<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Writer's Perspective by Maria Schneider</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/" />
  <link rel="self" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/SyndicationService.asmx/GetAtom" />
  <icon>favicon.ico</icon>
  <updated>2008-10-02T12:06:45.6743320-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>F+W Publications, Inc.</name>
  </author>
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/</id>
  <generator uri="http://www.dasblog.net" version="1.8.5223.2">DasBlog</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Thanks and goodbye!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Thanks+And+Goodbye.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,33193b6e-3351-4fb4-a51c-c0649beb4a25.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-10-02T11:24:57.8780000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-02T12:06:45.6743320-04:00</updated>
    <category term="blogs and online writing" label="blogs and online writing" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
            Just wanted to say a final farewell since I'm leaving WD a little earlier than expected.
            Thank you so much for your comments, your well wishes and good thoughts and especially
            for reading this blog. I believe they'll be ending future postings to The Writer's
            Perspective but I'm starting a new blog at editorunleashed.com next week so please
            stop by and say hi.<br /><br />
            I've so enjoyed my time here with you. 
            <br />
            Keep Writing,<br />
            Maria  
            <br /></div>
            <p>
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=33193b6e-3351-4fb4-a51c-c0649beb4a25" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>So long ... farewell... </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/So+Long++Farewell+.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,a8a33918-a499-4760-966e-f02d5a740947.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-26T09:06:19.7920000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-26T09:08:02.5405744-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="Writer's Digest news" label="Writer's Digest news" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
               I wanted to let you all know that I'm leaving my position as editor of Writer's Digest
               effective October 10. I'll be checking in and trying to chat more before I leave. 
               <br /><br />
               The reason I'm leaving is that they've appointed a new editorial director (Jane Friedman,
               editorial director of Writer's Digest Books) and we have very different visions for
               the direction of the magazine, so it seemed like a good time for me to check out. 
               <br /><br />
               I don't have a plan B yet, but I'll be sure to let you all know if I do figure it
               out. 
               <br /><br />
               Hey, if nothing else there's always writing, right?  ;) 
               <br /><br />
               I've always said, I was a writer when I took this gig and I'll be a writer when I
               leave. It's turned out to be more than just a decent gig, though, it's been an amazing
               ride. Thanks to all of you for sharing the ride with me.<br /><br />
               Keep Writing, 
               <br />
               Maria 
               <br /><br /><br /><br /></div>
              <p>
              </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=a8a33918-a499-4760-966e-f02d5a740947" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Announcing: The Great WD Writing Prompt Contest </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Announcing+The+Great+WD+Writing+Prompt+Contest+.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,801fae93-9967-4f2a-9ed7-47093334ba58.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-18T10:29:59.3320000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-01T08:55:31.5089252-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Inspiration" label="Inspiration" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="Writer's Digest news" label="Writer's Digest news" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing books" label="writing books" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
                     One of the most fun, creative and productive writing exercises I know of is coming
                     up with writing prompts, so I thought I'd hold a little contest here on "The Writer's
                     Perspective" and on our forum, to come up with the best writing prompt. 
                     <br /><br />
                     So if you've come up with a good writing prompt, let's hear it. You can post it here
                     in the comments section, or on our <a href="http://forum.writersdigest.com/category-view.asp?showall=true">forum</a>.<br /><br />
                     The only rules are keep the prompts PG-13 and fewer than 100 words. 
                     <br /><br />
                     This contest is open until end-of-day Wednesday (September 24). I'll chose my five
                     favorite prompts and put them up on our forum for a popular vote. The winner will
                     be announced Monday (September 29). [please note: the voting is being postponed until
                     October 13. Brian A. Klems, our online managing editor will be choosing his favorite
                     five prompts and posting them on our forum so please check our forum October 13.]<br /><br />
                     The winner will receive this very cool <b>2009 Writer's Digest Weekly Planner</b> and
                     be featured in an upcoming issue of <i>Writer's Digest</i> magazine!<br /></div>
                  <p>
                  </p>
                  <div align="center">
                    <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/wd-planner/">
                      <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/content/binary/Picture%201.jpg" border="0" />
                    </a>
                    <br />
                    <br />
                    <div align="left">
                      <i>
                        <b>Let the prompts begin! </b>
                      </i>
                      <br />
                      <br />
                        Keep Writing,<br />
                        Maria 
                        <br /></div>
                    <div align="left">
                      <br />
                    </div>
                    <br />
                    <div align="left">
                      <br />
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=801fae93-9967-4f2a-9ed7-47093334ba58" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Digital Publishing </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Digital+Publishing+.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,b7ee4ceb-a715-4a87-9b16-32bfcf4e8b4b.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-16T13:57:34.3830000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-16T15:01:06.2163061-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Digital Publishing " label="Digital Publishing " scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
                  There have been several recent articles on the independent publishing front that I
                  wanted to draw your attention toward. 
                  <br /><br />
                  First is from <i>Publishers Weekly</i> Editor Sara Nelson who argues that POD technology
                  is more cost-effective in the long run than traditional offset publishing: "<a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6593588.html">The
                  Summer of POD</a>."<br /><br />
                  Here's a short excerpt: 
                  <br /><i><span>"I understand that there are issues that still bother traditional publishers,
                  like what to do about a POD book always being more expensive to produce than a “regular”
                  offset one. To that I say, consider this: as the bestselling PublicAffairs/McClellan
                  example proves, it's probably better for a publisher to take the reduced profit on
                  an immediately available POD title rather than risk that the public losing interest
                  in the two weeks it could take stores to restock traditional versions. Besides, when
                  you factor in the cost of returns, you almost always will win by printing on demand."</span></i><br /><br />
                  Second, is this <a href="http://www.perseusdigital.com/constellation/pressrelease.php">press
                  release from the Perseus Books Group,</a> announcing a new digital initiative to offer
                  a full range of digital services--EBooks, POD, Short Print Run and marketing and distribution
                  services. This new service is aimed at small, independent and self-publishers. If
                  you fall into that category, I think this new service would be well worth exploring.<br /><br />
                  I'd love to hear about your experiences with self-publishing and where that trend
                  is heading. Please leave a comment here or on our WD <a href="http://forum.writersdigest.com/category-view.asp?showall=true">forum</a>. 
                  <br /><br />
                  Keep Writing,<br />
                  Maria  
                  <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></div>
                <p>
                </p>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=b7ee4ceb-a715-4a87-9b16-32bfcf4e8b4b" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stephenie Meyer and the first draft</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Stephenie+Meyer+And+The+First+Draft.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,d7c8161a-10e5-44ef-a720-ed81532bbe47.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-11T11:43:12.1830000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-11T12:56:56.9423472-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
            I've been editing a feature for an upcoming issue of <i>Writer's Digest</i>. It's
            entitled "Roughing up your First Draft." There's a quote from Ernest Hemingway in
            the lead:<br /><br /><div align="center">"The First Draft of Anything is Shit"<br /><br /><div align="left"><br /></div></div></div>
         In light of this quote, I've been thinking about Stephenie Meyer, author of the mega-selling <i>Twilight </i>series. 
         <br /><br />
         I'm not much for vampire stories myself, but I know a lot about Meyer and the Twilight
         series, due to being an industry observer, not to mention the mother of a teenage
         girl (Olivia who you may know as a frequent commenter on this blog). ;)<br /><br />
         Meyer—who in just a few years has achieved rock star status among teenage girls—has
         been writing what is probably the bestselling YA series since Harry Potter. She's
         selling lots and lots of books, not to mention movie options. 
         <br /><br />
         So you may have heard that this week, Meyer announced on her <a href="http://www.stepheniemeyer.com/">blog</a> that
         she won't be releasing her most recent book because the first draft was somehow leaked
         out to the Internet. Of course, you can guess what happened from there, it's everywhere.
         Meyer is so distressed over the situation that she's now refusing to release the book. 
         <br /><br />
         Wow, it's difficult for any writer to imagine what they might do in that same situation.
         How about you, what would you do if your first draft was released on the Internet
         without your permission? Let's hear it, drop me a comment or you can discuss on our <a href="http://forum.writersdigest.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=20944&amp;posts=2&amp;start=1">forum</a>. 
         <br /><br />
         Keep Writing,<br />
         Maria  
         <br /><br /><br /><br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=d7c8161a-10e5-44ef-a720-ed81532bbe47" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Maui Success Story</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Maui+Success+Story.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,50aced74-18ed-4b47-9444-34fadfb8240d.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-09T15:28:34.5740000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-09T15:49:05.0407731-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Inspiration" label="Inspiration" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="WritersDigest.tv" label="WritersDigest.tv" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing conferences" label="writing conferences" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
                        I'm finally recovering from the 6-hour jet lag from Hawaii following the Maui Writers
                        Conference and a week of frolicking on the big island—swimming in the wild with dolphins
                        and watching hot lava spill into the sea—talk about inspiration! 
                        <br /><br />
                        The Maui Writers Conference was fabulous. Brian wrote some great post-conference articles
                        including <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/10-basic-ingredients-of-a-successful-thriller/">Gary
                        Braver's 10 basic ingredients of a successful thriller</a> and <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/steve-berrys-8-rules-of-writing">Steve
                        Berry's 8 Rules of Writing</a>, both of which are pulled from sessions we attended. 
                        <br /><br />
                        But as always seems to happen with conferences, the most inspirational words came
                        from the mouths of the writers who are just on the cusp of making it. 
                        <br /><br />
                        Eldon Thompson first went to the Maui Writers Conference in 2000 to study with his
                        writer/hero Terry Brooks. In 2003, after multiple trips back to the conference and
                        much work on his manuscript, Thompson sold his 3-book fantasy trilogy <i>Legend of
                        Asahiel</i> to HarperCollins and he's just finished the screenplay adaptation of Terry
                        Brooks' Shanarra series.<br /><br />
                        It's success stories like this that make it all seem worthwhile. We'll be offering
                        video streaming of sessions from Maui coming soon via <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/videos/">WritersDigest.tv</a> so
                        be sure to check back. 
                        <br /><br />
                        Keep Writing, 
                        <br />
                        Maria 
                        <br /><br />
                        pictured below:  
                        <br />
                        Eldon Thompson at the Maui Writers Conference<br />
                        Maui Writers Conference opening ceremony<br /></div>
                    <p>
                    </p>
                    <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/content/binary/Eldon%20Thompson.jpg" border="0" />
                    <br />
                    <br />
                    <br />
                  </div>
                  <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/content/binary/Maui%20opening%20ceremony.jpg" border="0" />
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=50aced74-18ed-4b47-9444-34fadfb8240d" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Don'ts of Book Submissions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/The+Donts+Of+Book+Submissions.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,5025908c-43bd-4e17-ae7e-f6a63f655805.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-05T10:42:36.1120000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-05T10:59:29.5679359-04:00</updated>
    <category term="writing conferences" label="writing conferences" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Aloha writerly friends,<br /><br />
         I'm back from the Maui Writers Conference. It was definitely hard to drag myself into
         the office today, but I made it. Maria refused to come home until she had evened out
         her tan, so don't expect her back until early next week. 
         <br /><br />
         In the meantime, I thought I'd pass along these five don'ts that I picked up attending
         a panel at the conference. The three panelists, Elizabeth Evans (Reece Halsey North
         Agency), Catherine Fowler (Redwood Agency) and Robert Guinsler (Sterling Lord Literistic),
         said these are tips every writer should abide by:<br /><br /><u><b>The Don'ts</b></u><br /><br /><b>1. Don't send your full manuscript off the get go.</b> Only send what's requested
         in the particular agent's guidelines. (They almost always can be found online.) 
         <br /><b>2. Don't respond to a rejection letter or ask "why."</b> Just move on.<br /><b>3. Don't be rude or disrespectful</b>—rejection isn't personal, it's just part
         of the business.<br /><b>4. Don't submit to one agent at a time.</b> The industry is slow so it's unrealistic
         for agents to assume you haven't sent it to other people (unless an agent asks for
         an exclusive read).<br /><b>5. Don't resend a query or manuscript a day or two later with a note, "I found
         a mistake in my proposal and fixed it."</b> Once it's sent, it's sent. 
         <br /><br />
         I hope you didn't miss us too much. I definitely missed all of you—it's hard to survive
         a week without my writing family. Next time I'll see if I can get the <i>WD</i> jet
         to swing by and pick everyone up. I'm sure Maria can write that into the 2009 budget. 
         <br /><br />
         Take care of yourself and your writing,<br />
         Brian 
         <br /><br />
         Check out Brian's <a href="ct.ashx?id=5ea4b132-3c7a-4684-9c09-7bf71f1197eb&amp;url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.writersdigest.com%2fqq">Questions
         &amp; Quandaries blog</a>. 
         <br /><br /></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=5025908c-43bd-4e17-ae7e-f6a63f655805" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>5 Nifty Google Writing Tools</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/5+Nifty+Google+Writing+Tools.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,e60a689a-a848-483a-abf2-dcb5dfc52746.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-09-03T15:32:39.1730000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-05T09:46:01.1243647-04:00</updated>
    <category term="blogs and online writing" label="blogs and online writing" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="journalism" label="journalism" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing technique" label="writing technique" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Hi, writers, 
            <br /><br />
            Maria is likely sipping exotic neon cocktails and hanging out with top writers as
            the Maui Writers Conference wraps up in Hawaii, so this week I’m taking over The Writer’s
            Perspective and the <i>WD</i> fort in Cincinnati, wearing an old lei from a luau-themed
            office party. 
            <br /><br />
            I originally planned to blog about nationwide newspaper cuts (our local <i>Cincinnati
            Enquirer</i> mentioned today that 15 newsroom staffers have accepted buyouts), but
            I’m working on some great material for the January/February issue, so let’s go with
            a less grim topic—let’s go with some of my overly abused Google writing tools. 
            <br /><br />
            Here are five free, simple, nifty writing tricks I picked up as a reporter that can
            be surprisingly handy when editing or writing.<br /><br />
            •    <b>Google Phonebook:</b> Looking to hunt down the phone number
            of that mysterious source before deadline? Go to Google.com and type “phonebook: John
            Smith Nevada.” Now you have all the John Smiths in Nevada, and you didn’t need to
            root through any hulking yellow tomes. 
            <br /><br />
            •    <b>iGoogle: </b>My over-checked guilty pleasure. At iGoogle.com,
            you can set up a custom web page, and you can even tailor it to your own writing and
            reading ends with a database of free widgets. For instance, mine has both of my e-mail
            addresses plugged into it, seven news feeds, a word of the day, an artist of the day,
            a dictionary form, a thesaurus form, a daily literary quote and a strange “Writer’s
            Idea Bank” tool. Overkill? Probably. Perfect for compulsive e-mail-checking writers?
            Definitely. (Requires free Google account.)<br /><br />
            •    <b>Google Docs:</b> This is a relatively new one in my lineup,
            but one that I’m increasingly using. At docs.google.com you can find the tech behemoth’s
            free online word processor, which allows you to write, edit, save and even format
            your material as you would in a normal program. Upside: You can access your writing
            anywhere without a flash drive. Downside: No internet connection? Ut-oh. (Requires
            free Google account.)<br /><br />
            •    <b>Google Calculator:</b> I didn’t get into writing because I
            was good at math, so it’s a good thing search engines are. Simply type “456*993” into
            the browser and you’re a whiz. If you still remember what square roots are, you can
            do those, too. 
            <br /><br />
            •    <b>Define:</b> The crown jewel, crucial for helping your writing
            (or settling arguments) when you don’t have a dictionary or Internet connection handy.
            Text message Google with your cell phone (466453) and write “Define: Athabascan.”
            Soon enough, your mobile phone is telling you all about Alaska and Western Canada.
            Texting Google also works for movie times, weather and directions. 
            <br /><br />
            For more, visit <a href="http://google.com/help/features.html">google.com/help/features.html</a>.
            What are your favorite writing gadgets and widgets?<br /><br />
            Read on and write on,<br /><br />
            Zac<br /><br />
            --<br /><br />
            Zachary Petit<br /><i>WD</i> Managing Editor<br /><br /><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=e60a689a-a848-483a-abf2-dcb5dfc52746" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Off to the Maui Conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Off+To+The+Maui+Conference.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,5ea4b132-3c7a-4684-9c09-7bf71f1197eb.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-27T13:59:55.1090000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-27T14:01:17.8895355-04:00</updated>
    <category term="writing conferences" label="writing conferences" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Hey all,<br /><br />
         Maria and I are packing our bags and ready to head out to the Maui Writers Conference—oh
         the hardships of being an editor (insert smilie face here). She wanted to post, but
         was too busy trying to locate a reasonably-priced grass skirt on eBay, so I'm filling
         in. Thankfully, I already own one. 
         <br /><br />
         Not much new to report today, but we do have a favor to ask: We're looking to improve
         our online efforts and hope you're willing to spend a few minutes to complete an online
         survey about your Internet habits. Your response will help us serve you better and
         make WritersDigest.com an even better resource for writers. <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=834lrPFz2HkZ4bjwmc38fw_3d_3d">Give
         us your feedback here!</a><br /><br />
         Maria will check in on Friday and update everyone on notable events at the conference.
         And if she can drag me away from the beach, I will too—as long as I'm allowed to type
         while wearing my grass skirt. 
         <br /><br />
         Take care of yourself and your writing,<br />
         Brian<br /><br />
         Check out Brian's <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/qq">Questions &amp; Quandaries
         blog</a>. 
         <br /><p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=5ea4b132-3c7a-4684-9c09-7bf71f1197eb" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alegra Clarke's latest entry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Alegra+Clarkes+Latest+Entry.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,dae0a830-49f4-473a-a0d8-925c5fe1ca17.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-25T10:10:24.1920000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-25T10:28:24.1629507-04:00</updated>
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Hi Writers,<br /><i>Writer's Digest</i> 2007 Annual Competition winner <a href="http://writersdigest.com/article/annualwinners76">Alegra
            Clarke</a> has been updating us on her progress to get her novel published. <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Our+New+York+Trip+To+Meet+Literary+Agents.aspx">Here</a> are
            photos of our trip to New York. And <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Alegra+Clarke+On+Her+New+York+Trip+To+Meet+Agents.aspx">here</a> is
            her last post about her trip to New York to meet with agents. 
            <br /><br />
            Alegra's latest entry: 
            <br /><br /><i>Before I went to NYC the inevitable question, 'So, what do you write?' resulted
            in one of my best 'Wow! Great day we are having!' smiles and an under-the-breath answer
            of, 'Oh, you know, I mostly like to write words, I aim for complete sentences, and
            I really like paragraphs…' 
            <br /><br />
            I had not found the genre for the novel and its absence made me feel unsettled, as
            if any moment my writer status was going to be revoked. During this time my husband
            tried to reassure me by saying, 'just the fact that you think like this is proof that
            you are hardwired to be a writer.' I think he was insinuating something about me having
            'a tendency towards anxiety' or an 'overactive imagination.' But it wasn't either
            of these things (really it wasn't!), it was because I understood what having a genre
            or a solid 'elevator pitch' meant. It meant I had a solid grip on the story.<br /><br />
            I have spent the last two months since the NYC trip plotting, testing my plot, researching,
            plotting again, sending my ideas to Joel Gotler, whose patience and generosity with
            me is enormous, until finally I could feel it and see it; the plot, the story I wanted
            to tell. With this came the knowledge of genre. I can now confidently say, 'I am writing
            a psychological thriller.' And believe me, for the last few weeks I have rolled the
            words around with obnoxious glee, harassing my friends with, 'Ask me what I write…go
            on, I dare you!'<br /><br />
            It has been a wild journey and I think it is only about to get wilder. In fact, I
            am depending on it. The original novel I wrote I can now see as a passionate and sincere
            effort at beating around the bush. That manuscript has become a fertile pile of compost
            for growing short stories. It might even be gestating a novel or two. But it isn't
            the novel I am now writing. What I have now is the storyline the other draft was circling
            around. The learning process has been so accelerated that at times it is unnerving.
            I look back at something I wrote even five months ago and think, 'How could I have
            not missed that fatal flaw? Why did I not get something so simple and obvious?' All
            I can do is reassure myself that this is proof that I am improving and keep on with
            keeping on.<br /><br />
            I am now in the last few months of research and plotting before I dive into the actual
            writing. I am doing things very differently this time by plotting in advance. I have
            always admired writers who can sit down with an idea or a question and pour out a
            novel in one draft, revise it and then be done. I am not that kind of writer - at
            least not at this stage.  And if I had a penny for every edit I did I would be
            one wealthy woman. 
            <br /><br />
            I personally don’t believe a dark story can be told halfway, it is a world that must
            be entered into completely. I have been organizing things in preparation for diving
            into the writing of this novel as opposed to my first attempt that was often written
            with one or both of my children hanging off of me like a jungle gym or engaging me
            in a chorus line of “No! Don’t touch that electrical socket! No! Don’t put your sister
            in the toilet!” 
            <br /><br />
            The last few months since NYC have felt like preparing for an extended journey. I
            was recently stunned by watching Heath Ledger in the Dark Knight because of how he
            intensely embodied some of the qualities of 'evil' I am hoping to explore in writing.
            I have always been fascinated by what it takes for an actor to take on a disturbing
            role and now I am about to embark on finding out what it will take for me as a writer.
            I think the most obvious answer is, “Lots of chocolate and coffee.” But I might be
            oversimplifying things.</i><br /><br /><br />
            Alegra will be updating us on her quest to get her novel published so stay tuned for
            more.<br /><br />
            Keep Writing,<br />
            Maria 
            <br /><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=dae0a830-49f4-473a-a0d8-925c5fe1ca17" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Speaking of crazy slush piles...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Speaking+Of+Crazy+Slush+Piles.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,2ba80ea6-5e1e-478a-83b6-6dcc6853b440.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-21T15:38:10.3870000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-22T10:31:50.0544507-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
               Thanks to all who spoke their piece on my previous post. Great discussion, feel free
               to continue the dialogue.<br /><br />
               The issue Charlotte Cook brought up though, about facing an overwhelming slush pile,
               is something that's a widespread problem in the publishing industry.<br /><br />
               And I found an article on BookSeller.com "<a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/in-depth/feature/47161-the-slush-pile-goes-online.html">The
               Slush Pile Goes Online</a>" that has a lot of great info about this move to get the
               public to vet the slush, so to speak. I've been thinking about this since around the
               Writer's Digest office we've been chatting about HarperCollins soon-to-launch <a href="http://www.authonomy.com/">Authonomy</a> project,
               in which writers are invited to post lengthy excerpts from their novel for peer review
               and ostensibly recommendation for publication by HarperCollins. I'll post more on
               this when Authonomy actually launches. 
               <br /><br />
               But in the mean time, here's a brief excerpt from the Bookseller.com piece:<br /><i><strong></strong></i><p><strong><i>HarperCollins ahead</i></strong></p><p><i>With its eye closely trained on digital opportunities, HarperCollins is now developing
                  its own peer-review website for unpublished writers. Rahim Hirji, HC corporate strategy
                  manager, says: "We realise there are talented would-be authors out there, and also
                  recognise the onset of digital. We tried to think about those two things together
                  to look at how we could utilise the internet in finding new talent."</i></p><p><i>Would-be authors will be asked to submit all, or at least 10,000 words, of their
                  work so that it can be reviewed by other writers or those looking for talent. "We
                  are using the democratic nature of the internet, where people like to give opinions
                  and review and rate work," Hirji says. "There are two sides of the project: the cream
                  of the crop rising in the sense of the best reviews, but also we will put the reviewers
                  into their own leagues."</i></p><i>The site, authonomy.com, is provisionally scheduled to go live in February 2008.
               Hirji adds: "It’s difficult for publishers to go through every manuscript that comes
               in, so we look to agents. We wanted to create a site where talent is showcased. It’s
               not just a marketing exercise; we are looking to source talent in new ways."<br /></i><br /><br />
               So what's your take on the movement to bring the slush pile to the people? Good trend
               or not? Let's hear it. 
               <br /><br />
               Keep Writing,<br />
               Maria 
               <br /></div>
              <p>
              </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=2ba80ea6-5e1e-478a-83b6-6dcc6853b440" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Writers are Readers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Writers+Are+Readers.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,98fcdea1-e07c-4624-9d77-ea4e958ade8f.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-19T10:42:18.5550000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-19T10:50:49.7205974-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Inspiration" label="Inspiration" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br /><i>Publishers Weekly</i> published an essay last week "<a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6585796.html?industryid=48383">Two-Way-Street</a>"
            by Charlotte Cook.<br /><br />
            Cook, an independent publisher of her own book line, Komenar Publishing, was the subject
            of a short profile in <i>Writer's Digest</i> last year. She writes that she was deluged
            with queries, phone calls and submissions after that article came out. It seems like
            attention would be a good thing for a small publishing house. 
            <br /><br />
            But here's the rub: Cook writes that even with all of the attention Komenar received
            for that article in <i>WD</i>, they've seen little impact in the way of sales. 
            <br /><br />
            I suppose the implication here is that writers aren't supporting the industry that
            they're asking to support them. This makes me sad on a number of levels, but especially
            because I don't believe it's an accurate assumption to draw from one publisher's experience. 
            <br /><br />
            I think, if anything, writers are the heaviest readers and the heartiest supporters
            of the book industry. 
            <br /><br />
            So, in the spirit of solidarity with your fellow writers, I'd love to hear your comments
            on what you're doing to support the struggling book industry. 
            <br /><br />
            "A writer is a reader moved to emulation."<br />
            -Saul Bellow<br /><br />
            Keep Writing,<br />
            Maria 
            <br /><br /><br /></div>
            <p>
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=98fcdea1-e07c-4624-9d77-ea4e958ade8f" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Writer's Digest TV: Lee Child</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Writers+Digest+TV+Lee+Child.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,e7d5d17e-7e6c-44fb-a664-53faf81367a5.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-18T13:49:31.5690000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-18T13:50:07.3501142-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Inspiration" label="Inspiration" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="WritersDigest.tv" label="WritersDigest.tv" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing technique" label="writing technique" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Hi Writers,<br />
         Another video today--I know, I spoil you. 
         <br /><br />
         Today's video is an interview with Lee Child, author of the spectacular Jack Reacher
         series. Here Lee talks about why he switches between first and third person point-of-view
         in his novels.<br /><br />
         Keep Writing,<br />
         Maria 
         <br /><p></p><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AcW9CY6aLw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="390" width="480"></embed></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=e7d5d17e-7e6c-44fb-a664-53faf81367a5" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Writer's Digest TV: M.J. Rose  </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Writers+Digest+TV+MJ+Rose++.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,c2e38429-21c6-41f8-b61c-22eae87038f6.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-14T10:22:31.0140000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-14T10:23:17.3888307-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="WritersDigest.tv" label="WritersDigest.tv" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
            It's another visual aid bonus day here on the Writer's Perspective! 
            <br /><br />
            Here's a short video interview with bestselling author and Writer's Digest marketing
            columnist M.J. Rose, who knows more about marketing books than anyone I've ever met.
            She's a true industry dynamo and visionary. Check her out here.<br /><br />
            Keep Writing,<br />
            Maria 
            <br /></div>
            <p>
            </p>
            <embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AcW9HY6aLw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="390" width="480">
            </embed>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=c2e38429-21c6-41f8-b61c-22eae87038f6" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Free Books for Funny People </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Free+Books+For+Funny+People+.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,8634b3e2-24ed-4132-b92f-8f574afd2572.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-13T10:43:48.1670000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-13T10:46:25.9201365-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
               I wanted to let you all know that TOW Books, a humor book imprint here at F+W Media
               is offering free digital downloads of their books, including that of my favorite humorist,
               Jason Roeder who writes the Roeder Report for <i>Writer's Digest</i>.<br /><br />
               If you're not familiar with Jason, here's one of his recent columns:<br /><br /><div id="PageTitle" class="artmCategoryArticleTitle"><i>The Roeder Report: Just Trying
                  to Be Nice</i></div><!--END Page Title --><!--BEGIN Content Body //--><div id="artmArticle"><div class="inscription"><i>by Jason Roeder</i></div><div id="artmArticleContent"><i><em><br />
                     “Your story puts my navel-<br />
                     gazing claptrap into reassuring perspective.”<br /><br />
                     “I’ve never considered literacy a mixed blessing until now.”<br /><br />
                     “Did you outsource this story to the dumbest squirrel you could find?”</em><br /><br />
                     A few years ago, I shared a short story with my writing group. It was a speculative
                     work that dared to ask, “What if the circus took over the world?” The comments above
                     were the three most encouraging I received from my cohorts. Of the two remaining members
                     of my group, one handed me back my heavily wept-upon manuscript without a word, while
                     the other simply dropped out of society. 
                     <br /><br />
                     But it wasn’t the criticism that bothered me; it was the brutality of it, the absolute
                     absence of tact or empathy. It didn’t have to be like that. If my group had followed
                     the suggestions below, I might not have lost confidence in my story. Instead, it just
                     gathers dust at the bottom of a drawer—in the issue of <em>The New Yorker</em> that
                     published it with no changes whatsoever.<br /><br /><strong>1. SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE.</strong><br />
                     You can usually come up with at least one morsel of genuine praise: “I love your use
                     of sensory details,” “This story hardly triggered my gag reflex at all” or “Outstanding
                     work. You should definitely consider submitting it to a journal with no stated plagiarism
                     policy.” A small dose of encouragement demonstrates that you’ve been evenhanded, and
                     when you get around to making more critical comments—or feeding the pages of the manuscript
                     into the fireplace, shrieking, “Back! Back to the hell from which you came!”—you already
                     will have put them into a more balanced context.<br /><br /><strong>2. PLEAD IGNORANCE.</strong><br />
                     Sometimes it helps to qualify a critical remark by emphasizing your unfitness in making
                     it. For example, when you’re handed an atrocious J.R.R. Tolkien knock-off, you can
                     say, “I’m not sure why you devoted the entire 23 pages to having the elf king carefully
                     review the prospectus for his new Vanguard mutual fund, but I don’t read much fantasy.”
                     Or, when presented with an awful horror story: “While I personally might not find
                     5,000 words about bubble baths particularly frightening, I’m probably missing something
                     that regular horror readers would pick up right away.” 
                     <br /><strong><br />
                     3. GIVE THE WRITER A KITTEN.</strong><br />
                     Sometimes, there’s no rhetorical maneuver to bail you out. Sometimes you read something
                     that makes you wish you could take the English language in your arms and reassure
                     it that the bad man with the 900-word sentences isn’t going to hurt it anymore. If
                     there’s no way to soft-pedal your comments, you might as well do something nice to
                     compensate. If no kitten is available, consider giving the writer—along with the feedback
                     you’ll never be forgiven for—a day of beauty at a spa or some gourmet preserves. And
                     then run like hell.<br /><br /></i>You can get free digital downloads of many books in the TOW Books line <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/towbooks/">here</a>.<br />
                     Keep Writing,<br />
                     Maria 
                     <br /><br /><br /></div></div><br /></div>
              <p>
              </p>
              <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/article/towbooks/">
                <img src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/content/binary/Z1361-Oh-Humanity.jpg" border="0" />
              </a>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=8634b3e2-24ed-4132-b92f-8f574afd2572" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Writer's Digest TV: Interview with David Baldacci</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Writers+Digest+TV+Interview+With+David+Baldacci.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,ef2fcaf3-0bd1-432c-b642-e41b938612c6.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-12T13:55:24.4200000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-12T13:58:24.0134361-04:00</updated>
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="WritersDigest.tv" label="WritersDigest.tv" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing conferences" label="writing conferences" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing technique" label="writing technique" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
            If there's one thing I've learned from spending time with all the thriller writers
            at ThrillerFest 08, it's that the adage, "write what you know" holds little merit.<br /><br />
            Here's another short Q&amp;A I did with David Baldacci, in which he discusses the
            merits of writing what you don't know.<br /><br />
            Keep Writing, 
            <br /></div>
            <p>
            </p>
         Maria 
         <br /><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AcW9Fo6aLw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="390" width="480"></embed></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=ef2fcaf3-0bd1-432c-b642-e41b938612c6" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Writer's Digest TV: Sandra Brown </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Writers+Digest+TV+Sandra+Brown+.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,ca5da926-f6fc-45ec-bec1-e10fa4ac32f5.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-06T14:22:17.0010000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T12:34:19.5445657-04:00</updated>
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing conferences" label="writing conferences" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing technique" label="writing technique" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="WritersDigest.tv" label="WritersDigest.tv" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="Inspiration" label="Inspiration" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
                     Remember back last month when I was at <a href="http://www.thrillerwriters.org/">ThrillerFest</a>,
                     the great writing conference/party thrown by the International Thriller Writers? Well,
                     I got the chance to do some video interviews with a few thriller luminaries, including
                     the amazing Sandra Brown.<br /><br />
                     So here's a a short (around 4 minutes) Q&amp;A I did with Sandra, in which I ask the
                     brilliant question: So how do you get to be Thriller Master anyway, do you have to
                     kill someone! 
                     <br />
                     (I don't think Diane Sawyer has anything to worry about). 
                     <br /><br />
                     Keep Writing,<br />
                     Maria 
                     <br /><br /><br /></div>
                  <p>
                  </p>
                  <embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AcW9EY6aLw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="390" width="480">
                  </embed>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=ca5da926-f6fc-45ec-bec1-e10fa4ac32f5" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>More on simultaneous submissions to agents</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/More+On+Simultaneous+Submissions+To+Agents.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,32c6cc02-0be1-4118-ac2c-df5512582f8a.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-05T11:09:19.3140000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-05T11:15:39.1194299-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
                     Since there were so many comments and questions about the <a href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Brad+Thor+On+Simultaneous+Submissions.aspx">Brad
                     Thor post on simultaneous submissions </a>to agents, I asked my favorite agent expert,
                     Chuck Sambuchino, of the <a href="http://www.guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog/">Guide
                     to Literary Agents</a> to give us his take on the issue. Here's Chuck:<br /><br /><br /><i>First of all, I have to disagree with Brad's comment that agents hate simultaneous
                     submissions.  They are the norm, and most agents accept that they are not the
                     only one receiving a specific query. So all of these comments here with people saying
                     "I agree with Brad" are right!<br /><br />
                     Indeed, don't put your eggs in one basket. It's silly. But just as bad as putting
                     your eggs in one basket is querying TOO MANY agents - such as 100. You're showing
                     you haven't done any research.  You should have about 5 "ideal" agents and maybe
                     25 total "possibilities" after doing some research and reading. Send queries out in
                     waves. Query your top five. If none say yes, try the next five, and so on. The more
                     vigorous research you do, the fewer possible agents you will have on your list, but
                     the payoff is that you will be able to impress those agents you DO query by showing
                     WHY you picked them out of the bunch. That goes a long way.<br /><br />
                     Next, know that "multiple submissions" and "simultaneous submissions" arenot the same
                     thing. The former is when you send several works (or queries) to the same agent at
                     the same time.  Perhaps a script manager wanted to seeall the screenplays you
                     had in your arsenal, for example.  The latter is what we're talking about here
                     - querying multiple agents at once.<br /><br />
                     All that said, yes - do know that some agents request an "exclusive" look at your
                     work, but these are rarer than you may think.  It's up to you as to whether you
                     want to agree.  You're getting a close read of your work, but your hands are
                     tied, so to speak.  Requesting an exclusive is much more common when an agent
                     requests a full manuscript than just when we're talkingabout queries.  So you
                     should be OK sending out plenty of queries, but then you'll run into exclusive requests
                     when they want to see a partial or the full work.<br /><br />
                     Good luck.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog/">Chuck Sambuchino<br />
                     Editor, Guide to Literary Agents<br />
                     guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog</a><br /><br /><br /></i>Keep Writing,<br />
                     Maria <i><br /></i><br /><br /></div>
                  <p>
                  </p>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=32c6cc02-0be1-4118-ac2c-df5512582f8a" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Announcing: WD Live author interviews</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Announcing+WD+Live+Author+Interviews.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,b5eee6eb-e6dd-4aff-8bea-bbc2cf3c9b1d.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-04T16:53:29.8960000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-04T16:55:11.7069618-04:00</updated>
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="Writer's Digest news" label="Writer's Digest news" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="writing conferences" label="writing conferences" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
               Writer's Digest is pleased to announce the debut of WD Live, a series of free live
               video interviews with top-name authors from ThrillerFest 2008. 
               <br /><br />
               Just to give you a taste of what's to come, here's an entertaining segment with authors
               Steve Berry, Brad Thor and James Rollins, discussing how they quietly began writing
               each others characters into their respective books. 
               <br /><br />
               We'll be rolling out more in the next few weeks, so stay tuned! And, as always, I'd
               love your feedback.<br /><br />
               Keep Writing,<br />
               Maria 
               <br /></div>
              <embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AcW9S46aLw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="390" width="480">
              </embed>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=b5eee6eb-e6dd-4aff-8bea-bbc2cf3c9b1d" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Brad Thor on simultaneous submissions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/Brad+Thor+On+Simultaneous+Submissions.aspx" />
    <id>http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/PermaLink,guid,cc5b1851-3e2a-46ec-b1a6-dd669acea53c.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-07-31T17:02:10.0930000-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-03T10:56:42.4306621-04:00</updated>
    <category term="publishing news and views" label="publishing news and views" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <category term="the writing life" label="the writing life" scheme="dasBlog" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div align="left">Hi Writers,<br />
            I'm in the middle of transcribing a lengthy Q&amp;A with <a href="http://www.bradthor.com/">Brad
            Thor</a> (<i>The Last Patriot</i>) for the December issue of <i>Writer's Digest</i> and
            I thought what he had to say about literary agents was quite interesting for going
            against the grain of traditional publishing wisdom (this is unedited, direct from
            a transcript): 
            <br /><br /><i>I know agents hate hearing this, but the single agent submission process is so
            un-businesslike, and this stuff about well you should only pitch one agent at a time
            and wait to hear back—that’s BS. I really don’t believe in that. I tell people, put
            together the strongest best package you can. Why should you wait months to hear back
            from an agent only to be told no, and then you have to wait a few more months. It’s
            ridiculous. I had agents lose my submissions, take forever to get to it and I thought,
            you know what, this is ridiculous. I’m not doing this just because this is the rules
            that they’ve set up for themselves. I thought, they’re not going to know if I’m submitting
            to multiple places. And what happens with agents when they’re submitting you’re book?
            They try to start a bidding war! They’re not going to wait onesie, twosie, at every
            publishing house to see what they think. Authors should do multiple submissions to
            agents. I mean, that’s the way the business world works and whether or not the industry
            likes it or not, they can’t stop you from submitting to multiple agents and you know
            what? If an agent misses out on you because they took too long with your query letter,
            tough luck for them. It will be a smart, savvy agent who recognizes your talent, who
            snaps you up. And I really believe that.<br /><br /></i>So, what do you think about multiple submissions to agents? 
            <br /><br />
            Keep Writing,<br />
            Maria 
            <br /></div>
            <p>
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.writersdigest.com/writersperspective/aggbug.ashx?id=cc5b1851-3e2a-46ec-b1a6-dd669acea53c" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>