Friday, March 28, 2008
The Quickest Thesis Insanity: Big Apple Weekend Edition
Friends, I am going to have to keep this short due to a ridiculous and fairly robust sprinkling of work on my plate today. The story I've been working on for Boston Mag recently doubled in size, which--while good for my sneaker addiction, clip file and ego--isn't awesome for my thesis. I have to turn around a third draft of it this weekend or risk getting flogged by my editor (Geoff--if you're reading this, I'm working on it right--ummm... wait. Why are you reading this?)

Meanwhile, on the thesis front, I am having trouble writing a crucial final speech that some would say will make or break the book. No pressure right? Luckily I NEVER overthink things. I'm just waiting for it to come to me in my sleep and translate directly onto the dictation machine I have hooked up to one of the several Alphasmarts I keep on my bedside table.

Also, I'm in NYC visiting Ramsey who, last night, informed me that his popularity with women is "cresting". I'm not sure how to interpret that. I did, however, just see a woman made almost entirely of plastic wearing boots that went up to her thighs. Take that, classiness!

Two final thoughts:

One: I just read a very insightful and interesting analysis on the weird, self-perpetuating marriage between celebrities and the paparazzi in the Atlantic Monthly called "Shooting Britney" (I read the Atlantic, NBD!). It's by David Samuels, a fantastic writer, and it allows people like me--who pretend like I'm too high-minded, literary, and above-the-fray to "slum" by reading about celebrities in US and InTouch and the like-- to read about celebrities and the like (it's okay since it's in the Atlantic!). It's also disturbingly surreal. You can find it here: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200804/britney-spears
Sidenote: (I also read The New Republic! I'm so nuanced!)

Two: I'm officially retiring the music of 1998. I think i've maxed out the usefulness of Sister Hazel and the Offspring. I've opted to back the music bus up another ten years to 1988. Get excited.

Enjoy whatever nuanced joys your weekend brings. We'll continue our friendship on Tuesday.

The,
Flame

Cheap Trick



3/28/2008 12:43:54 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [5] 
 Tuesday, March 25, 2008
The Two Question Novel Quiz Part 5: Secondary Characters
Friends, we're taking a brief respite from the Thesis Insanity to  
drop a quiz today. The insanity--though perpetually all-consuming for  
me--will return for you on Thursday. Know this.

Secondary characters are like the Chili's appetizer Triple Dipper of the  
novel world. First, you're not sure if you should even have them  
around, then you realize you like them, and by the end you kind of  
wish you hadn't ordered the chicken tacos as your main course.  
Without secondary characters, your main characters will  
spend most of the book talking about dream sequences, looking in the mirror
and having flashbacks. So it's important that you create full, well-rounded  
secondary characters to help carry the load. Although they don't get the
same spotlight as the main act, they still need to feel, act, think, yell, and purchase  
Certificates of Deposit in a real, real way. Because if they don't, not only  
will Michiko Kakutani not review your book for the NYTimes, she'll  
probably light it on fire and post the video on Youtube.

Directions: Read the questions then take a permanent marker and  
circle the letter that best corresponds to your own book on your  
computer screen. If you are at an Internet Cafe the directions don't  
change, they just become slightly more subversive.


1. For whatever reason, you keep including scenes in which your main  
character--a dude named Wendy-- goes to his local watering hole,  
Trinity Gardens, to drown his sorrow in Appletini's. The cocktail  
waitress there, Peter Pan, becomes an oft utilized secondary  
character. What details do you include to help shed light on Peter  
Pan's life?


A. Peter Pan has "shimmering" black hair AND above average dental work.

B. Peter Pan wears a wedding ring at the bar during the week, but  
takes it off on the weekends. She also has a child carseat on the  
front passenger side of her yellow Mazda Miata.

C. Peter Pan always says, "I got you babe" when Wendy puts in his  
drink orders, probably because of her love of Sonny and Cher (RIP!). She has
a scar on her chin from an incident involving her ex-husband, who was a Hell's  
Angel and she has the faded remains of a tattoo that says "Captain  
Ho--" someone on her left forearm. She wears purple contact lenses  
and tells men that they're real, until they really get to know her or  
realize that no one has purple eyes.

D. Peter Pan is married to Wendy.


2. If someone who'd read your book kidnapped you and forced you at  
gunpoint to name all of your secondary characters and give brief  
bios, you would:


A. Feel very uncomfortable, albeit slightly flattered that they read  
your book.

B. Be able to name them and give some general characteristics, but  
then be forced to rely on the improv class you took on a lark during  
your semester abroad in Australia.

C. Whip through the bio's, backgrounds, and mental makeup of all the  
characters in such a small but intense time period that the person  
who kidnapped you is overcome with emotions and asks you to lunch at  
Chili's for a Triple Dipper. You (politely) decline.

D. Explain that you had no "secondary" characters. They're all main  
characters in your heart. Then ask to be excused from the kidnapping
citing a technicality.

Answer Key:

Mostly A's: Hmmm. You don't so much know about your secondary  
characters as you do NOT know about them. Unsure as to whether or not  
you'd be able to give the police an accurate sketch if one of them  
hit you with their car. Mildly troubling.

Mostly B's: You're getting there, but you haven't fully committed to  
loving your secondary characters, which begs some questions about  
commitment and other issues that you should lie to your significant
other about.

Mostly C's: Yeah. You know your characters, have a good idea of  
what's going on in the background of their lives, and remain non-
flattered when felons ask you to lunch. Take me to book parties!

Mostly D's: I'm pretty sure you're talking about your protagonist.

How'd you do friends? Awesome? Unawesome? Intensely ambivalent?
Questions, Answers, Results, SAT Verbal scores, and other grievances  
can be aired in the Comments section.

You Make Me,
 Wanna

Usher



3/25/2008 11:35:19 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [17] 
 Thursday, March 20, 2008
The Quick(ish) Descent to Thesis Insanity: (Mostly) Redemptive Song
I had my meeting with my advisor yesterday, the big two hour kind of  
meeting where we went over my novel with fine-toothed combing  
mechanism, and I can report, confidently, that I didn't die. The  
scariest part was sitting in front of her with the manuscript and  
watching her move around her office (as if she was putting it off!),  
then finally sitting down, sighing and saying, "Well, um, ok."

But, friends, her intentions were neither cold-hearted nor snake-
like
. She had  good things to say (for the most part). It seems the  
re-writes I did brought the novel into coherence and upped the  
tension throughout. She loved certain scenes involving a character I  
added as sort of an afterthought, and she was able to think about my  
book in the sort of analytical way that smart people think about  
things. Okay, yes, she now hates my first chapter, and yes,  
apparently chapter four isn't exactly "logical by any sense of the  
word", but overall, not that bad! My favorite part of our two hour  
meeting involved her asking about whether I did something because of  
some sort of complicated, subtle symbolism when I think I just did it  
because I had seen a particularly moving episode of Friday Night  
Lights
right before I started to write.

Other highlights: "You could potentially keep this part if you just  
made it...hmmm...you made it much, much smarter. And funny."

"I'm having difficulty telling the difference between these two  
characters."
"Well, Jay has blond hair."
"Yeah, um, that wasn't really what I meant."

"This part kind of reads like a bad college guidebook."
"Like Barron's?"
"No. Like one that didn't get published."
"The Princeton Review?"
"Stop."

So now I have official orders. And strategy. I have to turn in the  
new ending to the book at the end of next week, all of the vignettes  
(my book has vignettes!) by the end of the following week and then  
make all of the changes that we talked about in this meeting before I  
turn it in to my advisor and reader on April 18. For anyone not  
keeping track at home, that's eight extra days that I didn't think I  
was going to have! I can write at least infinity words in eight days,  
so that has taken some of the pressure off. I now have time to play  
the Big Cat in several games of Stratego (editorial note: I am VERY  
good at Stratego. And it's cheating if you surround your flag with  
bombs) and occasionally shower.

Also, March Madness starts today. Everything--for the time being--is  
coming up Milhouse! Kevin. I assume this will change in the next 36 hours.  
Onward. I hope your weekend is chillaxed yet intensely fulfilling.

Gettin Jiggy,
Wit It

Will Smith



3/20/2008 1:55:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [7] 
 Tuesday, March 18, 2008
The Quick(ish) Descent to Thesis Insanity: Game On
Friends, I'm not exactly well.

I'm reaching the critical thesis crunch time and I am NOT in good  
shape. My advisor, having read a second draft of the ms, has informed  
me that the book needs "serious work" and she needs me to "work very  
very very hard" for my thesis to "matter", I have an ending that  
doesn't--on its face-- make any sense, and several of my chapters  
have the gaunt post- Castle Greyskull Skeletor look: just really the  
bones, a blue body and some purple makeup.

Today is March 18.
I need to turn in a copy of my thesis on April 10.
I can't do math but that seems like it's at the most three days from  
now.
I am (almost) officially freaking out.

So I find this a good time to start the official My Quick(ish)  
Descent to Thesis Insanity portion of my blog. From now until the  
manuscript is in the hands of whomever controls the graduate student  
office (or wherever we turn this in... crap, why don't i know  
this??!) I will be offering a deep, insightful dive into a place no  
one wants to go: the mind of an MFA student about to turn in and then  
defend a thesis that he's not entirely confident about to a group of  
professors also not entirely sold on said student. If that doesn't  
sound like a non-stop fun rollercoaster or at least Thunder Mountain,  
then I'm afraid you're probably being logical.

Everything else, at this point, seems like it will take too long.  
Working on anything outside the thesis, going to the gym to wail on  
various parts of my body
, text messaging, using emoticons or the  
restroom-- all of these things would take too much time away from my  
characters, especially the one I've almost entirely based on Ramsey.  
And while I have no problem doing it to Ramsey, I can't let Ramsey's  
pseudo character down.  I need a creativity IV, some sort of diaper  
system, and at least three hippies worth of granola if I'm going to  
make it this three week period without losing myself in the  
(insanity) music. I assume this will involve whiskey.

Anyway, this will be the channel I'm playing on until our April 10th  
deadline. As we get closer to the TD (thesis drop) day, blogs might  
get more frequent or deleted by my editor, depending on my coherency.  
But there will be at least two a week. And some pop culture. And lots  
and lots of the music of 1998 to guide us home.

And for those of you who want nothing to do with the QDTI, fear not--  
like most of the relationships on Saved by the Bell-- this portion of  
my blog will only last three(ish) weeks.

I have a tendency to wear my mind on my sleeve. I have a history of  
taking off my shirt.

One (to Three) Week(s),

Barenaked Ladies


ps- Oh yeah. We've switched the address of the site on the Interweb.  
It's now at blog.writersdigest.com/writerslife/ You can still get to  
it from the old address, but why make it harder on your computer?  
Please adjust your Internets accordingly.



3/18/2008 9:26:05 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [13] 
 Tuesday, March 11, 2008
A Television Show That Will Make You a Better Writer (and Make Me Irrationally Emotional)
There will be better and more coherent posts regarding the series  
finale of the Wire, but I just wanted to offer my final  
recommendation/plea as a writer. "The Wire"--for those who haven't  
heard/seen it-- was a show that was on for five seasons on HBO  
depicting inner-city Baltimore through all the different arms of city  
life: the drug trade, the city police department, the mayor's office,  
the unions, the newspaper, the city schools, etc. The series finale  
was last night. Like my profile on Friendster, it is now retired.  
And--although I do have a penchant for hyperbole-- I swear to you  
that I am not being overly dramatic when I say that "The Wire" is and  
will forever remain the best and most complete form of entertainment  
I have ever experienced. And that goes for books, movies, television,  
internet shows starring Michael Cera, AND my roommate performing  
"Kiss from a Rose" at the Japanese karaoke joint in the Fenway. And I  
love karaoke.

Each season is a chapter in the most complicated and utterly  
authentic tele-novel ever written. It was created by a former  
Baltimore Sun reporter and a former Baltimore detective, and the only  
writers they've brought on to collaborate with are urban crime  
novelists: George Pelecanos, Richard Price, Dennis Lehane, etc. And  
they just nail it. All the characters are so well developed, so real  
feeling, so spot-on with their dialogue, so perfectly placed with  
their own arcs, and internal conflicts, you can't help but grow  
despondently attached to them. I cried when my favorite character was  
killed. Legitimately. And he did (mostly) bad things.

I have been watching this show since it first came on, and although I  
normally take a loserish pride in staking any sort of trendy claim  
about discovering something, I have told everyone I've ever known to  
give it a chance. Anyone that will listen to me. I have pitched this  
show like I had some sort of major investment, like I would somehow  
benefit financially from its success, like it was written by one of  
my (financially well off!) siblings. But I don't have any sort of  
publicity deal. I just appreciate art and  think this show is  
important enough that everyone should watch it. Yes, it has bad  
language (authentic cop/drug dealer talk!), and violence, and other  
vices that may offend, but I guarantee that watching this show will  
improve your ability to see and develop full characters and recognize  
the greatness that comes with real authenticity in writing. The  
entire show sounds improvised and ad-libbed, but according to what  
I've read, hardly any of it deviates at all from the script, which is  
the true litmus test of real dialogue writing. Even my dad (MY dad!),  
who won't do anything I ask him and shies away from publicly  
admitting he helped create me, begrudgingly watched the first season,  
and ended up secretly watching all the other seasons behind my back  
because he didn't want to admit I was right. Friends, The Wire is a  
show for writers. Trust me on this. Rent the first season, watch the  
12 episodes, and if you don't like it or at least see what I mean, I  
will (probably) personally mail you a check for $8.99 in Netflix  
expenses. OK, so I won't write you a check but you will definitely
not be invited to my Annual Wire Anniversary Gala next March
(featuring Kim Kardashian!).

Ok. Whew. I'm sorry. I'm all choked up. I will now step down off of  
my soap box, dry my eyes and resume what's left of my regularly  
scheduled blog entry.

I am on deadline again for Boston Magazine, trying to finish up a  
quick essay piece re: an interesting phenomenon in city social  
circles. For fear of someone stealing my idea, I will NOT be more  
specific. My plan of attack is to write several hundred word blocks  
in stream-of-conscious fashion for two hours straight until I find  
something that actually sounds clever/accurate and then fashion my  
entire piece around that insight. FYI: I do NOT recommend this tactic  
for the GRE writing section.

This was really great, friends. Let's do it again Thursday.

Also, the songs of 1998 will resume with Thursdays entry, but I was  
reminded last night that every make out scene from BH 90210 had this  
song playing in the background, and so it needs to be all over my  
Internets. You win, Steve Sanders!

No, I don't want to fall in love (This world is only gonna break your  
heart). With you.

Wicked Game,
Chris Isaak



3/11/2008 10:44:15 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [19] 
 Thursday, March 06, 2008
Missed Opportunities, Nostalgia and (More!) Name Dropping

In keeping up with my theme of the week of reading something then writing about it, the New York Times (I still read the Times!) just published an article about an upcoming piece in Esquire (I also read Esquire!) entitled "Esquire Publishes a Diary That Isn't" that details how Esquire assigned a writer to write a first-person fictionalized account of Heath Ledger's last days. Because Ledger just died, Times cites the move as controversial but David Granger, the Esquire editor, defends the piece as just what Esquire does:

“It’s an earnest effort,” he said, adding that the magazine has tried to tackle fiction using a nonfiction playbook before. “We’ve been trying to assign fiction,” he said, “to make it topical, relevant. To go to writers with a headline or an idea.”

From what I know of the magazine, this is a path they've been riding down in a very real way for more than a year and, I think, is cool and promising for young fiction writers that like Esquire's style. I enjoy magazines that are willing to push boundaries (as long as they clearly label their efforts) and yes, I love Esquire. I might not always love everything they put in there, but I enjoy the creative efforts put forth. All I'm saying is that if Esquire wanted to casually date me, I would consider it. But telling you this is, of course, just an excuse to mention something about Esquire that is relevant to my own life. (If you're keeping track at home, I've now said the word Esquire 9 times in two paragraphs. Eat that, Lit Classes!)

 Several months ago, I spoke to (name drop!) Tom Chiarella, the Esquire fiction editor, when I was writing a profile of the writer James Boice, whose fiction first appeared in the pages of Esquire and closely resembled a fictional account of the Kobe Bryant rape accusations from several years ago, and he reiterated this push for relevant "urgent" fiction. Chiarella seems like one of those great editors who knows a lot about writing, life, and clever things to claim on your tax returns, but lacks the monstrous ego that you normally associate with people in those positions of power. We talked for over an hour about the magazine and good fiction and he'd also stated that they were looking for fresh, new voices for fiction and asked if there was anyone up in Boston that he should be checking out.

Of course, I recognized this as my "chance", this fluid, seminal moment of connection when a spot opens up and you have a window of opportunity to both show and tell, and that later on in life, after I was demanding 20 K for guest speaking fees and had my own live-in hairdresser/masseuse, I would look back on this moment with a bit of nostalgia as I was getting my sideburns evened out, but, alas, it was not to be so. My only short story-- something about dating a reality star while living in Zurich and pretending to be a travel writer-- needs at least eleven more drafts to be acceptable. So I said I would think about it, asked him if he liked Sam Lipsyte, and then we hung up. Then I think I (internally) cried at my explicit dropping of the ball and proceeded to eat several blueberry Ego Waffles with (NON) low calorie Mrs. Buttersworth AND real butter. Obviously, I'm totally over it.   

Anyway, I don't really remember what we were talking about. I'm overcome with emotions. Enjoy your weekend. I'm now going to wallow in self-pity until tomorrow night when I wallow in guacamole at my favorite Mexican restaurant.

I will never stop loving the songs of 1998.

All for,
You

Sister Hazel




3/6/2008 3:53:47 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [9] 
 Tuesday, March 04, 2008
On Virtual Breaks, Internal Monologues, and Reggie Bush
There is an article today in the NYT (fyi: I read the Times!) called "I Need a Virtual Break. No, really" in which the author discusses how he forcefully worked some peace and quiet away from all methods of communication into his routine and how it benefited his life. This rang true to me because I have serious issues letting go of my communication devices (literally. I fall asleep most nights clutching my cell phone with my computer on in my bed). This is not healthy.  

I've been on the other side of the technology coin. When I was finding myself (and other things) in Eastern Europe, I did not have a cell phone for 100 days. I wrote longhand in a journal-thing. I read 16 books. I even used phonebooths! I remember discussing these feelings of internal and external solitude with the Big Cat:
BC: Remember cell phones?
KA: What?
BC: Cell phones? Remember them?
KA: Yeah.
BC: They were pretty convenient.
KA: I know.

We'd spent so much time with ourselves and without the use of modern technology that we were starting to get nostalgic about it. On some levels, this was great. Internal reflection, peace of mind, and not having to ignore ubiquitous ":-(" messages from my father, once my younger brother taught him how to use the texting feature, were all hella (NorCal shout out!) positives. But then we rented a computer in Prague. And all bets were off.

We attacked the Internets like hungry dogs, each trying to wake up earlier to first get a piece of the world wide web action. The computer became a new, new thing to fight about, and our complete cold-turkey experience without it had done little to quell the internal feelings that us Web 2.0 humans feel: Namely, who has been friending me on Facebook?!?!

So I guess my point is this: as writers, we spend so much time with technology in one way or another (just by the act of sitting at our computer) that--for us, perhaps more than most-- actively cutting yourself off from that sort of thing is a hard, hard task. But writers especially need their time away from technology, away from the fast paced world of the 'Net, and within themselves. It helps us make connections, it helps us figure out what we're trying to do, and--most importantly-- it doesn't give us an excuse to go on thesuperficial.com and look at pictures of Kim Kardashian grinding with Reggie Bush.

Explain away your own technology-induced or fearing habits in the Comments section (located below!). I hope your weekend was well above-average.

Deja Vu,
(Uptown Baby)

Lord Tariq and Peter Gunz



3/4/2008 3:08:00 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [16]