|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2008 (3) |
| October, 2008 (4) |
| September, 2008 (4) |
| August, 2008 (4) |
| July, 2008 (5) |
| June, 2008 (4) |
| May, 2008 (5) |
| April, 2008 (5) |
| March, 2008 (7) |
| February, 2008 (8) |
| January, 2008 (4) |
| December, 2007 (4) |
| November, 2007 (4) |
| October, 2007 (7) |
| September, 2007 (4) |
| August, 2007 (6) |
| July, 2007 (4) |
| June, 2007 (9) |
| May, 2007 (7) |
| April, 2007 (9) |
| March, 2007 (5) |
| February, 2007 (3) |
| January, 2007 (1) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Life Changingly Awesome Query Letter Part 6: The New York Times Book Review
Dear Mr. Sam Tanenhaus, In my opinion, there are three things that every man should do before he dies: 1. Ride a jet ski 2. Write a harshly worded letter to an online retailer and 3. Read The Mummy, the Will and the Crypt by John Bellairs. As a frail, precocious, but obviously gifted youth, I read said book, the sequel to Bellair's first Johnny Dixon mystery The Curse of the Blue Figurine, and was enraptured by the excitement, enthralled by the intrigue, and en fuego-ed by chapter ending lines like this: "Johnny could make out what the woman was saying. And the words made the hairs on the back of his neck stand on end." You're probably asking yourself right now: What were those words?!? Well, Bellairs made you wait till the following chapter to find out. And sometimes, depending on whether or not you'd had a nap after your snack, that could be the next day. But despite producing Mach 3 Turbo sharp suspense like that in 15 young adult books, Bellairs, according to a fairly accurate sounding Wikipedia entry, died in relative obscurity in Haverhill, MA, where, according to its tourism website picture gallery, the most interesting thing to do seems to involve a statue of a woman captured by Native Americans in 1697. And perhaps more importantly, Bellairs work was never featured in the Times Book Review. "Until Sam Tanenhaus accepted an idea that would change his life forever. In a good way. From Kevin Alexander." That idea, Samuel, is to write a 2000 word essay celebrating the 25th anniversary of the first publication of The Mummy, the Will and the Crypt. Although the essay will feature a lot of interesting behind-the-scenes tidbits about Bellairs and the book I mentioned before, especially why the illustration on the front of said book portrays the main character Johnny Dixon without a mouth and wearing embarrassingly tight, tapered blue pants, it will mainly re-focus on my childhood, and my painful but minor battle with slight iron deficiency. I can also do illustrations, for a nominal fee. Now Sammy, I a fool am not. I understand that the literary rigors of writing for the Times Sunday Review are, um, rigorous. You, the Internet 2.0 has led me to believe, even had to write a book called Literature Unbound, and this while you were in your 20s! Although sadly my father didn't donate enough money to his alma mater Dartmouth to get me wait-listed at an Ivy League school, I too am cultured. I've heard of or asked Yahoo!Answers about nearly every classic American author, I've seen the movie version of Jhumpa Lahiri's The Namesake, and I own cuff links and an English-French dictionary. But I'm much more than that. Because you don't have to be a Michael Crichton scholar or know the French word for grapefruit (pamplemousse!) to understand the American literary landscape, especially when most of what you're planning on turning in involves personal anecdotes. In the movie Rounders, Matt Damon says something to the effect that--during a game of poker-- you must put a man to a decision for all of his chips. Well, Samson, all of my chips are on the proverbial table. You've heard my opening statement, you know my argument, you've seen the evidence. It's time you found me guilty of an invincible idea, and sentenced me to 2000 words, preferably at $2 a pop. My contact info will follow. And if you need to get in touch quickly, just friend me on Facebook, then write your message on my wall. Part Time(s), LoverStevie Wonder
12/11/2007 11:26:18 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 04, 2007
The Special Edition Deleted Column with Director's Commentary
Hello Friends. You know how--when you, um hypothetically, buy the DVD of The Notebook-- there are all those special features and deleted scenes with Rachel McAdams and Ryan Gosling that you're so glad you got a chance to see, because they really have a great chemistry? Well consider this blog entry a sort of writing deleted scene fresh from the floor of the editorial cutting room. What you're about to read is an entry I wrote for my This Writer's Life column that wasn't used because it focused entirely too much on my personal as opposed to my professional writing life. Rather than just burying it in the time capsule in my backyard with the rest of my rejected works, I thought it would make a nice teaching point to show that--even after three years of writing a column--I still get things rejected. Plus, with global warming and everything, I think it's part of my duty to recycle, especially 1100 words worth of material. Anyway, here she is, for no extra charge, my Special Edition Deleted Column.
The Best of, What's Around
DMBSeveral weeks ago, I got a call from my mother. Normally, I get lots of calls from my mother, most of them focused around the infrequency with which I answer my phone, but I could tell from the tone of her voice that this was more serious. She informed me that my grandmother had rather unexpectedly gotten very sick very fast and that there was little that could be done. After a few moments of stunned silence, my mom then informed me that my grandmother had a request. She wanted me to write something for her to be read at an upcoming family gathering. “Did she specify what she wants me to write?” I asked my mom, hoping what she really wanted was some sort of 3 or 4 line rhyming poem, a pre-pubescent Kevin Alexander specialty. But I wasn’t going to get off that easy. “Whatever you want to do is fine, dear,” my mom said. “Grandma said you’d know just what to write.” After I hung up with my mom, I sat and thought about what I was going to do. I felt both honored and extremely nervous. I was upset, of course, as I love my grandmother and she’s played a large part in raising me and sickness and loss are never easy to deal with, but I also knew she was older now and she’d lived a great life and so I couldn’t pretend that a small part of my mind wasn’t expecting something like this. And seeing how I’m the only one in my family who writes anything longer than a grocery list, my grandparents had long ago asked me to write and read their eulogies when they passed. As a writer in a family of non-writers, you come to expect to handle these types of tasks, and, personally, I think they’re the most rewarding. Don’t get me wrong, I love and crave the vanity and personal pleasures of seeing my name in print and spend upwards of twenty minutes a day Googling myself in new and creative ways, but there is something so intimate and honorable about being given the chance to celebrate the life of someone you loved, something so emotionally powerful and important that you can’t help but be taken in by it. Writing is one of those rare skills that afford you the chance to take thought, emotion and coherency and put it towards the memory of another. But writing something honoring someone’s life after they’re gone is one thing. Doing it while they’re still alive is a completely different story. I spent the next week or so in a daze, my work falling off, my head clouded by the task at hand. No matter what I’m writing, I tend to go through three stages during the writing process. The first is elation, because I’m so excited about getting a new assignment. This usually consists mostly of me bragging to my friends about the cool and unique opportunity I’ve been afforded and why my life is so much more artistically profound than theirs. Other people tend not to like my elation phase. Standing in direct contradiction is the second phase, which could be most aptly summed up as the despondency phase. It’s during this phase that I realize the weight and breadth of said task, and begin to, in the words of my roommate, “lose my shit”. The one positive aspect of this phase is that my apartment gets very, very clean. The final phase is, of course, the “you’ve left yourself with no time to do anything else so you better sit your ass down and finish this before you get fired” phase, which is pretty much self-explanatory. Because of the uniqueness of this assignment and the limited time frame I was working in, I seemed to be experiencing all three phases simultaneously. I was obviously excited, but that excitement was crippled by a horrible fear of failure, and a voice in the back of my head that kept reminding me of the importance of the task at hand. Talking to Ramsey didn’t help much either. “Dude, you have to make this perfect, like some Gettysburg Address/Good Will Hunting type shit,” he said, when I told him about what I was expected to do. “Wow. That’s a lot of pressure. If I was you, I’d probably have completely freaked out and—as you know—I pretty much dominate pressure situations.” My main problem was that I didn’t know what sort of thing to write. Should it be some sort of eulogy-esque remembrance or a nostalgia-inducing poem or something funny to rise spirits? Should I get other family members involved? What about word count? After another week of sleepless stress, I finally decided to ask my grandfather. I’d been putting off talking to him about it, mostly because I feared that any more talk of my grandmother’s sickness would be too stressful for him. And, if I’m being honest with myself, I also kept quiet because I secretly fear bringing up sad or distressing topics, often taking painful lengths to avoid talking about them while internally freaking out. Not exactly healthy, I know. So it shouldn’t have come as a surprise that my grandfather was more than happy to talk about it. And when I asked about what specifically I should do, he laughed. “Kevin, Kevin, Kevin,” he said. “You think your grandmother will be concerned about the form of whatever you present? She’d be thrilled if you read from a science book, as long as it was you doing it. Just do something that will let her know how much we care about her. Maybe you make us laugh a little, maybe you make us cry, whatever, just so she knows we’re there and we’re thinking about her.” My grandfather paused for a little. “Oh, and one other thing.” “Yeah?” “Just make sure it’s not another one of those damn rhyming poems.” Freed from the shackles of my own mind, I wrote the entire thing one afternoon at my mother’s house, looking through some old pictures and albums. I’m presenting it to the family in three days. Hopefully, there are things in there to make our family laugh, cry and remember just what my grandmother means to us. And perhaps most importantly, none of it rhymes.
12/4/2007 2:57:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 27, 2007
On Deadlines and Self Examination
I am working on a deadline for Boston Magazine. The deadline is this Thursday. And, at the moment, that seems manageable. I am (mostly) done with the reporting, I have (partially) transcribed the interviews, I even (vaguely) know what I'm trying to say. Of course, there are other things for me to do as well, smaller-ish things, like preparing a presentation about the mechanics and literary devices employed by Philip Roth when beginning and ending chapters in The Human Stain, re-writing a portion of a chapter to turn into my workshop and writing, you know, this blog, but the deadline is the major looming thing in my life this week. The deadline rules. And this stresses me out. Now, in my "writing life", I have written several blogs, columns, and features about my procrastination issues. As my editors can surely attest, they are more than well-documented. They are, perhaps, over- documented. So this is not another recounting of the various techniques I actively and passively employ to facilitate not writing (examples I will not be giving: constantly getting up to refill my water, organizing my books by author then re-organizing them by genre, typing 200 words worth of swear words or catch phrases, etc.) . No sir. Totally not that. Instead, I am attempting to examine the psychology behind my dangerous and job-threatening need to procrastinate. Because if we can get under the hood and take a look-- to use a semi-incompatible cliche--maybe this baby will finally drive right. Onward self-examination! Reason 1: I need the pressure to focus.Analysis: Because I wait till the last moment to do things, I like to leave myself with little to no choice about whether or not I can work because--if I know I have time-- I will then rationalize doing something else, usually involving Netflix. Pressure leaves me no wiggle room, which forces me into a corner, which unleashes my creative side, which is something to behold a 4 AM. This excuse may have some legs. What My Dad Would Say: You are lazy and unbecoming of the Alexander lineage. What My Mom Would Say: I'm very proud of you, but I want you to get more sleep. Reason 2: I have an acute fear of failure and/or not knowing what I'm doing.Analysis: Every time I sit down to begin another article/blog/ chapter, I am stricken with the thoughts that I can't do it, I can't possibly pull off something again, that I will never write (blank) like the last (blank) that I wrote, and that I shouldn't even bother, and I should just get an internship at an Art Gallery. What My Dad Would Say: You're not a closer. And an internship at an Art Gallery sounds unpaid. What My Mom Would Say: You're the best writer ever, but I want you to get more sleep. Reason 3: If someone else is doing something, I need to also be doing that thing.Analysis: Like most people who spend their days locked up with their thoughts, I get lonely, even (or especially) when surrounded by hippies., which makes me susceptible to--like the title of R&B group 'Nuttin Nice's song says-- being "down for whateva". Also, people with 9-5 jobs don't "think I do anything all day", and always call me when they a) have a day off, b) want to go out during the week, c) want to do something stupid like go to Europe for 4 months, and can't find any takers. Of course, when I say "people with 9-5 jobs", i mean my friend Casey. What My Dad Would Say: If your friends jumped off the Tobin Bridge and into a low paying, non-health benefits filled "sea" of self- doubt, would you? Oh God, don't answer that. What My Mom Would Say: You're very unique, but I want you to get more sleep. Reason 4: I'm just lazy.Analysis: Maybe I'm just lazy. What My Dad Would Say: Yep. You nailed it. What My Mom Would Say: I agree with your father. Anyway, I don't have time for this. I have to go stress about my deadline while watching a documentary about the rise of R&B on VH1 Soul. I'm up to the part where they talk to Boyz II Men about Jodeci. Feel free to leave your own reasons as to why you think you procrastinate in a little something the Internet 2.0 likes to call the Comment(z) section and I'll try and update you on how things turn out. Let's get this money. Thank, You (live)Boyz II Men
11/27/2007 9:32:20 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 20, 2007
The Two Question Novel Quiz Part 3: Voice
In order to sell your novel, books recommend having a unique "voice" that separates you from the pack and wins you literary, commercial, and social-emotional praise. The fact that books also recommend that you be married to the chairman of Random House and/or Judith Regan is neither here nor there. But what kind of voice do you want to have? Do you want your voice to be strong and masculine like Hemingway and that dude who told Oprah he woke up on an airplane with no teeth or clever and flirty like Lauren Weisberger or whomever writes Candace Bushnell's books? If you said neither, books would point out that you're lying. Either way, to discover where your voice fits in on the voice spectrum, please take this short, two question quiz and then feel free to spend the rest of the week in a semi-concussed state of food coma remembering the vaguely worded story of Squanto and the Pilgrims before venturing to the mall at 5 AM on Black Friday to buy vanilla cookie candles at 40% off. It's totally worth it. Directions: Read then choose, then read then choose, then learn. 1. Your protagonist finds themselves seated across from their true love at the Olive Garden. Please describe said scene.A. The breadsticks were warm and garlic-scented and I was hungry. First, I was thirsty though and I ordered a whiskey and thought about bull fighting and other sports. I like sports. A girl was there, I think. B. Unless he's being ironic or something, the fact that Jeremy even considered taking me to an OG (in the burbs!!) is kind of ridic. Olive Garden's are full of ew people, and ew people cannot appreciate the fact that I squeezed into this Bottega Veneta Camel Shearling Shrug and these Jimmy Choo Biker Leather Flat Boots With Rabbit Fur Lining. I need like eleven Cosmo's. C. Music. The gentle hum of the synthesized version of "Hey Ya"reverberated off of the plush, faux-Italian decor. A cold rush came over me, a suspicious rush of season's past, a remembrance of things before, before a flood of emotions crept up on me like our vaguely mustachioed waiter. As Daphne ordered her Endless Pasta Bowl, I reflected on a time when the song of my love still played, still reflected towards me like a pool of reflective water. That my heart still beats is a wonder at all. I ordered the Tour of Italy and became dour. D. Don is famous for a lot of things, and most of those things have something to do with being a naughty, naughty boy. "Have you been a bad boy," I asked in a whisper, leaning over the table as the waiter brought the breadsticks. "You know I have," Don said, his crystal clear blue eyes running up and down my body. I picked up a breadstick, seductively. Three minutes later, we were doing it in the men's lavatory. 2. Your character finds themselves at an ATM machine needing money. How do they handle it?
A. We went to the woman at the bank and requested money. She said to use the machine. I told her I don't use machines. Walking home, I tried to think of what she meant. B. Jeremy made some joke about going "dutch" to dinner tonight, so I went to the ATM, the one down on Houston and Mott in Nolita by that cute brunch place Nolita House with the morning margarita's. Going "dutch" wasn't my problem. My problem was that as I was walking up to the ATM, I got my Purple Label Grey Metallic "Lizard" Crissy Evening Sandals stuck in a grate and I slipped, nearly ruining my Adriano Goldschmied Boyfriend Shorts and that cute top I borrowed from Kristin (whose new thing, apparently, is not eating). I should have moved to the Village. C. Doors. Opening and closing, exposing and then covering up. The automatic doors at the ATM remind me of the clapping hands of a babysitter I once had, a small Latina woman with strong, callused hands. Isn't life often like the closing and opening of doors, be they automatic, manual or otherwise? Friends become enemies, enemies, friends and the seasons pass with nay a look in the direction of God. I've forgotten my ATM card. D. "Where are we going to do it?" I asked Don, the bad boy actor. I felt bad. So bad that I kind of felt good. "I don't care baby, as long as it's hot and in public," Don said. He was smoking a cigarillo. "Well," I said, slyly plucking the cigarillo from his mouth and taking a long pull. "The ATM machine has a camera." "You're bad," Don said with a mischievous smile. "I know," I said. "I am bad." Key:
Mostly A's: Your sparse prose gives the bare minimum of details and doesn't really let us "inside". You pull it off, you're Hemingway. You don't, and you're (insert any male high school writer after just reading Death in the Afternoon by Hemingway). I'm pulling for you.
Mostly B's: Your voice is a little bit sexy and a little bit city. As long as your protagonist is 23-25 and working in a cool, creative, city job (fashion, magazines, advertising, corporate accounting, etc) with some boy trouble, you're pretty much already published.
Mostly C's: Oh, pseudo-literary. The eternal quest to flood the page with hyper-symbolic prose and internal reflection. When it's good, it's amazing, when it's bad, it's the worst. A little bit like sushi.
Mostly D's: You are Jackie Collins. And you are naughty.
Ok. Let me know where you stand in the comments. And--if you feel like your voice wasn't given a shout out-- feel free to drop where exactly you place yourself, preferably in that Hollywood movie-pitch style, "Tom Clancy meets E. Annie Proulx at Ken Follett's house". Don't use that one though, that's mine. I Wanna Be, RichCalloway
11/20/2007 2:01:37 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Pseudo-In-Depth Analysis of The Things I Read Online: Slate.com
As in gymnastics or morning visits to the bathroom, everyone has their own routines for visiting the Internet 2.0. Before I can safely get to "work", I scroll through a lengthy list of favorite blogs, news sites, social networking...networks, trendy sneaker information providers, and forums analyzing "The View" in an effort to get a more full and informed view of the world. And perhaps because of that finely tuned, cosmopolitan-esque view of said world, a lot of people should ask me, "What, Kevin, are those sites that provide you with such piercing insights and almost encyclopedic knowledge of other people's relationship statuses via The Facebook?" So--in an effort to answer that self-asked hypothetical question-- I am dropping a new, potentially recurring entry into my nest of recurring blog entries called, well, you can read the title. The point is to take a look at some of the sites that I read, give you some background on them, and then review them. Best case scenario, friends, is that you discover a new site of potential interest, worst case scenario, is that--somewhere down the line-- I attempt to submit something to one of these sites and, after a quick Google search, all of this comes back to bite me in the ass and I'm summarily blacklisted from participating in the Internet. Hmmm. Maybe this isn't a good idea. Slate.comSlate.com is an online news and culture magazine. According to its Advertising page (brief teaching moment: a good way to get a quick idea of how a magazine imagines their audience is to go to their "advertise with us" page and look at how they define themselves to advertisers and who they describe as their audience. It sounds kind of obvious, but it seemed entirely clever to me at the time I sorted it out), they attract 5 million unique visitors a month, although I don't know anyone outside of the journalism or writing worlds that doesn't just assume that Salon and Slate are--in the words of my roommate-- the same "online magazine thing". Journalists, on the other hand,--or, at least the ones that I associate with--assume that everyone is reading this particular online magazine thing. In fact, 86% of all conversations I have at Boston Mag start with, "Did you read __'s takedown of __ in Slate?" and then trail off into some sort lengthy debate as to whether you agree or disagree, usually followed by some sort of speculative, unconfirmed anecdote about the personal/professional life of the person who wrote it and then a call down to Ad Sales to see if there are any open-bar launch parties that night. That, friends, in a nutshell, is how good journalism is made. Anyway, Slate caters, if not specifically to journalists, then at least to people who spend a good deal of their time reading other magazines and newspapers, and they do it by acting like a meta-magazine; offering analysis, commentaries, and refutations of things written in other papers or magazines or blogs. Other online entities also do this (in fact, it's sort of an online specialty) but--since most of the people who write for Slate are seasoned journalists--you don't get that snarky "outsider attacking insider" feel that you get at a site like Gawker.com, and you can feel intelligent plagiarizing their opinions in an effort to sound more informed while making small talk on the subway. My one issue with Slate, which is most people's issue, is they seem to have a standard template for all of their pieces: think of some sort of contrary POV about a major issue/commonly prescribed notion, counter said argument using cleverly worded rhetorics, add many, many hyperlinks. When they pull it off, (which, admittedly, is most of the time) it comes off sounding fresh, new, and almost genius, but when they don't, it just sort of sounds like they all sat around brainstorming what would happen if every day was some sort of highbrow, literary version of Opposite Day. Either way, Slate does what any good culture/news mag should do; it infuriates, informs, and entertains, all while sparking debate. Plus, their movie critic Dana Stevens and I share similar tastes in films, which makes me feel smart. Anyway, as soon as I can sort it out, I'll give you a tasting plate of some classic, must-read Slate pieces. But, friends, since this is more of a conversation than anything else, I'm curious to get your own insights and opinions on sites that you read everyday, especially ones that are well-written, informative, and hilarious. So check up on those in the Comments. And yes, self promotion equals automatic disqualification. Come on now, you're better than that. Get out of my dreams, and into my car.Billy, Ocean
11/13/2007 10:17:25 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 06, 2007
Reviews of Books I Was Forced To Read in High School, Part 2: The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Brief Research Sidenote: In my long esteemed career of researching via the Web 2.0, I have come to love and look forward to the random factual tidbits provided for you by Wikipedia. For instance, where else would I have been able to discover that on an episode of "One Tree Hill", Lucas Scott reads a quote from The Scarlet Letter, or that the hip-hop group The Clipse features the lyric "Like a Scarlet Letter, for the world to see" on their mixtape "We Got It 4 Cheap: Vol. 1"? If you said nowhere, you're totally right. Eat it, World Book.
I read The Scarlet Letter during my freshman year of high school, which-- much like the book-- was a time of semi-specific love angst and poor clothing choices. The SL is by Nathaniel Hawthorne, a Bowdoin College Polar Bear, lifelong New Englander, and Concord, MA neighbor of two philosophizing writers with three names (Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson) whom I often confuse with each other. For those of you who don't know, The SL centers around a girl named Hester Prynne living on a 17th century Puritan settlement outside of Boston, who is forced to wear a big red A on her chest because she is an adulterer. The adultery in question is complicated, as her husband sent her ahead from England and allegedly never showed up, and God knows life in one of those Puritan settlements was kind of boring what with the hoeing and the witch hunting and what not, but, needless to say, once she got pregnant, the rumor mill (which was located next to the textile mill) abuzzed, and she got harangued. By the "town fathers". Seriously. This kind of stuff happened. As it turns out, other things also happened. Her long-lost husband was actually in town practicing medicine and using the creepy name Chillingworth. An eloquent minister is revealed to be the baby's daddy, which stresses him out. There is a meteor that looks like a red A. An escape to Europe is planned, then doesn't pan out. Revenge is sought by Chillingworth, then abandoned in frustration. Just think 17th century version of the movie "Something to Talk About" starring Julia Roberts and Dennis Quaid and I think you'll get it. Anyway, at the time of reading, I did not like The SL. As I recall, my analysis of the book was extensive. Using topical high school sophistry, I attempted a two-pronged attack, using the "Why were the Puritans so crazy?" argument and a less effective "personal experience with sin" component that pushed my grade into the low B's. I have since re-visited The SL (full disclosure: was forced to, in college) and can now better appreciate the themes in the book; sin, civilization vs the wild, old vs new, guilt, etc, but--what I've found looking back at these books-- is that, aside from The Great Gatsby, A Catcher in the Rye, and the underrated A Yellow Raft in Blue Water, I didn't "get" any of them while still in school and therefore, didn't like them. No doubt part of this can be blamed on the fact that I was probably "reading" these literary masterpieces while playing Goldeneye on Nintendo 64 and talking on my private phone line to my GF about whose house we were going to watch "Dawson's Creek" at, but still--for a man of words-- this is kind of embarrassing. But said embarrassment leads me to a question (or more of a statement about a question): I want to know which books you've read that--despite them receiving either critical, popular or social-emotional acclaim--you just really didn't like. Or "get". Especially if you lied about liking or "getting" them because you were ashamed to admit it and you didn't want that chick who sits across from you with the black rectangular framed glasses, the leather-bound notebook, and the smug, world-weary expression to have the satisfaction of knowing you didn't get them...or, you know, something like that. I await your embarrassment(z). I've got one hand in my pocket, and the other one is giving a high five
Alanis, Morissette
11/6/2007 7:40:36 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 30, 2007
(Potentially) Sellin' Out
It is true that there are a lot of benefits to the writing life. There are the hours, of course, that come with a flexible schedule, not to mention the clothing choices. For example, right now it is 10:30 AM, and I am wearing sweatpants and a long sleeve t-shirt, and I feel slightly overdressed. There is the allure of feeling like you're totally in charge of the work that you are creating (although that might just be a fiction, what with editors, and publishing houses, and agents trafficking in and molding your word play) and the rather selfish thought that you might have something tangible existing in this world long after you've exited. And, of course, there is the faint glimmer of hope that you might be "The Writer", the next someone, and famous and rich and able to afford a sick summer cottage on Lake George with a tire swing and one of those expensive looking gas grills. But, friends, as you all know, you can't have pro's without...um...non-pro's. And there are several non- pro's in the writing life. For one, money. I don't so much make any, as I do not make any, and I'm actually kind of successful. For two, loneliness. I spend much of my day staring, either at my computer, or out the window, or at the hippies who are sitting next to me at the coffee shop hand rolling clove cigarettes. Spending day after day in the company of your own thoughts is (probably) the quickest way to insanity, especially for someone whose third grade teacher described as "irritatingly social". With that said, every once in awhile, I start to dream about selling out. It happens a lot when I'm watching "The Office", and I think about how much I want to complain about my job, and be forced to make lunch choices from a vending machine or sue someone for wrongful termination. Anyway, if I ever do decide to stop "stickin' it to the Man" and start joining the Man's Wednesday night cribbage league, here are three jobs that I think a writer--like myself-- could successfully sell out for. 1. Company spokesperson. Companies have spokespeople, people who usually read and write press releases and try and put a good spin on terrible, terrible events, or disastrous stock plunges, or the rumor that Rosie and Lizzie Hasselbeck aren't "great friends". Modestly speaking, I think I would be great at this. I always liked debate, even if it meant taking a side of an issue I was opposed to, and I'm sure I could find a way to fire myself up about looking on the bright side of a tire recall or the seventh straight quarter of plummeting Skip-It sales. In fact, I'm ready to do this job right now. Someone hire me. I'll be your communications Rumpelstiltskin, spinning straw into gold, and--depending on my compensation package-- you won't even have to give me your first-born child. Think on it. 2. Corporate Communications Consultant. I kind of made this position up, but I'm almost positive it exists. I'd be like the guy who comes in when the company sets aside a day for special events, and--instead of soliciting trust falls-- makes some neat PowerPoint presentation about the endless possibilities of communicating effectively in the workplace. I would use a lot of buzzwords, like "synergy" and "proactive" and "boo yah" and snap and point a lot, when someone else said something I liked. I'd also be frustratingly cheerful, especially because I was getting 10 g's a class, and end the day with some sort of New Age breathing exercise. Wow, it's kind of scary how well thought out that was. 3. Totally Famous Actor. You know when someone says "you should be an actor" and you dismiss it by bashfully saying you could never do that, but in reality you think you would be really good at it, if only--while you were in high school-- your mother didn't crush your dreams of being on television by saying that your earlobes were "a little big for the camera", which forced you to spend a lot of time staring in the mirror at your earlobes, which caused you to stop wearing baseball caps, which forced you to shave your head, which effectively prevents you from using that cool hair stuff that celebrities these days use, which is probably the only reason you aren't in Vancouver right now, remaking "House Party 2" with Nick Canon? Yeah, me neither. Feel free to drop your own sell out jobs in the comments. And I know it's very annoying to be a Boston sports fan right now with their Dutch-Navy-in-the-1600s-like dominance, but if you'll allow me one indulgence: Happy Soxtober, baby. Ain't Nobody Humpin' Around,
Bobby, Brown
10/30/2007 9:07:39 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 23, 2007
The (Really Long) Two Question Novel Quiz Part 2: Know Thy Characters
Characters are, without question, the blood of life flowing through the veins of a novel. Without characters a novel would just be setting, and there would be more adverbs and long, flowery dense paragraphs describing said setting, which would no doubt increase the need for anti-depressants. But you can't just throw characters on the page, make them tongue kiss and call it a novel. No, sir. You need to know these characters like you know yourself or your friends or Elizabeth Hasselbeck.
Don't believe me? Fine. But maybe you'll believe my old friend Lajos Egri, who, in The Art of Dramatic Writing, states that, in order to truly make "tri-dimensional characters", you need to know their three 'ology's: Physiology, Sociology, and Psychology. And trust me, you do not want to mess with Lajos Egri, especially after he's been drinking whiskey. Now seeing how this is a two question quiz and not three, we have omitted psychology, but that matters not. I think you'll get the drift. So stop doing pushups in front of the mirror, mute "Will and Grace", and check up on this special, awkwardly long edition of The Two Question Novel Quiz. Directions: Pick the answer that most clearly coincides with what you know of your main character. 1. Describe everything you know about the physiology of your character.A. Casey is a girlish boy between 18-40 with terrible posture.
B. Casey is a really tall girlish boy in his mid-twenties with terrible posture and hips that don't lie.
C. Casey is a 6'8 girlish 26 year old boy with raven black hair, green eyes, freckles and the posture of a man who has spent most of his life in one of those stockades you see in The Pirates of the Caribbean. He's decent looking despite having thick ankles and uneven arms. And yet, his hips still don't lie.
D. At 6'8, Casey is registered as a giant in several Eastern European countries. A long, wiry 26 year old with raven black hair, greenish yellow eyes, and those light freckles that only show up in the sun, he has to deal with the fact that his right arm is 2 inches longer than the left and his ankles are so thick that they may be impossible to sprain. His feet are uncomfortably wide, which means he has to purchase New Balance running shoes because they come in widths. He has a fairly symmetrical face, although that contends with a gigantic head that he covers with a ten-gallon Stetson he calls "Izzy". Perhaps that explains his terrible posture and the birthmark of a lightning bolt fighting a wizard on his back. And after spending several summers in latin dance classes, his hips finally don't lie.2. What is the sociological situation your character faces?A. Drew is a kind of rich white boy who went to one of those schools where you don't come home after school and you have to wear sweaters. His parents are, like, aggressively not sweet.
B. Drew is a 22 year old upper-middle class white kid with a secure job selling Cutco knives door to door post college. He went to boarding school after his parents divorced and his father moved back to Ireland. His mom does drugs and cries while watching Grey's Anatomy repeats.
C. Drew is a 22 year old upper-middle class white kid from Weston, CT. He has a job right now selling Cutco knives, which is lucrative because he knows a lot of rich women with dull knives. Drew attended Choate after his parents split and then Connecticut College, where he double majored. His mother divorced his father, an Irish doctor, after finding out he had a second life in Seattle, WA, where he was dating an intern at a hospital. His mother smokes drugs and cries while watching Grey's Anatomy repeats. When this happens, Drew goes up in his room and plays video games.
D. Drew is a 22 year old upper-middle class white WASP from Weston, CT. He dislikes his current job selling Cutco knives but doesn't quit because he's made 7 grand in the past two months selling said knife sets to bored, rich friends of his mother, who always act impressed when he cuts a penny with a knife. After his parents divorced when he was 16, Drew attended Choate where he got mostly B's, and Conn College, where he majored in English and Dance and continued to get B's while dating girls one year younger than him. His mother is depressed, and has been ever since she found out that his father, a surgeon, large Republican party donor and Irish citizen, was leading a second life in Seattle, WA, where he lived in a trailer on a large tract of land and dated an intern at Seattle Grace named Meredith. During the days his mother sits around the house in fleece sweatpants, smoking marijuana out of a bowl she confiscated from him, eating Funions, and crying while watching several emotional episodes from the Second Season of Grey's Anatomy. When this happens, Drew goes up in his room and plays as the Dallas Stars in NHL 94 on his Sega Genesis, usually with the penalty for offsides turned off.Key: Mostly A's: Perhaps you haven't quite thought through just how long you're going to be with this character, mostly because you don't really seem to know anything about them. Maybe you two need to re- evaluate your relationship before moving forward in a serious manner. Really, it's not them, it's you. Mostly B's: You're getting there. You kind of know things about your character, and you've kind of started to flesh them out, and that's kind of good, but you better start stepping your game up if you want to make this character more than kind of believable. Nice job, kind of. Mostly C's: This is good. You've really thought about your character and started to develop specific, detailed backstory, which will guide you through the book. You might even have enough there to be able to pump out a first draft in less than three years. Please stop rubbing that fact in my face. Mostly D's: You have an obsessive, scarily encyclopedic knowledge of your made-up character that borders on unhealthy. You probably get into real life situations and find yourself thinking, "what would my character do here", which is troubling, especially if you're on a date. And worst of all (for us and the hope for normal social interactions), if you want to create successful Egri style "tri- dimensional" characters, this is probably where you need to be at. Congratulations? I Want To Know What Love Is, I Want You To Show MeForeigner
10/23/2007 1:30:09 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, October 18, 2007
True Tales of Embarrassment Via The Internet 2.0
TOW books--in celebration of the release of their first two books--has a series of embarrassing admissions by writers on their website. My terribly true, terribly embarrassing admission is up now. You can find it here.
And, just in case you thought I was the only one embarrassing myself from WD, Brian Klems also steps in with--in my opinion--the most fantastic admission of all time, which he can never run from now that the Internet 2.0 has it. Read it here.Sorry, Mom. Part 2 of the Two Question Novel Quiz is dropping tomorrow (or, you know, next Monday). You best make like Beyonce and check up on that. That's so, poision
10/18/2007 10:26:25 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 15, 2007
The (Re) Write Blog: Issues, Perils, and Semi-Solutions
As those of you who read the print column and a few, scattered previous entries on said blog may or may not be aware, I'm working on a novel to use as my thesis for my MFA and then use as "walking around money" while applying for a post-graduation job as a bartender in the Blue Sapphire Lounge aboard the Carnival Cruise line Ecstasy. As it stands in real time, one draft of said novel has been completed and I am now working on the re-writes. Generally speaking, re-writes are easier than whipping up new, fresh drafts because you already see the themes in place and (hopefully) know where you're going to be pushing your characters. Unfortunately, "generally speaking" about my novel doesn't really work while writing it, and I have hit several rocky patches along the way, if by "rocky" I mean "impossibly frustrating, tear-inducing periods of intense melancholy". With that said, I am going to present three major problems I've faced during the re-writing process and the solutions (or non-solutions) to said problems. The thinking is that by seeing the issues I have, you can take steps to avoid some of your own...or at least write a very similar book to mine that will probably sell sooner. Re-write Issue One: Introducing a new character that wasn't previously in the first draft. Specifics: The first draft of my novel had a lot of dudes. And a few girls. Ok, like two girls. But there was a certain need for a girl (friend) that wasn't directly invested in the main plot line and would also provide the narrator with a fresh perspective. And would make fun of him. And be good at basketball. Like, really good. Peril: New character means new early chapters, which means whatever interactions they have will influence the thoughts of the narrator throughout the book, which means you have to change more things, or at least make sure they stay consistent, which means more work, which sounds daunting especially when written down. Solution: Create character with a personality based loosely on friend of friend and the athletic prowess of an average WNBA two guard, and have them meet on the basketball court. Write up brief background bio and keep relationship specific to this one place, ridding yourself of having to incorporate them into other scenes. Feel smart about it when you begin talking about the basketball court being a "metaphor for the bubble surrounding their relationship". Use the term "budding relationship dynamics" in your novel workshop class. Clear throat when nobody responds. Re-write Issue Two: Realizing that you wrote some really, really, REALLY bad chapters. Kind of in the early middle.Specifics: Chapters 4 and 5 are, in a word, unreadable. In two words, they're breathtakingly horrifying. Peril: Completely deleting sh*tty chapters that bridge the story line together is--like jai alai-- a dangerous but necessary game to play. Not to mention, then you have to write two COMPLETELY new chapters in their place and we've talked previously about my work ethic. Solution: Re-read chapter in Anne Lamott's Bird by Bird regarding re-writes. Pout for several days refusing to even look at book. Get embarrassed that you could create such unthinkably poor prose. Play Big Buck Hunter 3 with friends at local dive bar, vent about problem. Note that friends only become vaguely sympathetic/concerned when you're holding pitcher of beer. Go to Espresso Royale, avoid eye contact with hippies, create outline of things you need to salvage from said chapters to push book forward. Take those things. Delete the rest. Feel sensation similar to when putting out recycling. Re-write Issue Three: Coming up with a working title for your book.Specifics: Um, I don't have a working title for my book. I thought I said that. Peril: Without even a working title, book feels like a really, really long uncited lit paper. Plus, it just sounds better when--at parties-- you can say, "Moving the conversation back to me, I'm currently in the throes of passionately re-writing my novel Waterworld 2: False Pretenses On the High Seas. It's a hilarious love-dramedy with religious underpinnings. Anyways, I'm off to the after party with Eugenides, Franzen, and (R.)Kelly. Thank your wife again for the clam cakes." Solution: Go to canonical list of weird band names on the Internet 2.0. Read the band name "A Cat Born in an Oven Isn't a Cake" and decide this is not going to help. Make list of all your favorite words while intense discussion about McEwan's Atonement takes place around you during workshop. Decide "The Great Tongue Kiss Debacle" isn't quite right. Brood. And that's all she wrote. Feel free to offer your own solutions/problems/perils in the Comments. And stay tuned for part 2 of the Two Question Novel Quiz later on this week. We Belong to the Light, We Belong to the Thunder,
Pat, Benatar 
10/15/2007 4:00:26 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, October 12, 2007
 Tuesday, October 09, 2007
C. Columbus Day: Now with Life Altering Literature!
Shameless Cross-Promotional Plug: My friend Sarah Walker's book, Really You’ve Done Enough: A Parents’ Guide to Stop Parenting Their Adult Child Who Still Needs Their Money But Not Their Advice has been released from Tow books. It's very funny. If you're interested, Google it, then hit one-click purchase on Amazon to buy it and the Fantastic Four - Rise of the Silver Surfer (The Power Cosmic Edition, 2-Disc Set) DVD. Or off of the Tow books website at www.towbooks.com. Get some. Today is Columbus Day (or, as they've called it in Venezuela since 2002, the "Day of Indigenous Resistance"). So in honor of the holiday celebrating the discovery of The Bahamas by a guy that was kind of a self-promotional (fill in your own four-letter word here), I too am going to offer my own form of discovery under the guise of 25-42 word anecdotes re: 5 books that forever altered my mental landscape and the reasoning behind said alterations. 1. The Great Brain Series by John Dennis Fitzgerald: Tom Sawyer-esque stories revolving around the escapades of the narrator's mischievous older brother "T.D." in late 19th century Utah, these books taught me valuable lessons about small town culture, religious tolerance, and water closets. They were scary, climatic, and prescient: In The Great Brain is Back, for example, T.D. breaks up a Michael Vick style dogfighting ring. 2. The Kid Who Only Hit Homers by Matt Christopher: Matt Christopher writes about heavy topics (divorce, death, immigration) under the veil of books about kids playing sports. As a kid, I thought I loved them because I, too, loved sports, but I found out much later--upon revisiting a Matt Christopher book in my mother's basement during a spell of acute boredom-- that helped me deal with stuff going on in my own life. Plus, who hasn't wanted Babe Ruth's ghost to inhabit their body while playing little league? 3. A Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger: Wait... you can write funny, haunting, stream of conscious prose with a semi-clueless cocky narrator and have it be considered American Literature? Seriously? The book that probably ruined any chance I had to go into a money making profession, I was stereotypically obsessed with Catcher, read it (on my own!!!) six or seven times in high school, and used one of its most obnoxious lines as my senior quote: "It's really hard to be roommates with someone when your suitcases are much better than theirs." Not. Cool. 4. A Prayer for the City by Buzz Bissinger: Before he wrote the book that became the Greatest Non-Cable Television Show of Our Era, Friday Night Lights, Bissinger wrote this classic chronicle of city life and politics through the eyes of (then mayor of Philly now governor of Penn) Ed Rendell. After reading this book for an Urban Politics class in college, I immediately turned around and read it again then applied for an internship at a free city paper, hoping to write the exact same type of stories about Hartford. Unfortunately, college life, access and talent intervened, but the book remains an indelible mark on my writing conscious. 5. On Writing Well by William Zinsser: Nothing has done more to influence and create my own voice and literary aspirations than this man and his simple, elegant, how-to guide to writing. Post reading this, writing became significantly less scary and increasingly simple and his term "to commit an act of literature" remains one of my favorite phrases of all time. Anyway, I'm off to commit several acts of literature amongst the hippies at Espresso Royale. Enjoy your Day of Indigenous Resistance. And be sure and drop your own stories of mind altering literature in the Comments. All Out of Love,
Air, Supply
10/9/2007 8:23:54 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 02, 2007
(Meta) Life Changingly Awesome Query Letter Part 5: Tiger Beat
( In order to allow you, the reader, to play along at home and fully utilize the time-tested, mother-approved formula that make LCAQ's so, so damn successful, I'm going to walk you through the steps I take when crafting these timeless phenomenon's of top shelf journalism.)(First: always find the name of the editor of the section you're pitching, unless you know for a fact that they don't like you because you accidentally got drunk at a writing conference and called them an "ugly faced sellout", at which point it's probably better to stick to the editor-in-chief) Dear Editor-in-Chief Whose Name I Couldn't Find Online, (The lede's got to hook them in right away and show off some of your writing skillz. Sidenote: Don't make a habit of replacing s's with z's) Oh, Tiger Beat, sweet, sweet Tiger Beat, ye olde beacon of puberty-past. How you must long to dramatize the alarming effects that teen idols have on 13 year old girl psyches. How perfect your pictures were for the collages girls used to give to their BFFs with ransom-esque words like "Boy Krazy" and "Hottie" juxtaposed over pictures of Justin Timberlake and that guy who played AC Slater. Do you not pine for the pre-Facebook days when kids still read things that weren't posted on their friends "walls"? Don't you wish you knew what a "wall" was? (Ok. Although this is sort of an advanced concept, I recommend that-- while displaying your intimate knowledge of the magazine you're pitching-- you feel free to speculate philosophically about the meaning of said magazine's name) Well, fear not. Your magazine is called Tiger Beat for a reason, although that reason isn't all that clear to me. It is neither about Tigers nor about musical beats and none of your reporters seem to have local ties to zoos, which--while puzzling-- is unimportant. I think too many people overlook the subtlety of a name like Tiger Beat. Perhaps you're giving a subtle homage to Colin Farrell's American movie debut in "Tigerland", which also had nothing to do with tigers but did have several hotties who'd look above average on collages. (Now that they know where you're coming from and what you know, drop the full idea on them in a short, interesting paragraph. Be very specific and try to identify where you will place it in the mag so that editors will feel like you actually read the magazine and didn't just hear someone talking about it while browsing Forever 21 in the mall.) Moving on, my idea is simple. I wish to spend an entire day participating in various athletic/intellectual/social-emotional contests of the body/ mind/soul with Kevin Alexander Clark--the former teen heart throb from School of Rock and a mutual bearer of the Kevin Alexander name/ stamp. Although the details are still "iffy", let's just say there will be a Slip N' Slide off, a You've Got Served style dance off, and some sort of left handed arm wrestling contest. I assume you have a legal department in case sh*t gets real. The piece will consist of several sections detailing these athletic feats coupled with the Juiciest ( random capitalization? So in right now!!) of details re: KAC's lady friends, haircuts, and turbulent trip through puberty. And just because I like you,if you give me 24 hours, I can probably deliver 3600 words and several pull quotes from Raven Symone Pearman, gratis. (Oooohhh. Here's a teaching point: Always use words that you understand. For example, I didn't realize that gratis meant free, and now I've potentially screwed myself out of my rent money for the month of October)(Now that you've unleashed your idea it's time to throw down your credentials so they know why you're the one who should be writing the article) But maybe Sweet Tiger Beat, you still remain on the proverbial fence. Maybe you still doubt that someone can penetrate the soul of a method actor like KAC. Well to help assuage said fears, here are a two FAQ's about my life as a professional writer to help get you all aboard the Kevin Alexander writing train express. 1. In your estimation, how many articles have you, Kevin Alexander, published? Answer: First of all, I never estimate. Never! I just know. And the answer is roughly 70. 2. Why should you write this article? I don't think you've ever read a Tiger Beat. Answer: You don't have to "open" a Tiger Beat to know that they're dropping the hottest celebrity journalism outside of Eastern Europe. And to answer your first question, I have to believe that God and at least one of my parents put me on this earth to do two things: 1. Get arrested for "disturbing the peace" at a Third Eye Blind Concert and 2. Win Tiger Beat a National Magazine Award and--as the magistrate at the Hartford Civil Court can attest-- I'm already halfway there. (Now that you've wrapped your query in such a tightly constructed, finely tuned package of words, it's time to bring it home. I recommend a pithy little comment about how busy you are so they realize you're the real thing and then some sort of pop culture reference sign off incorporating the title of the magazine. Editors LOVE this.)Alright TG, I've got to be off. It seems Facebook has alerted me that someone has both "poked" me and written on my wall and I need to update my Myspace page to include a blazin' Justin Timberlake remix I just encountered on the Internet 2.0. You know where to find me (Oh yeah. Include your contact info at the bottom). I feel like I've known you forever. (Tiger) Beat it, Kevin Alexander 
10/2/2007 11:01:05 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, September 28, 2007
The Two Question Novel Quiz Part 1: Conflict
Everybody knows that-- much like the plot lines in the Wesley Snipes vehicle Passenger 57-- a good novel needs to have conflict. My novel, for example, has so much conflict that my thesis advisor actually wants me to call it either Conflict(ed) or Hot Damn!!: A Novel. But today we're focusing on you. And if you're reading this, you're more than likely writing a novel, or at least a thinly veiled memoir. So DVR "The View", sit down and answer these two simple questions and let's find out if your novels got beef. 1. Which description most aptly describes your antagonist's relationship with your protagonist?
A. My protagonist Casey likes Romantic Comedies whereas my antagonist Drew only kind of likes Romantic Comedies. B. My protagonist is a 15 year old boy named Casey interested in seeing an R rated Romantic Comedy starring Michael Cera, but standing in his way is the ticket collector, a 17 year old boy named Drew who's a stickler for the rules. It's kind of a short book. C. My protagonist Casey wants nothing more than to write the greatest Romantic Comedy of all time but standing in her way is the antagonist, Drew, who has made it his life mission to preserve Failure to Launch as the greatest romantic comedy of all time, and will stop at nothing (Nothing!!) to keep it that way. Plus they're married. D. My protagonist Casey is at Blockbuster with his antagonist Drew. Casey wants to get a Failure To Launch because he heard it's the greatest Romantic Comedy of all time. Drew kills him with a longbow. 2. In How To Write a Damn Good Novel, James N. Frey discusses the importance of keeping your characters in a "crucible", which he describes as "the container that holds the character's together as things heat up...or the bond that keeps them in conflict with each other". Pick the letter that best corresponds to the crucible your characters are in.A. Drew dislikes Casey's views on politics and they both live in the same city so they could, like, totally run into each other at Trader Joe's and it would be awkward. The city is their crucible. B. Drew hates Casey but Casey is his driving ed instructor. If Drew doesn't pass Driver's Ed, he has to take it again, which is a total waste of a summer. The class is their crucible. C. Drew hates Casey but Casey is his sergeant in the army during the Mexican-American war of 1846. And they're forced to share a tent. And Casey is married to his sister, Taylor, who's a pretty good singer. The army, marriage, and shared space are their crucibles. D. Drew hates Casey because Casey started to walk across the street when the Don't Walk sign was blinking. F*ck a crucible, Drew kills Casey with a longbow. Key: Mostly A's: Um, no, this isn't going to work. I've seen more conflict on "Dora the Explorer". In fact, go watch it.
Mostly B's and C's: Now we're talking. Or maybe fighting. But in a good way. You've got all the right ingredients to have a potentially interesting and novel length conflict. And that Mexican-American war story seems like a surefire blockbuster. You're welcome.
Mostly D's: Unfortunately, you've got a case of what the pros like to call "jumping conflict". Things accelerate without building up and don't really add up. You're like the Jerry Springer contestant of novel writing. Put down that longbow.
Let me know how you fare in the Comments. Have a great weekend. Get Crunk, KA 
9/28/2007 1:55:08 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, September 24, 2007
In the Marketplace of (Really Good) Ideas
I had an informal meeting the other day with a few of the editors at Boston Magazine to discuss stories for the Fall/Winter. I say informal because we didn't schedule the meeting (I just sort of wandered over to one of the editor's cubes, and the other editor happened to walk by and decided to join the fray --the Fray?--) and I was (probably) wearing a ring spun cotton distressed t-shirt with some sort of clever saying on it. Point being, sh*t was casual. The start of the meeting went something like this: "Kev, you need to write some sweet stories." "Yeah, but I don't want to do something standard. I want to, like, infiltrate a sub-culture or something." "Fine, yeah. I'm with you. What did you have in mind?" "...Something edgy." "Ok. Be specific." "I dunno, but i bet some sh*t goes on in Cambridge." "What type of sh*t?" "Uh... edgy, counter-culture type sh*t." "Yeah. That's not a story idea." Eventually, joined by the other editor, things got more specific. The editors tried to convince me to do stories that required investigative journalism and phone calls and I tried to convince them that I should do (hilarious!!) essays with little to no reporting. (Note: story ideas have been changed to protect their awesomeness and ensure that someone else doesn't pitch them, sign the contracts and get the money that I need to pay for the It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia DVD I just purchased off Amazon) "What about you trying to take down this major Boston institution? I mean, that's the type of story that makes a writer's career." "Hmmmm. What about if I write a 'Where is He Now' profile of Rick Astley? But not even like a profile, more like an essay about where I think he is now..." "Rick Astley? The singer from the 80s? Is he even from Boston?" "I'm sure he's been to Boston." "No." This back and forth is a central part of the story-creation process. When I was younger I was so happy just to be getting paid to write that I would feign enthusiasm for pretty much anything, and come away with contracts for stories that I not only wasn't very amped up about, but also didn't really understand. Of course, unless you're named Mitch Albom or working part-time for a hedge fund, the reality of the situation is you probably need money, and sometimes you have to do things strictly to keep your electricity/DVR working. But--as I've said repeatedly-- one of my only strengths (aside from being devastatingly modest) is that I am now very aware of my limitations as a writer and no longer feel that familiar Catholic-tinged guilt of my youth when I turn down an idea that I know I wouldn't be best for anyway. Anyway, we did eventually come up with several story ideas to pursue that sated both parties and I left feeling productive and principled. Plus, being hypothetically flush with cash from my new contracts, I spent the rest of the day on iTunes, downloading the remaining eight Rick Astley tracks I had yet to purchase and poking people on Facebook. Win-f-ing-Win. Stay tuned later on this week for a sweet very short but completely essential writing quiz. Crank Dat, Soulja, Boy
9/24/2007 3:45:06 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, September 17, 2007
Reviews of Books I Was Forced To Read in High School, Part 1: Ethan Frome
By all accounts, Edith Wharton is not a sadist. Although she did marry
a man twelve years her senior who happened to go insane and
intentionally chose to spend most of her life in France, she was an
influential taste-maker, a friend of Teddy Roosevelt, and somewhat
embarrassed by boozehound F. Scott Fitzgerald's social awkwardness.
According to Wikipedia, she was damn prolific, and I'm even
willing to admit that I read (most of) The Age of Innocence and I
really liked it. But her novel Ethan Frome almost ruined me on American
Lit....4...eva:(. &nb | |