Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Blogroll




# Friday, October 31, 2008
Help American Idol Writers Fight for Fair Wages and Equal Rights!
Posted by Chad

Hey, writers--

We've talked a lot here about reality TV writers' fight for fair pay and equitable treatment.  Reality writers are often paid less-than-minimum wages, work illegally long hours, and rarely get breaks or meals... yet they're writing jokes, breaking stories, and crafting scenes just like writers on The Tonight Show or The Simpsons or CSI or The Colbert Report.

The Writers Guild is at the forefront of the fight for reality writers' rights, and their main target right now is Fremantle, the production company that owns and produces American Idol, one of the most powerful, profitable shows in the history of television.

Well, here's an easy, painless, two-second way for everyone to get involved...

Please CLICK HERE head to American Rights at Work and sign a letter to the American Idol producers showing your support.  You can then forward the letter to you friends... and help demand Fremantle treat their workers fairly.

Also, here's a video from the kickoff of the WGA's American Idol Truth Tour...



Events Activities and Things To Do | Industry Updates | Reality TV
Friday, October 31, 2008 7:29:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, October 30, 2008
BOOK REVIEW: The Sound Effects Bible
Posted by Chad

A friend of mine, Biagio Messina, who’s a super-talented TV producer and filmmaker, once told me: “The easiest way to make something LOOK good… is to make something SOUND good.”  (I may be paraphrasing, but that’s how I remember it.)

And he’s right.

A few weeks ago at work, we shot a sketch with a fight scene which—when I watched it the first time—felt completely weak and uninspired.  But as soon as our editor, Jorge, unleashed an orgy of sound effects on it—punches, bones crunching, etc.—it was wonderfully hilarious.

In this moment, I learned three lessons which—to be honest—I learn over and over and never remember as well as I should…

LESSON #1:  Jorge is an awesome editor. 

LESSON #2:  Biagio was right and always is.  And...

LESSON #3:  Whether you’re working on a reality TV show, a short film, or a 6-hour miniseries, sound effects are one of the best ways to bring something to life and make it sparkle.  The world’s most dazzling visual effects are often worthless if they don’t have the appropriate sounds to make them pop.

Having said that, I’ve always known very little about how sound guys work their magic.  I pick up some lingo here and there… and I’ve done a few radio pieces… but for the most part, I’m a sound idiot.

And—at the risk of making a gross generalization (which I’m gonna go ahead and make)—I think most writers are probably in the same boat.

Which is why Ric Viers’ new book, The Sound Effects Bible, is such a helpful tool.

Now, I’m gonna be honest… this is not a book you curl up with and enjoy in a single sitting.  It's also not the book you read to stir up your creative juices or think differently about your writing. 

It's exactly what the title says it is: a thorough introduction, a reference book, to the practical world of creating and using sound effects. 

...Which means this IS the book you read if you’re producing your first film and must learn how to produce sound effects… or if you’re starting your first job as a post-production P.A. and want to learn more about the post world… or if you’re a writer/producer and need to communicate more articulately with your post department… or even if you’re an experienced sound guy and just want to keep an easy-to-read manual handy.

The book begins with an overview of the “science of sound,” discussing frequencies, amplitudes, decibels, etc.  If this sounds like stuff you learned in junior high science class, you’re right… it is.  And while the last thing I would EVER want to re-read is my junior high science book, The Sound Effects Bible takes this information and helps you apply it practically, in the recording and usage of sound effects, in ways your junior high science teacher never did.

Viers goes through microphones… different types, how they work, which to use for different kinds of recording.  He talks about recorders… how they’ve evolved throughout history, differences between digital and analog, how to set up a recorder correctly.  He even walks you through designing your own sound effects recording studios and Foley stages.

For me, the most fascinating chapter was “The Ten Recording Commandments,” which outlines exactly how to record top-notch sound effects.  I’ve never before had to record any sound effects… and I don’t foresee needing to do it any time soon… but I love getting in-depth peeks into other artists’ creative processes, and Viers does such a good job of detailing his “commandments,” I felt like I could do it this afternoon.

The book also has a corresponding websitewww.soundeffectsbible.com—that includes the actual sound effects samples discussed in each chapter, video tutorials, and a ton of other useful information.  As of this morning, many of the coolest parts of the site (like the sound effects themselves) were still under construction, but once it’s up and running, the book and site together will be a powerful resource for anyone wading into the world of sound effects.

(I also hope Viers keeps the site updated with news on the latest sound effects developments, technologies, and resources, helping the book to be a constantly up-to-date guide to the world of sound.)

Anyway, if you're getting ready to produce a film... or work in post... or just want to learn more about one of the most important-- but often over-looked-- processes in film... check out the book and lemme know what you think...

In the mean time, here’s a tutorial video of author Ric Viers smashing a station wagon with sledgehammers and cement blocks (and if this is what sound effects guys do all day—count me in)…



Books Tools Resources | Production
Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:09:25 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Wednesday, October 29, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #7
Posted by Chad

Today's Script Notes Pitch Workshop submission comes from Mary S., who sends in the following logline for her feature project...

"In the feature length romantic comedy, American Breakfast, a bi-cultural young Latino flees an unjust U.S. sentence and clears away the wreckage of his irresponsible past in a quirky coastal Mexican village where he finds love, acceptance and a new life."

So please... post your constructive thoughts!  And if you have your own logline or synopsis on which you'd like some feedback, please email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com... or just post it in the comments section below.

In the mean time, thank you so much for submitting, Mary!


SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:44:23 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [5]
# Sunday, October 26, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: Entry #6
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys—

Wanted to take some time today to respond to our most recent submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop.  Thanks to Matt for submitting his work, and thanks also to Janine for her thoughtful online response.  Matt, I hope you found Janine’s thoughts helpful, and I just thought I’d add my own two cents.

For those who are new to the discussion, here’s Matt’s synopsis

Title: Downsize This!
Genre: Romantic Comedy

"Love in the Time of Downsizing"

Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in 6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish - and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.

But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric, alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing; he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence - that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate future within the company.

It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident; a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face during these tough economic times.

Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance prize.

In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?


WHAT I LIKE:
I’ll be honest, Matt—I am a total sucker for stories about people trying to get fired.  I think there is something absolutely hilarious about people behaving inappropriately in corporate/work environments.  A couple years ago, CBS and LMNO Productions did a reality show called Fire Me, Please, where employees had to compete to get fired without their bosses catching on.  It was—for all intents and purposes—a miserable failure… but I loved it.  So I think “Downsize This!” begins from a strong comedic starting place… the kind of premise that immediately allows you to brainstorm scores of hilarious scenarios.  

You’ve also given Steve a strong, relatable want… to get fired and get a severance package, which is something we’ve all dreamed of, especially working at jobs we despise.  So right off the bat, you’re in a good place to generate story… you have a fertile premise and a character with a solid objective, both of which put you in a good starting posigion.


WHAT I’D WORK ON:
I agree with Janine’s comments… despite having a strong starting place, I think there are a lot of confusing elements in this synopsis, and they’re muddying both your A-story (Steve trying to get fired) and your B-story (Steve trying to win Alice).

While I obviously haven’t talked to you at all about your story, my sense—simply from readying the synopsis—is that much of the confusion is coming from a flaw in your writing process, and that flaw is this…

I think you’re creating story situations based on things you, the storyteller, WANT to have happen… or things you think SHOULD happen… rather than creating story situations by letting characters and events play out organically.

I know that sounds like a weird note, since we—as storytellers—are obviously in control of our stories and responsible for creative decisions, but being creatively responsible doesn’t necessarily mean we can simply wrench stories and characters in any direction we want; in fact, it often means that while we do indeed CREATE a story, we must also SERVE the story… or, rather, do what is right for the story… make it as relatable, believable, and powerful as possible—even if that means sacrificing things we want to happen.

The reason I say this in regard to “Downsize This” is that while your movie has a wonderful premise, it feels like many of its actions, events, and characters don’t behave in ways that seem honest, familiar, or true to human behavior.  And since your premise is so ripe… and Steve’s want is so strong… your audience immediately has visions of how this story “should” play out.  Thus, when your characters behave in contradiction to those expectations, it makes it very hard to believe in them or their world.  This doesn’t mean your story should be predictable; it just means it needs to operate within the “rules” and expectations of how we believe people would act in the situation you’ve set up.

For instance… Steve is a “miserable, cantankerous SOB” who has been trying to get downsized for a long time.  But instead of firing him—even in “tough economic times”—his company puts him into a six-week “Wellness Program” to change his attitude.  Well, first of all—I’ve never heard of a company that puts troublemakers through their own “attitude rehab.”  Companies may put an employee on probation, but they don’t usually put them through a six-week readjustment program.  Why wouldn’t they just fire Steve?  He’s a bad worker who doesn’t want to be there… why spend six weeks of valuable time, money, and energy trying to “fix” him?

Then, Steve meets Alice… and he INSTANTANEOUSLY becomes a new person: cool, confident and charismatic.  Now, love is a powerful thing… but I’m not sure it can instantly change someone from “miserable” and “cantankerous” to cool, confident and charismatic.  This just doesn’t seem like believable behavior… or at least, none I’ve ever seen in the real world.  First of all—how does Steve change so dramatically so quickly?  Second of all—it’s tough to swallow that such a miserable jerk would so quickly fall in love.  And while you say it’s a “façade,” that confuses things even more: does Steve actually like Alice?  Because if he DOES, then it’s NOT a façade; it’s a sincere attempt to be a better person and win her heart.  And if he doesn’t like her, then why should we care about their relationship?  Or, more importantly, why is she even in the story?

I also don’t buy that Steve’s boss—who knew Steve was such an asshole he had him put in a “wellness program”—would be so instantly duped by his transformation that he would suddenly make Steve the “new face of the company.”  I mean, the boss knew what Steve was like before… so wouldn’t be super-skeptical of this “new Steve?”  Even if he wasn’t skeptical, why would he make this guy—who less than two months earlier was on the verge of getting fired—the “new face” of the company?

Along those same lines, why do all these women who knew the “old Steve” suddenly fall head-over-heels for the “new Steve?”  Most men spend a lifetime trying to find that kind of female-attracting behavior, and Steve—a known misanthrope—suddenly fakes (after meeting ONE GIRL) and all the other women fall for it.  I don’t buy that Steve—or anyone—could do that… and I don’t buy that all these women are stupid enough to fall for it.

Perhaps most importantly, if Steve’s incredible ability to be a brilliant businessman was nestled just below the surface… why didn’t he ever step up before?  I mean, once Steve meets Alice, he becomes a virtual superhero, possessing nearly inhuman business savvy and romantic prowess.  So where were these skills before?  I suppose you could say he hated his job so he never used them, but I don’t believe that someone in possession of these kinds of skills is an antisocial bum.  Why couldn’t he have just gotten another job?  Or why wasn’t he using these skills all along to get ahead, pick up chicks, dupe his boss, etc.?

Now, Matt—I know it seems like I’m really ripping apart every beat of your story here, and in a way I am.  But here’s why I said earlier I think your process is flawed and you’re trying to twist the story in directions it doesn’t want to go…

I can see how each of these moments would work and be funny… in their own movie.  We’ve all seen movies—and will see many more—about losers who acquire business/romantic skills and find themselves catapulted to the top of the social food chain (What Women Want, Love Potion #9).  We’ve all seen movies about guys who work to become different people to win a girl (Hitch).  We’ve seen movies about people pretending to be someone they’re not to get ahead in the corporate world (The Secret of My Success, Working Girl, Taking Care of Business).  We’ve all seen movies that satirize and condemn the corporate world (Office Space).  

So each of your story moments could be very effective, Matt… and I understand why you like them all.  But that doesn’t mean they all belong in the same movie… and combining them seems to blur the story you really want to tell.

My advice: think about the story you really want to tell, the story scratching and clawing its way out of your imagination.  Don’t pick the story you think is the most commercial… or even the most original… or the easiest to shoot on a low-budget… or the easiest to make as a summer tentpole… or the best to get you into film school.  Pick the one story that will haunt you and eat at you if you DON’T tell it.

Once you’ve done that, write your logline.  This isn’t so you an pitch it easily and quickly; it’s so you have—in short sentence form—the core essence of your screenplay. For sake of this example, let’s say your logline is…

“When Steve, a cantankerous misanthrope, learns his company will be laying off its ten lowest-performing employees and giving them severance packages, he becomes determined to under-perform his co-workers, get fired, and use the money to achieve his dream: starting his own comic book store.”

Print this out and tape it above your desk.  As you continue to work, refer back to this logline as often as you need to to make sure your story is laser-focused and not veering off in weird directions.

Next step: brainstorming.  I usually like to do this somewhere other than the place where I do most of my writing.  I’ll go outside… or to the park… or a café… or the swimming pool.  Anywhere where I can feel unconfined and free of the environment where I do most of my other thinking and working.  Personally, I think it’s tough to do “new” thinking when you’re surrounded by “old” environments.

Take a pad and brainstorm all the things Steve might do to try and achieve his goal.   Don’t censor yourself as you write… simply let as many ideas as possible flow from your brain to your pencil and onto the paper.  Never let your pencil stop moving.  Even if you’re scribbling lame, ridiculous ideas… let them come.  A strong premise—whether comedy or drama—should generate a nearly infinite number of ideas.  

Just looking at the above Steve/comic book shop example, I’m gonna do a quick brainstorming session.  Here we go, right off the top of my head…

WAYS STEVE MIGHT TRY TO GET FIRED/LAID OFF
•  Never turn in any work
•  Show up late
•  Sleep with the boss’s wife
•  Sleep with the boss’s daughter
•  Dress like a clown
•  Fart wherever he goes
•  Eat lunch without a fork or spoon—just put his face right in the plate
•  Only communicate by singing
•  Hop everywhere he goes
•  Call his co-workers names
•  Pee himself constantly
•  Wear his clothes backwards
•  Start selling off the office equipment

Now, I’m not saying any of those or good, funny, or even helpful idea.  What I AM saying is this: I typed those in about 30 seconds of spur-of-the-moment thinking.  If you were to spend even just an hour doing this, you’d have HUNDREDS of ideas.

Your job is then to pick the best of those (and by “best,” I mean those that are the most true and honest to Steve’s character, his want, and the world of the story—not those that you most want to happen), and begin to think about what would logically happen if they were to happen.  

For instance, if Steve started communicating only by singing, he’d probably annoy and anger a lot of people… at first.  But then maybe people would grow to like his singing—maybe it’s a cheerful break in an otherwise dreary workplace—and the office would institute musical Fridays, allowing people to play CD’s and listen to radios.  So Steve would need to think of a new tactic.  Perhaps he tries to sleep with his boss’s wife… only to discover that his boss and his wife have an open marriage, and his boss wants to join them.

Again—I’m not saying ANY of these ideas are right for the story you want to tell.  I’m simply trying to concoct examples that are on-point for Steve’s objective and have a cause-effect relationship that seems believable… in both our world and your story-world.

Anyway, Matt—like I said earlier, I think you have a strong comic premise and a character with a great want; my sense is that you simply got sidetracked by subplots and story elements that seemed interesting, but weren’t necessarily integral to your main story.  I even think that as you go back and reconstruct your story, focusing on your A-story, you’ll see how the B-story (the Alice love story) can integrate itself more organically without derailing everything else.

I hope this is helpful info… good luck with project, and lemme know how it goes!

For the rest of you, if you have loglines or summaries you’d like to submit to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to email me at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com, or simply post them in a “comments section” here on the blog.

In the mean time, we’ve got some great stuff coming up… more Pitch Workshop submissions, book reviews, some great website recommendations, and more questions from readers!

Have a good Sunday!


Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Sunday, October 26, 2008 11:33:29 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Thursday, October 23, 2008
MOVIE TALK: Changeling
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

Saw Changeling last night, the new movie by director Clint Eastwood and screenwriter J. Michael Straczynski (former Writers Digest columnist/author!), and I have to say:

This movie is many things…

•  A disturbing psychological thriller
•  A restrained “little-guy-takes-on-the-system” drama
•  A great screenwriting lesson
•  A scathing indictment of the Bush administration

Based on a true story, Changeling begins in 1928 and follows Christine Collins (Angelina Jolie), a Los Angeles woman whose son, Walter (Gatlin Griffith), mysteriously disappears.  Distraught, Collins goes to the LA Police Department, which has been under fire lately from press accusations of corruption, ineptitude, etc.  Over the next five months, Collins becomes a local cause celebre, especially on the radio show of L.A. firebrand Reverend Gustav Briegleb (John Malkovich), whose mission in life is to expose and punish the corruption at LAPD.  Until one day, Collins gets a call from Captain J.J. Jones, the cop handling her case (Jeffrey Donovan)…

The police have found her son, living with a drifter in DeKalb, Illinois.  Yet when Jones returns Walter to her, Collins is horrified… THIS BOY IS NOT HER SON.

And this is where things get interesting.

Although Collins attempts to convince the authorities that the child is not hers, they convince her she’s overwhelmed with emotion and unable to recognize the boy.  When Collins notices actual physiological and anatomical differences—the new “Walter” is three inches shorter and circumcised—the police send over doctors to “scientifically explain” the changes: trauma makes people shrink, the drifter may have circumcised the kid himself, etc.  But when Collins refused to back down, Captain Jones gets aggressive, committing her to an insane asylum where the shrink refuses to declare her “healthy” unless she agrees the boy is hers.

These early scenes (and by “early,” I mean the first two thirds of the film) are the strongest part… both a Kafka-esque nightmare and a Hitchcockian thriller about a falsely accused protagonist battling against massive, mysterious forces beyond her control.  Eastwood and Straczynski even seem to be embracing specific Hitchcock tropes… the cops/authority figures who won’t listen, doctors who twist Collins’ words back on her, the use of elaborate psychological explanations and treatments, etc.  Even the characters actors seem to be embracing Hitchcock types: a man-boy-ish, Anthony Perkins-esque serial killer… a bulldog-ish nurse… etc.

These sections of the movie are also a brilliant condemnation of the Bush White House.  The obstinate, arrogant, proud Captain Jones twists facts and circumvents laws in order to achieve his own personal motives and avoid repercussions.  When he’s presented with solid evidence that “Walter” is not Collins’ son, he denies it and sends in his own “experts” to prove otherwise.  He sentences Collins to an inhumane prison (an insane asylum) with no trial, evaluation, or even chance for rebuttal.  He defends his actions with lines like, “Departmental policy is what I say it is,” and “This police department does not tolerate dissent, embarrassment, or contradiction.”  All this time, the real perpetrators of the crime are running around free, but Jones doesn't care; he's too focused on his own crusades and bending truth to make them happen.  When taken to task for his actions, Captain Jones defends them on grounds that he acted appropriately based on information he was given… and he’s not responsible for being given false information.  (“Extraordinary steps were taken because we were dealing with an extraordinary situation,” he says.)

Most importantly, however (at least for our Script Notes purposes!), I was struck by how Changeling is a perfect example of screenwriting’s most basic tenet: a character with a simple, solid, tanible “want” meets an immovable obstacle… and must take action to defeat it.

Collins’ want is obvious… she wants to find her son… and she articulates this simply and clearly throughout the movie, literally saying—over and over—“I want to find my son,” “Where is my son,” "I want my son back," etc.  Even when it has become apparent that LAPD is pulling strings and being shady… even when we, the audience, are hungering for the defeat of Jones and the evil cops… Collins doesn’t stray from her single-minded want: “I want to find my son.”

I think this is an important lesson, because screenwriters often think the best way to give characters dimension and complexity is to give them MULTIPLE WANTS… but this actually just confuses the story.  Collins is relentless in what she’s trying to accomplish… even when Captain Jones gets his comeuppance—and lesser screenwriters would’ve said, “Okay, the bad guy is vanquished”—Straczynski knows the story can’t end until the protagonist’s want is fulfilled (or, if she doesn’t succeed, at least addressed).  (To be fair, the movie’s biggest flaw is that it goes on a bit long; it has about seven endings.  Still, it’s never less than riveting…)

Likewise, Straczynski’s villain—Jones and the LAPD—is equally unstoppable… and more powerful.  Jones barely has to struggle to tamp down Collins when he needs to; with an entire police force and a gaggle of lapdog reporters at his disposal, he simply utters a few words and Collins gets pummeled.

It’s truly a case of “an unstoppable force” meeting “an immoveable object,” and Collins triumphs only by never giving up and chipping away, slowly and steadfastly.  It’s screenwriting—and theoretical physics—at its most basic.

I know this lesson seems elementary, but I LOVE learning this, being reminded of this, over and over.  I often find that when I’m blocked, or unable to break a story, it’s returning to Screenwriting 101 basics that’s most helpful… that I’m usually stuck precisely because I’ve forgotten the foundations of solid storystelling.  I’m trying to complicate a simple situation… or I’ve given my character multiple/confusing wants… or my antagonist isn’t powerful enough and it’s weakening my story.  And by being reminded of rules as simple as clarifying and reminding myself of my character’s one tangible want, I’m able to get see the story anew and move forward.

Anyway, Changeling opens this weekend… do yourself a favor and check it out.  It’s not only a terrific movie, it’s a wonderful lesson in simple, irrefutable storytelling and screenwriting.

Lemme know what you think of it...

Chad


Changeling Trailer


Movie Talk
Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:47:55 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Chatting About TV Writing... Take a Listen!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Just wanted to invite you all to listen to a recent podcast interview I did on the Alive! Authors Network... all about TV writing and the TV industry.

This is the first of a 3-part interview I did, called Breaking In and Breaking Through the TV Business, with podcast host Judith Parker Harris.  We talk about finding your own voice, common mistakes, ageism in Hollywood, how to deal with criticism, show business myths and misnomers... and more!

Click HERE to go to the podcast...

Take a listen and lemme know what you think... the next two segments will be available over the next few weeks!


Career Advice | Digital Media and Web Series | Fun Stuff | Interesting Talking Points | Writing Advice
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:47:10 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Monday, October 20, 2008
READER QUESTION: Protecting Your Work: Part II (an afterthought)
Posted by Chad

First of all, special thanks to Heather, a lawyer who responded to yesterday's post about protecting your work with the following advice:

"It may be that writers don't typically register scripts with the US copyright office, but I can tell you (as an attorney) that the ONLY way to get into federal court with a claim of copyright infringement is with a US copyright.

The WGA registration won't be enough (which is probably why screenwriters don't use it in court to claim copyright infringement).

Mailing a copy of the script to yourself (and leaving it unopened with the postage dated) won't do you any good either, legally.

This is not to say that Chad's advice here is incorrect; what is written here may very well be what screenwriters do. But legally, the US copyright is the only one that will stand up in court.

But even that will only protect the *expression* of the idea in your screenplay. Ideas themselves cannot be copyrighted, so the script must be extremely close to yours to fit the definition of copyright infringement. A similar plot won't be sufficient."

Heather-- this is a terrific, valuable info-- THANK YOU!

Secondly, Heather's post made me realize I didn't mention the #1 way most working Hollywood writers protect their work when sending it to studios, networks, production companies, producers or other readers and buyers...

They send it through an agent, lawyer or other type of middleman.

Most professional screenwriters use an agent, which-- in California-- is a representative legally bonded by the state and empowered to procure work and negotiate contracts (different states have different rules about who can be an agent and what they can/can't do). 

Others use a manager, which-- technically-- are simply supposed to be career advisers and can't legally procure work or negotiate contracts (but this doesn't mean they don't do it... the lines between agents and managers have become very fuzzy).

Rarely are lawyers used to submit material or procure work, but this doesn't mean it can't happen.  Still, most lawyers simply negotiate, proof, and execute contracts.

Of course, if you don't have an agent, lawyer, or manager, it's tougher to submit work this way.  If you have a lawyer friend-- even if they're not an official entertainment lawyer-- perhaps you can ask them to submit your material anyway.  It's not the usual mode of business, but at least there's some layer of legal protection... or, at the very least, the appearance of legal representation.

Having said all this, there's still no guarantee of protection.  As Heather points out, the only way to TRULY protect a piece of writing is through the U.S. Copyright Office, and-- to be honest-- I've never heard of a writer doing that.  And as I pointed out yesterday, I don't believe ideas DO get stolen in Hollywood... at least not on a regular basis. 

At any rate, as a writer struggling to break in, what you should be worrying about isn't how to protect your ideas... but how to get them in front of as many official buyers as possible...


Career Advice | Interesting Talking Points | Reader Questions
Monday, October 20, 2008 6:27:11 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Sunday, October 19, 2008
READER QUESTION: How Should I Protect or Copyright My Writing?
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Today’s reader question comes from Joseph, who writes…

“I have recently finished my first spec script and am about to start the revision process. I am planning to give the first draft to some writer friends of mine, one is a professional screenwriter, in order to get some feedback. Although I trust them, I want to be sure that my investment and work are secure. When should I register my script with the copyright office?

Thanks for the question, Joseph!  I hear this question a lot, so you’re speaking for a lot of writers out there.

Also, be prepared… I know my answer is going to stir up some controversy, so be prepared.  And if it does stir up controversy—if anyone reading wants to comment—please comment below!  (I love getting good heated chatter on the comment boards!)

So, here goes…

Part One (non-controversial):

Screenwriters don’t actually register scripts with the U.S. Copyright Office.  They register them with the Writers Guild of America, the labor union which represents and protects most writers working in film, TV, and even radio.  This is a super-simple process which you can now do online for $20 (click HERE to go right to the WGA’s registration page).  You don’t even have to be a member of the Guild to do this—anyone can register their script, treatment, reality TV idea, etc.!

(To be fair, you probably COULD register your work with the copyright office, but I’ve honestly never heard of anyone doing this, and I have no idea how it’s done.  The WGA is the standard registration outlet for screenwriters.  I’ve also heard you can put your script in an envelope and mail it back to yourself.  Then, simply keep the unopened envelope in a safe place; the postmark indicates the date on which the contents were created, proving you wrote the script before that date.  But again—the real registration place is the WGA.)

Having said that, everything you write is—in theory—legally copyrighted as soon as you put it down on paper.  So a WGA registration isn’t necessarily better proof than simply mailing your script back to you.  Sure, the WGA registration process is more specific and specialized than simply mailing a script to yourself, but it’s not necessarily BETTER.  

(To be honest, I’ve never heard of anyone claiming their script was stolen, then using WGA registration as proof to win their case.  Maybe it has happened; I’ve just never heard of it.  I will say: the Guild often steps in to arbitrate rewrite disputes, like when George Clooney went “fi-core” early this year over Leatherheads, and the WGA is usually very fair in these disputes.)  (I don’t know why Clooney was so upset… if I were him, I wouldn’t have WANTED rewrite credit on Leatherheads.)


Part Two (here comes the controversial part):

While I never discourage anyone from registering their scripts with the WGA, I don’t usually “encourage” it, either.  Mainly because: IT DOESN’T REALLY MATTER.  Here’s why…

TV and movie ideas rarely get stolen.  I know people think they do… and we’ve all heard legends and horror stories of “I know a guy who wrote a script just like Quarantine, he tried selling it, and two years later another company came out with a movie just like it”… but the truth is…

IDEAS RARELY GET STOLEN IN HOLLYWOOD.

First of all, there are no new ideas out there.  My old screenwriting teacher used to say, “Whatever you’re working on, you must always assume there are five other identical projects in development at the exact same time”… and he’s right.  I once had a student approach me at one of my classes, claiming he had an original idea that had NEVER been thought of—he was sure of it—and he wanted to know how to protect it.  But when he pitched me the logline, it was just like a TV series already in development at two different networks.

Now, just because there are similar projects out there isn’t reason enough to not worry about protecting your work.  What it means is this:

IT’S RARELY YOUR IDEA ITSELF THAT HAS VALUE… IT’S THE EXECUTION OF THAT IDEA.

In other words, ideas themselves are almost worthless; it’s a writer’s unique take on any idea that gives it value.

I often use the example of The Cosby Show and Everybody Loves Raymond.  On paper, these are nearly identical TV shows: befuddled dads attempt to maintain control over their worlds as they navigate marriage and fatherhood.  But the execution of these shows—how their storytellers see the worlds in which they live—is drastically different, and no one would accuse Raymond creators Phil Rosenthal or Ray Romano of ripping off Bill Cosby.

You can probably come up with a million different examples, shows or movies that are similar but have very different takes… Fringe and The X-Files, The Sixth Sense and Stir of Echoes, etc.

Executive, producers, networks, and studios know this.  After all, they’re not just looking for good ideas… they’re looking for good writers who can EXECUTE those ideas.  Writers who have unique perspectives and fresh ways of seeing the world.  Which means if you’ve done your job well, in both developing and writing your script, your story can’t be told without you.  

Thus, the best protection your script has is to make sure you’ve told a story ONLY YOU CAN TELL. Or rather: make sure you’ve written a story only you can tell in the way you would tell it… and in someone else’s hands it becomes a different story.

So, am I suggesting you don’t protect your work?  NO.  If spending $20 on a WGA registration gives you peace of mind, I say GO FOR IT.  (And for $20, why not?)  But I certaily wouldn’t let NOT being registered stand in the way of showing my script to people or getting feedback.

And whatever you do, DO NOT—repeat: DO NOT—put your WGA registration number on the front of your script.  Don’t even write “WGA registered,” which some fledgling screenwriters do.  THIS IS A SURE SIGN OF AN AMATEUR.  Professional screenwriters do not do this… and the moment producers, execs, or agents get a script with this emblazoned on the script, the thought that flashes through their mind is: “amateur.”  And while they’ll still judge the script on its own merits, you’ve already planted a tiny seed that may—even a tiny bit—affect their read.

So, to sum up: go ahead and register your script.  It can’t hurt.  But know that you’re simply paying for peace of mind, to quell your own fears (which, as a neurotic writer, I know can be overwhelming)… not necessarily any genuine protection or stamp of professionalism.


Books Tools Resources | Career Advice | Interesting Talking Points | Reader Questions
Sunday, October 19, 2008 7:30:29 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Friday, October 17, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 5
Posted by Chad

Today's submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Matt in Montreal, who is looking for feedback on his synopsis for his feature idea, Downsize This! (although he's not married to the title).  He also says:

"I'm aiming for a Jim Carrey inspired, farout main Protagonist, contrasted with an even wilder love interest, populated with supporting characters with their own selfish designs...

I'm happy with what I have here, but if you could offer me any specific guidance with how to improve the above synopsis, I would greatly appreciate it."


So please... take a look and post your constructive criticism in the comments section below!  Here's Matt's synopsis... and thanks for submitting, Matt!...


Title: Downsize This!
Genre: Romantic Comedy

"Love in the Time of Downsizing"

Steve (40) is a miserable, cantankerous SOB, who finds that his long-laid plans for self-downsizing is finally starting to bear fruit when his Boss presents him with an offer he can't refuse: submit to the company's new Wellness Program, and if in 6 weeks, his disruptive at work attitude can't be adjusted; his self-downsizing wish - and the severance windfall that accompanies it - will be granted.

But when Steve meets and immediately falls in love with Alice (36), the sexy, eccentric, alcoholic Wellness Program Instructor he learns is (unwillingly) destined for downsizing; he presents a very different face at work - one of charisma and cool confidence - that brings a surge of curious new members to Alice's program; securing her immediate future within the company.

It also garners the attention of the Boss' who mistake Steve's charade as proof that he may just be what they've been looking for: someone fresh, re-energized, and confident; a man who can be presented to the Board as appearing to be the company's new face during these tough economic times.

Meanwhile, Steve struggles to woo Alice away from a competing nemesis while juggling his new found celebrity with other female co-workers, as he continues to plot his professional demise within the company in the hopes of receiving his elusive severance prize.

In the end, Steve must decide if what he wants - financial independence - is really worth sacrificing what it is he truly needs - love?


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP
Friday, October 17, 2008 10:20:30 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [4]
# Thursday, October 16, 2008
Batman vs. McCain: Last Night's Debate
Posted by Chad

A great clip from last night's debate... or not... (courtesy of Andrew Sullivan's "Daily Dish" at The Atlantic)...


Batman vs. The Penguin (the debate)


Fun Stuff
Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:40:22 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
PITCH WORKSHOP/READER QUESTION: The Importance of Loglines
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Just wanted to give a quick follow-up to Tuesday’s episode of the Script Notes Pitch Workshop… and an answer to a question asked by Scott, the author of Tuesday’s Pitch Workshop entries.  Scott writes:

“Wow, thank you so much for all your help. You are completely right, I know what the story is about but I have not explained that. I think i just found it so hard to distill my ideas into one or two sentences that I end up just writing generic lines.

Should I expand them a bit beyond two sentences? Or should I focus more on keeping it short but packing more information in? I could write a paragraph which would be a lot simpler and easier to read, but I dont want to write too much.”


Scott… I’m so glad you asked, because I get this question a lot: some version of “I can’t distill my story idea into just one sentence,” or “My story is too complicated to be condensed into a single line.”

It’s a common challenge… every writer goes through it… but here’s my answer… (and I’m gonna sound like an asshole when I say this, so I’m just gonna say it)…

If you can’t distill your story into a single sentence, you don’t yet know what your story IS.

Now, I know what you’re thinking… “Of course, I know what my story is… it’s my story… how would you know if I know it or not?!”  But bare with me…

There’s not a story in the world that can’t be boiled down to one sentence.  The Iliad, Citizen Kane, A Rose For Emily, The Office, Freddy Vs. Jason, Dragnet… every tale in the history of the world can be told in a single line.  Take a look…

•  Kim, a twentysomething recovering drug addict, must confront the ghosts of her family’s past when she returns home from rehab the week of her sister’s wedding.  (Rachel Getting Married)

•  Liz, a thirtysomething TV writer, attempts to maintain her artistic integrity, vision, and sense of self as she produces a sketch show under the aegis of a massive commercial corporation.  (30 Rock)

•  When terrorists kidnap the president and take over the White House, Mitch Rapp—a level-headed, tough-as-nails secret agent—must single-handedly do what the ineffectual U.S. government can not: infiltrate the White House, rescue the president, and defeat the terrorists. (Transfer of Power)

Now, these loglines aren’t necessarily perfect, but I do think they sift out each story’s essence: the story’s main character, what that character wants, obstacles in her path, and a sense of how the story works emotionally.

So being able to write a logline isn’t just developing a sales tool, a succinct blip to quickly communicate your story… it’s an exercise to help YOU understand the basic nut of your story, it’s primary narrative and emotional engine.  

THIS is the most important purpose of the logline… to laser-focus you on the core of your story.  Which is why I say: if you can’t tell your story in a single logline, you don’t yet know what that core is.  

Perhaps you’re trying to tell too many stories at once… perhaps you don’t fully understand your main character… but until you can articulate your story in one tight sentence, you still have some developing and pre-writing to do.

Anyway, Scott… I hope this helps (without sound too asshole-y)… and please keep reading and posting!  Coming up in the next few days, we have more Pitch Workshop entries, new movie reviews, some great new websites, and more!

Chad


Pitching | Reader Questions | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:42:17 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [3]
# Tuesday, October 14, 2008
PITCH WORKSHOP: ENTRY 4
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

Today’s submission to the Script Notes Pitch Workshop comes from Scott, who submits loglines for two feature ideas.  So before we dive in… Scott—thank you so much for sending these!  The Pitch Workshop is one of my favorite parts of doing this blog, and I always wish people would use it more.  So A) I really appreciate you submitting, and B) I hope this feedback—and the feedback you get from other readers—is helpful as you develop these ideas!

Having said that, let’s get started!  Here are Scott’s loglines…

1) THE SPITCHCOCKS, a feature comedy, is about four friends who form a famous rock band who implode in the most spectacular way. Now they must reunite for the biggest gig of their life.

2) THE DEVIL'S MONEY, a feature crime drama, is about corrupt Mexican police forces who battle during the search for a kidnapped teenager.


Now, normally, I like to look at different ideas separately, but today I want to look at these together, because I think they both have very similar strengths and weaknesses.

STRENGTHS:
One of the best things about both ideas is their strong sense of the “kind of movie” they want to be.  While each is just a logline with few details, I get a definite feel for each film… it’s like I can see snippets of each movie or their trailers… and I also get the sense that Scott, the writer, see much more of the canvas on which these stories are painted.  And that’s a great place for Scott to start from.


WEAKNESSES:
Firstly, Scott-- while both these ideas have great “backdrops,” I’m not sure what the actual STORIES are.  Story comes from a main character (or characters) having an incredibly strong WANT that forces him to take ACTION… and that action places him in conflict with OBSTACLES he must conquer or navigate.  And unfortunately, neither logline details a main character(s), what he/she wants, specific courses of action, or any tangible obstacles the hero might encounter.

Secondly—or maybe hand in hand—the loglines—while good at conveying a “sense of spirit”—are written in such broad generics (“the most spectacular way,” “the biggest gig of their life”) that while I believe YOU have a strong sense of these worlds, it’s tough for me to share in it.  I see MY version of “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life,” but I’m not really sure if my own imagination’s versions are accurate to your vision and story.  And your job, as a writer, is to communicate your own specific vision, not necessarily entice me with what MY vision could be.


So...

SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THESE:

1)  IDENTIFY YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS.  Does The Spitchcocks revolve around Larry, the band’s former lead singer, who wants to help his bandmates heal their animosity so they can reunite for one last enormous gig?  Is it about the drummer, Razor, who wants the band to play a charity concert to raise money for his baby’s life-saving surgery?  Or is it a straight-up ensemble piece… in which you identify the main characters as a unit?  For instance, are they now mid-forties, middle class suburban parents who must suddenly juggle day-jobs and parenting as they attempt to get in shape for a new tour?  Or are they poor late-twenties singles who broke up after a violent falling out?  Are they Midwestern bumpkins who somehow succeeded as a rap band—The Tractor Pulls—in the big city?  Or are they former hair metal rockers now out of place in a hip-hop world?  

Paint a picture of these guys so we can not only see them visually, but we “see” them emotionally and understand how the world looks to them.

The same goes for The Devil’s Money.  Does this story follow one particular cop, like Eric, a righteous cop trying to find a missing child amidst a city run by corruption?  Does it follow Charlie, the kidnapped kid’s father, desperately trying to work with corrupt officials to rescue his son?  Or is it an ensemble piece about District Battalion 89, the most corrupt police force in Mexico City, that must pull together to save this one particular kid?

Whether the story follows one person or a group, giving them a name and a few words of description will help us connect to them.


2)  WHAT DOES THIS MAIN CHARACTER WANT?  I hinted at this above—and specifying his want will also help flesh out your main character—but let us know exactly what your protagonist wants… both “tangibly” and “emotionally.”  Perhaps Norman, your main character in The Spitchcocks, wants to reunite his band so he can win the heart of his true love… a girl who used to be the world’s biggest Spitchcocks fan.  That may not be the story you want to tell, but it DOES give a sense of what Norman wants “tangibly”—A) a girl, and B) to reunite the band—and it lets us know what he wants “emotionally”… true love.  We understand how this onjective will drive Norman to action… and, because it has an emotional engine (we all understand the desire for true love), it allows us to invest emotionally in Norman’s quest.

Similarly, in The Devil’s Money, does your main character simply want to find the missing kid?  Or is your main character Carlos, a police chief who wants to rid his force of corruption… and their newest case—the missing kid—is the one he’s determined to use to rid his force of evil?  Or is your main character Jules, the kid who’s been kidnapped, and he desperately wants to be rescued… but learns the corrupt police force itself is behind his capture?

Whatever you decide for each story, knowing—and articulating—your characters’ wants is the engine that drives the narrative.  Put it up front, big and bold, in both your logline and your actual script.  Without it, the rest of your script is much less effective; but let your audience understand and relate to your hero’s want, and you’ve already taken a huge step toward constructing a successful story.


3)  SPECIFY THE EXACT ACTIONS YOUR MAIN CHARACTER(S) MUST TAKE TO ACCOMPLISH HIS/HER WANT.  The Spitchcocks, for instance, is about a band reuniting… so what tangible actions must be taken for this to succeed?  Do the band members live in different countries, so Hank, the frontman, but physically travel the globe in order to gather them all?  Is the lead singer in jail for pot possession… so your lead character—Toby, the bassist—must break him out and get him to the gig before he’s re-arrested?

In The Devil’s Money, you mention that corrupt cops are searching for a kidnapped kid… and there’s also a war between cops.  While I’m not sure which is your “A-story,” I think this will clear up when you pinpoint your main character’s want.  If the objective is to find the kid, what actions does this entail?  Do they have five internal suspects the main cop, Pepe, must interview, opening a world of corruption and scandal in Pepe’s own department?  Or must Pepe and his partner, Ricky, search for the missing child in Mexico’s dangerous and seedy underworld, which is more (or less) corrupt than the police force itself?


4)  WHAT IS YOUR HERO’S MAIN OBSTACLE?  Like identifying your characters’ wants and actions, we also need to know exactly what is preventing your main character(s) from succeeding.  Why can’t The Spitchcocks simply reunite?  Even if they now live on different continents, why can’t they just hop on a plane and get back together?  What is preventing their actions from accomplishing their goal?  Did the Spitchcocks break up over soapy and unresolved sexual/romantic tensions?  Do they have different artistic visions that constantly cause them to fight?  Does one of them have amnesia that has wiped his memory of all the songs?  

Likewise, how does a battle between corrupt cops interfere with them finding a missing kid?  Are the cops lazy and refuse to work?  Is this the child of an enemy faction’s chief, so the other cops refuse to look for him/her?  Do they not want to find this child because he possesses valuable information that could reveal and punish certain corrupt cops?

Whatever you decide, your obstacle needs to be large and dramatic enough that we immediately understand how it will impede our hero’s journey.  Like your character’s want, the best obstacles aren’t just “tangible” obstacles, they’re also are also “emotional” obstacles, forcing the character to confront something in his/her relationships with other people.  

For example, the reuniting Spitchcocks could be faced with the obstacle that they all live on different continents.  This is, obviously, a huge challenge to their reunion.  But it’s a STRONGER challenge if they live on those different continents because ten years ago, when they were together as a band, the lead singer, Jorge, married the drummer, Carrie, and had an affair with the bassist, Vince.

Lastly, Scott…


5)  AVOID WRITING IN GENERICS LIKE “MOST SPECTACULAR WAY” AND “BIGGEST GIG OF THEIR LIFE.”  Although loglines must use words sparingly, they must also be the right words to communicate your story accurately and with detail.  “Biggest gig of their life” may mean one thing to one reader… and an entirely different thing to another reader.  And what’s most important is that your reader understands what those moments mean to YOU.

Having said that, it doesn’t matter exactly what the Spitchcocks’ “biggest gig” is… or how “spectacularly” the Spitchcocks implode… as long as it’s the biggest “EMOTIONAL” gig of their life and the most “EMOTIONALLY” spectacular implosion they could have.  

For example, you could argue that the “biggest gig of their life” is that they’ve been invited to open for U2 for ONE NIGHT ONLY (the normal opener is out sick), and if it goes well, it could re-launch their career.  This could obviously be “the biggest gig of their life.”  

OR… “the biggest gig of their life” could be this: the lead singer Barry’s daughter is dying, and Barry doesn’t have the money for her surgery… so he reunites the band for a charity concert to raise $500,000 and save his child’s life.  This could also be the “biggest gig of his life.”  And—frankly—it may even be “bigger,” because the stakes are higher.

OR… perhaps The Spitchcocks is a wonky sci-fi comedy, and the band has been kidnapped by an alien race that tells them: “You have 24 hours to put together a concert of entirely new material… or we’ll destroy the planet Earth.”  Silly, I know—but with the right tone it could work… and THAT is certainly the “biggest gig of their life.”

What this basically boils down to, Scott, is your story’s STAKES (what your characters stand to lose if they fail in their quests)… and deciding/understanding what they are.  Once you know that, those are the specifics to plug into the vague holes left by “most spectacular way” and “biggest gig of their life.”


Anyway, Scott, I hope this is helpful!  Feel free to play, shape, mold, rework, tweak, polish… and resubmit.  

In the mean time, if other readers have loglines or summaries for the Script Notes Pitch Workshop, feel free to post them here, or shoot me an email at WDScriptNotes@FWPubs.com.

In the mean time, keep reading… we have some great posts coming up.  We’ll have more Pitch Workshop submissions… we’ll talk about how to protect your work… we'll help the American Idol writers earn fair pay, residuals, and health benefits… we'll have book reviews… and much, much more!


Pitching | Screenwriting (Film) | SCRIPT NOTES PITCH WORKSHOP | Writing Advice
Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:25:56 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [2]
# Friday, October 10, 2008
Free Theater Across America!
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

Huge thanks to my friend Hallie for cluing me into this, but this is awesome!  Free Night of Theater is a program designed in cooperation with Theater Communications Group and the Association of Performing Arts Service Organizations to get people out to see more live theater, introduce newbies to live performance, etc.... and it coordinates hundreds of theaters in cities across America!

Between October 16 and October 31, hundreds of theaters in Atlanta, St. Louis, Los Angeles, New York, Austin, San Diego, Cincinnati, Lexington, Indianapolis, Philadelphia, Kansas City, Portland, Boston, and almost 100 more cities will be offering FREE NIGHTS OF THEATER!

Click HERE for more info, or click HERE to find theaters near you... and enjoy a great night of live theater!


Events Activities and Things To Do | Fun Stuff | Theater
Friday, October 10, 2008 8:07:40 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, October 09, 2008
Letter from the WGA: Ozzy Doesn't Rock
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

You may have heard this news, which broke yesterday afternoon, but the Writers Guild of America is going to head with Ozzy Osbourne's new FOX variety show, The Osbournes: Loud and Dangerous, for refusing to pay its writers standard wages or agree to a union contract.  Yesterday afternoon, WGA presidents Michael Winship and Patric Verrone sent the following email to Guild membership...


To Our Fellow Members,

Last week, you may have become aware of our ongoing dispute with Tyler Perry’s production companies, which fired four writers because of their efforts to organize Perry’s series, House of Payne. Pickets were up at his new studio’s grand opening Saturday night in Atlanta.
 
Now, we write to inform you of another labor dispute.

Fox has ordered a primetime comedy-variety show featuring Ozzy Osbourne and his family, and has engaged FremantleMedia North America, the company behind American Idol, to produce it.  Because they wanted to hire WGA members to write the show, Fremantle contacted the WGAW to see if we would agree to a sub-standard contract.  Attempting to pay as little as possible to the writers on the show, Fremantle asked to treat it as “half-scripted” and pay greatly reduced writing fees to those writers who wrote skits, interview material, intros, and “outros.” Although all of the writing on the show is of a type traditionally covered by our MBA (in such shows as The Carol Burnett Show and Laugh-In), Fremantle wanted to treat certain portions of the show as “reality content," not cover the writers who create it, and lower the compensation of the WGA-covered writers, arguing that they would only be responsible for writing part of the show.
 
We refused to agree to such a deal because it would drastically undermine hard-won minimums and standards.  While we have covered some shows produced by Fremantle, they insist that other shows, including American Idol, The Price is Right, and Million Dollar Password, do not have writers and should not be covered by a WGA contract.

Now it is clear that Fremantle’s intention is to bring their low cost, non-union business model into traditional genres – first game shows, then comedy-variety. Soon, no WGA-covered writing will be safe from their aggressive undermining of our contract.  We cannot allow this encroachment to continue. 
 
Accordingly, WGA East and West members may not write for the Osbourne variety show (working title: The Osbournes: Loud and Dangerous).  Any members who perform writing services on that show do so at their own peril as they will be violating WGA Working Rule 8 and could be fined up to 100% of their compensation for that work.  Both Guilds notified agents and other representatives of this development through an Action Alert issued yesterday. 
 
The alert also reminded agents that they cannot send clients who are members of either Guild to write for Tyler Perry's production companies.  The WGAW has filed unfair labor practice charges based on the unlawful discharge of the House of Payne writers and continuing bad faith bargaining.  Members who accept these jobs will also be in violation of Working Rule 8.


We believe that denying Fremantle and Tyler Perry members of the Writers Guilds East and West may convince them that they will be unable to produce professional quality entertainment content and that they will see the wisdom and creative advantages of signing a WGA contract. 
 
There is already far too much writing done in our business by men and women without WGA benefits.  We cannot let writers of sitcoms and comedy-variety programming join their ranks, as we also work to reduce the amount of animation, reality, nonfiction, and other so-called “non-scripted” writing not covered by a WGA contract.

Thanks for your attention and your continued support.
 
Best,
 
Patric M. Verrone
President, WGAW
 
Michael Winship
President, WGAE


Industry Updates | Interesting Talking Points | Reality TV | Writing TV
Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:24:08 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Wednesday, October 08, 2008
MOVIE TALK: The Express
Posted by Chad

I tend to believe everyone has a story to tell, every life is unique, and the quality of a biography's storytelling usually depends on how you look at the life.  In other words, with the right storytelling, any life can be dramatic.  Or undramatic.

Never has this been more true than in the case of The Express, screenwriter Charles Leavitt and director Gary Fleder’s new film based on the short life of Syracuse University football star Ernie Davis (played by Rob Brown).

Davis isn’t the world’s most famous football player… or the world’s most famous civil rights activist… but he certainly did some remarkable things worthy of a story.  The problem is:

Leavitt and Fleder do little to make the actions and events of Davis’s life SEEM remarkable; they instead tell an overly-familiar, paint-by-numbers story of a young black athlete trying to come of age and play football in the racist mid-twentieth century.

To be fair, the opening seconds of the film show promise… it begins with college football teams facing off on the line.  “Ready for this, spook?” one of the white players sneers at Davis. “I’m gonna kick your black ass back to Africa.”  The play snaps into action, and Davis is buried under a mound of white players… who proceed to punch the shit out of him.

This “mini-scene” only lasts a few seconds, but it’s an effective way to kick off the movie.  Unfortunately, it’s the last scene with any bite for a long time… and most of the movie that follows doesn’t live up to the in-your-face violence of these opening moments.  It's not a "bad" movie; it's just uninspired and tame.

The story begins with Davis as a young boy growing up in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, where he’s harassed by white children… who try to beat him up but are too slow to catch him.  It’s obvious Davis has incredible football skills, but he doesn’t consider putting them to use until he and his mom move to Elmira, New York, where he becomes a high school football stud.  He’s also a top-notch student, and he eventually receives over fifty scholarship offers from various universities.

Meanwhile, at Syracuse University, head football coach Ben Schwartzwalder (Dennis Quaid) has a problem: his superstar player, Jim Brown, is graduating, leaving an unwelcome hole on the football team.  Schwartzlander has scoured the country looking for a replacement, but he’s found no one… until he watches a film of lightning-fast Davis on the gridiron.  At first, Schwartzlander doesn’t want to pursue Davis because black athletes are “too much trouble,” but with the help of Brown himself, he convinces Davis to give Syracuse a shot.

Much of The Express’s second act focuses on the Davis-Schwartzwalder relationship.  Davis is a black athlete who won’t use his celebrity to ruffle feathers and speak out against racism.  Schwartzwalder cares about only one thing—winning—and he’s willing to condone players’ and opponents’ racism in order to keep people happy and not jeopardize victories.  Over the course of the film, both Schwartzwalder and Davis come to realize “winning” is about something more.  Davis—prodded by his activist cousin Will (Nelsan Ellis)—learns he has a larger responsibility than simply scoring, and he begins speaking out against racism.  Schwartzwalder also begins standing up to racism (although thinking back on it, he really only does this one significant time).

The movie’s biggest flaw is that none of the racism… or the moments when Davis or Schwartzwalder stand up to it… ever seems all that fresh, palpable, or powerful.  This isn’t to diminish the evil of racism, it’s just to say that we’ve seen a LOT of movies about racism, and the racism in The Express seems… well… like “racism lite.”  Not that the racism itself is “lite,” but Leavitt and Fleder give it almost no visceral impact.  Sure, there’s a healthy dose of the “n-word,” and we see rednecks booing black players, and African-American athletes are told they can’t use front doors or sleep in white hotel rooms, etc., etc., etc.  But we’ve seen all this before… and this time, none of it lands with any force.  We don’t FEEL the pain of the racism because it’s all depicted in stale clichés.

As a result, Davis and Schwartzwalder never feel that heroic when they DO finally stand up injustices around them.  Sure, it’s an important moment when Davis—who has always avoided talking publicly about race—grows some sack and tells a reporter that when he’s on the field he only thinks about football, but “that doesn’t mean he forgets the color of his own skin.”  But come on… at a time when Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are taking enormous actions to overthrow the status quo, a flippant comment to a reporter feels a bit soft.

Now, I know what you’re thinking…

This isn’t the story of Martin Luther King or Malcolm X.  This is a smaller story, the story of a “normal” guy who takes a smaller—but no less important—stand.  And historically, you’re absolutely right.  Except for one thing…

In a good STORY, actions must feel huge.  Enormous.  GIGANTIC.  This doesn’t mean there can’t be tiny actions—like pouring a glass of tea or glancing wistfully at a stranger—but actions in a story must FEEL huge.  They must have massive emotional weight and impact.  A storyteller’s job, after all, is to HEIGHTEN action, so the audience feels as if these characters and actions—as they’re playing out—are the most important in the entire world.  And this is where The Express falls short.

If it wants to be a “smaller” story, a character study of a potential football legend who made brave choices (and all of us, no matter how “small,” should be making those same brave choices), fine—but it needs to go deeper into the complexities of Davis and his relationships.  But it doesn’t do this… Davis never transcends being a righteous hero to become a full-bodied, three-dimensional character with loves, fears, hatreds, inconsistencies and hypocrisies.  Neither does Schwartzwalder.

Thus, the movie is stuck in a tepid no-man’s-land… it paints by its numbers well enough to have some effective moments, but it never tackles its material hard enough to be truly powerful or special.

So I guess TODAY’S TAKE-AWAY SCREENWRITING LESSON IS…

Write fearlessly.  And I don’t mean that in a cheesy, write-from-the-heart kind of way… I literally mean: if you’re going to write something, write it to extremes.  If you’re writing a character who is cruelly racist, make him the cruelest racist ever seen in literature.  If you’re writing an action-packed car chase, make it the most thrilling car chase ever witnessed.  If you’re writing an angelic virgin, make her the purest character ever met.  If you’re writing a grotesque torture scene, make it the most stomach-churning sequence to be put on screen.  Do not be afraid offending anyone… do not play it safe… do not be afraid of “going too far.”  The human heart, head, and stomach can handle much more than we usually give them credit for… and I think writers and artists often believe they’re pushing boundaries, when—in actuality—the boundary is barely being touched.  

So while The Express in no way wants to be an “edgy” movie, I DO think that great storytelling—even in a family-friendly football movie—lives in extremes… and, as The Express proves, stories that refuse to go to extremes wind up going almost nowhere.  Or at least nowhere very interesting.

Having said all that… there’s almost nothing better than the sound of crashing football pads… especially when that sound is cranked full-blast over an awesome movie theater sound system.  Which means if the sound is good enough, almost any football movie will kick a little bit of ass.


THE EXPRESS TRAILER


Movie Talk
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:27:30 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Tuesday, October 07, 2008
GUEST PERSPECTIVE: Tyler Perry's House of Shame
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone--

A few days ago, I posted a piece about screenwriter Tyler Perry and the four writers he fired for attempting to organize his hit TBS show, House of Payne, according to Writers Guild standards. 

This weekend, the WGA hosted a protest at the grand opening of Tyler Perry Studios, in Atlanta.  Although I wasn't able to go, a fellow writer and WGA member, Vince, was on hand and sent me this report...

I flew from LA to Atlanta this weekend to support the four writers who were unjustly axed from Tyler Perry's "House of Payne" for the crime of trying to secure decent working conditions -- on a show that has already earned Perry's company about $300 million dollars in license and syndication fees!   I got into Atlanta Saturday afternoon, just in time to join the picket gathering outside the Tyler Perry Studios in southwest Atlanta, where Perry was hosting a black tie gala to celebrate the opening of his new movie lot.  Obviously, our goal was to send a message about Tyler Perry's abysmal labor practices to the Hollywood royalty he'd invited to the black tie affair.

With picket signs emblazoned with the slogan "Tyler Perry's House of Shame" in hand, we set up our picket line across the street and a few yards down the road from the studio gate (which, unfortunately, was as close as the local constabulatory would allow us to get to the studio.)   As it turned out, that didn't matter.   Despite our less than perfect proximity to the lot's entrance, we made sure we were seen--and heard--by every guest in every limo that made that sharp right turn into the studio gates.   As loud as we were, I'm fairly confident we were the talk of the celebs and well wishers who gathered on the red carpet a few yards just inside the gates.  

Fortunately, at least some members of the local press were willing to venture across the street to see what all the hubbub was about.  The Atlanta Journal-Constitution included a couple of scathing quotes from the picketers' side of the street in their coverage of the Perry gala the next morning.  We also spoke to a New York Times stringer, as well as a reporter from the local alternative weekly.   But the best coverage of the day came from the local CBS affiliate, who filmed us for a piece they ran the next morning.   According to one of our people, who happened to have the TV on when that piece was broadcast the next morning, the local news anchor teased the story by announcing, "Coming up next: Tyler Perry throws a big party at his new studio...but all is not well outside the gates. Stay tuned."   If nothing else, we definitely prevented the local media from settling for the kind of fawning coverage Tyler must have been hoped for.

Even more effective than the Saturday night event outside the studio was the picket we organized the following morning in front of Tyler Perry's mansion, where the mogul was hosting a Sunday Morning gospel brunch.  Unlike the night before, this time we managed to set up our line directly across the street from the millionaire's front gate, in full view of every limo and town car that pulled into the mogul's gated driveway.

Beyond the positive press we were able to generate for the cause, I think the weekend offered a well needed morale boost for the four fired writers.  They had to be heartened by the near unanimous support we got from every one of the few community people who managed to get through the police line to our picket line on Saturday night.    Once they heard the woeful story of our writers' unceremonious firing four days earlier, most of these locals were more than happy to grab a sign and march right along with us.   One outspoken local was a beautician who insisted that her two teenaged sons join our picket as well.  Another, an older woman and self described Tyler fanatic, insisted that she was "shocked in awe" to discover how poorly Tyler treated his workers.  Before she left, she vowed to post a message on the Tyler Perry fan website demanding that the star explain himself.  Equally gratifying was the local, and very vocal, Atlanta SAG member who took it on herself to lead most of our pointed chants.   We were also joined by a local, and very vocal, Atlanta SAG member, as well as a handful of folks who worked below the line on some of Perry's other shows.   One supporter who sometimes worked as prop man actually turned down a chance to work at the party that night in order to stand with us outside the gates.

All in all, it was clearly a worthwhile event, and provided a righteous kick-off to what I hope is a very short campaign to convince Tyler Perry to do right by his writers!



Thanks to Vince for the front-lines report... and to all the writers and friends-of-writers who showed up to help Perry's staff fight for fair wages, residuals, and health and pension plans!

Click HERE to sign the WGA's letter of support... and to join the Guild's fight against Tyler Perry and unfair labor practices and to help fired writers Kellie Griffin, Christopher Moore, Teri Brown-Jackson, and Lamont Ferrell!


Guest Perspectives | Interesting Talking Points | Writing TV
Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:10:19 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Monday, October 06, 2008
Write Your TV Spec... Just in Time for Staffing Season!
Posted by Chad

Hey, guys--

Just wanted to let you know: I'm teaching a new TV spec-writing class, starting next week, and the folks at Mediabistro said I could give Script Notes readers a $50 discount!

The class is a ton of fun... and a ton of work... but it's designed to give you a finished TV spec script (a sample episode of a show currently on the air), just in time for staffing season... which will kick into gear next spring.

So if you'd like to learn how to write a spec, or work on your 30 Rock or Californication or Criminal Minds or Bones script in a workshop setting, this is a great experience.  We'll not only go through the workshop process of writing the script, we'll talk about which shows make good specs, what to do with your script when it's finished, what else you need to do to break into the writers room, how to get an agent, etc.

The class begins next Thursday, October 16, and meets for ten Thursdays until January 8 (we'll take off for Christmas and New Years).  Here's some more information...

WHEN     10 weeks, Thursdays, October 16 - January 8, 7-10 pm
WHERE   Beverly Hills, CA
LEVEL     Intermediate
MORE INFO:  Click HERE

PRICE
    $610 ($575 for ) - and $50 off for Script Notes readers (To receive your discount, please call Katherine Dagenhart at 212-547-7886.)

From the Mediabistro website...

You want to write for TV, and you've mastered the basics of meeting deadlines, wordcount, and editing. Now you're ready to get your script off the ground. In this class, you'll start and finish the first draft of your sitcom or one-hour drama spec script. Each week, you will bring in the amount of pages for your spec script that your instructor requires. Each student will read his or her work (with the help of fellow "actors" in the class), and the teacher and students will take turns critiquing the piece while adding suggestions for making it tighter. The entire last class will be devoted to reading final drafts and learning how to get your script into the right hands. Class is also heavy on TV clips and sample scripts.

In this class, you will learn:

  • Everything there is to know about the TV business from an industry expert
  • The rules for creating characters that are true
  • Structure: How to "break for commercial," find a good ending, wrap things up seamlessly
  • The secret behind perfect dialogue
  • Subplots: Where to put them, how to tie them in

By the end of class, you will have:
A complete spec script of a one-hour drama or sitcom.

Admission requirements:
Please submit a letter of interest (including a brief work history), and a writing sample (less than 2,000 words).


Classes Seminars Workshops | Writing TV
Monday, October 06, 2008 8:41:43 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Saturday, October 04, 2008
BOOK REVIEW: Animation Unleashed
Posted by Chad

Hey, everyone—

A few years ago, I wrote a screenplay which (unfortunately) never sold, but got me a bunch of meetings around town… including a meeting with the Disney animation department.  It wasn’t an animated movie, but it had some elements that were very animation-ish, so they asked me if I’d be interested in coming up with some other animated ideas I could pitch.  Which I did.

And none of them sold.

In fact, none of them were very good.

At the time, I think I kinda sensed they weren’t that great (except my idea for an animated Marco Polo movie, which I still think would be awesome), but I wasn’t sure what was wrong with them, or why they didn’t seem as fresh or exciting as they should’ve.

And now I know why…

I hadn’t read Animation Unleashed, a new book from Canadian animator Ellen Besen.

I’ll be honest: I’ve never been super-inclined to do animation.  I enjoy it, and the past few years have given us some OUTSTANDING animated films (The Incredibles and Wall-E are two of my favorite movies EVER).  But I think great animated writers “think in animation”… which is something I simply don’t do.

Having said that, Animation Unleashed: 100 Principles Every Animator, Comic Book Writer, Filmmaker, Video Artist, and Game Developer Should Know is a terrific book not only for writers and artists working in animation, but for any writer or artist who wants to think about their own non-animated work in new ways.

Before describing what Animation Unleashed IS, let me tell you what it’s NOT.  Animation Unleashed is NOT a book that teaches you how to draw.  It’s not a book that teaches you how animated movies or comics get made.  It also doesn’t teach you the rules of narrative structure or storytelling; you won’t get a beat-for-beat breakdown of Finding Nemo or Madagascar.

What Animation Unleashed does incredibly well, however, is explain the creative and practical principles of animation.  The book begins by detailing some basic creative theories behind good animation: using analogy as storytelling, “simplifying and exaggerating” animated elements to let them be more representational, uses of caricature, etc.

Now, lemme say two things…  

ONE:  this is NOT an academic theory book.  I’m not usually a huge fan of academic film theory, especially when it doesn’t serve to make people better filmmakers or artists… but Besen explains things in practical terms that make everything applicable to the creative process.  She’s not interested in simply analyzing animation; she’s interested in helping people MAKE animation… and she succeeds 100%.  (Like I said, I’m not really an animation guy, but Besen made me understand, appreciate, and think about animation in ways I had never before bothered to.)

TWO:  I don’t think anything Bresen says is necessarily earth-shattering… yet what makes this book so valuable, at least for me (as a non-animation guy), is that it makes me think about how animation works differently from other kinds of storytelling.  And in doing that, it forces me to think about animation’s unique techniques and philosophies and how to apply them to my own writing.

In her chapter about actual script-writing, for example, Besen talks about how animation tends to be a more visual medium than other kinds of filmmaking, so it’s often helpful to write action first… then add dialogue later.  I think she’s absolutely right… but I think this also applies to regular movies and storytelling.  Or, at the very least, screenwriters should be focusing as much as possible on telling stories visually, not verbally.  Not necessarily a groundbreaking revelation… but by giving animated worlds and examples,  Besen got me thinking about my own “traditional” writing in ways and contexts that I hadn’t before.

Some of Besen’s most provocative chapters are those about sound, timing, camera angles, and performance.  These are easily the most “animation-specific” chapters, but they’re also the ones that made me think about my own work in the newest, most challenging ways.  

In her great chapter about sound, Besen talks about using dialogue sparingly… and even how/when to use gibberish or pure silence instead of actual words.  I don’t know if I’ve ever written—or needed to write—a character who speaks in gibberish, but Besen’s point is that genuine WORDS aren’t always the best vehicle for conveying emotional intent.  It’s a point well-taken.  As a writer, I think it’s easy to fall in love with our words—with actual letters on our page—but Besen does a great job of reminding us that words are far less important than characters' actions or the emotions behind them.

Ultimately, Besen’s book was a surprisingly engaging read, and I recommend it for two reasons:

ONE: it’s a great guide for helping animators think about everything from writing to shot composition in ways that will help them execute it practically.  Again, it may not teach you HOW to write or draw… but it helps you think about exactly WHAT to write and draw (and WHY you want to write and draw what you want to write/draw-- which I is often key to doing it well).

TWO: whether you’re a screenwriter, novelist, playwright, or poet, I think you’ll find this book helps you view your own work from a new perspective.  Next time I’m blocked when writing a scene or an outline, this will be one of the first writers-block-busters I’ll turn to.  After all, what better way to crack writers block than to imagine how to tell your scene (or story) simply through sound design?  Or with no dialogue?  Or as a wholly animated sequence?  That-- no matter what kind of writer you are-- in an indispensable resource.

So check it out and lemme know what you think...

In the mean time, I’ll be spending this weekend at the L.A. Chocolate Salon.  Which means next time I post, I’ll probably be about fifty pounds fatter.  Fortunately, you won’t be able to tell over the blog…

(Coming up: we’ll talk about how to register and protect your work, we’ll have new entries in the Script Notes pitch workshop, special guests, and more!...)


Animation | Books Tools Resources
Saturday, October 04, 2008 2:44:43 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Friday, October 03, 2008
Atlanta's TV Writers Need You... Tomorrow!
Posted by Chad

Hey, writers--

If you live in Atlanta, Georgia (or want to take a road trip), there's gonna be some exciting writerly/political action this weekend.  Here's the scoop...

Earlier this week, four writers were fired from Tyler Perry's hit TV show, House of Payne, which currently airs on TBS.  Why were they fired?  ...Because House of Payne isn't a Writers Guild show, and the writers wanted Perry to organize under the WGA so they could get fair pay, health benefits, and residuals.  You can read the whole story HERE (New York Times).

And for those of you who don't know House of Payne, it's the syndicated series from mini-mogul Tyler Payne, the writer/director of Madea's Family Reunion, The Family That Preys, Daddy's Little Girls, etc.

Not only is it COMPLETELY ILLEGAL to fire employees for trying to organize, but Perry's House of Payne deal is valued between $200-$300 million dollars... which is more than enough to pay his writers standard union writers and benefits.

So here's where things get fun...

The WGA is staging a massive protest tomorrow, October 4, at the opening of Perry's new Tyler Perry Studios in Atlanta... and if you're available to go, they need everyone they can get!  This isn't just a fight for the four writers (Kellie Griffin, Christopher Moore, Teri Brown-Jackson, Lamont Ferrell) fired from House of Payne.  This is a fight for writers and aspiring writers everywhere.  (Especially since Tyler Perry bills himself as a "maverick" who bucks the Hollywood system and does thing on his own terms.)  Here's the scoop...

WHAT:    The WGA Protest of Tyler Perry Studios
WHEN:   Saturday, October 4, 2008
             4:00 p.m.
WHERE: Tyler Perry Studios
             2769 Continental Colony Pkwy SW
             Atlanta, GA

If you can't make it but would like to donate money, or frequent flier points, to help fly other writers or WGA members to the protest, please contact Charles Allen at the Writers Guild asap.  You can reach him at 323-782-4565, or email him at callen@wga.org.

You can also CLICK HERE to sign the WGA's letter of support for Kellie Griffin, Christopher Moore, Teri Brown-Jackson, and Lamont Ferrell.

Thanks for your help!


Events Activities and Things To Do | Writing TV
Friday, October 03, 2008 11:11:01 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Wednesday, October 01, 2008
READER QUESTION/GUEST PERSPECTIVE: Is It Possible to Balance Single Parenthood and a Writing Career?
Posted by Chad

Hey, folks—

Today’s reader question comes from E. Daniels, who asks:

“Is it possible for writers to balance a career and family?  With all the talk of being trapped in a room for 14 hours, I'm wondering if it's even possible to be a single parent and make a living as a TV writer, particularly given that most people move away from their families/support systems to start their career in Los Angeles.  Thoughts?”

Well, E. Daniels… I’ll be honest: I’m not a single parent, so I didn’t feel fully qualified to answer this question myself.  Which is why I tracked down someone who did… my friend Jennifer Vally, one of the other writers here on Reality Binge.  Jen has written on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, The Late Late Show with Craig Kilbourn, Reality Remix, Street Smarts, and many more shows for both broadcast and cable networks… AND she’s raised two daughters.

Jen was really gracious in letting me pick her brain for a while.  So without further adieu, here’s Jennifer Vally…

CHAD:  How did you begin working as a TV writer?  How did you get to where you are now?  Tell me about your path?
JENNIFER:  I started as an actress in plays in high school… in San Diego… and college.  I went to junior college in Orange College, and my second year I was hired by a professional theater group and I did summer stock.  From there, I decided I wanted to move to L.A. and find my fame and fortune.  

I didn’t find my fame and fortune right away, but I was very ambitious.  I always produced stuff, got myself on stage.  I joined a comedy sketch improv group and we got to be pretty famous.  We opened for Garry Shandling; we went around the country.  And then I got tired of writing by committee so I started doing stand-up.  And from stand-up, people started asking me to write jokes.  One of my very good friends who would ask me to write jokes got a job writing on The Keenan Ivory Wayans Show, and that was all I needed.  I was like, “if he can get it, I can get the job.”  So I got a job working on that show.  

Around that time, I was reading in the paper about the Oxygen network, and I said, “Boy, this is something I should really check: a network for women.”  Because even as I was working, I would be the only woman writing [on staff], or one of two, or one of a few.  So when I heard about the Oxygen network, I got very excited.  I literally did all the networking myself; I had no agent.  I just found out they were going to do twelve shows [and] called down to Sunset Gower, [where] I heard they were setting up production offices.  I hounded them and sent my stuff and they hired me to write for the show.  I was the only female writer, writing for a show called I’VE GOT A SECRET for two years… I wrote 112 episodes all by myself.  From there, it just evolved and I got jobs working on different shows.


Where in that timeline did you have your children?
I actually started doing stand-up when I was six months pregnant with my youngest one.  The day I had my child I was performing at The Laugh Factory.  I got offstage, my water broke, and I went to the hospital and had Hannah—the same exact night I performed.

It was tough because I was single.  I don’t have any immediate family in the area.  My parents are from overseas, my mother lives in San Diego, I have no relatives.  So I had to do everything on my own, [like] find sitters.  In the beginning, I had to take my kids with me to comedy clubs and have other comics watch my kids while I did my set.


How was that lifestyle for your kids?  Did they like it?  Did they understand what you were doing?
They couldn’t come to a lot of the gigs… because they’re in clubs; you have to be twenty-one.  But [one time, I was performing at a sober house and took my oldest daughter].  And I was telling some jokes and she got up and ran out of the room, in the middle of my set, crying!  Afterwards, I went after her and she was like, “I had no idea this is what you did!  You talk about me!”  I hadn’t even said anything about them!  I’d said that I had kids and she was mortified and ran away screaming!  It was horrible.  But then, when I started getting jobs on TV… then they were excited about it.


You've been working steadily as a TV writer for many years, so you have good traction and many contacts.  But starting out as a TV writer is a much different ballgame than continuing to work once your career is moving.  What are the biggest challenges, both personal and professional, faced by a single parent just trying to break in?
My advice to someone would be: CREATE YOUR OWN OPPORTUNITIES.  So many times people come to this town and give themselves deadlines.  People say, “I’m giving this six months, and I if I don’t make it, or if I don’t get a job in six months, I’m leaving.”  Well, you might as well just leave, because you are setting yourself up for failure.  Nothing is going to happen that quickly.  It’s all perseverance, working hard.


But how can people do this?  If someone moves to town with almost no contacts, how can they "create their own opportunities?"
Years ago, I started this cable access show.  This is a way someone new to town could [do something].  For thirty-five dollars, they’ll teach you how to edit and do all this stuff, and there are many cable access networks in the city.  You can use their facilities to tape whatever you want for two hours, with a crew, for forty bucks.  It’s professional quality stuff, so I did a show called Chick TV, and from that show I won two grants: a grant from the NEA, [and another] from private foundations, because it was a comedy show featuring women.  You just create your own opportunities.

There are writers groups all over L.A.  I get emails from friends of mine who are starting up writers groups all the time; someone writes a screenplay, or even just a page, and they’ll go with other writers and read each other’s work.  Or have actors say them out loud.  So even if you’re not working, you can still get your words read by other people… and see if you’re gong on the right track.

Also… UCLA and all these places have extension courses where you can take screenwriting classes and other things.  I’ve never done that, but people say they like it.

If you’re coming from out of town, I’d [also] suggest getting a job anywhere in show business.  I’ve worked on a lot of productions where even the simple P.A. moves up to another position.  So if you’re new and don’t know anybody, take a job anywhere at a production company.  Even if it’s just answering the phones, be nice, show them you’re creative, slip your head in; after you know the place, slip them a few jokes, some samples.  They’ll take a look at it because they know you and they know your work ethic.


Production assistant jobs are pretty low-paying gigs.  Is it possible to be a P.A. and support your family or raise children?
You’ll have to come out with some money saved because P.A.’s don’t make much money and work longer hours.  But that’s the best way for someone with absolutely no contacts or experience to get their foot in the door.


Is it possible to work as a full-time P.A., with a part-time job on the side?  Could you work as a P.A. during the week, but also work at a restaurant, or a movie theater, or as a secretary?
You might be able to.  [A girl in my office now] was our very own example.  She’d work on the weekends as a nanny and a P.A. during the week.


As you said, P.A.'s-- or any low-level entertainment positions-- often work brutally long hours for very little pay.  How does this impact your ability to be a good parent?  Can you still be a good mom or dad while working as a P.A.?
That’s something you have to really work at.  If you have a lunch break, you can run home.  When I first started working long hours at Oxygen, I literally had to have a team of handlers.  I would take the kids to school in the morning, then I had someone who would pick them up in the afternoon, someone else who would take them to their things, and someone else who would stay with them at night.  It’s tough.  Your weekends are very precious, and any down-time you have, you come… or you have them brought to the set.  You spend as much time [with them] as you can.  

The thing about working as a writer—or anything in show business—there are periods of unemployment.  [Also,] when you are working, you make enough money that you should learn to manage it [and] save it, so when you aren’t working, you don’t have to stress.  That’s when I catch up on all that mommy time.


That brings up a good point: being a TV writer is an incredibly unstable job.  Sometimes you work for many months; other times there are long dry spells of unemployment.  How do you and your family survive the dry spells... both financially and emotionally?
Keeping busy helps.  There are all kinds of freelance writing jobs you can do from home: grant-writing, writing for websites, writing for different organizations.  You’re not going to make the same amount of money, but at least you’re still keeping in it.

What’s great about [times of unemployment] is: that’s when you can volunteer at your kids’ school.  I was PTA president for six years at my daughter’s middle school.  So I was either involved 100% or involved 20%.  It gives you a chance to be involved in your kids’ lives when you wouldn’t have the opportunity otherwise.  If you were working a nine-to-five job every day of the year, you wouldn’t have those opportunities, so it’s nice to have down-time every once in a while.


What are some other advantages you find working as a TV writer?  Some things you feel you've "gained" being a single mom writing for television?  Advantages in your personal life you wouldn't find if you had another job?
It gives you enough money to send your kids to the dance lessons, the gymnastic lessons.  So when you are working, they’re keeping busy, because you don’t want your kids to slip away or slip through the cracks or get in trouble.  Because I hate to say it, but if you have money, you have the resources to give them opportunities you wouldn’t working at a regular job.


And the follow-up question: are there things you feel you've lost, or personal disadvantages from working in television?
I don’t think so, because when my kids see me working, happy, productive, and being able to raise a family, that reflects on the kids.  I’m happy, so they’re happy.


How much harder is it to break into TV-writing if you're a single parent?
It’s just another job, so when you’re a mother you learn how to juggle a career and have kids.  But I will mention that for a woman, especially when you want to go into comedy, it’s a LOT harder.  The truth is: most guys—and I did comedy for years—they don’t think women are funny.  That’s the bottom line: “women aren’t funny.”  So you just have to break into that boys club.  I’ve worked on several shows where I was the only woman… or one of two.  So there’s that disadvantage, too.  But if you’re talented, people will hire you.


Breaking into TV-writing is always tough, but it's even tough for out-of-towners.  What advice would you give a single parent who lives out of town, but is considering moving to L.A., to help him/her make the transition?  What can he/she do before moving to L.A. to help the move-- and the professional transition-- go more smoothly?
If you haven’t done any writing in your hometown, I’d suggest you do as much of that as you can before you come out here.  I’m sure there are plenty of opportunities in any city to be in a theater group and write a play, or local news, or the local entertainment show. It’s hard to break in here unless you have a little bit of experience or are willing to take the time.  [Especially] if you’re coming out with NO experience, stay in your hometown a bit longer, get SOME experience, even if it’s just sitting at home writing a screenplay [or] spec script, then send it to people in Los Angeles before you make the move.  Get some advice, see if it’s the right move for you.


We always hear that in order to have a TV-writing career, you must live in Los Angeles.  is that true?  Does an aspiring TV writer need to live in L.A.?
Not in this day and age.  Every major city has the news, the “Good Morning, Mike & Mary,” plays, theater.  Start in your town before you come out.


Earlier you suggested people just moving to L.A. should start at the bottom as a P.A. or other low-level position.  But if you've spent many years building to a level of success in another industry... as a doctor or lawyer or secretary or fireman... it's tough to begin again.  If you've been successful in one career and decide to try your hand at writing, do you really need to begin at the bottom?
Yes.  If you have a field you’re already an expert in, find [writing] jobs doing that.  There are always writing positions in every job—law offices, doctors.  Everyone needs someone writing something for them, so start by writing for the doctors or the lawyers.


If you were advising a single parent just beginning a career as a TV writer, what are the top 3 "do's" you would offer him/her?  What are thre three things he/she should be sure to do to balance parenthood and a professional life?
Number one: have good samples of your work, whether it’s a play, a short story, a spec script, a bunch of scripts.  Have some samples to show.

[Number two:] do your homework.  Find out what kinds of job you want… what your niche is, what your specialty is.  Have in mind what you want to do before you set out.  I like variety, so that’s what I’ve been going for.  I like writing jokes, I like writing sketches.  

A friend of mine created a long-running sitcom, and she used to call me, crying about the hours.  Literally, she was working 18-20 hour days.  That job wouldn’t have worked for me with my kids.  As lucrative as it was, I just couldn’t do it.  So find what you like and go for it.  Do you want to be a sitcom writer?  Do you want to work on hour dramas?  Do you want to work on a talk show?  Watch TV shows you like and see what production companies make those shows. Then arget those specific companies.  Do some research and see if there’s a way in.

Number three: don’t expect help from anybody.  You have to do it all on your own.  Create your own opportunities.  Don’t wait for somebody to give you a job.  Be proactive.  When I was doing that chick TV show, I would put out ads in looking for women, different talent.  I’d talk to these women and say, “What do you do to further your career?”  “Oh, I wait for my agent to call me.”  Well, that’s not how it works.  You have to find your own jobs, create your own opportunities.  If you want to be a writer, hook up with an actress; write her something and do a one-woman show or a play.  Then you can invite people from the industry to see your work.


What are the top 3 "don't's" you would recommend?
You should NOT give yourself a deadline, a timeline, because that’s just setting yourself up for failure.

Don’t come to L.A. to be a writer if you’re doing it just for the money.  You’ve heard writers make lots of money and that’s why you do it.  You will fail.  You have to do it because you love it and that’s what you want to do; you would do it regardless of whether you’re making a lot of money or not.

Don’t be afraid to knock on doors you think will be closed: you never know.  Let’s say you love reality shows and would love to work behind the scenes on Survivor.  Don’t be afraid to go to Mark Burnett Productions and say, “Can I do something here?”  They need P.A.’s every day of the week… and people fall out all the time.

[And lastly,], don’t let anybody squash your dreams.  If you have dreams, go for it, but be proactive, that’s my number-one thing.  Don’t expect to have anyone really help you.  Don’t sit around and wait for someone to give you a job.  You have to do it on your own.  If you want to be a writer, write every day, even if it’s just writing in a journal.


Career Advice | Guest Perspectives | Reader Questions | Writing TV
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 8:57:08 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [1]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links