Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<September 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011

Blogroll




 Friday, September 05, 2008
The Don'ts of Book Submissions
Posted by Brian

Aloha writerly friends,

I'm back from the Maui Writers Conference. It was definitely hard to drag myself into the office today, but I made it. Maria refused to come home until she had evened out her tan, so don't expect her back until early next week.

In the meantime, I thought I'd pass along these five don'ts that I picked up attending a panel at the conference. The three panelists, Elizabeth Evans (Reece Halsey North Agency), Catherine Fowler (Redwood Agency) and Robert Guinsler (Sterling Lord Literistic), said these are tips every writer should abide by:

The Don'ts

1. Don't send your full manuscript off the get go. Only send what's requested in the particular agent's guidelines. (They almost always can be found online.)
2. Don't respond to a rejection letter or ask "why." Just move on.
3. Don't be rude or disrespectful—rejection isn't personal, it's just part of the business.
4. Don't submit to one agent at a time. The industry is slow so it's unrealistic for agents to assume you haven't sent it to other people (unless an agent asks for an exclusive read).
5. Don't resend a query or manuscript a day or two later with a note, "I found a mistake in my proposal and fixed it." Once it's sent, it's sent.

I hope you didn't miss us too much. I definitely missed all of you—it's hard to survive a week without my writing family. Next time I'll see if I can get the WD jet to swing by and pick everyone up. I'm sure Maria can write that into the 2009 budget.

Take care of yourself and your writing,
Brian

Check out Brian's Questions & Quandaries blog.


writing conferences
9/5/2008 10:42:36 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [7]
 Wednesday, September 03, 2008
5 Nifty Google Writing Tools
Posted by Zac

Hi, writers,

Maria is likely sipping exotic neon cocktails and hanging out with top writers as the Maui Writers Conference wraps up in Hawaii, so this week I’m taking over The Writer’s Perspective and the WD fort in Cincinnati, wearing an old lei from a luau-themed office party.

I originally planned to blog about nationwide newspaper cuts (our local Cincinnati Enquirer mentioned today that 15 newsroom staffers have accepted buyouts), but I’m working on some great material for the January/February issue, so let’s go with a less grim topic—let’s go with some of my overly abused Google writing tools.

Here are five free, simple, nifty writing tricks I picked up as a reporter that can be surprisingly handy when editing or writing.

•    Google Phonebook: Looking to hunt down the phone number of that mysterious source before deadline? Go to Google.com and type “phonebook: John Smith Nevada.” Now you have all the John Smiths in Nevada, and you didn’t need to root through any hulking yellow tomes.

•    iGoogle: My over-checked guilty pleasure. At iGoogle.com, you can set up a custom web page, and you can even tailor it to your own writing and reading ends with a database of free widgets. For instance, mine has both of my e-mail addresses plugged into it, seven news feeds, a word of the day, an artist of the day, a dictionary form, a thesaurus form, a daily literary quote and a strange “Writer’s Idea Bank” tool. Overkill? Probably. Perfect for compulsive e-mail-checking writers? Definitely. (Requires free Google account.)

•    Google Docs: This is a relatively new one in my lineup, but one that I’m increasingly using. At docs.google.com you can find the tech behemoth’s free online word processor, which allows you to write, edit, save and even format your material as you would in a normal program. Upside: You can access your writing anywhere without a flash drive. Downside: No internet connection? Ut-oh. (Requires free Google account.)

•    Google Calculator: I didn’t get into writing because I was good at math, so it’s a good thing search engines are. Simply type “456*993” into the browser and you’re a whiz. If you still remember what square roots are, you can do those, too.

•    Define: The crown jewel, crucial for helping your writing (or settling arguments) when you don’t have a dictionary or Internet connection handy. Text message Google with your cell phone (466453) and write “Define: Athabascan.” Soon enough, your mobile phone is telling you all about Alaska and Western Canada. Texting Google also works for movie times, weather and directions.

For more, visit google.com/help/features.html. What are your favorite writing gadgets and widgets?

Read on and write on,

Zac

--

Zachary Petit
WD Managing Editor


blogs and online writing | journalism | the writing life | writing technique
9/3/2008 3:32:39 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [4]
 Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Off to the Maui Conference
Posted by Brian

Hey all,

Maria and I are packing our bags and ready to head out to the Maui Writers Conference—oh the hardships of being an editor (insert smilie face here). She wanted to post, but was too busy trying to locate a reasonably-priced grass skirt on eBay, so I'm filling in. Thankfully, I already own one.

Not much new to report today, but we do have a favor to ask: We're looking to improve our online efforts and hope you're willing to spend a few minutes to complete an online survey about your Internet habits. Your response will help us serve you better and make WritersDigest.com an even better resource for writers. Give us your feedback here!

Maria will check in on Friday and update everyone on notable events at the conference. And if she can drag me away from the beach, I will too—as long as I'm allowed to type while wearing my grass skirt.

Take care of yourself and your writing,
Brian

Check out Brian's Questions & Quandaries blog.


writing conferences
8/27/2008 1:59:55 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [5]
 Monday, August 25, 2008
Alegra Clarke's latest entry
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
Writer's Digest 2007 Annual Competition winner Alegra Clarke has been updating us on her progress to get her novel published. Here are photos of our trip to New York. And here is her last post about her trip to New York to meet with agents.

Alegra's latest entry:

Before I went to NYC the inevitable question, 'So, what do you write?' resulted in one of my best 'Wow! Great day we are having!' smiles and an under-the-breath answer of, 'Oh, you know, I mostly like to write words, I aim for complete sentences, and I really like paragraphs…'

I had not found the genre for the novel and its absence made me feel unsettled, as if any moment my writer status was going to be revoked. During this time my husband tried to reassure me by saying, 'just the fact that you think like this is proof that you are hardwired to be a writer.' I think he was insinuating something about me having 'a tendency towards anxiety' or an 'overactive imagination.' But it wasn't either of these things (really it wasn't!), it was because I understood what having a genre or a solid 'elevator pitch' meant. It meant I had a solid grip on the story.

I have spent the last two months since the NYC trip plotting, testing my plot, researching, plotting again, sending my ideas to Joel Gotler, whose patience and generosity with me is enormous, until finally I could feel it and see it; the plot, the story I wanted to tell. With this came the knowledge of genre. I can now confidently say, 'I am writing a psychological thriller.' And believe me, for the last few weeks I have rolled the words around with obnoxious glee, harassing my friends with, 'Ask me what I write…go on, I dare you!'

It has been a wild journey and I think it is only about to get wilder. In fact, I am depending on it. The original novel I wrote I can now see as a passionate and sincere effort at beating around the bush. That manuscript has become a fertile pile of compost for growing short stories. It might even be gestating a novel or two. But it isn't the novel I am now writing. What I have now is the storyline the other draft was circling around. The learning process has been so accelerated that at times it is unnerving. I look back at something I wrote even five months ago and think, 'How could I have not missed that fatal flaw? Why did I not get something so simple and obvious?' All I can do is reassure myself that this is proof that I am improving and keep on with keeping on.

I am now in the last few months of research and plotting before I dive into the actual writing. I am doing things very differently this time by plotting in advance. I have always admired writers who can sit down with an idea or a question and pour out a novel in one draft, revise it and then be done. I am not that kind of writer - at least not at this stage.  And if I had a penny for every edit I did I would be one wealthy woman.

I personally don’t believe a dark story can be told halfway, it is a world that must be entered into completely. I have been organizing things in preparation for diving into the writing of this novel as opposed to my first attempt that was often written with one or both of my children hanging off of me like a jungle gym or engaging me in a chorus line of “No! Don’t touch that electrical socket! No! Don’t put your sister in the toilet!”

The last few months since NYC have felt like preparing for an extended journey. I was recently stunned by watching Heath Ledger in the Dark Knight because of how he intensely embodied some of the qualities of 'evil' I am hoping to explore in writing. I have always been fascinated by what it takes for an actor to take on a disturbing role and now I am about to embark on finding out what it will take for me as a writer. I think the most obvious answer is, “Lots of chocolate and coffee.” But I might be oversimplifying things.



Alegra will be updating us on her quest to get her novel published so stay tuned for more.

Keep Writing,
Maria


the writing life
8/25/2008 10:10:24 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [19]
 Thursday, August 21, 2008
Speaking of crazy slush piles...
Posted by Maria

Hi Writers,
Thanks to all who spoke their piece on my previous post. Great discussion, feel free to continue the dialogue.

The issue Charlotte Cook brought up though, about facing an overwhelming slush pile, is something that's a widespread problem in the publishing industry.

And I found an article on BookSeller.com "The Slush Pile Goes Online" that has a lot of great info about this move to get the public to vet the slush, so to speak. I've been thinking about this since around the Writer's Digest office we've been chatting about HarperCollins soon-to-launch Authonomy project, in which writers are invited to post lengthy excerpts from their novel for peer review and ostensibly recommendation for publication by HarperCollins. I'll post more on this when Authonomy actually launches.

But in the mean time, here's a brief excerpt from the Bookseller.com piece:

HarperCollins ahead

With its eye closely trained on digital opportunities, HarperCollins is now developing its own peer-review website for unpublished writers. Rahim Hirji, HC corporate strategy manager, says: "We realise there are talented would-be authors out there, and also recognise the onset of digital. We tried to think about those two things together to look at how we could utilise the internet in finding new talent."

Would-be authors will be asked to submit all, or at least 10,000 words, of their work so that it can be reviewed by other writers or those looking for talent. "We are using the democratic nature of the internet, where people like to give opinions and review and rate work," Hirji says. "There are two sides of the project: the cream of the crop rising in the sense of the best reviews, but also we will put the reviewers into their own leagues."

The site, authonomy.com, is provisionally scheduled to go live in February 2008. Hirji adds: "It’s difficult for publishers to go through every manuscript that comes in, so we look to agents. We wanted to create a site where talent is showcased. It’s not just a marketing exercise; we are looking to source talent in new ways."


So what's your take on the movement to bring the slush pile to the people? Good trend or not? Let's hear it.

Keep Writing,
Maria


publishing news and views
8/21/2008 3:38:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [11]
 Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Writers are Readers
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
Publishers Weekly published an essay last week "Two-Way-Street" by Charlotte Cook.

Cook, an independent publisher of her own book line, Komenar Publishing, was the subject of a short profile in Writer's Digest last year. She writes that she was deluged with queries, phone calls and submissions after that article came out. It seems like attention would be a good thing for a small publishing house.

But here's the rub: Cook writes that even with all of the attention Komenar received for that article in WD, they've seen little impact in the way of sales.

I suppose the implication here is that writers aren't supporting the industry that they're asking to support them. This makes me sad on a number of levels, but especially because I don't believe it's an accurate assumption to draw from one publisher's experience.

I think, if anything, writers are the heaviest readers and the heartiest supporters of the book industry.

So, in the spirit of solidarity with your fellow writers, I'd love to hear your comments on what you're doing to support the struggling book industry.

"A writer is a reader moved to emulation."
-Saul Bellow

Keep Writing,
Maria



Inspiration | publishing news and views | the writing life
8/19/2008 10:42:18 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [21]
 Monday, August 18, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: Lee Child
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
Another video today--I know, I spoil you.

Today's video is an interview with Lee Child, author of the spectacular Jack Reacher series. Here Lee talks about why he switches between first and third person point-of-view in his novels.

Keep Writing,
Maria


Inspiration | the writing life | WritersDigest.tv | writing technique
8/18/2008 1:49:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [4]
 Thursday, August 14, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: M.J. Rose
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
It's another visual aid bonus day here on the Writer's Perspective!

Here's a short video interview with bestselling author and Writer's Digest marketing columnist M.J. Rose, who knows more about marketing books than anyone I've ever met. She's a true industry dynamo and visionary. Check her out here.

Keep Writing,
Maria


publishing news and views | the writing life | WritersDigest.tv
8/14/2008 10:22:31 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Free Books for Funny People
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
I wanted to let you all know that TOW Books, a humor book imprint here at F+W Media is offering free digital downloads of their books, including that of my favorite humorist, Jason Roeder who writes the Roeder Report for Writer's Digest.

If you're not familiar with Jason, here's one of his recent columns:

The Roeder Report: Just Trying to Be Nice
by Jason Roeder

“Your story puts my navel-
gazing claptrap into reassuring perspective.”

“I’ve never considered literacy a mixed blessing until now.”

“Did you outsource this story to the dumbest squirrel you could find?”


A few years ago, I shared a short story with my writing group. It was a speculative work that dared to ask, “What if the circus took over the world?” The comments above were the three most encouraging I received from my cohorts. Of the two remaining members of my group, one handed me back my heavily wept-upon manuscript without a word, while the other simply dropped out of society.

But it wasn’t the criticism that bothered me; it was the brutality of it, the absolute absence of tact or empathy. It didn’t have to be like that. If my group had followed the suggestions below, I might not have lost confidence in my story. Instead, it just gathers dust at the bottom of a drawer—in the issue of The New Yorker that published it with no changes whatsoever.

1. SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE.
You can usually come up with at least one morsel of genuine praise: “I love your use of sensory details,” “This story hardly triggered my gag reflex at all” or “Outstanding work. You should definitely consider submitting it to a journal with no stated plagiarism policy.” A small dose of encouragement demonstrates that you’ve been evenhanded, and when you get around to making more critical comments—or feeding the pages of the manuscript into the fireplace, shrieking, “Back! Back to the hell from which you came!”—you already will have put them into a more balanced context.

2. PLEAD IGNORANCE.
Sometimes it helps to qualify a critical remark by emphasizing your unfitness in making it. For example, when you’re handed an atrocious J.R.R. Tolkien knock-off, you can say, “I’m not sure why you devoted the entire 23 pages to having the elf king carefully review the prospectus for his new Vanguard mutual fund, but I don’t read much fantasy.” Or, when presented with an awful horror story: “While I personally might not find 5,000 words about bubble baths particularly frightening, I’m probably missing something that regular horror readers would pick up right away.”

3. GIVE THE WRITER A KITTEN.

Sometimes, there’s no rhetorical maneuver to bail you out. Sometimes you read something that makes you wish you could take the English language in your arms and reassure it that the bad man with the 900-word sentences isn’t going to hurt it anymore. If there’s no way to soft-pedal your comments, you might as well do something nice to compensate. If no kitten is available, consider giving the writer—along with the feedback you’ll never be forgiven for—a day of beauty at a spa or some gourmet preserves. And then run like hell.

You can get free digital downloads of many books in the TOW Books line here.
Keep Writing,
Maria




publishing news and views | the writing life
8/13/2008 10:43:48 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: Interview with David Baldacci
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
If there's one thing I've learned from spending time with all the thriller writers at ThrillerFest 08, it's that the adage, "write what you know" holds little merit.

Here's another short Q&A I did with David Baldacci, in which he discusses the merits of writing what you don't know.

Keep Writing,

Maria

the writing life | WritersDigest.tv | writing conferences | writing technique
8/12/2008 1:55:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Wednesday, August 06, 2008
Writer's Digest TV: Sandra Brown
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
Remember back last month when I was at ThrillerFest, the great writing conference/party thrown by the International Thriller Writers? Well, I got the chance to do some video interviews with a few thriller luminaries, including the amazing Sandra Brown.

So here's a a short (around 4 minutes) Q&A I did with Sandra, in which I ask the brilliant question: So how do you get to be Thriller Master anyway, do you have to kill someone!
(I don't think Diane Sawyer has anything to worry about).

Keep Writing,
Maria



the writing life | writing conferences | writing technique | WritersDigest.tv | Inspiration
8/6/2008 2:22:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [6]
 Tuesday, August 05, 2008
More on simultaneous submissions to agents
Posted by maria

Hi Writers,
Since there were so many comments and questions about the Brad Thor post on simultaneous submissions to agents, I asked my favorite agent expert, Chuck Sambuchino, of the Guide to Literary Agents to give us his take on the issue. Here's Chuck:


First of all, I have to disagree with Brad's comment that agents hate simultaneous submissions.  They are the norm, and most agents accept that they are not the only one receiving a specific query. So all of these comments here with people saying "I agree with Brad" are right!

Indeed, don't put your eggs in one basket. It's silly. But just as bad as putting your eggs in one basket is querying TOO MANY agents - such as 100. You're showing you haven't done any research.  You should have about 5 "ideal" agents and maybe 25 total "possibilities" after doing some research and reading. Send queries out in waves. Query your top five. If none say yes, try the next five, and so on. The more vigorous research you do, the fewer possible agents you will have on your list, but the payoff is that you will be able to impress those agents you DO query by showing WHY you picked them out of the bunch. That goes a long way.

Next, know that "multiple submissions" and "simultaneous submissions" arenot the same thing. The former is when you send several works (or queries) to the same agent at the same time.  Perhaps a script manager wanted to seeall the screenplays you had in your arsenal, for example.  The latter is what we're talking about here - querying multiple agents at once.

All that said, yes - do know that some agents request an "exclusive" look at your work, but these are rarer than you may think.  It's up to you as to whether you want to agree.  You're getting a close read of your work, but your hands are tied, so to speak.  Requesting an exclusive is much more common when an agent requests a full manuscript than just when we're talkingabout queries.  So you should be OK sending out plenty of queries, but then you'll run into exclusive requests when they want to see a partial or the full work.

Good luck.

Chuck Sambuchino
Editor, Guide to Literary Agents
guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog



Keep Writing,
Maria



publishing news and views | the writing life
8/5/2008 11:09:19 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3]