Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| October, 2008 (1) |
| September, 2008 (7) |
| August, 2008 (11) |
| July, 2008 (11) |
| June, 2008 (11) |
| May, 2008 (12) |
| April, 2008 (11) |
| March, 2008 (15) |
| February, 2008 (11) |
| January, 2008 (12) |
| December, 2007 (9) |
| November, 2007 (14) |
| October, 2007 (17) |
| September, 2007 (13) |
| August, 2007 (8) |
| July, 2007 (6) |
| June, 2007 (10) |
| May, 2007 (4) |
| April, 2007 (7) |
Search
Archives
Blogroll
|
 Thursday, August 21, 2008
Speaking of crazy slush piles...
Posted by Maria
Hi Writers, Thanks to all who spoke their piece on my previous post. Great discussion, feel free to continue the dialogue. The issue Charlotte Cook brought up though, about facing an overwhelming slush pile, is something that's a widespread problem in the publishing industry. And I found an article on BookSeller.com " The Slush Pile Goes Online" that has a lot of great info about this move to get the public to vet the slush, so to speak. I've been thinking about this since around the Writer's Digest office we've been chatting about HarperCollins soon-to-launch Authonomy project, in which writers are invited to post lengthy excerpts from their novel for peer review and ostensibly recommendation for publication by HarperCollins. I'll post more on this when Authonomy actually launches. But in the mean time, here's a brief excerpt from the Bookseller.com piece: HarperCollins ahead
With its eye closely trained on digital opportunities, HarperCollins
is now developing its own peer-review website for unpublished writers.
Rahim Hirji, HC corporate strategy manager, says: "We realise there are
talented would-be authors out there, and also recognise the onset of
digital. We tried to think about those two things together to look at
how we could utilise the internet in finding new talent."
Would-be authors will be asked to submit all, or at least 10,000
words, of their work so that it can be reviewed by other writers or
those looking for talent. "We are using the democratic nature of the
internet, where people like to give opinions and review and rate work,"
Hirji says. "There are two sides of the project: the cream of the crop
rising in the sense of the best reviews, but also we will put the
reviewers into their own leagues."
The site, authonomy.com, is provisionally scheduled to go live in
February 2008. Hirji adds: "It’s difficult for publishers to go through
every manuscript that comes in, so we look to agents. We wanted to
create a site where talent is showcased. It’s not just a marketing
exercise; we are looking to source talent in new ways."
So what's your take on the movement to bring the slush pile to the people? Good trend or not? Let's hear it. Keep Writing, Maria publishing news and views
8/21/2008 3:38:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Writers are Readers
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, Publishers Weekly published an essay last week " Two-Way-Street" by Charlotte Cook. Cook, an independent publisher of her own book line, Komenar Publishing, was the subject of a short profile in Writer's Digest last year. She writes that she was deluged with queries, phone calls and submissions after that article came out. It seems like attention would be a good thing for a small publishing house. But here's the rub: Cook writes that even with all of the attention Komenar received for that article in WD, they've seen little impact in the way of sales. I suppose the implication here is that writers aren't supporting the industry that they're asking to support them. This makes me sad on a number of levels, but especially because I don't believe it's an accurate assumption to draw from one publisher's experience. I think, if anything, writers are the heaviest readers and the heartiest supporters of the book industry. So, in the spirit of solidarity with your fellow writers, I'd love to hear your comments on what you're doing to support the struggling book industry. "A writer is a reader moved to emulation." -Saul Bellow Keep Writing, Maria Inspiration | publishing news and views | the writing life
8/19/2008 10:42:18 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, August 18, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: Lee Child
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, Another video today--I know, I spoil you. Today's video is an interview with Lee Child, author of the spectacular Jack Reacher series. Here Lee talks about why he switches between first and third person point-of-view in his novels. Keep Writing, Maria
Inspiration | the writing life | WritersDigest.tv | writing technique
8/18/2008 1:49:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, August 14, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: M.J. Rose
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, It's another visual aid bonus day here on the Writer's Perspective!
Here's a short video interview with bestselling author and Writer's Digest marketing columnist M.J. Rose, who knows more about marketing books than anyone I've ever met. She's a true industry dynamo and visionary. Check her out here.
Keep Writing, Maria
publishing news and views | the writing life | WritersDigest.tv
8/14/2008 10:22:31 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Free Books for Funny People
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, I wanted to let you all know that TOW Books, a humor book imprint here at F+W Media is offering free digital downloads of their books, including that of my favorite humorist, Jason Roeder who writes the Roeder Report for Writer's Digest. If you're not familiar with Jason, here's one of his recent columns: The Roeder Report: Just Trying to Be Nice
by Jason Roeder
“Your story puts my navel-
gazing claptrap into reassuring perspective.”
“I’ve never considered literacy a mixed blessing until now.”
“Did you outsource this story to the dumbest squirrel you could find?”
A few years ago, I shared a short story with my writing group. It was a
speculative work that dared to ask, “What if the circus took over the
world?” The comments above were the three most encouraging I received
from my cohorts. Of the two remaining members of my group, one handed
me back my heavily wept-upon manuscript without a word, while the other
simply dropped out of society.
But it wasn’t the criticism that bothered me; it was the brutality of
it, the absolute absence of tact or empathy. It didn’t have to be like
that. If my group had followed the suggestions below, I might not have
lost confidence in my story. Instead, it just gathers dust at the
bottom of a drawer—in the issue of The New Yorker that published it with no changes whatsoever.
1. SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE.
You can usually come up with at least one morsel of genuine praise: “I
love your use of sensory details,” “This story hardly triggered my gag
reflex at all” or “Outstanding work. You should definitely consider
submitting it to a journal with no stated plagiarism policy.” A small
dose of encouragement demonstrates that you’ve been evenhanded, and
when you get around to making more critical comments—or feeding the
pages of the manuscript into the fireplace, shrieking, “Back! Back to
the hell from which you came!”—you already will have put them into a
more balanced context.
2. PLEAD IGNORANCE.
Sometimes it helps to qualify a critical remark by emphasizing your
unfitness in making it. For example, when you’re handed an atrocious
J.R.R. Tolkien knock-off, you can say, “I’m not sure why you devoted
the entire 23 pages to having the elf king carefully review the
prospectus for his new Vanguard mutual fund, but I don’t read much
fantasy.” Or, when presented with an awful horror story: “While I
personally might not find 5,000 words about bubble baths particularly
frightening, I’m probably missing something that regular horror readers
would pick up right away.”
3. GIVE THE WRITER A KITTEN.
Sometimes, there’s no rhetorical maneuver to bail you out. Sometimes
you read something that makes you wish you could take the English
language in your arms and reassure it that the bad man with the
900-word sentences isn’t going to hurt it anymore. If there’s no way to
soft-pedal your comments, you might as well do something nice to
compensate. If no kitten is available, consider giving the writer—along
with the feedback you’ll never be forgiven for—a day of beauty at a spa
or some gourmet preserves. And then run like hell.
You can get free digital downloads of many books in the TOW Books line here. Keep Writing, Maria
 publishing news and views | the writing life
8/13/2008 10:43:48 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: Interview with David Baldacci
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, If there's one thing I've learned from spending time with all the thriller writers at ThrillerFest 08, it's that the adage, "write what you know" holds little merit.
Here's another short Q&A I did with David Baldacci, in which he discusses the merits of writing what you don't know.
Keep Writing, Maria
the writing life | WritersDigest.tv | writing conferences | writing technique
8/12/2008 1:55:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, August 06, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: Sandra Brown
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, Remember back last month when I was at ThrillerFest, the great writing conference/party thrown by the International Thriller Writers? Well, I got the chance to do some video interviews with a few thriller luminaries, including the amazing Sandra Brown. So here's a a short (around 4 minutes) Q&A I did with Sandra, in which I ask the brilliant question: So how do you get to be Thriller Master anyway, do you have to kill someone! (I don't think Diane Sawyer has anything to worry about). Keep Writing, Maria
the writing life | writing conferences | writing technique | WritersDigest.tv | Inspiration
8/6/2008 2:22:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, August 05, 2008
More on simultaneous submissions to agents
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, Since there were so many comments and questions about the Brad Thor post on simultaneous submissions to agents, I asked my favorite agent expert, Chuck Sambuchino, of the Guide to Literary Agents to give us his take on the issue. Here's Chuck: First of all, I have to disagree with Brad's comment that agents hate simultaneous submissions. They are the norm, and most agents accept that they are not the only one receiving a specific query. So all of these comments here with people saying "I agree with Brad" are right!
Indeed, don't put your eggs in one basket. It's silly. But just as bad as putting your eggs in one basket is querying TOO MANY agents - such as 100. You're showing you haven't done any research. You should have about 5 "ideal" agents and maybe 25 total "possibilities" after doing some research and reading. Send queries out in waves. Query your top five. If none say yes, try the next five, and so on. The more vigorous research you do, the fewer possible agents you will have on your list, but the payoff is that you will be able to impress those agents you DO query by showing WHY you picked them out of the bunch. That goes a long way.
Next, know that "multiple submissions" and "simultaneous submissions" arenot the same thing. The former is when you send several works (or queries) to the same agent at the same time. Perhaps a script manager wanted to seeall the screenplays you had in your arsenal, for example. The latter is what we're talking about here - querying multiple agents at once.
All that said, yes - do know that some agents request an "exclusive" look at your work, but these are rarer than you may think. It's up to you as to whether you want to agree. You're getting a close read of your work, but your hands are tied, so to speak. Requesting an exclusive is much more common when an agent requests a full manuscript than just when we're talkingabout queries. So you should be OK sending out plenty of queries, but then you'll run into exclusive requests when they want to see a partial or the full work.
Good luck.
Chuck Sambuchino Editor, Guide to Literary Agents guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog
Keep Writing, Maria
publishing news and views | the writing life
8/5/2008 11:09:19 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, August 04, 2008
Announcing: WD Live author interviews
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, Writer's Digest is pleased to announce the debut of WD Live, a series of free live video interviews with top-name authors from ThrillerFest 2008.
Just to give you a taste of what's to come, here's an entertaining segment with authors Steve Berry, Brad Thor and James Rollins, discussing how they quietly began writing each others characters into their respective books.
We'll be rolling out more in the next few weeks, so stay tuned! And, as always, I'd love your feedback.
Keep Writing, Maria
the writing life | Writer's Digest news | writing conferences
8/4/2008 4:53:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, July 31, 2008
Brad Thor on simultaneous submissions
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, I'm in the middle of transcribing a lengthy Q&A with Brad Thor ( The Last Patriot) for the December issue of Writer's Digest and I thought what he had to say about literary agents was quite interesting for going against the grain of traditional publishing wisdom (this is unedited, direct from a transcript): I know agents hate hearing this, but the single agent submission process is so un-businesslike, and this stuff about well you should only pitch one agent at a time and wait to hear back—that’s BS. I really don’t believe in that. I tell people, put together the strongest best package you can. Why should you wait months to hear back from an agent only to be told no, and then you have to wait a few more months. It’s ridiculous. I had agents lose my submissions, take forever to get to it and I thought, you know what, this is ridiculous. I’m not doing this just because this is the rules that they’ve set up for themselves. I thought, they’re not going to know if I’m submitting to multiple places. And what happens with agents when they’re submitting you’re book? They try to start a bidding war! They’re not going to wait onesie, twosie, at every publishing house to see what they think. Authors should do multiple submissions to agents. I mean, that’s the way the business world works and whether or not the industry likes it or not, they can’t stop you from submitting to multiple agents and you know what? If an agent misses out on you because they took too long with your query letter, tough luck for them. It will be a smart, savvy agent who recognizes your talent, who snaps you up. And I really believe that.
So, what do you think about multiple submissions to agents? Keep Writing, Maria publishing news and views | the writing life
7/31/2008 5:02:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 29, 2008
We're going to Maui!
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, It's my great pleasure to announce our sponsorship of the 2008 Maui Writers Conference, which this year is on the road to Honolulu. Brian and I will be there for three full days over the Labor Day holiday, August 29-September 1 reporting live from the conference via this blog and our e-newsletter. So stay tuned, and if you can get yourself to the Maui Writers Conference, I can promise you won't regret it--this is one of the premiere writing events of the year! Tell me, who looks more Hawaiian, me or Brian? Check out the poll on the WD forum or leave comments here. Mahalo. Keep Writing, Maria   writing conferences
7/29/2008 9:58:27 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, July 22, 2008
From fired to inspired?
Posted by maria
Hi Writers, I've been attending a lot of writing conferences recently and in listening to keynote speeches I've noticed an odd correlation in the first-published stories of many writers.
Just off the top of my head, I can name three bestselling authors who cite being fired as the impetus to write and sell their first book.
• Lee Child lost his job with the BBC and soon after wrote and sold his first Jack Reacher novel.
• Sandra Brown wrote her first novel after being fired from her TV reporter position.
• Laurell K. Hamilton was downsized from her job with IBM when she decided to give the writing thing a real crack.
Anyway, don't go off and tell your boss off, this is merely an unscientific observation, but I have started to wonder if "fired" leads to "inspired." What do you think?
Keep Writing, Maria
the writing life
7/22/2008 11:57:45 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|