Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| October, 2008 (1) |
| September, 2008 (7) |
| August, 2008 (11) |
| July, 2008 (11) |
| June, 2008 (11) |
| May, 2008 (12) |
| April, 2008 (11) |
| March, 2008 (15) |
| February, 2008 (11) |
| January, 2008 (12) |
| December, 2007 (9) |
| November, 2007 (14) |
| October, 2007 (17) |
| September, 2007 (13) |
| August, 2007 (8) |
| July, 2007 (6) |
| June, 2007 (10) |
| May, 2007 (4) |
| April, 2007 (7) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Blogroll
|
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007
10 Great Mistakes with Story by John Truby
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, As promised, in follow up to yesterday's online-exclusive interview with Hollywood script doctor John Truby, here are 10 Great Mistakes writers make with story:
Great Mistake 1: The story idea isn't original. Great Mistake 2: Writers often use the wrong genre to develop the idea, or they impose the pre-determined genre beats onto the idea instead of finding events that are original to the idea. Great Mistake 3: They think a hit movie script is all about finding the high concept premise. But they don't know how to extend the premise, from the two or three scenes suggested by the high concept to a 110-page script. Great Mistake 4: They don't know how to hang the story on the seven major story structure steps, so the plot fails to come out of character and the main character does not change. Great Mistake 5: They think of the hero as a separate individual with a list of superficial character traits instead of as part of a web of characters, each character structurally different from the others. Great Mistake 6: They try to create their plot using the three-act structure, which doesn't work and causes a weak middle, instead of using the 22 building blocks of every great story that builds the plot steadily from beginning to end. Great Mistake 7: They fail to give their hero a moral as well as an emotional weakness at the beginning of the story. Great Mistake 8: They don't know how to create the story world or how to connect it to the hero. Great Mistake 9: They think the story is carried in the dialogue, or they force the dialogue to do the work that structure should do. Great Mistake 10: They don't know that rewriting is a set of skills, just like plot and character. So they rewrite in the wrong order, and their second draft is worse than their first.
Please see my previous post for the full interview. John's book is The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller in bookstores now.
Keep Writing, Maria P.S. Here's sending good vibes to all our screenwriter friends on the picket lines. We appreciate the work you're doing to protect writer's rights!
Off the Page: author interview series | writing technique
Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:09:25 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, November 12, 2007
JOHN TRUBY ON STORY AND THE SCREENWRITERS STRIKE
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, I had the opportunity to interview ace Hollywood script doctor John Truby about his new book The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller. Here in this online-exclusive interview with Writer's Digest, he offers advice on developing a screen-worthy script, and shares his view of the screenwriters strike—it will be over, eventually, and you'll want to be ready with a good script to pitch! So, you're a Hollywood script doctor. What exactly does a script doctor do?The term "script doctor" refers to a range of writing jobs, from a complete rewrite to a dialogue polish. Usually I'm hired to fix the story. In screenwriting especially, story is everything. So I'm very busy. In your book, you talk a lot about "premise." Is it important for a writer to know the premise at the very beginning of writing a script?It is crucial, because this is the hardest step in the writing process and where 9 out of 10 writers go wrong. If you blow the premise, you cannot recover. The reason it is so hard is that you have so little to go on-only one line. That's why writers often fall back on constructing a premise that is a copy of a film they saw six months ago. Or they combine film copies, which they pitch as x meets y. They're not fooling anyone. The idea is still a copy. And that's deadly. The biggest reason a script is turned down is because it's "derivative," which simply means it is not original. Writers fail in the premise in three major ways. First, they don't know how to dig into the idea and find the "gold." In other words, what is truly original. Second, they don't know how to spot the structural problems that are embedded in the idea. Even the best idea has a number of them, and you have to spot them early so you can solve them before actually writing the script. Third, most writers don't know how to develop the idea properly. The chapter in my book on Premise takes writers through a number of really useful techniques to make their story truly unique, then helps them map out a full story that works. You write that dialogue isn't real talk; it's highly selective la nguage that could be real. Please explain this viewpoint. A story is really a sequence of highly selected events tracking a life change in a character. These are the essential moments in the person's life. The writer cuts out the boring or un-important parts. So every scene is laden with content, and that includes the dialogue. That doesn't mean that everything the characters say in every scene has life-changing importance. We usually refer to such dialogue as "on-the-nose," where the writer is giving a sermon to the audience. This is a disaster and the mark of an amateur. Good dialogue always walks a fine line between expressing content and sounding real. Good dialogue is always more intelligent, wittier, more metaphorical, and better argued than in real life, but because it occurs within dramatic moments, it sounds real and justified. You use the term "antiplot." Can you explain what you mean by antiplot? The plot chapter is the longest in The Anatomy of Story, along with the chapter on dialogue. That's because most writers underestimate plot. It's the most complex of all the story skills, but also the one that is most easily learned, because it's based on very specific craft techniques. In the beginning of the chapter I talk about some of the major types of plot that a writer must know to be a professional, including the "journey plot," "revelations plot" and what I call the "antiplot." Antiplot is really a collection of techniques that shifts the audience's attention from plot to character, and especially the subtleties of character. These techniques include point of view, shifting narrators, branching story structure, and non-chronological time. Antiplot is most common in independent film and "serious" fiction. Hollywood mainstream film, with its extreme emphasis on genre, is in many ways the opposite of antiplot. What films do you most recommend to writers who want to hone their storywriting technique? In The Anatomy of Story, I talk about hundreds of examples, not just films, but also novels, plays, short stories, and television. That's because great storytelling isn't unique to one medium. As the book's title implies, I see a story as organic, a living thing that grows, where all the parts of the story are interconnected. That's why each chapter covers a major storytelling skill, from the beginning of the writing process-premise-all the way to scene construction and dialogue. So permit me to suggest some stories to look at from each of the major storytelling skills. By the way, you'll notice I often recommend great films that have stood the test of time. I believe writers learn best using the apprentice method, where you see a story technique as it was actually used by a story master. Any one of these examples is a master class in storytelling. For premise: Tootsie, Big, Star Wars, Forrest GumpFor the 7 major structure steps: The Godfather, The Silence of the Lambs, The VerdictFor character: American Beauty, A Streetcar Named Desire, Pride and PrejudiceFor moral argument: The Seven Samurai, L.A. Confidential, Dances With Wolves, Emma, CasablancaFor story world: the Harry Potter books, The Lord of the Rings, It's A Wonderful Life, ChinatownFor symbol web: The Lord of the Rings, The Usual Suspects, The Matrix
For plot: The Godfather, The Usual Suspects, The Shawshank Redemption For scene weave: The Godfather II, The Empire Strikes Back, Goodfellas, L.A. ConfidentialFor scene construction and dialogue: Casablanca, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, Goodfellas, Pulp FictionWhat can writers from other genres-novels, nonfiction writing, etc.-learn from screenwriters? Because film is based on the cut, which is a split second shift from one character to another or one action line to another, screenwriting is the closest medium we have to what I call "pure story." There is no padding in a great script. The top professional screenwriters are excellent storytellers above all, along with whatever unique strengths they may bring to the table. And they all know that pure story is expressed primarily in the structure. I've had many novelists, playwrights and nonfiction writers take my classes. And they always tell me that the storytelling techniques they learned are totally applicable and extremely useful for what they write. How do you feel about writers doing script adaptations of their own books? I think writers should do the adaptation of their own books, since they have the original vision and voice. But only if they understand that screenwriting is all about story structure. To do a successful adaptation, you must first find the bones. That is what is necessary in the script. Then you can add and embellish where possible and desirable. The best technique I know of for finding the structure of any story is found in the plot section of The Anatomy of Story, where I go into great detail about the 22 key structure steps. This gives you a detailed map of your story from beginning to end, with all the beats connected under the surface in an unbreakable chain that builds steadily. Your book is mainly about craft and technique. Any advice for the business end of screenwriting-how does a writer break in? The biggest mistake writers make about the business of screenwriting is they think it's all about connections. Who you know. But 99.9% of writers don't have the mastery of story techniques to take advantage of a good connection when they finally meet one. The only sure way to break in is to write a great script. And that means a great story. Learn the craft of storytelling, apply it to an original idea, and you will succeed. That's why I wrote my book. The good news is that while storytelling is a complex craft, it can be learned. And you control that. It comes down to hard work, practice and a commitment to learning new storytelling techniques for as long as you write. Any thoughts about the screenwriters strike to share with us?The conventional wisdom is that Hollywood sells movie stars. Wrong. Hollywood is in the business of buying and selling story. That's what the audience loves. The only difference is what medium they watch it on. For a new generation, the internet is where they are going, more and more, to see those stories. Writers made a big mistake when the DVD came on the scene and they failed to insist on a fair percentage of that medium. We won't get fooled again. Don't miss tomorrow's post: John Truby's 10 Great Mistakes Writers Make with Story. Keep Writing, Maria Off the Page: author interview series | the writing life
Monday, November 12, 2007 3:03:40 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, November 08, 2007
OFF THE PAGE: Laurell K. Hamilton
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, I adore having this blog. For one thing it gives me infinite space for all of the things I'd like to fit in the magazine. But of course, there are space constraints we magazine editors are up against. With that I'd like to bring you an outtake of an interview I conducted with horror/fantasy writer Laurell K. Hamilton, author of the Anita Blake vampire series and the Merry Gentry fantasy series. Our WD Interviews often involve 2 or more hour long phone conversations. When transcribed this translates into more than 10,000 words and a 6-page feature typically clocks in at about 3,000. So here's what won't make it into print. For the complete interview with Laurell K. Hamilton, you can pick up our April 2008 Genre Fiction issue, available on newsstands next February (I know, it's crazy how far ahead we magazine folk work). Here's what Laurell K. Hamilton has to say about blogging: You have a great blog. Why do you blog, and how do you fit it into your routine?The blog is something I do first thing in the morning before I’ve done any writing, or last thing at the end of the day after I’ve done my writing. If I make a commitment to do something I try to do it well. I can’t just say well, there’s not time for writing today, the blog included. But I was a little confused about the blog when it first started. It feels private like a diary. It’s a very interesting form of writing. I went back to read essay writers. E.B. White is one of my favorite writers, he was an early influence on me. He’d done a series of essays for The New Yorker, I got that collection. I look at the blog as a collection of essays. So you hadn’t done any essay writing previously?Oh, I hate writing essays! They’re one of the hardest things for me to write because I have trouble writing short. Writers usually have one kind or another that they’re good at. Some people are absolutely amazing essay writers and a short piece is where they shine. Other people are good at short stories and novels. Novels are where I’m comfortable; I like huge works. So the blog was very difficult at first. But I’ve gotten better at it and more comfortable with it. I think having to do the blog on a regular basis, has helped me have more economy with language, which I think is always a good lesson for a writer to re-learn—especially a writer who has been successful, because they don’t edit you as you become successful. So it’s up to the writer to re-learn that economy of form. What was the purpose of starting your blog: To keep in touch with your fans? Or was it more of a personal thing for you? The helping the writing was an unexpected side-effect. It truthfully helped with writing the comic version of Guilty Pleasures and my husband Jonathan and I had a comic script. That actually helped me with the economy of language because you only have so many pages, but it was additionally to give something to the fans. Something that they could look at in between books. And also it was to help promote and keep the name out there. I cannot put a book out a month. So the blog is a way to let people know what I’m doing, to keep interest up, and also to give them something in between book releases so they can get a glimpse into it. Some fans said I write more detail about how I write the books than other people do. I’d agree with that. There’s a lot about your process in your blog.That’s how I learned, by reading other writers talk about how they write. It’s not a competition. There’s never enough good books out there. So if it can help people learn how to do it then great. But the writing process is individual. The fans seem very interested, though, even if they don’t want to write. They’re interested in how people write—it just fascinates people. To me it’s my job. But because I understand that since that’s the question I get asked most, I try to put in the blog what I’m writing, my schedule, etc. and I also try to explain how I come up with unique ideas. And that is the hardest thing actually: uniqueness. There are two things I don’t think can be taught, and those are the things you need most if you’re going to have a career. You need to find your unique voice and you need a unique vision. Keep Writing, Maria  blogs and online writing | Off the Page: author interview series | publishing news and views | the writing life | Writer's Digest news
Thursday, November 08, 2007 3:53:09 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Meet 90-year old debut author Millard Kaufman
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, Bless McSweeney's for publishing 90-year old debut novelist, Millard Kaufman, whose novel Bowl of Cherries has been compared ( in Publishers Weekly) to the work of Vonnegut, Heller and Camus. I wanted to line up a forum guest appearance/ live chat with Kaufman, but I'm told technology isn't his friend. I'm trying to get a phone interview, but in the mean time, please enjoy this video of Millard Kaufman discussing his work, courtesy of McSweeney's and You Tube. Keep Writing, Maria Off the Page: author interview series | publishing news and views | the writing life
Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:50:33 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Thursday, September 27, 2007
OFF THE PAGE: HUMOR WRITER JASON ROEDER
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, There never seems to be enough room in the print version of Writer's Digest to include all of the interviews I'd like to be able to run. So, I decided to bring a brief-but-essential interview series "Off The Page: the unbound WD Interview" right here to The Writer's Perspective. For this first "Off the Page" I'd like to introduce my favorite new funny man, Jason Roeder. You may be familiar with Jason from our pages, where he just started writing the new "Roeder Report" humor column in our Inkwell section. In our October issue, he wrote a piece about how to get in— and get out of—a writing group, check it out. Jason's also written humor for Salon, The New Yorker and McSweeney's among other prestigious publications. Jason is getting set to launch his debut book of humor: Oh, The Humanity! A Gentle Guide to Social Interaction for the Feeble Young Introvert (TOW Books). And he kindly decided to answer a few questions for all of you writerly types here on The Writer's Perspective. So, how does a writer get started writing humor?The way so many unhealthy addictions are nourished—the Internet. There are plenty of online humor mags, each with its own take on funny. You can also solicit more general-interest magazines. Salon was publishing very little humor when I sent in my first submission, but I got the attention of the right editor with the right material, so it ran. Do you do straight (non-funny) writing, too?Humor writing rarely pays well, so I have to sell out and contribute short stories to literary journals just for the cash flow. I actually have about 10,000 words of a novel-like substance. Who are your humor writing icons?Andy Rooney without a doubt! He’s not afraid to say the things about office supplies that everyone else wants to say. Take us through an average day in the life of a humor writer. Average? Nothing average about it. It’s all snowboards and Mountain Dew. Actually, at the moment, I’m an unemployed humor writer, which means I’m predisposed to sleeping through the afternoon until The People’s Court comes on. Tell the truth: How in the world did you get a book deal, anyway?My agent found out that John Warner would be heading up a new humor imprint, and she sent him my proposal. I realize that’s a bland and not particularly helpful sentence, but what might be more useful is the fact that John and I had a preexisting writer/editor rapport through mcsweeneys.net. So, above and beyond what the proposal offered, John knew that he had a writer who was pretty reliable and could take edits without torching the neighborhood. Even though I’d never been paid for contributing to the site, I had developed a worthwhile connection. Of course, if a shiny Sacagawea dollar just happened to fall out of the envelope when John opened it, who can say if it had any unintended influence? What's the most essential thing a writer needs to know about marketing his book?Well, we’ll have to see if the purchase numbers ultimately justify what I think I know—I mean, this may be a toxic observation—but I’ll say this: No one—not your editor, not your agent, not even the publicity department—should be as invested in promoting your book as you are. And if you’re a new writer, none of them will be, almost certainly. It seems unfair: You’ve done the writing, and now you just want to move on to not having any ideas for your next book. But that’s how it goes. It appears from the title of your book, that you hate introverts. Since many writers are introverts, I'm compelled to ask : Why do you hate introverts?If I hated introverts, then I’d be self-hating, which I am, but for other shameful reasons related to Iran’s nuclear program. Something tells me that this won’t be the last time I answer this question, though I doubt I’ll hear it from many people who have actually read the book. If you're so introverted, why did you let me interview you?You seemed non-threatening enough. I’m drunk. I was promised a puppy. Please leave your comments or questions for Jason here. Keep Writing, Maria Off the Page: author interview series
Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:19:15 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
|