by February 15... and if there's no pilot season, there probably won't be any May Upfronts. The Oscars fall on February 24.) So everyone's asking... WHAT'S A GUILD TO DO?One thing, however, is for sure... whatever happens will affect not only the TV and film writers in Hollywood, but every writer in the country-- novelists, journalists, playwrights-- who's current;y writing (or may someday write) something that could be used on television. So what's your take?...
Fun Stuff | The Writers Strike 2007
Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:16:28 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Sunday, February 03, 2008
THE WGA Deal Gets Closer?
Posted by chad
Still no official contract announcement from the WGA or AMPTP, but the L.A. Times published this story this morning, offering more hope that a deal could be imminent. Very imminent. Then, just over an hour ago, the WGA sent this email to members: "To Our Fellow Members, While fully mindful of the continuing media blackout, we write you to address the rumors and reports that undoubtedly you have been hearing. The facts: we are still in talks and do not yet have a contract. When and if a tentative agreement is reached, the first thing we will do is alert our membership with an e-mail message. Until then, please disregard rumors about either the existence of an agreement or its terms. Until we have reached an agreement with the AMPTP, it is essential that we continue to show our resolve, solidarity, and strength. Picketing will resume on Monday. Our leverage at the bargaining table is directly affected by your commitment to our cause. Please continue to show your support on the line. We are all in this together. Best, Patric M. Verrone President, WGAW Michael Winship President, WGAE" UPDATE: Hey, screenwriters-- I'll be traveling tomorrow, with no access to the internet. So not only will I not be able to post any updates or developments on the strike front, but you'll probably here the latest news before I do. But I should be back in the loop tomorrow night or Tuesday, so stay tuned. Also, we've got some great stuff coming up, including more interviews with Hollywood's top writers and producers... Oscar chatter... and more writing tips, advice, and exercises... Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Sunday, February 03, 2008 9:04:15 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Saturday, February 02, 2008
BREAKING NEWS: WGA Deal Almost Here??!
Posted by chad
Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:12:51 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
A "Suck-Salute" In Honor Of... CANADA
Posted by chad
Hey, screenwriters— Every once in a while, I like to take a few moments to pay tribute to someone who’s done something so lame, so asinine, so irrefutably SUCKY that they deserve their own reward. I call this honor a “Suck-Salute,” and I am pleased to announce today's very special winner… CANADA. Earlier this week, CBS announced it had picked up thirteen episodes of Flashpoint, a new scripted drama about a Strategic Response Team, an elite squad of cops trained to rescue hostages, disarm bombs, fight gangs, and all other kinds of cool cop stuff. What made this announcement so unusual, however… was that Hollywood's TV writers were (and still are, obviously) in the middle of a strike. And without writers, where could CBS have possibly bought this show? Directors don’t create and write TV shows. Neither do actors. Or production designers. Or construction foremen. The answer, it turned out, was relatively simple: Canada. Flashpoint is a Canadian show, written and produced entirely by Canadian writers, producers, and crews at CTV, Canada’s largest television network. Then, this morning, NBC and ABC announced that they, too, were picking up Canadian shows: two more dramas— The Listener and The Border—and a comedy, Sophie.Which means that while American writers are striking on the streets, shutting off the content stream to U.S. networks and studios in order to receive fair compensation for the work they produce, Canadian writers have turned around and sold those same companies their work… for less money. There’s only one word for behavior like that: douchey. (Yeah, I said it. It’s crass, it’s disgusting, it’s probably offensive. But it fits. And it’s French.) Now, the Writers Guild of Canada has already come out and said that none of these shows are “struck work,” meaning none are owned by companies targeted by the striking WGA. And they’re right. But after the incredible support the WGA has received from England and Australia, it’s a bit disappointing—and by “disappointing” I mean “nauseating”—to get stabbed in the back by our “friends” up north. Especially after we have given Canada millions of dollars in production from the countless TV shows and movies we shoot each year in places like Toronto and Vancouver. TV shows and movies that could’ve been shot on U.S. soil, but aren’t, thanks to better tax incentives above the border. I’ve never seen any of the shows acquired in these new deals. They may be good. They may be brilliant. They may be better than Seinfeld, CSI and I Love Lucy all rolled into one. I do know this, however: these shows’ writers and producers are spineless cowards who should be ashamed of their behavior. "Canada is ready for the big time,” Stephen Waddell, national executive director of ACTRA, Canada's actors union, told The Hollywood Reporter this morning. “If you look at the (Canadian) programs that are being produced now, they're interesting, they're innovative, they bring a new perspective." Really? Really, Canada? Because I believe if you were truly ready for the big time, you wouldn’t be leeching off your friends and fellow writers who are fighting for a fair deal that will—eventually and ultimately—benefit you (and all writers) as well. But if your idea of the “big time” is taking whatever desperate shot at American audiences you can get… while your friends and colleagues are fighting for their livelihood… then you’re right—you’re ready for the big time. A DISCLAIMER: This Suck-Salute is not necessarily intended for all of Canada… mainly just the gutless folks working at CTV, CBC, and the other companies involved with these shows. But to the rest of Canada, and especially Canadian writers, I will say this: this is your country. These are your companies, designed to entertain you, that are behaving like this. Americans, Brits, Mexicans, Germans, Africans, Russians, or Spaniards aren’t the ones watching your networks and studios’ shows… generating ad dollars… putting food on your writers and producers’ tables. You are. So if you at all find this behavior despicable, if you at all believe that America’s striking screenwriters aren’t just fighting for their rights and respect, but for the rights and respect of writers and artists everywhere, then it’s your responsibility to let these companies know it. So write a letter. Organize a strike support rally. Send a letter of support to the striking WGA at UnitedHollywood.com. Post something here! But don’t just sit there. This is your fight as well as ours. And your countrymen have betrayed you. Industry Updates | The Writers Strike 2007
Saturday, February 02, 2008 3:27:34 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Friday, February 01, 2008
Jen Grisanti: Part II - A Follow-Up
Posted by chad
Hey, guys-- After Wednesday's guest perspective from TV exec/producer Jen Grisanti, in which she talks about her new company, Jen Grisanti Consultancy, loyal reader Josh and a couple other people asked if she was a manager. So I talked to Jen, and here's what she had to say... JEN: "I am not a manager per se. I will independent produce; however, the main thrust of the business is to develop and cultivate the material of writers and directors. With a management company, I would be limited to only work with a small number of clients. With a consultancy, there is no limit and I don't take 10% of their earnings. I will eventually open a management arm of the consultancy, but not in the immediate future."Hope that helps, everyone! Career Advice | Guest Perspectives | Writing Advice
Friday, February 01, 2008 5:23:33 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
|