|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| October, 2008 (1) |
| September, 2008 (4) |
| August, 2008 (4) |
| July, 2008 (5) |
| June, 2008 (4) |
| May, 2008 (5) |
| April, 2008 (5) |
| March, 2008 (7) |
| February, 2008 (8) |
| January, 2008 (4) |
| December, 2007 (4) |
| November, 2007 (4) |
| October, 2007 (7) |
| September, 2007 (4) |
| August, 2007 (6) |
| July, 2007 (4) |
| June, 2007 (9) |
| May, 2007 (7) |
| April, 2007 (9) |
| March, 2007 (5) |
| February, 2007 (3) |
| January, 2007 (1) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Blogroll
Writing Resources
|
 Tuesday, January 22, 2008
The Great American (Cellphone) Novel: A Writer's Digest Exclusive!!
I, like many youngish people, use the text message feature on my cell phone in an excessive manner, which is indisputably annoying and potentially harmful, especially when trying to cut things or cross major intersections. But unlike a lot of other young people who are probably just text messaging their friends to tell them about the cute boyz they sat by at the new Hannah Montana film, I, friends, am making history. See, I am writing a hit novel. On my cell phone. Although the fad has yet to hit the US, cell phone novels are huge in Japan. Seriously. Some 21 year old lady friend named Rin tapped out a novel on her cell phone that sold 400,000 copies in hardcover. The New York Times proves this by saying so here: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/world/asia/20japan.html?_r=1&ref=books&oref=slogin And so, in honor of this newfound use of my text messaging ability, I just wrote a novel on my cellphone during the car ride back from my grandparents house in Springfield. It will come out in limited release (to all of my Contacts on my Contact List) later on this week but as a sneak preview, I am posting a never-before-seen portion on the Writer's Digest site. So, without further adieu, here is a two chapter excerpt from The Nite Out by Kevin Alexander: Ch 1. Sup, said John. N/M. U? said Geoff. Geoff told him he'd promised 2 get drinks L8R w/ a cute girl that he met at the mall. John says kewl but sarcastically. John h8s the mall, and tells Geoff. Geoff LOLs but doesn't mean it. 4eva ago the 2 were BFF. Now John and Geoff seemed 2 be not awesome. 10sion loomed. Ch 2. OMG, is this Boyz II Men? Carrie wondered. I f-ing heart B II M! Geoff nods and turns his iTrip up. I also have Jodeci, Geoff offers. RU kidding me, Carrie says aloud. Carrie thinks he might be 4 her. I didn't know U heart music, Carrie said, LOLing. U R a QT! We;ve G2G to a concert sometime. Totes, Geoff says. U know who else hearts music? John. Who's John. Carrie wants to know. No 1. says Geoff. At least not 4 now. There it is, friends. Can't you totally see the developing narrative arc? And don't get me started on the tensions arising between the protagonists/antagonist... I know, I'm surprised it's my first cell phone novel too. I'll let you know how the bidding goes when the deal for the manuscript inevitably goes to auction. JK. Loungin', (Remix)LL Cool J
1/22/2008 11:31:30 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 15, 2008
The Graduate School Timeline; Or Things You Can Do for Half a Decade Post-College
This week marks a special and unique moment in my life plan. It is the last week before I start my last semester of the last time I will ever step into a classroom as a student. This, friends, is somewhat relieving/terrifying. And so, armed with two inarguably similar masters and nearly 4 and a half years of post-college education under my ever expanding belt, I will finally be doing what my father asked me to do at the all night party following my high school graduation: getting a job.
Contrary to my father's belief, my twisted road through grad school hasn't been entirely Ritalin and Merlot-fueled debates about Arthouse films I hadn't seen, indie rock bands I tell people I saw several years ago but actually only recently downloaded, and ironic discussions of MTV reality shows. Sure, those things took up most of my time and energy, but there was also work. And education. And problems with my tuition checks. But before nostalgia completely creeps in and overwhelms me, and to honor the final time I get to ask someone where they are going for "Spring Break", I will present a timeline of the highs and lows of my post-college grad school career, complete with occasional points of exclamation! Late August 2003: Attend graduate school orientation at Boston University's School of Communication with friend/roommate Matt Herman, who is also attending the grad school for Advertising. Sit with several people during the "get to know you" lunch that I never, ever talk to nor see again. Oct 2003: Write story about male friendships for Literary Journalism class that Professor calls "Esquire-esque". Nov 2003: Realize that calling something "Esquire-esque" doesn't necessarily translate into "publishable in Esquire". Jan 2004: Get into class that works on "long narrative and investigative projects". Decide to write about being in middle school by spending 4 months at my own former middle school. Work is considered " kind of creepy" by my (ex)girlfriend. March 2004: Spring Break!!!! May 2004: Our class gets to present our work at a pitch meeting at Boston Magazine. So nervous I sweat through two shirts. Talk mostly about middle school slang. Swear three times and make several uncomfortable jokes in an attempt to fill dead air. Am convinced I will be kicked out of grad school. Post pitch meeting, get drunk. May 2004: Surprisingly, find out Boston Magazine wants to buy my piece. "Not so creepy anymore am I", I exclaim repeatedly to ex-girlfriend while she is at work. "Are you drunk at 1 pm on a Tuesday?" she asks. Silence ensues. Sep 2004: First published work comes out in Boston Magazine! Bring it into class! Other kids think I'm showing off/rubbing it in their faces! In hindsight, huge mistake! Oct 2004: First negative letter written about said work is forwarded to me by editorial assistant!!! Dec 2004: Graduate from BU! Get diploma sent to me, rather than attend graduation ceremony. Family thanks me. Tell them I want to get an MFA in creative writing in lieu of working. Family no longer appreciative. February 2005: Find acceptance letter from Emerson in stack of papers my mom was throwing out. "Oh, whoops," she says. March 2005: Spring Break!!! And rejection letter from Columbia. Call father. "Well, Ivy League schools are hard to get into." "No, dad. This is Columbia College. In Chicago." "You're making that up." September 2005: Orientation at Emerson! Take terrible ID picture. Sit with several people during the "get to know you" lunch that I will never, ever talk to again. And a kid from Ohio with a beard that I grudgingly become friends with. Oct 2005: Realize Lit classes are harder than Journalism classes. Dec 2005: Get grades. Ask friend if a "B" is good in a grad school class. Receive a "Are you f-ing seriously asking me that?" followed by extended laughter. Reply "no" meekly. Jan 2006: Take lighter workload, hoping it improves work ethic. March 2006: Spring Break!!! April 2006: Deem goal unreasonable and poorly thought out. Sept 2006: Take Memoir writing class. Use material from first book. Don't re-write. Sit back and wait for compliments. Oct 2006: Chapters excoriated. Turns out, wasn't all that good. Confidence, security and bladder control questioned. Jan 2007: Take leave of absence for quarter life crisis style trip around Eastern Europe with the Big Cat. Eat a ton of kebabs. March 2007: Spring Break!!! April 2007: Come back refreshed, re-motivated and semi-addicted to whiskey. Also have beard. Writing has a new, sleek European feel. June 2007: Lose European feel. And beard. Sept 2007: Toy with graduating in the Winter, but decide against it for "sake of my book". Dec 2007: Get the "I feel like you're never going to graduate and get a job, which is embarrassing considering you're no longer on the sunny side of 25" speech from my father, hidden in a Christmas card! Whew. Are blog entries even allowed to be this long? Don't you feel like you just lived through the last half decade of my life? Anyway, I'm off to figure out how to dismantle Chapters 4-7 of my book and rewrite them so that they're logical, well-written and don't have several elaborate side plots about characters that no longer exist. You, friends, should try and stay out of the cold. Or if you live somewhere warm, where blizzards are merely names for elaborate ice cream treats from Dairy Queen... invite me over. I travel light, do dishes and only snore when I'm on my back. Think on it. In, former Snow
1/15/2008 7:45:37 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, January 08, 2008
On Taking (Non-Productive) Breaks
Hello friends, I hope you--like me-- found time over the holiday to reflect on the year that was and consume nearly twice your daily recommended caloric intake in Lindt chocolate truffles and kind-of-gross, kind-of-really-good alcoholic Egg Nog. But now that I've New Years Resolutioned Up and thrown away anything and everything even vaguely brown in my apartment in favor of leafy greens and Guava Goddess Kombucha tea, and I'm finally ready to be back in my normal writing routine, I realized something: I'm kind of rusty. Due to the holiday and some unforeseen family stuff, I didn't get a chance to write for two weeks. And so today, when I sat back down in the familiar confines of Espresso Royale, after attempting to nod tentatively at the regulars (you know: the hippies, the college age dude in a bowler cap who is always reading one of the free alternative weeklies and tracing something on a pad, and the loud, unpredictable counter-culture girl with multiple piercings, an eerily normal looking boyfriend, and either a drug problem or an unusually small bladder), I tried to pick up where I left off on my novel re-writes and discovered, to my horror, that I couldn't, well, do anything. Ideas were vague, plot connections muddled. I couldn't remember the name of one of my central characters. I spent a terrifyingly long 45 minutes re-reading back chapters just to get a sense of what I was writing about only to find that when I finally remembered, I didn't have anything creative in the tank. So I went and ordered a Turkey Avocado Club on a sesame bagel. And while I was sitting down to slay said lunch treat (I know, I know, bagels are terribly caloric), I started to think about why I was rusty. Unlike writer's block, (which-- I should point out-- is usually just my excuse to watch "The View"), it wasn't that I couldn't get anything on the page, it was more that I was forgetting what I needed to put on said page. Which reminded me that writing a novel is just like speaking a language. If you stop working, you lose your fluency, your momentum, and your ability to remember the names of secondary characters that play vital roles nearly all the way through the book. Of course, sometimes breaks are good, and necessary even, to clear your head or give a draft another look with a fresh set of eyes. But not while you're in the thick of things, and not when you have to turn in a certain draft of said piece of work to a certain thesis adviser in a certain amount of days, and you only have another 44 minutes of battery on your laptop, and the hippies are hogging the tables by the power outlet. So, in conclusion, my break, while important were I to ever need this excess weight during hibernation, was not what experts might call "smart" or even "logical under the circumstances". Let me know if you suffered the same fate of holiday-induced indolence or feel free to heap on the guilt by telling me about the thousands and thousands of words you produced while your relatives were talking. Either way, drop it in the comments. We Got, The Beat The Go-Go's
1/8/2008 8:36:08 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Friday, December 21, 2007
The Holiday Hiatus
Friends, In order to best mentally, physically and socially emotionally prepare for a second year of sometimes helpful, semi-effective, consistently above-average blog entries, we three bloggers of WD are taking a holiday respite. Upon our return on January 7th, we will be giving away free cars like they did on Oprah!!! ready with an entire years worth of new quizzes, complaints, and 80s music sign offs guaranteed to make up for the fact that your significant other didn't get you that cute stay-at-home Butler you asked for. So from all of us here at the WD, we wish you a fantastic holiday and a safe, happy, and semi-coherent New Year. And speaking of gifts, if you're bored, let me know what gift you'd want if you had a $15,000 spending limit, couldn't give it away to charity or pay off loans on a house, horse or unicycle and you had to spend it on yourself. Feel free drop it in the Comments section of said blog. Or to put it another way: How would you--in one fell swoop-- spend a good portion of my yearly salary? My answer in the link here. Have a great holiday! My texture is the best fur, chinchilla Beyonce/Jay Z
12/21/2007 11:41:57 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 18, 2007
On Listening to Music While Writing Or Why The Last of the Mohicans Soundtrack Plays an Integral Role in My Getting Work In By Deadline
I don't think it would be a stretch to say that I have weird writing habits. I spend most of my writing time pacing around my room talking aloud to myseWlf, I'm most productive working during the Wesley-Snipes- in-Blade type hours of 12-4 AM, and I'm most comfortable typing flat on my back with the computer resting on my knees like I'm about to do a semi-intense set of sit-ups. But lately I've been most conscious of my inability to work without music. My writing friends seem to fall into or between two specific camps here. There is the "I could type an essay while sitting in the choral pit during a live performance by Blue Man Group with a special appearance by Gallagher, such is my ability to concentrate" camp and the "I can't hear the question you just asked because it would require taking off my noise-canceling headphones and leaving my panic room, which will ruin any chance I have of working today" camp. The polar ends on both sides suggest particularly neurotic behavior, but, as Google claims John Wayne said, "a man (or woman) writer has got to do what a man (or woman) writer's got to do." Now I have very specific music needs. I can't listen to any music that has words in it, because I end up thinking about those words rather than whatever acrostic poem I happen to be working on. Also, depending on the genre and the proximity to my deadline, the music changes in severity/intensity/genre. Here is the sampling of my playlist according to what I'm working on: Novel Chapters and Fiction: Spanish Guitar Magic.Reasoning: In high school I was walking past a Brookstone (note: could have been A Sharper Image), when I overheard the rapturous sounds of a guitar playing some latin-themed something. Entranced by said music, I entered the store and sat in one of those vibrating massage chairs for a little under an hour, or until I was kicked out, listening to the music. After inquiring what said music was, I bought the opened CD black market style off of one the cashiers for ten bucks. Anyway, this is the music that I listen to when writing my book or any work of fiction. It is a two hour playlist of Andres Segovia, Carlos Montoya and Manuel De Falla tearing it up Spanish Guitar Hero-style, and it is soothing, acoustic and has little to no words. It reminds me of what it might feel like if I was in the Spanish version of The Thomas Crowne Affair and for whatever reason, that thought makes me productive. Plus, it drowns out the hippies. Magazine Articles and Columns: Buena Vista Social Club and Jazz Compilation of Miles Davis/John ColtraneReasoning: I don't know why my writing seems to be obsessed with the sounds of Latin America, but there it is. Maybe I use this mix during non-fiction because the music has more flair and edge, or maybe the constant improvisational moods in the jazz mimic what I have to do as I'm piecing together a story. Or maybe I just dig horns. 54.8 Minutes Before Deadline Regardless of Genre: The Last of the Mohican SoundtrackReasoning: Um, have you ever seen Last of the Mohicans? Daniel Day Lewis is always running, and always throwing things, and there is serious sense of urgency. Especially in the song "Promentory". This music screams, "finish this or Magua will kill the gray hair's daughter!!!"Once this music is on, I'm all about the benjamins baby business. Probably because I only have 54.8 minutes till deadline. Anyway, I'm curious to see where and into what camp you fall. Pro- music? Con-music? Musically Neutral like the Swiss? And if you do slay music while writing, what does your playlist look like? Or perhaps more importantly, how many Rick Astley songs do you have on there? I await your thoughts via the Commentary. I Will, Find YouDaniel Day Lewis
12/18/2007 11:37:41 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Life Changingly Awesome Query Letter Part 6: The New York Times Book Review
Dear Mr. Sam Tanenhaus, In my opinion, there are three things that every man should do before he dies: 1. Ride a jet ski 2. Write a harshly worded letter to an online retailer and 3. Read The Mummy, the Will and the Crypt by John Bellairs. As a frail, precocious, but obviously gifted youth, I read said book, the sequel to Bellair's first Johnny Dixon mystery The Curse of the Blue Figurine, and was enraptured by the excitement, enthralled by the intrigue, and en fuego-ed by chapter ending lines like this: "Johnny could make out what the woman was saying. And the words made the hairs on the back of his neck stand on end." You're probably asking yourself right now: What were those words?!? Well, Bellairs made you wait till the following chapter to find out. And sometimes, depending on whether or not you'd had a nap after your snack, that could be the next day. But despite producing Mach 3 Turbo sharp suspense like that in 15 young adult books, Bellairs, according to a fairly accurate sounding Wikipedia entry, died in relative obscurity in Haverhill, MA, where, according to its tourism website picture gallery, the most interesting thing to do seems to involve a statue of a woman captured by Native Americans in 1697. And perhaps more importantly, Bellairs work was never featured in the Times Book Review. "Until Sam Tanenhaus accepted an idea that would change his life forever. In a good way. From Kevin Alexander." That idea, Samuel, is to write a 2000 word essay celebrating the 25th anniversary of the first publication of The Mummy, the Will and the Crypt. Although the essay will feature a lot of interesting behind-the-scenes tidbits about Bellairs and the book I mentioned before, especially why the illustration on the front of said book portrays the main character Johnny Dixon without a mouth and wearing embarrassingly tight, tapered blue pants, it will mainly re-focus on my childhood, and my painful but minor battle with slight iron deficiency. I can also do illustrations, for a nominal fee. Now Sammy, I a fool am not. I understand that the literary rigors of writing for the Times Sunday Review are, um, rigorous. You, the Internet 2.0 has led me to believe, even had to write a book called Literature Unbound, and this while you were in your 20s! Although sadly my father didn't donate enough money to his alma mater Dartmouth to get me wait-listed at an Ivy League school, I too am cultured. I've heard of or asked Yahoo!Answers about nearly every classic American author, I've seen the movie version of Jhumpa Lahiri's The Namesake, and I own cuff links and an English-French dictionary. But I'm much more than that. Because you don't have to be a Michael Crichton scholar or know the French word for grapefruit (pamplemousse!) to understand the American literary landscape, especially when most of what you're planning on turning in involves personal anecdotes. In the movie Rounders, Matt Damon says something to the effect that--during a game of poker-- you must put a man to a decision for all of his chips. Well, Samson, all of my chips are on the proverbial table. You've heard my opening statement, you know my argument, you've seen the evidence. It's time you found me guilty of an invincible idea, and sentenced me to 2000 words, preferably at $2 a pop. My contact info will follow. And if you need to get in touch quickly, just friend me on Facebook, then write your message on my wall. Part Time(s), LoverStevie Wonder
12/11/2007 11:26:18 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, December 04, 2007
The Special Edition Deleted Column with Director's Commentary
Hello Friends. You know how--when you, um hypothetically, buy the DVD of The Notebook-- there are all those special features and deleted scenes with Rachel McAdams and Ryan Gosling that you're so glad you got a chance to see, because they really have a great chemistry? Well consider this blog entry a sort of writing deleted scene fresh from the floor of the editorial cutting room. What you're about to read is an entry I wrote for my This Writer's Life column that wasn't used because it focused entirely too much on my personal as opposed to my professional writing life. Rather than just burying it in the time capsule in my backyard with the rest of my rejected works, I thought it would make a nice teaching point to show that--even after three years of writing a column--I still get things rejected. Plus, with global warming and everything, I think it's part of my duty to recycle, especially 1100 words worth of material. Anyway, here she is, for no extra charge, my Special Edition Deleted Column.
The Best of, What's Around
DMBSeveral weeks ago, I got a call from my mother. Normally, I get lots of calls from my mother, most of them focused around the infrequency with which I answer my phone, but I could tell from the tone of her voice that this was more serious. She informed me that my grandmother had rather unexpectedly gotten very sick very fast and that there was little that could be done. After a few moments of stunned silence, my mom then informed me that my grandmother had a request. She wanted me to write something for her to be read at an upcoming family gathering. “Did she specify what she wants me to write?” I asked my mom, hoping what she really wanted was some sort of 3 or 4 line rhyming poem, a pre-pubescent Kevin Alexander specialty. But I wasn’t going to get off that easy. “Whatever you want to do is fine, dear,” my mom said. “Grandma said you’d know just what to write.” After I hung up with my mom, I sat and thought about what I was going to do. I felt both honored and extremely nervous. I was upset, of course, as I love my grandmother and she’s played a large part in raising me and sickness and loss are never easy to deal with, but I also knew she was older now and she’d lived a great life and so I couldn’t pretend that a small part of my mind wasn’t expecting something like this. And seeing how I’m the only one in my family who writes anything longer than a grocery list, my grandparents had long ago asked me to write and read their eulogies when they passed. As a writer in a family of non-writers, you come to expect to handle these types of tasks, and, personally, I think they’re the most rewarding. Don’t get me wrong, I love and crave the vanity and personal pleasures of seeing my name in print and spend upwards of twenty minutes a day Googling myself in new and creative ways, but there is something so intimate and honorable about being given the chance to celebrate the life of someone you loved, something so emotionally powerful and important that you can’t help but be taken in by it. Writing is one of those rare skills that afford you the chance to take thought, emotion and coherency and put it towards the memory of another. But writing something honoring someone’s life after they’re gone is one thing. Doing it while they’re still alive is a completely different story. I spent the next week or so in a daze, my work falling off, my head clouded by the task at hand. No matter what I’m writing, I tend to go through three stages during the writing process. The first is elation, because I’m so excited about getting a new assignment. This usually consists mostly of me bragging to my friends about the cool and unique opportunity I’ve been afforded and why my life is so much more artistically profound than theirs. Other people tend not to like my elation phase. Standing in direct contradiction is the second phase, which could be most aptly summed up as the despondency phase. It’s during this phase that I realize the weight and breadth of said task, and begin to, in the words of my roommate, “lose my shit”. The one positive aspect of this phase is that my apartment gets very, very clean. The final phase is, of course, the “you’ve left yourself with no time to do anything else so you better sit your ass down and finish this before you get fired” phase, which is pretty much self-explanatory. Because of the uniqueness of this assignment and the limited time frame I was working in, I seemed to be experiencing all three phases simultaneously. I was obviously excited, but that excitement was crippled by a horrible fear of failure, and a voice in the back of my head that kept reminding me of the importance of the task at hand. Talking to Ramsey didn’t help much either. “Dude, you have to make this perfect, like some Gettysburg Address/Good Will Hunting type shit,” he said, when I told him about what I was expected to do. “Wow. That’s a lot of pressure. If I was you, I’d probably have completely freaked out and—as you know—I pretty much dominate pressure situations.” My main problem was that I didn’t know what sort of thing to write. Should it be some sort of eulogy-esque remembrance or a nostalgia-inducing poem or something funny to rise spirits? Should I get other family members involved? What about word count? After another week of sleepless stress, I finally decided to ask my grandfather. I’d been putting off talking to him about it, mostly because I feared that any more talk of my grandmother’s sickness would be too stressful for him. And, if I’m being honest with myself, I also kept quiet because I secretly fear bringing up sad or distressing topics, often taking painful lengths to avoid talking about them while internally freaking out. Not exactly healthy, I know. So it shouldn’t have come as a surprise that my grandfather was more than happy to talk about it. And when I asked about what specifically I should do, he laughed. “Kevin, Kevin, Kevin,” he said. “You think your grandmother will be concerned about the form of whatever you present? She’d be thrilled if you read from a science book, as long as it was you doing it. Just do something that will let her know how much we care about her. Maybe you make us laugh a little, maybe you make us cry, whatever, just so she knows we’re there and we’re thinking about her.” My grandfather paused for a little. “Oh, and one other thing.” “Yeah?” “Just make sure it’s not another one of those damn rhyming poems.” Freed from the shackles of my own mind, I wrote the entire thing one afternoon at my mother’s house, looking through some old pictures and albums. I’m presenting it to the family in three days. Hopefully, there are things in there to make our family laugh, cry and remember just what my grandmother means to us. And perhaps most importantly, none of it rhymes.
12/4/2007 2:57:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 27, 2007
On Deadlines and Self Examination
I am working on a deadline for Boston Magazine. The deadline is this Thursday. And, at the moment, that seems manageable. I am (mostly) done with the reporting, I have (partially) transcribed the interviews, I even (vaguely) know what I'm trying to say. Of course, there are other things for me to do as well, smaller-ish things, like preparing a presentation about the mechanics and literary devices employed by Philip Roth when beginning and ending chapters in The Human Stain, re-writing a portion of a chapter to turn into my workshop and writing, you know, this blog, but the deadline is the major looming thing in my life this week. The deadline rules. And this stresses me out. Now, in my "writing life", I have written several blogs, columns, and features about my procrastination issues. As my editors can surely attest, they are more than well-documented. They are, perhaps, over- documented. So this is not another recounting of the various techniques I actively and passively employ to facilitate not writing (examples I will not be giving: constantly getting up to refill my water, organizing my books by author then re-organizing them by genre, typing 200 words worth of swear words or catch phrases, etc.) . No sir. Totally not that. Instead, I am attempting to examine the psychology behind my dangerous and job-threatening need to procrastinate. Because if we can get under the hood and take a look-- to use a semi-incompatible cliche--maybe this baby will finally drive right. Onward self-examination! Reason 1: I need the pressure to focus.Analysis: Because I wait till the last moment to do things, I like to leave myself with little to no choice about whether or not I can work because--if I know I have time-- I will then rationalize doing something else, usually involving Netflix. Pressure leaves me no wiggle room, which forces me into a corner, which unleashes my creative side, which is something to behold a 4 AM. This excuse may have some legs. What My Dad Would Say: You are lazy and unbecoming of the Alexander lineage. What My Mom Would Say: I'm very proud of you, but I want you to get more sleep. Reason 2: I have an acute fear of failure and/or not knowing what I'm doing.Analysis: Every time I sit down to begin another article/blog/ chapter, I am stricken with the thoughts that I can't do it, I can't possibly pull off something again, that I will never write (blank) like the last (blank) that I wrote, and that I shouldn't even bother, and I should just get an internship at an Art Gallery. What My Dad Would Say: You're not a closer. And an internship at an Art Gallery sounds unpaid. What My Mom Would Say: You're the best writer ever, but I want you to get more sleep. Reason 3: If someone else is doing something, I need to also be doing that thing.Analysis: Like most people who spend their days locked up with their thoughts, I get lonely, even (or especially) when surrounded by hippies., which makes me susceptible to--like the title of R&B group 'Nuttin Nice's song says-- being "down for whateva". Also, people with 9-5 jobs don't "think I do anything all day", and always call me when they a) have a day off, b) want to go out during the week, c) want to do something stupid like go to Europe for 4 months, and can't find any takers. Of course, when I say "people with 9-5 jobs", i mean my friend Casey. What My Dad Would Say: If your friends jumped off the Tobin Bridge and into a low paying, non-health benefits filled "sea" of self- doubt, would you? Oh God, don't answer that. What My Mom Would Say: You're very unique, but I want you to get more sleep. Reason 4: I'm just lazy.Analysis: Maybe I'm just lazy. What My Dad Would Say: Yep. You nailed it. What My Mom Would Say: I agree with your father. Anyway, I don't have time for this. I have to go stress about my deadline while watching a documentary about the rise of R&B on VH1 Soul. I'm up to the part where they talk to Boyz II Men about Jodeci. Feel free to leave your own reasons as to why you think you procrastinate in a little something the Internet 2.0 likes to call the Comment(z) section and I'll try and update you on how things turn out. Let's get this money. Thank, You (live)Boyz II Men
11/27/2007 9:32:20 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 20, 2007
The Two Question Novel Quiz Part 3: Voice
In order to sell your novel, books recommend having a unique "voice" that separates you from the pack and wins you literary, commercial, and social-emotional praise. The fact that books also recommend that you be married to the chairman of Random House and/or Judith Regan is neither here nor there. But what kind of voice do you want to have? Do you want your voice to be strong and masculine like Hemingway and that dude who told Oprah he woke up on an airplane with no teeth or clever and flirty like Lauren Weisberger or whomever writes Candace Bushnell's books? If you said neither, books would point out that you're lying. Either way, to discover where your voice fits in on the voice spectrum, please take this short, two question quiz and then feel free to spend the rest of the week in a semi-concussed state of food coma remembering the vaguely worded story of Squanto and the Pilgrims before venturing to the mall at 5 AM on Black Friday to buy vanilla cookie candles at 40% off. It's totally worth it. Directions: Read then choose, then read then choose, then learn. 1. Your protagonist finds themselves seated across from their true love at the Olive Garden. Please describe said scene.A. The breadsticks were warm and garlic-scented and I was hungry. First, I was thirsty though and I ordered a whiskey and thought about bull fighting and other sports. I like sports. A girl was there, I think. B. Unless he's being ironic or something, the fact that Jeremy even considered taking me to an OG (in the burbs!!) is kind of ridic. Olive Garden's are full of ew people, and ew people cannot appreciate the fact that I squeezed into this Bottega Veneta Camel Shearling Shrug and these Jimmy Choo Biker Leather Flat Boots With Rabbit Fur Lining. I need like eleven Cosmo's. C. Music. The gentle hum of the synthesized version of "Hey Ya"reverberated off of the plush, faux-Italian decor. A cold rush came over me, a suspicious rush of season's past, a remembrance of things before, before a flood of emotions crept up on me like our vaguely mustachioed waiter. As Daphne ordered her Endless Pasta Bowl, I reflected on a time when the song of my love still played, still reflected towards me like a pool of reflective water. That my heart still beats is a wonder at all. I ordered the Tour of Italy and became dour. D. Don is famous for a lot of things, and most of those things have something to do with being a naughty, naughty boy. "Have you been a bad boy," I asked in a whisper, leaning over the table as the waiter brought the breadsticks. "You know I have," Don said, his crystal clear blue eyes running up and down my body. I picked up a breadstick, seductively. Three minutes later, we were doing it in the men's lavatory. 2. Your character finds themselves at an ATM machine needing money. How do they handle it?
A. We went to the woman at the bank and requested money. She said to use the machine. I told her I don't use machines. Walking home, I tried to think of what she meant. B. Jeremy made some joke about going "dutch" to dinner tonight, so I went to the ATM, the one down on Houston and Mott in Nolita by that cute brunch place Nolita House with the morning margarita's. Going "dutch" wasn't my problem. My problem was that as I was walking up to the ATM, I got my Purple Label Grey Metallic "Lizard" Crissy Evening Sandals stuck in a grate and I slipped, nearly ruining my Adriano Goldschmied Boyfriend Shorts and that cute top I borrowed from Kristin (whose new thing, apparently, is not eating). I should have moved to the Village. C. Doors. Opening and closing, exposing and then covering up. The automatic doors at the ATM remind me of the clapping hands of a babysitter I once had, a small Latina woman with strong, callused hands. Isn't life often like the closing and opening of doors, be they automatic, manual or otherwise? Friends become enemies, enemies, friends and the seasons pass with nay a look in the direction of God. I've forgotten my ATM card. D. "Where are we going to do it?" I asked Don, the bad boy actor. I felt bad. So bad that I kind of felt good. "I don't care baby, as long as it's hot and in public," Don said. He was smoking a cigarillo. "Well," I said, slyly plucking the cigarillo from his mouth and taking a long pull. "The ATM machine has a camera." "You're bad," Don said with a mischievous smile. "I know," I said. "I am bad." Key:
Mostly A's: Your sparse prose gives the bare minimum of details and doesn't really let us "inside". You pull it off, you're Hemingway. You don't, and you're (insert any male high school writer after just reading Death in the Afternoon by Hemingway). I'm pulling for you.
Mostly B's: Your voice is a little bit sexy and a little bit city. As long as your protagonist is 23-25 and working in a cool, creative, city job (fashion, magazines, advertising, corporate accounting, etc) with some boy trouble, you're pretty much already published.
Mostly C's: Oh, pseudo-literary. The eternal quest to flood the page with hyper-symbolic prose and internal reflection. When it's good, it's amazing, when it's bad, it's the worst. A little bit like sushi.
Mostly D's: You are Jackie Collins. And you are naughty.
Ok. Let me know where you stand in the comments. And--if you feel like your voice wasn't given a shout out-- feel free to drop where exactly you place yourself, preferably in that Hollywood movie-pitch style, "Tom Clancy meets E. Annie Proulx at Ken Follett's house". Don't use that one though, that's mine. I Wanna Be, RichCalloway
11/20/2007 2:01:37 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Pseudo-In-Depth Analysis of The Things I Read Online: Slate.com
As in gymnastics or morning visits to the bathroom, everyone has their own routines for visiting the Internet 2.0. Before I can safely get to "work", I scroll through a lengthy list of favorite blogs, news sites, social networking...networks, trendy sneaker information providers, and forums analyzing "The View" in an effort to get a more full and informed view of the world. And perhaps because of that finely tuned, cosmopolitan-esque view of said world, a lot of people should ask me, "What, Kevin, are those sites that provide you with such piercing insights and almost encyclopedic knowledge of other people's relationship statuses via The Facebook?" So--in an effort to answer that self-asked hypothetical question-- I am dropping a new, potentially recurring entry into my nest of recurring blog entries called, well, you can read the title. The point is to take a look at some of the sites that I read, give you some background on them, and then review them. Best case scenario, friends, is that you discover a new site of potential interest, worst case scenario, is that--somewhere down the line-- I attempt to submit something to one of these sites and, after a quick Google search, all of this comes back to bite me in the ass and I'm summarily blacklisted from participating in the Internet. Hmmm. Maybe this isn't a good idea. Slate.comSlate.com is an online news and culture magazine. According to its Advertising page (brief teaching moment: a good way to get a quick idea of how a magazine imagines their audience is to go to their "advertise with us" page and look at how they define themselves to advertisers and who they describe as their audience. It sounds kind of obvious, but it seemed entirely clever to me at the time I sorted it out), they attract 5 million unique visitors a month, although I don't know anyone outside of the journalism or writing worlds that doesn't just assume that Salon and Slate are--in the words of my roommate-- the same "online magazine thing". Journalists, on the other hand,--or, at least the ones that I associate with--assume that everyone is reading this particular online magazine thing. In fact, 86% of all conversations I have at Boston Mag start with, "Did you read __'s takedown of __ in Slate?" and then trail off into some sort lengthy debate as to whether you agree or disagree, usually followed by some sort of speculative, unconfirmed anecdote about the personal/professional life of the person who wrote it and then a call down to Ad Sales to see if there are any open-bar launch parties that night. That, friends, in a nutshell, is how good journalism is made. Anyway, Slate caters, if not specifically to journalists, then at least to people who spend a good deal of their time reading other magazines and newspapers, and they do it by acting like a meta-magazine; offering analysis, commentaries, and refutations of things written in other papers or magazines or blogs. Other online entities also do this (in fact, it's sort of an online specialty) but--since most of the people who write for Slate are seasoned journalists--you don't get that snarky "outsider attacking insider" feel that you get at a site like Gawker.com, and you can feel intelligent plagiarizing their opinions in an effort to sound more informed while making small talk on the subway. My one issue with Slate, which is most people's issue, is they seem to have a standard template for all of their pieces: think of some sort of contrary POV about a major issue/commonly prescribed notion, counter said argument using cleverly worded rhetorics, add many, many hyperlinks. When they pull it off, (which, admittedly, is most of the time) it comes off sounding fresh, new, and almost genius, but when they don't, it just sort of sounds like they all sat around brainstorming what would happen if every day was some sort of highbrow, literary version of Opposite Day. Either way, Slate does what any good culture/news mag should do; it infuriates, informs, and entertains, all while sparking debate. Plus, their movie critic Dana Stevens and I share similar tastes in films, which makes me feel smart. Anyway, as soon as I can sort it out, I'll give you a tasting plate of some classic, must-read Slate pieces. But, friends, since this is more of a conversation than anything else, I'm curious to get your own insights and opinions on sites that you read everyday, especially ones that are well-written, informative, and hilarious. So check up on those in the Comments. And yes, self promotion equals automatic disqualification. Come on now, you're better than that. Get out of my dreams, and into my car.Billy, Ocean
11/13/2007 10:17:25 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, November 06, 2007
Reviews of Books I Was Forced To Read in High School, Part 2: The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Brief Research Sidenote: In my long esteemed career of researching via the Web 2.0, I have come to love and look forward to the random factual tidbits provided for you by Wikipedia. For instance, where else would I have been able to discover that on an episode of "One Tree Hill", Lucas Scott reads a quote from The Scarlet Letter, or that the hip-hop group The Clipse features the lyric "Like a Scarlet Letter, for the world to see" on their mixtape "We Got It 4 Cheap: Vol. 1"? If you said nowhere, you're totally right. Eat it, World Book.
I read The Scarlet Letter during my freshman year of high school, which-- much like the book-- was a time of semi-specific love angst and poor clothing choices. The SL is by Nathaniel Hawthorne, a Bowdoin College Polar Bear, lifelong New Englander, and Concord, MA neighbor of two philosophizing writers with three names (Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson) whom I often confuse with each other. For those of you who don't know, The SL centers around a girl named Hester Prynne living on a 17th century Puritan settlement outside of Boston, who is forced to wear a big red A on her chest because she is an adulterer. The adultery in question is complicated, as her husband sent her ahead from England and allegedly never showed up, and God knows life in one of those Puritan settlements was kind of boring what with the hoeing and the witch hunting and what not, but, needless to say, once she got pregnant, the rumor mill (which was located next to the textile mill) abuzzed, and she got harangued. By the "town fathers". Seriously. This kind of stuff happened. As it turns out, other things also happened. Her long-lost husband was actually in town practicing medicine and using the creepy name Chillingworth. An eloquent minister is revealed to be the baby's daddy, which stresses him out. There is a meteor that looks like a red A. An escape to Europe is planned, then doesn't pan out. Revenge is sought by Chillingworth, then abandoned in frustration. Just think 17th century version of the movie "Something to Talk About" starring Julia Roberts and Dennis Quaid and I think you'll get it. Anyway, at the time of reading, I did not like The SL. As I recall, my analysis of the book was extensive. Using topical high school sophistry, I attempted a two-pronged attack, using the "Why were the Puritans so crazy?" argument and a less effective "personal experience with sin" component that pushed my grade into the low B's. I have since re-visited The SL (full disclosure: was forced to, in college) and can now better appreciate the themes in the book; sin, civilization vs the wild, old vs new, guilt, etc, but--what I've found looking back at these books-- is that, aside from The Great Gatsby, A Catcher in the Rye, and the underrated A Yellow Raft in Blue Water, I didn't "get" any of them while still in school and therefore, didn't like them. No doubt part of this can be blamed on the fact that I was probably "reading" these literary masterpieces while playing Goldeneye on Nintendo 64 and talking on my private phone line to my GF about whose house we were going to watch "Dawson's Creek" at, but still--for a man of words-- this is kind of embarrassing. But said embarrassment leads me to a question (or more of a statement about a question): I want to know which books you've read that--despite them receiving either critical, popular or social-emotional acclaim--you just really didn't like. Or "get". Especially if you lied about liking or "getting" them because you were ashamed to admit it and you didn't want that chick who sits across from you with the black rectangular framed glasses, the leather-bound notebook, and the smug, world-weary expression to have the satisfaction of knowing you didn't get them...or, you know, something like that. I await your embarrassment(z). I've got one hand in my pocket, and the other one is giving a high five
Alanis, Morissette
11/6/2007 7:40:36 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 30, 2007
(Potentially) Sellin' Out
It is true that there are a lot of benefits to the writing life. There are the hours, of course, that come with a flexible schedule, not to mention the clothing choices. For example, right now it is 10:30 AM, and I am wearing sweatpants and a long sleeve t-shirt, and I feel slightly overdressed. There is the allure of feeling like you're totally in charge of the work that you are creating (although that might just be a fiction, what with editors, and publishing houses, and agents trafficking in and molding your word play) and the rather selfish thought that you might have something tangible existing in this world long after you've exited. And, of course, there is the faint glimmer of hope that you might be "The Writer", the next someone, and famous and rich and able to afford a sick summer cottage on Lake George with a tire swing and one of those expensive looking gas grills. But, friends, as you all know, you can't have pro's without...um...non-pro's. And there are several non- pro's in the writing life. For one, money. I don't so much make any, as I do not make any, and I'm actually kind of successful. For two, loneliness. I spend much of my day staring, either at my computer, or out the window, or at the hippies who are sitting next to me at the coffee shop hand rolling clove cigarettes. Spending day after day in the company of your own thoughts is (probably) the quickest way to insanity, especially for someone whose third grade teacher described as "irritatingly social". With that said, every once in awhile, I start to dream about selling out. It happens a lot when I'm watching "The Office", and I think about how much I want to complain about my job, and be forced to make lunch choices from a vending machine or sue someone for wrongful termination. Anyway, if I ever do decide to stop "stickin' it to the Man" and start joining the Man's Wednesday night cribbage league, here are three jobs that I think a writer--like myself-- could successfully sell out for. 1. Company spokesperson. Companies have spokespeople, people who usually read and write press releases and try and put a good spin on terrible, terrible events, or disastrous stock plunges, or the rumor that Rosie and Lizzie Hasselbeck aren't "great friends". Modestly speaking, I think I would be great at this. I always liked debate, even if it meant taking a side of an issue I was opposed to, and I'm sure I could find a way to fire myself up about looking on the bright side of a tire recall or the seventh straight quarter of plummeting Skip-It sales. In fact, I'm ready to do this job right now. Someone hire me. I'll be your communications Rumpelstiltskin, spinning straw into gold, and--depending on my compensation package-- you won't even have to give me your first-born child. Think on it. 2. Corporate Communications Consultant. I kind of made this position up, but I'm almost positive it exists. I'd be like the guy who comes in when the company sets aside a day for special events, and--instead of soliciting trust falls-- makes some neat PowerPoint presentation about the endless possibilities of communicating effectively in the workplace. I would use a lot of buzzwords, like "synergy" and "proactive" and "boo yah" and snap and point a lot, when someone else said something I liked. I'd also be frustratingly cheerful, especially because I was getting 10 g's a class, and end the day with some sort of New Age breathing exercise. Wow, it's kind of scary how well thought out that was. 3. Totally Famous Actor. You know when someone says "you should be an actor" and you dismiss it by bashfully saying you could never do that, but in reality you think you would be really good at it, if only--while you were in high school-- your mother didn't crush your dreams of being on television by saying that your earlobes were "a little big for the camera", which forced you to spend a lot of time staring in the mirror at your earlobes, which caused you to stop wearing baseball caps, which forced you to shave your head, which effectively prevents you from using that cool hair stuff that celebrities these days use, which is probably the only reason you aren't in Vancouver right now, remaking "House Party 2" with Nick Canon? Yeah, me neither. Feel free to drop your own sell out jobs in the comments. And I know it's very annoying to be a Boston sports fan right now with their Dutch-Navy-in-the-1600s-like dominance, but if you'll allow me one indulgence: Happy Soxtober, baby. Ain't Nobody Humpin' Around,
Bobby, Brown
10/30/2007 9:07:39 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 23, 2007
The (Really Long) Two Question Novel Quiz Part 2: Know Thy Characters
Characters are, without question, the blood of life flowing through the veins of a novel. Without characters a novel would just be setting, and there would be more adverbs and long, flowery dense paragraphs describing said setting, which would no doubt increase the need for anti-depressants. But you can't just throw characters on the page, make them tongue kiss and call it a novel. No, sir. You need to know these characters like you know yourself or your friends or Elizabeth Hasselbeck.
Don't believe me? Fine. But maybe you'll believe my old friend Lajos Egri, who, in The Art of Dramatic Writing, states that, in order to truly make "tri-dimensional characters", you need to know their three 'ology's: Physiology, Sociology, and Psychology. And trust me, you do not want to mess with Lajos Egri, especially after he's been drinking whiskey. Now seeing how this is a two question quiz and not three, we have omitted psychology, but that matters not. I think you'll get the drift. So stop doing pushups in front of the mirror, mute "Will and Grace", and check up on this special, awkwardly long edition of The Two Question Novel Quiz. Directions: Pick the answer that most clearly coincides with what you know of your main character. 1. Describe everything you know about the physiology of your character.A. Casey is a girlish boy between 18-40 with terrible posture.
B. Casey is a really tall girlish boy in his mid-twenties with terrible posture and hips that don't lie.
C. Casey is a 6'8 girlish 26 year old boy with raven black hair, green eyes, freckles and the posture of a man who has spent most of his life in one of those stockades you see in The Pirates of the Caribbean. He's decent looking despite having thick ankles and uneven arms. And yet, his hips still don't lie.
D. At 6'8, Casey is registered as a giant in several Eastern European countries. A long, wiry 26 year old with raven black hair, greenish yellow eyes, and those light freckles that only show up in the sun, he has to deal with the fact that his right arm is 2 inches longer than the left and his ankles are so thick that they may be impossible to sprain. His feet are uncomfortably wide, which means he has to purchase New Balance running shoes because they come in widths. He has a fairly symmetrical face, although that contends with a gigantic head that he covers with a ten-gallon Stetson he calls "Izzy". Perhaps that explains his terrible posture and the birthmark of a lightning bolt fighting a wizard on his back. And after spending several summers in latin dance classes, his hips finally don't lie.2. What is the sociological situation your character faces?A. Drew is a kind of rich white boy who went to one of those schools where you don't come home after school and you have to wear sweaters. His parents are, like, aggressively not sweet.
B. Drew is a 22 year old upper-middle class white kid with a secure job selling Cutco knives door to door post college. He went to boarding school after his parents divorced and his father moved back to Ireland. His mom does drugs and cries while watching Grey's Anatomy repeats.
C. Drew is a 22 year old upper-middle class white kid from Weston, CT. He has a job right now selling Cutco knives, which is lucrative because he knows a lot of rich women with dull knives. Drew attended Choate after his parents split and then Connecticut College, where he double majored. His mother divorced his father, an Irish doctor, after finding out he had a second life in Seattle, WA, where he was dating an intern at a hospital. His mother smokes drugs and cries while watching Grey's Anatomy repeats. When this happens, Drew goes up in his room and plays video games.
D. Drew is a 22 year old upper-middle class white WASP from Weston, CT. He dislikes his current job selling Cutco knives but doesn't quit because he's made 7 grand in the past two months selling said knife sets to bored, rich friends of his mother, who always act impressed when he cuts a penny with a knife. After his parents divorced when he was 16, Drew attended Choate where he got mostly B's, and Conn College, where he majored in English and Dance and continued to get B's while dating girls one year younger than him. His mother is depressed, and has been ever since she found out that his father, a surgeon, large Republican party donor and Irish citizen, was leading a second life in Seattle, WA, where he lived in a trailer on a large tract of land and dated an intern at Seattle Grace named Meredith. During the days his mother sits around the house in fleece sweatpants, smoking marijuana out of a bowl she confiscated from him, eating Funions, and crying while watching several emotional episodes from the Second Season of Grey's Anatomy. When this happens, Drew goes up in his room and plays as the Dallas Stars in NHL 94 on his Sega Genesis, usually with the penalty for offsides turned off.Key: Mostly A's: Perhaps you haven't quite thought through just how long you're going to be with this character, mostly because you don't really seem to know anything about them. Maybe you two need to re- evaluate your relationship before moving forward in a serious manner. Really, it's not them, it's you. Mostly B's: You're getting there. You kind of know things about your character, and you've kind of started to flesh them out, and that's kind of good, but you better start stepping your game up if you want to make this character more than kind of believable. Nice job, kind of. Mostly C's: This is good. You've really thought about your character and started to develop specific, detailed backstory, which will guide you through the book. You might even have enough there to be able to pump out a first draft in less than three years. Please stop rubbing that fact in my face. Mostly D's: You have an obsessive, scarily encyclopedic knowledge of your made-up character that borders on unhealthy. You probably get into real life situations and find yourself thinking, "what would my character do here", which is troubling, especially if you're on a date. And worst of all (for us and the hope for normal social interactions), if you want to create successful Egri style "tri- dimensional" characters, this is probably where you need to be at. Congratulations? I Want To Know What Love Is, I Want You To Show MeForeigner
10/23/2007 1:30:09 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, October 18, 2007
True Tales of Embarrassment Via The Internet 2.0
TOW books--in celebration of the release of their first two books--has a series of embarrassing admissions by writers on their website. My terribly true, terribly embarrassing admission is up now. You can find it here.
And, just in case you thought I was the only one embarrassing myself from WD, Brian Klems also steps in with--in my opinion--the most fantastic admission of all time, which he can never run from now that the Internet 2.0 has it. Read it here.Sorry, Mom. Part 2 of the Two Question Novel Quiz is dropping tomorrow (or, you know, next Monday). You best make like Beyonce and check up on that. That's so, poision
10/18/2007 10:26:25 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, October 15, 2007
The (Re) Write Blog: Issues, Perils, and Semi-Solutions
As those of you who read the print column and a few, scattered previous entries on said blog may or may not be aware, I'm working on a novel to use as my thesis for my MFA and then use as "walking around money" while applying for a post-graduation job as a bartender in the Blue Sapphire Lounge aboard the Carnival Cruise line Ecstasy. As it stands in real time, one draft of said novel has been completed and I am now working on the re-writes.
Generally speaking, re-writes are easier than whipping up new, fresh drafts because you already see the themes in place and (hopefully) know where you're going to be pushing your characters. Unfortunately, "generally speaking" about my novel doesn't really work while writing it, and I have hit several rocky patches along the way, if by "rocky" I mean "impossibly frustrating, tear-inducing periods of intense melancholy". With that said, I am going to present three major problems I've faced during the re-writing process and the solutions (or non-solutions) to said problems. The thinking is that by seeing the issues I have, you can take steps to avoid some of your own...or at least write a very similar book to mine that will probably sell sooner.
Re-write Issue One: Introducing a new character that wasn't previously in the first draft.
Specifics: The first draft of my novel had a lot of dudes. And a few girls. Ok, like two girls. But there was a certain need for a girl (friend) that wasn't directly invested in the main plot line and would also provide the narrator with a fresh perspective. And would make fun of him. And be good at basketball. Like, really good.
Peril: New character means new early chapters, which means whatever interactions they have will influence the thoughts of the narrator throughout the book, which means you have to change more things, or at least make sure they stay consistent, which means more work, which sounds daunting especially when written down.
Solution: Create character with a personality based loosely on friend of friend and the athletic prowess of an average WNBA two guard, and have them meet on the basketball court. Write up brief background bio and keep relationship specific to this one place, ridding yourself of having to incorporate them into other scenes. Feel smart about it when you begin talking about the basketball court being a "metaphor for the bubble surrounding their relationship". Use the term "budding relationship dynamics" in your novel workshop class. Clear throat when nobody responds.
Re-write Issue Two: Realizing that you wrote some really, really, REALLY bad chapters. Kind of in the early middle.
Specifics: Chapters 4 and 5 are, in a word, unreadable. In two words, they're breathtakingly horrifying.
Peril: Completely deleting sh*tty chapters that bridge the story line together is--like jai alai-- a dangerous but necessary game to play. Not to mention, then you have to write two COMPLETELY new chapters in their place and we've talked previously about my work ethic.
Solution: Re-read chapter in Anne Lamott's Bird by Bird regarding re-writes. Pout for several days refusing to even look at book. Get embarrassed that you could create such unthinkably poor prose. Play Big Buck Hunter 3 with friends at local dive bar, vent about problem. Note that friends only become vaguely sympathetic/concerned when you're holding pitcher of beer. Go to Espresso Royale, avoid eye contact with hippies, create outline of things you need to salvage from said chapters to push book forward. Take those things. Delete the rest. Feel sensation similar to when putting out recycling.
Re-write Issue Three: Coming up with a working title for your book.
Specifics: Um, I don't have a working title for my book. I thought I said that.
Peril: Without even a working title, book feels like a really, really long uncited lit paper. Plus, it just sounds better when--at parties-- you can say, "Moving the conversation back to me, I'm currently in the throes of passionately re-writing my nove | |